Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
it probably meant Lot
it’s such a shandah, what is this world coming to…
goldilocks,
who said the lollipop was treif
dy,
thank you, i was looking for who said that we gave up moshiach for the medinah
john jacob jingleheimer shmidt his name is my name too three four, and whenever he’d go out the people would always shout, there goes john jacob jingle heimer shmidt la la la la la la la
i know a song that gets on everybody nerves
yes, that analogy makes more sense, but i don’t think his parents would be too happy about it
popa bas abba?
so is she saying that if someone can always figure out why the baby is crying it’s not a pure neshama?
ujm
Joseph
asdfghjkl:
What is a “sponsor”? And what does your sponsor do?
Posted 6 years ago #
asdfghjkl
Jax
ujm
my mentor, like go to person when i struggle with my addiction of the coffee room, in short tells me to stay away from the coffee room. we kinda lost touch me & my sponsor…..
Posted 6 years ago #
Will Hill
Joseph
asdfghjkl, I’ve been keeping an eye on you, but you seemed to be behaving yourself 🙂
But if you insist that I crack down…
that is creepy….
oh…..
here we go again (rolls eyes)
and how is this starting up? (by agreeing with popa im starting up?)
i agree with popa (for once)
just because you might be happy that we have yerushalayim doesn’t make it right, if the alternative was moshiach here and a beis hamikdash you would be crying that we got a consolation prize
its like a little kid happy he got a lollipop for giving up $100
if you’re a dinosaur you do
Gotham Burger
lol, thats a good name!
Got hamBurger
Brooklyn, shmooklyn. Hop a plane to Israel and go to Burgers Bar!
and if you want a little closer there is (was?) one in cedarhurst
The traditional conservative position was that giving tsadakah deprived the poor of an incentive to work and created dependency – and therefore one shouldn’t give them anything since it would hurt them in the long run. This was part of the “protestant ethic” in western culture but is alien to our culture. Indeed, one can argue that the introduction of public welfare and the many entitlement programs was an example of Jewish influence in America.
that isn’t true, the torah talks about not being a slave to the master, due to a sense of dependency (eved ivri)
the torah says aseih shabascha k’chol v’al titzarech l’briyos
additionally, the highest form of tzedakah is giving a person a job, and not a snese of dependancy
democrats are for community support (forcing people through tax to give tzedakah) while republicans are for individual support (tax breaks for charitable contributions)
i tried to google muslem message board defending jews couldnt find anything,
not sure what to google here and not interested in going to a muslem website to see the anti semitism to find a few supporting?
not sure what i’m supposed to be doing here
The voice of moderate and modern Mulims is not something that is heard, esp. when it comes to frum publications.
amil,
is it heard in regards to any publications? can you tell me their names (the publications or the people themselves)?
do they have message boards where moderate muslims defend jews?
i know the son of the leader of hamas is one, but he converted to christianity so any other names?
you see, i was right
like most of the US Congress, are hardly pro-Islam.
like hillary, who kissed suha arafat?
like wasserman-schultz, who is obama’s spokeswoman?
like pelosi, who said netanyahu insulted her?
like who?
i see neither nfgo nor besalel really read my post
what i was saying is newbee asked, why is the left wing pro islam? meaning every person in the left wing
what besalel said was “So they flock to the one sanctuary where they feel their anti semitism can flourish without worry: the left.”
meaning that not all people on the left are however anti semites found their way there
basalel,
basically you’re saying not all left wingers are anti semites, but rather all anti semites are left wingers
the op asked why are the left wing anti semites
sorry rebyidd,
there were sets from each animal on the teivah, and the rest from that species died (ie 2 tigers while the rest died)
Animals desire other animals,
and they (I assume) don’t have a yetzer hara.
didnt chava give the fruit to the animals too?
additionally, why would the animals get destroyed during the mabul?
wait a minute, im going to try to be dan lkaf zchus joe (i can’t believe im saying this)
is it possible that joe is chassidish and took damoshe’s comment as a low blow (unknowingly)
how does he have so much time
with therapy, posting (probably married) how does he do it?
i googled it,
it seems like a machlokes hapoets
some places say would (ayun enchanted learning and wikipedia)
some places say could (scientopia, and poetry foundation)
coz,
i think it normally goes
“how much wood could a wouldchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood
so then the question is, how much wood could they chuck?
wow 80!
i haven’t seen your recent posts, not even the one from last year saying you lost your mod powers
however i remember that mod 80 was feivel
glad to see you back
comlink-x
min b’eino mino isn’t normal therefore it has to be the yetzer hara
wow,
6 josephs in one thread
paa,
i don’t get what the seforno is saying so much, ill have to look it up myself
where is it?
2 more days
aig is @ 58 too
did all of ames’ posts get deleted?
rebyidd,
i’m honored i got that out of you
sam2,
meaning that the meizid became a shogeg
actually yochie is from yochai like r’ shimon bar YOCHAI
this is my take on it (as if anyone cares)
if one follows daas torah and it is wrong, you won’t be going to gehenom b/c you were just ffollowing daas torah
give them some wine
then they become moscatos
oyyoy,
i would’ve replied the same thing but i saw your post
paa,
you stated “Many commentators (e.g. the Seforno) claim that the primordial serpent, the ??? in the Garden of Eden was none other than the Yetzer Hara.”
that only happened after “The Midrash in Bereishis Rabba 18:6 tells us:
“???? ???? ???? ??????? ???? ??? ?????? ??
because he let it consume him
there is a midrash that says that sm was riding on the nachash’s back
clearer now?
but what part wasn’t clear so i could know what to elaborate?
was it my WHOLE post?
if it could be done to the Japanese in WWII it could be done to anyone anytime
paa,
care to elaborate
Many commentators (e.g. the Seforno) claim that the primordial serpent, the ??? in the Garden of Eden was none other than the Yetzer Hara.
i thought that was going after sm (name of the malach) went into the nachash
basically before he had sm he was a normal snake with tayvas but when he let it consume him he allowed sm to enter him whereby he became part and parcel of the yetzer hara
(if something isn’t clear please ask, im on my phone)
newbee
+1
you guys still haven’t realized yet that popa was talking about ernst & young yet?
talk about only looking at the title and not the comments