??coffee addict

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 8,704 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What will it take for the frum community to stop supporting ICE? #2546150
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    “Obviously, you are a Republican, or at least right-leaning, if you are on this site.“

    Sorry thats not a factual statement, there are numerous democrats on this site

    in reply to: Qweurty is ill #2544507
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Qwerty,

    Maybe if he is ignored he’ll just go away, please don’t answer it’ll just fuel a cycle between you and him

    in reply to: Shatnez wool and linen the biblical reason for shatnez #2544259
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    “Coffee addict. First you have to have that relationship in order to have that level of trust.
    And where does one get that relationship, by being authentic and true to self with the rules.
    It has to balance each other.
    The second the rules eat away at the self and become tyranny it will automatically come between the relationship you have with your creator. The two needs to be balanced. That’s why it’s imporant to differentiate truth from tyranny. Also understanding rules doesn’t contradict doing them. You can do them and then understand them.
    Not sure why you would make up something like that just because someone has understanding. Rude much“

    Not sure where you were going over here (sounds like you contradicted yourself here also)

    first you say “ Coffee addict. First you have to have that relationship in order to have that level of trust.
    And where does one get that relationship, by being authentic and true to self with the rules.
    It has to balance each other.”

    And then you say “Also understanding rules doesn’t contradict doing them. You can do them and then understand them.”

    But hey it’s not the first time you just talk without being clear

    in reply to: stocks #2543953
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    I second the mayo’s second mutual fund pick (see above, it’s the one I was referring to)

    in reply to: Shatnez wool and linen the biblical reason for shatnez #2543906
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    “We are here to serve hashem or are we here to have a good life where we are connected and are happy. I think there’s a huge balance between blind obedience/slavery mentality/ and just being _human_“

    There’s a point that rescue is making that makes a lot of sense

    We have to serve Hashem not from a feeling of being forced but because we WANT to

    We said נעשה ונשמע at הר סיני because we trust Hashem has our best interests and we’re no different than a son in the back seat of the car, the father tells him to buckle up the kids will do it because he knows the father loves him and wants what’s best for him, he doesn’t ask questions but it’s not because he’s FORCED TO it’s because he wants to make his father happy because he knows he loves him

    Me thinks rescue doesn’t believe that Hashem loves us and that’s why he has to understand everything before he does it

    in reply to: Shatnez wool and linen the biblical reason for shatnez #2543210
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    middle A in AAQ stands for asking, not answering. Go to chatgpt for answers.

    True maybe I should call you NAA instead 😜

    Anyway the Gemara is in Megillah (כה עמוד ב) and it seems like a מחלוקת why you can’t say על קן צפור … and it’s only according to one מאן דאמר, the other one says because it will cause jealousy since you’re singling out just birds

    Also I tried finding the Gemara you’re referring to but don’t see it anywhere in דף כה

    in reply to: Shatnez wool and linen the biblical reason for shatnez #2541784
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Is “nevuah” (who registered 12 hours ago and already replied 6 times) “rescue”?

    Also Aaq seems like he picks and chooses what he wants to answer to (maybe he thinks it’s a chumra to answer tough questions) but like I said before, there’s a Gemara that goes against that Gemara in ביצה AP how do you answer that

    Some people have selective hearing, Aaq has selective answering (seeing)

    in reply to: stocks #2541386
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    S&P 500 is good (like ujm said) as a mutual fund

    As a stock, I just invested some of my son’s bar mitzvah money in Verizon, they give dividends which im reinvesting into it so in a few years I hope it will be worth something

    in reply to: Shatnez wool and linen the biblical reason for shatnez #2541047
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    “Your bringing up camel wool is cute, but rescue could respond – for example, that camel wool rings a different tone, or that sheep is the focus as this is what people were wearing. I don’t think you can resolve such aggadic discussions – unless you bring your own lesson from your camel.“

    Aaq,

    I see you didn’t understand what I was trying to say, thanks for clarifying

    If someone has a suit that was 98% camel wool and 1% sheep wool and 1% linen there would be NO איסור TO WEAR IT because the sheep wool is בטול in the camel wool since it’s מין במינו

    However if the suit had 98% polyester 1% sheep wool and 1% linen it would be shatnez because the wool isnt בטול since it’s מין בשאינו מינו

    So rescue’s reason doesn’t hold water

    I don’t know that גמרא but if it’s like what you said then it obviously contradicts the גמרא that I quoted

    in reply to: Attn: Coffee Room moderators #2540619
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Rescue reminds me of a news story I heard that a writer from the New Yorker doesn’t feel bad for stealing lemons from Whole Foods because it’s a big store and they “don’t really care” in other words justifying not following laws because it doesn’t make sense to them

    I wonder what other American law rescue doesn’t follow

    in reply to: Shatnez wool and linen the biblical reason for shatnez #2540593
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Aaq,

    Did you read my comment or only the last line?

    in reply to: Shatnez wool and linen the biblical reason for shatnez #2540076
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    I specifically logged in to address rescue and to disprove him for his thinking

    My shul has a weekly shiur in מסכת פסחים that diverted to shatnez and we had a שאלה that if someone has a suit of camel wool and linen it’s not shatnez (it’s only sheep wool that makes it shatnez) so what would be the Halacha of the wool in the suit is 80% camel wool and 20% sheep wool, the sheep wool is בטול to the camel wool and the suit is מותר (look it up yourself)

    Either way in rescue’s case it wouldn’t make a difference what type of wool seemingly

    Also the גמרא says by שילוח הקן that if someone says על קן ציפור יגיע רחמיך משתקים אותו because mitzvos don’t need a reason

    But rescue is smarter than אמוראים

    in reply to: Vance rose from absolutely nothing #2522793
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Square root has a point

    in reply to: What I believe is the truth about the Iran war #2520675
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Philosopher,

    I will not reduce myself to name calling and am just here to give my opinion

    I firmly believe that Trump did what he did because

    1) he thinks that Iran was behind the assassination attempts on his life (hey maybe they were mossad to pretend it was Iran) and wanted to �settle the score�

    2) he told the Iranian people �help is on the way� regarding overthrowing the government (which maybe was also started by the mossad, hey you never know)

    Nuclear ambitions is only an �excuse� on trumps part

    in reply to: Congress’ Permission to go to War? #2519963
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    This is the first time I�ve seen yechiell defend something that trump did

    Not saying it�s the forst just the first time I�ve seen it

    in reply to: A Bit of a Choshen Mishpat Question… #2518983
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    How do you know that they didn�t do it maybe it was mixed up with another and they gave you the wrong one

    in reply to: Looking for an upstate babysitter for the summer #2513271
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Common,

    I think you�re traumatized

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2513232
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    �Now if you�re one of those people who think that Rabbi Miller never made a mistake, explain why he continued defending Chabad until the end.�

    Explaining his stance doesn�t mean I think he NEVER made a mistake

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2513111
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Aaq,

    1) there is a Halacha called Maaris Ayin (not excluding the other problem of bugs in the lettuce)and eating in a treif restaurant falls into that category and just because it�s a close friend doesnt make it permissible

    2) Im trying to explain R Avigdor Miller�s position not try to argue with you

    We agree there is precedent to taking on chumras
    We agree that taking on chumras can be a good thing
    We agree that Rabbi Miller favored chumras over kulas

    To note, parshas yisro�s Toras Avigdor junior was specifically not trying to find kulas

    Just to reiterate, im just trying to explain his shita and your entitled to disagree with it

    Qwerty,

    Im glad we had this discussion it made me think and try to understand both sides to the issue, I agree Rabbi Miller shouldn�t have been said like that, and I find him to be overly blunt sometimes especially on �off the cuff� remarks

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2512734
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Aaq,

    There is a precedent to follow one Rav in all matters based off of his mesorah and not going around picking kulos

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2512287
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    �You are fixated on Chumrahs. I didn�t say that MO�s are better Jews than Charedim. I simply challenged the opinion of Rabbi Miller, and those who agree with him, that MOs are on a lower stratus, because that�s nonsense. I don�t know why you think that adopting Chumrahs elevates a Jew�

    �Again, I�m waiting for you to give your definition of MO.�

    Good voch, I wanted to wait until after Shabbos to answer you so I can formulate it correctly

    The difference is chareidim conform their life to the Torah (Torah being the ????) whereas MO conform the Torah to your life (your life being the ????)

    Since you like examples I�ll give you a few

    1) you only want to say it�s ???? if it�s in a ???

    2) i daven in a Young Israel near my work and a father and his teenage son came over to the Rabbi of the shul because the father wants his son to eat with everyone at a sheva brachos at a treif restaurant and the son didnt feel comfortable doing, so the rabbi was finding things that the son can eat. �I don�t see anything wrong with eating the lettuce�� he said (btw there are bugs in lettuce mind you)

    3) I know a mashgiach that his work wants things done and tells him to ask his vaad how it can be done

    I was thinking what can this be compared to and I thought of a husband that does things not because he�s told but because he wants to make his wife happy, so he�ll wash the dishes without being asked.

    This is what Rabbi Miller is saying, MO serve Hashem on a level of an ??? which is an ok level, whereas chareidim take on chumras which show our love for Him, which is a whole different level, and Rabbi Miller is known for loving Hashem �look at the apple how Hashem makes it delicious for you� is his known line

    Just an aside, I also agree with you that the lady shouldn�t have said that, one shouldn�t go around advertising their chumras

    My intention isnt to insult you or any MOer, im trying to explain what Rabbi Miller�s logic is IMO

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2511776
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Thanks Aaq,

    I think I need to check my tefillin there�s probably a problem in a ?

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2511393
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Neither you nor Aaq has offered an example of what MO are known to be more machmir in over the standard �yeshivish� person

    Kashrus? Tefillah? Shabbos? Tznius?

    Aaq�s examples are �???? ???????� and supporting oneself but these aren�t specific to Jews

    And I would surmise that MO of today are totally different than they were 30 years ago both positively and negatively

    in reply to: Gashmiyus and Lavish Simchas (again) Where are our Gedolim? #2511167
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    I think the problem is because people have lavish simchas but give very little tzedakah, but if they do both it�s totally different imo

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2511110
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    I want to post a retraction

    I found people that I think you are referring to, I think they are few and far between though and think they�re more OOT than in the city

    in reply to: @somejew Re: TYH #2510925
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Hey rebitzen,

    Get your own thread

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2510649
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    �coffee, refuah shleimah. I hope you appreciate your Jewish doctor who is more likely to be MO than a BMG grad.�

    No, it�s a dental problem and my insurance doesn�t have that many Jewish dentists and I won�t get into what happened it�s a long story and there are Jews involved but thanks for the well wishes

    �These are KMOs. TMOs learn either at their shul or at a local kollel after a long professional day. They choose which classes to attend without a need to show kavod to a high-position rav�

    I don�t understand the abbreviations but what I think you are referring to a TMO is what yeshivish people call a �Baal Habus� they work because they�re not cut out for learning or they married a high maintenance girl

    Believe me when R Avigdor Miller is talking about MO he�s talking about KMOs which qwerty was all upset about and I asked what are they �machmir� on

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2510347
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    � Still: MO are more machmir on fulfilling metubah obligations of supporting the wives according to their level; educating their children in umanut; supporting Jews in trouble, whether in Israel or in USSR; everyday middos � safe and ehrliche driving, not driving against �one way� signs; learning Torah lishma; understanding Torah in the context of other info which sometimes leads to better understanding of a sugya; kiddush Hashem in their activities in public sphere; avoiding theft and tax problems in business; mesiras nefesh in paying for day schools and shul membership;�

    Sorry for the late reply, I�m having a medical issue (minor) that im dealing with

    Those things are only because of the modern part of modern orthodoxy in other words if those weren�t American values I don�t think modern orthodox would be machmir in those things

    Also �Torah lishmah�? Who are you kidding? The only way to get MO to a shiur is by offering food

    Also regarding driving I know a lot of Modern people that drive recklessly

    in reply to: Military Self-Defense is a Torah Halacha #2508562
    ??coffee addict
    Participant
    in reply to: Letter From Bereaved Families #2508561
    ??coffee addict
    Participant
    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2508557
    ??coffee addict
    Participant
    in reply to: Empire chickens #2508486
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    �He therefore had disdain for the MO who dress casually. But there�s another reason that�s more to the point. Rabbi Miller felt that rank-and-file Jews should blindly follow their mentors and this isn�t the system in the MO world.�

    Is there any mitzvah chiyuvis that the �MO world� is more machmir than the �Chareidi world� (im saying that because working isnt a ???? ?????? and neither is ???? ??? ????? while we�re in ????)

    In other streams of Yiddishkeit there is found things that one is more machmir than the others

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2506643
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    �Basically he repeated what Rabbi Miller said which is that Modern Orthodox Jews are second class citizens.�

    I don�t see that from

    �Absolutely, the Modern Orthodox are our brothers. Absolutely! If a Jew is a ???? ?????, he tries to keep the mitzvos, then even thought he doesn�t exactly do everything the way we do it, he�s still a brother.�

    But hey you want to see it go ahead

    Btw he �blasts� people sitting in kollel too (in this weeks Toras Avigdor) does that make them �second class citizens�? The answer is no

    in reply to: Can People Please Shovel ! #2506638
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    �If a neighbor is away on vacation and for some reason hasn�t arranged for someone to shovel, that doesn�t mean the sidewalk should be left a mess. It takes only a few minutes to shovel at least a basic path, its not that hard.�

    And anyone who does so has the right to charge top dollar for their work and the homeowner has to pay for it

    Just because you�re away and didnt do your part in hiring someone doesn�t make you absolved from paying for it

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2506146
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    I think Aaq totally �checkmated� qwerty

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2505293
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    �Rabbi Miller, who�s beloved in the Charedi world gave a Dvar Torah on Parshas Beshalach (coincidence?) in which he said that regular, meaning Charedi Jews, should stay as far away as possible from the Modern Orthodox because they don�t represent the ideal of what a Jew should be.�

    I highly doubt that being he was a Rav in a Young Israel

    Can we please close the thread (it�s my thread, I got what I wanted all this is extra)

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2505147
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Im sorry I didn�t realize my innocent question would turn into an argument about some guy being either litvish or chassidish, none of which has any bearing to empire being kosher

    I do know that some people are makpid on chassidish shechita just like Lubavitch wants Lubavitch shcheita just like some people don�t care as long as a frum yid is the Shochet

    in reply to: Women smoking? #2503393
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Common,

    Who says it�s the mir? Maybe Ner Yisrael? Or Skokie? Or kby?

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2503372
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Somejew,

    Sorry I wasn�t clear, I meant how do you know what chicken any company uses

    in reply to: Empire chickens #2502852
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Somejew, how do you know which breed anyone uses?

    Joe, so that means more people would eat it

    in reply to: Nurses Strike NYC #2502579
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    The nurses are murderers even without the strike

    ????? ???????? ??????

    I know first hand

    in reply to: Math Riddles for Dr. Pepper (and other geniuses) #2500457
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Do they have to be different fractions?

    In other words can x=y?

    in reply to: EVIL “nazi” comparisons – motivations #2499327
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    This discussion is reminding me about the story with the Rav in the fancy carriage that the rich person didn�t want to give money to and was told that it depends on what your ????? is, so the standard Israeli isnt thinking of supporting Torah so won�t get the ????

    in reply to: Naki radio vs 24/6 #2498266
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Yes you can choose songs

    in reply to: Military Self-Defense is a Torah Halacha #2497673
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    �Hareidim, even if they are truly learning Torah all day, should be required to undergo a short basic training period so they can defend their own communities if necessary.�

    100% and they don�t have to go to the army app they need is a firearm course

    in reply to: ICE Hero Kills Domestic Terrorist in Minneapolis Saving Lives #2496901
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    Akuperma,

    Where did you get your story from?

    Ujm,

    Where did you get yours from?

    The only way we can really know what happened is by body cam footage

    in reply to: Letter From Bereaved Families #2496797
    ??coffee addict
    Participant
    in reply to: truer words have never been said #2496265
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    It�s only your feelings that are making you feel used, if you view it as your doing them a Chesed because they need the compliment to feel better about themselves you would feel better

    in reply to: Have you ever had your mind changed on this forum? #2495016
    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    �I get up from Shabbos snd check the news and find out he had invaded Venezuela, abducted the president and First Lady�

    Ex-ctl,

    Interesting, it isnt the first time it has happened to a dictator by a president, were you just as upset then? Additionally, Biden offered $25 million for his arrest, so basically you wanted it done, just by someone else?

    ??coffee addict
    Participant

    �We can live in peace together it is possible�

    Tell that to kibbutz beeri and all those other places that got massacred on October 7, they believed like you that �we can coexist� with the Palestinians

    The reason being is because they are led to believe that Israel is �the little Satan� therefore coexistence is impossible

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 8,704 total)