Close this search box.

SHOWDOWN: Treasury Denies Democrats’ Request For Trump Tax Returns

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has made it official: The administration won’t be turning President Donald Trump’s tax returns over to the Democratic-controlled House.

Mnuchin told Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal, D-Mass., in a Monday letter that the panel’s request “lacks a legitimate legislative purpose” as Supreme Court precedent requires.

In making that determination, Mnuchin said he relied on the advice of the Justice Department. He concluded that the Treasury Department is “not authorized to disclose the requested returns and return information.” He said the Justice Department will provide a more detailed legal justification soon.

The move, which was expected, is sure to set in motion a legal battle over Trump’s tax returns. The chief options available to Democrats are to subpoena the IRS for the returns or to file a lawsuit. Last week, Neal promised “we’ll be ready” to act soon after Monday’s deadline.

Treasury’s denial came the same day that the House Judiciary panel scheduled a vote for Wednesday on whether to find Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress for failing to comply with a subpoena for a full, unredacted copy of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report. Fights with other House panels are ongoing.

“I will consult with counsel and determine the appropriate response,” Neal said in a statement Monday.

Neal originally demanded access to Trump’s tax returns in early April under a law that says the IRS “shall furnish” the returns of any taxpayer to a handful of top lawmakers, including the chair of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee. He maintains that the committee is looking into the effectiveness of IRS mandatory audits of tax returns of all sitting presidents, a way to justify his claim that the panel has a potential legislative purpose. Democrats are confident in their legal justification and say Trump is stalling in an attempt to punt the issue past the 2020 election.

The White House and the president’s attorneys declined to comment on the deadline to turn over Trump’s returns.

Mnuchin has said Neal’s request would potentially weaponize private tax returns for political purposes.

Trump has privately made clear he has no intention of turning over the much-coveted records. He is the first president since Watergate to decline to make his tax returns public, often claiming that he would release them if he was not under audit.

“What’s unprecedented is this secretary refusing to comply with our lawful … request. What’s unprecedented is a Justice Department that again sees its role as being bodyguard to the executive and not the rule of law,” said Rep. Bill Pascrell, D-N.J. “What’s unprecedented is an entire federal government working in concert to shield a corrupt president from legal accountability.”

But the president has told those close to him that the attempt to get his returns was an invasion of his privacy and a further example of what he calls the Democrat-led “witch hunt” — like Mueller’s Russia probe — meant to damage him.

Trump has repeatedly asked aides as to the status of the House request and has not signaled a willing to cooperate with Democrats, according to a White House official and two Republicans close to the White House.

He has linked the effort to the myriad House probes into his administration and has urged his team to stonewall all requests. He also has inquired about the “loyalty” of the top officials at the IRS, according to one of his advisers.

Trump has long told confidants that he was under audit and therefore could not release his taxes. But in recent weeks, he has added to the argument, telling advisers that the American people elected him once without seeing his taxes and would do so again, according to the three White House officials and Republicans, who were not authorized to speak publicly about private conversations and spoke on condition of anonymity.


3 Responses

  1. The statute’s language seems very clear, and doesn’t say anything about a legislative purpose. It certainly sounds like the Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee has the absolute right to see any tax return he likes, for any purpose or none. I’ll be interested to see what argument the administration comes up with to justify itself. But frankly I don’t care. Let them hold the IRS commissioner in contempt; he can share a cell with Eric Holder.

  2. Not quite a “showdown”. They start in the District Court, and perhaps it will reach the Supreme Court by the presidential election. There never has been a case in which the right of Congress to look at tax returns absent a legislative purpose has ever been at issue. It raises fascinating legal questions involving the powers of Congress, the right to privacy, freedom from unreasonable searches and separation of powers. The case is a constitutional scholar’s dream come true.

  3. akuperma, I don’t see how it raises any serious questions. There’s no fourth amendment issue because the returns are government property. There is no right to privacy in government documents. Tax returns are confidential only because there’s a law that says so, and that same law makes exceptions for the chairmen of certain congressional committees, who can see whatever they like, no matter what their purpose is.

    There’s never been a case because there’s no room for one; the statute doesn’t require a legislative purpose.

    The separation of powers doesn’t come into it either, for the same reason; tax returns are not a creation of the executive branch, they exist only because Congress made a statute requiring them.

Leave a Reply

Popular Posts