Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 2,851 through 2,900 (of 2,919 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: If ????? ?????said it was tcheiles? #780695
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “What if ????? ????? told you to wear it. Would that make a difference?”

    what if ????? ????? told you to desecrate shabbos? Would that make a difference?

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057480
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “In Medrash Tanchuma on Shlach, the techles is called ganuz. Not lost, but hidden, taken away for time unspecified. As we will not find the aron, the ketores, the other kelim, we will not find the blue juiced blue fish untill it is revealed in its right time, and we are restored to our destiny.”

    look in the sefer Sefunei Temunei Chol (written by the Radzyner Rebbe) where he refutes that claim.

    in reply to: long davening #780585
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “We need to work and support our families; we need to learn; we need to help our spouses; we need to care for our children; we need to do chessed in our communities; we need to look after our immediate families; we need to daven with kavana. The list is endless, and each obligation pulls us in different directions. We can’t to all of them all the time, and we can’t focus too strongly on any one of them to the detriment of others. A one hour shemona esrei is praiseworthy, if that sort of teffilah is your niche, but you can’t use it as an excuse to not do other things required of you – whether at home, work, or school.”

    RSRH, you seem to be forgetting the Gemara in brachos which states that the chassidim harishonim would spend an hour davening as well as an hour before and after preparing to talk to G-d. The gemara asks that if they spent nine hours a day on davening, how did they have time to learn and work? The Gemara answers that since they devoted nine fours to davening, they had special siyata dishmaya that in the few hours remaining they were able to accomplish everything.

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057476
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    It wouldn’t make sense to wear many pairs of tzitzis to be yotzei according to all shitos because if you wear 80 pairs that are each according to a different shita then you are wearing 79 4 cornered garments without the proper tzitzis which entails a violation of a mitzvas aseh for each one.

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057471
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    If Rav Belsky only wears techeiles on shabbos when no one can see it because he doesn’t want people to know that he wears it, it kind of defeats the purpose because now everyone knows anyway

    in reply to: support #1041722
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “who do kids think they are to ask this,no, EXPECT THIS, from her parents?”

    You make it sound like these boys are making unreasonable demands. What is unreasonable about a boy saying “if you want me to learn (so that you can get schar), and therefore I can’t support my family because I’m busy learning; someone else will have to support the family.” It might be the wife or the parents or the in laws. But you can’t play both sides of the fence. If you want a learning boy then you’ll have to pay for it. And if you don’t want a learning boy then why are you reading this thread?

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057460
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “Rav Scheinberg k`yeduah wears around 80 pears of tzitzis. Some of the 80 are techeiles”

    How does that make sense? It’s tarti disasri. Mima nifshach it’s a problem. If the techeiles is real than on all the pairs which do not have techeiles, he would be subtracting a mitzva (i.e. ba’al tigra). And if it’s not real then all the pairs that have a blue string would be in violation of the Rema which I quoted earlier in this thread.

    in reply to: Chasunah Prep…. #762446
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    I agree. Isn’t one of the rules of the coffee room that you are supposed to “write in a language somewhat resembling English”?

    in reply to: support #1041719
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “Do you really think parents are supporting because of the schar or because if they dont support their precious child may not find the perfect shiduch”

    That is a fabulous catch 22 – the parents have to support the boy learning because otherwise their daughter won’t get a good shidduch (the boy that’s learning). So if they really aren’t doing it for the schar then let them just not support the learning boy and then their daughter won’t get the wonderful shidduch with the learning boy that they don’t want anyway. So according to your wonderfully circular logic, how does the problem ever start?

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057456
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “Rav Chaim Pinchas Scheinberg- ( he called his son to find out and was told that some of his tzitzis are tcheiles)”

    What in the world does that mean? He didn’t know that his tzitzis were techeiles? Why couldn’t he just look to see if there were blue strings?

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057454
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “Therefore any reason that they have should be the topic of a teshuva written by one of them”

    There are a number of teshuvos out there. Rav Elyashiv Shlita, Rav Shternbuch Shlita and Rav Shlomo Miller Shlita (and probably others as well, but I don’t know offhand) all have teshuvos in which they enumerate some of the reasons to not where techeiles. The Bais Halevi also wrote a teshuva about not wearing techeiles but there are two different versions.

    in reply to: support #1041718
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “I do not give my other siblings because I dont think that they are real learners”

    And how exactly do you judge who is a real learner and who isn’t?

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057453
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    Rav Hershel Shachter Shlita wears techeiles

    in reply to: support #1041716
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “There is nothign wrong with the daf or getting a chavrusah at morning or at night.”

    Learning an hour a day is great but it’s definitely not the ideal. The gemara in Brachos says that the people who made their work keva and their learning arai, neither was fulfilled.

    in reply to: support #1041714
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “…. and those that cannot afford to do so should not do so.”

    Then they have to find a different way of getting their schar. Perhaps learning themselves.

    in reply to: support #1041713
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    boredinoffice

    Are you upset at people who value learning?

    in reply to: support #1041709
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “The chiyuv is still there but at whos expense?”

    No one is forcing any girl or her parents to support anyone. They take it upon themselves because they realize that that is how they get schar for limud torah.

    in reply to: good yom tov! #760779
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “all the other person has to do is say 2 words back”

    Two words is two words too many. Don’t you know that Bruria rebuked R’ Yosi Haglili for saying two extra words when asking for directions to Lod?

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057447
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    optimusprime

    that’s not a grammatical error, it’s a factual error.

    in reply to: good sayings/quotes anyone?!?!?! #771746
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “Whenever I’m faced with a choice between two evils, I take the one I’ve never tried before.”

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057445
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “Suppose you dye the whole beged with the techeiles. Do you still need to dye the string?”

    Impressive. You were mechaven to Korach’s question.

    in reply to: good sayings/quotes anyone?!?!?! #771743
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    I have it hanging on my fridge.

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057444
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    klach

    in the story you quoted they actually proved that the offending rabbi didn’t know basic things about the topic. You however did not prove that ItcheSrulik doesn’t know what he’s talking about. (I’m not disagreeing with you, I am merely calling into question the validity of your proof. I don’t think you needed a proof though.)

    in reply to: Alte Bochor #761796
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “Is an alte bochor the equivalent of an old maid or spinster?”

    Your question is unclear. Do you mean: Is an alte bochor the equivalent of an old maid or is it the equivalent to a spinster? (i.e. one as opposed to the other)

    or

    did you mean: Is an alte bochor the equivalent of an |old maid or spinster| thus lumping them together.

    the nafka mina would be whether or not you consider an old maid equivalent to a spinster.

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057443
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “Full disclosure: I wear Murex Trunculus techelet”

    Why? Are you a religious zionist?

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057441
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “A very good overview of the techelet written by the organization that makes the murex trunculus techelet can be found here: http://tinyurl.com/techelet”

    That overview is very one sided (understandable since it was put out by a techeiles organization) and does not discuss most of the proofs back and forth. They take for granted that the murex trunculus is the chilazon.

    in reply to: Gebruchts #760768
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “But you have a big responsibility to respect the Minhagim of other, and not ridicule and knock them, like some posters here tend to do.”

    Even if previous gedolim called it a minhag shtus?

    in reply to: Does anyone have any info about… #760719
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    Who came up with the name Seasons for a supermarket?

    in reply to: good sayings/quotes anyone?!?!?! #771739
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “Even if you’re on the right track you’ll get run over if you just sit there.”

    – Arthur Godfried

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057439
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “In the recent dafei yomi Gemara, we learned that the “strings” can be almost any color”

    That’s why we don’t pasken from the gemara.

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057437
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “The color of the beged (that the tzitzis is attached to) is usually white”

    Which is exactly why having blue strings (which are not techeiles) would be problematic according to both the Mechaber and the Rema.

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057435
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “Should those that use supposed “techeiles” be attacked if they chose to wear blue-dyed strings?”

    Yes. The Rema states O.H. 9:5 that Ashkenazim should always wear white strings. Now if what these people are wearing is not techeiles than they are in violation of the Rema.

    Interestingly enough they would be in violation of the Mechaber also because the mechaber in that same siman says that ideally the strings should be the same color as the beged.

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057434
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    The cuttlefish which the Radzyners use only turns blue with the aid of chemicals (pottassium and iron) which Rav Herzog found would turn any organic compound that color. So the cuttlefish dye had nothing to do with the turning blue which is a problem.

    One problem with the murex trunculus is that it is chemically identical to kala ilan. The gemara gives chemical tests that can distinguish between real techeiles and kala ilan. Now if they were chemically identical then no test would be able to distinguish between them. Another problem is that it doesn’t really fit into most of the Gemara’s descriptions of the chilazon (comes up once in 70 years, domeh layam, the dye is better while it’s alive, etc.) unless you deviate from the standard pshat.

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057428
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “Second, the fact that gedolim don’t do it is a kasha on them, not on the techeiles.”

    Actually it IS a kasha on the techeiles because the gedolim have reasons for not wearing it. Maybe you should learn through the sugya and see why the gedolim don’t wear it before you start claiming that the gedolim are wrong.

    in reply to: Gebruchts #760759
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “Also, your story about Gedolim and Matzah ball in their window….

    Our Gedolim know to respect Minhagim that OTHER GEDOLIM set, even though they don’t follow that specific minhag.”

    That was their way of showing that they strongly disagree with the minhag.

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057427
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    There are numerous kashas on both Murex Trunculus and Cuttlefish techeiles.

    in reply to: support #1041706
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “You cant all be the next roshei yeshivos of the generation”

    And therefore the chiyuv of Talmud Torah dissipates? I don’t think it works like that.

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057423
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “Secondly,not one of the Gedolim wear techeiles”

    That is a false statement.

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057418
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    If it’s not a zionist thing then why are they generaly the ones to wear it?

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057414
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    The reason why Rav Sheinberg wears many pairs is not to be yotzei according to everyone. The reason is that each additional pair is an additional mitzva. And why is techeiles a zionist thing?

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057411
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    So what is the correlation?

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057409
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    “In any event, in my circles, it is 0%”

    Does that mean that there is a correlation between certain circles and techeiles?

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057407
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    What I meant was is it just a negligible minority or is it a full blown revolution?

    in reply to: Techeiles 🔵❎🐌☑️🐟 #1057405
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    Larger than a negligible amount

    in reply to: Gebruchts #760755
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    Smartcookie

    What have I said that demonstrates a lack of respect for our gedolim?

    in reply to: New Supermarket In Queens! #780138
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    what kind of name is seasons anyway?

    in reply to: Do you have a dream??? #1019064
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    My goal is to conquer the world and be a tyrannical leader. Eventually I would hope to colonize other planets and galaxies, culminating with me becoming Supreme Dictator of the universe.

    in reply to: charoses #760386
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    Why does there have to be a source to eat something you enjoy? Is there a source in the gemara to eat chocolate cake? No. Yet we all do.

    in reply to: chol hamoed #760711
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    Alas how we yearn for the good old days when schools were in session on chol hamoed.

    in reply to: How to beat a speeding ticket #760417
    Patur Aval Assur
    Participant

    Isn’t that dishonest? Is dishonesty something that you want to teach to all the innocent children reading this?

Viewing 50 posts - 2,851 through 2,900 (of 2,919 total)