“Immoral, Illegal, And Deeply Cynical”: El Al Accused of Wartime Price Gouging in Explosive Class Action Lawsuit


El Al is facing a bombshell class action lawsuit accusing the national carrier of exploiting a time of national tragedy for massive financial gain, The Jerusalem Post reports.

Filed Wednesday in the Central District Court in Lod, the lawsuit alleges that El Al engaged in widespread price gouging in the immediate aftermath of the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks, when most foreign airlines suspended operations and El Al became the dominant — and often only — option for air travel in and out of Israel.

The suit, led by attorney Ilan Verednikov and backed by legal heavyweights Dr. Tal Rotman and Adi Zitron of the Perl Cohen law firm, accuses El Al of leveraging its monopoly status to hike ticket prices well beyond what was justified by operational costs. The legal filing describes El Al’s conduct as “immoral, illegal, and deeply cynical,” taking advantage of a national emergency to line its own pockets.

According to the lawsuit, by the end of Q1 2024, El Al’s pricing practices had caused an estimated 600 million shekels in damages to Israeli consumers — a figure that continued to grow as the war progressed.

The lawsuit is bolstered by expert economic analysis from Professor David Gilo, a former Commissioner for Competition, who examined 24 key flight routes and found El Al held a dominant share in 20 of them. Gilo’s report asserts that the airline’s price increases were not due to rising costs — which actually declined during the period — but were purely profit-driven.

In a wartime economy where thousands of Israelis were desperate to travel or reunite with loved ones, ticket prices on major routes surged by over 14%, the suit claims. El Al, in turn, posted record-breaking financials: a staggering $554 million in net profit in 2024, compared to $113 million the previous year.

While Israeli families bore the financial burden, El Al’s top brass thrived. CEO Dina Ben Tal Ganancia received a 10.2% salary increase, and other executives also saw substantial raises. Employees were awarded a historic $103 million in bonuses, all while consumers paid inflated fares.

Verednikov argues the airline’s actions not only inflicted financial harm, but also dealt a serious blow to the social fabric of the nation. “At a time when solidarity was most needed, El Al chose profit over people,” he stated. “We’re asking the court to ensure that no company is allowed to exploit a national emergency for personal gain — and that those who were harmed are compensated.”

The lawsuit has ignited widespread public anger and drawn the attention of both the Competition Authority and the Consumer Protection and Fair Trade Authority, which have launched investigations into the airline’s practices. However, these agencies are limited in their ability to secure compensation — which is why, Verednikov says, court intervention is crucial.

If successful, the case could see hundreds of millions of shekels in excess wartime profits returned to Israeli consumers.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)



9 Responses

  1. Shame on these guys.
    I’m going to book another flight on ELAL today or tomorrow just to stock it to these money hungry lawyers. They’re in it for their pocketbook – not for the consumers.

  2. אבות דרבי נתן פרק מ
    “החולק לחם לרעבו ונוטל ממנו יותר מדמי שוויו — הרי זה מדרכי סדום.”

  3. If El Al (or any company whose service is subject to anti-Israel or anti-Jewish boycotts) does not base its prices based on the law of supply and demand (meaning the decrease in supply, without a decrease in demand, results in higher prices) – how do they decide who gets the tickets? Perhaps asked some politicians who they should favor or some sort of “social score” (which is what the Chinese might do, and would be devastating to frum Jews since by that standard, hilonim would get first choice for the below-market rate tickets). Especially for a luxury good (e.g. international air travel), pricing based on the law of supply and demand is superior than some sort of rationing system.

  4. There are halochos not allowing profiting in essential items during a war or shortages – this has to be balanced against high costs of operating during a war and disruptions and how essential the air travel is. Maybe some religious customers should take El Al to beit din and that decision might influence the arkaot.

  5. It’s fascinating that they just woke up now to this? Everyone knows they bled us to death. Record profits didn’t give it away? The Monopoly price being $5,000 or more for a ticket? Good morning I’m glad someone finally decided to take it to court. I’m sure they have enough money to pay the best lawyers on the planet as well

  6. please remove this article as the owner of el al is a frum yid and huge baal tzedaka and has many roshei yeshiva that are close to him.

  7. The owner of ElAl is a major baal tzedaka and has a heart of gold. He would never take advantage of another yid. Any price hike was justified for the extra risks involved ie. (Paying staff more for working in high risk situations). Hkbh should give him hatzlocho rabba umeruba.

  8. Disgraceful that YWN would allow criticism over how some of the biggest ba’alei tedokka and those close to Roshei Yeshiva make their money.
    What’s next, asking some of their patients what it’s like to have to live in one of their nursing homes?
    Disgraceful.
    What matters is that they’re big ba’alei tzeddoka, not whether thry’re taking advantage of others in order to make their money.
    I thought YWN was a frum site.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts