Curiosity

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 930 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Voting Democrat #1643955
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Ubiquitin – you seem caught up with your hyperliteral interpretation of the words “party platform” in the OP. Everyone else here had enough reading comprehension skills to realize that the OP didn’t literally refer to the Democratic party’s published platform on their website. The PR material they publish is completely separate to their actual agenda and the de facto policies they pursue through political action. I guess simply writing that they are for Israel or for middle class is enough to convince voters like you, and that is why they do it. No offense.

    Curiosity
    Participant

    Honestly, let’s stop pretending that anyone but those with a personal connection care when a retired politician dies. Why does everything need to be blown up into being such a big deal?

    in reply to: Why Are Torah Observant Jews Overwhelmingly Republican/Conservative? #1634464
    Curiosity
    Participant

    CTLawyer –
    My mistake for mixing up the seifa d’seifa with the seifa d’reisha. What I meant to type was: ‘You lost me at, “victim of a husband who committed adultery.”‘ The point of my statement (which you didn’t address) is sustained.

    Here’s a life tip for you: I know certain arguments fly in the courtroom like claiming evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible, or minor misquotes can invalidate the content of an argument. But when you’re debating outside the courtroom with rational people, harping on technicalities is not going to convince anyone that your point of view is valid and will only make you appear dishonest. In the CR, you’re talking to a jury not to a judge.

    Good luck with your court case.

    in reply to: Why Are Torah Observant Jews Overwhelmingly Republican/Conservative? #1631190
    Curiosity
    Participant

    CTLawyer
    You lost me at “victim of serial adulterer.” By all accounts (except her own) she was an enabler and complicit in these acts you claim to despise, and even worse acts that the MSM isn’t reporting on. Only insidious Democrat operatives have the audacity to still defend that machsheifa.

    Orthodox Jews lean right because the left is consistently wrong on every single issue. Unlike most other groups we vote based on Torah values, not based on greed, lust or populism. Not to say the Republicans fully represent Torah values, but they are by far more in line with them than the anti-Semitic, socialist party of Toeva and government handouts.

    in reply to: Agudah Says to Vote, But Doesn’t Remind Us Who #1618328
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Regardless of your personal considerations regarding your taxes, your concern for your fellow brothers and sisters living in Eretz Yisrael should be the issue that drives you to vote. You, as a Jew living in the most powerful country in the world, and being endowed with the opportunity and responsibility to vote, which we all so shortsightedly take for granted, have the added responsibility of kol Yisrael areivim ze lazeh. It is crystal clear which party supports the Jews in EY and which party supports the Yishmaelim that are biting at the bit to slaughter Jews.

    When you go to shamayim and they ask you why you voted for rulers that detest God and support immorality and Anti-Semitic terrorist nations, I hope “Trump’s tax cuts made my taxes go up” isn’t your choice response.

    in reply to: Which is Worse Publically Converting or Publically OTD? #1606477
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Otd cases are nebech. Converting cases are also nebech, but the nebechkiet is overpowered by the stupidkiet.

    in reply to: Cracking knuckles during davening – The New Mishugas!! #1592578
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Avi K,
    My point is not that the knuckle cracker is patur. He isn’t. My point is that it’s a nisayon from Hashem. And just like most other nisyonot, passing rarely consists of getting the whole world to accommodate you, but rather to do your best in an imperfect world.

    in reply to: Cracking knuckles during davening – The New Mishugas!! #1592513
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Do you think Hashem accepts your tefilla less because someone sneezes and interrupts your concentration? Who do you think put that sneezer or knuckle cracker into your life? Maybe Hashem would rather see you a little distracted but more accepting and tolerant of other Jews, rather than a little distracted and angry and spiteful at them?

    There’s a story about a particular gadol who had a talmid that wanted to get the gadol to daven for a choleh. So one day the talmid wrote the Hebrew name of the choleh in the margin of the gadol’s siddur by refainu. When the talmid realized how disrespectful this was he went to the gadol and profusely apologized for writing in his siddur. The gadol had no idea what he was talking about. He said, ‘when I daven from my siddur, I am looking at the words of the tefilla, not at the margin.’ He didn’t even see the writing.

    The idea is that if we have real focus in our tefilla, it isn’t broken by mundane things in our surroundings. If we’re distracted, it’s because of our own shortcomings, not because of sneezes, knuckles cracking or floorboards creaking.

    in reply to: Tahara at Risk in Lakewood City of Torah #1577042
    Curiosity
    Participant

    “dont let your kids live in a place like this.”
    Any parents that feel they are entitled to “let” or “not let” their adult married children live somewhere based on the parents’ opinions of a community have some serious boundary-overstepping issues they need to work out.

    Curiosity
    Participant

    Beisyosef – Isn’t the Ramban simply giving the taam for the issur klayim? If so, genetic modifications would be assur in the “spirit of the law” but not in the “letter of the law.” And once it’s only the spirit of the law it becomes easier to come up with svaras over why making a treif animal kosher is different, in spirit, than doing klayim.

    in reply to: Shuls in Boca Raton or Hollywood, FL #1574621
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Avram in MD, Still trying to figure that one out.

    in reply to: Shuls in Boca Raton or Hollywood, FL #1574193
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Thanks everyone who contributed information. GoDaven lists nusach, not hashkafa.

    in reply to: Suicide #1571841
    Curiosity
    Participant

    WolfishMusings! I grew up on your posts! Great that you’re still here.
    Wouldn’t “long drop” hangings allow for regret during the drop?

    in reply to: Why dont dems adress economy? #1571840
    Curiosity
    Participant

    The dems do address the economy. They already explained they will offer “free” college tuition for everyone including illegals, subsidise housing, food, and contraceptives, and offer “free” healthcare as a basic right. They’re even discussing offering “basic income” to everyone for “free”. The left wing Vox News, I heard, quoted a new study that these programs would require taxation and government spending at above 60% of GDP, and would add over $100 trillion of debt to the US Economy over the next couple decades…. or was it $200 trillion? I guess at that point, it won’t really matter… They’re basically intending to tax everyone at 50-70% and redistribute that money as they see fit.

    in reply to: Where are all our cool robots? #1569386
    Curiosity
    Participant

    There are a lot more high paying jobs in robotics though. The biggest impediment to mobile robots is the relatively small energy density of batteries.

    in reply to: Pence/Haley for 2024? Or Ryan/Gowdy? #1569091
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Trump/Kanye would be hysterical.

    in reply to: Pence/Haley for 2024? Or Ryan/Gowdy? #1569090
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Shapiro/Gowdy
    Bring on the snowflake tears.

    in reply to: If you vote Democrat you should just move to Mexico #1569089
    Curiosity
    Participant

    AZ, you can keep labeling my facts “straw men” if it helps you sleep at night, but that won’t change them. You can’t take the religious values a very devout Xtian man like Pence shares in an address to a solely Xtian group in an effort to relate to those voters on their religious similarity, and conflate that with an election platform. It’s like saying Schumer’s speech to AIPAC in which he says the Torah says Jews own the land of Israel means that he wants to enact Jewish Torah law as the law of the land in the USA – that’s completely absurd and we both know it’s not true and that he’s just pandering to his base, as all politicians are wont to do.

    The fact of the matter is that a VP doesn’t dictate policy or legislate, so your point is completely irrelevant. If you want to get into absurd things politicians say in speeches, I suggest you listen to Hillary’s campaign speeches in which she asserted at the 2015 Women of the World summit that, (and I quote) “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.” So I ask you, does she deny the freedom of religion protections in the Constitution? I assume not. I assume it’s reckless pandering to her base. Nonetheless, Democrat policies are backward and stupid with destructive ends, and I would never vote for one. Anyone who lists gov’t subsidized contraceptives as a primary reason to vote for the left needs to reassess their priorities.

    in reply to: If you vote Democrat you should just move to Mexico #1568870
    Curiosity
    Participant

    AZ, you’ll have to be more specific on exactly what views you’re referring to. Also, it appears you are not distinguishing between the personal/religious views held by a religiously devout politician as he shares those views with people of his faith in order to identify with them to garner support, and views that the politician runs on as policy. Regardless, mandating that employer insurance must cover $5 contraceptives is not such a major policy issue that it justifies voting for all the radically terrible ideas that the increasingly left-leaning Democrats are pushing, for most people. And besides, the Executive branch’s responsibilities do not include legislation, despite Mr. Obama’s corruption of checks and balances that got us to where we are today.

    in reply to: If you vote Democrat you should just move to Mexico #1568819
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Ubiquitin – I know you can’t do get prices like that. Part of the reason is because every situation varies so much that’s it’s not possible to quote. However, if there’s any added laws I would support it would be pro-free market laws, such as ones which would force health providers to list their charged fees.

    I do agree the military is best run by government. Defending the people and their rights is the number one duty of the government. Public utilities – I would say that’s better handled by municipal and state governments. I don’t need my federal tax dollars going to pay for filling potholes in Albuquerque, and I don’t believe in heavy federal subsidies.

    in reply to: If you vote Democrat you should just move to Mexico #1568753
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Jackk, I also called that a troll, above.

    Ubiquitin,
    Regulations started before Obama. The healthcare system was broken way before Obama thanks to intrusive government. I don’t think the answer to Hospital A charging $60 for aspirins is to add more regulation, which helped caused the lunacy to begin with. The answer is Hospital B down the street from Hospital A that charges $5 for an aspirin, thereby soaking up all the business from Hospital A and causing it to lower its fees. As a general rule, everything the government touches goes to gehenom. Get the government out of healthcare. I also don’t think all employers should have an obligation to provide health insurance – that’s not fair to employers that can’t afford it, and it stifles the economy and growth of small-to-medium sized business that operate in a start-up environment and try to compete with big corporate behemoths.

    in reply to: If you vote Democrat you should just move to Mexico #1568641
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Ubiquitin- When I referenced high costs for routine procedures, I meant things like charging $60 for an aspirin, or $500 for a 10 minute checkup & diagnosis. Maybe “routine” wasn’t the right word to use.

    With regards to pre-existing conditions being covered. As an example, if costs were lowered from the level of insanity that they’re at now, insurance companies might be able to hedge their risk of a small number of people with pre-existing conditions in a large group policy. Say a company with 500 employees has 45 employees with pre-existing conditions. Insurance companies are more likely to calculate that it’s worth the added revenue of 500 monthly premiums to take on the added treatment costs of 45 patients, once the treatment costs go down dramatically. I’m not an actuary so I can’t speak to that with certainty.

    dbrim- Thanks! 😀

    in reply to: Thread for smart expert people #1568646
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Since we have all these great minds together, I’ve been trying to come up with a way to make anti-gravity. Or a space-time fabric stretcher. Same thing. How do we stretch the fabric of space-time? Antimatter? Dark matter? Superconductors?

    in reply to: Hi. Everyone. Do you guys remember me? #1568630
    Curiosity
    Participant

    I was wrong. I was not in 12th grade.

    in reply to: I want to eat cholov stam #1568625
    Curiosity
    Participant

    I’m bringing this throwback thread back in response to ‘i run with scissors’s post on “do you guys remember me” . it’s one of my earlier posts. I stand corrected. I’ve not been posting since 12th grade, but it appears I used to be really funny!!
    So many ancient user names here!

    in reply to: Hi. Everyone. Do you guys remember me? #1568588
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Joseph, I’ve been posting since 12th grade, but that was definitely more than 6 years ago. Unless my memory is just failing me in my old age.

    in reply to: Hi. Everyone. Do you guys remember me? #1568407
    Curiosity
    Participant

    The legendary Popa bar abba!!! I remember most of you from when I was a teen. I didn’t post as often as most of you, but i do remember so many names here. Syag, shopping613, oom, joseph, takahmamash, rebbyid23, DY,golfer, mdg, running with scissors, toi, mammele, Y2mod29, and my favorite childhood superhero, Poppa bar abba… what happened Sam? He knew everything.

    in reply to: If you vote Democrat you should just move to Mexico #1568215
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Amil Zola,
    The story about VP Pence being against contraceptives in policy is fake news propaganda. It has long been debunked. He is against abortion, but that isn’t a contraceptive. I don’t need to address false misinformation.

    in reply to: If you vote Democrat you should just move to Mexico #1568043
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Ubiquitin-
    The OP was just me having some fun trolling Democrats.

    As for healthcare – I agree that you don’t always have a choice with healthcare, just like you don’t always have a choice with tow truck companies, or utility providers, but most healthcare service visits are not emergency situations. The customer usually has a choice. The problem is that prices aren’t published like they are for every other industry, so choices aren’t as informed, and the free market isn’t leveraged. That being said, I do believe in limited regulations meant to ensure safety and quality care.

    The whole health insurance industry is one giant, steaming, government doped scam. If healthcare costs are reduced by the free market to create realistic care costs, insurance will not need to be so expensive – even for pre-existing conditions. Insurance sometimes pays hundreds if not thousands of dollars for routine procedures. This drives the costs up for everybody. The system is broken, but the answer is not to break it even more.

    in reply to: If you vote Democrat you should just move to Mexico #1567978
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Sorry Mods 🙂 I’ve got too much to say on these topics. Believe it or not, I do try to be brief.

    Amil Zola – You don’t have to respond point by point. Those were all points that you brought up, and I did address every single one of them for you. Since you didn’t respond to even one point, I can assume you don’t have a response, which is totally fine. I don’t want to convince everyone to think exactly what I think, but I do encourage people, especially Jews, to use facts not emotions or misinformation, when forming opinions about political topics. I would say that I am vested in rational thinking, and I see zero logic in the Democratic leftist platform, it’s all based on short sighted emotions, in opinion.

    in reply to: If you vote Democrat you should just move to Mexico #1567779
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Amil Zola: You hit a lot of points there. I’ll try to run through them all. For the most part the philosophical difference between conservatism and leftism can be distilled down to that conservatives believe in the limited role of government while leftists believe in a bigger, more involved government. But let’s look at what you brought up:

    Realistic immigration policies –
    The left wants ICE abolished, amnesty for all illegals, implemented an ineffective catch & release policy, want to admit supposed “refugees” that are impossible to vet from hostile regions of the world, and refuse to fund a border wall. You might feel these are good policies, but I think we can both agree these policies are far from “common sense.”

    Regulation of health care-
    Health care is already heavily regulated, which is why it’s so expensive. What we really need is to get government out of healthcare, and let the free market act to create competition to lower costs, like it does in every other sector. Limited government oversight such as parts the FDA should stay intact to ensure safety standards are up to par, but only taking a watchdog role.

    Workers rights –
    I would argue that the free market with limited anti-trust laws is the biggest boon to workers’ rights. Nobody wants to work for a ruthless dictator of a boss.

    Maternal wellness, access to contraceptives –
    Again, it’s not the governments’ role to provide healthcare. It’s not anywhere in the Constitution, and private business is always better and more efficient at these kinds of services than wasteful, bloated government task forces. Also, contraceptives are dirt cheap and available for free on most college campuses. People aren’t getting accidentally pregnant because they can’t afford a $2 contraceptive, it’s because they’re irresponsible, and it’s not the government’s job to be a nanny.

    tax breaks that are fare (sic) to working Americans-
    Leftists want to raise your taxes to pay for more gov’t funded programs, conservatives want to lower taxes. Trump passed a huge tax break this year.

    just pathways to citizenship via military service-
    Conservatives agree we should have immigration law reform, but doesn’t it makes sense to get control of the borders first, before implementing any large immigration reform that may offer perks which will attract more trespassing illegal aliens?

    asylum for the victims of domestic and political abues (sic)-
    We already have that. Conservatives aren’t against that. They’re only against doing it in a way that creates safety concerns in cases where you can’t vet the people coming in. Just look what happened to Europe over the last 5 years.

    et al-
    What else?

    in reply to: Thread for smart expert people #1567774
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Is this like the IDW of the coffee room?

    in reply to: If you vote Democrat you should just move to Mexico #1567605
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Amil Zola:
    Nobody said anything about shipping any citizen off anywhere. It was simply a recommendation to make Democrats’ lives easier and help them achieve their nefarious goals in a way that’s more pleasant for everyone else.

    in reply to: If you vote Democrat you should just move to Mexico #1567290
    Curiosity
    Participant

    CTLAWYER: Oooooh boy! Where do I even start?

    “Curiousity”
    –Not my screen name. (Is he talking to me?)

    “Your ignorance and bias is amazing.”
    –Pleasant evening to you too, good Sir.

    “You paint all who vote for candidates of one party as being the same.”
    –Gross generalization, I admit.

    “I am a Democrat.”
    –Condolences.

    “i vote for individuals. not party. I detest the fool who is leading our country backwards.”
    –Name one example, please. Unemployment rates, foreign policy, trade deficits, GDP growth, NATO contributions by allies, and Israel’s defense by the USA in the UN are all at an all time (or long time) best.

    “The orange haired, serial adulterer”
    –Adulterous women have a thing for rich, fat, married, Hollywood real estate moguls with orange hair, I guess…???

    “who enriches his friends and family and hurts our economy.”
    –You’re conjuring up thoughts of the pay-to-play scandal by the Clintons. Also,the family’s net worth dropped around a reported $1 Billion since he took office. Ivanka just shut down her business. He isn’t getting rich from this.

    “I will pay more than $20,0000 in additional federal tax this year under his new tax structure, money that used go to Tzedaka.”
    — Well, it’s a good thing everybody else will be getting fatter paychecks to add to their tzedaka isn’t it? Isn’t that what Democrats preach? Take from the rich upper middle class and give everyone else free college tuition, Obamacare, Obamaphones, more government benefits, etc? You should really not have a problem with this considering it’s the platform your representatives support. Also Mr. Trump has donated his $400,000 presidential salary to charity to offset your $20,0000, which is not a real number.

    “I don’t want non-citizens to vote, despite your FALSE claim.”
    –Hey! We agree on one thing! There’s hope for you, yet!

    “I don’t want open borders, but those arriving and seeking asylum should not be turned away.”
    –What about the overwhelming majority who sneak across our borders for economic opportunities and cut ahead of actual vetted asylum seekers who are fleeing actual conflicts from actual war zones and are courteous enough to follow our laws and submit a proper application? I’m pretty sure the application is available en español. Not to mention all the women and children victims of rampant human trafficking that occurs because the Democrats won’t support securing the border. If you care about them, seal the border already!

    “Must I remind you of the fate of the passengers on the MS St. Louis back in 1939.”
    –Irrelevant.

    “Trump is a hateful,”
    –Nah

    “divisive,”
    –Can you give me an “O”?! (bama)

    “lying individual.”
    –Can you give me an “H”?! (illary)

    “I’d rather have a family of hard working central American immigrants here”
    — That’s a gross generalization.

    ” and him and his family on the other side of a prison wall.”
    –Is it because of the orange hair? Why do you want to lock Jews up?

    in reply to: If you vote Democrat you should just move to Mexico #1567293
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Arielski- When you have millions more illegals coming in because you invited them with arms wide open as Emperor Obama did, you’ll end up deporting more people. Also, Obama had 8 years, Trump had a year and a half. You have to look at the percentages.

    in reply to: Are some Jewish schools worse than Pharaoh? #1566718
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Noyb – Amram was not doing any of the above, yet his daughter Miriam used the same analogy. That’s not to say they all don’t stuff kids into walls or bathe in the blood of kids who don’t get accepted. I’ve heard some pretty vicious things about some cheder schools. 😉 The parents being slaves part is vaday true for almost all the schools.

    in reply to: Are some Jewish schools worse than Pharaoh? #1566641
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Syag, I have never heard a seamstress complain about her wages, but if what you say is true, you should boycott them by doing the work yourselves, or just not buy any clothing. That’s what some of the posters here would recommend.

    in reply to: Are some Jewish schools worse than Pharaoh? #1566605
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Takes 2- Who will feed the family if the parents have to stay home to teach their kids or go back to school?

    in reply to: Should teachers/rebbis get a full time salary? #1566559
    Curiosity
    Participant

    No nonsense. We need more teachers like you. The quality teachers/rebbes who work as hard as you do deserve raises and commendations. You’ve convinced me. I guess that settles it. Thanks for answering my initial question with menchlechkeit. Hatzlacha to you!

    in reply to: Are some Jewish schools worse than Pharaoh? #1566558
    Curiosity
    Participant

    RebbYidd. Yes. Unless it is a co-ed school, in which case it begs the question, should a couple have kids if their only option is to put them through co-ed school?

    Syag, how do you know I’m the same author as the one on the other thread? Maybe I’m the scarred, cynical sibling of the other post’s author?

    in reply to: $15 an Hour Minimum Wage #1566336
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Making a burger flipper worth $15 means his job is now just as lucrative as a kindergarten teachers’ assistant’s job. Now the KTA realizes she doesn’t need to put up with stinky whiney kids all day, if she can just flip burgers for a few hours instead. Therefore, nobody wants to be a KTA, and the kindergarten has to raise wages on the position to $18/hr in order to fill it. Then the kindergarten teacher realizes she can just be an assistant and not have to work as hard for the same money, and the cycle continues ad infinitum. Meanwhile the school has to up the tuition costs for all parents in order to to employ the same staff. All you end up doing is devaluating the dollar and creating artificial inflation. Raising the minimum wage is political scheme invented by the Democrats to manipulate ignorant low-income voters and feed off their raw emotions in order to generate votes – par for the course for the left.

    in reply to: Should teachers/rebbis get a full time salary? #1566012
    Curiosity
    Participant

    For all those people using their offended feelings as opposed to facts as a response to my initial question, please be advised I am not condemning teachers at large.

    My initial $50k example was in reference to teachers whose full-time job consists of teaching 1 or 2 classes a day and who take 3 months off every year. I’m not saying we should pay actual full-time teachers who work 8-9 hours a day less than $50k, or trying to create a wage scale for teachers nationally. That would be silly, considering wages shift by geography, experience, education, school, etc.. All I’m saying is that I think teachers undervalue the amount of time off that they get when/if they complain about their salaries – and there’s no question that some teachers like to complain about their salaries.

    That being said, I think everyone should fight to earn as much as they can. But from the perspective of a potential future tuition payer, I also have a right to question the exorbitantly high tuitions in Jewish schools and seek a fair distribution of that which I will have to contribute to.

    in reply to: Should teachers/rebbis get a full time salary? #1566005
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Neville,
    Thanks for the concise summary. I agree with your statements.

    Toi,
    It seems you are the one disparaging others here.
    You assume a malicious intent behind the opinions presented here and continue to guilt and demean people who hold those opinions. You are shutting down conversation in a manipulative way because you disagree with the opinions of others by using character attacks instead of reasoning skills. That is just simple bullying and doesn’t strengthen your side of the argument.

    in reply to: Should teachers/rebbis get a full time salary? #1565945
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Syag, I am not condemning anyone. All I’m saying is that I think teachers undervalue the time they have off and the flexibility of their schedules when they assess their wages, and that those who complain about it should either get a different job, or stop whining about it.

    Also, while I do value your virtue of sympathy, I really have no need for it. This is not something that has bothered me at all for well over a decade. Someone here suggested I have no right to an opinion since I don’t currently have kids in school. So, despite my belief that present irrelevance does not preclude an opinion, I presented the relevance to my life as an anecdote. If I have any virtue at all, it’s knowing and being comfortable with my own subconscious negias. I am not some scarred individual walking through life all pathetic-like and begging for pity. If anything, I still have a strong kesher with the rabbeim in my story. And, despite my offense at their prior comments, I appreciate that they showed me the harsh realities of being underemployed, which steered me away from being a marbitz Torah and motivated me to get a higher education in a STEM field, so I can help support their yeshiva, BS”D.

    in reply to: Should teachers/rebbis get a full time salary? #1565641
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Syag – I don’t believe that not being part of a demographic invalidates my opinion about matters related to a demographic. Just because I’m not pregnant, doesn’t mean I can’t have an opinion about abortion. Just because I’m not a fatherless, black inner-city kid, doesn’t mean I can’t have an opinion about fatherlessness in the black community. Just because I don’t have child in a Jewish school, doesn’t mean I can’t have an opinion about Jewish school teachers’ well known attitudes regarding their salaries.

    And again, I’ve never said $50k/annually is too high. I think teachers ignore the perk that they get to go home early every y and only work 3/4 of the year when they complain – and many teachers do complain. The only valid answer I’ve heard so far is that they have take-home work, but I’m not convinced most teachers do. A lot of schools have established curriculums and the teachers repeat the same material every year, so after the first couple years it gets easier.

    in reply to: Should teachers/rebbis get a full time salary? #1565548
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Syag – Perhaps it bothers me so much as an adult to hear teachers whine about their pay because back when I was in school, a few of my rabbeim would jokingly complain on a regular basis about their low $40k-50k salary. It was a running self-deprecating joke by the rabbeim that they do not make any money – hardy har har. This seemed particularly cruel to me since at the time I was growing up in a home with 2 immigrant parents who, despite working multiple jobs, only earned about $35k annually, combined. My parents didn’t have a choice – they didn’t speak English. These rabbeim had a choice. Don’t make a decision and then whine about the consequences.

    in reply to: Should teachers/rebbis get a full time salary? #1565545
    Curiosity
    Participant

    CTLawyer – I’m familiar with both words, thank you very much. It was a careless mistake. Pardon me if I don’t rough draft, revise, edit, and peer-review my Coffee Room opinions before posting. If you’d like, I can go through all your posts and check for errors before giving you an English lesson, and then presume your educational background before deriding it. But that wouldn’t be very nice or helpful.

    in reply to: Should teachers/rebbis get a full time salary? #1565501
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Apushatayid-
    With regards to your first post: You are comparing the salary of one of the top earners in the NBA, a selection of the best athletes in the world, to the salary of an average citizen. That’s not how basic economics work in a capitalist society. Maybe in the Communist USSR.

    in reply to: Should teachers/rebbis get a full time salary? #1565499
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Apushatayid-
    I don’t disagree with you for the most part. With regard to point 3 – why do teachers become teachers if don’t think it’s worth it and then complain about supposedly getting underpaid?
    Either:
    A) They really think it is worth it when considering all the added perks associated with the job.
    B) They are guilted into it or feel they don’t have a choice.
    C) They think it’s their calling/tafkid and do it for altruistic reasons, but then get into the job, realize they need more money to afford their lifestyle, refuse to work during summers, and start complaining.
    If it’s A, don’t complain. If it’s B, don’t be a teacher, (because you’ll probably not be a very good one with that kind of attitude). If it’s C, exercise some responsibility for your life choices and work a summer job.

    in reply to: Should teachers/rebbis get a full time salary? #1565490
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Make a point – I’ve never screamed that. I don’t even have children. It should not be the parents’ business what teachers do in their free time, as long as it isn’t illegal, unethical, or morally reprehensible. Parents shouldn’t have a say in how teachers make ends meet to pay their bills. That still doesn’t mean teachers are underpaid for their time. You’re saying they just feel they need 3+ months to recuperate from the stress of their job. Maybe we just need a week of mandatory resilience training and therapy for teachers?

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 930 total)