Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant
You’re way off, squeak. Ubiq is saying that the dating unevenness is causing the problem, and that addressing the age gap is wrong because it will detract from the much more important issue of uneven dating.
As to whether or not (s?)he is or isn’t contending the age gap, I really can’t figure it out; I think it changes from post to post.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantas limited funds are available for tzedoko, perhaps the first priority should be essentials.
If you’re talking about a Gucci tie or Coach handbag, I’d agree. We’re talking about kids’ Shabbos shoes, which if they wouldn’t have, would cause them to feel inferior. It is very unhealthy for kids to feel that they’re missing something basic which their peers have. Anyone who can’t understand this doesn’t get it.
May 29, 2013 2:49 pm at 2:49 pm in reply to: Thoughts on Someone Selling His Olam Habah on Ebay #971233☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSam2, I agree it’s lacking sophistication and discernment, I was just impressed with the emunah peshutah. Except that popa’s probably right.
It reminded me of the story of the holocaust survivor who said he lost his faith when he saw someone selling (for bread) the rights to don his tefillin. Someone pointed out to him that he should have instead looked at the fact that people were willing to give up their meager crumbs to wear tefillin.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWhat does fargin mean?
Like everything else in the world, there’s a CR thread about it.
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/what-is-the-english-word-for-fargin
May 29, 2013 11:44 am at 11:44 am in reply to: Thoughts on Someone Selling His Olam Habah on Ebay #971228☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMi k’amcho Yisroel that some people bid real money on it.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI am very much in agreement with Syag and apushatayid. I think anyone who doesn’t think Shabbos shoes for those who can’t afford them are a very worthy form of tzeddakah are either clueless regarding today’s norms in the US, clueless about human nature (see interjection’s post; she gets it), and/or clueless about hilchos tzeddakah (which very much take into account the emotional needs of the recipients).
??? ???? ?? (????? ??, ?) – ????? ??? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?????
(?????? ??)
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI’m still curious to know what you think is holding back certain girls from getting dates, which “silly criteria” boys have, how to possibly change their priorities in criteria, and why a different set of criteria wouldn’t simply result in a different set of girls being under-dated.
I suppose we can argue about B. forever.
I addressed C.; the way the constantly renewed influx of boys could help is if they go out with older girls. You seem to agree to this point, which is really NASI’s goal, so I don’t quite understand your point of contention.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMay 28, 2013 3:32 pm at 3:32 pm in reply to: Message From Harav Yaakov Bender About Serious Drinking Problem In Frum Communit #1084990☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantActually I usually see Beer and Schnapps (Hard Liquor) at the Rebbes Tishes.
How many drunk chassidim do you see?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSome people think speaking ill of those more or less religious than them is muttar.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantJosh, I (mistakenly) thought you were implying that Shabbos shoes were a luxury and are not valid tzeddakah.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantChange it yourself, if you want to keep promoting yourself (or keep posting your question, maybe you’re getting your productions more free PR this way).
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantJewelry is standard, especially a necklace, and especially pearls.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThere isn’t a shidduch crisis
Well, how would you describe hundreds and hundreds of older girls, and not nearly as many available boys for them?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantJosh31, why the mental gymnastics? If a poor family was given vouchers to buy Shabbos shoes, let them buy Shabbos shoes.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI believe the mistake on the other thread was zahavadad’s and was mistakenly closed.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantA. Your point about adding chairs and players is worth commenting on because it does indeed affect the equation. The problem is that more players are added than chairs. Unless the boys entering shidduchim marry girls who were already in shidduchim (IOW, older girls), it won’t help the disparity.
C. Then the others won’t get married. Different players finding seats, same number left out. I’m disappointed; I think I could have come up with something better than that.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantDY
” theoretically be true “
whohoo progress!!!
I’ll let you try and convince me. Why would having the girls say yes first speed up the process?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantGranted if ONLY the hearing is addressed 12 girls will still be left standing, but at least the game is fair.
I think getting more girls married is a much more worthy goal than fairness.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantBut when the people choose the musical chairs–they just grab one.
Does that create more chairs?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI think the OU has a job board.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantDY both. Plus It will get people married quicker
You’ve gone off the deep end if you think allowing girls to pick first, and ceasing advertising the shidduch disparity, will increase the number of boys available. Almost equally ludicrous is the notion that not advertising the crisis wil get people married quicker.
Saying that allowing the girls to say yes first would be more efficient and people would get married quicker could theoretically be true based on the quirks of human nature, but I don’t really see it.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWritersoul, you don’t know what’s the cause and what’s the effect- and that’s what I think is the problem with NASI, not so much that they’re necessarily WRONG (they may well be right for all I know) but that they think theirs is the ONLY right answer, which locks out so many other possibilities.
It doesn’t have to be the only answer. If they’re right, than aside from whatever else ails our society, the numbers issue must be addressed if the issue is to be resolved.
I’m not sure why they haven’t stressed this, but their being correct is not only based on anecdotal evidence of more single girls than boys. Even if I would have no observation of how many older singles there are and the disparity, just knowing that there’s a gap and population growth would predict such a disparity. Of course, one can argue that there’s no gap, and that we don’t typically have large families and a growing population, because there are no studies. At some point, though, it just becomes ridiculous to deny the obvious.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantCooking with alcohol imparts a highly negligible amount of alcohol to the food itself
That’s why they wanted it on the side.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantAside from grammatical issues, the veracity of the whole story has been called into question.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThanks for letting me know I’m out of the Parsha. I didn’t realize that.
Yes, it was an ignorant thing for Health to say.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThis statistic thing just bothers me. Maybe it’s because I feel that some girls may lose hope because of it.
I understand that. It’s just that making it known and understood is a key to making closer in age marriages more acceptable, which is the hishtadlus we need to do to help solve the problem.
We should all hear lots of Mazal Tovs!
Amen!
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantBrony, although there’s no longer a reserve clause, for the first few years of a player’s career, he can’t really choose where he wants to play. The draft is still, for some reason, legal.
Maybe in a way it’s not a bad example, though. If there are 1200 ballplayers and only 1000 slots on major league teams, no matter who approaches whom for a tryout, there will still be 200 players without a team.
Also, those players who have had really poor minor league stats, they’re likely to get much fewer tryouts than the ones who had better stats (the dating divide). But having mass tryouts with all players involved will still not leave any fewer than 200 unemployed.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantRight, no statistics. Probably, there’s no shidduch crisis because some men marry two wives. After all, there are no statistics to prove otherwise, and no controlled studies.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantNo they will create more dates hence more weddings.
Do you think it will get a higher percentage of boys married, or create more boys?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI did say we have to do our hishtadlus (see one of my previous posts). But we also have bitachon and know that Hashem is the One in charge.
Okay, so would you agree, that based on the statistics, it makes sense to do hishtadlus to give an oppurtunity for all girls to get married (all the while recognizing that it’s completely up to Hashem whether or not it succeeds)?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI guess R’ Aron Leib Steinman and others who have encouraged finding ways to close the gap have their hashkafos all wrong?
I wonder if Gefen and SSA would call a shadchan for their kids, or just wait for the phone to ring.
Hint: whether or not to do hishtadlus for shidduchim is a machlokes. We pasken a certain way. (I’m not even sure it’s a machlokes when it comes to a communal, rather than individual, approach).
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIt so happens that singles events, meals, or other ways of introductions (not shadchanim) might change the demographics, if boys would meet and want to date girls older than they (or their parents) would consider “on paper”. You’re right, though, that it would meet resistance, so NASI is encouraging the consideration of older girls, within the system which uses shadchanim.
Your first two ideas would have no effect, and just show lack of understanding of the underlying cause.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIt was you who first mentioned supply and demand.
Yes, an oversupply of girls relative to the demand, to explain why despite “an adequate supply of dates”, some girls will date much less than others. Admit that you don’t understand, instead of endlessly repeating your mantra,There is no shortage of dates available and yet many girls suffer from “infrequent dating” despite their being a mire than adeqyete supply.
I’m not sure what you want with the rest of your post. Will these things create more boys, hence more demand?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMy kids said they’d prefer the Guinness on the side.
May 26, 2013 10:38 pm at 10:38 pm in reply to: Why Can't Women Get Modern Smicha and Become Rabbis? #1071611☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThe facts are they can find dates with older guys. I and many guys I know would go out with these girls.
Then who would marry the women in your age group?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantDY: apples and oranges.
Not at all. We should make hishtadlus for everyone, including the older girls, because even mathematically, there’s hope for any individual (and no one ever said otherwise). The issue being contested is NASI’s contention that we should do hishtadlus on a communal level, and I don’t see why, from a hashkafic perspective, you would be against it.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantGefen, I hope your family doesn’t run its budget that way.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantUbiquitin, you talk about supply and demand (using an analogy to products being sold in retail locations) in terms of the availability to test a product. I don’t think that’s how supply and demand is referred to; it’s referred to in terms of the actual product.
Just out of curiosity, what do you think the artificial barriers are to even out the dating, and how would you go about removing them?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIt is amazing to see that in only 5 years, it has become so normal and accepted for boys and girls to be of similar age. And this is all thanks to the awareness that NASI has brought to the forefront.
I’ve noticed the same (I was just recently at a vort of a 23 year old girl whose chosson is a bit younger. The girls’ father credits NASI for helping make it more acceptable). Yes, anecdotal.
BTW, the title of this thread is “There is NO Shidduch Crisis”. That’s at best anecdotal, so the OP is guilty of his own accusation.
May 26, 2013 6:16 am at 6:16 am in reply to: Why Can't Women Get Modern Smicha and Become Rabbis? #1071610☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantBenignuman, Avnei Nezer is in Y’D 2, 312.1(5).
May 26, 2013 6:00 am at 6:00 am in reply to: I am not in high school anymore, Chessed is nice, BUT I need a parnassah! #955258☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIf this has happened to you frequently, it seems that when you arrange the interview, you should ask up front if it’s a paid position.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI’m boruch Hashem not confused at all. I understand the issue well. I also understand the laws of supply and demand, and that some girls getting less dates than others is completely expected under any circumstances, and will predictably be more pronounced where supply exceeds demand.
BTW, you probably didn’t notice it, but in your previous post, you agreed with AZ when you postulated that the shroud girls might have dated boys younger than them. You were, in essence, agreeing that the average age gap was less. If currently, more girls would be dating boys the same age or younger, the disparity would be reduced or disappear.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIt’s kind of hard for me to make observations about an era in which I didn’t live, so yes, it’s guesswork, although if your only talking about 20 years ago, not 30-40, my observation is that you’re wrong about their not being more unmarried girls than boys.
A similar observation to the one you make, that you can’t get married without dates, can also be made that a certainl number of girls cannot get married if there are fewer boys in shidduchim than girls.
While a surplus of girls can certainly explain insufficient dates, the opposite cannot be said, that insufficient dates cause a surplus of girls. Your argument ia, in fact, quite irrational.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantFunny, I’ve never heard anyone say there are more boys available.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIts a statment of some sort
It’s relevant to the story; it shows which demographic he’s trying to reach. I think you’re making something out of nothing.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantYou should have asked.
You can still send him a bill. Just ask a shailah how much he owes you, it’s not necessarily the cost of the repair, it might be the devaluation of the car.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI guess you didn’t know what you were agreeing to (or were agreeing to semantics, not substance). Anyhow, it’s not a mathematical truism, it’s an anecdotally observed phenomenon.
Your theory is mathematically incorrect, so it simply can’t be true.
You can either accept that your observation, that the gap is the same, is incorrect, and others’ observation that it has risen is correct, or, I guess, you can (continue to?) argue that Hashem made a nes and suspended the laws of math, (as He did in Noach’s teivah), and would continue to do so if only we pooled the dates so that boys are told who to date and all girls get a fair shot. I guess on your (real?) planet, Hashem is punishing us, for not forcing everyone to date who we want them to, by suddenly following normal rules of math.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWhat bothers you about this?
-
AuthorPosts