Forum Replies Created
intelligent..these were not human beings…’v’hu yiyah pereh adam’..you call these species that can dance on the streets after 3000 people were slaughtered , tearing soldiers limb to limb when they made a wrong turn, human beings?
ps that is ‘igros moshe ohr hachaim chelek 4’ ,by the way, its a tsuvah about the femminist movement
JF2..to be oiver an avairah so one can do other mitzvos..is assur min hatorah.and doesnt matter howmany hundreds of mitzvos one can do by being oiver 1 avairah. regarding the yesod hayesodos of judaism see igros moshe ohr hachaim simen 44 (?)
will hill..a step further, if its without torah its not judaism. there is no such thing as torah judaism and other judaism. is chri..ianity judaism for that was one of the first ‘reform ‘ movements against torah..? so what jf2 is practicing is not judaism but her own thing what she feels comfortable with. we dont have our own ‘narrow views’, judaism is what the riboni shel oilom gave on har sini which consists of the torah s’beksav and its explantion which consist of torah s’bal peh codified in arba chelkai shulchen urech. also the term ‘live and let live’ is against one of the 613 mitzvas of the torah.also when one ,lets say , decides to cook on shabbos because fresh cooked food tastes better then one left on ‘shabbos blec’ and decides to do because of ‘onek shabbos’ according to jf2 its alright,no diff. than one drives car so can go to shul. by the way if you dont believe in torah she bal peh there is no torah,and nothing to worry about .where is it mentioned not to cook, bake, sow, reap ,any of the 39 melochos,why go rosh hashana to shul, blow shofar where in the torah is it mentioned to blow shofar on R.H. maybe ‘teriah’ means with clarinet. do you eat only kosher slaughtered animals? why? where in the torah is it mentioned the ‘5 hilchos shichte’ and whats called treifa ’18 trifos’. no where in the torah is it mentioned one may not eat,only torah shebal peh. ‘vinesem es nafshsaychem’ maybe means you should bang your head in the wall etc etc.November 27, 2008 9:54 pm at 9:54 pm in reply to: A mitzvah for an aveira? or at someone else’s expense? #626785
oomiss1105…mipnei darkai sholom is no heter to be oiver an issur
to joseph if you’ve noticed thruout..cantor is from ‘mekilay bais shamai and makilai beis hille hrai zay… chulin 42 (?)November 27, 2008 8:19 pm at 8:19 pm in reply to: A mitzvah for an aveira? or at someone else’s expense? #626784
OOMISS1105 see gemmorah hoirious 13b 7 lines from beg of widelines ‘loyavor bein shtai noshim, veisha lo yaveor bei snei anoshim’November 25, 2008 10:55 pm at 10:55 pm in reply to: A mitzvah for an aveira? or at someone else’s expense? #626769
charlie brown…yes , your right,i just cant even contemplate how that bocher or anyone could keep on sitting when old lady was swaying.mir mentioned once but moderator didnt pass on ..it is said in name of the holy bal shem tov that one shuold be ready to give away his oilm habeh for another yid,so this would be a sample. wolf, why dont you use ear plugs..just kidding….November 25, 2008 6:27 pm at 6:27 pm in reply to: A mitzvah for an aveira? or at someone else’s expense? #626765
ON THE OTHER HAND WHEN ONE PAYS FOR A BUS WHICH INCLUDES A SEAT THE GEMMORAH SAYS ‘MAH KIMA SHEIN BO CHASARIN KIS, AF HIDDUR SHEIN BIO CHISARAN KIS'(KIDDUSHIN) SO ALPI HALACHA MAYBE ONE DOESNT HAVE TO GET UP,ESPECIALLY IF ITS ALONG TRIP (MONSEY,LAKEWOOD BUSSES ETC. )ONLY AL PI MIDDOS CHASSIDUS
JOSEPH ..ETC SEE KSAV SOFER ON POSUK ‘VAYOSEM ES EPHRAIM LIFNEI MENASHE’..AND THAT IS THE YESOD OF THE WHOLE ISSUE OF SITTING AND LEARNINGNovember 24, 2008 6:04 pm at 6:04 pm in reply to: A mitzvah for an aveira? or at someone else’s expense? #626733
TO SYSin NYC…as a certain holy tzaddik resonded to a certain issue..’…YOUR RABBI’November 24, 2008 3:10 pm at 3:10 pm in reply to: A mitzvah for an aveira? or at someone else’s expense? #626726
gemilos chasodim, mipnai sayvoh tokim is deoirayse, to subconciously unintentionally touch opposit is no issur whatsoever..to SJSinNYC..IT IS NOT 100% FINE EVEN 50% FINE TO SHAKE HANDS WITH OOPOSITE GENDER NO MATTER WHO THIS RABBI IS..IF YOU RESPECTFULLY EXPLAIN WHY ONE SHOULD NOT SHAKE WITH OPPOSITE THEY WILL RESPECT YOU FOR IT. MIR DID IT THRUOUT THE YEARS. IT WOULD BE CHILLIL HASHEM IF ONE SEES A MUSLIM(WHO WAS NOT AFFECTED WITH THE WESTERN VERSION OF ‘MORALITY’) ADHERE TO NOT SHAKING WITH OPPOSITE GENDER BUT A SHOMER TORAH UMITZVOS HAS NO BACKBONE TO UPHOLD HALACHA. MIR HEAR THE SOME PLACES IN SOUTH (RELIGIOUS BAPTIST?) IT IS KNOWN NOT TO SHAKE WITH OPPOSITE IN BUSUNESS ALSO WHEN GOING OUT TO BUSINESS LUNCH WILL NOT GO WITHOUT HUABAND OR…AND YOU DONT HAVE BACKBONE TO STAND UP WITH TORAH PRINCIPLES?November 24, 2008 2:14 pm at 2:14 pm in reply to: Tenor of Discussion on YWN: When Discussions Become Acrimonious #625861
to mr clown….mir have a friend a rov in..who is the son of the world renown poisek…(lives in eretz yisroel)asked him he if he ever heard this savara (no erev because tznious)so he said never, it is new ‘chiddish’ from some ‘poskim’..asked him if his father ever mentioned to yes make eiruv so noshim tzidknious can go out with thier lechtige little yiddishe neshmos, so he said didnt hear him say explicitly but words that are mashma so. now again mr shwab..we are not dvelving in hilchos erevin whether it is permissible in BP or FLAT..let one adhere to his poisek(haws mah’ spellin’ mr clown?)November 24, 2008 1:30 pm at 1:30 pm in reply to: Tenor of Discussion on YWN: When Discussions Become Acrimonious #625860
joseph re:A.A CRRYING TZITES ON SHABBOS,SO MAYBE SHABBOS HE DIDNT WEAR..also see ohr hachaim hakodosh on posik`’reuvein bechori ata..’ according to him will farenfer a lot of shverekeiten bnoigayh this subject(shomrui huavos es hatorah) (hows mah’ spellin’ mr clown?)November 24, 2008 10:12 am at 10:12 am in reply to: Tenor of Discussion on YWN: When Discussions Become Acrimonious #625859
mr schwab…as you can see from the posters, the issue is not carrying or not carrying in the bp or flatb eiruv, the issue is the am haratzes of the reason mr clown said why we should not construct an eiruvNovember 24, 2008 5:18 am at 5:18 am in reply to: Tenor of Discussion on YWN: When Discussions Become Acrimonious #625857
joseph page 3 re:avrohom avinu carrying tzitzes on shabbos..the tzittes were considered a tachshit on the beged.on the other hand one goes out with beged shaino mettizotzes kehalacha that renders it posil so it is not considered a tchshut(hows mah spellin’, mr clown?)November 23, 2008 10:41 pm at 10:41 pm in reply to: Tenor of Discussion on YWN: When Discussions Become Acrimonious #625855
to mr clown..(by now you know who we mean)instead of hiding behind the cloak of non exixtant igros moshe, meran eliashev legabai the reason of not making eruve because of tznious issues please admit your made up am haratzes.November 23, 2008 10:26 pm at 10:26 pm in reply to: Tenor of Discussion on YWN: When Discussions Become Acrimonious #625854
to me clown…please refer to us where the holy igsros moshe pakened one should not make a eruv because of tzenious issuesNovember 23, 2008 6:34 pm at 6:34 pm in reply to: Tenor of Discussion on YWN: When Discussions Become Acrimonious #625852
to mr clowm (aka notpashute yid.as you say the posters on YWN are a bunch of clowns and since you are one of the posters so leshitoscha you are definately a clown as you crowned yourself ‘clown’ we will respect your tile you knighted your self)see chasam soifer o’hachaim tsuvous 99..he didnt seem to be worried about your am haratzushen chashash,and dont come with your stories that there was no chashsh tzinous those days..and we can elaborate on that with reoyous but a clown like you is not worth itNovember 21, 2008 4:32 pm at 4:32 pm in reply to: Tenor of Discussion on YWN: When Discussions Become Acrimonious #625848
TO PASHUTE YID MIR SEE THAT YOU ARE AFRAID TO USE ‘TALIBAN’ SO YOU STARTED TO BE MEDAME TO CHR..IANS..BUT ITS THE SAME INSULTNovember 21, 2008 1:57 pm at 1:57 pm in reply to: Tenor of Discussion on YWN: When Discussions Become Acrimonious #625845
PAHUTE YID ..THERE IS NO ‘KULEH’ INVOLVED..MEIKEL WHAT?November 21, 2008 8:50 am at 8:50 am in reply to: Tenor of Discussion on YWN: When Discussions Become Acrimonious #625841
to not pashut..you say..’…dont have idea what im talkng about’ we are afraid you dont..your going into the sugyeh of ‘kol kevidah bas melech penime’ which was disscussed a lenth in other articles..nowhere is it pakened l’halacha that an isha is not allowed to go out and take a stroll to enjoy the fresh air..see mesechtas soteNovember 21, 2008 1:03 am at 1:03 am in reply to: Tenor of Discussion on YWN: When Discussions Become Acrimonious #625839
not paushet..you say ‘..tznious’..adderabe, the main reason the the geonim of yesteryear held its a mitzvah gedoleh to construct eirev (where permisseble) was so that noshim tzidkonious can go our WITH THEIR STROLLERS and not be locked in all shabbos(also mentined in ‘ish chamidos)..so dont know where you come with this hogwash of not making eiruv because of tznious …November 21, 2008 12:56 am at 12:56 am in reply to: Tenor of Discussion on YWN: When Discussions Become Acrimonious #625838
to not pashut..the reason the holy divreu yoel was not for eiruv has nothing to do with halacha or tznious according to sefer ‘eish chanmidos’ biog. of hagoan hatzaddik michoel ber wissmandel..by his grandson(by the way he was very much for it)November 21, 2008 12:51 am at 12:51 am in reply to: Tenor of Discussion on YWN: When Discussions Become Acrimonious #625837
to not pushet..according to your svazra the whole concept of eiruv is batel..also tznius ..what about girls or women who have children to baby sit..so you sre penelizing just those who are in between and cant get a baby sitter..so the whole svarah ein lo raglayim..what about yomtov women getting to gether with strollers,maybe we should be mevatel yom tov?..antchuldiged but hot nit kain pshat.
TO ALL THIS DISCUSSION….WHAT ABOUT THE TAMM NISTAR ALL THIS IS HAPPENING…ANY IDEAS BACKED UP BY TORAH PERSPECTIVE NOT JUST OPINIONS INFLUENCED BY.. OTHE SOURCES?November 20, 2008 10:35 am at 10:35 am in reply to: Tenor of Discussion on YWN: When Discussions Become Acrimonious #625826
JOSEPH PAGE 3 THE MEFORSHEI HATORAH HAVE FEW ANSWERS LGABAY HOW AVROHOM AVINU WAS ABLE TO OBSERVE SHABBOS 1 TERITZ ”PONOM YOFOS..HE DID WORK ON MOTZEI SHABBOS AND BY NON-JEW HALAYLAH HOLACH ACHRER HAYOM SO HE WAS NOT OIVER ON ‘YOM VELALOH LO YOISBOSU’ THINK THE PONIM YOFOS IS ON THAT POSIK..
by the way..where to?
illini07 you are not a man of your word,how many time have you said you will not bother to answer ..,linked already few times..our words are directed to the rst just remind one should get affected..shano minos..
annon..your comparison..saudia arabi did not attack us so what are you saying ‘america didnt round up saudi citizens?
illini07 you are a reincarnate of the oigeshmade yidden of germany before the big churben ,also from other countries throut the ages (hellenists etc.)and your shita is exactly the same. anyone with a 1/2 brain can see ,es is nisht paushet whats going on since 9/11, yes it started before but that was the defining moment…the stuation is ‘vehuanoshim hiku besanvairin’ the eibister has blinded all..sarozky is also unintelligent, gaulos minded jew? knock down YOUR arroganceOctober 30, 2008 8:04 am at 8:04 am in reply to: Barack Hussein Obama, Will he Drop “Hussein” or Not? #623401
unbelieveable, this illini07 a lefty and soine yisroel(ehrliche yidden) all the way..why dont you go to a christian site. just goes hand in hand, lefty soine yisroel. also thats exactly the shito the assimilated ‘yidden’ had in Germany. besides the, the arrogance the way you put forth your arguments…ehr is de klugste oif the velt..
pashte yid, yes we have road map that guides the problem with you is your blungenig in this vast road map you dont know were to turn east to west..you apply hterim where its not applicable and aussr where it is muter..throuout you allway applie YOUR HETERIM TO OIVRY TOIREH BUT WHEN COMEs TO SHOIMREI TORAH…YOU KNOW, THIS ROAD MAP ONE OF THE STREETS PROCLAIMS ‘OIZVEI TORAH YEHALLEAH RASHA VSHOIMREI TORAH YISGERU BOM’ YOU ARE OF THE FORMER
next, cantor do yuu believe the gemmorah tanis reb chanineh ben doiso that he made the vinagar to burn ‘mis sheomar lshe’men sheyadlig yomer lecoihmetz sheyadlic’ or chulin 7a ‘reb pinchas ben yoir the lake split for him 3 times or is it just a ‘ethical parable’ (what ethics is involved here?)
yeh, yeh cantor figured you’d come up with YOUR interpetations…rashi in zos habracha we gave exact location in other article in volving your ….views.so well not bother again…yes, so you want to say his rebetzin mummyfied him just left out the ear..then ‘my kumashmelon’ of the story..aynway wont bother what we think of your …refer back to ‘chareidy weeklies..’ article may 3 http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/General+News/17562/Eretz+Yisroel+Gedolim+Reiterate+Warnings+Against+
in the time you ask all these questions you counl’ve finnshed the mesachte..learn mesachtes brochos bein hazmanim..
lesschumres..zeit moichol..not making c’v fun of your father z’l, zol ehr rien in lechtigen gan eiden, only the way you wrote, thats what it seems.intelligent also understood so. ..also ,please vil nit stechen c’v, the way you write in other posts you usually ,ahem,….so thought you want to make choizek here too .also for me its no difference wether its aseres yemai tsuvah or whole year if its wrong ..
intelligent…came to him in dream ,also became ball tsuvah after he died
to cantor b’h klall yisroel is not being killed..’ki lo sishkach mipi zaro’ only the chelek klall yisroel like you will dissapear with your heretic views,,
so cantor back to the question..do you believe that moishe rabbainus heilige kerper did not decompose..see rashi soif ‘zos habracha’..do you believe the gemmorah we mentioned before b’m 84b about reb elozor? also in sepirei chassidim by rav zevin zt’l (ok him you dont have to believe, ‘myth’ bearer)brings few instances so what about natural occurences and ..’flying in the face of riboni sheloiloms natural order of the world?
anyway cantor, who is forcing anyone to believe this story..go ahead and dont believe it
ok,ok didnt mean any harm..from where we come from thats elementary. our holy rebbe gave shiur in shulchen urech we had to learn with tor/bais yoseph..
sjs in nyc.. point is it could be true,such things occur
cantor..figured you’d show up, we stated in the other article reyous of such occurrence in the torah, also see bava metziah 84b (?)middle of amud, the tanneh reb elozors wife hid him in the attic for 13 years after he was nifter. once she saw a worm come out of his ears she was annoyed why, so he came to her and explained..AND HIS EXPLANATION PERTAINS TO …LEAVE IT UP TO IMAGINATION
to nochabocher..halacha is a must anyway…’kol hashonah halachochs b’chol yom mivtach lo shehu ben oilom habaeh”
in the sefer ‘sheal avicha v’yagedcha’ a collection of stories by the world famuous ‘maggid of yerusulayim zt’l'(hagoen hatzaddik sholem shvadron) by ‘yisroel siegel’ with the maggids haskamma..a few such stories see chelek 2 daf 148-151 2 episodes. one involves the ‘chazon ish’ regarding a man who after the chobin noirah (dont like the word holocaust) shed it all even yom kupper and his father came to him NOT IN A DREaM but like ghost in his house few times and threatened him, finally he went to chazon ish…the other was a child who was given during the war to a monostary and when she grew up was going to marry the galchs son, her mother revealed in dream she is jewish…dont have time to print whole story but both had ‘happy endings..’piley peluim,noirah noraim’ like he used to say…(warning :these stories are not for those who are against myth bearing revisionists rabbis)
i’m not sure if someone doesnt belive this story borders on heresey, but its usually ‘THOSE’…who dont believe these stories.for me its no difference if its this particular story is true or not but we know of such phenonimon of appearing in dreams,whith simonin mivhakin that it was actual not a ‘dream’..but THOSE..dont believe in the concept…remember the holy torah dvelves plenty into dreams
to nameless, remember you’ll get plenty ‘anti’ on this story like the other you posted with the girl whose body wasnt shoilet ‘rikvon’…so just ignore, whoever wants to believe let them ,and not let them not, whats the point of aggrevating yourself.
bekios.. avodah zarah 19a 5th wide line rava, brochos 63b middle wide lines.rashi both places..1st learn a lot of bekius then you’ll already understand a lot of your sfeikos
to cantor esq..we asume your children learn in PS…mariner ..raboh muvek??how does rabbo muvek apply to a child ??if your talking o of older .the gemmorah says b’ferish your not allowed…shlomo hamalech says ‘al timna shyvet minar..gam ki tsakenu lo yomis