Reb Eliezer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 5,651 through 5,700 (of 8,865 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1840677
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    This idea to notify when one gives something to his friend is to spread good feelings and peace creating unity.
    It could be implied in the pasuk in Mishlei (3,27) אל תמנע טוב מבעליו don’t withhold good from its rightful recipient. The person giving something to an other deserves hakoras hatov, good and if he does not know it, he cannot provide it.
    The Ohr Hachaim on the pasuk אני ה’ מקדישכם says that through the shabbos we see the greatness of our neshomo that even though how great shabbos is but the neshomo is greater. The Chasam Sofer explains how the neshomo is the greatest. The mishkan was the holiest place but it cannot be built on shabbos, so shabbos is greater than the mishkan. But the protection of live supersedes the holiness of shabbos. Therefore the neshomo is the greatest holiness. I made a kal vochomer, if one takes out the wrong Sefer Torah by mistake we have him find the place rather than put it back because we will say that the Sefer Torah is pasul and the holiness of it only emanates because of a Jew with a neshomo who wrote it, so how much do we have to watch out not to denigrate a Jew who has a neshomo, a chelek elokai mimaal himself.

    in reply to: Are our mistakes (not regarding mitzvos/sins) from Hashem? #1840668
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    They could have relied on logic, the kal vochamer for not checking, The money that was in our sack we returned, so how could we steal from you silver or gold? Where they mechuyav to check?

    in reply to: Rabbi Akiva Eiger’s pesak regarding the cholera epidemic of 5591 #1840660
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    There is an interesting Biur Halacha in Hilchas Tisha Beov pertaining to this discussion that needs some explanation:

    ביאור הלכה סימן תקנד סעיף ו
    * דבמקום חולי וכו’ – עיין בספר פתחי עולם דבמקום שאין המחלה של חלערי”א חזקה ח”ו יאכל פחות מככותבת בכדי אכילת פרס וכן בשתיה כמ”ש השיעורי’ בשו”ע סימן תרי”ח (כך יש להורות לשואל בט”ב שבזה לא נעקר התענית לגמרי ורחמנא ליבא בעי) ומי שירצה להתענות במקום שאין המחלה בזעם ח”ו יש ליועצו ולהזהירו שלא ילך מפתח ביתו כל היום ולהכריחו כשיצא ישא סביב לחוטמו ופיו חתיכה קאמפע”ר ומעט עשב מיאט”ע עכ”ל:

    Tisha Beov there is no halacha of eating less than the shiur. They all explain (Shevet Halevi and Tzitz Eliezer) that this is talking about cholera and about people who are not sick but there is a danger that they can become sick were allowed also to eat on Tisha Beov less than the shiur. Those that were sick certainly can eat normally.

    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1840548
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    The servitude in Mitzraim started from Yitzchok Avinu even though Avraham Avinu was told at the bris ben habesorim about it thirty years earlier. As the the child of his was in the information told to him who was Yitzchok. Being in Mitzraim for 210 years is implied in the difference between ישחק and יצחק. This was the mistake of the bnei Ephraim when they got out of Mitzraim thirty years earlier calculating from bris bnei habesorim. They got murdered by the Phelishtim and Yechizkiel Hanovi saw them being revived in Bikas Dura. This is described by the Targum Yanoson in the beginning of Parshas Beshalach. Hashem did not lead the Jews out the short way as they would have seen 200,000 dead bodies there and get so freightened that they would have returned to Mitzraim.

    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1840550
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    שבת י,ב

    There is an argument between the Meharal and Maharam Shick what comes first if there is a conflict between אמת and שלום.
    The Maharam Shick says that אמת comes first based on the pasuk אמת ושלום אהבו whereas the Meharal says that שלום comes first because it is the name of Hashem whereas חותמו של הקב’ה אמת emes is the stamp of Hashem and the name comes before the stamp.

    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1840460
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    שבת י,א

    How to dress for davenen? A person should recognize that by shmonei esrei he is standing in front of Hashem, the King of Kings.
    Therefore, he should dress the way he would dress in front of a Jewish king. He should wear a hat and a jacket. See MB O’CH 91 s’k 12. The MB O’CH 8,4 also quotes the Bach that one should cover his head with the talis for the whole davenen because this brings to humility and kavono as he is not so distracted and yiras shomayim.
    Certainly the shliach tzibur should follow the majority of the mispalelim as he is their representative. The shul can set rules for the requirement for the shliach tzibur.

    The tur in the beginning of CM explains that the judges by judging correctly keep up the world as the world stands on justice. The GRA explains that the judgement has two parts one, correct judgement according to their argument and two making sure that their are consistent and they are not lying by being familiar with worldly knowledge.

    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1840405
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    If someone procrastinates with mincha in the middle of some work saying I wll still will have time to daven and meanwhile the time runs out says in SA O’CH 98,8 and MA s’k 11 is considered forgotten which is accidental and he can daven two shmonei esreis for maariv. This argument is brought by the Nemukei Yosef Bava Kama 24 about someone having a stone on himself and falls asleep and when he gets up someone else gets hurt when he stands up. A field in a walled city must be redeamed in a year and waits to the last minute and then forgets it is it accidental?

    in reply to: How דוד המלך Stopped a Deadly Plague #1840334
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Zugger613 The above needs some explanation as the tragedy did not happen by itself but by counting without shekolim. Maybe once he established the 100 brochos, it became a chiyuv as in SA O’CH 46.3. Our costume is to count with a pasuk. See Rabbenu Bechaye on ותא יהי-ה בהם נגף בפקוד אותם don’t separate the bad from the good of the group by counting.

    Reb Eliezer
    Participant
    in reply to: Should yeshivas stay open? #1840192
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant
    in reply to: Are our mistakes (not regarding mitzvos/sins) from Hashem? #1840079
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    עולם כמנהגו נוהג – The world behaves naturaly.. Hashem does not interfer in our actions but ‘שומר פתאים ה Hashem protects the fools from the result. I think if they are worthy of it. If they you usually watch out but sometimes make mistakes.

    in reply to: How דוד המלך Stopped a Deadly Plague #1840039
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    The brochos remind us כל מה דעבד רחמנא לטב עבד – גם זו לטובה, everything is for the best,. The word קללה can be turned around to ‘הלל ק The Chasam Sofer explains the implication וראית את אחורי ופני לא יראו where we see things only from hindsight. See SA O’CH 46,3

    in reply to: recieved this email today #1840055
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    For the title of this topic remember the rule, i before e except after c.

    in reply to: How דוד המלך Stopped a Deadly Plague #1840015
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant
    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1840004
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    שבת ט,ב

    מנחה גדולה 12:30, early mincha a normal day when the night is as long as the day six and half hours starting at 6:00 in the morning.
    3:30 מנחה קטנה late mincha nine and half hours

    The RMA in SA O’CH 232 says that the custom is to allow a big meal at the early mincha and small meal and the late mincha. People will remember to daven as they usually daven in a shul.

    Tosfas says that even though maariv is voluntary, we should still be careful not to be mevatel for no reason. Once a person says it, he makes it obligatory. Currently, since everyone davens maariv, why don’t we have the shliach tzibur repeat the shmonei esrei for maariv? Maybe, since it was voluntary originally it was never instituted. The MB 237,1 says that it became a mitzva which cannot force the repetition.

    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1839523
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Should be above, most poskim view that cars don’t get included in the count as explained above.

    Rav Menashe Klein in Mishneh Halochas (15,124) quotes a later teshuva of Reb Moshe in Igros Moshe O’CH (5,24) where is seems he is retracting his previous view saying that people follow Rashi’s view as the need required to make an airuv of a tzuras hapesach, if 600,000 people are not gathered daily on the street.
    According to this ruling we can make an airuv in Brooklyn.

    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1839487
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    The Aruch Hashulchan in O’CH 345 explains that in the olden time there was a main road where all other roads would meet. The houses were in an alley closed on one side and meeting this main road on the other side (movo). The main road had doors on each side but open at nigh 16 amos wide. This is derived from the mishkan were all the tents would converge to the Moshe Rabbenu’s tent where all 600,000 people gather and the wagons to the mishkan took up 16 amos.
    Most agree that 600,000 is required. Rav Moshe in Igros Moshe O’CH (4,87) says that a city having 12 mil by 12 mil where this amount of people gather makes it a public domain considering it a platyeh godaloh. The Aruch Hashulchan says that each street is judged for itself.
    The RMA O’CH 346,3 says that currently all of our streets are considered karmelis, only rabbinical. This is the the view of most poskim and therefore we can make an airuv with a tzuras hapesach without actual doors. Most poskim’s view is that cars don’t can included in the count. We have houses on each side of the road with street lights which limit the public movement. There are other roads circumventing the main road, so the main road is not as important as it used to be.

    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1839385
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant
    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1839226
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    שבת ה,ב

    The SA YD 277,1 says that we should not turn a sefer on its face by having the letters on the bottom as we find over here Rashi explaining that it is a bizoyan for the sefer. The Bach also includes in the prohibition not to leave a sefer open and walk away without covering it. The Shach says that a person forgets his learning when he leaves the sefer open.

    in reply to: “Freilichen Tamid”? #1839203
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    The SA O’CH starts שויתי ה’ לנגדי תמיד, fear of Hashem seeing Him everywhere and finishes טוב לב משתה תמיד, love of Hashem. This might be implied in שני תמידים כהלכתם remember the two constants as the SA.

    in reply to: “Freilichen Tamid”? #1839179
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Maybe, Tamid Besimcha – תמיד בשמחה constant happiness.

    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1839158
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Rambam Hilchas Shabbos (1,15-16) If two people do a melacha on shabbos either each one does half of it, one does the akira and the other the hanacha or they do the whole melacha together and one is able to do it by himself, they are both patur. If none are able to do it by themselves and they did the whole thing together, they are both chayev. If one is able to do it and the other is not, the one able is chayev and the other is patur.

    שבת ד,א

    Tosfas questions why is the one placing the bread in the oven on purpose is chayev misah when his admonishment is a safek as maybe he will remove it? Tosfas answers that we judge as it is now. Normally it will bake. The baking does not require any action any more.

    The requirement of 4 amos to place to or remove from is required because usually a person places something on a sturdy place. Tosfas says a place is considered 4 amos.

    שבת ה,א

    The hand has a chashivus and considered 4 amos. Rashi in Kesuvas (31,2) says that this applies to the halacha that a person can acquire ownership within his 4 amos, so one gains ownership from what is placed in his hand.
    The Baal Hamoar Shabbos 96 explains that beside the reason of halacha Moshe Mesinai it is also logical that carying 4 amos in public domain is chayev as the 4 amos acquires ownership so you carry from prive domain to a public domain.

    in reply to: How Was Vashti Killed? #1839124
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Joseph, look at the above sefer on (1,13).

    in reply to: Megillas Esther Interpretation #1839097
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    The Chasam Sofer explains Shushan Purim was instituted to have learning all the time in the world.

    in reply to: How Was Vashti Killed? #1839008
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Joseph, don’t ask me any questions, ask Rav Yonasan Eubshutz see https://hebrewbooks.org/21708

    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1838979
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    We started Shabbos with פשט העני just before Purim which is like Yom Kippurim when we say ironically
    כל הפושט יד נותנים לו whoever stretches out his hand is being provided for.

    in reply to: How Was Vashti Killed? #1838868
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Joseph, the question was whether she has reached the age of 20 and she can be executed or wait another month because the year was not completed yet because it became meubar?

    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1838812
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    שבת ג,א

    To be biblically chayev on carrying two actions are required an עקירה, displacement and הנחה replacement.
    Rashi on 74,1 explains the gemora’s question וכי מותר לאפות פחות מכשיעור are you allowed to bake smaller than the measurement of fig would assur biblically as a חצי שיעור half a shiur but the Chacham Tzvi 86 says that it only applies to food because we cannot add to it once its being baked only before we place it in the oven. The issur would only be rabbinic. So the question is an akira, is it a half melacha or no melacha at all? Could be that Rashi follows his view and counts akiras because they can be completed and they are considered a half a melacha whereas Tosfas ד’ה פיטורי like Rashi’s teachers, counts the stretching of the hand like the Chacham Tzvi and not the akira.

    in reply to: How Was Vashti Killed? #1838787
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Mods: Joseph, coffee addict and myself had posts. They all disappeared.

    in reply to: How Was Vashti Killed? #1838767
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Mods: What happened with today’s posts?

    Not sure what you mean. Looks like they’re all there.

    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1838673
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Tosfas on צו,ב ד’ה הוצאה indicates it for carying out and there ד’ה הכנסה indicates it for carying in. Both cases is considered a מלאכה גרועה a weak melacha. As Tosfas 2,1 says asks what is the differents carying from a private area to another private area where it is allowed to carry bibliically with karmeles (4 amos wide and less than 10 tefochim high) in between. See SA O’CH 345 There is an argument a public domain 16 wide 600,000 people walking through does that include cars? Reb Moshe holds they walk with their cars but others hold that a car is a a private domain for itself. See in great detail Yabia Omer O’CH (9,33) about making a airuv of tzuras hapesach. A public domain where houses are on each side might limt the movement Traffic lights also limit movement. Intersecting roads also are questionable.

    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1838671
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Tosfas says that carying Is a מלאכה גרועה. We cannot argue with the facts. Why would you think otherwise? Did you look at the Tosfas ב,א ד’ה פשט בעה’ב and צ’ו,ב ד’ה הכנסה?

    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1838626
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Benephraim, first the gemora in shabbos 96,2 derives from a pasuk carrying as the is levi camp in the midbar where Moshe Rabbenu resided was a public area so they should not take anything from home to Moshe Rabbenu when tbey go to ask a shaila from him. Tosfas there ezplains that it is not enough that it was in the mishkan when loading the wagons but we need a pasuk because carying is a weak melacha explained above. The reverse of taking in from public area to a private area is known through a savoro what is the difference which direction. Look at Tosfas there entitled hachnosa which I think answers your question.

    in reply to: How Was Vashti Killed? #1838607
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    She had to be executed and not banished or Achasheverus, when he regret it, could have reinstated her.

    in reply to: How Was Vashti Killed? #1838610
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    What is interesting is that at the time the Jews were sinning with the seuda, Hashem already saved them by killing Vashti and providing a savior for the future. We say in the Haggadah ‘הקב’ה מצילנו ‘מידם Hashem protects us through their hands. Also, Achashverus did not reward Mordechai on the spot but wrote it up for the future.

    in reply to: Split: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1838606
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    The mishna starts with יציאות השבת instead of הוצאות as explained by Tosfas based on the pasuk Shmos (16,29)
    אל יצא איש ממקמו a person should not carry a dish to borrow food from someone else or a basket to get charity by filling it up by a rich person. This would explain why the mishna starts with the interaction between the rich and the poor. The rav Bartenura says that it teaches us that this charity done on shabbos is not a mitzva but an aveira.
    The GRA says that the word יצא has another implication on the amount a person can walk out of town, on the measurement of a techum. When we take the word יצא multiply the letter equivalent with its neighbor back and forth and accumulate it like this 10 x 90 + 90 x 10 + 90 x 1 + 1 x 90 + 1 x 10 + 10 x 1= 900 + 900 + 90 +90 + 10 +10 = 1800 + 180 + 20 = 1980 + 20 = 2000

    in reply to: How Was Vashti Killed? #1838614
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    The Yalkut Shimoni says that she got killed as he became upset at the advisers afterwards.

    in reply to: Megillas Esther Interpretation #1838510
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Thev Jews should have done what they could and as they were forced to attend the seuda makes Haman and Achashveis ym’s responsible.

    in reply to: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1838420
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    ברכות סג,א

    What has greater a kedusha a Beis Hamedrash or a Beis Haknesses? In SA O’CH 153 it says that you can build a Beis Hamdrash from a Beis Haknesses but not vice versa but it also SA O’CH 151,2 in the RMA that we can eat and sleep in a Beis Hamedrash but not in a Beis Haknesses. No mezuzah is put in a Beis Haknesses but it is put in a Beis Hamedrash. A Beis Hamedrash is the home for talmidei chachomim, so even though it has a higher kedusha they still allowed eating and sleeping there.

    We don’t say Amen in the mikdash because the aura of kedusha is so great there that his blessings are automatically validated. He only says that the kedusha there should spread to everywhere else.

    There are two ways to pasken halachas. One to try to accommodate the needs of people and another to stay steadfast in the customs and traditions. Reb Moshe found ways to accommodate saying thirteen midos at night and having a lower mechitza, It depends of how עת לעשות לה’, הפרו תורתיך is looked at. If we say it as written then we should stay steadfast not to budge from tradition and customs. We must stay steadfast to protect the Torah . However, if we reverse it, ‘הפרו תורתיך עת לעשות לה then the emphasis is one accommodation to protect the Torah.

    When we have many friends, we don’t know how loyal they are. We recognize our enemies as they reveal their hatred towards us, but we don’t know what hides in the heart of our friends. Having a few helps to discern that.

    There is whole siman in SA O’CH 231 is based on how to do our everyday deeds like eating and sleeping to serve Hashem.

    When we pray because of our plight, we should also have in mind that Hashem punishing us also is suffering and pray for His suffering also. Hashem is with us in our galus as it says עמו אנכי בצרה Hashem is with us in our plight.
    When one follows this, he will be doubly be rewarded with support and health.
    Learning Torah protects us also from all plight by recognizing that Hashem looks out for us.

    ברכות סג,ב

    It says Meshiach will come when עני רוכב על החמור. עני stands for the hardest maseches being עירובין, נדה and יבמות.
    The churban came because of sinas chinom. These maseches unite us when we help each other in learning thereby bringing care towards each other and eliminating futile hate and bring Meshiach speedily. Learning on ones own can lead to mistakes as there is no one to correct each other. One does not realize that he is making a mistake.
    Hashem supports us when we support His own. Zevulin supports Yisochor the talmid chacham.

    ברכות סד,א

    There is a question here. We say סיני ועוקר הרים, סיני עדיף one with great knowledge and the one who is sharp with questions, the one with knowledge is considered greater. So, why do we pasken like Rabeh over Rav Yosef who was the sharp one?

    The Chasam Sofer explains the statement תלמודי חכמים מרבים שלום בעולם talmid chachams spread peace on this world. There is a fixed amount of discourse ordained to this world. They can either be battles or debates among the sages. By using it for debates, there will be less wars and battles in this world.

    in reply to: Zechiras Amolek #1838141
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    If we take the letters after השמים – ו,ת,נ,כ,נ adds up to 6 plus 400 plus 50 plus 20 plus 50 = 526 same as שכור = 526
    indicating even when we are drunk we should not forget amolek.

    in reply to: What was he saying in the Beracha?? #1838117
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    מחזיר גרושתו remarry his divorcee

    in reply to: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1838020
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    This idea that David Hamelech said to Shaul that Hashem got you to sin by creating the yetzer hara and therefore counting through machtzis hashekel unites the Jews, as we need two half shekolim to make one, and it fights the yetzer hara as we said above that no sin is recognized when we are in unity. David Hamelech miscalculated figuring that the Machtzis Hashekel is a temporary kapara on the sin of the Eigel and just required for the building of the mishkan but it is required whenever we count the Jews. Also, the machtzis hashekel was even more required as the count was made with no purpose, so the mashchis took over without seeing good or bad. As we mentioned above from the Rabbenu Bechaye when we count without machtzis hashekel we break up the unity and the bad get separated from the good.

    in reply to: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1837992
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    The simple reason above using the left hand and not the right because tefilin we place on the arm whereas we tie tefilin using the hand. Therefore it says that we should avoid using the middle finger of the left hand where we tie the retzios on and not the right hand because we use our hand to tie the tefilin on.

    ברכות סב,ב

    The Arvei Nachal Parashas Shlach Darush 1, explains it great detail the means of recognizing when something is an influence of the yetzer hara.
    One, as mentioned above from the Chasan Sofer to see how much desire he has do to something. If his desire is overwhelming, he should question that maybe it is being portrayed by the yetzer hara as a mitzva when really it is an aveira. Sometimes we rationalize to explain an aveira and make it a mitzva on this the Baal Akedah says הרהורי עבירה קשה מעבירה explaining an aveira is worse than aveira because it because mutar and we will continue doing it.
    Two, אין אדם רואה את נגעי עצמו a person does not recognize his own faults. So, he should imagine, how would he feel if someone else did this?
    Three, a person wants to do something but he does not know if it is right or wrong. It has not been done before in his situation. David Hamelech felt that Shaul deserved death because he was out to kill him, but he was the King. David did something small to see how he will react afterwards. He cut Shaul’s edge of the garment and he felt extremely bad about it and he regret it as he describes it in Tehilim 7 as a stumble, a mistake. This becomes a test if the yetzer hara drives us to do something or the yetzer tov. We check our reaction afterwards. Most of the time we regret afterwards the wrong things we have done.

    in reply to: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1837931
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    ברכות סב,א

    ומי כעמך ישראל גוי אחד who is like Your nation Yisroel, a unique nation. Not for nothing are we called עם קדוש a holy nation. We are commanded how to act in the bathroom. A person should not say, I can do what I want because no one sees me as Hashem is everywhere and we must be modest everywhere as outlined in SA O’CH 3. A person should uncover himself only as much as is necessary. We put on tefilin on the left hand, the weaker hand, showing that we subjugate ourselves to the Almighty Hashem. When wiping oneself, one should not use the right hand but the left because we tie our tefilin with the right hand. The question is, why don’t we say the opposite. Don’t use the left hand because we put tefilin on it? Maybe, as explained before with the ketzos , we are concerned with our action here and we do the action with the right hand. We remember the Beis Hamikdash by sitting from north to south and not from east to west were the holy ark was situated. We don’t appreciate one of the greatest inventions. Just imagine what we would need to use if not for toilet paper. The benefit of softness and comfort and avoiding illness by providing the proper sanitary conditions cannot be over estimated.

    in reply to: Cures for Corona Virus #1837762
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    There is a segulah by Rav Ovadyah Josef in Yabia Omer O’CH (8,37) the mishna Shviis (9,1) הפיגם a red cabbage read in reverse.

    in reply to: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1837749
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    ברכות סא,ב

    בכל מאודך all your money. So, why does it not say בכל ממונך? I think that the word מאוד meaning more is emphasized. Serve Hashem with what is more precious to you. The Baal Haturim on the pasuk explains that this refers to the Avos, our forefathers. ואהבת has the same letters as האבות.
    בכל לבבך refers to Avraham Avinu who served Hashem with his whole heart ומצאת את לבבו נאמן לפנך you found him trustworthy in his heart. בכל נפשך refers to Yitzchok Avinu who sacrificed himself and בכל מאודך refers to Yaakov Avinu who said כל אשר תתן לי עשר אעשרנו לך whatever you give me I will take maaser for you.
    I heard once that when we take a fish out of water, it jumps around. It looks like it is enjoying itself but the truth is it is suffering and dying being out of place. Similarly when we give up the Torah we might look like we are enjoying ourselves but we are truly dying being out of place without water.

    It says ‘כל אשר יעבר תחת השבט העשירי יהיה קודש לה interprets the Arizal that each one of the ten martyrs was in the place of a shevet when Josef was sold and tenth Rebbi Akiva, a descendant of converts, was in place of Hashem who was included in the sale.
    It is said in the Tzetil Katan that a person can be mekayem the mitzva of sacrificing himself thinking of a fire burning and being forced to convert oneself from Judaism. He throws himself into the fire rather than convert.

    in reply to: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1837730
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    The gemora over here indicating the Adam Harishan was created with two yetzorim, two inclinations, yatzer tov and yetzer hara, disagrees with a Rashi in Koheles (4,13) where it says that a young smart individual is better than an old fool. This is interpreted on the Yetzer Tov who arrives at thirteen over the Yetzer Hara who arrived at birth. Maybe a Bar Mitzva becomes a מצווה ועושה commanded to do mitzvos and גדול מצווה ועושה משאינה מצווה ועושה it is greater the one commanded to do mitzvos than the one who is not commanded. Tosfas explains because once we are commanded, the yetzer hara resists the performance of mitzvos. Therefore if not commanded until Bar Mitzva there is no need for the yetzer hara’s resistance as their is no inclination to do mitzvos because the yetzer tov is not there yet to influence him. The yetzer hara in effect is dormant halachically until thirteen. The question is how is it fair that the yetzer hara takes up residents before the yetzer tov arrived? If the yetzer hara would not have some advantage, people would not listen to him. He also uses another means to influence us.
    The Chasan Sofer explains the pasuk Breishis (39,10) וַיְהִ֕י כְּדַבְּרָ֥הּ אֶל־יוֹסֵ֖ף י֣וֹם׀ י֑וֹם וְלֹא־שָׁמַ֥ע אֵלֶ֛יהָ And it was her talking to Yosef day by day, so he did not listen to her. This is similar to a peddler who praises the merchandise too much. If it is so good, why praise so much? Let the merchandise speak for itself. This behavior is similar to the yetzer hara who wants to encourage us to sin by praising its benefits day by day whereas the yetzer tov lets the merchandise speak for itself.

    Maybe, the reason we start from the great by elevating because he is more deserving whereas by lowering the small is more deserving.

    The Ohr Hachaim explains the pasuk Breishis (2,18) לֹא־ט֛וֹב הֱי֥וֹת הָֽאָדָ֖ם לְבַדּ֑וֹ אֶֽעֱשֶׂה־לּ֥וֹ עֵ֖זֶר כְּנֶגְדּֽוֹ it is not good if the man is alone I will make create a help against him. They were connected as one so, Hashem said I will separate them so they be able look at each other and help each other. If they are together, they cannot help each other. Sometimes we don’t see our sins in ourselves but see it in the other.

    Rashi sees it that Monoach did not know the halacha mentioned not to follow the wife by her going in front of him. You can go next to each other.
    The Ben Ish Chai has an interesting interpretation about Monoach following his wife. When people are learned they can use their learning for their detriment by finding an excuse for bad behavior in the Torah or kabalah. Someone said that he will commit adultery. So he was told, how can you sin like that? He answers that after he will say some tikun to correct it. Now, if he would not have been knowledgeable in the tikun, he would never have thought of this type of behavior. So, it was good that he was an am haaretz and followed his wife and not another women.

    in reply to: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1837597
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    ברכות סא,א

    על כן יהיו דבריך מועטים we don’t know the effect of our words, so we should minimize our words by davening. The Rav Ibn Ezra on this pasuk goes out of his way in an extreme detail about saying קרובץ which stands for קול רנה וישועה באהלי צדיקים we know it as יוצרות yotzros because they used to say some in the middle of יוצר אור. He questions their validity and benefit of it as people don’t understand what they are saying In SA O’CH 68,1 this is discussed. The Mechaber says not to say it as it is a hefsak. The GRA follows this view. The RMA there brings from many rishonim including Tosfas that there is no problem when they are said for the benefit of the tzibur. Some say special yotzros Yom Tov by maariv called מערבית maarovis. The MB many times emphasizes its importance. When the first day Yom Tov falls on Shabbos, the second day we say the maarovis of the first day except the second they Pesach when the maarovis mentioned by Tosfas above talks about sefiras haaamer. The Tur is against saying it by krias shma but allows the saying by shmonei esrei as we say קרובץ לפורים. The RMA emphasizes the importance of saying it and one should not separate himself from the tzibur. The Shaar Ephraim, 13 (grand father of the Chacham Tzvi) explains that on purpose sometimes they wrote it a language which is hard to understand in order the goyim should not use it for their prayer. The Chavas Yair in his last teshuva, 238 says that saying it in the middle of chazoras hashatz is not hefsak as it is unnecessary to be motzei anyone. The Teshuva Meahava, (1,1) answers all the questionable misunderstood pieces. The Bach 68, tells a story where a Rav wanted to eliminate saying it and l’a he did not live out his years.

    in reply to: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1837433
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    For the ashkanezim if someone puts on only one tefilin, says the RMA O’CH 26,2 as Tosfas here, on the Rosh
    he makes two brochos and on the Yad he makes its own brocho.

    in reply to: Chidushim on Daf Yomi #1837424
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    If one speaks out in between the tefilins, says the RMA O’CH 25,9 he should adjust the Yad tie and make two brochos on the Rosh.

Viewing 50 posts - 5,651 through 5,700 (of 8,865 total)