mentsch1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 301 through 350 (of 688 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Why are Children from divorced homes treated as second class citizens? #1587710
    mentsch1
    Participant

    catch
    “Yet, everybody agrees that מזבח מוריד עליו דמעות.”

    Relatively recent case I know of. Woman married with several kids loses her husband to a shiksa from the office. I’m sure the mizbeach is shedding lots of tears and not just for the marriage. But who has the right to judge the spouse? what did she do wrong ? and the kids?
    Compounding one tragedy that the spouse and kids have to go through by creating more pain, that’s pretty evil. Kids lost a father that they will rarely now see (if ever) and rather then the kids being treated like yesomim with extra sensitivity people should treat them like pariahs ?!

    in reply to: Why are Children from divorced homes treated as second class citizens? #1587688
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Joseph
    “And then then it can only be mandated if he was already formally warned and continued anyways”
    Ask any Rav involved in gittin how often they discussed abuse with men and gotten a justification for their behavior. Whether they feel their wife is bad for some issue real or imagined or they use halacha to justify their strong reactions.
    Abusers (angry people) feel their anger is necessary and justified despite being an obvious averah.
    Similar to those posting here who feel they can treat children of divorce badly for some sort of “greater good” .

    in reply to: Why are Children from divorced homes treated as second class citizens? #1587408
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Time
    You actually didn’t answer the question. Allow me to re-phrase
    I would like to be given a halchic source for people to act with a lack of mentchlikeit toward others that they perceive to “damaged” in some way.
    There are examples of shunning in torah. Cherem being the biggest example, but that requires a bais din
    The misilas yisharim tells you to pick good friends (hence staying away from bad friends) but you would be hard pressed to find any mussar sefer that tells you that you can act with less middos toward those people. In addition a perceived aveirah (divorce) that you might think the parents did (even though , odds are it was pushed by a Rav and thus not an aveirah) , how does that allow bad middos toward the child?

    in reply to: Why are Children from divorced homes treated as second class citizens? #1587392
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Yitzchom
    You don’t see a distinction between “celebrated” and mentchlikeit?
    no one is talking about throwing a party. But frankly middos is dictated by torah and a requirement.
    If a woman is required to get an abortion al pi halacha you should shun her? I don’t shun people for following halacha

    Time truth
    ever learned meseches gittin?
    there are no red herrings here, plus abuse and infidelity is a lot more common then those who aren’t in the know think it is. Getting divorced is often a matter of psak, despite you thinking it’s a lifestyle choice. I can easily think of a dozen cases I personally know where the rabbunim involved pushed for divorce because of halachic abuse (this includes emotional ), and infidelity (both male and female). If you include one spouse becoming openly or secretly not frum that number doubles.

    For those not involved in the scene, a Rav is AlWAYS involved before a get will be issued, therapy/counseling (sometimes years) is always required before a b’d will issue a get (at least by the batei dinim I am familiar with)

    in reply to: Why are Children from divorced homes treated as second class citizens? #1587192
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Time for truth
    Just curious,
    If your daughter was married to a guy who beat her, you would tell her what? stay in the marriage?
    Or if your daughter in law was found out to be having a secret life, you would tell your son to just go to counseling?
    And if they took the obvious (and halchically correct solution) of asking for a divorce, you would tell your grandchildren to be honored to be the victim of bias because it’s for the greater good?

    Health
    It isn’t the solution bc
    a) it wasn’t an empathetic remark and
    b) those that have bias don’t change bc of circumstance. BH I have been remarried for many years and yet my step daughter (raised in a stable household) experienced this bias despite the fact that the divorce occurred in her infancy.

    in reply to: Clean yourself of Sins #1587014
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Avram
    Interesting theory, you may be right
    no picture. just name and number and his assertion that he is a kosher jew

    in reply to: Why are Children from divorced homes treated as second class citizens? #1586673
    mentsch1
    Participant

    CT
    You are describing a scenario that exists all across the spectrum and is inherent to a capitalist system. We have had the conversation about concierge practices. Isn’t it “unfair” that those with means can afford to get treated so much better in the health care market place?
    I have seen a couple of instances where children of big donors got kid glove treatment when there should have been consequences. But I have put kids through multiple big name brooklyn yeshivos and I find , that for the most part, they practice the middos that they teach. I found that , for the most part, principals and teachers went the extra mile. Some of my kids who had issues at the time of divorce and acted out, got those same free passes bc the hanhala understood the circumstances and were willing to give them time.
    BH they settled down and it worked out.

    in reply to: Why are Children from divorced homes treated as second class citizens? #1586448
    mentsch1
    Participant

    health
    all i can say is , oy

    in reply to: Why are Children from divorced homes treated as second class citizens? #1586287
    mentsch1
    Participant

    For the most part my children, both my own and my step children, where not treated differently.
    Though one of my daughters wasn’t accepted to one high school, despite being an exceptional A student. (Behind the scenes feedback stated the reason was the divorce.) That was one school and she was accepted to a different (very good)l school.
    For the most part I have found principals to be understanding, and teachers willing to make an extra effort.

    in reply to: Using an Image of A Rabbi for Shmira #1586253
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Milhouse
    I did not mean to imply that this isn’t a machlokes
    I’m aware of other sources
    I just felt someone misquoted the kitzur

    in reply to: Using an Image of A Rabbi for Shmira #1584527
    mentsch1
    Participant

    I just looked up the kitzur on hilchos erev Rosh Hashanah.
    He says very clearly the reasons for going to a cemetery
    1) the area around the tzadik is kodesh so tefilla is more accepted
    2) it awakens the tzadik to daven for you
    3) Hashem is more likely to answer bzchus the tzadik
    BUT
    He says very clearly don’t address the tzadik as it is close to violating the issur of “lo doresh el hamaisim “

    in reply to: Hitch Hikers In Lakewood Ticketed By Police Story #1583381
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Takes 2
    Your making an assumption that those on this helig website don’t have filters
    I’m don lkav zchus

    And I’m still waiting for the proof to the supposed danger of pulling up to a curb to pick someone up. Every ones idea of dangerous is subjective. Since I follow halacha and try not to be swayed by emotion , let me assure you that no posek would call a teenage boy getting a ride with a frum man dangerous. It’s not halachically dangerous for the hitcher. And if done in a sensible way it’s not halachically dangerous to the driver.

    in reply to: Hitch Hikers In Lakewood Ticketed By Police Story #1583156
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Apush
    You realize that in a statistical analysis “near misses” don’t count? Your subjective idea of what is or isn’t dangerous is meaningless to the overall conversation. I’m sure you will point to the government analysis but as I’ve already said only 4 states have it on the books , so how dangerous can it be?
    “Near misses ” happen to every driver every day. More often from cars and not pedestrians. do we ban driving?
    Lets be real
    We have all seen countless accidents. Have you seen one caused by a hitcher? I’m sure it has happened but is it statistically warranted to ban a behavior that is easily within the control of every driver to perform safely?
    We all know how to pull over to a curb safely. We all deal with double parked cars every day. We deal with people that have to pull over to get a kid or parent every day. How is this different?

    in reply to: Hitch Hikers In Lakewood Ticketed By Police Story #1582689
    mentsch1
    Participant

    My strong reaction comes from the belief that callousness is a disease of the soul. And dina demalchusa dina has been used as an excuse for callousness in the most extreme of cases. You just need to look at examples such as stephen wise in ww2 to see that illustrated.
    I don’t know why NJ counts itself among four states in the union that ban hitch hiking. I am sure that the originators of this law had good intentions. But it’s an unnecessary law. For those worried about the danger of swerving to pick up hikers, that is called reckless driving and let LE ticket for that. Don’t criminalize being a good person.
    Lakewood should urge a change to the law. Why is this different than our fights against shecita bans etc. ? We should be a model of chessed to the nations.

    in reply to: Hitch Hikers In Lakewood Ticketed By Police Story #1582685
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Por
    If you are referring to the rabbi Mintz video , in all fairness, it’s possible he doesn’t know. The shayla was only asked from the POV of bein adom lchavero

    in reply to: Hitch Hikers In Lakewood Ticketed By Police Story #1582622
    mentsch1
    Participant

    While googling this subject I see it’s not a new machlokes.
    Found an “ask the rabbi” with rabbi Chaim Mintz that says what I’ve said. If it’s safe do it. And don’t worry about holding people up for a few moments that’s within norms.
    Interestingly enough, saw a video on aish today with a video about lessons learned in India (by rabbi Becher )
    He talks about the traffic being more chaotic and despite that he feels there is less stress. He hypothesized that the focus on individual rights in America has made us less community sensitive.

    in reply to: Hitch Hikers In Lakewood Ticketed By Police Story #1582460
    mentsch1
    Participant

    I have helped dozens of people with rides. Most are at bus stops getting soaked or sweating or freezing while waiting for a bus that never seems to come when it is supposed to. And all of them are incredibly appreciative. I got my wife into it (she picks up women of course) and it makes for great dinner conversation and has a huge hashpah on the kids.
    Try giving someone a ride some time, you might feel good about yourself

    If someone is headed from Flatbush to boro Park and passes a bus stop that is also headed to boro Park. And he sees a yid shivering in the cold, and he drives by, that’s callousness.
    Unfortunately I think this thread shows how the Americans “values” of self centeredness has overcome our Chesed DNA. You can call it being a law abiding citizen. I call it rationalization. Do it safely and be a better person.

    in reply to: Hitch Hikers In Lakewood Ticketed By Police Story #1582452
    mentsch1
    Participant

    NYOB
    Never said anything about the fines. I would gladly pay them for the mitzva.
    As I said it can be done safely.
    The “inherent danger” from being picked up by a guy in a black hat is so negligible as to be laughable (or sad that you assume so)
    Taxi drivers face much more of an “inherent danger” from every one of their fares. The hitcher faces more of a danger from you getting into a car accident (driving is dangerous in case you didn’t know)

    in reply to: Hitch Hikers In Lakewood Ticketed By Police Story #1582443
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Takes 2
    Seriously, how hard is it to safely pull over to a curb?
    Are you telling me that you have never, in your entire driving career , dropped someone off or picked up someone from a curb?
    Every bus and taxi in the city manages to do it without causing car accidents.
    I am not advocating slamming on your brakes when you suddenly notice someone as you pass them. Yet I see taxis do that all the time and they are legal.
    So please don’t tell me that intelligent careful drivers can’t do this safely. If you want to miss out on these Chesed opportunities that’s your rationalization. I would gladly pay the fine and be counted among those that descend from Avram Avinu.

    in reply to: Hitch Hikers In Lakewood Ticketed By Police Story #1582420
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Apush
    Please explain to me the logic of your statement
    Theft is clearly against the halacha
    Giving rides to people in need is clearly a mitzvah

    Also
    Other then a few anecdotal stories
    Hitch hiking/giving rides is done all the time without incident

    in reply to: Hitch Hikers In Lakewood Ticketed By Police Story #1582299
    mentsch1
    Participant

    iacrismma
    You do realize that implicit in my posts is the implication that avoiding helping a jew (law to the contrary or not) is a maaseh sedom?

    in reply to: Going to Uman for the Hock #1581137
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Neville
    Your point is well taken and perhaps I was to strong in my language.
    Though to be honest, I have made similar statements in the CR about Meron.
    Not about the kefira, but about the irony that the tanna most known for his abhorrence of bitul torah has such a hullabaloo.
    But your point about kevarim on erev RH is brought down, I’ve never seen similar statements about RH

    in reply to: Going to Uman for the Hock #1580679
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Grateful
    Do you think that if the “event” was created anywhere in EY that the result would be different?
    If the exact same “kibbutz” was set up by the meoras ha machpelah do you really think the end result would be any different?
    People are going for the experience of being part of an event, not bc there is inherent kedusha to the spot. And frankly I find the idea slightly kfiridik. It’s one thing to assign kedusha to an area immediately around the kever of a tzadik. But since most of these 60k aren’t anywhere near the kever, please explain the kedusha.
    The Arizal said that if we understood the kedusha of the meoras hamachpeleh we would start kissing the dirt miles bf we got there.
    To ascribe some similar kedusha to Uman is kefira.

    in reply to: The Kosher Guys #1580237
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Why is the OP (and others) making an assumption that the owners of this establishment even heard of “Halal guys”?!
    I am don lkav zchus
    Mcfleishig on the other hand….
    But I have a much bigger problem with “kosher” restaurants playing goyish music

    in reply to: Going to Uman for the Hock #1579747
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Neville
    If you read some of the articles online you will see that a little drugs is tame to some stuff that happens.
    I also personally know a Breslover Talmud chachum from EY who had his jaw broken in Uman two years ago bc he got involved and tried to break up a fight between two rival factions.
    I’m sure that 90% of the 40K that go don’t see these things, but I can’t imagine putting myself in a matzav were I might be exposed to something like this on RH.

    Yytz
    FAir enough
    I will grant you the point, and now understand why Breslovers would leave EY to go. But I have actually had Breslov kids come to me collecting “tzedakah” so they can go with their father to Uman. Perhaps now you understand why I’ve always turned them down.

    in reply to: Going to Uman for the Hock #1579612
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Yytz
    I know this may come as a shock but my comments do not come from a lack of appreciation for Breslov . I have numerous connections to Breslov Torah and a couple of Chashuv talmedei chachumim ( yes for those who don’t know, there are plenty of real chassidim who don’t appreciate the crazies)
    The older I get the more I realize that running after the current “Jewish” craze of the masses is detrimental.
    Be it wearing red strings around your wrist, doing the latest segulah craze or running to Uman. Personally I find that usually what the masses are running to is something that under the layers of “kedusha “ is really something fun or “easy”. Easier then developing a real sensitive connection to the RBSO.
    In either case I can have philosophical questions. And I’m still waiting for an answer to mine. Did Rav Nachman actually say that it would be beneficial to leave EY to come to his kever? Did he even say just come to my kever for RH?

    in reply to: Going to Uman for the Hock #1578982
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Yutz and others
    I’m sure it can be an amazing experience to have so many yidden be mamlich the RBSO
    But seriously
    If Rav Nachman was alive and he saw so many yidden being yored to the Ukraine for RH
    Don’t you think he would grab them by the payos and shout “how can you give up an opportunity to be mamlich the RBSO in his house ?!?!”

    in reply to: Going to Uman for the Hock #1578779
    mentsch1
    Participant

    yutz
    the quotes from rav nachman clearly imply during his lifetime. how can you call it rav nachmans rh when he isn’t alive?

    in reply to: Going to Uman for the Hock #1578468
    mentsch1
    Participant

    If you are being serious though, I would really speak to people who have recently been there. Sure you will have an “experience” but you will also (probably) be exposed to a dark underside. You can easily find that dark underside in various online newspapers. Is seeing a bunch of bad apples desecrate RH worth the experience?
    Frankly
    I can’t understand why people don’t have an “experience” in Yerushalyim or Chevron or Tzefas. If a Brooklyn shul is too intense why not sit all day by the kotel? I don’t get why Jews run away from EY for yom tov.

    in reply to: Using an Image of A Rabbi for Shmira #1576953
    mentsch1
    Participant

    yitzyk
    “More like the inevitable occasional incompetence of the traffic cop.”
    or
    more like the yetzer hara setting it up to fool people into creating a further bizayon hatorah and being oved AZ

    in reply to: Hasidic Secular Education #1576957
    mentsch1
    Participant

    MDG
    my wifes grandparents lived in this country for 50 years and could both barely speak english. I barely understood them when they spoke english. Yet they both provided for their families.
    I’m just saying that bf we allow govt interference in jewish school systems, do we have any proof they are worse off financially?
    And even if the answer is yes, Joseph would argue who cares about finances when their neshamas are at stake? and I would agree with him
    BC frankly, I am a professional and enjoy the parnasah but wish my soul hadn’t been exposed as much as it was during my MO upbringing and college years.

    in reply to: Tahara at Risk in Lakewood City of Torah #1576952
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Morik
    did you actually try calling a lakewood woman to find out how the system works bf posting on CR?
    Because I did and I’m a man.
    Yes, the main litvish mikvah’s apparently use a booking system. And yes you can often have a late appointment. But I’m also told that they fit people in if necessary and no one goes without an appointment if you call.
    Does everything have to be posted online?

    in reply to: Hasidic Secular Education #1576743
    mentsch1
    Participant

    I’m going to take another POV in this discussion
    Everyone seems to take it as a given that chassidish families are at a disadvantage over PS kids. Is there any proof?
    Frankly, my first experiences with PS kids in college was not very impressive.
    It was 25 years ago. I entered Brooklyn college after several years in Yeshiva. The course was a summer intensive science class that was the first of many required for health related professions (known as premed courses). 70% failed out . Another 15% technically passed but scored low C so no way they would be able to use the class on an admissions application. The class started with 100. The three Yeshiva boys were in the top 15%. Granted there were no chassidim. My point is that my first experience with public school kids was none to impresssive.
    I’ve always wondered what percentage ended up on welfare.

    in reply to: Using an Image of A Rabbi for Shmira #1576632
    mentsch1
    Participant

    If the story of the mice in the kerestirer book is to be believed, the protection came from a bracha from the rebbe due to the eirlichkeit and tzedakah of the person seeking protection, not due to some protective charm of a picture.
    To quote a famous Brooklyn Rav it’s a bezyon to kavod hatorah
    But in this day and age am haratzus and seeking a quick fix seems to be common practice from the masses

    in reply to: Repubs and Cons, Please explain your Ideology #1576299
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Laskern
    Factually you are incorrect. Republicans donate more then democrats. Which should be obvious since in general republicans are more religious and donating to charity is more of a religious value then a secular one.
    We all remember the great charitable giving of underwear by our former President.
    Just this week Deblasio , the great redistributing socialist, made the news bc he gave a whopping $350 in 2017.
    Besides the hypocrisy, I’m willing to bet that even the donations made by democrats are heavily skewed toward “charities” that are laughable in the eyes of anyone with morals.

    in reply to: Repubs and Cons, Please explain your Ideology #1576284
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Time for truth
    I am actually not a fan of Wall Street , I would make radical changes to the market system.
    The banking system should have upper limits on interest rates. And there should be upper limits on tax rates. Whether that number should be 20%or higher is up for discussion, but notice how Democrats never want to say how much is too much.
    As for “chazal” that you quoted. Isn’t it fair to say that chazal actually recognized the need for interest to motivate lending hence the creation by chazal of the heter iska?

    in reply to: Repubs and Cons, Please explain your Ideology #1576152
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Assuming you are serious
    We ( Jewish Republicans and conservatives) feel no obligation to explain ourselves. That’s because liberal ideology is the antithesis to Jewish principals.
    The destructive social issues are blatantly obvious. But even the economic principles are wrong.
    Our religion doesn’t recognize high taxes as a good thing rather as a form of enslavement ( see the meforshim by Yosef imposing 20% tax on the mitryim)

    in reply to: Suicide #1573264
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Zion
    Isn’t the point made that David shouldn’t have asked for the nisayon bc when you ask for it you are guaranteed to fail but when Hashem gives it to you , then you can pass?

    in reply to: Suicide #1573218
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Shivisi
    I believe there are numerous types of depression. But I firmly believe that many types are not biological in nature but rather spiritual. That was really the point of my post.
    If we aren’t feeding our soul properly we will feel depressed. This takes many forms. It might be a poor hashkafa, poor emunah skills, a singular focusing on problems. Or it might be wasting time. It all boils down to the soul screaming to be nurtured properly .
    Which is why I think the health care fields focus on “taking care of yourself first” or “distract yourself” is exactly the wrong philosophy. It only hurts the process. Helping others first and being productive is soul tonic.
    I have met some good psychologists but in general my attitude toward the field is , the blind leading the blind.

    in reply to: Suicide #1572802
    mentsch1
    Participant

    BTMODAD
    I spent over a year clinically depressed. I took my self out of it without meds and a psychologist.
    It was excruciatingly difficult. It required the most amount of mental concentration I have ever done before or since. I learned a few things about the issue (and myself)
    Basically, depression is a narrowing of your world view to include yourself and your problems with limitations on those around you.
    I disagree on two points that you made in your previous post
    1) that you should focus on yourself. I disagree, that is simply feeding into depression. There is no greater tonic for depression then focusing on OTHERS. do volunteer work and I guarantee that while you are doing it you will forget about your depression.
    2) that electronics helps. Distractions (bitul torah) do not feed the soul. In fact I can feel the symptoms of depression return when I waste to much time on a few consecutive days. I have become more of a “learner” since my experience and it helps tremendously. stop wasting so much time and you will see the difference.

    Tell me do you feel less depressed in EY? I’m curious

    I also recommend reading the garden of emunah and garden of peace
    I also recommend exercise, it is impossible to be depressed when you exercise due to the increase in serotonin levels.
    Good luck!!

    in reply to: Suicide #1572329
    mentsch1
    Participant

    But ultimately the hashkafa and Halacha go hand in hand
    It is assur to murder. Even when placed under extreme duress. No need is more overriding then self preservation. Yet if a gun is put to our head and we are told to murder we have to take the bullet. This proves that proper mental training (ie knowing halacha, living halacha) can overcome even the most programmed of reflexes. Thus , in that instant of the most extreme of duress, Hashem holds us liable.
    Suicide is self murder . Living halacha should overcome any nisayon.
    But the scenario I’ve described is one of quick decision making with a stable mind. But most suicides are a result of mental decline . Whether biological or self inflicted due to poor emotional decision making the person and thus the act is a product of numerous questionable reactions.
    Halacha looks at the snapshot of the final act. Was the person in mental decline?
    It seems only logical that Hashem mitigates the final act due to the decline, but takes the totality of the poor decision making into the entire din process.

    in reply to: Suicide #1572317
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Just to give another example of a recent conversation
    A person made a glib comment about a mushulich collecting for his large family
    The collector has numerous kids to marry off and came to America to raise funds.
    The person standing next to me in shul said under his breath “well maybe you should have thought about that af Er the third kid or so”
    Me , being the big mouth I am, argued that our job isn’t to judge the totality rather the moment. And this is a yid who is currently in need.

    in reply to: Suicide #1572312
    mentsch1
    Participant

    I looked it up in kitzur
    Hanging is specifically mentioned as an exemption, not bc of regret, rather bc we can assume murder ( people have a chezkas kashrus)
    Of course this only applies to the chevra kadisha and not the question of how the mais will be treated in the olam haemes

    But the hashkafic question is also contingent on a broader question of perspective. Do we look at the entirety of a situation or at a snapshot of a moment in time .
    The person who commits suicide, at the moment of action we can say he was under extreme emotional duress and patur, but maybe the person spent a long time handling his situation poorly . Maybe his response to each nisayon was emotional wrong and thus the despondency with which he finds himself now is of his own creation.

    in reply to: Suicide #1571865
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Joseph
    Kitzur SA has a siman on this
    As a general rule. If you can imagine it as a case of murder you do or If you can assume mental illness you do.
    Based on his lashon it would be very hard to institute halachic suicide (different burial, no shiva etc)
    I was in a chevra kadisha for a few years and a couple of cases came up. Both were cases of people that had some instability issues. Both families sat shiva and the mais had a proper burial.
    Not to mention that we know from kinnos that there is something as suicide lshem shamyim
    And a forced suicide is also considered halachically acceptable ( though I don’t vouch for it being lchatchilla)
    Ayin shum bkitzur

    in reply to: Ice Packs BURN!!! #1560733
    mentsch1
    Participant

    I’m curious
    How long did you leave the ice with direct contact to the skin?

    mentsch1
    Participant

    CT
    To get completely off topic: but since you mentioned it.
    I googled “Ways Obama violated the law” and came up with numerous articles
    Ignoring non mainstream articles
    There are articles in the Washington Post (pretty liberal by most standards) saying “we are in an era of unprecedented presidential over reach”
    And Forbes “top 10 ways Obama violated the constitution in 2013”
    I’m willing to bet the side by side comparison will have Obama winning this not trump as you would have us believe

    mentsch1
    Participant

    Plainolme
    Seems you are offering two options
    1) spends tens/hundreds of thousands (perhaps millions) on a complete communications overhaul
    2) educate the parents to exert parental control on a simple matter (not giving your children broadcast radios)
    Considering we only hear about this on occasion I’m going to call option (2) the more logical decision

    in reply to: Why are any fireworks legal? #1553682
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Lightbrite
    To actually answer your question
    I use Halacha as a guide. Risk assessment exists in halacha. And the level of risk involved in shooting off fireworks is minimal in the eyes of Halacha and therefore it is muttar to shoot them off. So why should I support more laws that criminalize patriotic Americans?

    in reply to: Why are any fireworks legal? #1553675
    mentsch1
    Participant

    Yidd
    As a general rule ; blue/Democrats/liberals are the ones who believe in big government. It is their belief that government knows what’s right and should dictate to the (foolish) masses and it all stems from me the infinite kindness in their hearts.
    So whether it’s laws against fireworks to protect the masses from injuring themselves or a ban on styrofoam plates to prevent injury to the planet, it’s the sublime consciousness of a Democrat that makes the world a better place.
    Of course (being an ignorant lower life form) I might ask how it helps society to criminalize something that people are going to do anyway and then makes regular law abiding people pay the price of running afoul the criminal system.
    But that’s only because I’m ignorant.

    in reply to: Illegal fireworks #1552649
    mentsch1
    Participant

    In Halacha the chachamim didn’t make laws that would be ignored
    Here we have a fairly ingrained “tradition “. Fireworks are legal in many places. Up in Monticello Walmart has the biggest supply.
    Suddenly well meaning politicians decide what the masses must do, but the masses don’t feel like being dictated to.
    So who is wrong ? The masses or the politicians?

Viewing 50 posts - 301 through 350 (of 688 total)