HaLeiVi

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,901 through 1,950 (of 4,391 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The clipboard… Short & sweet #950097
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Uh Oh. Now yer gonna get blocked!

    in reply to: Describing Differences Between Jews #973552
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    It can’t be stressed enough that there is no difference of religion between Chassid, Litvak and Modern Orthodox. These aren’t “branches of Judaism”. The “Judaism” is the same. The exact same, and is absolutely the same religion.

    We all believe in the same essentials. We Daven together and learn each other’s Torah. It is simply an association with a group that emphasizes some aspects (that we all share) more enthusiastically than others (that we all share). People move from one to the other without going through any initiation, and there are degrees all along the way.

    In non-essentials there are more differences.

    in reply to: Kallah Circles the Chattan #950241
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    To make sure the whole gown gets under the Chuppa.

    in reply to: Friends Figuring Out Your Identity #955817
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    He said they know him better, so I guess he’s different.

    Also, if he can convince friends that Syag is him then they really don’t know him. But his first one sounded true.

    in reply to: Drug addicts in yeshiva #951318
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    RebDoniel, any time you change a rule there will be a balooning effect right away. In order to really know how things work you have to study a place that had such laws in place for a while.

    While smoking is not healthy and is irresponsible, the effect is long term and down the road. You can’t compare a smoker to someone taking illegal substances. As far as I know, BH Yeshivos do not have this problem.

    Like everything else, who knows what the future holds and what a Mussar Shmuess will sound like a couple of years down the line. But sofar, it is not an issue and please don’t make believe it is. People take the word of fiction seriously, even while being aware that it is fiction.

    Maybe, if your story would be about a Bachur hiding his regular nicotine sigarette, that would help implant the idea that it is not normal to smoke. Think like a journalist: how you can change the world with slight inferences and biases.

    in reply to: Friends Figuring Out Your Identity #955812
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Popa, are you not this way in real life?

    in reply to: Friends Figuring Out Your Identity #955791
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Popa, who knows you better, your CR friends or your RL friends?

    in reply to: One way trip to the red planet. #949877
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Thanks. Interesting. What angle is the rotation of Mars? I mentioned seasons, but I’m not sure it actually has them. Also, you mentioned that it has some air. Does that air actually conduct heat?

    in reply to: Pasuk for name #1083080
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Opinion? Yes. I think it is very odd. Besides, most of the Pesukim given in the Siddurim are Brachos and Shevachim.

    About multiple names, while we surely use them differently than the way it was back then, the Minhag is to say two separate Psukim. This is probably because, although they do combine to make up one name, they are after all two separate parts. People often enough name only partly after someone, or add a name.

    The B’nei Yissaschar was famously named partly after his uncle, who said it will have a partial effect.

    in reply to: Come and get a brachah! #950143
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Amen. Yimalei Hashem Mishalos Libecha letova.

    in reply to: Blemished People #949965
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Do you need a source for the fact that adding a comment after the punch-line doesn’t help out?

    in reply to: Come and get a brachah! #950128
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Aha. So only Klalos work. Ok.

    How sad, that people should feel that in order to follow the Mesora of ‘being a Litvak’ (i.e. Not being a Chassid), they have to distance themselves from anything that Chassidim happen to do, even if it means disregarding countless Gemaros and Medrashim (and Pesukim).

    DaMoshe, maybe you can send one my way, too.

    in reply to: Blemished People #949963
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    I don’t think adding that Rabbi’s repsonse makes the joke any funnier.

    in reply to: Blemished People #949961
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    What an accusation, and to the wrong person. Sam2 always discusses issues logically and straightforward, which makes discussions with him very enjoyable. He was this way from his very first post. When he joined, and rejoined, it was a real breath of fresh air.

    in reply to: One way trip to the red planet. #949874
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    When talking on the phone to an Earthling, what would be the delay?

    Zach, welcome back and thanks for stopping by. Did you come here by chance or did someone tell you about this topic?

    in reply to: Fun in Judaism #949802
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    You saw what Benign wrote and you asked him from Az Yimalei S’chok Pinu, while Yiladim Misachakim didn’t bother you. That was actually his very point. We see that this Shoresh is not narrowed to laughter, rather to engulfing yourself with enjoyment. In fact, funny probably means of the fun type, which is very similar to what happened with S’chok and Mesachek.

    But actually, it is silly to parallel languages. Every language has words that other languages will have to express with many words — which is my point with Fahrgin. In English we can say everyone and anyone. In Lashon Hakodesh, and Hebrew as well — I think — we say Kol Echad. We would have to emphasize what we mean by Kulanu, or Mishehu.

    In Nedarim the Ran explained at length the difference between the two meanings. Being an English speaker, I was able to sum it up into two words, any and every.

    Fun is passive. We say, I had fun, but not, I did fun. In Hebrew, it is a verb. This type of Derush is very poor, and should definately not be basis for an idea.

    in reply to: One way trip to the red planet. #949870
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Once we settle multiple planets, we will have to deal with Universal Warming/Cooling being pushed by the United Planets.

    in reply to: Fun in Judaism #949800
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    From Google translate:

    ????? — fun, good time

    ?????? — laughter, laugh, fun, mockery, jest, merriment

    ??????????? — amusement, fun, entertainment, game, sport, pastime

    ?????????? — fun, facetiousness, joy

    ?????? — fun, prank, jesting, mockery, scorn, ridicule

    ????????? — gaiety, cheerfulness, joy, playfulness, mirth, fun

    ??????? — distraction, entertainment, fun, recreation, amusement

    in reply to: Fun in Judaism #949798
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    So, as it turns out, there is a word in Lashon Kodesh for fun but not for Fahrgin. That must mean that Fahrginning is not a Torah concept but having fun is, of course.

    in reply to: Blemished People #949933
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Daas Yochid, again you’re imposing your Chumros on others!?

    in reply to: One way trip to the red planet. #949865
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    I wasn’t referring to the 12 Mazalos of the zodiac. I was talking about the seven heavenly bodies. We would have to switch Mars for Earth.

    in reply to: Is anyone else… #963345
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Well the pda pahe doesn’t have it, so I don’t mind.

    But they should keep in mind the curve. More visitors make advertising worth more. More advertisements, more revenue but less visitors. You have to watch those numbers carefully.

    It is still way better than drudge, that refreshes as soon as the page completed loading, in a slow connection. At least in FireFox you can go to the Scratchpad and type: clearInterval(timer);

    in reply to: One way trip to the red planet. #949862
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    The problem is that air conditioning won’t work, since there is no air to cool the coils. Oh, well in that case, temperature won’t dissipate, either. So you can cool the coils with cool water from the winter.

    Which Mazalos do they count there, ShaTzaA ChaNKaL? In what order?

    As for Birchas Hachama, if you go with the geo-centric model then it doesn’t change, since the sun is said to have come into the correct position. If, however, we go the helio-centric model then the question is do we, as earthlings, still count by the sun’s relationship to Earth or from our perspective?

    The thing with Birkas Hachama is than it isn’t an observed phenomenon in the first place.

    Shabbos is discussed already by some Poskim, since it was Nogea the Israeli astronaut.

    in reply to: Fun in Judaism #949796
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    There is no word in Lashon Kodesh for nail-clippers. This is because a nail-clipper is not a Jewish concept. Really you are supposed to bite them.

    What if a Navi, while putting down his nail-clippers, suddenly got a Nevua but declined to mention that he just put it down? We would never know the word for that!

    in reply to: Blemished People #949927
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Daniela wrote very profoundly about how we are different than the western culture in that we give inherent value to deed and externals. We are physical. There is no escaping that. If we want to be something and live a higher standard it has to be with physical deeds. Thinking and believing won’t do the job.

    Outside of Yiddishkeit a spiritual person is someone who thinks and preaches. We think as spiritual someone who acts out the Mitzvos.

    Daniela’s other point, also very well stated, is that this is not the first thing that one may call ‘unfair’. A Baal Mum is Pasul for Avoda just like a Lulav is Pasul when it is split. We don’t say it is unfair because we don’t care about the Lulav, but it is the same mechanism at play. Just plain Pasul. If you feel bad for him that he became Pasul, well, I also do. I also feel bad for any Baal Mum, Kohen or not. I’m sure Hashem has Rachmanus on him, too.

    in reply to: Trolling Wikipedia #1048181
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    New management, same great service.

    in reply to: Trolling Wikipedia #1048178
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    The Tzedukim didn’t take the advice of the guy Popa mention — to start from scratch. They put on Tefillin, because everyone always put on Tefillin. Then they made the changes whenever they felt that the Chachamim injected their own desires and worldview.

    They didn’t call themselves Perushim because they called themselves Yehudim. Perushim is a title created by outsiders, who wanted normal Frum Yiddishkeit to be a certain sect within Judaism. The only time we find Chazal referring to themselves as Perushim is when they quotes Tzedukim.

    in reply to: Fun in Judaism #949766
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    What’s the German word for fun? Why is there no Lashon Kodesh word for Fahrgin?

    in reply to: Academies of Shem and Ever #950698
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    good pont. But Shabbos is still part of it.

    Sam, if you hold Techumin is a De’oraysa what would be the stress that he kept everything incuding that? The Maharal did keep the Girsa of Eiruvei Tavshilin, with a beautiful explanation of why this was picked.

    in reply to: Will they finally understand? #948485
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    She’s their mother.

    in reply to: Academies of Shem and Ever #950692
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Sam, according to what you said, Avraham Avinu wouldn’t have kept any Yom Tov (besides for Rosh Hashana and maybe Yom Kipper), and you suggested that Shabbos wasn’t either kept. However, you mentioned that according to a Girsa (the common one) he kept Derabanans. This Derabanan was Eiruvei Tavshilin, which includes both, Shabbos and Yom Tov.

    in reply to: Academies of Shem and Ever #950691
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    The Gemara in Brachos says that Hakadosh Baruch Hu wears Tefillin, but with different Parshios. So, is it Tefillin or not? Yes or no.

    Yekke, I was referring to what you said that the Avos learned Derech Eretz, while Chazal say that Noach knew Kashrus.

    in reply to: Academies of Shem and Ever #950688
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    In my Haggada it claims that Matza Zu Al Shum Shelo Hispik… The Ramban holds that they are two Mitzmos, one in Mitzrayim and one after. The fact that a Parsha is mentioned before Yetzias Mitzraim does not mean it was told to them there.

    The Maharal I mentioned earlier was about Succah, specifically. And he explained, as mentioned, that although the reason is in the Torah that is not the whole meaning of the Succah. This is pretty known to anyone who learns, or peeks into, Zohar Hakkadosh, Chassidus, Shlah Hakadosh and other Sfarim. The fact that there is a Chiyuv to have in mind Basukos Hosahvti, according to many Poskim and is alluded to by the Tur, doesn’t contradict the fact that the Mitzva is a stand-alone and has value and purpose besides the memory.

    Besides this, many explain the purpose of Matza in Mitzrayim was for the Emuna of what was coming. Avraham Avinu could have done these Mitzvos in the same manner, or as a Bakasha that his children be Zoche to these Yeshu’os. He was aware of Maase Avos Siman Labanim, which is why he was busy with the Be’eros.

    Ubiquitin, I’d have no issue with saying that he had written Tefillin (although I’m not sure what would have been witten there), but the Tanya says it was accomplished another way. Before dismissing the Tanya read it through. I can’t point you to where it is, though.

    Thanks, Torah.

    in reply to: Academies of Shem and Ever #950683
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Sam, it says about the Ugos that they were Matzos. I believe the above explanations cover Succah as well as Matza.

    Ubiquitin, it seems like you added that ‘(to us)’ because you realize there is a big difference. We must follow and can’t change Halachos based on Aggada or Sohd or rationalistic reasons. This is because we can never really be sure we got to the bottom of it. In fact, we can assume we don’t, as it says, Rechava Mitzvas’cha Meod. And besides, we don’t have permission to change what is given, even if it would otherwise be justified.

    The Avos didn’t have any of these issues. Even if the Mitzva is deeper than their understanding, they didn’t lose by doing it according to their understanding.

    In fact, the Torah was given to us. Therefore, whether we understand it or not, when we perform a Mitzva, it accomplishes what it has to. The Avos, on the other hand, had it the other way around. If they acted upon what they didn’t understand it would have been foolish.

    in reply to: Academies of Shem and Ever #950678
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Did the avos shake lulavim, put on tefillin, remember amalek, or take maaser?

    According to what we learn that the Avos, or at least Avraham Avinu, kept the Torah there is no reason to think that he didn’t keep Lulav. The Tanya writes that Yakov Avinu would do Tefillin through a meditation with sticks. This is because, as was said above, the Avos learned the secrets of the Torah and its reasoning, and then decided how to manifest these ideas into action.

    This being the case, perhaps by the Avos Tefillin and Lulav where one and the same.

    Amalek obviously couldn’t be forgotten before he existed, but the concept of hating Hashem’s enemies was around all along. This was the point of a few Nesyonos of Avraham Avinu.

    Maaser is in the Pasuk. Avraham Avinu gave Maaser to Malki Tzedek and yaakov promised to give Maaser upon his successful return to Eretz Yisroel.

    in reply to: Academies of Shem and Ever #950677
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Rational, when we learn Perek Mocher Ess Hasfina, we aren’t supposed to deduce that you can find ducks that are oversized. You are supposed to learn such Sugyos with the awe of seeing how far their language is from yours. These Sugyos give us a perspective into a depth that we will otherwise not encounter.

    Also, being that what is written is completely true, although not about a duck you will bump into anytime soon, we learn it and what goes in goes in.

    And, like other areas in Shas, you try to delve into it and take out what you can, whether in the form of Mussar, theology, Chassidus, philosophy, Pilpul, or even Kepshuto as long as you don’t run with it.

    in reply to: Academies of Shem and Ever #950673
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Yichusdik, a good initial approach to funny looking Agadetta is to understand that we don’t undertand was is meant. The next level is to not ignore the Torah Chazal are trying to teach us, but to learn it. Many Sefarim explain Maamarei Chazal on different levels, but ignoring it is not an option.

    Your suggestion, not to take it literaly, is exactly what I just did. I explained that it wasn’t our Yom Tov of Pesach and it wasn’t the time of Pesach.

    As to the Matza, which is what Chazal say was the intention of the Ugos, Toi answered appropriately enough. The Mitzvos are deeper than merely being a memory. The Maharal writed in Gevuros Hashem, that if it were for the memory alone, there were many options of what to set. Also, he writes, there is no physical memory for the Mann, which is so important that Moshe Rabbeinu had to put some away for the generations. The Maharal writes that these Mitzvos, like Sukka and Matza, are like other Mitzvos — whose reasoning is far beyong us — but it was connected to the memory.

    In a straightforward approach, Avraham Avinu had Matza just like we had it in Mitzraim. In Mitzrayim it was for the Emuna of what Hashem will do for us. Avraham Avinu was always praying for the future and his Mitzvos revolved around the future rather than the past.

    in reply to: Academies of Shem and Ever #950665
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    If you want a glimpse of what they learned, they had Sefer Raziel, Sifra Ditzniusa, Sefer Yetzira and Sifra Dichanoch. They studied the ways of Hashem and how it applies.

    Chazal say that Noach studies Kashrus. Tosafos says that Noach even added to our Hilchos Kashrus; it was he who observed that no Kosher bird is Doress. Obviously they didn’t have all Halachos, since it says that Avraham Avinu figured out all the Mitzvos. Even Moshe Rabbeinu, after the Torah was given, was still missing a few Mitzvos — Inyana Deyoma (Pesach Sheini).

    It was the opposite of today. Before the Torah was given, they learned the reasons first. If they were moved enough to act on it, and the situation allowed, they would do the Mitzva, in whatever form was appropriate — the way we deal with Minhagim and Inyanim. We, on the other hand, must first follow the Halacha with all its details. Then, if we are ready to move further, we delve into the significance of the Mitzva and what we can derive from it, or be Mechaven.

    This can help explain an apparent Stira in Medrashim. On the one hand it says that the Malachim came to Avraham Avinu on Pesach. On the other hand it says that Avraham Avinu’s Mila was on Yom Kippur, and the Malachim came three days later. But it can be that Avraham Avinu kept Pesach in Chodesh Tishrei, which is a special Chodesh, since it wasn’t a Zecher to Yetzias Mitzrayim, anyhow.

    in reply to: Academies of Shem and Ever #950664
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Yekke, so he learned less than Noach?

    in reply to: Lama Nigora #948032
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Wasn’t Moshe Rabbeinu the one who was busy with Yosef Hatzaddik’s Aron?

    in reply to: Ahavas Chinam (cringe) #948112
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    What’s wrong with Ahavas Chinam, who doesn’t like freebies?

    in reply to: Academies of Shem and Ever #950662
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    rationalfrummy, practically any Meforash Al Hatorah discusses why he married two sisters.

    As LanderTalmid said, the Avos studied what was passed down through the generations and what was added to it. They studied the secrets of the Torah. They also had a Mesora on the Halachos, as Chazal say about Noach.

    Don’t confuse Torah with Sefer Torah. Chazal say that the creation started with the ?, and the Torah started with the ?. Torah means Hashem’s instructions. That is what they studied.

    in reply to: Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 3:8 #947757
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    What Toi said, that it has to with Avoda Zara, although the Gemara doesn’t give such a reason (as far as us Amei Haaretz are aware of), Reb Chaim Ben Reb Betzalel, in his Sefer Hachaim, does Darshen some of them in that direction.

    in reply to: Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 3:8 #947734
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Can’t you realize? It’s equating men to pigs and dogs. That’s the most obvious Pshat!

    in reply to: Chutzpa!!! #946781
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    He is very right.

    Even if you feel that the direction the state is going is correct, you can’t do something like this overnight. This is well understood here in America. There are many programs that we would love to discontinue but people depend on it and you can’t drop them like a hot potato.

    They already lowered the entitlements drastically and people are searching for jobs. You have to wait until the first wave got settled before flooding the market with more. Pushing people onto a train doesn’t make more room.

    in reply to: Dikduk that drives me crazy #946421
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Sometimes the adjective goes by the word and sometimes it goes by the item. Begged can be a Zachar word, but items in general are female.

    in reply to: If all of Halacha was Given at Mt. Sinai, #946006
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    I think you left out a point. Not just Nevua and Sanhedrin. The Gemara says Kishenismaatu Liban and Kishelo Shimshu Kal Tzarchan, is when Machlokes began. The Rambam learns that when a Talmid properly understands his Rebbe, his attitude and his take on a situation would be exactly like that of his Rebbe.

    Once they weren’t Mekabel fully to this degree their view has a flavor of their own. This breeds Machlokes, since each Talmid has his own view and they are not reflecting the one view they recieved together.

    in reply to: Seeing Stars #946312
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    You’ll be able to say it when he changes term limits and makes a state of emergency.

    in reply to: ??? ?????? ?? ???? #945734
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    I you sure you aren’t allowed to eat it anyhow? What if they don’t get it? They think it is Kosher and you are making a huge Chillel Hashem by puting up a fuss.

    in reply to: PHOTO: Orthodox Jewish Man Covers Himself In Plastic Bag On Plane #945891
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    It’s actually horrifying what we came to. When we were persecuted we stood through it and didn’t up. Now we are merely being laughed at and we want to buckle?

Viewing 50 posts - 1,901 through 1,950 (of 4,391 total)