ujm
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ujmParticipant
N0m: the MO *are*’ the left-wing of the Orthodox.
Before Rav Moshe came to America, there was very little Orthodoxy in America other than MO. A sizable traditional Orthodox community in America, aside from MO, only occurred in the postwar period with the influx of European Jewry to American shores in the post-Holocaust period. The trickle started coming in the leadup to WWII as well as during the war period. But the large numbers came postwar.
ujmParticipantUntil the postwar period it was not so easy to differentiate between MO and Conservative. They were often interchangeable and the some clergy and regular members easily shifted between one and the other.
The big postwar break came with Conservative officially started allowing things like driving on Shabbos. They tolerated that and worse for decades until then, but that’s when they started officially justifying it with pseudo-religious arguments emanating from their Rabbinical Assembly.
While the RCA reversed itself on using microphones on Shabbos and didn’t officially permit driving on Shabbos or open gender seating in shuls, the reality was even until the 21st century some OU Shuls had no Mechitza and some even had open parking lots on Shabbos, even if the latter at least wasn’t officially condoned, it was certainly tolerated with a nod and wink. Avi Weiss’ synagogue is still an official OU Shul till this day.
ujmParticipantIlex: The Conservative movement in the United States was founded by the faculty of the JTS. As you are defining JTS as originally Orthodox, it follows that the Conservative movement broke off of the Modern Orthodox movement.
The RCA passed a resolution in 1948 permitting microphones to be used in Shabbos. It was only in 1952 that they reversed themselves.
ujmParticipantSunday is no different than Tuesday or Wednesday.
ujmParticipantN0m: Additionally, the Conservatives are pretty close to officially supporting intermarriage. Even though their so-called “Rabbinical Assembly” hasn’t yet declared they’re changing their religious law to say it’s okay (which they’ve already done with numerous other religious laws, including some of which I mentioned in the other comment), the Conservative “rabbis” already often officiate over their Congregants intermarriages.
Whereas the Reform movement probably has somewhere between close to 50% to an actual majority of their adherents who are halachicly goyim (intermarriages, fake conversions, patrilineal descent and over a century of decendants of all the preceding), by the Conservatives the percentage of their members who are not Jewish is between 25% to 33%.
ujmParticipantN0m: There is little gap between the Reform and the Conservatives. The gap between Orthodox and Conservative is unbreachable . For examples, on the issues of homosexual conduct (officially approved by Conservative), female clergy (officially approved by Conservative), driving and violating Shabbos (officially approved by Conservative), eating non-kosher out of the home (officially approved by Conservative), etc. Conservative is a completely different religion from Judaism (what they call Orthodox) just as Reform is.
The Conservative and Reform each accept each other’s fake pseudo-“conversions”, whereas the Orthodox rejects the “conversions” of both the Conservative and Reform — and deems them all as remaining Gentile.
And Mr. Saul Lieberman from the JTS was the biggest apostate of them all.
ujmParticipantIlex: What you’re basically saying is that JTS was originally Modern Orthodox but later switched to Conservative. If that is true, that furthers my previous point regarding comparing MO Jews in JTS who went Conservative, to nowadays where MO Jews moved to Open Orthodox.
But the problem with your view is that the JTS itself was named after, and modeled on, the Reform/Conservative Jewish Theological Seminary of Germany led by Zecharias Frankel. The truth is that the Conservative movement in America was started jointly by the left-wing of the Orthodox movement together with the right-wing of the Reform movement. This explains how some of the same rabbis who founded the Orthodox Union (OU) also founded the JTS. Some of their fellow founding fathers in the JTS were Reform rabbis.
Indeed, in the early years of the Conservative movement there was a lot of cross-over, and often little differences, between Modern Orthodox and Conservative. Even as late as 1997 there were still seven OU Shuls that had no Mechitza.
ujmParticipantIlex: Explain the fact that the OU and the JTS share the same founding fathers.
ujmParticipantSquare and Moshe: Explain the fact that the OU and the JTS share the same founding fathers.
ujmParticipantDaMoshe, in the United States the Conservative movement was an offshoot of the MO movement. As earlier mentioned, many of the same rabbis that founded the Orthodox Union (OU) also founded the Conservative Jewish Theological Seminary.
So-called Chareidim never existed as a term until the MO made their seperatist movement within Orthodoxy. After the MO came into existence, the traditional Orthodox who never left or changed got their moniker of Chareidim, a term coined by outsiders. Chareidim are simply what was originally called Orthodox, just like the Orthodox are simply what was called Judaism before the breakaway Reform movement came about. The name Orthodox was also imposed on us by the non-Orthodox.
June 16, 2023 4:37 pm at 4:37 pm in reply to: The most pressing issue facing the Jewish community in 2023 #2200493ujmParticipantOnly the poster who calls himself Yabia Omer, but is by his own admission not a Sephardi — even though he believes Ashkenazim like himself are the root of all evil — can authoritatively tell us what “The most pressing issue facing the Jewish community in 2023” is.
Or at least he can, certainly, tell us what is NOT the most pressing issue facing the Jewish community in 2023.
In five and a half months he will be back to inform us all what The most pressing issue facing the Jewish community in 2024 is.
Please do not sully him with Jewish years. His count is based on a certain individual who was allegedly born the number of years ago that Mr. Omer uses for his reference and count.
June 16, 2023 1:50 am at 1:50 am in reply to: Chabad Inspires all Jews to Yearn for Mashiach #2200345ujmParticipantDaMoshe, it is a halacha that a Rov’s son gets priority over everyone else in taking over his deceased father’s rabbinical position. I’ve cited the Halachic sources on this forum in the past. It has nothing to do with Chasidim.
June 16, 2023 1:50 am at 1:50 am in reply to: Chabad Inspires all Jews to Yearn for Mashiach #2200344ujmParticipantDaMoshe, can you please show me a source from anyone before the Rav Yisroel Salanter ztl who says anything about Mussar as Rav Yisroel Salanter explained it?
ujmParticipantN0m: if you were around 100 years ago, when the Conservative movement was starting to, slowly but surely, break off from the MO movement, would you have been saying then about the Conservative movement what you are saying now how we should deal with the OO movement?
June 16, 2023 1:49 am at 1:49 am in reply to: Bridging the Gap Between The Torah World and MO #2200341ujmParticipant“The rabbi said obviously you can’t eat the meat, but the cold food shouldn’t be a problem and that includes the salads”
That’s the kind of “rabbi” that would tell someone “obviously don’t eat the pork they serve, since that’s very not kosher, but you can eat the lobster, since that’s less of a problem.”
ujmParticipantN0m:
1. What basis do you have to claim that the RCA “was not happy to keep him” (despite actually keeping him)?
2. Which other members “they wished they didn’t have to deal with” and why? Why didn’t they expel those members?
3. “Agudah was no more than press release.” Agudah couldn’t expel Mr. Weiss from the RCA. What more do you think the Gedolei Yisroel on the Moetzes could have done than register a מְחָאָה?
4. “The Yated and Cross Currents did nothing constructive either.” What do you think they should have done?
June 14, 2023 2:58 pm at 2:58 pm in reply to: The Unjust imprisonment and treatment of Jews imprisoned in Israel #2199741ujmParticipantYseribus: Are you justifying jackbooted Israeli prison guards giving Jewish prisoners only pork every day? That would be no different than what doom777 described happening.
There is absolutely no justification whatsoever to forcing Jewish prisoners to eat treif, violate Shabbos or force them to do other aveiras. Even if they were completely guilty of violating some Israeli law.
Additionally, the Zionists put Jews in prison BEFORE trial and before conviction. Some are innocent. Some of the innocent may even be found not guilty in the Zionist court, even if you disregard false convictions and unjust and inhumane laws.
June 14, 2023 2:57 pm at 2:57 pm in reply to: Is YU officially a modern-Orthodox institution? #2199736ujmParticipantubiq: Let me inform you otherwise. You likely exaggerate the mishkov zochor frequency and you might underestimate the eishes ish instances. (Speak to Rabbonim in the parsha and they can sadly inform you what’s going on.) Most otherwise frum men with SSA do not engage in mishkov zochor. And, likewise, most otherwise frum men with a taaiva for eishes ish do not engage in that.
According to current secular scientific surveys, 2% of men are exclusively homosexual. (I’d very strongly argue for several very good reasons that stat is a gross exaggeration, but for purposes of our discussion we’ll go with this figure.) Assuming 2% of frum men have exclusive SSA, we can also count on that most of those frum men refrain from mishkav zochor, given the terrible sin it is. Same with eishes ish. But eishes ish is a taaiva of the other 98% of men. So it is approximately 50 men with eishes ish taaivos to every 1 man with exclusive homosexual taaivos. (Again, approximately. Don’t get hung up whether it’s 50 to 1 or if it is 47 to 1 or whatever.) Even if you assume more men with exclusive SSA sin than other men, given such a huge disparity in comparative starting populations, the larger percentage of SSA sinners will still be a vastly smaller number of actual persons than the smaller percentage of non-SSA (exclusive) sinners.
P.S. Chazal say that a special taaiva for eishes ish (rather than for other single women) is definitely a thing that exists, and is not a negligible taaiva. But this Chazal isn’t even necessary to consider to accept my preceding points. It’s just another cherry on the top.
June 14, 2023 7:17 am at 7:17 am in reply to: Chabad Inspires all Jews to Yearn for Mashiach #2199555ujmParticipantmdd: The shitta of some to not to eat in a Sukka on Shmini Atzeres, predates the existence of Chasidus.
ujmParticipantfakenews: Perhaps to you “doing drugs” might mean taking tylenol for a headache. To many others it probably connotes narcotics abuse.
June 13, 2023 11:03 pm at 11:03 pm in reply to: Is YU officially a modern-Orthodox institution? #2199522ujmParticipantubiq: You really think more men sin with mishkav zochor than sin with eishes ish?
ujmParticipantDear N0m:
The RCA was very happy to keep Mr. Weiss as a rabbinical member of their fraternity for as long as he liked. Indeed, Weiss remained a RCA member long long after he publicly became an apostate. In fact, the *only* reason Avi isn’t currently an RCA member is because he chose to not pay the RCA annual membership renewal. Until a short time ago he was still a RCA rabbi and the RCA continued to keep him on their rabbinical rosters indefinitely, or as long as Weiss wanted to remain a RCA member. The RCA itself not only never expelled him, they never even objected to his constant and repeated trampling of the Torah HaKedosha.
In fact, some of the OO leadership are *still* rabbinical members of the RCA today. Mr. Weiss’ synagogue in the Bronx is *still* an official OU Shul, despite Weiss bringing Christian pastors into his synagogue and himself conducting inter-denominational services (both with Christian and with Reform.) And Yeshiva University, where Avi was previously employed on their rabbinical staff, too, has not yet renounced Mr. Weiss.
ujmParticipantHas the RCA yet issued a statement regarding the heretical activities of their long-standing RCA member Avi Weiss?
June 13, 2023 4:25 pm at 4:25 pm in reply to: The Unjust imprisonment and treatment of Jews imprisoned in Israel #2199403ujmParticipantSKD2128: Welcome to the Zionist Entity. Everything you’ve described, plus much worse, has been ongoing in the non-Jewish State since 1948.
June 13, 2023 4:25 pm at 4:25 pm in reply to: Is YU officially a modern-Orthodox institution? #2199392ujmParticipantubiq: So they don’t need support? Many men have difficulty with it despite that outlet. In fact many more men have difficulty with eishes ish, despite its outlet, than men who have difficulty with mishkav zochor.
June 13, 2023 2:15 pm at 2:15 pm in reply to: Is YU officially a modern-Orthodox institution? #2199317ujmParticipantubiq: Do you, similarly, believe it would be a good idea for “Yeshiva” University to establish, in addition to its current mishkav zochor club, an eishes ish club? The latter, as you surely know, has many more men with that taaiva, than the former.
ujmParticipantAvira, are there any other than the two you cited?
June 12, 2023 8:38 pm at 8:38 pm in reply to: Is YU officially a modern-Orthodox institution? #2199117ujmParticipantubiq: Even if it doesn’t lead to more people practicing toeiva, condoning, supporting, normalizing and legitimizing those who already practice toeiva is disgusting and kneged haTorah.
ujmParticipant“Also, I still have no idea what the original vent was.”
Check the Wayback Machine.
ujmParticipantDaMoshe: In the example you just gave, if the person never says anything, never discusses the issue and doesn’t utter a word to people about it, it is very highly unlikely anyone else will say anything to him.
ujmParticipantGadol — Here’s the original comments:
For the full, untruncated, OP, go to the Wayback Machine.
June 12, 2023 9:04 am at 9:04 am in reply to: Bridging the Gap Between The Torah World and MO #2198845ujmParticipantN0m: That’s the point. JTS started as Modern Orthodox. With time they became Barely Orthodox. And eventually they are what they’re now, Not Orthodox.
Same as the sub-MO group Open Orthodox did a century later. The OO started within the YU/RCA/OU world, where some are still affiliated.
ujmParticipantHangout and frum are contradictions to each other. Especially for girls.
ujmParticipantFrumguy: Any vehicle for tzedaka is most praiseworthy.
ujmParticipantDaMoshe: How would anyone even know someone else has SSA if that person doesn’t act upon it, doesn’t advertise it and doesn’t parade it?
The example you gave only applies to the very very limited examples of someone like a therapist or religious leader who he privately confides to while seeking help in not acting upon his SSA.
ujmParticipantNo one is bothered by people who have SSA but never act upon that attraction, never advertise that attraction, never publicly discuss that attraction. The idea that anyone holds anything against anyone else who has SSA is a fig leaf, red herring and strawman.
The issue, and only issue, is those who any upon said attraction. Or parade it. Or try to normalize it.
June 9, 2023 1:03 pm at 1:03 pm in reply to: Bridging the Gap Between The Torah World and MO #2198323ujmParticipantDo not forget that some of the founders of the Conservative Jewish Theological Seminary were also the founders of the MO Orthodox Union. The idea that those on or between the borderlines of Torah Judaism flirting with the other side of the border eventually go over the border, first tippy-toe but eventually full throttle, has proven itself throughout Jewish history.
ujmParticipantNeville: Population statistics wise there are more Chasidim than all non-Chasidish frum combined. This is even true individually in the United States, in Israel and in Europe. Twenty five years ago this wasn’t the case. But mainly as a result of the comparatively much larger Chasidish birth rate, at this time the stats are what they are.
Even Lakewood is becoming more and more Chasidish. (Certainlly not a majority in Lakewood — yet.) And I don’t mean BMG bochorim who “shtam” from Hungarian type families. I’m referring to actual Shtreimal wearing Yidden.
ujmParticipant“All “Litvishe” today are either full blooded Hungarians, Romanians, Yekkes or a mix. Almost all minus the Yekkes and Oberlanders shtam from Chassidim. They just learned in “Litvish” yeshivos.
But real blue blooded “Litivise” barely exist. Same with the Poilisher. Almost the whole Ger Chassidus hails from Hungary etc.”
The Yekkes seem to have almost/mostly disappeared over the last 35 years. You barely see any Yekke bochorim wearing a Talis, whereas in ’80s and even in the ’90s you saw a lot of them in shuls all over the place. They seem to have mostly merged into the Litvish/Yeshivish world.
As far as Oberlanders, a huge portion (perhaps most) of prewar Hungarian Yidden WERE Oberlander. Over the last 35 years a huge portion (most?) Oberlanders started identifying as Chasidish. Look at Vien (where their Williamsburg Beis Medrash switched from Nusach Ashkenaz to Nusach Sefard just in the last 15 years or so) where their Rov now is referred to as a Rebbe and wears a Shtreimal, as do the vast majority of Vieners. Also look at Matersdorf/Yeshiva Ch’san Sofer. But a significant portion of Oberlanders also started identifying as Litvish. There are still a few who still identify as Oberlanders proper.
ujmParticipantChristie is a social liberal. And Christie has zero chance.
ujmParticipantKeep in mind that the first toeiva is a capital crime where the perpetrator is put to death, whereas the second toeiva the perpetrator has to pay a monetary fine to his victim.
ujmParticipant“what is the difference between a ketuba and a prenup?”
The first came from Chazal. The latter came from idiots.
ujmParticipant*sigh*. HaGaon HaRav Elya Svei ztvk’l answered the OP decades ago.
Speech from HaRav Elya Svei:
It says further, in Targum Yonoson, that one should not be a false witness. I want to stop here. In public life here in Brooklyn, there is false testimony. We have merited, through blood and sweat and with the Almighty’s help, to establish large Yeshivos for the boys and Bais Yaakovs for the girls. And these schools produced students of whom all can be proud. But then someone comes and says that they are still incomplete. When the boys go out of the Yeshiva, they are still not finished — they still need more studies: they still have to go to “Touro College” to be well-rounded. That is the biggest false testimony against the Torah. The boys do not need such “completeness”.
One is not allowed to be friends with them! One is not allowed to be partners with them! What will be with our children? From where will our great Torah leaders come? From Touro College they will not come! And mothers of Gedolei Torah will also not come from Touro College, because the Gemorah says that to merit children who will become Gedolei Yisroel, one has to have modesty. And modesty cannot be acquired in Touro College!
June 5, 2023 12:46 pm at 12:46 pm in reply to: Bridging the Gap Between The Torah World and MO #2195796ujmParticipantSimcha: Cholov Yisroel is NOT a Chumra. Cholov Stam is a Kula. (Even the poskim that permit use of this Kula acknowledge that it is a Kula.) And not all poskim hold it is a valid Kula. In which case, to them, Cholov Stam is Cholov Akum and thus unkosher. If they hold it isn’t a valid Kula, they are prohibited from even facilitating or helping another Jew obtain Cholov Stam, even if the other fellow does use the Kula.
Your comparison to Beis Hillel/Beis Shammai is mistaken. A more apt comparison would be the MO Jew telling a Chareidi that you cannot eat the food from my home since my keilim were used to make Cholov Stam food and/or I used my pots and pans, dishes and utensils with food products using hechsheirim that you hold isn’t acceptable. Therefore I’ll feed you with prepackaged food with a heimishe hechsher and I’ll serve it to you on paper good and plastic utensils.
Beis Shammai certainly would not loan Beis Hillel keilim that Beis Shammai held is tamei since a) they wouldn’t keep such keilim and b) even if they had it, they hold it is tamei so they are prohibited to facilitate another Jew using it.
June 4, 2023 8:57 pm at 8:57 pm in reply to: Bridging the Gap Between The Torah World and MO #2195603ujmParticipantAAQ: Yet a Yid who doesn’t eat Cholov Akum cannot give it to a Jew who eats Cholov Stam, since according to the poskim who forbid it, and who he holds by, halachicly deem it to be Cholov Akum/treif, as they do not subscribe to the Kula of Cholov Stam.
June 4, 2023 5:01 pm at 5:01 pm in reply to: Bridging the Gap Between The Torah World and MO #2195538ujmParticipantDaMoshe: Yeshivish people do not demand the MO stop having mixed seating. But do not expect Yeshivish or Chasidish friends or family to attend your weddings if it is mixed seating. They do not have to, should not and will not, compromise their “chumra” to make you happy.
And don’t expect them to eat from your house, with your cholov stam and hechsheirim they do not rely on. Or come into your neighborhood where the women are running around in short skirts and shirts. Or attend your shiurim where your rabbis preach wrongheaded hashkofos.
And the fellow who threw out the Hershey’s chocolate holds it is treif, per the psak of his posek. So he cannot give it to someone else, even if the other fellow holds otherwise. It isn’t a chumra. It is halacha, even if you disagree.
ujmParticipanthuju: If it was Trump against Pol Pot, would that be enough for you to switch your vote to Trump?
ujmParticipantYes. The Living Torah Museum in Boro Park.
ujmParticipantThere’s an old concept of a parent telling a child “no”.
Even if it has gone out of style in America.
May 31, 2023 7:09 pm at 7:09 pm in reply to: Bridging the Gap Between The Torah World and MO #2194582ujmParticipantN0m: Only a tiny percentage of the Yeshivish/Chasidish population switched to MO. Whereas there is a huge percentage of MO who now identify with the Yeshivish community. As I mentioned, in virtually every Yeshivish Shul, Yeshiva and minyanim you’ll find very many former MO people. You do not find a significant population of former Yeshivish/Chasidish in MO schools or shuls. (And if you want to consider the OTD rate, the MO OTD rate is more than 10 times higher proportionally than the Yeshivish/Chasidish OTD rate.)
As far as your point that many MO people openly violate Halacha but, you claim, that by Yeshivish/Chasidish some publicly adhere to the Mitzvos, but when in private don’t, there’s two pertienent points:
1. You have no basis to claim that there’s any statistically significant percentage who publicly are frum but when no one is looking aren’t.
2. It is far far better a person be publicly Mitzvah adherent, even if in private he isn’t, than for a person to simply disregard Mitzvos even in public and openly and shamelessly violate the Torah.
-
AuthorPosts