ujm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 151 through 200 (of 4,819 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The antizionism amongst religious Jews has no legitimate detractors #2370728
    ujm
    Participant

    Chaim87 / 1a2b3c: For Rav Wolfson’s position on Zionism, listen to the recording titled “Rav Moshe Wolfson: Korach was a Zionist”, which audio is available under that title on youtube.

    in reply to: Hi I’m back 3.0 #2370595
    ujm
    Participant

    Chabad Shlucha: Who is this mysterious person who physically abused you to the brink of death? Was it some anti-feminist upset at your loud and proud public expressions of being a militant feminist?

    in reply to: The antizionism amongst religious Jews has no legitimate detractors #2370408
    ujm
    Participant

    Catch Yourself: Rav Samson Raphael Hirsch was explicitly and expressly anti-Zionist.

    in reply to: Shidduch Crisis Idea #2369961
    ujm
    Participant

    Lmaanachai: The problem here isn’t the diagnosis; the problem is the proposed solution. Urging girls to wait and get married older is a non-starter. It goes against Halacha and Yiddishkeit.

    And it goes against the interest of each yochid, each young Bas Yisroel. If an individual girl delays trying to get married, she significantly increases the likelihood of making herself into the victim who eventually won’t be able to find anyone to marry.

    The only real solution is to encourage the boys to marry younger. They should start considering shidduchim, at the latest, at ages 17, 18, or 19. Hopefully they can be married by time they’re 18 to 21.

    The other potential solution, and you’re going to either laugh (like Menachem already did above) or scream (like Gadolhadofi is going to as soon as he reads this), is “plural marriage” (a/k/a polygamy). Non-Ashkenazim (Sefardim, Teimanim, Mizrachim, and any other non-Ashkenazim) can do so immediately. Ashkenazim, of course, have the Cherem. But Rabbeinu Gershom put an expiration date on it — which has passed already. Now, the later Rabbonim decided to extend it past its original expiration date. But just like the Rabbonim extended it then, the Rabbonim can end it now, if they today decide that Klal Yisroel needs plural marriage for our benefit.

    And as the shidduch crisis of there being much more girls than boys in the shidduch parsha makes clear, if a small minority of the fewer boys took two wives instead of just one, it would quickly resolve this shidduch problem for the girls.

    in reply to: Shidduch Crisis Idea #2369293
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Shidduch Crisis Idea #2369280
    ujm
    Participant

    SB613: Your point does have some logic but it isn’t persuasive since halacha itself says, both, to get married younger as well as to wait for an older sibling. Waiting for an older sibling isn’t a newfangled svara; it is brought down in the seforim hakedoshim. Halacha doesn’t say to get married older for societal reasons. (In fact, as we acknowledged, halacha says to get married younger.)

    (As an aside, it is also interesting to observe that it is usually the same people who will push for getting married older that will also push for not waiting for an older sibling.)

    in reply to: Shidduch Crisis Idea #2368992
    ujm
    Participant

    Lmaanachai: How are you going to draw a line between who is “Chasidish” and who is “Litvish”? Many many people don’t neatly fit into only one category. For example, those who are sometimes called “Heimish” could be more Chasidish leaning or more Litvish leaning, but not really either. There’s the Oberlanders, who most are more Chasidish leaning, but not Chasidish and not Litvish. They might even daven Nusach Ashkenaz while wearing an up-hat (or even a shtreimal). The Yekkes are neither Litvish nor Chasidish. Same with the Sefardic. And Teimanim. And Mizrachim. And what about the Yeshivish? A large portion, perhaps even a majority, shtam from Hungarian or Polish or other non-Litvish backgrounds.

    When you have young girls getting engaged, if your proposal became reality, they’ll simply self-identify as non-Litvish.

    My contention is that there’s no real way to implement this idea. If it were tried to be implemented, almost anyone who wanted to get around it would have so many loopholes to blast through.

    And there will be wedding halls that will cater to young Kallahs, without them penalizing them, monetarily or otherwise.

    in reply to: Sorry, you must be logged in to comment. #2368866
    ujm
    Participant

    Yes, this website (WordPress for the main site and bbPress for the CR) is as buggy as they get.

    I’ve had the same experience for the last few months. Duvi’s probably did some “update” around that time.

    in reply to: Ya’amod! #2368595
    ujm
    Participant

    Correct me if I’m mistaken, but… I don’t think Reb Wolf ever stopped talking during leining!

    in reply to: Shidduch Crisis Idea #2368241
    ujm
    Participant

    There’s no way to enforce this idea. The wedding halls won’t go along, because (among other reasons, one reason being the) unless *every* hall agreed then no hall will agree. And every hall will not agree. Chasidim, by design, get married at ages 17, 18, 19 etc. And the Chasidish halls will never agree. And they’ll be other halls, not Chasidish, that will choose to profit rather than agree, by getting more business by not having this rule.

    And, if not, people will open new halls that don’t have the rule. And families with a young engaged daughter will find somewhere else to have the Chasuna. Even at a non-traditional hall.

    Besides, Chazal suggest getting married by age 18, at the latest.

    I vote with Chazal.

    Instead of the idea in the OP, try to encourage the young men to get married earlier, instead of them waiting until 22 or 23.

    in reply to: The Historic Presidency of President Donald John Trump #2366247
    ujm
    Participant

    Yseribus: What do you have to say for yourself after having defended Joe Biden who pardoned Leonard Peltier, who murdered two FBI officers in cold blood, now that he’s been released from prison in thanks to Senile Joe? That Biden pardon was far worse than all the pardons Trump ever gave, put together.

    in reply to: YWN attack on Ami #2365989
    ujm
    Participant

    Mishpacha and Ami are both left-wing rags; though Ami is worse.

    in reply to: Unfair tax evasion? #2360275
    ujm
    Participant

    I didn’t read the follow up comments to see if the following point was made yet, but the Halacha of dina demalchusa dina does NOT apply to these cases, since these people do not live in the US. Therefore US laws aren’t halachicly binding upon them.

    in reply to: Hi I’m back 3.0 #2359917
    ujm
    Participant

    Menachem Shmei:

    I seem to recall that CS has posted on this forum (and I’ve seen similar comments by other Lubavitchers elsewhere, in case I’m misremembering regarding CS), people who were born after the Lubavitcher Rebbe was niftar, saying that had some sort of big/serious shaila and they (somehow) asked the Rebbe what to do, and the Rebbe answered him/her to do X, Y and Z.

    That’s what I’m trying to understand.

    in reply to: Hi I’m back 3.0 #2358117
    ujm
    Participant

    CS: I don’t quite understand if you have a shaila of, say, should I marry this person, or which Yeshiva should I send my son to, or how should I resolve a fight with my neighbor, or should I dedicate my life to Torah exclusively or should I also take a job, or is this particular job offer the proper hashkafa and tznius (and should I accept it), or how should I enforce tznius standards in my family, etc.

    How does the Lubavitcher Rebbe zt’l answer those questions for you when you ask him shailas similar to the above examples.

    in reply to: Dangerous scooters #2357667
    ujm
    Participant

    Maybe Yeshivos ban electric scooters.

    in reply to: Dangerous scooters #2357668
    ujm
    Participant

    Many Yeshivos ban all electric scooters.

    in reply to: The Historic Presidency of President Donald John Trump #2357449
    ujm
    Participant

    mdd: I agree that the police should have been tougher on them, in general. But in regards to the specific incident of an officer shooting that woman, I believe that was unjustified. Especially using any contemporary standard for police in the US to justifiably shoot to kill a person.

    in reply to: Hi I’m back 3.0 #2356871
    ujm
    Participant

    CS:

    How do you communicate with your Rebbe? How does the Lubavitcher Rebbe answer your personal questions and advise you on how to conduct yourself on very specific personal issues and questions you have on what to do?

    in reply to: The Historic Presidency of President Donald John Trump #2356778
    ujm
    Participant

    Yseribus: I’m referring to the vast majority of the trespassers, not the ones who specifically broke into the inner chambers. The rest of them were not stopped by the police, who at that point were letting civilians into areas that normally are restricted from access. Most of the arrests were of people who didn’t do any more than trespass, often without having known it was a restricted area. The vast vast majority of the trespassers did not commit violence.

    They should have been charged, for sure. But they were vastly overcharged and over-sentenced for political reasons against Trump.

    The Silk Road was primarily a money laundering operation. At its core, it wasn’t built for drug sales even though drug dealers latched onto it. If a drug dealer sells drugs over the phone they don’t charge the phone company. The life sentence was virtually unprecedented. You almost never hear of a life sentence for that kind of crime.

    mdd: Even if she did break into the lobby leading to the chambers, she wasn’t a lethal threat to anyone that would justify shooting her dead.

    in reply to: The Historic Presidency of President Donald John Trump #2356740
    ujm
    Participant

    Yseribus: The double murderer who killed two FBI agents that Biden set free was serving a life sentence. Biden cut him free. He would have spent the rest of his life in jail otherwise.

    That was far far worse than any pardon Trump, Obama or Clinton ever gave.

    in reply to: The Historic Presidency of President Donald John Trump #2356675
    ujm
    Participant

    mdd: The vast majority of them were simply trespassing and no more. And even that was largely after the police let anyone go past the restricted areas, so the most of the crowd didn’t know it was restricted since the police were letting them through. Trespassing is not a crime police should be shooting at people for.

    Yseribus: His sentence was widely disproportionate to what is typically given to such convictions.

    in reply to: The Historic Presidency of President Donald John Trump #2355885
    ujm
    Participant

    Officer Brian Sicknick was a strong supporter of President Trump. Who was pardoned that killed him? His death was not a homicide.

    Unlike the death of the Trump supporter lady inside the capital who was murdered in cold blood by a capital police officer who was never punished, even though the lady he killed was unarmed. It’s too bad she wasn’t black, otherwise the BLM/Antifa anarchists would have rioted and burned down Washington, like they did in Portland and other cities.

    None of Trump’s pardons were even one tenth as bad as Biden’s pardon of a cold blooded killer who murdered two police officers with his own hands.

    And calling a worldview as leftist isn’t an angry comment.

    in reply to: The Historic Presidency of President Donald John Trump #2355440
    ujm
    Participant

    Yseribus: You’d rather a president that pardons someone who murders multiple police officers, like Old Joe Biden just did this week? Or is it just that you like left-wing ideology, so you’d rather a leftist president who pardons people who kill two cops.

    in reply to: daas torah and trump #2355425
    ujm
    Participant

    Rabbi Christine McDaniels.

    in reply to: Hi I’m back 3.0 #2355342
    ujm
    Participant

    “this geula is not just for Lubavitchers by Lubavitch, but here for the average joe.”

    CS: Do you mean, by this, that the average Joe is on a lower level than Lubavitchers? (But even so, they’ll still get the geula.)

    Otherwise, why did you find it necessary to point out that non-Lubavitchers will get the geula?

    in reply to: Hi I’m back 3.0 #2355087
    ujm
    Participant

    CS:

    Do you have any response to my follow up question (or not)?

    in reply to: Hi I’m back 3.0 #2354955
    ujm
    Participant

    CS:

    As you openly admit, above, that you would consider it an illegitimate and invalid position if any other Yid held that their Rebbe or Rov or Rosh Yeshiva (whether currently among the living or not) is Moshiach, why then are you upset or disappointed or angry when others consider who you believe to be Moshiach to be an illegitimate and invalid position?

    in reply to: AI response to my question on Trump Lies #2354836
    ujm
    Participant

    You have four full years to let out your hate on Trump.

    No need to let it out all at once.

    Take it one day at a time. That’ll way you can split it up 365×4.

    in reply to: Warning you will regret not reading very word. #2354079
    ujm
    Participant

    Can I give you kvittelech?

    in reply to: Hi I’m back 3.0 #2354045
    ujm
    Participant

    Do you consider another Yid who believes that the Bobover Rebbe is Moshiach or that Rav Shach is Moshiach or that Rav Malkiel Kotler is Moshiach, to be as legitimate and valid a position as a Lubavitcher’s belief that the Lubavitch Rebbe is Moshiach?

    in reply to: Overuse of the word “neis” #2353898
    ujm
    Participant

    The Internet and its anonymous amaratzim has become the go-to place for answers regarding chinuch?

    in reply to: 7th Hour Kiddush During Permanent DST #2353427
    ujm
    Participant

    SR: People *do* avoid the hour for making a Chupa.

    in reply to: 7th Hour Kiddush During Permanent DST #2352606
    ujm
    Participant

    Based on the secular system of counting hours/time or based on the Torah system of counting hours/time?

    in reply to: Trump – Unconditional Discharge #2352367
    ujm
    Participant

    John Kennedy and Bill Clinton (especially Clinton the rapist) were much worse. Hopefully anyone here would have voted for Richard Nixon, George H. W. Bush and Bob Dole, if you were eligible to vote in those elections. And not have voted for Hillary the rapist enabler and defender.

    in reply to: Trump – Unconditional Discharge #2351394
    ujm
    Participant

    B”H the Venezuala-style political persecution, lawfare and witch hunt came crashing down on the heads of the evil Democrats who attempted to use the Justice system for their political benefit. With the American People wisely giving them the biggest potch in political history with the amazing historic greatest comeback in American political history of President Donald J. Trump, an Oheiv Yisroel Par Excellence who clearly has the Ribono Shel Olam’s support, being re-elected for the first time in over 150 years in a non-consecutive term, only the second time this happened in American history.

    This second Trump Administration will be the most powerful second presidential administration in American political history, with President Trump having had an extra four year interlude to fully prepare all the things he will do in his second administration.

    He’s essentially taken over as soon as the election was over, even before Biden was taken out by his old age political operatives, with world leaders over the last month plus already dealing with President Trump instead of with the irrelevant Biden.

    G-d Bless America!

    in reply to: If Trump becomes president, I'm moving to Canada… #2351350
    ujm
    Participant

    Daas, I need your new address in Canada.

    in reply to: If Trump becomes president, I'm moving to Canada… #2351349
    ujm
    Participant

    Mods, please move this thread to category DECAFFEINATED. Thank you

    in reply to: Does Saying “CE” and “BCE” Kasher the Christian Calendar? #2348602
    ujm
    Participant

    Neville: You shouldn’t assume just because “people use it” that it is therefore okay for us to use the yearly numbering system. (Forget about the AD/CE question altogether.)

    Many frum Yidden will *not* use the years counting from the Christian Avoda Zora. (Even if it is inaccurate by a few years, that’s what it tries to honor by counting from.)

    in reply to: Mods? Mods? #2348182
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer: The thread is probably not in the category “Decaffeinated Coffee”, so you don’t see it on the main page.

    in reply to: New Year #2348137
    ujm
    Participant

    Schnitzel: It would be better for you to disregard the so-called year count of 2024/2025 and let January 1 be more meaningful, than for you to give any credence to the yearly numbering system of 2024/2025, which was setup to count the years since the Christian Avoda Zora leader they worship, but disregard the date of January 1 — which is far far less problematic than the year count.

    in reply to: New Year #2347596
    ujm
    Participant

    B”H, it’s always a pleasure meeting a fellow Jewish Supremacist who isn’t afraid to point out the fact that we are incomparably far better than them.

    in reply to: Joseph vs squeak Nittul Nacht Chess #2347153
    ujm
    Participant

    Dr Pepper: I’m holding out for squeak to come out of his cave on the Julian nittel.

    in reply to: Zos Chanukah #2346752
    ujm
    Participant

    Soon it’ll be Zos Chanukah and we will, once again, be celebrating our own modern day Zos Chanukah miracle of the pidyon shvuyim release of Reb Shalom Mordechai.

    in reply to: 20% Done! #2344482
    ujm
    Participant

    You’re writing it yourself?

    in reply to: Sharing the burden of Torah #2342671
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #2340002
    ujm
    Participant

    Unless I’m mistaken, I think OpenDNS can easily be evaded by any user switching to 8.8.8.8 (or similar).

    in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #2339392
    ujm
    Participant

    Chaim: It was mentioned above that there doesn’t exist any effective free filter. That being the case, it would seem impossible to provide something for free if it doesn’t exist.

    in reply to: Origins of Muslim Anti-Semitism #2339391
    ujm
    Participant

    The reason for *all* anti-semitism, whether Christian, Muslim or left-wing anti-semitism is very clear. It is because we are in galus. And until we leave golus with Moshiach, it will continue.

    That being said, Christian and European anti-semitism has been far far worse and much much much more violent and spilled far far far more Jewish blood than Muslim or Arabic anti-semitism, by a very very long-shot.

    The numbers do not lie.

    Whereas Jews were constantly facing Crusades, burning of the Talmud, blood libels, black death scapegoating, pograms, Tach V’Tat, numerous expulsions (England, France, Spain, Portugal, Germany, Hungary, Austria, Switzerland, Italy, etc.), Inquisitions, Dreyfus and most recently, and notoriously, the Holocaust of 6 million, the Jews in the Arabic and Muslim lands, by comparison (and that is key) were living mostly peacefully and safely despite sporadic exceptions.

    in reply to: What if it was the other way around? #2339334
    ujm
    Participant

    L95: Rav Schach *never* said anyone who isn’t in learning should join the Israeli army. He never said anything remotely close to advocating for *anyone* to enlist.

Viewing 50 posts - 151 through 200 (of 4,819 total)