ujm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 5,264 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2485285
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Proposed Solution to the Arab-Zionist Conflict: Non-Denominational State #2485233
    ujm
    Participant

    chiefshmerel: There’s nothing complicated about the absolute undisputable fact that in Torah Judaism an appeal to a Torah True authority is the best and most powerful and winning argument.

    And, yes, there absolutely IS a “Torah True authority”, with No True Scotsman one liners not withstanding.

    The Chofetz Chaim is a Torah True authority; a Reform “rabbi” is not.
    The Chazon Ish is a Torah True authority; a Conservative “rabbi” is not.
    The Steipler is a Torah True authority; a “Rabbi” Avi Weiss and other MOs is not.
    Rav Chaim Kanievsky is a Torah True authority; “Rabbi” Benny Lau and other Zionists is not.

    in reply to: Did any of the Orthodox communities in NYC actually vote for Mamdani? #2485210
    ujm
    Participant

    No.

    in reply to: The Ba’al Shem Tov Today #2484954
    ujm
    Participant

    The fight against Chasidus was also very similar to the fight (Kovner Rov, etc.) against the Mussar Movement (Rav Yisroel Salanter, Slabodka, Novardik, etc.). The fights are long over. The Torah velt has long accepted the Mussar Movement and Chasidus. They are all part and parcel and one in unison.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2484870
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Ba’al Shem Tov Today #2484788
    ujm
    Participant

    The old fight against the Chasidim is the same idea as the old fight against Rambam and the old fight against Rav Yonosan Eybeschutz.

    The entire Torah world eventually accepted the Rambam, the Chasidim and Rav Yonosan Eybeschutz.

    in reply to: The Riddle Thread…. #2484665
    ujm
    Participant

    WB Dr. Pepper. It’s always a pleasure to see you again during your brief interludes here.

    in reply to: The Ba’al Shem Tov Today #2484656
    ujm
    Participant

    Like earlier mentioned, there are virtually no “misnagdim” today; and this has been the case for the last 100+ years. Any so-called misnaged today is simply a Litvak who holds by Litvish shittos; and he’s no more misnaged against Chasidish shittos than he’s against Serfardish or Teimanish shittos. The Litvaks daven Nusach Ashkenaz, the Chasidish daven Nusach Sefard and the Sefardish daven Nusach Spanish & Portuguese or Edot HaMizrach and Mizrachim daven Edot HaMizrach and Teimanin daven Nusach Baladi or Shami and Persians daven Nusach Paras. And all of them have unique shittos and minhagim of their own. None are against the others.

    • This reply was modified 2 days, 21 hours ago by ujm.
    • This reply was modified 2 days, 21 hours ago by ujm. Reason: duplicate wording
    in reply to: Are there any limits actually enforced by the moderators? #2484626
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: You are again a prevaricator. I brought proofs from Talmidei Chachomim and even from the Zionists themselves, where their courts and judges in Israel condemned Kastner.

    ujm
    Participant

    ZSK: idea is a non-starter from the POV of the Arabs

    Actually, a subset of Arabs are proponents.

    and purely from a Pikuach Nefesh standpoint

    The status quo is a Pikuach Nefesh sakana and has been for 77+ years.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2484317
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2484267
    ujm
    Participant

    YYA: “Ask yourself: If YOU thought Israel was no different than Ireland, then why do YOU get bent out of shape when the Israeli “leaders” do things (that they obviously shouldn’t be doing) against Yiddishkeit? Why do you expect them to be better than Goyim? אלא מאי, even you understand that Israel, despite being very deeply flawed and in need of תיקון, is “something more than Ireland”, not אתחלתא דגאולה, just “something more than Ireland”.”

    Israel is worse than Ireland. Ireland has no obligation to adhere to Yiddishkeit, since they’re Goyim. Israel are Jews so they are obligated to adhere to Yiddishkeit. There’s nothing wrong with Goyim in Ireland not adhering to Yiddishkeit; but there’s everything wrong with Jews in Israel not adhering to Yiddishkeit.

    in reply to: Letter From Bereaved Families #2484266
    ujm
    Participant

    YYA: No idea what you’re hallucinating. It has no relevance to anything I said.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2484054
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Are there any limits actually enforced by the moderators? #2484040
    ujm
    Participant

    Zionist Judge Halevi, in the Kastner Trial, condemned Kastner for “having sold his soul to the Devil”.

    in reply to: Are there any limits actually enforced by the moderators? #2484038
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: The overwhelming evidence condemning Kastner does not rely on Eichmann ym”s. It is so overwhelming that even Kastner’s own Zionist courts in Israel condemned him as a traitor to the Jewish people.

    in reply to: Proposed Solution to the Arab-Zionist Conflict: Non-Denominational State #2484036
    ujm
    Participant

    ZSK: If you were Jewish you would have known that an “appeal to authority” is the most Jewishly-correct form of argument.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2484031
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: Czarist Russia and the Weimar Republic also had millions of Yidden. If you head people referring to Czarist Russia or the Weimar Republic as the Fourth Reich, would you get as bent out of shape that someone wanted Czarist Russia or the Weimar Republic to be replaced by a better entity?

    in reply to: Letter From Bereaved Families #2484000
    ujm
    Participant

    YYA: Your point is redundant. The Yidden in Chutz La’aretz also trust in Hashem. And in only Hashem. No one else.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2483761
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2483689
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2483646
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: What is 6-7 (vav zayin)? #2483357
    ujm
    Participant

    Which circle of kids from which kinds of families are using this term?

    in reply to: Lna’ar Hazeh Hispalalti? The Dissonance of Redemption #2483349
    ujm
    Participant

    I know, right? People like Rav Moshe Feinstein, Rav Ahron Kotler, Rav Yaakov Kaminetzky, the Chofetz Chaim, Rav Chaim Ozer Grodzinski, Rav Shimon Shkop, Rav Yisrael Salanter, The Ben Ish Chai, ​The Rogatchover Gaon, the Alter of Slabodka, Rav Elchonon Wasserman, Rav Meir Shapiro, The Chasam Sofer, The Vilna Gaon, The Baal Shem Tov, The Noda B’Yehuda, ​The Pele Yoetz, The Rema, The Mechaber, The Rosh, The Rif, Rabbeinu Tam and even Rashi didn’t live in Eretz Yisroel.

    You should have been around to correct them all.

    in reply to: Letter From Bereaved Families #2483333
    ujm
    Participant

    YYA: You feel safer there, by comparison, despite October 7 and constant murders, maiming and attacks on Jews every few months to year or two for the last 77+ years?

    in reply to: Double Tap boat strike #2483332
    ujm
    Participant

    War isn’t a video game.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2483072
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Are there any limits actually enforced by the moderators? #2482960
    ujm
    Participant

    More from “To the Butcher II”, Life Magazine, December 5, 1960.

    The Setting: Argentina, 1957. Eichmann was living freely as “Ricardo Klement.” Interviewer: Willem Sassen, a Dutch journalist.

    ​”This Dr. Kastner… was a young man about my age, an ice-cold lawyer and a fanatical Zionist. He agreed to help keep the Jews from resisting in the deportation camps if I would close my eyes and let a few hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate to Palestine. It was a good bargain.”

    Eichmann said that he and Kastner shared a similar ideology: that the “masses” were less important than the “elite.”
    ​Eichmann wrote that Kastner was willing to sacrifice the old, the assimilated, and the “weak” Jews to save the “best biological material”—the young pioneers who would build Israel.

    ​The Quote: “For Kastner, as for me, it was a question of the best biological material.”

    He stated that Kastner knew exactly where the trains were going (Auschwitz). Eichmann wrote: “We trusted each other perfectly… With his great polish and reserve he (Kastner) would have made an ideal Gestapo officer himself.”

    ​Direct Quotation: “He (Kastner) agreed to help keep the Jews from resisting deportation—and even keep order in the collection camps—if I would close my eyes and let a few hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate illegally to Palestine. It was a good bargain.”

    Direct Quotation: ​”While we talked he would smoke one aromatic cigarette after another, taking them from a silver case and lighting them with a little silver lighter.”

    in reply to: Letter From Bereaved Families #2482947
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: Why do you insist upon lying? I never called Hamas anything of the sort.

    in reply to: What Exactly Do The Mods Know? #2482888
    ujm
    Participant

    ***MODS***
    PLEASE REVIEW THE LAST TWO POSTS IN THIS THREAD. TY

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2482870
    ujm
    Participant

    YYA: If you observed anyone referring to the Republic of Ireland as the Fourth Reich of Ireland, would you get as bent out of shape as you do when you hear the State of Israel being referred to as such? If not, it appears you give the Zionist State some sort of messianic categorization.

    ujm
    Participant

    ZSK: “No one with a functional brain is opposed to a non-denominational state, if it is doable.”

    Are you accusing the Religious Zionists/Daati Leumi of not having functional brains? Because, even if it were doable, they are extremely opposed to such an idea.

    So, too, are secular Zionists (like Netanyahu) who still maintain the old Zionist ideals.

    in reply to: Are there any limits actually enforced by the moderators? #2482758
    ujm
    Participant

    The memoirs of Adolf Eichmann ym”s were published in 1960 by Life Magazine. Eichmann described Kastner with a chilling “respect.” He called Kastner an “ice-cold lawyer” and a “fanatic Zionist.” This is quote from Eichmann’s memoirs:

    “I believe that Kastner would have sacrificed a thousand or a hundred thousand of his blood to achieve his political goal… He agreed to help keep the Jews from resisting in the deportation camps if I would close my eyes and let a few hundred or a few thousand young Jews emigrate to Palestine. It was a good bargain.”

    Eichmann essentially confirmed the prosecution’s theory: Kastner (who regularly drank cognac and played cards with Eichmann) traded the orderliness of the masses (“biological waste” in Eichmann’s eyes) for the “best biological material” (the pioneers/Zionists).

    in reply to: Are there any limits actually enforced by the moderators? #2482757
    ujm
    Participant

    Yaakov: In מושיען של ישראל Rabbi Shlomo Yaakov Gelbman points out that Kastner and the SS officers (Kurt Becher and Dieter Wisliceny) formed a genuine camaraderie. The book emphasizes that they drank together, played cards, and socialized while Jews were burning. The book highlights Kastner’s post-war testimony at Nuremberg on behalf of Kurt Becher and others like Hermann Krumey as the ultimate proof of his betrayal. It says that Kastner testified for Becher not because of a “promise,” but because they were “partners in crime.” It says that Kastner needed Becher to survive and remain free so that their shared secrets (and potentially shared loot) would not be exposed.

    The book mentions that Kastner and the Zionist establishment in Palestine actively blocked or sabotaged rescue attempts that did not lead to Palestine. It says the Zionists believed that saving Jews to send them to America or Romania would not help build the State of Israel. They needed “Chalutzim” (pioneers) for the state, not refugees for the Diaspora.

    The book brings evidence that the Va’ada (Kastner’s committee) had access to vast sums of money from the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (“The Joint”) and other sources. It states Kastner refused to use this money to bribe border guards or finance underground railroads into Romania (a safer option for the masses). The book points out that Kastner feared that “disorderly” mass escapes would anger Eichmann and jeopardize the “VIP Train.”

    It suggests that while the “Blood for Goods” (Trucks for Jews) offer was on the table, the Zionist leadership did not genuinely try to raise the money or fake the negotiations to stall the slaughter, because they were fixated on the smaller, surer “Zionist” victory of the train.

    מושיען של ישראל concludes that Kastner was a traitor who sacrificed the 450,000 Jews of the Hungarian provinces to save a few thousand “Zionist assets” and his own family.

    in reply to: Declare Neturei Karta to be Non-Jewish Rodfim and Enemies of the Jews #2482749
    ujm
    Participant

    That should have read Rav Ahron Schechter who together with Rav Malkiel Kotler, Rav Elya Ber Wachtfogel, the two Satmar Rebbes and other Litvish and Chasidish Gedolim together orgnaized a protest in Manhattan against the State of Israel.

    in reply to: The Ba’al Shem Tov Today #2482748
    ujm
    Participant

    YYA: You’re confusing me with Rabbi Herschel Schachter. He’s the one who wrote in defense of the convcit you’re referring to. I never wrote anything supporting him.

    ujm
    Participant

    ZSK: You are still wrong. Your lack of knowledge of European and Christian history, especially of European and Christian violence against Jews, is quite telling.

    And do not put words in my mouth. I never, not once, claimed “Sepharadic Jews lived in paradise”, where you not only misattributed to me, but you put false quotation makes thereof.

    What I did say are absolute facts.

    As for your cut and paste job, it is filled with space-fillers such as “1159 Controversy between Maimonides and the rabbi of Fez on the attitude towards forcible converts”; machlokes haposkim between Jewish decisors is nothing like the violent pograms, blood libels and the holocaust experienced by European Jewry.

    And I need not even mention that the very destruction of Jerusalem and of the Beis HaMikdash itself was wrought upon us by the Europeans.

    And, yes, asbsolutely, the Holocaust which of course is the genocide of all genocides and incomparable to everything cumulatively the Arabs ever did in 2000 years, was wrought upon the Jews by Christian Europe. Even though even absent considering the Holocause Christian Europe did far far worse and far far more than that Arabs ever cumulatively did to the Jews.

    The point isn’t which Jews suffered the most under the Holocause, even though you pointed out that would be the Ashkenazim; the point is who INFLICTED the Holocaust — and that clearly is Europe, not the Arabs and not Muslims.

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2482649
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: There’s no contradiction.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2482532
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Double Tap boat strike #2482416
    ujm
    Participant

    Taking out a small boat is harder than taking out a big boat.

    in reply to: Declare Neturei Karta to be Non-Jewish Rodfim and Enemies of the Jews #2482415
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: I’m not aware of that being the case. On what basis do you assert that?

    It appears unlikely as just ten years ago Rav Malkiel Kotler, Rav Elya Ber Wachtfogel, Rav Ahron Schter and other Litvish Gedolim together with both Satmar Rebbes and other Chasidishe Gedolim together joined at a public protest against the State of Israel in Manhattan when they were trying, again, to forcibly draft Bnei Torah.

    in reply to: Are there any limits actually enforced by the moderators? #2482407
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: Katner’s defense of Nazi mass murderers AFTER the war in the Nuremberg Trials is quite well known and a matter of the historical record. He was even condemned for it in Israeli courts (the Judge Levy trial).

    I definitely recognize you are not defending Kastner.

    But aside from the train, read read about the Vrba-Wetzler Report. Kastner knew IN ADVANCE what Eichmann and the Nazis were planning to do to the Hungarian Jews, deport them to Aushwitz and gas them to death, and he yet refused to publicly disclose that information to the Hungarian Jews so that they would otherwise refuse to voluntarily go on the trains to Aushwitz.

    in reply to: The Ba’al Shem Tov Today #2482403
    ujm
    Participant

    mdd: Get over it. In the last one hundred years there might have been only ten “Misngdim”; they virtually do not exist and haven’t for over a century.

    The Chazon Ish most absolutely was not a misnaged; he was certainly a full Litvak and not Sephardic, not Chasidic and not Teimani. Of course he had different shittos than Sephardim, Chasidim, and Teimanim. But in no way, shape or form was he ever “against” Sephardim, Chasidim, or Teimanim.

    Despite any fantasies you might have.

    in reply to: Proposed Solution to the Arab-Zionist Conflict: Non-Denominational State #2482123
    ujm
    Participant

    By the way, the idea of Israel should give up its land for peace, if that can be achieved, was advocated for by not only HaGaon HaRav Elazar Menachem Man Shach zt”l, but as well as by Chacham Ovadia Yosef zt”l and other Gedolei Yisroel.

    In fact, I can’t think of any bona fide Godol Yisroel who ever voiced disagreement with this idea.

    And the fact that Rav Shach, Chacham Ovadia, etc. advocated this, is the greatest indication that it is a viable and real option.

    Unlike some of the self-identified CR-experts here who poo-poo this as unfeasible and unrealistic. I’ll take the greats (Rav Shach, Chacham Ovadia, etc. ) over the CR-experts any day.

    in reply to: Proposed Solution to the Arab-Zionist Conflict: Non-Denominational State #2482035
    ujm
    Participant

    ZSK: I’ve studied Jewish, Muslim/Arabic and Christian/European culture longer than you. And your lack of knowledge is still very noticable. Even with your cut and paste job.

    You are still missing the point. No one ever said Jews lived beautifully under Arabic rule. It was pointed out over and over again that we are in Golus. We are in Golus whether living under Arabic rule in the Middle East or whether living under Zionist rule in the Holy Land. And while we are in Golus we have and will continue to absolutely suffer. That is by divine design. Whether it is the discriminatory taxes under Arab rule or whether it is October 7th under Zionist rule.

    But what you keep (purposely?) missing, despite it being pointed out to you again and again, is that for every entry under your cut and paste job there’s more than ten entries of persecution, suffering and destruction of Jewish life under Christian/European rule. And most of those more than ten to one ratio of Jewish persecution under Christian rule is more often ten times worse than what the Jews under Arabic rule experienced before the advent of Zionism.

    You may know a bit of Arabic history but you are sorely lacking in knowledge of non-Arabic, and especially of Christian and European, history of Jewish persecution.

    Quantifiable, quantitative and qualitative.

    in reply to: Letter From Bereaved Families #2482012
    ujm
    Participant

    Shimon: somejew obviously means he davens for the Hamas sodiers defeat and destruction.

    Hopefully you do as well.

    in reply to: Free ??? ?? ???? Sign #2482010
    ujm
    Participant

    What is a free ??? ?? ????

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2482008
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: From what I know (not being the expert) I think that;s accurate. Others simply didn’t consider him to be a godol.

    in reply to: Are there any limits actually enforced by the moderators? #2481827
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel:

    Kastner’s treachery in selling to the Nazis 500,000+ Hungarian Jewish lives in absolutely indefensible.

    And what do you have to say about the fact that Kastner was STILL defending Nazis AFTER the war was over, and there were no more even fake excuses for it?

    in reply to: The Ba’al Shem Tov Today #2481825
    ujm
    Participant

    LerntminTayrah:

    The Chazon Ish held the Imrei Emes in awe. When the Imrei Emes visited Bnei Brak, the Chazon Ish pushed through the crowds to catch a glimpse of him.

    The Chazon Ish had a famously close friendship with the Beis Yisrael (Rav Yisrael Alter). The Beis Yisrael (who was younger) would frequently visit the Chazon Ish’s home. They would speak for hours in private. The Beis Yisrael, in turn, sent his elite Chasidim to discuss Halacha with the Chazon Ish.

    The Chazon Ish famously said about the Belzer Rebbe: “He looks like a Malach of Hashem.” When the Belzer Rebbe arrived in Eretz Yisroel after the Holocaust, the Chazon Ish went out of his way to honor him, signaling to the Torah world that this man was royalty. There is a famous account where the Chazon Ish sent a student to observe the Belzer Rebbe’s Tisch. When the student reported back that the Rebbe sat in silence for hours and barely ate, the Chazon Ish remarked, “That is how a Rebbe eats.”

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 5,264 total)