ujm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 101 through 150 (of 4,288 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Children are not here to “bring Nachas to their parents” #2265821
    ujm
    Participant

    A child is obligated to follow his father’s minhagim.

    in reply to: R Soloveichik on girls education #2265797
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: If Rav Ahron had sent a shliach to borrow a book from the New York Public Library that wasn’t readily available elsewhere, and you found the index card from the NYPL with his name on it, would you take that to mean he gave his haskama to the NYPL, including its indecent and obscene materials?

    There have been many talmidei chachomim who have utilized the JTS library in Manhattan, which is even more comprehensive than the YU library; yet I can assure you than none of them intended their borrowing a book there to indicate that Conservative “Judaism” is not kefira.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2265754
    ujm
    Participant

    CS: “We are not ba’alei tshuva… We BH have a mesorah.”

    Didn’t you mention in an earlier comment that your parent is a BT?

    in reply to: R Soloveichik on girls education #2265157
    ujm
    Participant

    Rocky: Your information is incorrect. Here are some of the quotes you are asking for:

    Rav Aharon Kotler ZTV’L, in Mishnas Rabi Aharon (Vol. 3, Hesped on the Brisker Rav) states that the essence of Modern Orthodoxy is the same as the Reform and Conservative. That is, change Judaism into something that more people will be willing to accept.

    Rav Shimon Schwab wrote (Mitteilungen, Bulletin of Khal Adas Yeshurun April/May 1989): “Sometimes the Modern Orthodox halachic foolishness which is flirting with the anti-Torah establishment, may border on heresy. This is all part and parcel of the spiritual confusion of the dark ages in which we happen to live. However, in addition to the legitimate shitos we have discussed, there is yet another, more modern version in vogue called “Torah Umaada”. Apparently this is identical with Torah Im Derech Eretz, especially since both claim a belief in the priority of Torah over maada. Both seems exactly alike, but like two left gloves which cannot be worn together, they don’t fit! . . .”
    (Selected Essays pp.160-162):
    “Rav Hirsch ZT’L has inscribed two emblems on his banner. One is Torah Im Derech Eretz and the other is the so-called “Austritt”, which means severance, or total and non-recognition of any type of institutionalized heresy, “minus” or apikursus. This is also a resolution not to contribute, participate in, or support any cause which accords validity to the disbelief in Hashem or to the denial of the authenticity of Torah shebiksav or Torah shebaal peh. In other words, “Austritt” states that the Torah is our sovereign ruler, and it makes us independent of all those who deny its Divine origin…

    “To summarize, Torah im derech eretz without Austritt is considered treif l’chol hadeios! Even if you call it Torah Umaada.”

    The battle against YU by the Yeshiva world is not, nor was it, a simple issue of Halachic or Hashkafic disagreement which can be dismissed as routine if accompanied with the obligatory respect for the opposing view, as per ailu v’ailu etc. Not so. Rather, YU was viewed as a deviant, dangerous, and anti-Torah entity that doesn’t deserve the respect of a legitimate Torah position, even a mistaken one. Rav Aharon Kotler ZTL once commented about Rav Soloveitchik, “He is respnsible for the majority of Tumah in America.” Also from the same Rav Aharon, “He destroyed an entire generation of Jews.” Rav Aharon Kotler ZT’L said many times that he will not enter YU because it is bad. His son, Rav Schneur ZT’L, followed suit. Rav Elchonon Wasserman ZT’L also, when he came to America in the ’30s, was invited to speak in YU, and he refused to even walk in to the place.

    in reply to: R Soloveichik on girls education #2264973
    ujm
    Participant

    Rabbi J.B. Soloveichik was wrong on any number of issues.

    in reply to: Virtual Israeli Bank Details #2264254
    ujm
    Participant

    Dorah: As long as you’re not committing a crime, you have nothing to worry about.

    in reply to: Did Russia warn Ukraine before attacking? #2263948
    ujm
    Participant

    SR: How do you define “win”? Does Russia win and Ukraine lose if at the end of this war Russia controls more Ukrainian territory than it did in 2021? Than in 2013? Is the only definition of Russia losing if it loses every inch of Ukrainian territory it is occupying?

    Also, it is rather highly unlikely Russia will go after any country that’s part of NATO. Even if it wins in Ukraine.

    in reply to: Gedolei Torah and Municipal Elections #2263562
    ujm
    Participant

    A Yirei Shmayim will be always be a better candidate than an alternative.

    in reply to: Did Russia warn Ukraine before attacking? #2263575
    ujm
    Participant

    As to the immediate question at hand, America publicly, strongly and explicitly warned Ukraine for six months before the war that Russia WILL attack them in war. And the idiot Zelenaky kept publicly replying up to the day of the invasion “no way, Russia is just trying to scare us but will keep the peace.”

    in reply to: Did Russia warn Ukraine before attacking? #2263567
    ujm
    Participant

    Russia and Ukraine are both bad guys, from both a historical and contemporary perspective.

    Ukraine is the worse of the two, especially historically but even contemporarily.

    They’re both made for each other. Let their mutual “love” continue.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2263519
    ujm
    Participant

    All this is the greatest proof in support of the Halacha that prohibits teaching women.

    in reply to: Obama: Fraud and Destroyer of America #2263525
    ujm
    Participant

    Dorah: Would you vote for

    1. Stalin over Trump?

    2. Pol Pot over George Bush?

    3. Kim Jong-Un over Ted Cruz?

    4. Biden over Republican Abraham Lincoln?

    5. Jimmy Carter over Republican Teddy Roosevelt?

    A simple yes or no for the five above scenarios is sufficient. Your reasoning can easily be deduced from your yes or no. The only additional detail worthwhile adding for any of the above, is if you’d sit out the election and not vote even if your non-vote could potentially, effectively, let “the other guy” win.

    in reply to: Is there a Drug Problem in the “Frum World”? #2263320
    ujm
    Participant

    If America’s drug crisis was reduced to the level experienced in the frum community, America would be hailing the end of the crisis and a resounding victory in the war against drugs.

    in reply to: Who gains by flooding the US with millions of Illegals?? #2262740
    ujm
    Participant

    WB BaalHabooze!

    in reply to: Time for Frum Magazines to Change their Standards #2262288
    ujm
    Participant

    Dofi: The Rambam in Hilchos Ishus 21:10 is saying that Beis Din can administer corporal punishment to the wife, in such circumstances. NOT that the husband can.

    in reply to: Clarification to mod and DaMoshe #2262195
    ujm
    Participant

    CS: Please do not lookup it Gemora, as the Shulchan Aruch, Rambam and virtually all the Rishonim and Achronim who rule on the subject pasken that girls/women learning Torah Shebal Peh leads to Tiflus, which Rashi explains is immorality. (Something we unfortunately see came all too true, in many of the communities that in recent decades disregarded this Halacha.)

    And the psak from the Chofetz Chaim allowing a limited exception due to the fact that many females were going off the derech, specifically did not permit breaching the aforementioned Halacha in regards to teaching girls Mishnayos or Gemorah.

    in reply to: Pesach Vacation 2024 #2262194
    ujm
    Participant

    CTL: Is this Pesach a good time for us to come to the compound? Whenever works for the CTL family, I’ll try to make work for us.

    in reply to: Time for Frum Magazines to Change their Standards #2262193
    ujm
    Participant

    Don’t blame the messenger because you don’t like the message. I didn’t author the Shulchan Aruch OR the Rambam.

    in reply to: Pesach Vacation 2024 #2261926
    ujm
    Participant

    user:176 — So, then, why are they going to Orlando?

    in reply to: Biden Working on Creating a Palestinian state #2261832
    ujm
    Participant

    Jack, what was different between 1967 and 2005?

    in reply to: Pesach Vacation 2024 #2261831
    ujm
    Participant

    Speaking of shivgers… What is the difference between an in-law and an outlaw?

    .pǝʇuɐʍ ǝɹɐ sʍɐlʇno :ɹǝʍsuⱯ

    in reply to: Biden Working on Creating a Palestinian state #2261711
    ujm
    Participant

    Hadorah: Why are you against the IDF permanently occupying Gaza?

    in reply to: Chazal Fitness Programs #2261710
    ujm
    Participant

    Anything to make a buck.

    in reply to: Ethics and Entenmann’s #2261644
    ujm
    Participant

    AJ: Halacha describes who is an apikorus. There’s morning wrong and everything right with calling out an apikorus as an apikorus. The Chofetz Chaim, the gold standard of what is and isn’t Loshon Hora, clearly paskens that everyone should publicly humiliate an apikorus.

    in reply to: Pesach Vacation 2024 #2261330
    ujm
    Participant

    The latest Peach getaway advertised in Mishpacha and Ami is in Alexandria… Egypt.

    in reply to: Time for Frum Magazines to Change their Standards #2261068
    ujm
    Participant

    Hadorah: I paraphrased the Halacha in the same simple language it is written in the Shulchan Aruch and the Rambam. I didn’t embellish or add any commentary.

    in reply to: Time for Frum Magazines to Change their Standards #2261059
    ujm
    Participant

    Aseh maat: Sadly, I must admit that your “suspicion” is accurate. I’m sorry for being a man. I’ll try better next time.

    Until then I’ll try to remember that men have no right to talk about halachos regarding women. I’ll start correcting this error of thousands of years of male misogyny by going around to all the Butei Medrashim and Yeshivos that I can to confiscate all Seder Noshim in Mishnayos, Mesechtes Sotah in the Gemoras, of course Mishneh Torah Sefer Nashim and all other such Seforim authored exclusively by (yuck) men.

    in reply to: Time for Frum Magazines to Change their Standards #2261049
    ujm
    Participant

    “How is this relevant at all”

    It’s directly related. If there’s a proscription of them then being outside in public altogether too much, then kal vchomer you shouldn’t be plastering their pictures all over the place to be displayed 24/7. (Even if you disagree with this very strong correlation, you certainly can’t deny this is at least a strong argument.)

    “and what purpose does it have here other than to breed negativity for your entertainment?”

    Why would you assume it’s designed to breed negativity, when all that was said was nothing more than a simple Halacha from Shulchan Aruch and Rambam (that is also in the Gemora and throughout the Halacha seforim throughout the generations without anyone making a machlokes against it.) Unless this Halacha makes you uncomfortable.

    Halachos don’t make me uncomfortable. You do.

    in reply to: Time for Frum Magazines to Change their Standards #2261007
    ujm
    Participant

    The Rambam paskens that a husband shouldn’t allow allow his wife to leave the house more than once or twice a month. The Shulchan Aruch paskens the same, except instead of giving a specific number (once or twice) he paskens not to allow her out “too much”.
    How is this relevant at all and what purpose does it have here other than to breed negativity for your entertainment?

    in reply to: The Man Inside my Head: A Candid Conversation #2260521
    ujm
    Participant

    Paging @Sam Klein.

    in reply to: What Happened To All My Sillinesses? #2260284
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb Elezer: Whose posts are still missing?

    in reply to: What Happened To All My Sillinesses? #2260242
    ujm
    Participant

    little froggie: posting timestamp reflects vwhen a moderator approved a post (from whichever time zone in the world he may have been in) rather than when it was submitted.

    in reply to: What Happened To All My Sillinesses? #2260088
    ujm
    Participant

    It’s silly to be silly.

    Friends let friends be silly.

    in reply to: Silence from the intellectual left #2259987
    ujm
    Participant

    The left has no intellect.

    in reply to: A Working Bochur Shouldn’t be Stigmatized #2259708
    ujm
    Participant

    Kuvult: You really think girls are so vain?

    in reply to: Sending a message to an individual? #2259707
    ujm
    Participant

    There’s no private messaging here.

    in reply to: BY girl struggling #2259282
    ujm
    Participant

    Shlomo: You think that boys and girls violating the halachos regarding the interaction between males and females are mainly transpiring by college age men and women? It’s happening just as much by those in their 30s, 40s, and 50s. A 20-something Chabad “rebbetzin” on campus will not be half as adequate as an experienced Rov or Rebbetzin in their 50s and 60s.

    And this isn’t a chabad specialty either. If you’re looking for an okay-man who will assuge you that your aveiros aren’t so bad and everyone else is doing it anyways, so don’t fret over it too much, you can get someone even less judgemental by seeking out a conservative or reform rabbi.

    in reply to: Mods? Mods? #2259006
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer: Which threads/comments are missing?

    in reply to: BY girl struggling #2259000
    ujm
    Participant

    I agree this is more on the parents than on the schools. I don’t know why anyone would expect teachers to be more competent than parents in this regard. If it is a struggle for parents who live with their eight children 24 hours (minus school time), seven days a week for at least the first 18 years of their lives, then even more so for educators who each see dozens and dozens of children for only six hours a day, four or five days a week, for a handful of years.

    Also, this isn’t a school rule, this is a Hashem rule.

    And if you do go to a Rov or Rebbetzin (which is certainly a good idea), much better a much experienced one than a “young” one. (Calling Reb Shlomo; and it surely shouldn’t be limited to a Chabad one.)

    in reply to: A Working Bochur Shouldn’t be Stigmatized #2258994
    ujm
    Participant

    What on earth are you ranting about? What kumzits? What trips to Israel? What stigmatization?

    And what excuse does any bochur have to be missing minyanim?

    There’s lots and lots and lots of working baalei batim, in case you just landed from Mars and never noticed. No one is stigmatizing those that had gotten a degree or decided to become a working stiff. Last I noticed many many people respect folks in our community who are accountants, bankers, candle stick makers, open a grocery, deal in real estate, computer programmers, sales and manafacturing.

    The Agudah long has been offering COPE and PCS. There are other similar services in our communities. There has never been any shame associated with this or with working. Who else is paying Yeshiva tuitions, building Shuls, Butei Medrashim, Chesed organizations (Hatzalah, Bikur Cholims, health organizations, gemachs, etc.)?

    Many frum single girls look for working boys.

    What planet are you on?

    in reply to: Why did most Litvish stop wearing Shtreimals? #2258851
    ujm
    Participant

    DaMoshe, not to worry… many kiruv workers are toiling yomem vlayla to be mekarev them!

    in reply to: Hamas’ unsurprising return to rule gaza #2258852
    ujm
    Participant

    zionism was always a failure. And will always remain so.

    in reply to: @CTLAWYER #2258890
    ujm
    Participant

    CTL, I’d consider it a great privilege and something to very much look forward to arranging the opportunity to meet you and your Kallah. Whenever you can arrange that just give me a holler and I’ll start warming up my car.

    As you well know I’ve always enjoyed all our conversations; differences of opinions is something more worthwhile having discussions about than simply agreeing on everything. I’m sure you remember Ed Koch’s famous quote that “If you agree with me on nine out of 12 issues, vote for me. If you agree with me on 12 out of 12 issues, see a psychiatrist.” I’m certain as Yiddishe brothers that we agree with each other on something closer to 11 out of 12 issues, even though it is the 1 out of 12 that sucks up all the (enjoyable) airtime.

    in reply to: Why did most Litvish stop wearing Shtreimals? #2258746
    ujm
    Participant

    huju, Lakewood is Chasidish?

    in reply to: @CTLAWYER #2258187
    ujm
    Participant

    CTL, Wishing you and your Kallah and the gantza mishpacha a big and hearty Mazal Tov! You have all my love and best wishes, now and forever. Thank you for being who you are and doing everything you do.

    in reply to: how can turkey as a nato member do business with iran #2258186
    ujm
    Participant

    jdf007: Ukraine decided just two years ago that the spelling of Kiev henceforth must be spelled as Kyiv.

    In the 1900s Persia told the world to start calling it Iran. (They didn’t change the name of their country.)

    There are more examples as well.

    in reply to: how can turkey as a nato member do business with iran #2257851
    ujm
    Participant

    akyperma: Turkey still officially has candidate status for the European Union. Officially they are slated to “eventually” become an EU member.

    in reply to: how can turkey as a nato member do business with iran #2257850
    ujm
    Participant

    Turkey is a sovereign nation. NATO membership doesn’t surrender national sovereignty.

    in reply to: Minister Gallant Assures U.S. No Jews Will return To Gaza After #2257848
    ujm
    Participant

    smerel: That’s called “white flight”. It isn’t particular to Jews. All normal people, Jew and gentile, moved out of those neighborhoods when the criminal elements moved in.

    OTOH, the zionist activities made the Arab population militantly and violently antisemitic.

    in reply to: Minister Gallant Assures U.S. No Jews Will return To Gaza After #2257570
    ujm
    Participant

    This isn’t news. The Zionist insured that Gaza, as well as various other parts of Eretz Yisroel, should be Judenrein. The Zionists followed in the footsteps of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party.

Viewing 50 posts - 101 through 150 (of 4,288 total)