ujm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 101 through 150 (of 5,258 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2473990
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2473987
    ujm
    Participant

    Yaakov: Are you saying that until it can be proven that eating cheesecake is directly responsible for Yidden actually getting killed ר״ל it’s OK to eat cheesecake? What about ספק נפשות?

    What they say in public causes the same safek nefoshos risks as you eating cheesecake.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2473989
    ujm
    Participant

    YYA: Yes; but putting simple quotation marks around your quotes is quick and easy (unlike using bold or italics).

    _______________________________________

    To use bold first put the character ” < ” then put the word “strong” then put the character ” > ” then put the word or words or sentence that you wish to appear bold.

    After the word/words/sentence that you want bolded put the character ” < ” then put “/strong” then put the character ” > ”

    Do not use any spaces (and do not use any of the quotation marks I used above when explaining) between the character before or after the word strong.

    To use italics do exactly the same as above but instead of “strong” use “em” (and “/em”)

    in reply to: Million Man March #2473763
    ujm
    Participant

    YYA:

    Please put quotation marks around any quote you repost from another poster.

    Otherwise readers will mistakenly attribute to you when you are quoting other people (even though you intend to disagree with them).

    in reply to: Tiferes Shlomo and the modern State of Israel #2473409
    ujm
    Participant

    And, again, for the umpteenth time both Yaakov and Yankel attribute to me what they confused from hearing by others even though I said nothing. In fact, other than one minor comment pointing out the context of someone’s comment, I hadn’t even posted in this thread.

    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2473410
    ujm
    Participant

    Yaakov: Even if you were correct (you aren’t — Congressman Nadler represented Williamsburg/Boro Park and had the biggest Satmar constituency in the US), so what? That has nothing to do with the context of the point being made. Are you following the conversation?

    Yankel said NK going to Palestinian rallies effectively causes Jews to be killed. When challenged on that absurd idea he defended himself by (erroneously) claiming that the Number Four top American official, Chuck Schumer, said on the Senate floor that Neteurei Karta also opposes arms to Israel so it is therefore justified for America to stop sending some arms to Israel.

    And I simply responded that Chuck Schumer said nothing at all about that, it was Jerry Nadler that Yankel was confusing Schumer with, and even Nadler did NOT say NK but rather said Satmar. And, even then, Nadler did NOT say it in support of stopping arms to Israel but rather simply making the accurate point that anti-Zionism is not necessarily anti-Semitism (which no one ever accuses Satmar of.)

    Does Yankel now believe that Satmar is killing Jews in Israel?

    in reply to: Chazon Ish [ZTL ZYA] and Military Draft Exemptions #2472630
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: Those are individual strategies, with purposes, that do not indicate whatsoever that HaGaon HaRav Menachem Man Shach in any way believed or supported the idea that Chareidi bochorim who are NOT learning should enlist.

    The reason disallowing non-learners from regiatering as a learner, is totally obvious: not to risk having the secular government take it away altogether, even from learners, by claiming it is being abused.

    And the license issue is also quite obvious; there legally they could be exempted at no cost to anyone else. But the Gedolim were so strong against being licensed that they threatened bochorim who did contemplate getting licensed against the directives of Gedolei Yisroel, something much much worse — being forced into the IDF.

    That was successful in stopping those thinking of it from getting licensed; no one wanted to go to the army.

    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2472555
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: Looking back at the events you keep erroneously citing, you’ve been making several additional factual errors:

    1. Schumer never defended arms embargoes against Israel and, in fact, never even supported arms embargoes against Israel.

    2. Schumer never mentioned Jewish anti-Zionists in his speeches.

    3. Schumer has relatively little influence on establishing arms embargies. And, as stated, didn’t use that little influence, in any case.

    4. You are confusing Schumer with Jerrold Nadler, who is one out of four hundred and thirty five members of the House. Nadler did cite Jewish anti-Zionists on the House floor, but not in regards to arms embargoes; he did so in simply stating that anti-Zionism is NOT necessarily anti-Semitism (which is obviously 100% correct; especially Jewish anti-Zionism, which is what he was explicitly referring to.)

    5. Even Nadler’s speech referenced only Satmar; NOT Neteurei Karta.

    Your very poor attempt to “prove”, with grossly exaggerated and factually false hyperbole, that NK going to Palestinian demonstrations is somehow a pekuach nefesh danger, has fallen flat on its face.

    This is all even if you firmly and strongly disagree and oppose NK. Nevertheless, to claim what they do is a pekuach nefesh danger is demonstrably a canard. Of course, it is the position of the NK that what they do is pekuach nefesh in saving Jewish lives, by demonstrating to the world that Judaism isn’t Zionism, and Judaism is opposed to Zionism, and that the crimes committed by the Zionists in Israel isn’t from Judaism, as Jews oppose it; in the hope that if they make this loud and clear enough they might prevent some gentiles who might seek to avenge the crimes of the Zionists from doing so against innocent Jews.

    Whether that strategy is ever successful (if it is even succesful in preventing one attack against one innocent Jew, it is a success), you can debate.

    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2472409
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: I’m beginning to see you may mean well (in making factually incorrect statements) but you are politically uneducated. Schumer played absolutely no role in depriving Israel from American arms. This is an unassailable fact.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2472408
    ujm
    Participant

    No one is seeking ZSK’s “admission”, as coming from someone with demonstrable krum worldviews, it wouldn’t be worth the paper (or pixels) it is written on.

    ZSK even got the very basic facts wrong. The Sephardic rabbis leadership at JTS was quite brief. It completely ended in 1902 when Solomon Schechter, another non-Orthodox apikorus, took the leadership at JTS. Yes, that was 1902; and no one ever considered JTS to be Orthodox any time thereafter. That was long long before apikorus Lieberman joined that openly treif institution.

    Faur was a marginal figure in JTS (who quit it in disgust); he and Dimitrovsky (who was not Orthodox) were simply professors there and neither were part of the leadership.

    Reform was dominant already in the 19th and early 20th century. By time the Conservatives became larger than them (much later; and which only lasted a relatively brief period), both movements were fully apikorsum.

    The European Shtetl may have been materially a difficult place to live, but spiritually it was far far above and beyond any alternative. Better spirituality than materialism. And the churban in Europe was a physicaly one; spiritually it is the direct and unambiguous cause for the renaissance of Torah Judaism in America with the arrival of the European Torah sages to the shores in America.

    in reply to: Chazon Ish [ZTL ZYA] and Military Draft Exemptions #2472150
    ujm
    Participant

    This is a complete lie, falsehood, canard and fiction. The Chazon Ish and Rav Elazar Menachem Man Shach never ever supported Chareidi men — even though who are NOT learning Torah — from routinely enlisting in the IDF.

    The Chazon Ish objection to IDF service was based the army being a secularizing “melting pot” that is an environment as a place of shmad and spiritual destruction, with mandatory exposure to secular culture, non-observance and Shabbos desecration.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2472049
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2472050
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2472051
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: Again with the grossly exaggerated hyperbole. Schumer didn’t stop arms going to Israel; regardless of whatever “speech” he’s on the record making in the Senate. In fact, Schumer had no control over what arms did or didn’t get sent to Israel.

    NP: Neteurei Karta today still has their Shuls in Meah Shearim, Batei Ungarin, Bnei Brak, etc still davening Nusach Ashkenaz, as has been their custom since the Perushim. Yes, they most certainly have everything to do coming from the Talmidei HaGRA.

    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2471428
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: More grossly exaggerated hyperbole. Schumer didn’t stop arms going to Israel because of NK. (In fact, he didn’t stop it at all, for any reason.)

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2471395
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2471393
    ujm
    Participant

    Yaakov: Where did I ever mention anything about the Three Oaths? You’re mixing up your protagonists, in your old age. 😁 I never said NK and Satmar have identical positions. Everyone knows the Neteurei Karta are Litvaks and from the Talmidei HaGRA.

    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2470905
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: “do you know that official weapons embargoes against the medina… quote the anti zionist fools/ba’alei ga’ava who are on public record against the medina…”

    This, again, is grossly exaggerated hyperbole. I’ll repeat the point again; all the NK’s actions, demonstrations, media exposure and everything else combined from the beginning of the NK until today, at this very moment, never ever resulted in any official weapons embargoes against the State of Israel. (And no weapons embargoes caused the State to be short of necessary weaponry.)

    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2470834
    ujm
    Participant

    Rav Meir Porush said this week:

    “I told them something I’ve heard many times from my late father-in-law, Rav Nachum Halpern. When HaRav Amram Blau was imprisoned in 1953 for protesting Chillul Shabbos, the Chazon Ish came to visit him. When he entered the cell, Rav was deeply moved, and the Chazon Ish said to him, ‘You’re here because you protested Chillul Shabbos. In truth, Shabbos itself is now in prison.”

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2470832
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2470681
    ujm
    Participant

    All the so-called “Hareidi units” aren’t Hareidi. They are 90+% dati leumi/religious Zionists; and a small minority of mostly OTD Hareidim.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2470676
    ujm
    Participant

    I’m not comparing the two, but rather making a broader point. Saul Lieberman was also a so-called “talmid chochom”. Yet Mr. Lieberman was an apikorus. Being very book smart (in Jewish holy books) doesn’t mean much in some cases.

    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2470334
    ujm
    Participant

    Yankel: Discard your grossly hyperbolic exaggerations. No Jew ever died because some NK guys went to a Palestinian demonstration. There’s absolutely nothing pekuach nefesh dangers that they do.

    I know you hate them. And you can disagree with them; but that doesn’t give you license for falsehoods.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2470294
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2470293
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2470292
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2470291
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2470246
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2470218
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2469852
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Askonim, What’s your Plan Now #2469835
    ujm
    Participant

    WB 147! Your immoral words of pure wisdom have been absent from these hallowed pages for nearly two years.

    in reply to: 80s song relevant to today #2469365
    ujm
    Participant

    Yes, I was correct:

    in reply to: 80s song relevant to today #2469363
    ujm
    Participant

    Country Yossi?

    in reply to: Time to make the popcorn #2469362
    ujm
    Participant

    Some of the Gedolim agree to paying lip service to “quotas” which are tacitly understood to be filled mainly by shababniks, OTD, Chardakim, etc. who “are anyway being mechalel Shabbos and doing issurei kares”… (It is known in the Chareidi world who said that.) Others disagree even with that. There is a difference between “not learning” and “mechalel Shabbos” (“Issurei kares” means having a GF if you didn’t understand.)

    It’s hardly a secret that was said by HaGaon HaRav Ahron Leib Shteinman. It was widely and publicly reported at the time:

    Recently Released Letter By Maran HaRav SHteinman To Hagon HaRav Don Segal Regarding Nachal Charedi

    in reply to: New book – “HaChareidim V’Haaretz” #2469350
    ujm
    Participant

    YYA: Every secular, Reform and Conservative Jew, virtually anywhere in the world, also, had frum great grandparents, not too long ago.

    in reply to: Where is the Protection of Hashem Now? #2469349
    ujm
    Participant

    Evalimoshavlo: Israel is part of Golus. You can’t leave Golus before Moshiach comes.

    in reply to: Where is the Protection of Hashem Now? #2469348
    ujm
    Participant

    anonymous Goy: Do you eat chazer?

    in reply to: Where is the Protection of Hashem Now? #2468582
    ujm
    Participant

    Chizuk? Don’t worry; you’re in the Five Towns. When Mamdani rounds up the Jews to put them into concentration camps, he won’t be able to reach you.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2468454
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2468092
    ujm
    Participant

    mdd, like YYA pointed out to you — Satmar (and Brisk, Toldos Ahron, the Eidah HaChareidus and a number of others) never accepted Israeli government funding, ever, to begin with. Since 1948. And they are all still around. And thriving.

    If the Yeshiva velt, the Litvaks, other Chasidim, etc need to give up every penny of Israeli government funding to keep the government out of our business and keep us our of their treife army, we’ll all give up every penny from their government and still stay far far away from the tuma army.

    in reply to: Write in votes #2468091
    ujm
    Participant

    I do a write in vote for any office that there’s no Republican or Conservative candidate. (With a tiny number of exceptions, sometimes.)

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2467921
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2467835
    ujm
    Participant

    mdd1: I would like to hear your opinion on the question of should shvach bochorim be completely and entirely exempt from army service, given the fact of how so so many shvach bochorim enlist in the IDF while observant but by time they’re discharged from service they’re frei.

    Yes or no, Reb mdd?

    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2467826
    ujm
    Participant

    Yaakov: I’m very aware of the history. And the NK was quite “radical” (in the sense how hamon hoam defines radical in these regards) under the leadership of Rav Amrom. It didn’t suddently flip within five years after Rav Amrom withdrew from the leadership. There are quite the stories of Rav Amrom himself.

    Btw, if you search the UN website you can find documents from the NK petitioning the UN in the 1950s to take away Israeli sovereignty and place the Holy Land under international control and UN protectorate.

    in reply to: Time to make the popcorn #2467755
    ujm
    Participant

    Democracy is not a Jewish concept. Judaism supports a monarchy that’s a Jewish theocracy.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2467656
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2467542
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2467349
    ujm
    Participant

    The statistics I’ve seen was around the 50% mark as the figure of RZ/DL enlistees in the IDF that come out frei.

    in reply to: Capitalism, Socialism, and the New York Election #2467069
    ujm
    Participant

    You should submit this as your thesis for your Master’s.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2467068
    ujm
    Participant

    YYA: Actually it very much makes sense.

    Firstly, though, the Holy Roman Empire (962-1806) and the Deutsches Reich (1871–1918) and even the Weimar Republic (1919–1933) all used the name Reich as part of their official names of the country before the Nazis Third Reich.

    It makes sense here given the facts that the Zionists collaborated with the Nazis during the Holocaust period. And given the facts that Zionists today persecute Torah Jewry.

    I’m not sure why you brought up Oestreich; that is a reference to the name of Austria.

Viewing 50 posts - 101 through 150 (of 5,258 total)