ujm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,951 through 2,000 (of 5,001 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Can we have an adult conversation about education? #2124278
    ujm
    Participant

    “A secular education is necessary in this American golus”

    It is no more necessary than a Polish and Russian education was necessary for Yidden in Poland or Russia. We did without learning Polish history or Russian history and we did without science.

    in reply to: Can we have an adult conversation about education? #2124125
    ujm
    Participant

    “I guarantee that if a hispanic “latinx” community wanted to keep their kids speaking spanish, and have a spanish speaking school, they would not be treated this way. They would be appreciated as diverse, etc.. no matter what the results of their system would be.

    But if Jews speak yiddish and hebrew, and run businesses, and don’t father children and run away….that’s not ok.”

    NYC public school tech math, science and a host of other subjects in Spanish for members of the Hispanic community.

    Only the Big Bad Jews are not allowed to teach all secular subjects in a non-English language — such as in Yiddish.

    in reply to: Can we have an adult conversation about education? #2124123
    ujm
    Participant

    “For everyone proclaiming that Jewish education is “just fine”, what objective studies or reports can you present to support your position?”

    2,000+ years of survival in exile despite severe persecution.

    Where is the Roman Empire, the Persian Empire, the Greek Empire and countless other empires?

    in reply to: Help with my literacy please #2124108
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer, is there anything available from a man?

    in reply to: Shidduchem in 2022 #2124109
    ujm
    Participant

    southerner: Can a nice country boy or hillbilly bochor who is a mentsch relatively easily find a nice shidduch in one of those out of town communities that you mentioned?

    in reply to: Can we have an adult conversation about education? #2124112
    ujm
    Participant

    ubiq: “However for those few who want to be frei are stuck.”

    That’s absolutely the way it should be. And must remain.

    in reply to: No torah no jewish state #2124104
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: Which Acharonim allowed you to accept or use the non-Jewish cash sent to you by Uncle Sam during the Covid pandemic?

    in reply to: Heter meah rabbanim #2124093
    ujm
    Participant

    It’s important to add that (by Ashkenazim) if the husband wants to divorce but the wife wants to continue the marriage, barring specific extenuating circumstances where he might be entitled to force her (in Beis Din) to accept a Get, the general rule established by Cherem Rabbeinu Gershom is that she’s within her rights to veto his request to divorce and she can legitimately force him to remain married to her.

    in reply to: Heter meah rabbanim #2124022
    ujm
    Participant

    Dr. Pepper,

    The Halacha regarding Heter Meah Rabbonim says it needs at least one rabbi from three countries. Most opinions say three different US States suffices for this purpose. If you want to be more careful you can get one rabbi from each Canada and Israel in addition to 98 Kollel yungerleit in Lakewood.

    Yes, air travel in the past made it more difficult to procure. I don’t suppose anyone will insist sending a horse and buggy to Toronto (or to New York, if another State suffices) for the out of state/country signatures. Many things became “easier” in Yiddishkeit due to advanced technologies.

    A HMR is not limited to the type of cases (and related thereof) that you mentioned. It is far more expansive to include any case where the husband has a reasonable reason to desire divorce whereas the wife is unreasonable in refusing.

    As far as acceptable, the only person that will need to find the issued HMR acceptable is the one rabbi that will officiate for the husband’s future marriage. Anyone else’s opinion has no bearing. (Halachicly you don’t even need a rabbi to perform a marriage.)

    in reply to: Can we have an adult conversation about education? #2123829
    ujm
    Participant

    The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that parents have the right to stop all education after eighth grade.

    in reply to: Heter meah rabbanim #2123759
    ujm
    Participant

    Any 100 kollel yungerleit with smicha can sign a Heter Meah Rabbonim. It shouldn’t be hard to put it together, if one wants to.

    Ashkenazic husband’s cannot give a Get against the wife’s will since Cherem Rabbeinu Gershom prohibits them from doing so. Any non -Ashkenazic husband can give his wife a Get against her will. Non-Ashkenazim can also be married to multiple wives.

    in reply to: Can we have an adult conversation about education? #2123756
    ujm
    Participant

    OP/Besalel:

    1. You must completely separate the discussion of education pertaining to Limudei Kodesh from secular studies. Some/many parents, may desire — fully within their rights — to forgoe any secular education and focus entirely on Limudei Kodesh and on being a Ben Torah, Yid and mentsch with stellar middos.

    This is not only their natural right, but it is a highly commendable choice. Even if you disagree with the parents.

    2. To answer your OP, Torah education has not declined with time over the last 75 years. Au contraire. It has markedly improved.

    3. Those spending 50% of their income on their children’s education are clearly and absolutely focusing on their second education. To the detriment of their Torah education, I might add, as the secular is then occupying a significant amount of the child’s limited time per day.

    No one needs to spend remotely nearly 50% of their income of their children’s Torah education.

    4. Not every of what you call “kosher fields” is as kosher as you may think. Some are less kosher than others, even if not outright forbidden. There is very good reason to educate one’s children to the exclusion of gaining a taste or ability to choose a less kosher line of work environment over a more kosher/Jewish field.

    in reply to: Bar Mitzva Party #2123672
    ujm
    Participant

    Amil, anyone who would even consider inviting Jackson could not be properly described as frum.

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2123680
    ujm
    Participant

    The Queen is simply referred to as “Queen Camilla”. Although her full legal title is Camilla, Queen consort of the United Kingdom, she’s formally referred to as Queen Camilla, much as Elizabeth II’s mother, Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother, was simply known as Queen Elizabeth when her husband King George was alive.

    in reply to: Shidduchem in 2022 #2123520
    ujm
    Participant

    Ebonics?

    in reply to: Paskez Chew chews and other extinct nosh photos #2123503
    ujm
    Participant

    If Paskesz disconnected the confection, it is a safe bet that it wasn’t commercially worthwhile maintaining.

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2123473
    ujm
    Participant

    How is Her Majesty, Queen Camilla doing, after a few days on the throne?

    in reply to: Paskez Chew chews and other extinct nosh photos #2123463
    ujm
    Participant

    Mr. Paskesz doesn’t live in an Ivory Tower. You can easily find his contact and give him a quick friendly call.

    in reply to: Bar Mitzva Party #2123464
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer, Rav Moshe is very against making a Bas Mitzvah party. He has three teshuvos in the Igros Moshe against it. He calls it a Reform innovation.

    in reply to: Can we please fix the Coffee Room? #2123465
    ujm
    Participant

    Past “upgrades” of the Coffee Room (bbPress) have gone very badly and ruined/mangled/destroyed many (perhaps most) old threads.

    in reply to: Is it the משגיח’s fault? #2123364
    ujm
    Participant

    ymr: You’re building in too many assumptions. A goy might risk it even if it wasn’t “worth the risk” on an actuary table.

    in reply to: The coffee room is ussor and I’m trying to make sure people chap #2123329
    ujm
    Participant

    CS: Have you ever met a troll that you agreed with his post? Or do you consider anyone you disagree with to be a troll?

    in reply to: Non Jewish Funerals #2123031
    ujm
    Participant

    chiefshmerel: Avoda Zora is worse that eating chazir.

    If someone claimed an opinion that it’s okay to eat chazir to supposedly avoid chilul Hashem, he’d rightfully be called a reformer. And, yes, the Reform had what you’d refer to as a “greater talmid chacham than anyone on this site.”

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2123025
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer: the mother threw herself under the bus. And she got herself run over.

    Goldilocks: Absolutely.

    in reply to: Non Jewish Funerals #2123020
    ujm
    Participant

    chiefshmerel: If the King offers you chazir, will you eat it to “avoid chilul Hashem”?

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2122976
    ujm
    Participant

    Diana and James Hewitt were guilty of the Treason Act 1351, starting in 1986, a mere five years or less into her marriage. But were subject to (and frankly should have been) executed under the law for having committed treason.

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2122970
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer, Diana was much worse.

    in reply to: Non Jewish Funerals #2122921
    ujm
    Participant

    It is prohibited to attend a church service. It is even prohibited to simply enter a church sanctuary.

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2122918
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer, Diana’s commiting adultery is inexcusable. Under British law at the time, she was liable to be executed, as the law provided the death penalty if the wife of the heir to the throne committed adultery.

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2122742
    ujm
    Participant

    “Divorce and separation,” Queen Elizabeth said, “are responsible for some of the darkest evils in our society today.”

    And to answer the inevitable questions regarding her children’s divorces, the Queen’s self-proclaimed description of them was “annus horribilis”.

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2122696
    ujm
    Participant

    Amil: Queen Camilla’s formal title and style today is Her Majesty The Queen Consort. From 2005 until this morning it formally was “Her Royal Highness”.

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2122694
    ujm
    Participant

    By the way, Camilla now being the Queen of England and all her Commonwealths is sweet payback for the adulteress Diana. (Even though Camilla herself is guilty of the same.)

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2122687
    ujm
    Participant

    Amil: The London Beis Din never permitted it, despite Mirvis’ church attendance. Indeed, prior to Sacks no Chief Rabbi attended church services.

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2122682
    ujm
    Participant

    “Why is the wife of a King called Queen, but the husband of a Queen is a prince?”

    Participant: Because the title King is a higher title than Queen. So if the Queen is the sovereign, her husband cannot have a higher title than herself, namely King. But if the King is the sovereign, his wife may have the lower title of Queen.

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2122680
    ujm
    Participant

    Amil: Incorrect. Firstly, Queen Elizabeth just seven months ago expressed her “sincere desire” that Camilla be known, recognized and titled as the Queen Consort once Charles ascends. Secondly, that decision by Elizabeth replaced the *informal* announcement at the time of Charles’ marriage that it was their “intention” that Camilla be known as Duchess after his ascension.

    But even had that earlier intention not been changed by Elizabeth this year, Camilla would still under British law have been the Queen Consort and would have formally had that title, even had she chosen to refer to herself as Duchess.

    All hail for Her Majesty The Queen Consort Camilla!

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2122660
    ujm
    Participant

    “Can the Chief Rabbi attend the service at Westminister Abby?”

    Absolutely not.

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2122562
    ujm
    Participant

    Long live the King!

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2122492
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer, send a memo to Charles to abdicate, Edward VIII style.

    in reply to: King Charles and Queen Camilla #2122414
    ujm
    Participant

    Elizabeth’s health is deteriorating.

    in reply to: Education and Torah #2121987
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Education and Torah #2121828
    ujm
    Participant

    Marxist, if you don’t like a Halacha you think you can simply reinterpret a word to change its meaning? Or, even better yet, claim that a common word with a known meaning is some kind of mysterious unknown meaning that, therefore, needs to be set aside and ignored?

    in reply to: Solution to the Shidduch Crisis #2121602
    ujm
    Participant

    moishek: G-d forbid that dating is essentially either flirting or engaging in with no intention of marrying. Both are indeed forbidden.

    in reply to: Solution to the Shidduch Crisis #2121346
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer, yes, it’s true. I met that bochor (now married to an African wife.)

    in reply to: Bird Feeders #2121327
    ujm
    Participant

    Is the bird feeding neighbor a woman?

    in reply to: Bird Feeders #2121132
    ujm
    Participant

    How can you possibly get rid of something another person is doing that is permitted?

    in reply to: “Frum” female singers on YouTube #2121006
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ, the Sephardic, and Jewish in general, presence in the United States was de minimis prior to the mass arrival of German Jewish immigrants in the mid 19th century.

    in reply to: “Frum” female singers on YouTube #2120852
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ, a Halachic source please, to allegedly differentiate between Erva A and Erva B. This is a Halachic issue.

    in reply to: “Frum” female singers on YouTube #2120842
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ, that may be your boich svara, but erva is erva. Unless you provide a source that there’s a difference between voice erva and any other erva, there’s no basis to differentiate between a recorded voice erva with a recorded image erva.

    in reply to: “Frum” female singers on YouTube #2120732
    ujm
    Participant

    Are we consistent here? If you forbid Kol Isha on a recording or radio, then would you allow shofar blowing over the same media?

    Are we consistent here? If you permit Kol Isha on a recording, then would you prohibit recorded images (not actual live viewing) of an undressed isha?

    in reply to: The infamous club at YU – gone? #2120625
    ujm
    Participant

    ubiq: No one is in any such “club”. Everyone knows it is very wrong, are embarrassed about any such desire, fight that desire and would never create or join any public club having anything related to such desires.

    On the other hand YU, is openly boasting of creating support groups, giving sensitivity training and presenting public events so that their students, rebbeim and faculty better understand the toeiva experience.

Viewing 50 posts - 1,951 through 2,000 (of 5,001 total)