Home › Forums › In The News › Why is the White House Still Attacking Fox News?
- This topic has 10 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by A600KiloBear.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 19, 2009 2:59 pm at 2:59 pm #590614Y.W. EditorKeymaster
The White House escalated its offensive against Fox News on Sunday by urging other news organizations to stop “following Fox” and instead join the administration’s attempt to marginalize the channel.
Your thoughts?
October 19, 2009 3:25 pm at 3:25 pm #662891Just SmileParticipantThis White House administration is a disgrace to the White House. They are acting like a bunch of immature babies. I don’t think any Republican administration went on a all out war against the liberal biased media of CNN and the likes. This isn’t Chicago politics anymore where we just bad mouth people and start to cry when people are arguing with you.
My five words to Obama and the rest of his immature baby administration –
Grow up or shut up.
October 19, 2009 3:31 pm at 3:31 pm #662892NY MomMemberAs the article says, it is already backfiring on them. Good! Let them keep attacking Fox, so even more people will tune in and hear the truth about this administration.
October 19, 2009 3:35 pm at 3:35 pm #662893mybatMemberEver since this president was elected he wanted change, since he is African American no one can talk against him and his policies without being accused of racism.
There is also a very big socialist movement going on in the world, look at Honduras, Venezuela. Brazil and Mexico were very close to having socialist presidents, Europe and China. If you were to study movements around the world you would see that its heading towards a socialist movement,
October 19, 2009 3:37 pm at 3:37 pm #662894mybatMemberAs NYmom says there’s no bad publicity,the more they attack fox news the more people will tune in.
October 19, 2009 4:38 pm at 4:38 pm #662895mazcaMemberWhat happened to freedom of speach?
October 19, 2009 5:11 pm at 5:11 pm #662896haifagirlParticipantmazca: Freedom of speech is part of one of the 10 amendments known as the Bill of Rights. So far, only 1 of those amendments has not been breached. To the best of my knowledge, the government is not quartering soldiers in private homes. The rest of the Bill of Rights was thrown out the window long ago.
October 19, 2009 5:25 pm at 5:25 pm #662897israelbochurMemberhaifagirl – unless you have a democrat with republican parents, but the democrat has heeded the community organizer in chiefs call to community service, in which case they are being quartered in private homes
wait … haifagirl is of the opposite gender … can i reply?
October 19, 2009 5:36 pm at 5:36 pm #662898haifagirlParticipantDon’t worry. I’m really an 83-year-old man.
And I’ll concede your point, but that would leave us with no rights that the government hasn’t tried to squelch.
October 19, 2009 5:37 pm at 5:37 pm #662899obamanazMemberDunn has been facing some criticism since she led a White House campaign last week against Fox News, slamming the top-rated network as an “arm of the Republican Party” and “opinion journalism masquerading as news.”
Fox hit back this past Friday, releasing a video of Dunn speaking to high school students last June in which she lists her two “favorite political philosophers,” including Communist Chinese leader Mao Tse-tung, whose draconian policies are blamed for the deaths of tens of millions of people.
October 19, 2009 8:41 pm at 8:41 pm #662900A600KiloBearParticipantBS”D
I lived in Russia under Putin. This is reminiscent of what Putin did to media outlets which did not agree with him. The difference is that Putin fixed the Russian economy (with much help from commodities prices), introduced a flat tax, tamed the oligarchs etc etc. In fact if Putin were not supplying arms to Iran and Venezuela and manipulating the Jewish community I would still support him as I did when I lived there, having left for unrelated reasons before the arms deals and other excesses took place.
Obama is more reminiscent of Chavez, who is sinking Venezuela’s economy with his populist policy while manipulating the media.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.