?? Rand0m3x ?

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,201 through 1,250 (of 2,752 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Breakfast Faux Pas ? #1241192
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    I’m interested.

    in reply to: Just testing the various “allowed markup”s ???? #1239841
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    <abbr title=”HyperText Markup Language”>HTML</abbr>

    in reply to: Just testing the various “allowed markup”s ???? #1239840
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant
      For emphasis?
    in reply to: Smiley faces #1239839
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    (My earlier comment is an attempt to post images showing
    the way the OP looks in Firefox vs. Internet Explorer.)

    in reply to: Smiley faces #1239816
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    in reply to: Just testing the various “allowed markup”s ???? #1239835
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    We can do color (I haven’t tried to figure out how yet), but that’s an image.

    in reply to: Smiley faces #1239829
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    I hadn’t. The stuff in the green box (it’s blue for me)
    are effects that you can use, just like <em>this</em> makes this.

    in reply to: Split: Suggestions to Improve the New YWN Coffee Room #1239815
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Fix the typo in the New Topic page name (Home › Coffeeroom › New Cofeeroom Topic).

    in reply to: Moved: Reply To: Confession #1239803
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Maybe like this? (Let’s see what happens.)

    “: )”

    in reply to: You might be spending too much time in the CR if… #1239800
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant
    in reply to: Split: Suggestions to Improve the New YWN Coffee Room #1239802
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    No one reads YWN to obtain general news, including Zionist news.
    All that is readily available elsewhere.

    Just because people can read it somewhere else, it doesn’t mean that
    they actually do. Perhaps they wish to avoid the other websites.

    in reply to: Martial law Modding #1238793
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Regarding those notes, the answer is that you can turn it off (each time you edit).

    in reply to: Question about the new format #1238791
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    I wonder what the “last updated” time refers to. I’m pretty sure it doesn’t
    mean the last time at which a poster submitted a post to the thread.

    in reply to: Martial law Modding #1238789
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    There may be a shorter editing window now.

    in reply to: Martial law Modding #1238779
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    (I have now seen claims that we can’t edit at all anymore. I hope that’s incorrect…)

    EDIT: It’s incorrect.

    (Another edit: This post was supposedly touched
    by Mod-29, but I think I edited over the change.)

    in reply to: Martial law Modding #1238777
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    It shows up >here< as well, but I’d like to understand why it doesn’t show up on all edited posts.

    (The new system which doesn’t allow me to simply add this to my previous post while it’s
    waiting for moderation is annoying, but it does let you know whether your post is going
    to show up immediately following the post you’re replying to or not.)

    in reply to: Martial law Modding #1238776
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant


    This topic was modified 5 hours, 27 minutes ago by YW Moderator-29.
    This topic was modified 5 hours, 27 minutes ago by YW Moderator-29.
    This topic was modified 5 hours, 19 minutes ago by YW Moderator-29.

    http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/martial-law-modding/#post-1238316

    Why does this appear here, but not on other threads/posts?

    By the way, it will also say that if it is opened, even if it is not modified or edited

    in reply to: Moved: Reply To: Confession #1238775
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Thank you. : ) This new trick of yours is cute, too.

    (How does this show up on your screens, folks?
    🙂
    On mine, it’s a little box with the text “OIF 642” in it.
    I may have to put spaces in all future smileys.)

    in reply to: Credit Card “Shtick/Fraud” – is it stealing? #1237934
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    At 3:36 PM, “this topic contains 29 replies” and “has 2 voices.”
    Can someone translate, please?

    in reply to: Just testing the various “allowed markup”s ???? #1237846
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    <a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">

    Here’s your box to play with the new toys in, folks.
    (Oh, and feel free to voice your opinions on…
    whatever it is this website has become.)

    in reply to: Just testing the various “allowed markup”s ???? #1237847
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Hmmm. Can’t edit posts pre-approval anymore, it seems.

    in reply to: Lashon hara question #1227709
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    The Gedolim encourage girls in their 30s to talk to boys.

    ?

    in reply to: who is "The Gadol Haddar" of America #1228600
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Randomex, Rav Herschel Schachter, Rav Gedalia Schwartz, Rav Mordechai Willig.

    🙂

    in reply to: who is "The Gadol Haddar" of America #1228597
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    I am not a gadol (or Modern Orthodox).

    in reply to: Very Important Public Service Announcement for all posters #1228777
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    if an anonymous writer, who may or may not even be who they claim they are

    So what?

    responding to a person who may or may not be serious and who may or may not be who they claim they are

    Translation – you, the reader (or maybe some

    other poster, in which case, again, so what?).

    Hurtful things are hurtful no matter who writes them.

    in reply to: Single vs double hole tzitzit #1225886
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    I wear 2-hole tzitzis (for the reason mentioned), and I’m not chassidish.

    in reply to: who is "The Gadol Haddar" of America #1228562
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Who are the Modern Orthodox gedolim?

    in reply to: Daylight saving time actually doesn't make sense. #1226118
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Rest assured that it helps no one, and that there is an increase

    in traffic and workplace accidents for a week or so to boot.

    in reply to: It is the same tune!!! #1225980
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Speaking of Allan Sherman, Uncle Moishy’s

    “Good Advice” is based on his “Good Advice.”

    in reply to: Last minute zombie costume #1225896
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    You can get a traffic cone off the street,

    or a bucket from the hardware store.

    Planet Naught Costumes

    I hope that excellent pun was intentional.

    in reply to: who is "The Gadol Haddar" of America #1228537
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    “for the Yeshiveshe” / “for the baal habatim”

    What do you mean by that?

    in reply to: Miracle in the CR #1224793
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Like RebYidd said, it was a while back.

    I think it was shortly after you got a subtitle.

    in reply to: Miracle in the CR #1224791
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    I noticed the name capitalization, but I assumed you had requested it.

    Me too.

    in reply to: Halacha: no chametz or sell chametz? #1225847
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    I like Marmite.

    in reply to: Miracle in the CR #1224774
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    What are the other new features (besides tags)?

    in reply to: Clarity feedback request #1222202
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Nu, Avram? I know you’re here (on the CR)…

    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Apparently this story is told about Rav Reuven Grozovsky.

    This sounds kind of strange to me… I’d like to see a reference

    to any source, printed or electronic, that talks about this.

    in reply to: Miracle in the CR #1224772
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Given what was happening, I simply assumed that to be the case…

    I think Joseph knows his way around WordPress.

    in reply to: 'I Remember When…' For the Coffee Room #1222231
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    …an online game I really like is closing at the end of the month

    In the end, it didn’t close, but I haven’t played in a while now.

    in reply to: Clarity feedback request #1222201
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    I repeat my request. (If my new post isn’t up yet, it should be shortly.)

    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Updated:

    Mixtour (designed by Dieter Stein)

    Number of players: 2

    You will need:

    A 5×5 grid to place pieces on and 22 pieces for each player

    (a different color for each). The pieces must all be able to

    be stacked on top of each other. If playing a “tournament” game,

    4 tokens of some kind are also needed. (Pieces from backgammon,

    checkers, or Connect Four are well suited. Rummikub tiles can also

    be used, with 1 player’s tiles face down. I’m not sure you’ll need the

    full 22 pieces if you’re not playing the “tournament” game.)

    Setup:

    Place each player’s pieces within their reach.

    (The board is empty at the start of the game.)

    Gameplay:

    The object of the game is to create a stack of 5 or more pieces

    with one of your own pieces on top (if the other player creates

    the stack, that also counts).

    The players alternate turns (choose a first player by any method).

    On their turn, players must take 1 of the following 2 actions:

    1. Place one of their own pieces on an empty space of the board.

    2. Move at least one piece from one occupied space to another occupied space, stacking the moved piece(s) on top of the piece(s) already there.

    The rules of movement are as follows:

    Either player can move any piece. If there are multiple pieces

    stacked on a space, the player can move as many of them as they

    desire from the top down (without changing their order).

    Example – a space has the following combination of pieces

    stacked on it:

    P1(A)

    P2(B)

    P2(C)

    P1(D)

    Either player can move A, A+B, A+B+C, or A+B+C+D, but they

    cannot change the vertical order of those pieces, or move any piece

    without moving the pieces above it.

    The movements that can be made with a piece or stack do not

    depend on the piece(s) being moved, but rather on the piece(s)

    that are being moved onto. However many pieces are in the

    destination stack, that is the exact distance from which pieces

    can be moved onto it – for example, if a stack has 3 pieces in it,

    any stack that is exactly 3 spaces away in any direction,

    orthogonal or diagonal, can be moved onto it.

    However, the spaces between the two stacks must be empty –

    pieces cannot be moved past occupied spaces.

    Visual aids (#=destination stack, X=legal move, O=illegal move):

    O O O O O

    O X X X O

    O X 1 X O

    O X X X O

    O O O O O

    The space in the center has a 1-piece stack on it, so any

    stack that is 1 space away from it can be moved onto it.

    X O X O X

    O O O O O

    X O 2 O X

    O O O O O

    X O X O X

    The space in the center has a 2-piece stack on it, so any

    stack that is 2 spaces away from it can be moved onto it,

    (assuming that the space between them is empty).

    O O O O O

    O O O O O

    O O 3 O O

    O O O O O

    O O O O O

    The space in the center has a 3-piece stack on it, so any stack

    that is 3 spaces away from it would be able to be moved onto it,

    except that no spaces are a distance of 3 from the center space,

    so no pieces can be moved onto the center space (rather, the stack

    in the center would have to be moved to make use of its pieces).

    Winning:

    When a stack of 5 pieces is created, the player

    whose piece is on top of the stack wins the game.

    “Tournament” variant – for a longer, more strategic game, play as follows:

    When a stack of 5 pieces is created, it is removed from the board

    (and its pieces returned to their owners) – all other pieces on

    the board remain in place. The player whose piece was on top of

    the stack takes a token. When a player takes their third token,

    they win the game.

    in reply to: Jewish books #1225792
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Go, My Son by Chaim Shapiro.

    in reply to: Art thread #1222565
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    I recall there being some discussion here recently about that,

    with people saying that’s actually not necessary. What’s your source?

    (I don’t remember where the discussion was. Can anyone point us to it?)

    in reply to: Jewish books #1225773
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    I’ve edited the post for clarity.

    in reply to: Jewish books #1225769
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    It does shock me the in the frum commnity almost everyone has heard of the Chosen (Its actally is quite positive towards the frum community) but in the general secular world Portonys Complaint is one of the most famous books of Jewish Literature

    The New Yorker called it “one of the dirtiest books ever published,”

    and you wonder why the frum world isn’t familiar with it?

    in reply to: Just testing something, no need to read this #1221953
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    It was the tag system I was testing

    (to see if posts were unmoderated, I could’ve posted anywhere).

    in reply to: Miracle in the CR #1224759
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    The tag.

    in reply to: Miracle in the CR #1224757
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    Whoever adds a tag to a thread can also remove it.

    in reply to: Miracle in the CR #1224754
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    You can’t see other people’s posts before approval, that is.

    I’m still seeing my thread (which was not requested by any mods).

    in reply to: Miracle in the CR #1224750
    ?? Rand0m3x ?
    Participant

    You can now see that posts have been added,

    but you can’t see them until they’re approved.

    Also, it looks like tags are working again.

    Edit: I’m seeing yellow…

    Edit: It seems you can now edit new

    threads before they’re approved. Cool.

Viewing 50 posts - 1,201 through 1,250 (of 2,752 total)