☕ DaasYochid ☕

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 11,451 through 11,500 (of 20,615 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: bad habits… #1032658
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    CBT?

    in reply to: True Achdus #1032566
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I’m not sure we should be defining “achdus” according to Webster.

    Comparing fans celebrating the Yankees winning to klal Yisroel davening for someone? Sorry, he lost me there.

    I do agree that davening for those boys together didn’t suddenly solve our achdus issues, but I think he misses an important point, from which maybe we can build toward more achdus.

    Klal Yisroel inherently is one – ????? ???????? ?????? ???? ??? ?? ???. Our unity in tefillah should be a reminder of this fact, that despite our differences, we are still on the same “team”.

    His implied suggestion that all or at least some of us should concede our deeply held beliefs for the sake of achdus is not something I think is reasonable or correct.

    What we can and should do the next time we encounter someone with whom we may disagree, even passionately, is realize that despite those differences, we would still stop to change a flat tire, and still offer heartfelt tefillos in an eis tzara, lo aleinu. Because despite different approaches, we are one, and despite disagreement, we love each other.

    in reply to: Orthodox Jews and Psychology #1121036
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I’m certainly the only one on the CR who has ever conceded something.

    Well, considering how often you’re wrong, that would make sense.

    in reply to: Orthodox Jews and Psychology #1121035
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Here is where popa conceded the utility of CBT:

    http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/cbt/page/2#post-506762

    in reply to: CBT #1032519
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Reading through this thread gave me “happy thoughts”, so I was able to skip today’s session.

    It’s been a good day. Earlier, I called GEICO and saved 15% on my auto insurance.

    in reply to: Not losing Daas Torah #1033143
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Yes, and I think he is probably exaggerating the extent of any such license.

    in reply to: Orthodox Jews and Psychology #1121027
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Maybe we should open a new thread??!!!

    http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/cbt

    in reply to: Orthodox Jews and Psychology #1121018
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Cold Beer Therapy is even more effective.

    in reply to: Not losing Daas Torah #1033139
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I can’t comment on the C”S or Mahara”m Shick, which I haven’t seen inside, but some of the sources predate reform, plus those who follow their tradition have the right to take the sources literally.

    in reply to: Babysitting #1032541
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I think if a clueless mother or father offers payment far exceeding the prevalent rate, the babysitter should tell them.

    in reply to: Not losing Daas Torah #1033133
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Are you calling the S’dei Chemed or his sources dishonest?

    I hope this is not what Sam meant.

    Agav, that context definitely exists today.

    http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/banning-bris-milah-in-the-united-states

    in reply to: Not losing Daas Torah #1033131
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    We daven today from siddurim while they used to daven baal peh. So is it now okay to cut Shemonah Esrei to 15 brachos?

    in reply to: Not losing Daas Torah #1033129
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    DaMoshe, I don’t know if that’s true or not, but how is that relevant to MBP, specifically its function in the realm of halacha and kabbalah, as opposed to only refuah?

    in reply to: Not losing Daas Torah #1033128
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    (the context of the pro-MBP teshuvos)

    In what way is the mareh makom I brought not relevant to MBP today? There are (at least) two arguments pro MBP; one is that it gets the ?? ??????? ???????. This is indeed irrelevant and out of context if another method is equally effective.

    But the sources which say that metzitzah b’peh (davka) is part of the mitzvah, either for halachic or kabbalistic reasons are wholly relevant.

    The arrogance and condescension of those who think that certain groups in klal Yisroel are either incapable of determining the level and balance of risk/reward or don’t care about their children is astounding and horrifying.

    in reply to: Orthodox Jews and Psychology #1121008
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Waiting for popa to say CBT is naarishkeit…

    Kind of welcome. 🙂

    in reply to: Girl giving the "yes" first in shidduchim #1070744
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I don’t think that’s what I said.

    Why do the numbers affect who is asked first?

    I had assumed as Lior did, and that the numbers exacerbate the issue, because the boy is more likely to say no.

    in reply to: Not losing Daas Torah #1033124
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Why can’t they both be issues?

    It’s not the issue I was addressing, and the “viciously pro MBP” side is defending its rights, not trampling on others’.

    The lives of Jews trump even mitzvot from the Torah. MBP is not one of the three for which we give up our lives.

    Ah, a halachic statement. So can we agree to leave the issue to halachic decisors?

    I can assure you that the pro MBP side is aware of the fact that milah is not from the gimmel chamuros, and hold that MBP does not halachically constitute pikuach nefesh.

    in reply to: Simchas Torah and women #1035598
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    It violates the clear language in every Ashkenazic Ketubah

    It is based on mechilah. If I lend you money with a shtar, and then forgive the loan, are either of or both of us violating that shtar?

    The trade off Lior speaks of is not halachic, it’s the benefit of the talmud Torah vs. the cost in chinuch and in some cases tzniyus (which is often a trade off for men as well in their workplaces).

    in reply to: -1 years? #1036156
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    29, do you mean when a post is approved right after it’s posted?

    Shopping, no thanks for debunking my claim of ruach hakodesh. 🙂

    in reply to: Not losing Daas Torah #1033120
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    No, Sam, to me the issue is the vicious anti MBP movement, which seeks to stop people from practicing milah in a manner their ancestors have done for generations, and which they believe, with backing from numerous legitimate sources, to have religious significance, whether it be al pi nigleh or nistar.

    I’m not arguing that everyone should follow the sources I quoted; the other opinion is also valid.

    PAA, I didn’t think so, and I responded as I did because my intention of quoting the S’dei Chemed was as I just explained.

    Agav, on the next page from the one I linked, he brings what seems to be a nice raya from the Gemara that MBP is not just medicinal (although I haven’t been m’ayen in it).

    in reply to: R' Chaim Kanievski Women Wearing Tefillin #1046875
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Thanks. PAA had explained that, I had responded appropriately based on that, and I’m pretty sure I knew that the Maharshal’s last name was Luria. I have no idea why I said I wasn’t familiar with it, other than not having heard if it prior.

    in reply to: Not losing Daas Torah #1033117
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Right, and the opinion of those quoted by the S’dei Chemed argues on Rav Kook and the Binyan Tzion and Rav Moshe.

    in reply to: Rosh Hashana davening in BP #1099483
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Popa can go out and eat herring while DaMoshe sings. He can pretend there’s a YCT guy saying a drasha.

    in reply to: Not losing Daas Torah #1033114
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14156&st=&pgnum=250

    Key phrase: ???? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ??? ????

    ????? ????? ??? ????? ???? ??????? ??? ???

    ?????? ?????? ??? ???) ???? ??? ????? ??? ????? ?????)

    ?????? ???? ????? ???? ????? ????? ??????? ???? ?????

    ??? ??????? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ?? ???? ???

    ????? ???? ???? ?????? ???? ?? ???? ??? ?????? ??? ??????

    ?? ???? ??? ????? ???? ????? ?? ?? ??? ??????? ??? ???

    ???????? ?????? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????? ???? ?? ???? ??

    ??? ???? ???? ?? ?????

    in reply to: Yomim Noraim davening #1100571
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I’m not sure you know which one I’m referring to, which has been used by a couple of baalei tefillah I’ve heard.

    in reply to: Not losing Daas Torah #1033113
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Right, and the other opinion argues with the Chasam Sofer.

    in reply to: Yomim Noraim davening #1100569
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Some sing it to Menuchah V’simchah.

    Google “ropshitz waltz”. There’s a sample on Mostly Music from Time to Dance Vol. 1.

    in reply to: Not losing Daas Torah #1033110
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I believe that the MBP advocates hold it’s not just medicinal.

    in reply to: Yomim Noraim davening #1100567
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Ropshitzer waltz.

    in reply to: Rosh Hashana davening in BP #1099481
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Find out where DaMoshe is davening, and then let us know how it was.

    in reply to: Have you even been a juror? #1033176
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    OMG popa, that was you??!!

    in reply to: Living Aboard a Boat #1032554
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Here’s my post; a discussion about ping pong on Shabbos veered off into bicycles (and then how to treat the words of Chazak with the proper respect).

    http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/ping-pong-on-shabbos#post-496452

    in reply to: Living Aboard a Boat #1032553
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Actually, the accepted halacha is that using a bicycle is prohibited on Shabbos. The reason is a bit unclear; one source I found (I think I posted it here once) says it’s because one might come to fix it.

    in reply to: Seminary vs Sherut Leumi #1037401
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Despite being in favor of domestic seminary as the default (meaning that I acknowledge that EY is better for some, but think the majority should stay), I will mention some advantages I’ve heard given to sem in EY.

    Independence.

    Experiencing how people live in EY. Seeing people living an austere lifestyle yet being happy serving Hashem makes an impact.

    More choices. This is circular, but is nevertheless the current reality.

    The hashkafos are better absorbed in a totally new environment, and specifically in EY where the haskafos are more intense and more passionately held.

    Better Fro-Yo.

    in reply to: Is it ever proper to withhold a get? #1032229
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Particularly *what facts and points* from your observation and discussion have led you to believe in this as a default “assumption” as opposed to waiting for a case by case evaluation rather than making an “assumption”?

    Kids do best with both parents, but in the unfortunate situations where that’s not possible, they do better with the mother than with the father.

    This wasn’t really my point, though, because I can definitely envision (and have seen) cases where they’re better off with the father. My point was the same as fny’s, that there’s practically no such thing as a tie.

    I’d also be interested in hearing your guess as to what changed from previous generations.

    You’ll have to use your imagination. Last time I hazarded a guess, you treated it as if I claimed it was Torah miSinai.

    in reply to: Not losing Daas Torah #1033101
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    What the source is probably depends on one’s definition of the term.

    in reply to: To those that sell on ebay and amazon #1032062
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Can’t listings be suspended temporarily?

    in reply to: Simchas Torah and women #1035566
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Maharatotai nevareches

    Lol, that has a nice ring to it.

    in reply to: Seminary vs Sherut Leumi #1037388
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    (I’m getting a helmet for when writersoul gets back)

    in reply to: Seminary vs Sherut Leumi #1037387
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    It gives girls the much needed break from their dysfunctional homes.

    in reply to: Is it ever proper to withhold a get? #1032225
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Observation and discussion.

    in reply to: Is it ever proper to withhold a get? #1032223
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    There are times the father is more capable, it’s just not the majority.

    “We” is referring to Torah society.

    I do share that assumption.

    I could guess what changed, but it’s not relevant.

    in reply to: Is it ever proper to withhold a get? #1032221
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    It so happens that in our generation, we do assume that a child is better off in the mother’s care, but that wasn’t why I agreed with fny. I just think it’s unlikely that the situation is equal, and rather than decide it by flipping a coin, we’ll decide according to who was at greater fault in the divorce.

    in reply to: Everyone Must Answer: Your Favorite Song #1032970
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    El Hanaar is indeed a nice song. The album as a whole is terrific. There’s a gap between tracks 19-23, but other than that, it’s great.

    in reply to: Seminary vs Sherut Leumi #1037382
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    i still can’t believe seminaries lock girls in

    Which is worse, that, or when they lock them out?

    in reply to: Seminary vs Sherut Leumi #1037381
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I know a girl who did sherut leumi by working in a seminary. I guess we could both agree that is bad?

    I had missed this. Yes, I suppose.

    The chilluk I am making, to be clear, is that the normal setup in seminary is supposed to be where the vast majority of interaction is among females, and interaction with males is pretty much limited to the very controlled environment of the classroom. Any more personal interaction should be an aberration, and unacceptable.

    An office setup is much worse. Even an ordinary, non sheirut leumi mixed work environmenti is risky, and when combined with compulsion, according to my understanding, it becomes assur.

    in reply to: Is it ever proper to withhold a get? #1032218
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Lior, in theory, yes, but AFAIK, it doesn’t happen.

    in reply to: English Sefer on Hilchos Tefilin #1031994
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Rav Shimon Eider zt”l wrote one.

    in reply to: Babysitting #1032525
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I’m against c-sections. If a kid is mature enough to be born, he is mature enough to do it on his own.

    in reply to: Intelligent Life #1032030
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Sam, there could be haskafic problems when someone’s opinions diverge from reality.

Viewing 50 posts - 11,451 through 11,500 (of 20,615 total)