gavra_at_work

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 2,051 through 2,100 (of 6,087 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Isn't this YESHIVA world? #948321
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    dells – Joe still hasn’t run out of letter combinations. He will eventually.

    in reply to: The Big Lie�Tzedokoh Solicitation by Mail #948237
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Even the unsolicited shaimos (a pet peeve of mine)?

    If I don’t open it…..

    Al Pi Rov, there is no Shaimos.

    in reply to: Isn't this YESHIVA world? #948308
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    You have clearly never met a yeshiva bochur. Almost no yeshiva bochurim have beards, and most girls are somewhat taken aback when they date one who does.

    Agreed. Now (as well as then), it is (was) considered extreme Ga’avah for a Bochur to have a beard for no reason.

    PBA: Have you had a chance to get the list of points from Rav Lichtenstien yet?

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948595
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Daniel Rosen: I suggest that you, who knows the Da’as of why people do things, should complain. Myself, who is trying to be Dan LKaf Zechus and doesn’t claim to be a “Yodeah Machashavos”, will leave it alone.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948594
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Why assume that they are purchasing the bag for the Gucci label perhaps Gucci makes a higher quality product than a handbag you would buy at Kmart and therefore it will last longer and perhaps Gucci guarantees the quality of the bag and replaces it if it tears.

    This. I have had “brand name” products that have been totally worn out, and sent back to be “fixed” and they did so without complaint (as wear & tear is under warrenty). Another time I regretted not buying the brand name, as the “generic” wore out way quicker than the brand & I ended up paying more. Sometimes its worthwhile to spend the extra dollar now and save later.

    in reply to: The Big Lie�Tzedokoh Solicitation by Mail #948233
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    All Tzedaka mailings to our home get filed directly into the circular filing cabinet.

    There are Halachos in SA as per whom you are supposed to give Tzedaka. A mailing does not change these Halachos.

    in reply to: Lapid's new Arrangement Law #947998
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    I.e. they can teach Kodesh for no more than 25% – 45% of the day and still get subsidies.

    Someone didn’t learn their core curriculum math. Try again.

    in reply to: Isn't this YESHIVA world? #948257
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    I read Rav Lichtenstien’s article on the future of “Centrist Orthodoxy”, where he defines what he considers the 5 points that distinguish “centrist orthodoxy”. (He means MO.) I considered it a pretty good summation of the issue, and I’d say if you agree with those 5, then you are MO.

    PBA: Would you mind please summarizing those points here? I’m curious to see how many (if any) of them I would agree with.

    Thanks.

    in reply to: Defend Yourself! #947725
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    rationalfrummie: I now understand where you are going with this, let me repeat it:

    We have had examples of high-powered women in the past (and have dealt with their status in Halacha), but they were few and far between. Now that it is more common, we have to ask ourselves whether we should evolve our societal norms based on the external norms.

    My (obvious, I think) answer to that is yes. Making women more comfortable to show their Ma’aros to a Baki, or Shailos in Basar V’chalav is always a good thing, so including women is a positive. I’m reminded of the story (IIRC, it is a medrash Tanchuma) regarding a Kohen teaching his wife to view Ma’aros of Tzaraas, and this would be no different.

    That being said, the halachos of “Shrarra” are very different.

    For example, a Ger is excluded. This is due to the Pasukim that deal with Melucha (IIRC), and therefore would not change due to the “positions of power” that a woman may hold in the boardroom.

    This is being Dan L’Kaf Zechus that you don’t actually mean that real Halacha changes, but rather our approach to what we need in Halacha.

    in reply to: Defend Yourself! #947722
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Women today are businesswomen, artists, musicians, CEOs, scientists, and Torah scholars. How does Halacha respond to such change?

    All of which existed during the time of the Gemorah. Or are we forgetting Devorah HaNeviah?

    (As a side point, you are assuming the reason for the Halacha. That is a fallacy as well (I think that would be Circular cause and consequence?))

    in reply to: Chutzpa!!! #946792
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    don’t accuse a rabbi!

    😮

    Might I refer you to the following thread:

    Defend Yourself!

    and this one:

    Agudas Yisroel of America Plans Mass Tefila in Manhattan Against Draft Gezeria

    Edited

    in reply to: Defend Yourself! #947720
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Creating a ‘Rabbah’ is outside of even the stretchiest of stretched bounds of Halacha so how is someone who believes in doing so included?

    Who says? As long as she is not in a position of “Shrarah” over the Tzibbur, I don’t think it is a problem under pure Halacha (correct me if I am wrong). So she has a certificate that she knows Basar V’Chalav & Taaruvos. Halevai every Seminary would teach such useful halacha, instead of the Tiflus that they teach now.

    in reply to: Defend Yourself! #947718
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    GAW – Shall we start with staying within bounds of Halacha (in its diversity, not necessarily the uber-machmir position), not being a kofer/apikores as defined by the Gemoro and Rambam in yad (so not in the modern throwaway sense of either word), having middos tovos and then work from there…

    So you have excluded all those who call fellow Yidden “Reshaim Gemurim” just because the (supposed Reshaim) no longer want to pay for them (the namecallers) to sit and learn (and/or want their children to have a better chance of survival) (certainly not Middos Tovos)? And you have included those who would create a Rabbah. I have no proof (myself, it may exist) that Rabbi Saul Lieberman was a Kofer, and should therefore be included.

    I’ll grant you that Boruch Spinoza was not a Talmid Chacham.

    in reply to: Chutzpa!!! #946783
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    HaLeiVi: Aderaba, whomever relied on the public to feed their children was wrong in the first place. I would have hoped a “Charad L’Devar Hashem” would not be B’davka over the Gemorah (and as paskened by the Shulchan Aruch Even HaEzer Siman Ayin Alef). The Shulchan Aruch (there) calls someone like that “worse than a Tamei bird”, and although I am not Choshesh my fellow Yidden to be doing such an Avairah, perhaps Mr. Porush (unfortunately) does.

    in reply to: Defend Yourself! #947716
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    If it was something that was indisputably contrary to being a Talmid Chochom then then you’d be correct

    Begging the question. What is “indisputably contrary to being a Talmid Chochom”? Being the head of JTS? Giving Smicha to a “Rabbah”? Excluding yourself from the majority of the Klal? Being caught with a Zonah? Calling a Rosh Yeshiva “Caveman”? The Halacha being Paskened like you in only 6 instances?

    I can make an argument for any of these (maybe not the last one). Or for none.

    in reply to: All Children Who Leave Our Community Should Pain Us Equally #947399
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    But I also feel, that if it does happen, the best case scenario would be that the child becomes educated and becomes a productive member of society, as opposed to just wasting away like I’m sure we have all witnessed.

    I see your point from a completely different angle.

    We have 613 Mitzvos in the Torah + 7 D’rabbanan. Each time a mitzva is done (whether Bain Adam L’Makom or Bain Adam L’Chavairo) it is a Zechus and a fulfillment of Hashem’s word. If someone is “OTD”, they may very possibly be doing more mitzvos and be “better” in Hashem’s book than someone who is “officially” On the Derech, but cheats others, hurts his wife, etc. Part of Hashem’s Torah is to be kind, not cheat, be honest, honor your parents, etc. It is not a Zero-sum equation. A non-Frum Jew who eats Kosher this one time instead of Traif, or deals honestly in business instead of cheating, or joins the family for the Seder & eats Matza (even if he will eat Chometz the next day) will get incredible Zechusim in Shomayim for those acts.

    With that idea in mind, it is obvious that someone who made an honest life for themselves is doing more of what Hashem wants

    than someone who is “on the streets”.

    in reply to: Defend Yourself! #947714
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Let us resolve to respect not only each other, but also those termed “gedolim” by those who mean it as “manhigim”, by simply respecting them and not condemning them but if we must, rather identify the particular action or decision that they are associated with that is problematic.

    Using the term “Gadol” automatically makes the statement beyond reproach in the Yeshivish/Charaidi world. This is a self contradictory statement.

    GAW sincerely believes that someone is not a Talmid Chochom because they did something GAW disagrees with, because if they were a TRUE Talmid Chochom they couldn’t have;

    When trying to define a Scotsman, one has to look at the qualities that make Scotsmen. The problem with this is that is goes so far that Rabbi Saul Lieberman may also be a Talmid Chacham.

    in reply to: Defend Yourself! #947713
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Slifkin’s many public statements and comments since completely prove that what was said about him was accurate.

    For example?

    in reply to: Defend Yourself! #947678
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    DaasYochid: He is probably hurt (for reasons unknown) and is therefore lashing out. I am sympathetic to the viewpoint (for a different reason, as I posted above), so I chose to defend him.

    His original post was: I’ll wait until I see it for myself, but if true, there is one Rabbi on that list who I somewhat respect and my respect would go down a bunch.

    The response was “and you must show respect for all talmidei chachomim. even if he isnt your rov. it is bizui talmidei chachomim to publicly pronounce your lack of respect for them”.

    Answer: What if I don’t think he’s a talmid chacham? Why do I need to show respect for someone I don’t respect at all?

    Response: “Hamevazeh talmeidai chachomim, ein lahem chelek li’olam haba…”.

    Truthfully (no pun intended), I agree (as I posted) with truthsharer on this specific point. If hypothetically I believe someone is not a talmid chacham, trotting out “Hamevazeh talmeidai chachomim” is circular logic (as I pointed out to Mdd on that thread). Furthermore, you would have to prove (and I’m not sure there is a case for it) that “not respecting” equals Bizayon.

    For example, I know of someone whom others believe is a Talmid Chachom. Without question, this person knows more Torah than I do. However, due to his actions, I sincerely believe he is not a valid Moreh Horah, and that his actions are detrimental to Klal Yisroel as a whole (whomever he/she may be, as there is still Lashon Hara involved). Is there a din of “Bizoi Talmidei Chachomim” regarding this person? I would say not, even if others say yes.

    in reply to: If all of Halacha was Given at Mt. Sinai, #946000
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    That’s very difficult to say when the pasuk explicitly states that the manner of death penalty for the Shabbos desecrator was not explicitly stated.

    I’m not sure what you mean by “that”. Would you mind expounding a bit?

    The Torah says ” ???????????? ?????, ????????????: ???? ??? ??????, ???-????????? ???.”

    The Gemorah explains in BB 119A:

    ????? ??? ??? ????? ??????? ????? ????? (???? ??) ?????? ??? ???? ??? ?? ??? ???? ??? ?? ???? ??? ????

    Assuming Torah Chasumah Nitna, that means Moshe knew the Mikoshsh should get skilah, but was unsure if the din was “ready” to be applied, as Hashem did not yet “officially” tell him.

    A similar question would have come up if a bird’s nest was found during the time the Beni Yisroel were in the Midbar. Since the Parsha of Shiluach Haken was not yet officially said, Moshe would not have been able to tell the BY to do the mitzva.

    in reply to: And they say I'M not a zionist #945915
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    DY: Get a Lafah and BBQ some lamb shish kabob. Wrap the lamb together with Romaine in the Lafah and say Zecher L’Mikdash.

    in reply to: If all of Halacha was Given at Mt. Sinai, #945998
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Which death penalty to give to the Sabbath desecrator

    Pesach Sheini

    Inheritence when there are daughter(s) but no sons

    The gemorah discusses each of these cases, IIRC (Megalgalin). From what I have learned, according to the Shittah of Torah Chasumah Nitna (that we are assuming), the question was one of applicability (meaning if the Halacha as will be tought should be applied at that point), not of knowledge.

    in reply to: If all of Halacha was Given at Mt. Sinai, #945994
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    DY: It is a question of application, which may differ Al Pi Svorah.

    in reply to: If all of Halacha was Given at Mt. Sinai, #945988
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Talmud: 2 points:

    1: Not all Halacha was given at Sinai (wait before you call me a Kofer). New cases which did not exist come up, and being a Posek Halacha is working the process of how to pasken and where to place the question. A perfect example of this is the “Shabbos Mode” ovens which the Star-K allows to be adjusted on Yom Tov.

    2: Already at the time of Yehoshua, many Halachos were forgotten. You have to remember that the TSBP was transmitted orally, which is ripe for breeding mistakes. Many times in the Gemorah we have two talmidim who say the exact opposite B’shem their Rebbe, while their Rebbe only held one opinion.

    in reply to: PHOTO: Orthodox Jewish Man Covers Himself In Plastic Bag On Plane #945904
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    If there are shitos that mean the plastic big is unnecessary, it would appear that doing so is not really a Halacha but a Midas Chasidus, and would therefore be discouraged.

    WADR, this is completely untrue. Just because there is a valid Machlokes doesn’t make the “Machmir” side Middas Chassidus. It means that even B’dieved, one side holds it is Assur.

    The prototypical example of this is the Machlokes Bais Hillel & Bais Shammai regarding Tzaras Ervah. Bais Hillel actually held the children of such a union were real Mamzairim, not “Middas Chassidus” Mamzairim.

    in reply to: Mods? Mods? #1108092
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    YW Moderator-73: Fair enough.

    in reply to: Mods? Mods? #1108090
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    A question if you don’t mind: Why the subtitle change (I like this one better, I think)?

    in reply to: Mods? Mods? #1108089
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Thank you.

    in reply to: Mods? Mods? #1108088
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Request that my last post in the closed thread be approved. I don’t want people to think that I personally hold that everyone on the Moetzes is not a Talmid Chochom or Raui L’Horos.

    in reply to: Are you a belieber? #945644
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    All it TAKES. Just helping w/ the editing 🙂

    Thanks, or should I say thansk 🙂

    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    “We” obviously don’t.

    In case people didn’t realize, I’m arguing for Truthsharer. I personally have a large amount of respect (not as if they need my approval) for the Noviminsker and other members of the Agudah.

    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    GAW, look in the “Chafets Chaim” for the definition of a Talmud Chocham.

    Circular logic. Who is “Raui L’Horos”?

    Rabbi Avi Weiss? Rabbi Malkiel Kotler? Rabbi Norman Lamm? Rabbi Yitzchak Elchonon Spektor? Rabbi Abaye?

    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    The people on this post who are ripping the Atzeres Tefillah are being Mevazeh the Moetzes Gedolei Hatorah who are real Tzadikkim. Rabbi Sol Lieberman is not on the Moetzes.

    A True Belieber. 🙂 Kol HaKavod, but not logic. Abaye was also not on the Moetzes.

    in reply to: Are you a belieber? #945641
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    talmud: I did for editing.

    I hear, but disagree. Eretz Yisroel could use all the support it can get.

    in reply to: Atlas Shrugged and the Torah #946453
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Not a Troll. Thanks PBA and my apologies.

    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    While there is indeed some grey area about where the issur of being mevazeh tamlidai chachamim is said, I think we all agree that it does not include being mevazeh Saul Lieberman and does include being mevazeh the entire Moetzes.

    “We” obviously don’t.

    What if I don’t think he’s a talmid chacham? Why do I need to show respect for someone I don’t respect at all?

    The difference is that I did not in any way disparage the D”L.

    Sure you did. That you don’t realize it makes it worse.

    “We are so much better than you. You rely on hetairim and we never would, because only we are Torah True (TM) Jews”.

    I’m just judging the facts as I see them. IIRC (and I could be wrong), Rav Chaim said something similar about the Charaidi system not being set up to withstand questions to Emunah or the outside world. Rav Dessler certainly said the system is set up as such. So at least I have a backup in Rav Dessler.

    in reply to: Are you a belieber? #945636
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    I read about it as well, and I thought well of it. Anne Frank was “normal”, and the point was that any teen/preteen alive today could have been Anne Frank. All it takse is for a dictator to get into is head (or more accurately, for Hashem to put in his head) to wipe out a specific group, and there you go.

    It does not make me a “belieber”?, but in general the guy has been pro-yidden & EY. IIRC he ignored some of the boycott calls when he performed (or will perform) in EY (sorry). Good for Yidden in my book.

    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Intersting that one side of the debate keeps bringing up money, and insisting that is what the other is all about, when the other doesn’t mention it at all.

    Being that the entire change between the new and old law is financial, I would have thought that money would figure more prominently in the discussion. In fact, in the Ami article about the new law, the Charaidim (and I forget who it was specifically) said he expects the US Yidden to make up the financial difference, so there will be no loss of Torah learning (and if that happens (for example, Lakewood merges with the Mir and moves to Yerushalayim), I would be thrilled. As opposed to others, I am not interested in the Charaidim joining the army.).

    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    I did not make up the concept of hamevazeh talmeidai chachomim, ein lahem chelek li’olam haba; the Gemara (brought down li’halacha by the Rambam) did. The fact that this does not apply to Saul Lieberman hardly disproves the entire idea.

    Who says it doesn’t apply? You? The “Gedolim”? Which ones? Does it apply to Rabbi Avi Weiss? Rabbi Malkiel Kotler? Rabbi Norman Lamm? Rabbi Yitzchak Elchonon Spektor? Rabbi Abaye?

    Who? And who decides?

    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Actually, the Charaidim just won’t rely on the vast majority of the heterim that the D”L will.

    To quote:

    Actually, they’re just paskening what they honestly believe to be the truth. Is it so hard to accept that somebody just honestly disagrees with you? Why do you have to assume the worst and sink to such disparagement?

    🙂

    And your answer will be:

    I know. That is unfortunate 🙁

    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Actually, I’m just saying what I honestly believe to be the truth.

    I know. That is unfortunate 🙁

    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Joe: How many is that in the past week? You are going to run out of letter combinations!!

    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    A counter-protest should be organized.

    Eh, why bother. I don’t care enough what Gur does to welcome their Rebbe (as per the main site) to protest it.

    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    even though, if you believe in the Torah, this Israeli Gov. is committing Suicide.

    There are a number of reasons why this is incorrect. The main reason (IMHO) is that the current Bizayon HaTorah will end once every single Charaidi is no longer assumed to be a learner for life. This will increase Kavod HaTorah, Kavod Shomayim and (together with the increased Achdus) will be a net gain in the Zechusim for Klal Yisroel.

    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    You think this is appropriate talk and description of the situation?

    ROB: The askanim are so scared that their funds will be cut off that they will say ANYTHING to rally others to their cause. Don’t blame Kanoi, he is just parroting what the “askonim” have said that the “Gedolim” would want him to say.

    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Hamevazeh talmeidai chachomim, ein lahem chelek li’olam haba…

    So when you are Mevaze “Rabbi” Saul Lieberman, you have no Chelek? It is nice to spout terms without knowing the consequences of your thoughts, in your haste to support “the Gedolim”.

    What the Israeli Chareidim refuse to do is to go to the army, because they find it a spiritually dangerous environment.

    I agree with this. The Charaidi education system is so poor that while the Rav Kook Chardal sector of Israel has no problem with the Army, the Charaidim would all go off the Derech if they joined. It says much about the shallowness of Charaidi emunah.

    We actually see this in this sad story. The Charaidim (by that, I mean the askanim and those who run the society, not those like Rav Chaim who want nothing other than to sit and learn all day without distraction) “placed their trust” in politics instead of the Ribbono Shel Olam. This is the result.

    in reply to: If this is what we've been waiting 2000 years for… #1073640
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    That is too funny to think about. Imagine if a poster like me were really Christian.

    Exactly! It fits with the “personality”

    I do want to see that. Also how other people answer the question.

    Did I disappoint you?

    in reply to: If this is what we've been waiting 2000 years for… #1073638
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    I would have become Christian.

    Strangely enough, you (at least on this site) are eccentric enough that it wouldn’t shock me if either:

    1: You already are

    2: You really mean that

    3: You just want to see what reactions you will get

    4: You are really bored today

    So which one is it? 😉

    in reply to: 4th of July vs yom haatzmaut #943961
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    Avi K: As in the story of Purim, we do not celebrate as long as the fighting is still going on (“Pivotal action” or not). We celebrate when the fighting is over and Boruch Hashem we were saved from being driven into the Yam.

    Sorry I didn’t respond earlier, and thanks to Popa for bumping this.

    in reply to: Yom Hashoah, any thoughts? #944641
    gavra_at_work
    Participant

    ROB: Bobov says it 🙂

Viewing 50 posts - 2,051 through 2,100 (of 6,087 total)