?????? ?????? ????? ??????? ?? ??? ?????

BTW, I did write another thread, where i pointed out the interesting thing of the hurricane coming on the yohrtzeit of the Chazoin Ish.

On risk of being accused of sounding like the protocols of the elders of zion;

we all know that

???? ??????? ???? ?? ??????

The Brisker Rov ??”? clearly expressed his opinion, even after the war started, that it was preferable to risk one’s life in europe than one;s neshomo in communist russia.

R’ Mattisyohu Salomon has been known toexpress “Voss hoben zei oifgetohn az zei gerattevet alle yaldei tehran, und zei shpeiter upgeshmad?” – What was the purpose of saving the yaldei tehran and then forcing them into non religious kibbutzim.

When I married Mr. Right, I didn’t realise that his first name was Always.

Although i am not out to defend the british, i would like to point out a couple of things.

a) the british never actually SANK any ships of refugees, directly killing yidden. they turned numerous ships back, which eventually sank, and thereby caused many deaths, but they never actually sank any ships.

b) the british made the mistake of appointing a yiddishe high commisioner, Sir herbert Samuel, for eretz yisroel. In an attempt to prove his lack of bias,he leaned heavily towards the arab side.

c) During WWII the brittish allowed numerous refugees into eretz yisroel, by turning a blind eye to numerous ships, on both an indivual and and governmental level, saving numerous lives. In the entire period, the us only once turned a blind eye, during 1938, on intervention of morgenthau.

d) The brittish allowed unlimited refugees into England during the entire war, [with esception of enemy citizens], and was actually one of the very few safe havens – although many failed to take advantage.

e) The british prime minister immediately befre the war was a well known coward, called neville chamberlain. Since he was that after the british would leave e”y the arabs would win any war, he therefore leaned towards the arab side in terms of immigration.

f) The british were attacked many times by the Etzel and Lechi groups, (and retaliated), this obviously did nothing to help the british – israeli relationship.

g) over 75% of the land mass britian had in the mid east was given directly into arab hands some way or another, including much of present day jordan, and icluding the sinai/suez peninsula, only conceded by antony eden to Egypt in 1956.

h) any democratically elected changing government will renege on promises mada under previous governments – no different than Obama reneged on promises made by previous presidents, to transfer the embassy top jerusalem.

i) ABOVE ALL, i highly doubt that the british are interested in returning to eretz yisroel – especailly as they will soon find themselves overrun by the few muslims who are not yet in france.

I was just wondering, in another thread you gave us all the gory details of how you may fit a man shoes, so usrely you’re problem is touching your uncles, not your nieces.

In terms of cousins marrying, what do you guys say to the following.

The oldest daughter of the tchernobler rebbe of benei berak, r’ nochum twersky, is married to his younger brother – i.e. her uncle. His second daughter is married to his nephew, i.e. her first cousin. These two sisters were then meshadech!!!! The chosson and kallah were first cousins, as were three of the parents!!!

The daughter of the imrei chayim of vitznitz, brocho z”l, was married to R’ moishe ernster. Their son, r’ mendel, married a daughter of the yeshuois moishe – his first cousin, while his son married a daughter of r’ yisroel – the present vizhnitzer rebbe. R’ yisroel was also meshadech with another bil, and a uncle!!!

Does the mishpacha count as shabbos lunch, or the shoes?

Maybe irene was connected to the gerrers refusal to vote for R’ meir Porush in the last mayoral election in e”y, and this is for the lack of achdus displayed by netzach hatoira and the gerrers refusing to recognise the rotation agreement.

i do not know if all these gareshead stories are true, but i would far more worried about what happens to a child who forgets to bring his sneakers to school than wearing weekday shoes on shabbos.

Why can’t hse marry a koihen?

ZD, you are 100% right, there was s post recently on YWN that the belzer rebbe told his chassidim to wear white socks on choil hamoied

If i have it right, in the last municipial elections, the Gerrer chassidim brought mr. nir barkat to power as mayor, and he promised to install a mizrachi Rabbi in the job, rather than somebody chareidi who diametrically opposes the state.

Since that election was a serious fight between R’ porush and the Gerrers, and since barkat actually kept many of his promises, this is a BIG ISSUE.

the rabbi does not too much power, but the mayor does.

Is this gateshead business real?

Yes, the children run there in their socks in the middle of fitting to write posts. 🙂

Romney

Sorry to get involved, but i think if you offer your mother that for two weeks you will not do anything crazy in school, she might just agree to buy you about six pairs of shabbos shoes.