nishtdayngesheft

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,451 through 1,500 (of 1,774 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Y.U. Abuse Scandal and Cover-Up #913540
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    The senseless vitriol is reserved for use on chareidim in a possibly similar case.

    in reply to: Y.U. Abuse Scandal and Cover-Up #913537
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    The story is just like Horace Mann school. And guess what, the response was the same. The question is if Professor R Lamm should still receive hundreds of thousands each year from YU, most of which he takes tax free.

    The responses on this thread are a clear indication of the dual standard in the CR.

    in reply to: Y.U. Abuse Scandal and Cover-Up #913523
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    I believe this is an example of the double standard.

    Oh, Zdad, Lamm’s response was that he was to busy with money at the time to deal with this. I am glad that you believe that is a response that you are happy with and do not have to post your many imbecilic posts. And you also feel that it’s a satisfactory answer that you do not have to identify them as ?????.

    in reply to: Double Standard in the Coffee Room #914513
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    I suspect there is a double standard in the coffee room. Otherwise you should see posts by Zdad about certain recent news story which you don’t see.

    in reply to: Shocking Study of Modern Orthodox OTD Rate #941630
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    ZDad,

    They have articles in a student magazine that rivals anything Feldman alleged in her fanciful work of fiction. A magazine that received funding from YU. An article that widely discussed in the secular media.

    Or have you forgotten.

    None of this is something to be proud of.

    in reply to: Good psychiatrist? #913015
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    There seem to be a number of people who can tell you psychiatrists who are ineffective based on their own experiences.

    in reply to: opposite gender therapists #912352
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    I find it moronic that a person who strongly defends opposite gender therapists on this thread writes eleswhere that he assumes a therapist is an abuser solely because he was with an opposite gender therapee.

    in reply to: Ah Gutten Erev Shabbos #914882
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Ketzele,

    You will see in my comment that it was specifically written ?? ????? ??. However the ????? in his famous ???? talks about the midah of ???. So perhaps in that vein it may be applicable.

    And what is unhealthy about you ketzeleh?

    in reply to: Loshon Horah names in the CR #912124
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    You can say l”h about a frei person anywhere.

    in reply to: Rebbes Affectionate with Children #1055880
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    And I don’t think it was chedar, I believe it was Gorgonzola.

    in reply to: Ah Gutten Erev Shabbos #914876
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Ketzeleh,

    A) There is no question he is low compared to R. Akiva Eiger.

    B) Frustrated me? No. He quite possibly.

    As long as you are taking issue with biting, did you read your friend “health”‘s screeds?

    And considering he used another screen name to write this comment, I guess the truth bothers him.

    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Z,

    What halacha forbids it? Can you make one up?

    Perhaps if it were at night. But I have no idea when this was. Nor do I believe anything listed in the media. And as as for what you’re saying, well you’re writing on a blog, and I made clear how much I believe that medium. And I am pretty certain I can accurately guess which other blogs you peruse for your sources.

    in reply to: Ah Gutten Erev Shabbos #914871
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Health,

    No, I do not agree. It was you who turned the whole topic off. Look back.

    Someone asked if there was an inyan. Yes there is an inyan, meaning a reason. You turned this into making up chumros. The one who blew the whole topic completely out of the original topic was you. And you said that someone who was doing this because of a chashash of R Akiva Eiger was being machadesh ponim batorah. Pretty heavy words for someone as low as you to say about R. Akiva Eiger.

    But you won’t admit that.

    On another thread you talk about a chazakah that you have. The real chazakah it seems is that you are irrationally stubborn.

    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Chalila,

    Is that what I said? Can you show me where I said that?

    I said there is no way you can make any sort of honest judgment by what you have read in the media or on blogs.

    How you stretched that comment to what you allege is beyond my comprehension.

    And it is somewhat troubling how you believe you can make any objective judgment if you are given to such convoluted leaps in this case.

    in reply to: Ah Gutten Erev Shabbos #914867
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    And by the way I presented straight facts, which is the reason you can’t present refutations. Certainly not when you contradict yourself continually on the same thread.

    May you be zoche to ????? ????.

    in reply to: Ah Gutten Erev Shabbos #914864
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Health,

    Thank you. You proved my point so much more clearly than I could have myself. ? ?????? ?????.

    in reply to: Ah Gutten Erev Shabbos #914860
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Health; “I said I know of only one RY that had this Chumrah!”

    No that is not what you said, what you actually said was “It comes from “1” Rosh Hayeshiva -so if you’re his Talmid..”. The emaphasis on 1 is yours, not mine nor from any one else.

    Not that you know of one Rosh Hayeshiva, rather that there is only one. Which you are obviously incorrect about.

    Besides the OP asked if there is any inyan for saying a gutten erev shabbos, which you eventually turned into someone being megalleh ponim batorah sheloh kehallacha.

    Your intolerance of another’s opinion is disturbing. To the point that any small sort of logic you may have had flies right out the window. And it is something you do consistently. On another thread you were already were passuling the geirus of someone based on something you think you saw while eating in a restaurant. And there are a myriad other examples.

    Perhaps this midah contributes to your current situation. You should seek help in rectifying it, you may find yourself to be much happier.

    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Chalila,

    I said I don’t know the case and I’m not following it. And I am not making statements as to who did what. Contrary to what you may have claimed before.

    I am saying that people making claims about the case when All they know is what they read in media in luring tho blog and others leaves no one with enough information to make an honest assessment. However it it is easier to make an assessment based on existing biases.

    I would say less than 1% of what is written in the NYT, NYP or NYDN is true. And what is written on the blogs you seem to be following are even less so. And my guess at percentages is based on instances where I actually witnessed things that were totally misrepresented in those media. Of where I have corresponded with the writers and caught them in numerous blatant lies.

    Which is as easy to with them as many of the comments here.

    in reply to: Ah Gutten Erev Shabbos #914854
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Health,

    You commented that it is “1” Rosh Yeshiva. Inferring that it is only 1. Shmendrick pointed out how ridiculous that was. You, as seems typical, totally went off a rampage and Connor fathom, let alone accept that you are wrong.

    Why would that be?

    Can this propensity possibly be affecting your life in many other ways? Have you considered seeking help?

    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Zdad,

    If you were willing to be honest with yourself you would acknowledge that you just have a unhealthy and unfounded proclivity to assume that chasidic men are wrong.

    As is obvious from 98% of your comments.

    I wonder if you will being honest with yourself any easier than being honest with others.

    in reply to: Rebbes Affectionate with Children #1055841
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Zdad,

    There are those who make all sorts of proclamations and it is clear they are living in a fantasy world of their own creation.

    Which would explain why they know absolutely everything about every topic. Because they created the world they are living in.

    ????.

    in reply to: Rebbetzin Kanievsky #910298
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    147,

    If you are concerned, return the book and wait to pay full price. The difference is not that great that it is worth such aggravation. I am sure it will be less than the therapy bills.

    in reply to: High Holiday Davening #910626
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Just,

    The point is that he wants to change the accepted/ established practice where he “may” be the hazan. Unilaterally. And the justification is because it is an aging Jewish center. So being an aging population is reason to make unilateral change?

    Were you being consistent in that concern of yours, that each should follow their established hangagah, you too would chastise him for his chutzpah.

    It has nothing to do with wether you say piyutim or not, it has to do with making a unilateral change to suit your current whimsy.

    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Syag,

    Your comment is silly in that you assume that a person has no right to defense. I don’t know this case nor am I following it, but it is quite likely that there a goodly number if people who know this man. And they believe they know him well and know that he could not have done such a thing. They may also know the other side and believe that they are completely likely to have made this up for whatever reason.

    In that case it is understandable why he had supporters who are doing what they can to help him.

    in reply to: Selling a Sefer to a Non-Orthodox "Synagogue" #910390
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Happen acne,

    Pointing out gross errors or lies are not ad hominem attacks. Neither is calling someone out on a patent falsehood. They are pointing out discrepancies. Referring to proof of your error as ad hominem is deflection.

    in reply to: Soferim Business #910822
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    R Landeesman was far from the only person who taught safrus. There are still many many people who teach safrus. I would say that he taught a minute percentage of professional sofrim.

    Silly comment for you to make.

    in reply to: please pass along; cars being TOWED from toys r us parking lot!! #1017381
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    I think Lesschumras should go to court and try to defend Fastway. He was so quick to do it here already.

    in reply to: Selling a Sefer to a Non-Orthodox "Synagogue" #910387
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    just my hapence,

    rebdaniel has mentioned a number of hashgachas that he eats from (because he “doesn’t paly hashgacha politics”). Those hashgachas do not even require plain glatt, let alone Beis Yosef glatt. Go look at his list, it’s a fact and easy to verify. Perhaps he is sephardi, but apparently he does not follow halacha according to sephardi p’sak.

    in reply to: Selling a Sefer to a Non-Orthodox "Synagogue" #910386
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    You say “I spoke with a Hassidishe shochet who trains in ofot and he said that for unmarried men and non-Satmar men, it is enormously difficult to get any work, since Empire and Rubashkin both use Nirbarter hashgacha.”

    One of you is lying (Or more likely rthe story is made up). The facts do not support this in the least. (regarding non-satmar) There is a long held minhag not to hire a bochur as a shochet. Nothing to do with Satmar.

    in reply to: High Holiday Davening #910617
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Rebdoniel,

    Being pompous does not make you sound intelligent nor does it make you correct.

    I know a number of people who were certfiable, they were committed to institutions who felt, and insisted everything they said and did was logical. However we know the truth. Their logic, besides other damamge it had done, landed them in an institution.

    Same is with you.

    in reply to: Neturei Karta. #1106127
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    ZD,

    So don’t drink it. No one is making you drink it.

    I don’t hold of coke. It says ???? ??.

    in reply to: Selling a Sefer to a Non-Orthodox "Synagogue" #910378
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    RN,

    I don’t think it is because he is anti, rather I think it is because he is lacking.

    in reply to: High Holiday Davening #910609
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Why would anyone in their right mind hire you or appoint you when you are intent on doing your own thing. It is the height of chutzpah for you to go somewhere and think you should change the nusach and minhag unilaterally.

    Beside the fact that you are singularly mis/uninformed.

    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Certainly insisting that there is no problem eating tolaim is a greater chilul Hashem than a trial in Brooklyn.

    Considering that chilul Hashem is based on causing other to be oiver on aveiros.

    Also tweeting from the trial is a huge chilul Hashem, in my opinion.

    And one has to wonder about someone who’s job is fundraising just to fund his own pocket. Yet using an organizations name and exemption to do so. When this person is providing no benefits for such organization.

    in reply to: The marriage trade #910045
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Something here reminds of a story.

    Some fellow dies and goes up to heaven. He sees there are two gates. One with a sign “henpecked husbands” and the other “not henpecked husbands”.

    He sees the line for henpecked husbands is unbelievably long. The other line has just one person there, lets call him ??? Lupowitz.

    The newly deceased person goes over ??? and says “Mr Lupowitz, you must be a very happy man, you are on this line”.

    ??? Lupowitz says back “sure, this is where my wife told me to stand”.

    in reply to: Ksuba question #910104
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Besalel,

    this comment of yours “As eidin zommimim” indicates your level of halachik knowledge. It is obvious to all that it extends in many directions.

    Eidim zomimim. Hah. Just looking for a good eidim.

    in reply to: VAS License Plates on a Non-Emergency Vehicle #1031329
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    There is a small measure of satisfaction when one makes an observation and it is shown to be completely accurate and spot on just a short while later.

    in reply to: Ipad mini – Artscroll #908623
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    The costs of digitizing and coding are borne by Artscroll. The Foundation only pays for specific items, there are a heck of a lot of other substantial costs involved in producing the Shas and other items in the series.

    The only reason that the price is as low as it is is because of the costs that are legally allowable to be borne by the Foundation.

    And from what I understand, they have this reviewed regulalrly to make sure they are in conformance with laws and regulations.

    I am sure that this is just one of many basic things you do not comprehend. The lack of comprehension is the issue, not the matter that you are not comprehending.

    in reply to: VAS License Plates on a Non-Emergency Vehicle #1031321
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    It seems someone is broigus that he was not considered by hatzola even though he is a self described expert. Shows me that hatzola certainly has standards. And probably qualifications in addition to just passing an emt course.

    All I know is that I see dedicated volunteers that give up of themselves continually and they have saved thousands of lives, all for no pay.

    That’s what I have seen with my eyes. What I have also seen are bitter illogical comments by posters who are the same.

    There may be things that are not perfect, but in my eyes they are a lot more perfect than you.

    in reply to: Finish the sentence, There's nothing like a good ______! #907343
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Line followed by an exclamation point.

    in reply to: New Seminary, by Popa #930249
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    1) Please send a list of students that you will not be accepting so we that it is appropriately exclusive.

    2) A list of how little kest parents have to promise, be cause these girls are so special

    3) How many applications and interviews you say you have erceived and conducted is important, make sure that checks got cashed.

    in reply to: correct pronunciation for the word r-a-t-i-o-n #906339
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Depends if you are using as a noun or verb.

    in reply to: Awkward Situation with Sensitive Information #907028
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Oldman,

    The question is what should someone do in a case where they are aware of such information, not specifically an ex.

    The real question is why is RebDoniel so aware of all the particulars with his ex. That seems unhealthy and stalkerish. It seems almost like he is transposing.

    in reply to: Awkward Situation with Sensitive Information #907027
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    @crisis,

    Ironic, no really, moronic. I am sure you would not call yourself heimish and yet you are doing just what you say the “heimishe oilam’ shouldn’t do.

    FYI, from the OP’s posts, it is pretty clear that he does not consider himself “heimish”.

    But you had to make your silly little remark. How wonderful of you.

    in reply to: Why do you think the Hurricane Sandy came? #906909
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Wolf,

    Bolding the words does not change that it was not the reason *why* HKB”H sent the hurricane, rather *how* he sent it.

    And I apologize about the kofer, to be accurate you said ” Am I a kofer, a ba’al ga’avah or a plain idiot”.

    Yes.

    in reply to: Why do you think the Hurricane Sandy came? #906905
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Wolf,

    Regardless as to why you may be a kofer, the little I know made his/ her statement regarding someone who said they have a definitive reason why the hurricane occurred, which you did not. You said how it happened, not why. It is left to you to explain why you are a kofer, which you seem to be asserting.

    in reply to: Why do you think the Hurricane Sandy came? #906904
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Less chumras,

    Do you believe there is a reason for either event?

    Do you believe that there is a message, regardless of who was or was not directly affected?

    in reply to: Why do you think the Hurricane Sandy came? #906895
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Wolf,

    Your response was *how* Hurricane Sandy happened, not *why*.

    You did not respond to the OP’s question.

    in reply to: Keeping tzitzit tucked in #902508
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Garters.

    in reply to: Why do you think the Hurricane Sandy came? #906865
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    Zdad,

    Do you really think it is because of an individual case? Or would it be more likely because of huge groups who think Torah is secondary?

    Since you are such a tzadik, why would you have been impacted by the two brothers in YU who arguing in court?

Viewing 50 posts - 1,451 through 1,500 (of 1,774 total)