Always_Ask_Questions

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 8,713 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Million Man March #2468239

    YYA> Did the Czar draft girls?

    It is probably my fault to go that far off-topic. you can look at Chofetz Chaim’s Mehane Yisroel, here are some quotes to illustrate how he
    related to Jewish soldiers. Hope we have rabbis now who speak this way to soliders, and soldiers who read this …

    true it is difficult for a person in service to observe torah. However, unless he has a feeble character,
    he will overcome his passions and conquer his evil inclinations, A real, earnest endeavor in this direction
    would make his deeds so more precious and his thoughts more sanctified. The period of his service in the army
    can be made by him the most outstanding one in his whole life, and the most valuable in his
    spiritual achievements. …

    wholesome family life is the basic element of Jewish national structure. ,.. vicious environment may cause man to go astray…
    associating with evil company may make him feel he is not alone when he engages in illicit activity
    engagement with other things, especially study or prayer, frequently will help man to regain and maintain his morals.

    faithful person does not break down under duress, soldier relying on Hashem will combat enemy .. to be mighty of heart and of soul
    is to live a great life. Soldier exposed to danger .. should pay attention to his behavior .. and fulfil mitzvos better as in danger, his
    deeds are examined in heaven …

    when one’s life is at stake, it is permitted to break mitzvos, but transgressions should be minimized
    from Gemora: in a Jewish army, only those who viewed themselves innocent could join. Transgressions may be – speaking between yishtabach and yotzer ohr… including forbidden speech .. soldier in the time of war should reconcile with other people, seek forgiveness from people he offended,
    develop chesed middos towards other people, every kindness he does towards his fellow soldiers … then, he describes all famous Jewish warriors and prayers a soldier should say before going to battle.

    in reply to: New book – “HaChareidim V’Haaretz” #2468142

    YYA, you describe a process of religious Jews in Israel becoming non-religious in the next generation.
    I am sure it looked very focused for those who lived in EY at the time. But I wonder whether this sociological process is part of what was happening everywhere in the early 20th century, with the world going mad with communist ideas – either parallel to what was happening with Jews in Europe or just part of that process with new arrivals bringing their non/anti-religious attitudes with them.

    Times often define the events, not specific movements. As Menashe says to R Ashi in a dream “if you were to live in my generation, you would be running after me [towards A’Z] picking up your suit ..”

    in reply to: New book – “HaChareidim V’Haaretz” #2468116

    YYA> Israel as a whole remained stuck in Socialist shackles for the first 30 years of its existence, until Menachem Begin came to power and broke the Labor monopoly

    I agree with the whole post.

    in reply to: New book – “HaChareidim V’Haaretz” #2468134

    R Schlesinger seems to be an interesting figure, indeed in between different worlds. On one hand, he was against secular education both in his native Hungary and in EY, on the other hand he wanted to reform haluka system that supported EY Jews that was not suitable to accommodate mass arrivals that he anticipated and was seemingly not just helping to found Petach Tikva but also sympathetic to some zionist ideas.

    Seemingly, our silly discussion is reflected in academic literature, To quote one paper: “considered by some scholars to be a forerunner of ultra-Orthodoxy, but by others as a forerunner of Zionism.” He is an interesting figure, and no less controversial than, say, R Kook, even as he did not necessarily leave many followers (where are all these charedi farmers now?). As his utopic peaceful world were to happen under the wise Ottoman Sultan, hard to say what he would say about charedi soldiers. See below some interesting quotes I found, hope they are yashar.

    It seems that R Schlesinger supported agricultural activities for those who are not suited for learning – first in Hungary, then in EY, but in religious setting. Women were not allowed to read external literature, go to theatre, attend simchos without separation and wearing wigs (duh).

    I am a little confused: in one place, he writes: You should only teach that [the secular subjects] which they must learn, and only by a non-Jew—this is a law that cannot be abrogated. In another (maybe in EY context), to the opposite, suggests learning professions in Hebrew.

    The society that he proposed had its own set of rules that differed from those of the kollel, the avant garde group that was designed to lead the society. The kollel had more stringent rules, and anyone who joined it was obligated to follow the behaviours characteristic of sects. These stringencies included immersion in the mikveh and carrying one’ s bed on his shoulders rather than in a horse-drawn wagon. he proposed organizing the people according to the biblical model including family units, banners, and 12 tribal units. Members of each tribe would wear uniform clothing and would speak only Hebrew. central leadership would include three religious leaders headed by a nasi, who would sit in Jerusalem, and would be governed by a supreme council consisting of representatives from each tribe and from the diaspora Jewish community. The council would work towards building a Jewish entity in Palestine that would be recognized by the ruling Ottoman Empire.

    Schlesinger’ s excommunication by the heads of the Ashkenazi community in Jerusalem was caused by a number of factors, including his criticism of the Hungarian kollel for not distributing money to new immigrants to Israel, his leniency vis-à-vis the ban of Rabbeinu Gershom, his pretentious messianism, and the halakhic rulings in his book Beit Yosef hahadash that were not supported by any Orthodox approbations .. We are excommunicating, ostraciz-
    ing, and prohibiting the book Beit Yosef hahadash with all types of bans and prohibitions … because it should be hidden and burned, just like all external books and the books of heretics. ” The ban was signed by Chief Rabbi of the Ottoman Empire R. Avraham Ashkenazi, the Chief Rabbi of the Ashkenazim R. Meir Auerbach … Schlesinger also got into an argument with the Hungarian kollel regarding the halukkah subsidies. He demanded that subsidies be given immediately for new immigrants to the Land of Israel, which was contrary to the kollel policy of not giving support from the kollel to new immigrants during the first two years. This policy was designed to prevent the new immigrants from taking advantage of the kollel at the expense of the members who were already in Israel and who were from the original phases of its organization. The leadership of the kollel prevented Schlesinger
    from receiving support and brought him to a state of abject poverty

    in reply to: Million Man March #2468083

    YYA> wise. When all three Moetzes, plus the Eidah, plus Rav Thau and a few RZ for good measure, all agree on THE CORE ISSUE, even if they disagree on political details etc., so you have a VERY SOLID CONSENSUS of Torah leaders. Don’t tell me stories about deceased Gedolei Yisroel from decades ago. Tell me why you feel entitled to disagree with ALL the above Gedolei Yisroel.

    You are provoking me to list RZ and MO rabbis who disagree. I don’t want to go and start studying these machlokets in depth and get into shouting match. I just quoted in another thread – I asked a couple of serious rabbonim in person and they both sounded very conflicted. Could you make a similar effort and ask in private some of the non-extreme rabbis that I think you have access to, and elicit their balanced opinion that you can then quote without attribution.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2468076

    yankel> Its not a cute proof at all …
    > its a gross distortion and no proof whatsoever …

    yankel, I am disappointed that you repeatedly non-respond to me. “this is not a proof” is NOT an acceptable response to a logical supposition. If you disagree, gezunte heig, let us know what your logic is. Simple name-calling might work when you talk to your close friends, but it is not bringing any clarity to an online argument with people you do not know. Try harder.

    in reply to: Capitalism, Socialism, and the New York Election #2468073

    Muslim communists seems to be the new “wide tent”. They unite in the hate of Israel and US. I am not sure how long they can state together, without Muslims throwing commmies off the building, and with commies accepting opium of the masses in addition to the usual drugs they use.

    in reply to: Write in votes #2468070

    I write in votes all the times when there is no acceptable candidate. If they were to give my votes the weight they deserve, Nixon would have won the 3rd term.

    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2468069

    YYA, NP,
    I think you are both right – Steipler both gently refuses their calls, and as gently but firmly says that misuse of Torah is forbidden.

    in reply to: Time to make the popcorn #2468068

    some people do not like my reading of the sources, so let’s go with references only:
    Deut 16:18
    Brochos 55a
    Yer AZ 16a
    Pirkei Avos 3:2
    CM 163:1
    Midrash Tanhuma, Mishpatim 2:1
    Rosh Responsa, 6:10
    R Hirsh 19 letters 16:4
    Darash Moshe, Vol. I, p. 415 (1939)
    Rav Moshe Feinstein Letter, October 3, 1984
    Chazon Ish to an Yid who did not vote because he did not pay the poll tax: go and sell your pair of tefillin and use the funds to pay the poll tax so that you can go and vote

    in reply to: Time to make the popcorn #2468024

    > Democracy is not a Jewish concept

    Well, majority of the CR posters endorse this – ergo …

    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2468022

    yankel> should they enlist with the sakana to their entire yahdut over their heads ?

    simple action plan that you can work out i a month:
    – form a cybersecurity unit from the computer-educated charedim
    – pass army tests or equivalent
    – propose to the army to deploy you as a unit
    – bonus: include farsi-speaking sefardi charedim
    – extra bonus: perform some action against sonei yisroel on your own to demonstrate your capabilities. There are plenty of hackers who do that.

    in reply to: Time to make the popcorn #2468023

    YYA> according to the letter of the law, there are 55,000 bochurim who are supposed to be arrested

    nothing to be proud of. There are millions of people who cheat on taxes or in business, or break immigration, driving and parking regulations. Police arrests enough of them or give them tickets to keep the problem limited.

    If you ask me – I would give them a Torah test and start from the ones who fail the test.
    Those standing on the building during demonstration get two points off – risking their life and trespassing private property.
    Those on top of the gas station – 3 points off. + Endangering others via a possible explosion.
    If they were smoking – one more point off.

    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2468020

    In a smaller universe – a shul, a family – when people start arguing who gives more and who gets more, it is not a good sign. And usually a waste of air – I am cooking the dinners! I am taking the garbage out!

    If you want to look at “support”, you need to count everything. Not just the funds for yeshiva, but also for the military, and for economic development, and for child subsidies. I don’t think you can count spiritual impact on the other side of the ledger. This would be an equivalent of forcing on non-religious, or even non-charedi, Jews an Issachar/Zevulun contract. Forced contract is invalid. Note that on general majority of Israelis are reasonably sympathetic to charedi needs – judging by the political decisions of providing various sources of support. This could not have happened just based on knesset-level coalition blackmail, this reflects values of Israeli citizens. It seems though, that the army issue crosses the line – this is not just about money, but about “my blood is redder than yours” attitude. Yes, not just the draft issue itself, but the attitude charedim are showing when discussing this. I hope you can see the problem.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2468011

    NP> This is true even if there would be a small number of very competent engineers who disagree.

    This is a legit question. I understand that when we lack a Sanhedrin, we are not obligated to follow the majority. In this case, I and many others decided to follow a shita different from you. Hopefully, we did it with intellectual integrity, not just because we enjoy kulos of a particular school. [the difference between me and others with same shitah is that many others do not bother to have discussions on YWN, and enjoy talking between each other. I am just happened to be a person who likes to hear from different sides directly].

    Note also gemora avoda zara that explains the difference between sakanah and tumah. In your case of sakanah, you might need to follow majority. In many cases, you may want to follow the most conservative engineer. How well rabbis understood these halochos was revealed during first days of Covid. Not counting rabbis who ignored it, there were several outstanding teshuvos that I heard that demonstrate how a Talmid Chochom can apply his learning to a urgent and novel issue. Here is my short list. Maybe you have other:

    R Henneman: when it was forbidden to gather in the same yard, he did not allow minyanim that consist of people in nearby yards which would be legal. Not because they do not form a minyan, but because of moris ayn – a passerby may not appreciate the minute detail, conclude that Jews violate the order, and then an Yid in the ER will not be given a ventilator.

    R Mayer Twersky: Rambam says to consult a doctor and follow his instructions. Many Rabbonim followed this to a letter. Some invited frum or Jewish doctors or epidemiologists to consult. R Twersky noted that due to a high uncertainty, several doctors need to be consulted and the most conservative opinion should be followed. This is right from the book on robust statistics!

    R Willig: on a question whether camps should refund tuition: Do your best right now. We are busy with dinei nefoshos, we will deal with dinei mamonos after the emergency.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2468005

    NP > The fact that there is such a vast disagreement among Gedolim on a number of substantial related issues makes it all the more compelling when they agree regarding the point under discussion.

    I am glad that we agreed on the first part. I just disagree on the second – that everyone know agrees. As I mentioned, I feel more comfortable to reason about past issues first as we understand them a little better before jumping into great unknowns of today. On past similar issues, R Soloveitchik seemed to disagree with many rabonim of his time on the issues of relations to the world, including some of the issues of army service. In my mind, current issues is similar to previous ones, but I am open to the arguments.

    I already got one push back: I talked with one of the RJBS great students (I would not call him a “follower” as he is his own Rav) and he is as unsure as some of us are here. He says it is a legitimate issue in halakha that Talmidei Chachamim might be exempt from the Army. When I tried to clarify to whom it applies as not everyone is, he did not reject that but did want to discuss this aspect further. I think that means that he is moved by seeing so many religious Jews coming out together (and getting reports from people who enjoyed the meeting) that he finds it hard to argue against it even when it should be. I asked privately another Rov, whom I do not know well, who lives in two worlds – being both a very charedi and doing kiruv in somewhat “modern” environments. He praised the beauty and unit of the demonstration. When I asked him, with some reserve, whether he had any concerns – his face became red and he said “this is a discussion for another time”. I gave him a slightly funny look, and he added, unprompted “we can’t fully understand politics of another country”. After another funny look, he rushed into another excuse … So, here a person with more charedi bias seems also somewhat confused. So, here are my best attempts at collecting rabbinical responsa. I hope others can find someone they can ask and receive honest answers.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2468003

    YYA> The Gedolei Hador know all the Chazals that you quote,

    we are mixing up themes here – another poster did not like my posts, I’ve never get any complaints from the gedolim about my posts (unless one of them is posting here anonymously to enjoy an honest back-and-forth with yungelite without flattery, and I doubt that).

    IRL, I might have said something out-of-line in front of some Rabonim and they either (unexpectedly) agreed or laughed with me or expressed disagreement. Did not call me “naive” or “sofek mezid” though. The worst was probably when I tried jokingly flatter R Steinsaltz with an obscure literary reference and my tongue worked faster than my brain and it turned out an insulting reference. He understood what I said faster than I did and laughed whole-heartedly. I have only one excuse – he made a pun on my name earlier on 🙂

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2467544

    and, yes, please can we move to other threads

    in reply to: Time to make the popcorn #2467545

    this is “nullification of democracy” when both sides reject the others as legitimate. This is not a good siman.

    I don’t want to waste time psychoanalyzing AG, I am sure there are better places to do that. I am worrying on our side. Maybe now when “the state” took down a couple of people you don’t like an who might be corrupt – could you in return ask people to stop saying “arrested for learning Torah”? I am not asking going whole way to facts, maybe something in between – a learner arrested for not responding to a notice to appear while following rosh yeshiva’s instructions and while visiting parents.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2467543

    yankel> he regularly distorts hazal and disforms their message by adding his own ‘sevarot keres’

    translating back into yinglish: he quotes chazal that sometimes my teachers did not; and I disagree with his logic emotionally and I am looking for the logical argument to present.

    in reply to: New book – “HaChareidim V’Haaretz” #2467506

    YYA, sounds like an interesting book. I think it says similar things to what many posters are saying here: that there were religious people who participated in the settlement. If you don’t want to call them religious zionists, but call them haredim who arrived to dig wells, shoin.

    > 8. The secular settlements were dependent on financial support from Jews abroad, no less than the “Old Yishuv” was. (The Kibbutz Movement was never a financial success story

    Indeed. According to research I saw – when Sochnut centralized donor funds and re-directed them to kbibutzim in 1920-30s, this decreased development of manufacturing in Tel Aviv area [kibutzim were losing money, while manufacturing was profitable], leading to less German Jews deciding to come until it was too late. To be totally fair, acquisition of land enabled creating the state and provide physical protection beyond “city states” of Yerushalaim and Tel-Aviv.

    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2467503

    Well, maybe it was a get.

    Steipler writes in a nice tone trying to find common ground, but he is clearly indicating that there is a problem here.
    Maybe not yet a get, just warning a sotah.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2467502

    YYA> If ALL the Gedolim agree wall to wall on something

    I have a cute “mathematical” proof here.

    Axiom: when all gedolim of one generation gather on one street of Yerushalaim and daven together, Moschiach will come [anybody knows the gemora page? It might be in Sanhedrin. I heard it from R Steinsaltz where he explained it tongue-in-cheek: we do not understand this gemora right – it is only when Moschiach comes, all gedolim will gather together …]

    Fact “all gedolim” according to you gathered together. Moschiach seemingly did not come. Ergo, not all gedolim came.
    QED

    Another possible explanation – they gathered, but did not daven together. I am told that they decided to have tehilim instead of speeches, because there was no one agreed speech, as groups vary widely in the political terms.

    PS One of my kids was asked to “daven to support gedolim” and say tehilim at the time of the march. Most kids were clueless what this was about, my kid was not brave enough/did not think it is appropriate to leave the room. Instead, he said tehilim for the refuah shleimah of hostages. Tehilim unite us …

    in reply to: Million Man March #2467500

    YYA> safety of their own soldiers more than they cared about their enemy’s civilians,

    you are lacking imagination. Russian army cares about achieving the military goal. Period. In the end of WW2, leading soviet general spent million+ soldiers to be first in Berlin – ahead of Americans and ahead of competing soviet general. You really need to know how the world operates to be realistic in your evaluation of IDF.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2467498

    YYA> If ALL the Gedolim

    a true scotsman argument. The closer it is to our times, the harder it is to judge. So, I was looking as far as we can when the “modern” issues were already discussed. This is what often discuss here – first half of 20th century. I find the argument that R Kook, R Soloveichik, Lubavitcher Rebbe are as much talmidei chachomim as others of that generation. There is also enough evidence that at least some of more universally recognized talmidei chachomim, like R Feinstein, recognized the above. We had discussions here. I think we agree on this.

    If they all were to sit in a Sanhedrin, they might be bound by rules of majority. Whatever the sins of our generations are, we do not have such a body. Thus, any of these T’Ch are a legitimate opinion. It is, of course, very tempting to fake “daas Torah” and simply follow a gadol that corresponds to your liking or who supports whatever you are doing. It is a difficult question for everyone. Some people are more self-aware than others in this …

    For me, personally, I always suspected that I have a “modernishe” bias. For that reason, I was trying to learn only classical sources, not seriously learning any modernishe seforim, although I heard some of the shitos, of course. I started reading R Soloveitchik in depth relatively recently and found that many conclusions I came to are similar or parallel to his. This is not a proof that I am not biased, just a proof that I worked on my bias.

    in reply to: 770: A Mikdash or a Madhouse? Rabbonim Must Act Now #2467490

    So, there is a tzadik and then there are people violating halocha and other norms. I hope nobody thinks that if X is a Tzadik and Y claims to belong to the same group as X, then he is also a tzadik.

    in reply to: The Steipler Gaon on Zionism and on the Neteurei Karta #2467066

    whoever brought up the letter, should pony up the date. Otherwise, it is posul like a get without a date.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2467065

    YYA> Gedolei Yisroel care about everyone more than you and I do. That doesn’t stop them from taking the course they are taking now.

    Look, from studying these issues, it is clear that there are multiple legitimate views, and multiple communities that had different legitimate attitudes. I think you agree with this. I can’t tell who is right (and most likely each group is sometimes right, or all are right for certain people, under certain conditions).

    But I know for sure who is not right – those who (on either side) claim that their position is Torah Moshe l’Sinai and the opposite are apikoresim. I am afraid this camp is pretty large.

    A recent anecdote – I attended recently several lectures by an inspiration and very cheerful speaker. I noticed that his speech was very charedi when listeners were mostly charedim, but when the listeners were less insular, he would show his feelings towards IDF and other non-charedi things. I was not sure where he actually stands until this: he made an interesting drush, and I came up to him after, thanked for an interesting idea and suggested an idea from R Soloveitchik that has an implication that supports his drush. He suddenly stopped his cheerful smile and replied “I had older sources” and turned away. So much for love of Toirah.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2467064

    YYA > . By the way, the Russian Army back then believed in Hashem in some form, prioritized the safety of their own soldiers before that of enemy civilians, and did not draft girls…

    OK, OK, even as you are going overboard with Russian army caring of soldier safety … Just wanted to bring a story: I was reading a sefer that made a following point: “if the Czar would really understand the value of Torah learning, he would put a soldier with a bayonet near every learning Yid”. Here, I was turning a page and guessing that it continues “and when antisemites would come, the soldier would defend the Yid”. To my surprise, the next page said: “and when a Yid would distract from learning, the soldier will stab him with the bayonet”. That is, we are the problem, not the anti-semites. .. So, maybe time for the bayonets in yeshovos.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2467062

    YYA> this is about “integrating the Chareidim into Israeli society” = OTD shmad = ייהרג ואל יעבור. If and when this will really be about the operational needs of the IDF, the brass will have to choose between secular/progressive ideology and operational needs, they can’t have both.

    as I answered before, I understand your reservations. I am simply proposing that you [as a community] acknowledge that you are citizens of the country and continue hammering at realistic conditions that you need to join. What stops you from organizing units engaged in activities that are reasonably kosher – cyber-security, for example or tank drivers. Get a group of students prepared and offer coming to IDF as a unit. If they refuse, unless you allow yichud in a tank – then shoin.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2467061

    anonymous> RJBS was never a member of the Moetzes.

    you seem to be a devote follower of aguda but never bothered to check who was in it?
    See https://agudah.org/moetzes-gedolei-hatorah
    Note the webpage title GEDOLEI-HATORAH

    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2467060

    In Tannis, there is a discussion why our generation learns more – even Uktzin, but do not deserve miracles as previous ones… Learning is not the only thing we are judged on.

    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2467059

    I am not sure where this discussion going. I don’t think serving is something to consider for middos development. We don’t create nisayanos for ourselves to practice. You live in a country that is in the situation where it needs an army. So, it is a necessity. There is a legit idea that talmidei chachomim do not serve.

    How does this work in a democratic state where half of population disagrees, I don’t know. I see how people can disagree here. There is a gemorah in bava basra where amei haaretz wanted T’Ch to share tax burden and threatened to leave, and left – and the tax was rescinded. Gemorah does not seem to say what would happen without the miracle. I presume talmidei chachomim would have paid. So, move away from Tzahal protection and see if you deserve a miracle.

    But this relates to talmidei chachamim ™. Not everyone else who is hanging around them.

    Not sure if this is relevant, but something to think about: in Shevuos, I think, there is a discussion: you should buy hard-to-check items (blue color for tzitzes, maybe used cars) from a talmid chacham whose integrity you can trust. Then, the question is – would you trust his household – wife/child/servant. And the answer seems to be – you presume that they learned integrity from the T’Ch but when you see something suspicious once, the presumption is off. So, we hope that integrity rubs off, but it is not guaranteed that if you hang out around T’Ch, you’ll have same middos.

    in reply to: Going OTD in the IDF #2467008

    why are we guessing here. We live in the time when actual information is available. Can someone – on either side – either bring a citation, or ask your local yeshiva about fate of their gradutes?

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2467007

    yankel, your attack on my “naivete” – do you have a point? What you see as “naive” is mu humble attempt to argue an issue from the first principles – what is it about, instead of starting with stereotypes and slogans from any of the groups. It is a well-regarded approach, practiced by Avraham (Rambam’s version) and Socrates. If you would like to have your objections, gezunte heig – and you often do – byt simply ranting at me because I am not using cliches dear to your ear is silly and unbecoming.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2467006

    somiejew > The zionists came and forced their rule over the population of Palestine. now, you want us to leave because we don’t want your government?

    Is this your version of history? Jewish population in 1880s was 25,000. They were supported financially by Yidden around the world.
    Most modern charedim came at the same time as other Jews and have as much claim to the country.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2466497

    yankel> the intent of the left wing crooks who sit on the plum chairs in the court rooms and legal offices is simple

    you are making it into a battle against left-wing. Look at the core problem. See discussion between Hashem and Yona about the kikayon – a simple example that Hashem cares about all humans and life… Charedim are citizens of Medinat Yisrael with an elected government where they are represented. The country has laws, elected officials. It has legitimate defence needs that are often fulfilled by something close to an open nes. You can vote and then follow the laws. If laws present challenges – you deal with them. We lived thru Persian empire, Roman empire, hoily roman empire, russian empire … we did not rebel because we were put in ghettoes, we deal with that and tried to influence the decision makers when possible. We did not cry to Hashem – we can’t learn Torah because Russian Czar is not providing us with childcare. Mittele Rebbe was learning while sitting with a baby (and got reprimanded by his father Alter Rebbe for not paying attention to the baby crying).

    in reply to: Million Man March #2466470

    besalel> The problem is that the High Court and AG stand in the way of the democratic process. in other words it is not legislation from the anti-torah camp that needs to be blocked. it supra-democratic bodies that are suppressing and quashing the will of the people.

    We had this discussion recently. Modern democracies have a lot of features that make the system more stable than a lot of agitated citizens deciding by raw vote whether to go to a war or hang the other side. Read up on american system, for example. So, having parts of the system that slow down political process, that require a vast majority people to agree to change fundamentals is not “undemocratic”. It does not mean that you or I agree with everything these bodies do, or that the system does not require corrections that we can advocate for. Just, don’t call them nasty names because it will quickly escalate from there – on both sides.

    > most israelis know what the solution is: allow anyone who wants to learn to learn and draft all charedim who are not learning. while many chareidi leaders will not say it out loud (perhaps in order to gain leverage), they all secretly agree that this is the solution.

    You may be right. But at some point, leaders need to address reality and also address their followers who get carried away with idealistic visions. We read stories when elderly gedolim were allegedly mislead or shielded from information by a small number of people surrounding them. Imagine being surrounded by 1000s of “chasidim” who were hearing that they are am segulah and are entitled to behave any way they want and curse anyone who disagree with them – how do you talk to them about a reasonable compromise, without destroying their whole weltanschauung.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2466468

    YYA > and start a new Moetzes

    Thanks for the suggestions. That is exactly what R Soloveitchik had to do – he was in the early Moetzes and then quit to start different organizations.

    Look at this debate – it is enough for one minor event (demonstration) lead to people putting away niceties and start putting statements saying that the other side is against the Torah. If you wait until your emotions subside – we seemingly had a lot of discussions to understand arguments on both sides, some valid, some not. If we are not able to continue this discussion based on one demonstration, this is not a good sign.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2466384

    somejew > we want them to go away and leave us alone!
    simply move outside of IDF-controlled area – to surya or mitzrayim. I suggested this before, but now it is even possible to survive under new Surian government. Why do people who do not like the government and the army insist on living under their protection?

    yankel> AAQ is persisting in his naivete …..
    I noticed you repeat this sentence as if this can really convince me. You can do better, you often bring good arguments. Just presume that I have access to the library of alexandria and the whole internet, so not so naive, and answer on topic.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2466287

    mycommentsforfree> doesn’t know of what Torah and Mitzvos mean
    .
    sadly, some participants (a minority, but quite a number of them including not just those sitting on the unfinished building but those on an explosive petrol station and on the road sign towards Mt Herzl beit kvurot) – did not learn chumash up to the mitzva of protecting the roof. They definitely should stay in yeshiva until they learn that, they are not ready for the tzahal, danger to others.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2465733

    Agudah invited me to say tehilim, but did not say which tehilim?

    which tehilim are recommended for refusing to fight the enemies?
    which ones are for asking to topple the government that was successful in destroying the enemies from all sides and for getting the new government lead by anti-religious parties?
    I am not such an expert on tehilim or nach in general, they were only teaching gemorah in my yeshiva, so I could not find such.

    Also, which tehilim should be said by those who do not agree with the event – for shalom al israel and for prevention of hillul Hashem?

    For chilonim – while all bnei yeshvos are practicing marching and rechov Yerushalaim are jammed, there is a tremendous opportunity, shaarei Toireh are wide open – go learn a bissele gemorah to have your prayers answered.

    in reply to: Prospective giores looking for connections #2465612

    common, tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt

    in reply to: Million Man March #2465610

    I do believe anecdotal observations of danger of the army, but I would like to see a statistically valid argument: what is the rate of OTD or other problems of those charedim or near-charedim who go to the army and how do they compare with similar population that did not go. It is up to those who look for exemptions to show this data. If there is nothing published yet, could someone ask their rosh yeshiva for some supporting documentation.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2465574

    YYA> IDF doesn’t take the Chareidim seriously,

    Then, work on being taken seriously instead of working so hard to alienated all other groups of Jews . Articulate conditions under which some of the community will do something for the country and continue discussing those conditions. You have enough politicians to do that.

    in reply to: after hostages freed #2465573

    YYA> The hishtadlus just doesn’t work. At best all it does is buy some more time

    I don’t know where these attitudes come from. Is it what Zionists call “galut mentality” – when we had no agency in how goyim decided to deal with us?
    Tanach and Gemorah are full of examples of people doing what they can do – and doing it in an erliche way … I understand this is all said and done in defence of Torah, but you can’t defend Torah by diverting our tradition into some cultish behavior. There is no contradiction between developing Iron dome and being a Torah Yid, whatever the history of israeli politics was in last 80 years.

    in reply to: Million Man March #2465569

    Aguda sent me this: … in protest of the harassment and shocking imprisonment of lomdei Torah in Eretz Yisroel .. for the protection of lomdei Torah, and for the honor of Torah to be uplifted throughout the world.

    What do I do if I think that protecting the honor of the Torah requires admitting that imprisonment of those who are not responding to army letters is not really “shocking”. And if you think that it is “shocking”, then why did you set up students for this by advising them not to respond in the first place?

    I don’t think all complicated terutzim answer simcha’s point: communities that don’t feel they need to do anything for the threat from the enemies, suddenly march to protect themselves from fulfilling their civil duty. As YYA seems to admit, the language is “elevated” – “Torah” means “Yiddishkeit” and even those who don’t speak this “loshon” will use it here. Similarly, “gilui arayot” does not mean sleeping with your sister, but to the horror of being exposed to non-religious girls in the same Army unit … just request only unmarried girls in the unit …

    I think we understand the fears of the community, but you should also understand that the self-serving cries of Torah using non-truthful loshon is not answering the questions people have.

    in reply to: after hostages freed #2464684

    YYA> It is worth noting that the Arab mindset in general sees these things from a long-term perspective in terms of the overall situation as opposed to ‘specific actions’,

    I agree with this and the rest you posted. Americans specifically are bad at this long game. But in this case, the possible move towards reforming Pali governing is a hopeful strategic move.

    > Item 5 was also present all along,

    sure. That just support my point – Israel did not give any ground in the negotiations. What happened seems like the best among practically possible alternatives. Maybe your pessimism is due to the overall situation, not the latest events. Still, I think we should all as much as possible stick together instead of breaking up in small groups, each demanding their own vision to be fulfilled, and all together blaming the leaders who are trying to deal with the events.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2464683

    YYA > hat if and when there will be a genuine operational need for Chareidim, for practical reasons, not for ideological reasons, then the IDF brass will have no choice but to sincerely engage with the Chareidim on terms acceptable to a majority of Gedolei Yisroel.

    the best way to make army really need charedim is to develop desirable skills. For example, cyber or EW skills.

    in reply to: The Fourth Reich of “Israel” #2464682

    YYA,> It’s just that the Chareidim can’t say out loud that they won’t serve altogether, and the Left can’t say out loud that they want to make Chareidim go OTD, so both sides use code words and dog whistles.

    I am really skeptical about assigning intentions, especially nefarious, to groups of people. I am sure some are. But I presume that most people on the left (and center, and some on the right) feel charedi position is unfair and insulting to them. If they feel desire of making potential recruits “less charedi” probably means that they would like those charedim to be friendlier towards the rest of am yisroel.

    And we discussed your complaints already. My suggestion is – be mentchen, develop a positive agenda and propose your own conditions instead of demonstrating against.

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 8,713 total)