Always_Ask_Questions

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 4,051 through 4,100 (of 8,954 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Should all Yidden know Hebrew? #2144112

    A report of one Sephardi school in their native country:
    classes every day (including Shabbat when the only change was not writing)
    main focus – mikra, not tosfos.
    A person who was in such school until 12 y.o. in his later years was quoting Tanach by heart. That is, if someone starts saying a pasuk from anywhere, he would be able to finish it.

    in reply to: latest shidduch data #2144111

    interesting. could you also collect ages of both, numbers over time, year of marriage (so that we can compare different years), and similar numbers for boys.

    in reply to: Cherem on sefer “Pshuto Shel Mikra” #2144106

    RebE,
    thanks for the reference! Note that the author is niftar 6 years ago. The English sefer is a translation by a student of the original 2009 sefer. So, unless there are fault by the translators, someone is now attacking a Talmid Chacham who is not able to answer ..

    I can only add here a minor personal edut. I know some members of the extended family and they are big baalei chesed and ehriche people, making a difference in lives of many people, some of whom I know personally.

    in reply to: Cherem on sefer “Pshuto Shel Mikra” #2144103

    Avira > if chazal were around today, they would institute a bracha “shelo asani moderni”

    So, do you think Rambam would change some of his scientific and medical writing based on current information? Would he update, say, his recommendations on how long to sleep with an iPhone app recommendations? And if yes, what sources will he use? Would he go to yeshiva students who learned his old seforim (and then sometimes overrule him with later sources), or will he go to the physicists, psychologists, economists who else know what the halakha requires (say Dr Schroeder, R Twersky, R Aumann) …

    Do you think amoraim who discuss all kind of medical and nutrition recommendations will look at what modern dietologists are saying? I am not saying that they’ll go to college to get degrees. Maybe they’ll simply learn English, public health, statistics. Maybe they will ask someone in Lakewood to translate “Nature” into Aramaic …

    in reply to: Cherem on sefer “Pshuto Shel Mikra” #2143830

    Btw, could you find the name of that banned book in my previous post?

    in reply to: Tal Umotor Reminder #2143816

    I never knew that summer is longer than winter! (in northern hemisphere). one more thing to thank Hashem for.

    in reply to: Cherem on sefer “Pshuto Shel Mikra” #2143813

    Who is asking my opinion? I did not read the book, thus
    Making it difficult for me to comment. Although, out
    Of the curiosity, looks like I would need to buy this one.
    Gadol is asking whether we can rely on the names.

    I know at least one example of a very decent book written by a reputable Rav that was banned for an inexplicable (for me) reason. I am glad I was able to read it.

    Thanks to jackk for translating the letter. It is understandably generic. I wonder whether you guys can find a specific example and explain what is wrong there. Otherwise, everyone is talking to their prejudices.

    in reply to: Should all Yidden know Hebrew? #2143809

    Avira, nice town. Might be your great-grandparents were in wood business, sending it by the river.

    This is close to an area where some of the Vilno Rabonim, like R Grozdinski will go for the summer, so they might have stopped by them.

    Wiki and others list 3 shuls, schools of multiple derachim, including Zionist, all for 2000 Yidden. So, it was indeed a heterogeneous community. several photos shows one picture of girls in berets, the rest look like not-so-observant

    in reply to: Should all Yidden know Hebrew? #2143502

    They may have had education (some of them), but they did not live in the western world, surrounded by opportunities that required leaving Judaism.

    in reply to: Boycotting Companies #2143475

    Congrats to everyone from that flight. Sounds like a good reason to travel them again.

    I saw an article about some entertainment person decided to ditch a “nazi”-owned Tesla and got … a VW instead.

    in reply to: Does Hashem Want Us to Survive? #2143474

    RebE > Maybe they are taught to look down, so they don’t see the person to tell one good morning.

    interesting, this contradicts the idea of greeting people first. How do you indeed greet people first while looking down?! Unless, both are looking down, and you greet him right before bumping into him.

    in reply to: 2024 predictions #2143476

    Note that while R Yohanan “predicts” Vespasian’s election, he is also does not know how much to ask, decides to ask less, and does not know whether he made a mistake until his death… Maybe his greeting was a combination of knowledge of Roman politics and also a desperate need to flatter the general. If he does know how V will react to an ask, he also does not know whether V will punish him for the wrong title, but increases the chance of making V look favorable at his request.

    in reply to: Should all Yidden know Hebrew? #2143473

    Avira, I am not arguing w/ Chazon Ish – when sephardim got exposed to modernity quite suddenly when moving out of their countries, they needed to use the tools that, lucky for them, ashkenazim developed over last several centuries.

    Ashkenazim did not learn in yeshivos until modernity. They learned locally and yehidim would travel to teachers in other places. Vilno was a place of a lot of learning, of course. Would be interested to hear what you are reading in the pinkasim.

    in reply to: Is a Kashrus Agency the Moral Police? #2143471

    We did not always knew the source. In fact, we have halochos of demai – sofek that am haaretz who is generally keeps kosher actually tithed the produce. Of course, maaser can be fixed, not everything can.

    in reply to: Does Hashem Want Us to Survive? #2143158

    moishek > and yet rarely so much as say good morning. And they are so so so frum.

    why are you calling such a person “frum”?

    in reply to: Is a Kashrus Agency the Moral Police? #2143159

    Avira, thanks for the clarification. What is the situation in a small community (it could be a large city, but a small community within it). If I know the owner personally, he is given kibudim in shul, etc – can I eat in his restaurant? How did people buy food from someone else before hashgohos?

    in reply to: Is a Kashrus Agency the Moral Police? #2143111

    Agency relies on the owner?! Thank you very much, I can rely on the owner myself, why do I need an agency for that?! The agency, I think, is supposed to provide independent assessment.

    Interesting question about geneiva. Yes, such a person can testify about kashrus – but would this only apply to someone else? If it is his own business, then he has monetary interest and that is why we have an agency to begin with. So, not sure this would work.

    In general, our generation is more careful about kashrus than geneiva, so we need to be more careful and check our biases. I already recounted here a story about a visiting speaker who went thru lots of business halochos: very machmir on kashrus and yichud, and very meikel on very basic geneiva where there is no need to be meikel (can you double bill your clients for a trip? not really, but sometimes …). I was embarrassed to ask about this difference publicly given enthusiasm of all listeners and was relived when Rosh Kollel picked up on this and started shouting – geneiva! geneiva! I asked the speaker later in private and he explained that he is strict on problems that sometimes lead to family breakups, but wants to let yidden have it easier when things are not that serious …

    so, ironically, I presume if you find pork in the store somewhere in the corner, it will lose certification because of a hashash; but if you find wrong weights – isur in the Torah – he may not!?

    in reply to: Does Hashem Want Us to Survive? #2143109

    a technical question – if Gra argues with Rishonim, can other Acharonim argue with Gra? That is, is he completely at the Rishonim level, or is he in both groups.

    in reply to: Should all Yidden know Hebrew? #2143108

    Sephardim did not have the Ashkenazi system because they did not (yet) encounter haskala and threat of assimilation. They lives, like Ashkenazim lived before haskala, in communities that consisted of both learned and not-so-learned Jews, without separating in different groups (in the same place). They benefited from what Ashkenazim built when they came to Israel and to US, but you should not use this as a sign of inferiority. It is like a handicapped person who got crutches thinking that he is superior to the guy who walks with his own feet.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2143080

    > When the OP called for accountability for those who committed mesira, expelled, bullied,

    I am not sure what common sees as offense. He seems to include me using the word “mazik” as “name calling”, while I am simply referring to the damage he makes (subject to an argument of course). I thought he will give me credit for using objective words in stead of saying [list omitted on my own, without editor’s he;lp :)].

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2143079

    common, I am not sure how I twisted your words. I understood you saying that you would not accommodate someone requests that you think are not reasonable and are not convenient to you. For me, it contradicts all kind of halochos and agadta how we need to help people even if they are not, from our point of view, reasonable.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142752

    the two numbers there were
    COVID-19 Deaths per 100,000
    Age-Adjusted COVID-19 Deaths per 100,000

    Grace Ratley April 2022 blog computes univariate linear regressions of state death rates to several factors. not very sophisticated analysis, but gives some idea what the factors are: vaccination rate seems to be the highest, stringency index less so, but still an issue. The index accounts for declared policies, not for actual behaviors.

    vaccination rates have R2=0.4 (i.e. explain 40% of variation between states)
    stringency index (rules, not compliance) explains 18% of the variation, so this gives you some idea

    on the negative side
    stringency index correlates explains 4% of adult depressions and 2% of suicides – not much.
    and 28% of unemployment

    interestingly, obesity statistics affects death rates more than individual risk, as obesity seem to be correlated to low vaccination rates and possibly other factors. That is, there is a certain lifestyle that includes obesity, low vaccination, poverty, Trump vote in 2020, maybe not mask wearing, etc

    interestingly, when adjusted for obesity and vax status, Trump vote did not correlate with death rates any more.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142749

    common, not sure what your perception of states is coming from. Here are numbers up to April 2022
    Texas is n4, Georgia 15, florida 31 … the highest of the stringent places are, I think NY and NJ 18-19 that had lots of early casualties.
    1 Mississippi 465 476
    2 Oklahoma 426 435
    3 Tennessee 404 409
    4 Texas 340 406
    5 Kentucky 400 404
    6 Alabama 410 403
    7 Nevada 374 396
    8 Arkansas 387 376
    8 Indiana 368 376
    8 New Mexico 390 376
    11 Louisiana 356 371
    12 North Dakota 380 370
    13 Arizona 388 369
    13 Ohio 388 369
    15 Georgia 319 364
    15 West Virginia 415 364
    17 South Carolina 371 362
    18 New York 381 361
    19 New Jersey 373 360
    20 District of Columbia 295 349
    21 South Dakota 361 341
    22 Missouri 350 335
    23 Pennsylvania 378 332
    24 Michigan 337 322
    25 Rhode Island 355 317
    26 Montana 344 316
    27 Kansas 319 313
    28 Idaho 292 309
    29 North Carolina 294 299
    30 Wyoming 293 294
    31 Florida 349 292
    32 Iowa 319 291
    33 Delaware 317 289
    34 Connecticut 321 287
    35 Illinois 283 283
    36 Colorado 243 277
    36 Maryland 270 277
    38 California 254 270
    39 Nebraska 268 264
    40 Massachusetts 278 262
    41 Virginia 244 255
    42 Wisconsin 265 252
    43 Alaska 187 244
    44 Minnesota 240 236
    45 Utah 169 225
    46 Washington 174 184
    47 Oregon 189 183
    48 New Hampshire 194 179
    49 Maine 201 168
    50 Puerto Rico 156 135
    51 Hawaii 116 103
    51 Vermont 118 103

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142745

    Syag, I just quoted 2nd half of his sentence, highlighting the motivation that he freely admits. I don’t think I am changing the meaning.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142728

    ” that makes me uncomfortable just to make someone suffering from [whatever] happy?”

    thanks for the honest explanation.

    in reply to: Is a Kashrus Agency the Moral Police? #2142710

    if people know what the heksher stands for, I see no problem them having their own standards. This is like that baker and a cake that went to Supreme Court. As long as it is possible to get a different heksher.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142682

    Common,again, a mazik is not an insult, it is an estimate of your causing nezek. Thanks for your explaining your position though. This is interesting. I don’t think we should engage, again, in a science debate. If you prefer listening to political blogs who are misinterpreting statistics, it is up to you. Trying to find common ground here: so, there are masses of people who are convinced that (proper) masking saves lives. So, given all uncertainties, let’s say there is a sofek. The law says so too. Why would you not accommodate both the anxious human beings and the law? Would you drive on red light if there is nobody on the other side? probably, not. I am just trying to see how a human being, not a political being, would not do chesed to humanity.

    in reply to: Jewish Might #2142681

    coffee, if I don’t have the strength, I would not be able to pick up that stone even a hundred potential shiduchim would be watching. You are right that there is a lot behind this story, like shepherds not trusting each other and Yaakov teaching them derech eretz, but arguing against the peshat is not the best way to prove your point.

    in reply to: Is a Kashrus Agency the Moral Police? #2142680

    A heksher is a private recommendation business (at least in the US) and can choose their standards. People are relying on it for reputation. Try getting a different heksher and see if people will trust it. The questionable area would be if the agency uses pressure to not let competitors in.

    in reply to: Jewish Might #2142665

    coffee, Yaakov lifting a weight is mefurash in the Chumash.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142594

    Syag,
    I am bringing you sources that demonstrate that taking actions is the right thing to do – together with the right hashkofos. And these are far from exhaustive sources, just on a surface. IF you can offer an explanation why Rava’s closing windows is different from covid isolation proposal, please do. Otherwise, you are asking your listeners to choose between your quote and a Gemora, and it is not very convincing.

    Maybe, the author’s point is about people who focus their blame primarily on easy political targets – Trump is wring here, Fauci there, it is Xi’s fault etc. That would make sense. But I don’t see how this covers individual (ventilation) or collective (vaccine distribution) action to fight the disease.

    Maybe we can understand this book better if we can understand where the limits are: I presume he and you would endorse an effort to get off the bed and make yourself a breakfast, rather than waiting for Hashem to feed you directly. Then, there are clear cases where a person is full of himself – as in the joke “thank you I found parking by myself”.

    Still, there are people who make an effort with the right attitude. One person told me that he was asked to come to a business HQ and say tehilim for a couple of hours. At the end, the boss came in, thanked him, and gave cash. The person was surprised by the cash offer and also wondered – what was happening that required tehilim. The boss said, nothing unusual, simply, the guy whom he hired to say tehilim daily was off on that day.

    So, there is some point where your effort becomes illegitimate. What defines that? I would agree that saying that our army/our doctors will save you, so no need for religion, is obviously the wrong attitude. What else?

    in reply to: Does Hashem Want Us to Survive? #2142590

    > plenty of people who are Talmidey Chachomim and Yorey Shmoyim whose great-grandparents were total Am Haartzim and who were not particularly frum

    this is not that simple. Not taking away the zechuyos, those students should not look down at their zeydes and especially bubbes. Staying Jewish and honest and not becoming murderers (like communists) in that generation was a harder test than learning in a comfortable building with food 3 times a day. Each generation has their own challenges. This is not just history, those who are zoche to still have their zeydes and great-zeydes, should listen to their wisdom even if they can not quote Rambam by heart.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142539

    I think we defined well several positions regarding acting on our own, and at least it is clear that one should not rely on ourselves, excluding Hashem from the picture. Masechet Taanit, for example, focuses more on davening as a response to natural calamities. Maybe, we can get some inspiration from people who focused more on davening and learning. What changes were introduced during covid, what additional tefilos were said … please

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142536

    common, as much as I may be guilty of inappropriate language, I don’t think I am in this case. Mazik means “someone who damages”. That is, you were presenting a danger to surrounding people. It describes technically what I think your halachik category was.

    Now, you can argue to what degree a mazik, and that is fine. This is a difficult statistical question that depends on both the mazik and the nizak. If you were hanging around your closely-spaced unmasked kehilla, then you can argue that you are not presenting any additional danger to anyone. But if a person you met was sitting at home, following Bava Kama and CDC, and ventured to buy food for shabbos, then you represent 100% of his danger.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142535

    Ok, you did not take the bait 🙂 the suggestions above are straight from the Gemora Bava Kama 60b: “The Sages taught: If there is plague in the city, gather your feet, i.e., limit the time you spend out of the house, as it is stated in the verse: “And none of you shall go out of the opening of his house until the morning” (ישעיהו כו, כ)… and “Outside the sword will bereave, and in the chambers terror” (דברים לב, כה). Then Gemora explain we need two verses to make sure we don’t go both in the morning and at night. .. And even when there is “fear inside” (pandemic is already in the community and houses ? AAQ), still do not go outside.

    Rava would close the windows of his house, as it is written: “For death is come up into our windows” (Jeremiah 9:20). (that is Rava paid attention to air propagation also AAQ).

    Now Rashi on Yeshayahu rhymes with your allegoric approach: Go, my people, enter your chambers:… enter your houses of prayer and study. Another interpretation: reflect upon your behavior in the chambers of your heart. So explained Rabbi Tanchuma.

    But this does not, I think, rejects the pshat of pandemic prevention. (the context of the Gemora – next line is how to act during famine – like Avraham, leave the city).

    So, to summarize, there is enough support for several things: doing practical things, praying, learning, and reflecting on your behavior.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142460

    I see. Would you characterize any of these approaches as kochi votzem yadi:
    spend minimal time outside of the house
    close the doors
    close the windows

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142437

    thanks for explaining your position!
    the difference here is a highly transmittable disease. So, you are ok with eating vitamins yourself, but not ok with doing something to protect the community. So, I see the priority here as opposite: someone eating unhealthy hurts primarily himself. And even as much as it is a Jewish thing to worry about each other, somehow we do not snatch the unhealthy food from our friends (maybe we should, and this stand-offish approach is goyishe influence). With Covid, behavior of one person affects health of others. So, if you are running a shul, you should do something to protect your kahal rather than ignore the issue. If you did not, then you have some responsibility for what you did not do. How is it caring about other people even controversial? Maybe that was the challenge that Hashem sent, some passed, some failed …

    Just take this outside of politicized covid discussion. Was the person with strep that you described was an erloche yid walking around in public places, presuming he was contageous?

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142432

    maybe I am missing something here. Most of us follow a lot of medical and scientific advice in our life: eat healthy food (sometimes), take prescribed medicines, brush teeth, fix cavities, wash our hands when a nurse asks us to, etc. You yourself just stated that you avoid people with strep.

    How is the covid situation different? what is wrong with suggesting that people use ventilation to decrease sickness going around. Gemora is full of medical advice of such type, including effects of air. Are all amoraim eruv rav!? Probably there is some assumptions that you apply to covid that do not apply to other cases, but I am not sure what is it.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142424

    thanks. Your interpretation of his words does not match anything I learned from multiple sources – that we are not supposed to rely on miracles and deal with issues in our world. During each calamity, we had leaders who would try to deal with issues. R Yannai would review psukim of encounter between Yaakov and Esav when going to Rome, but went there instead of staying in EY davening. R Yohanan confronted Vespasian near Yerushalaim (and was not sure till his death whether he spoke the right words).

    The author’s criticism (and similar one historically) may be directed towards those who deny Hashem’s role in the world and apply efforts that are contrary to Torah. This is totally legitimate criticism. Here, we are talking about a mitzva of protecting human lives and some people say: never mind, this piece of cloth is bothering me, I am running to the vasikin.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142415

    ok, if you do not want to elaborate, maybe someone more familiar with this rhetoric can answer. I can not parse the unspelled assumptions here.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142411

    you would need to expand on what he is actually saying for me to understand this intriguing quote.

    what is it about vaccine met with “flaming rhetoric” – by whom, flaming which way. given that the whole world is flaming one way or the other, I am not sure what is he saying.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142406

    Syag,
    your quote is not fully clear to me, but I found a couple of quotes from R Yisroel Moshe Sorotzkin online, very interesting, thanks. I am with you (and him) that Covid was (is?) an unusual punishment that has serious messages to us – especially when people were isolated, public institutions closed…

    so far, I do not see public reaction that answers this message.

    One type of reaction is to ignore the restrictions and continue “as usual”. This seems to ignore the message R Sorotzkin underscores. “Thanks for your message, Hashem, we are going as usual”.

    Another approach from some – to double-down, increase learning, better davening, increase outreach, etc. This is very respectable approach, but I am not sure it is still responsive to the message. It is like when Hashem is punishing mitzrim with blood in the water – they respond with more blood … If Hashem closed all shuls, did he davka want them to daven louder?! I presume he wanted a qualitative change.

    The approach that resonated with me was the one that Yidden should look with a fresh eye at their family, strengthen their connection, sometimes learn how to live – and to learn – with your family members, who you used to see for only 2 hours a day; strengthen connection to your friends, making sure they are OK; consider safety of others, including strangers. This last part sounds like a most profound religious message – you may unknowingly harm someone, whether a close elderly relative or a totally unknown person, via a routine interaction. Many people would be willing to do this in limited case, say when visiting a hospital, but being careful on a daily basis seems to be too much for most of population.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142391

    Common, you are focusing on apparently one person who attacked you for not wearing mask. Think about probably hundreds of people that you encountered while being a mazik. Most of these dignified people walked around you (and possibly murmured something anti-Semitic). This still does not explain why you were behaving this way..

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142191

    Syag, you are right. and mazal tov. I am not sure what is the point discussing the person who went mishugene and about whose existence we know second-hand. At the same time, we have here a sensible person admitting to his behavior …

    there is also a difference between you meeting one person with strep who is also not expecting to meet someone who is vulnerable and a pandemic situation where everyone is surrounded by potential dangers. Just put yourself in the shoes of someone who might be vulnerable, and then he needs to go to the store, and people around do not do a simple thing, required by law (NY store mandate was lifted Feb 2022).

    To use your analogy, say, I know I had exposure to strep and I see a little baby in the library. I am going to avoid that baby or where a mask if I need to pass by.

    in reply to: Yidden Shouldnt Wear Yeezys #2142192

    then why some Yidden wear hats and coats in the style of old-times non-Jews?! What is the original Jewish levush anyway?

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2142183

    I think he is trying to achieve victory through political means – either make Ukrainians seek peace because they have no lights, or make Europeans be inconvenienced by high prices, or Americans look for peace to show achievements before next election … They were able to scare everyone for several months in not providing any serious weapons.

    Russia has “frozen” conflicts in several countries already, they can manage one more as long as nobody fights back.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142181

    common, if you were doing it in violation of state low, then the irony of you complaining about someone else’s behavior is too much here …

    but let’s ask the serious question – what is halakha when 2 people have different opinions and need to act together. Say, you invite me to your house and your food is perfectly kosher by you, but I hold by some chumros. Would you feed me the food according to your standard or mine?!

    another way to look at this: you treat the person according to what he needs/wants. If you like to tell funny good-natured jokes, but you know someone is a sensitive person and will get offended – then, you do not tell him the joke. You do not say – my jokes are good, and he had to deal with it … Similarly, we support a poor person according to his former standard (if we can). Same thing here, you have a person who is afraid of something – why would you not accommodate him just because you have some machlokes with the government. Just show some chesed.

    in reply to: Pandemic amnesty #2142101

    common, was this when your state had indoor business mask mandate?

    in reply to: Who You Enable by Voting Democrat #2142098

    RebE, unemployment is not a handout, it is a state-run insurance funded by your employer as percentage of your salary.

    in reply to: Who You Enable by Voting Democrat #2142096

    It is easy to exaggerate the position of your opponent and make it look ridiculous. Everyone reasonable understands that there is a need for balance between helping and self-sufficiency. I am thinking that every time handouts are given without any controls, we reduce help that might be available to those who truly needs it.

Viewing 50 posts - 4,051 through 4,100 (of 8,954 total)