Chaim87

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 113 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Biggest supporter of Torah in the world #2300080
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @yeshivaguy45,
    Well obviously a rosh yeshiva will say that. But there is so much to question about that.
    1) How about the masses that you just know can’t and won’t be a rosh yeshiva. Let not call it masses but rather minority. Surely you just know that 25% will never be the next rosh yeshiva. We aren’t saying “no full time learning for everyone”. Just for some.
    2) Are there really no rosh yeshivas in Hesder? I see so many ehrlicha holy jews in the army that you can cry. Have you heard the story by R Asher Weiss about teflin? Why can’t there be a system for more of those boys? I do think 18 is young. But I think we can work with the govt and ask that it be extended to 21-22 when boys are more developed. At that point its not so bad if boys go to “work”. They can go to the army in EY too. I just can’t understand the culture arguement. I should say that I agree it will be harder for chasidim. But even among chasdim Belz has a weaker track. Ger is still hard core but they need to wake up and cater to the weaker ones there too. I think finding a path for chasdim will be harder but not impossible if the army is willing to work with us. But the masses are so anti anyhting.

    in reply to: Chabad Media Won #2297996
    Chaim87
    Participant

    Litfish as in clean shaven 5 towns? Or Litfish as in Lakewood?

    in reply to: Chasidus Filling a Void Within Modern Orthodoxy #2295083
    Chaim87
    Participant

    I think there is a lot of conflating things here.
    Whats a charedi and whats M.O.? Is the cool guy with 3 homes living in Toms River and a foodie eating out in $300 a plate restaurants every night, is that the classic charedi? Maybe they don’t have a formal “club” but they make sure every shabbos there is a kiddish with expensive booz and meatboards etc. Its the same thing as a club and its more prevelant in certain neighboorhoods than you’d admit. Or is it the yeshivisha guy with one broken down car living in a tiny apartment near his kollel? Even chasidim have that difference already (unless you are Skver). Some of those communities still have a kididsh in a house with home baked goods and grape juice still. Very simple and don’t even know what a meatboard is. (By the way now in B.P. there are exclusive shuls where its like its own club. Fancy mikvas with a big kiddish etc. Outsiders are not welcome. Its a new fad. )

    Now what’s an M.O, guy? Is it the Kushner type (for lack of a better term). Very modern and almost just religous because of tradition. Obviously7 huge kiddish clubs., extreme lavish lifestyles, schools are about being elite and all kinds of functions that aren’t jewish in nature. Some Coed like you speak of. But then there are the ehrlicha YU guys which exist. I worked with a Tzadik who was nifter from Covid. A VP in a large corporation, who tried to hire jews and woke up at 5 AM to learn for 2 hours daily, he had a paper where he’d write a chesbin hanefsh every night. But he was a complete YU guy. I hace come across many ehrlicha YU Teaneack guys like that.

    The real ideological difference between the two factions is, do you just keep strictly halacha or is there an idea of a 5th shluchan aruch where you have extra chumras that often our grandfathers never kept. Its a very fine line though. It plays into little things like do you need a hat and jacket when davening etc. It so happens to be that tradional jews “less serious” find it easier to integrate with M.O. and henceforth a higher rate of OTD but i don’t think it defines M.O. or that its a function of M.O. They’d go to chabad which offers a judgement free space too like Kushner.

    Bottom line both serious erhlicha and ostentatious shallowness exist in both comminutes and the level of religiosity doesn’t play a role. its a terrible illness in 2024 judisam and is a discusion in it of itself. Circling back to the key thread, Chasdius within M.O. is there to offer that falvor deeper than Halacha for those that seek.

    in reply to: A Summer of Overindulgences #2294218
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @lakewhut
    Did we forget that this world is temporary and we aren’t here forever when we pursue all this ostentatious lifestyles?

    in reply to: Another (Baltimore) response to the tuition crisis. #2291589
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Always_Ask_Questions
    I live in a community where all schools are overwhelmed. There is no threat to any school that Ill send to another school . And I won’t get into another school.

    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Kuvult
    your last thought is a scary one. During the holocaust the same thing happened in the USA. Not only that but its reported by Gisee Flieshman HYD from R weissmendl ZL group that she went to collect money and warn the jews of Hungary, just across the Slovakian border. They were partying and laughing at her living in the most lavish mansions and wearing fancy furs. The only limud zechus I’d say is, during the holocuast, it was a constant continous expansion of murdering more and more jews every day. It wasn’t just about an existimng group of jews. It was also very large in scale. Of course even on jew is too large. But if you take the mass destruction that occured continuously daily during the holocuast its very differet than this war.

    Another way to say this is, I think we all know someone who is suffering endlessly with yena machala in the hospital. I remember when my moth a’h was terminally ill with it and in enormous pain in the hospital. I skipped every simcha and was appalled by how people can just dance and live normal loves while my mother is almost in the olim haemes and yelling in pain. Now we should feel like this about every jew. But is that what hashem wants? Whats the balance? I’d say definitely if it were a holocaust then no but when yes???

    in reply to: Where Are the Righteous Gentiles of Gaza? #2291417
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @ader
    This simply not true. Many jews have gone out of their way to help and save non jews . In the 1960’s the most vocal advocate for balck rights were jews. There are numerous cases of those.


    @Always_Ask_Questions

    yes we never know. But I’d be shocked if a random Palestinians called israel out of the good of their heart to tell Israel where Hostage’s are. Most in the neighborhood didn’t even know. And i think you have way to much faith. More likely scenarios are that Israel pays informers. That doesn’t make palestianins good people. It makes them people looking for money. Palestinian good civillains in gaza don’t exist. Don’t kid yourself.

    The other two likley pointers are that
    1) israel has mossad agents on the ground roaming Gaza. (No doubt in my mind)
    2) Hamas messed up a little on this one because they posted a video of them so that they can brag. Israel has good satellite / AI intelligence that can decipher posted videos and figure out the location where it was taken.

    I think too many of you have good faith in Palestinians.

    in reply to: Another (Baltimore) response to the tuition crisis. #2291387
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Always_Ask_Questions, The issue with subsidizing everyone equally is that there simply isn’t enough money for that. And even if you ask people to be honest and not take the voucher many will still see themselves as needing it without realizing that if you lease two cars for 1000+, own a summer home and go on vacation etc then you don’t need it.
    I get that net income is very invasive but it can be done via discreet methods without anyone even knowing your name. (You can apply a case # etc.) The real issue with net income is that whats truely net income? Net income isn’t a comprehensive enough metric. You need to look at govt programs and those that get free tuition for their other school (boy vs girls( bec they are school staff or have parsonage.
    The idea that if you live a lavish lifetsyle evn if on debt tution should be paid in full is a noble idea. Perhaps the only question should be what car you drive, vacations you go on and kind of house you live in.

    in reply to: Chasidus Filling a Void Within Modern Orthodoxy #2291157
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @ujm,
    Modern orthodox today from a religious perspective is really just what many litfaks or litvaka in the USA used to be. Strictly halacha and an emphasize on not being farfrumt. Obviously introducing chasidus changes the outlook

    in reply to: Is the USA Democracy A Morally Just System #2291156
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Ex-CTLawyer

    Once again my apology for anything that was offensive.

    You agree that in certain instances such as national security the govt must censor. So is it the govt job to protect its citizens or not? Isn’t democratic electing hitler yms for example a national security issue ? Wnen do you draw the line? And then what makes the spine of our country so great if it can lead to electing evil people and newspapers inciting terror and murder?

    in reply to: Another (Baltimore) response to the tuition crisis. #2290321
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @ujm,
    I agree to leave medicad out of the equation. But we could clalculate the cost of medical care for the accountnat and deduct that. Premuims are set fees. At minimum deduct his premuim like taxes.


    @coffee
    addict; A classic family of 6-7 which is the avreage jewish family is elegible for most programs earning 50K. I need to check about earned income but the other programs for sure.

    Also left out of the math, does that person get parsonage? So he/.she may earn only 50K but on top of that some buisnees are allowed to pay for a childs tution pre tax and not part of the perosns income. he/she may have 3 free tutions on top of programs. They also may be a rebbe and have free tution. That also needs to be counted as income as the accoutnat doesn’t get that

    in reply to: Another (Baltimore) response to the tuition crisis. #2290215
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @ujm
    Simple what you receive from the govt is “income” too.

    For example, an accountant earns 90K after taxes then pays 15K in health care costs. His income should be 75K.
    A low income earner earns 50K after taxes but we ask him how much do you receive in SNAP, HUD , WIC & CHS and earned income? Its dollar values are all known. If that sums to 50K that means he should be assessed at 100K.

    Why isn’t the fair? Will the schools really do that?

    in reply to: Chasidus Filling a Void Within Modern Orthodoxy #2290209
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @sechel83
    Litfaks today are very connected to a rebbe too. Litfkas today do things on a deeper level than schar and onesh too. Everything you say is very much what “Litfish” lakewood is today. Follow the aderi torah event and its all about a simcha and depper way of life vs just the old approach.

    Meanwhile many chasidm today are about schar and onesh whether its baout taknos and rules that a kehila has are just in general how they teach tznuis today. Your description of chasdim is the old chasdim of 200 years ago. Read for example the sefer torahros hkodesh from the shomeri emunim about tznuis. Its more about schar and onesh . Satmar and mnay chasdim follow that.

    in reply to: Is the USA Democracy A Morally Just System #2290206
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Ex-CTLawyer
    I apologize for any offensive comments. I didn’t mean it in the way it was interpreted but don’t want to dwell on it other than to say I apologize.

    You still did not address my point. Sure in a democracy a paper can go out of business as many did and its up to the consumer. Yes if If people don’t buy the newspaper or watch the network, the business fails, But what “If people DO buy the newspaper or watch the network? And that network is “Der Strummer” What is 51% vote of Hitler YMS? How does democracy save us from those dangers? And if it doesn’t what make sits so moral? It does not help that I have a choice not to buy the paper or vote?

    I am not sure what was offensive about my Jan 6 reply. My point was that free speech can threaten democracy and its shouldn’t be a blank check. Based on the little glimpse of you I think we are both on the same page when it comes to Jan 6 and that it was a stain to our demorcacy.

    in reply to: Is the USA Democracy A Morally Just System #2290036
    Chaim87
    Participant

    Ex-CTLawyer

    Let me also add that the recent incident on the NY subway further proves the point that we need to be tougher on free speech. Once you let the masses gather say whatever they want, you can’t control them for terrorizing people. its a natrual flow. its true with free palestine and its true with Jan 6 that was a threat to our democarcy

    in reply to: Is the USA Democracy A Morally Just System #2290035
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Ex-CTLawyer

    You keep on missing my point. In a democracy a populist whether a newspaper and politician can sway so much influence that people will indeed continue to buy that newspaper or vote for that bully. Why do you keep on arguing that we have a choice to not purchase that newspaper? How does a population having that choice protect the morally corrupt , murderers from taking charge? If a newspaper for example, is popular enough and convinces the masses that Hamas or maybe its 1932 and it convinces people that Nazism is the right approach. You can yell from today till tommorw not to buy it, but enough people will buy it because pouplism like cults gets the masses to drimk the kool aid. A demorcacy can’t protect you from evil influnces if they are popular enough.

    So again i ask you what does it help that “I” choose not to buy the paper. They are still enoguh foolish people who drink morally corrupt kool aid. How does deomracy protect you from that?

    Your arguemnt is completely irelleavnt

    in reply to: Another (Baltimore) response to the tuition crisis. #2290033
    Chaim87
    Participant

    Once again I fail to see how Baltimore correctly captures net income. i assume the mentality there is not to be as dependent upon govt progarms. But how do you calculate that in other communities where at times those on programs earn more than those not on programs?

    in reply to: Is the USA Democracy A Morally Just System #2289767
    Chaim87
    Participant

    Ill just throw in yerterdays Hamas protest that threatened and frightened jews in NYC when supporting and calling for another Oct 7. Me being able to vote doesn’t help hwne bully popuplists have the masses under their spell. Limits to free speech help more

    in reply to: Chasidus Filling a Void Within Modern Orthodoxy #2289578
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Always_Ask_Questions

    It’s pronounced litfaks but ok. I don’t think the gra minhag or Shita had to do with chasidus. But it was a change in the pure halacha followed in Europe as the rema.

    in reply to: Another (Baltimore) response to the tuition crisis. #2289551
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Kuvult,

    what does post tax mean? Do you count earned income child tax credits which means a famiy receives money?
    Does it count HUD, SNAP, CHS & WIC medicad?
    What about parsonage?
    What if a rebbe gets free tutions (or a girls teacher)

    SNAP = 15K a month
    HUD = 30K a month
    Earned income =7500
    WIC = 5000
    CHS = 10K
    Medciad gain vs private employee paid insurnace =7500 (using a low numner)
    Total : =75kK

    I left out free tution for rebbaim

    I have a high suspicion that these calculations won’t be included. What ends up happening is that the accountant who earns say 100K net income, (after taxes) but not receiving any programs. He is capped at 20% = $20K Now lets say you have a “low income earner” . He earns only 75K, he is capped now at $15K. But after his govt programs he really earns close to 150K and should pay more than the accounant at 30K.

    Hereby lies your issue unless they are ready to get into the guts. You can’t view income like the govt does

    in reply to: Chasidus Filling a Void Within Modern Orthodoxy #2289449
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @ sechel83
    Again litfaks believe in a rebbe too. And exactly how you describe Chabad. I will say though that just because someone is crowned Reba because his father was doesn’t make him Reba. The idea that it’s an inheritance doesn’t stem for chasdim. Historically it went to the most esteemed student and not yerusha. Some of the rebas today are clowns and certainally not the most ehrlicha chasdim. P.S. sadly in litfish a circles it starting to become this way too. Although if you totally can’t strong together a shtickel Torah on the Gemara and say a shuir it’s still impossible to be a rosh yeshiva .

    in reply to: Who influences your vote? #2289187
    Chaim87
    Participant

    Depends what the vote and issue is. Sometimes it pertains to local issues and local askanim or rav knows better than me. Sometimes its more of a political viewpoint like who should be president etc and nobody really knows

    in reply to: Chasidus Filling a Void Within Modern Orthodoxy #2289186
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Always_Ask_Questions

    What came first? The Rema & Minhag ashkenaz. Litfaks started slighlty after chasdim under the GRA (unless you say that the Besht wasn’t really the same as the current chsdisha movement which started more under he Magid)

    in reply to: Is the USA Democracy A Morally Just System #2289185
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Ex-CTLawyer.

    Just so that i am clear, the idea that one or a few individuals can sway a powerful well establshed newspaper by simply choosing not to read it, has no merit. As long as the paper still has the broad audeinece it has the bully pulpit. Populists whether politicans or newspapers sway the public because of thier charsima and connections. They don’t sway them because they are morally correct. When a populist newspaper (or politcan) gets a hold of a large audience there is no way that a moral individual can stop them from inciting and enabling terrorists to commit the most viscous crimes. The danger of democracy is exactly that. Its that despite the fact that a voter or reader has the free choice not to read, If the paper holds enough sway vis populism and its bully pulpit then the majorty’s of the people’s choices will be immoral and worse result in heinous acts. Somethimes the only way to stop them is via having an authoritarian who gets it. (within reason). The best illustration is that Israel shut down Al Jezzera ( and somewhat the AP). I know the NYT calls that “authortatian” but you know that Israel is still very democratic and that Bibi is 1000 times more normal than trump despite his faults and ego. The NYT is a populist bully.

    in reply to: Is the USA Democracy A Morally Just System #2289115
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Ex-CTLawyer
    A case study worth noting is Egypt. Everyone foolishly yelled democracy during the Arab spring and the Muslim brotherhood was “democratically “ elected. Then Al Sisi had the forthright to be an authoritarian and throw them out. The west yelled oy what happened to basic democratic rights. It’s an abuse etc. Well fast forward to Oct 7. Hamas and the brotherhood are one and the same. I shudder to think what would have happened had we chosen democracy over doing the right the thing even when it’s authoritarian. Democracy isn’t always the moral thing

    in reply to: Is the USA Democracy A Morally Just System #2289110
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Ex-CTLawyer

    I prepared a response to every point but item #3 made my blood boil especially how you drink the democracy kool-aid just copying and pasting liberal arguments without any moral highground

    #3 I hate that argument that if you don’t like the views on your news station don’t watch or read. i find that so shallow on the surface. We aren’t just talking about a left vs right newspaper with a fair debate about taxation etc. We are talking about a new station that causes people to die and has a huge influence. My personal choice doesn’t affect that outcome as long as enough people but their lies. Thats why its a danger and they need to be called out as an enemy. You need a mature person to shut them down. This isn’t a freedom issue.

    The hostages are OUR hostage’s because
    A) They are some Americans
    B) Israel is America’s allies.

    Its not just hostages but in general enabling Hamas by belittling Israel is outright supporting terror. Just today the NYT wrote how Israel killed dozens of “innocent civilians” where they alleged Hamas operatives where hiding. The truth is that Israel killed dozens of terrorists who were hiding among civilian’s and very few civilians. The ones that did die like died because they were knowingly harboring terrorists or were the terrorists own wife and kids who davka put them in harms way vs indiscriminate genocide bombing . You and I know this. And when the NYT lies like that they endanger everyone. So yes the govt should shut down the NYT . if that’s anti democracy so be it. Its the right thing to do. Let me be super clear. When it comes to the gaza war there is no two sides that normally applies in a democratic society. There is just one moral side here. Its Pure evil vs the good. And a gpovt needs to stick up for the good and stamp out evil enablers like the NYT, Stop drinking the democracy holy kool aid

    in reply to: Chasidus Filling a Void Within Modern Orthodoxy #2289055
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @DaMoshe
    If you study history you will see that the idea of Das torah and that you must follow your rebbe without disputing him (like chasdim) is a new thing. In the big yeshivas a rebbe taught them torah but they were not mevtal to the rebbe. Research what it was like in Telz, Slabodka, Volozhin etc. Even in the Mir. The litfisha view of a rebbe was limited to just being someone who you learned torah by and not that you were mevatl to him. The whole das torah movement started by R Chaim Ozer but even then it wasn’t like today. Most were independent thinkers. (The exception was the close talmidum of R Chaim maybe). Mnay old rosh yeshivas even held that they need to keep distance and not get too warm with talmidim. If you never study history this will be hard to believe. the fact that you feel attached to R Bender shlita is because litfisha today aren’t what they used to be. its a great thing but its not old school litfaks. Re your point about chasdim not even meeting a rebbe yet follwoing his every word, I don’t see why The tzadfik R chaim Kaneivsky zl was so different. Yes I was zocheh once or twice to get a bracha vahatzlacha from him but I really never saw him yet follow his every word like a reba. R chaim was part of the “litfisha” chasdis” and my reba.

    in reply to: Applying FDR’s Germany stance for Gaza #2288865
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @akuperma
    You really believe that Hitler YMS would have stuck to his terms of the deal under a conditional surrender? He broke every deal before that including with Russia.. Cmon I have a bridge to sell you if even think that any “conditional deal” would have helped. It only would have extended the war and bloodshed. The last few communities that the rasha missed he would have reached, And the condztions offered included Germany still retaining half of Europe.

    Japan completely capitulated and I am not sure where you got that anything was conditional.

    Re Hamas, you miss the point and in a way they are worse than Germany. Germany was a refined cultured country that got a craz (obviously hashem wanted that but beztem they were refined normal people) Palestianins are influcned by a cult and drink the kool aid. They can’t behave if they wanted to,You think you will disram hamas as long as they are still at all intact? You think hamas will ever let someone “not sponsoring” terror to run the country? They will kill him in a second. Yes Hamas is a pain in the tuchus but they other “peaceful” countries still enable them. Look at Qatar & Turkey. Egypt has this secret pact that Hamas could do whatever they want including smuggling stuff as long as nothing is out in the open within Egypt territory. Don’t forget Egypt is half muslim brotherhood= Hamas. You think you can trust anyone to disarm Hamas? Frankly its a bit naive.

    in reply to: Chasidus Filling a Void Within Modern Orthodoxy #2288743
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @sechel83, So it sounds like we agree that litfaks today in many ways are chasdish.

    I also think your defintion of chasidish is very narrow based (Mostly the chabad based) Your defintion that its about the mindset , “penemis Hatorah” etc. and that its almost an intellectual mindset approach is too narrow. Being chasdish is also about a feel for judaism vs doing this robotically because it says in the torah. That means a few things. Firtsly, doing a mitzvah with a fire and happyiness. Whether its davening or lighting a menora or shaking luluav. We don’t just light a m enora and go back to the germara. We dance and farbriegan plus learn a little by the menora. Thats not so much an intellectual aspect rather its just a physcal connection where you ” enjoy” the mitzva because its part of our life and isn’t just a book a of codes. Its also about kedusha and being extra tznuis, because its not just a book of codes rather its about living for something higher we strive to observe more than just the halcha. The same is about kashrus. Pure halacha perhaps allows cholov stam. But we can do better and be more stringent. Many chasdim only ate meat from their shochet or ruv. Again they live for a higher being and its a way of life vs just a book of rules lehavdil. All this, is to say its more than just an intllectual exercise. Perhaps the earlier seforim and chabad focus on that but once you get to rebas of 150 years ago like the Tsanzer ruv or Belza it;s focus isn’t about the deep thinking rather its more about a way of life that’s more inetrnalized.

    in reply to: Chasidus Filling a Void Within Modern Orthodoxy #2288613
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @sechel83,
    Litfaks these days are more connected to a rebbe than chasdim. Dad Torah and having a rebbe is a crucial part of litfaks today . It wasn’t that way 100 years ago.

    The chumros that litfaks do today are not anymore just based on fear or sachar rather it’s now because of a deeper inner love of Hashem.

    And again litfaks are centered today on being connected with a rebbe or as they call a rosh yeshiva. And so again the litfaks are more chasidish than chasdim

    in reply to: Chasidus Filling a Void Within Modern Orthodoxy #2288442
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @sechel83
    Your point about all chasdism vs litfaks is very nice in philosophy. In the reality of 2024 many chasdim just do it out of fear and the chumras come first. Leaving out chabad but look at some of the other sects and the fear factor instilled in it. Meanwhile, many litfaks today (have lots of ehlricha chadsdim mingled in) already observe chumros bec of love of hashem or as you say as a result. They sing and daven long too. This line has blurred and one can probably say litfaks today are more chasdish. (For example when chasdim only observe ceratin chumors bec they are bullied into it, is that a “result of love for hashem? I think even its leaders will argue that they need to observe the chumaros and then they will love hashem like the chazon ish. (I won’t say which chasidus bullies but we know it exists)

    Re Kedusha, its defintley the approach of Toldas Aron as per the shomieri emunim to yell about it. I believe most of Hungarian jewry does. Almost every chasdisha rav yells about it by his drashas in 2024. In general the derech of hungrain chasdim were to publcially speak and yell about it. I know chabad doesn’t but others do. And in 2024 it has grown to every chasdis aside for maybe chabad. Please don’t start quoting old chasdisha sefarim as thats an endless debate. You’ll find one way but there are tins the other way. Just look around at most chasdim today and its a fact they all preach about it. I don’t know of screaming about it causes people to be nechashal more. But we all do see that Chabad today in 2024 most defintley has plenty of tznuis and kedusha issues. You can’t deny that. Thus, the idea that its approach is more the right path isn’t convincing.

    Lastly, while my keep point remains that chasdism and litfaks switched roles almost, Ill also say there is a 3rd dynamic. People who abuse the chasdic view you illustrate. The view that you just need to love hashem and everything else will come. As someone pointed out thats a feel good thing and it took off like fire in certain new movements. It only works if while thanking hashem you really seek to live a life of what hashem wants of us. Not a life of fluxury and ostentatiousness but if i say I love Hashem all is good.

    in reply to: Is the USA Democracy A Morally Just System #2288419
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @yytz,
    You bring out a good point. I suppose I question specifically the American style democracy. I advocate that yes maybe we need a style like you outline in France. And yes if a populist can be elected perhaps some kind of authoritarian is needed with some checks and balances,

    I disagree with your last statement and thats my point. No these things can not be changed. When someone is a populist for example, your vote for a different candidate won’t help. The point of populism is that evil people like Hitler YMS can be elected because they know how to channel human emotion even when they can cuase massive destruction. You are just one person who is wise and see through such people but your vote can’t stand against an evil populist A populist by definition exploits democracy, Similarly, you can’t just start a new media company. Its not like starting a gorcery store. The NYT is so powerful and populist in its way. You can’t match it. Meanwhile it continues to spread blood libels that result in deaths of jewish lives. A bit of authoritarian govt (like what Israel has when shutting down Al Jezzera and trying to shut down the AP) is the only answer. The same is true for gun laws. And good luck advocating to change the second amendment. Once again if something is so popular it can make zero sense and you can’t fight it.

    in reply to: Is the USA Democracy A Morally Just System #2288248
    Chaim87
    Participant

    1) I believe its a machlokos and they must be warned. Furthermore, generally the crimes are totally different in nature, like eating chazor on Yom kippur. There is the eating chazor and the yom kippur which are so far distinct. Only in the American justice systems are there a boatload of crimes that are all very similar and really the same crime.
    2) If you refer to the arrests at the museum shabbos, the arrests were only made after the fact once the peace was disturbed. Why was the protest ever allowed to begin with without permits? had it been covid and a frum jewish levaya we wouldn’t have gotten to square one.
    3) Even if we yelled for a total destruction of gaza that would be morally correct after Oct 7. I don’t need to debate with you why that is correct. Only colleges that brainwash naïve kids or Muslims living in a cult think different. You & I know that all of them cheered on oct 7 and calling for their destruction wouldn’t be the kind of immoral free speech. No its not a two way street. You can impose rules that limit free speech at times just as Germany did with nazis. Does that mean less democracy sure? But so what? My point is that democracy is no virtue when free speech results in jewish blood being spilled. A little authoritarian would do some good.
    4) yes so maybe its better for the govt to tell us things. No it doesn’t mean anything and everything . You take this zero sum game like either total democracy or total auhtoirty. There is an in between. And frankly, if the govt telling us things mean that the NYT won’t spill jewish blood and print blood libels then so be it.

    in reply to: Interesting response to the tuition crises. #2288171
    Chaim87
    Participant

    Is this connected to the Baltimore scholarship initiative where you need to fill out a detailed form of your finances?
    I love that idea too. My only crtique is that I think that form leaves out alot. You can’t look at “gross income” in the same way the govt would. You need to look at “net income”. If someone is for example a rebbe and they get free tuition for their boys (or vice versa a teacher in girls school) , plus parsonage and they then receive HUD, WIC, SNAP, Medicad, earned income credits etc. Meanwhile a struggling accountant earning double the rebbe salary on a gross level doesn’t receive those benefits , the accountant is mathematically poorer. To be clear, this is only intended to provide a mathematical view of affordability and not to get into discussions of rebbe salary.

    in reply to: Chasidus Filling a Void Within Modern Orthodoxy #2288136
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @sechel83,

    You are describing one nitch of chasdus called chabad. I hate to say this but Chabad isn’t the only chasidsha group nor does it have a right to claim that only its way is the true way. There are many ways to serve hashem including many chasdisha ways. The big broad chasdisha groups whether its belz, satmar, Ger or chabad all believed that the way to serve hashem with more of a feeling and heart while Litfaks were more focused on just observing whats strictly required by the torah. That means that things like davening we only to obeserve the halcha part but who says its needs to be with a bren and fire or that everything needs a minyan. When it comes to kedusha thats not anyhwere in the torah so who says we need to do more. Most chasdim aside for chabad actually do very much scream about shmiras enyiam (look at the shomieri emunim’s sefer tahros kakodesh) and thats a big thing. Yes that is a chasdisha thing and you have no right to say it isn’t because its not chabad’s thing. The idea of kedusha is, that nowehere in the torah does it explicltiy outline the exact limits. But if one lives for a deeper meaning and wants to do it for hashem kedusha is a focus. Its 100% a chasdisha concept that must be spoken about. Same is true about kashrus where chasdim have more chumras bec even tough techincally maybe chalov stam is permitted we live to a higher standard than just what the torah allowed.

    Yes chabad differs in that its about training your mind while other chasdim believe its about being extra observant than just the torah but chasdis is living for more then the torah and a code of laws. Once again sorry but chabad is just one of many chasdism.

    This is all leads to my point, the old school litfak is almost non existent aside for the “frum Modern orthdox black hats who still kind of subscribe to that.

    in reply to: 34 x GUILTY #2287662
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @ CTLAWYER,

    To be completely transparent I agree that Trump is guilty. But I don’t get your title labelled “34 counts”. Morally this concept that from one minor sin a person can violate so many crimes just because you found some written law, is just absurd. I get that without each law what’s the sin. But the fact that you can twist 34 laws into one little crime is just a perversion of justice. At the end of the day it’s one count. Did he sin or not? And especially to punish him for each count? It seems so banana republic like.it’s one masa averio.

    I’ll also throw in another mockery of our wonderful justice system. We love to tout that hey he was convicted by a jury of his peers who were selected by both sides. But here is the thing, the judge still has all the leeway as to what the jury is allowed to listen to and what they must disregard. The judge can narrow it down so thin that the jury basically most convict because they just discard everything the defence said. (I am exaggerating but bringing out a point) If the judge is bias your case os doomed. A judge can indeed decide your fate. Our system isn’t moral and isn’t decided by a jury.

    in reply to: Chasidus Filling a Void Within Modern Orthodoxy #2287412
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @DaMoshe,

    Umm Litfaks mesora is the same as chasdim. It stems from the GRA . Its about the same time as the Besht
    Re the feel good aspect , one can argue that litfaks have also a feel good intellectual argument where its all about torah

    Now the real mesora is Yekkis and ashkenzai jews. Not litfaks. That means doing things like the Rema. And yes saying yotzer on YT etc.

    Now we need to fast forward to todays society where you have a point. Chasdim aren’t suppose to be just a feel good thing. Its supposed to be about really observing extra Keddusha (extra tznuis) davening for long even in the weekdays in a hurry etc. Meanwhile litfaks historically, Litfaks only cared about torah and halchaha but not tefila or kedusha.

    Fast foward to today, unfortunately chasdim are being abused as about feeling good and partying at R Shayla while fressing meat. It became about olem hazah . Tznuis has gone down too. And we have formally non chasdim part of newly made fake chasdish movements that think thats what’s important about life. meanwhile Litfaks are now the leaders on kedusha, davening long and being ehlrich. So technically in 2024 you are correct alot of being chasdish is fake

    in reply to: what do you think of daf yomi? #2286179
    Chaim87
    Participant

    An angle not discussed on this thread, is the proliferation of various daf yomi shuirm out there on the APP. Many people who wouldn’t learn otherwise are now learning thanks to these apps. Without Daf yomi this wouldn’t be possible on this scale. To be honest, there is a downside too. Certain people who would learn otherwise now use this as a crutch. Some of these shiruim are here to make it cool but lack the full substance that someone should have when learning gemara. The fact that its a fad and a party does lack in the shimo a bit. But on the other hand its what draws people.

    My key point is, that without daf yomi these shuirum wouldn’t happen and many wouldn’t learn

    in reply to: Is the Zionist Dream Over? #2284087
    Chaim87
    Participant

    The Satmar Reba z’l was very holy and his shita is definitely highly respected. However, he was a das yachid and extreme. One almost wonders if he said many things simply so that the masses don’t get caught up with the fervor of the moment. In those days, unlike today it was very in style even among charedim to become or support zionism, He had to hammer in the point how bad it is and how we must disconnect. In reality its alot more muted. In reality in many ways its a bracha for all jews.

    Most other gedolim did not hold like the Satmar reba.

    Re 1948, I never heard that the zionists had a choice not to fight. That’s revisionist history. Once they UN passed a resolution we were attacked. Perhaps you want to argue that who asked the tzionim to push that resolution? That’s easy for you to say now in 2024. In 1947 noone wanted the jews even after the holocuast including the USA. Europe was becoming communist and closing the iron curtain. What was our choices?

    Re 1967: Yes technically Israel attacked first. But everyone in their right mind knew Israel was on the brink. Had they not attacked first 5 countries would have attacked us. Yes the fight started over the Suez canal and the satmar reba said who asked Israel to pick a fight over a water channel. But cmon without that cannel Israel can’t function. And it would have just pushed Egypt to do more The reba says the success of the 6 day war was masa soton. But almost every other gadol said it was nissim.

    As the tzadik R wolfson shlita says, in 1948 it was an eis ratzzon for moshaich. Instead hashem gave us some broken shards (shiveri kelim) to hold onto after all the tzaras we went through in the form of a state of Israel.

    Its easy to be a hothead in 2024 but before you are a big talker research your facts and imagine you lived then

    in reply to: Netura Karta Protesting at College Campuses #2284074
    Chaim87
    Participant

    I continue to say that I see no heter from a tznuis standpoint. These NK are people whose wives never wear a shitel even bec its not tznuis. Offically they uphold the strictest standards. They’d never attend ball games or walk into a goyisha store. They’d never work with goyim. Why is it all of a sudden OK to stand near shkitzas at the shpitz timah called college?

    in reply to: Netura Karta Protesting at College Campuses #2283817
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @ujm,

    You keep on getting stuck on the same question just different flavors. The answer is very simple.
    1) Ehrlicha jews don’t shop at these stores, don’t take subways, don’t go to ball games and don’t work in mixed gender businesses. B&H is the typical illustration of holy jews. Many don’t go chol hamoed to amusement parks either. I think NK considers themselves on that same level. They aren’t some modern group who generally attends ball games and hangs out at the beach. Would NK ever walk into Target? I think not because of pritzus.
    2) There is a difference whether you are walking into non tznuis crowds for yourself or whether you are doing it for yiddshkiet and/ or to mekadash shem shomiam. When you walk into target or old navy it isn’t a “trip” for jewish reasons. Its a trip to buy things. You aren’t there to “spread” judiasm or “lkasdiash shomiam”. Its doesn’t serve as a religious purpose. But when are attending a rally for religious purposes or to be mekadaish shomiam that has to be with the most upholding tznuis and jewish standards. Note, not that I am fully endorsing Target visits but its just a very different nature.

    This response was noted above already and I’d appreciate an answer how you reconcile it. Your response is flawed

    in reply to: Netura Karta Protesting at College Campuses #2283620
    Chaim87
    Participant

    I get the evilness of NK but thats not my focus now. I am asking the crowd a very narrow question that i think gets to the crux of the issue. Why isn’t tznuis an issue at college campus protests? Is it because they were masks ? LOL. The best answer I got was, well you also go to work and ball games. But that’s a flawed answer because ehrlicha jews don’t work or attend games where tznuis is an issue

    in reply to: Netura Karta Protesting at College Campuses #2283452
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @ujm,
    Going to work is because there is no choice and you need to support a family.
    But to the greater point whether its work or a ball game, two things.

    1) You aren’t doing either of that in the name of religion or avodas hashem. (yes one must always remain frum but its not for the name of judaism or kiddish hashem. No=one attend s ball game to be mekadish shem shomaim.). These protests are supposed to be to be mekadish shem shomaim. How are being holy by standing near shkitzas? You think hashem wants you to violate tznuis?
    2) The attendees are generally jews who are holding by holy standards and not the common folk. The ehrlicha chasdim don’t believe in working in secular environments and shun ball games because of this too. B&H for example has separate sections for men and women. Ehrlicha yidden taka don’t work in mixed environments. I think most of these NK jews are roughly the same level of ehrlich like stamaras at B&H who don’t take the subway and sit separate at work.

    So again I ask what’s the heter tznuis wise?

    P.S> if they went to the Israeli consulate and protested separately without mingling then I wouldn’t ask this question.

    in reply to: Is the Zionist Dream Over? #2283449
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @HaKatan,

    what are you making up? alternative facts? The war of independence was fought because Israel was attacked. It was self defense. This is pure lies feed to you.
    “apologetics about the oaths and all the rest.” no no. Its not” apologetics “. Its the true halacha. Rabbi Hirsch’s view was extreme and not accepted. You take it as a given that we must abide by 3 oaths and then anyone who disagrees is just trying to be “apologetics “. It was never our mesora or halcha to pasekn like aggadata and that gemara is unclear. This is toras emes. Not torah bent to use for your anti zionist rhetoric..

    The zionists rallied the USA in the 1920’s to have visa quotas? what kind of lies do you spew. The zionists had nothing to do with USA policy about immigration. In fact the rasha Stephen Weiss who was FDR advisor was anti zionists. (As R yeruchim z’l gave a shmuxz in the Mir, it was pure sodom.)

    Its very in style to be a hot head today and being anti zionist is very “in”. But you lack facts and make things up. Just like you can’t tell me the heter for NK to attend protests with women in colleges? Pritzus gevald. What happened to tznius?

    in reply to: Netura Karta Protesting at College Campuses #2283328
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @HaKatan / other supporters,

    You didn’t answer my question, how is it permitted tznuis wise to stand near shiktzas dressed immodestly at a college shpitz tumah? I didn’t ask about hashkafah or kiddish hashem? I don’t think a chabad shliach should stand in Times Square or a night club either. How is this permitted tznuis?

    Furthermore is it permitted to be meschaber and join goyim who don’t observe to Torah in any protest?

    in reply to: Is the Zionist Dream Over? #2283225
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @ujm,

    You forgot that in 1948, America did not let jews leave eastern Europe. We had tough quotas. in 1956, they let in some Hungarians. Many in the early years after the war including my family were not allowed into the USA. Hah they not had Israel, many would have died in Russia under stalin and Kruscheif Yimach shimo. I don’t know where you get your facts in saying that Jews under Stalin were better off than in Israel. Its just so false on every level. It talks to the insanity of modern day society where hyper beliefs whether its the far right or far left (trump crazies vs antifa) or its free Palestine (and nakba) aka antii “evil zionists” or yes the other extreme that we have to conquer every inch and never compromise, Study your facts.

    PS if you mean that jews are now safer in Russia / Putin vs Israel that may be true. But historically its untrue
    You are correct in saying that Israel is still golus. and that there is no kohci vatzim yadi altough there are open nissim with israel as many gedolim stated after the 6 day war.

    in reply to: Is the Zionist Dream Over? #2283150
    Chaim87
    Participant

    HaKatan
    I love how you quote R Chaim Volzhin. Many zioniosts came out of the yeshiva . the chovai tzion movment under the netziv happened there too. I urge you to speak to older jews around after the holocaust. For some reason that don;t generally feel the same about the medina. Ask yourself why not? They are wiser than you. The answer is because they saw the alternatives . They grew up knowing what its like to not be wanted by anyone. Its easy to judge now.

    in reply to: Is the Zionist Dream Over? #2283147
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @HaKatan
    Forgive me for saying this but you have revisionist history. you take the classic millennial approach similar lehvadil to the free Palestine folks who know noting but whats feed to them at the moment. Today its very in style be Satmar or Brisk. But the truth is that 75 years ago those were extreme right positions and not mainstream of klal yisroel . They were huge gedolim and holy jews. I will not knock these tzadkim in any manner. But there were the “das Yachid”. Even the way you knock my views as “zioniat propoganda ” as if I am a tzioni when i am not and have never followed them is just kind of bniave 2024 talk without studying the facts. Yes sure you have R Elchanon too, but thats about it.

    Let get the chafetz chaim and the fake news and lies that you repeat over form brisk without verifying. The FACT is that in 1923 at the aguda convention the Chafetz chaim walked out as a protest because someone came to bashmutz R kook. He refused to go back in for the rest of the convention despite schlepping there as an older man already. Every older yeruhslami knows that the Chafetz chaim tried to come to EY. One of his big goals was to visit R kook and make peace between him and R Sonnefled z’l. Its well known that the kanoim say its beshert that he didn’t make it because if the C chaim made it to EY there would be no kanoim left. The mekublaim said that had the C chaim came he would have made shalom and moshiach would have come. R Kook, shver, the aderes helped the Chaim write his sefer about yidden drafted in the army. After the aderes was niter the C chaim asked R kook to help him. So don’t sell me buba masses about the C chaim and R kook. These are facts.
    (Side note, an older yershlaumi yid told me that at his fathers chasna both R kook and R yosef chaim sat together and were shmuzing. This is despite his alleged cherem. I don;t think he is lying about his own fathers wedding)

    Re R Kook and a “war”, not a single war in Israel was made by choice., You make it sound like oh we went out to capture. Every war Israel ever fought was forced upon us. Anyone would permit that.

    Let me also say that many mnay gedolim held of a state whether its Rizyhner rebas, R ytizchok elchnanon, the dvar avraham and even later on people like the rav of yeshulaim who wrote a famous sefer (forgot his name now). R hsraga feivel medleovitch made a bracha when the medina was founded. Punvitcha Rav said hallel with an israeli flag. At the punivitch chanukas hbayis in 1953, all zionist leaders were invited and one even spoke. Many mnay gedollim were preseent too. I can list so many more gedolim who held of a state. But thats beside the point. tTe overwhelming majority held once its here, we need need to support it and that the good outweighs the bad.

    Re the 3 shavous, again stamar and Brisk were a das yachid. When he took on the R Hirsch zl shita of shalosh shavous it was a huge chiddish. There are many ways to answer that such as that its agaddata, its only when goyim keep it too etc. (Its also funny that in the USA Stamar isn’t scared to take land from the state of NY. But OK.)

    Re Todays zionists, again you have no clue what kind of rasha Ben Gurion was, looking to kidnap jewish kids just to shmad them. He hated anyone frum. Today the fight is simply that frum people fight and share the burden. Yes its a fair arguemnt to say that we learn torah and that we can’t share a burden with secular people. But lets not get carried away and call that shmad.

    in reply to: Is the Zionist Dream Over? #2282929
    Chaim87
    Participant

    All big talkers influenced by todays zealot kanyous in style brands. After the war noone else wanted us and Israel was the place to go. Speak to your grandparents who were survivors. notice they almost all were pro zionisim. They went through ghenim and understood. Its easy to sit in the USA and be a hot head. It comes from immaturity just like the naïve ceasefire protestors. what do you really know about zionism?

    Here are some fun facts; R Kook z”l was R shloma zalman z’l and R Elyahsiv’s rebbe. Many gedolim held like him although hard to know if most. We do know that MOST gedolim held of him including the chafetz chaim who wanted to make peace between him and R Chaim S.

    I know gedolim made all kinds of statements. But at the end of the day most of them were really just against the secular nature of the state vs the concept of taking it back or the 3 shavous. Yes they will say different but thats the real truth.

    Re today, these are just tinok shneshbos who no longer look to shamd. Stop it with this “zionist’ nonsense

    in reply to: Matza complaint letter #2280478
    Chaim87
    Participant

    Manichewitz (owned by Kedem now) now makes hand made shmurah matzah. Its almost never broken. They claim its all hand made. (is there some loophole where a machine still does part of it? I don’t know. But if fully handmade they are almost all whole)

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 113 total)