Ex-CTLawyer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 301 through 350 (of 3,279 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Shame on EVERY Democrat – re Islamist-bigot Ilhan Omar #2162707
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @ToShma
    My point about constituents is that they elected a member of the House (whether I like the choice is not an issue) and expect her to be able to serve on all committees to which she was appointed. They did not cede this power to other members of the House.
    There are 435 constituencies who have elected voting members of the House and it is my opinion the constituents should not be diminished in importance by a vote of the members.

    in reply to: Shame on EVERY Democrat – re Islamist-bigot Ilhan Omar #2162705
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @ToShma
    Now you claim to have been quoting something, BUT I. The topic and your actual post no quotation marks exist.
    I have no idea if it is in fact a quote or your summation of something I read.
    Your posted topic is where you lay Shane in every Democrat and does not have the source listed. Your post has the source but does not lay shame.
    My taking you to task has to do with your topic

    in reply to: Shame on EVERY Democrat – re Islamist-bigot Ilhan Omar #2162493
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @ToShma
    Of course you meant ….
    Then why didn’t you use that word in the topic you chose? We are not all mind readers, or have read a specific report. Instead you smeared every registered Democrat including me.
    I mention constituents as they are the only people she represents and is answerable to (in terms of reelection or defeat). They don’t lose their right to be represented on a House committee (I didn’t agree with others being removed in the past).
    ————————/-///////——————
    Senator Schumer does not represent me, I am not a NYer. You conveniently ignore the point that loyalty, even to a party is also part of principles. They may be principles to which you or I don’t agree, but loyalty is a principle nevertheless.

    in reply to: How to Reduce the Cost of Getting Married #2162500
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @AAQ
    No, prices don’t need to be controlled because some people want what is above their means.
    People need to live within their means.

    In the 1950s, my eldest brother had an over the top three day Bar Mitzvah celebration on a public holiday weekend. In many ways it was a celebration of my father’s business success not my brother.
    It was soon followed by business reverses for my father, and my Bar Mitzvah consisted of a kiddish and luncheon for about 100 guests in the synagogue social hall. No night affair, no orchestra. I wasn’t scarred emotionally. It was what my parents could afford at the time without going into debt.

    Every time we spend money we make choices and live with the consequences. If in fact the parents and chatan are working, as you post, and can’t afford to make the chasunah then instead of controlling prices we should examine their ability to earn, low salaries or perhaps their spending history that makes them unable to afford the prices.

    in reply to: Shame on EVERY Democrat – re Islamist-bigot Ilhan Omar #2162295
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Shalom-al
    I didn’t compare them and don’t care about better or worse. Their constituents are entitled to representation on House Committees based on seniority and party leadership
    I’m glad you are sure ToShma refers to Dem Representatives, not voters. However, that is not the verbiage he chose as the topic for this thread. I did not refer to voters, as many who vote for Dems are not in fact Democrats (registered members of the Party). If ToShma wishes to change what he posted, let him post

    in reply to: Shame on EVERY Democrat – re Islamist-bigot Ilhan Omar #2162231
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    You are a fool!
    The vote of some 200 m Myers of the Democrat Party in no way causes you to put shame on every registered Democrat in the country. None of us elected more than one member of the House of Representatives.
    I detest the Congresswoman but her constituents are entitled to representation and all powers of committee assignments that go with her seniority.
    I also detest M Taylor Nazi Greene but her committee assignments and power are the right of her constituents.

    Don’t like these members of the House? Donate and campaign for their opponents

    in reply to: Dental Insurance #2162232
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Dr. P
    Here in CT, yesterday the Governor announced a plan to pay off individual’s medical debt. We as a community have an obligation to provide healthcare for all.

    Mrs. CTL’s final hospital stay in August resulted in a bill of $198,000. My share after insurance and adjustments was a number of thousands of dollars. B”H I can afford to pay this, but it could put some people over the edge and cause loss of home. Medical debt is an obligation of both spouses, by law. Take a lower middle class working or retired couple hit with a large medical bill, couple it with death of a spouse and loss of income (paycheck, social security, pension) while fixed housing expense continues and it is a recipe for disaster.
    I am not dependent on the lost income, but the almost $4,000 a month in retirement income she received is no longer funding it’s way to Tzedaka each month.

    in reply to: How to Reduce the Cost of Getting Married #2161794
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @UJM
    All of my siblings and I were married in the social halls of our synagogues. That was the standard OOT for baby boomers. In fact most shul Rabbis refused to officiate at the Chasunah (or a Bar Mitzvah) unless the Seurat Mitzvah was held in the synagogue. That way the Katy’s was under the rabbi’s control. Often there was only one caterer in town.
    Of the 5 of us siblings, two had the social hall downstairs, three had the social hall on the main floor.
    Nothing wrong with a simcha in a shul.
    My parents were married during WWII in NYC. Guests had to send their ration points with RSVP cards so the caterer could get the foodstuffs. No shmorg or uninvited guests during wartime rationing.

    in reply to: How to Reduce the Cost of Getting Married #2161722
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Autocorrect changed yerushos to thrush’s, which they did not receive

    in reply to: How to Reduce the Cost of Getting Married #2161647
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Rocky
    Telling your child that these are our values does not mean they have to suffer. If they have been brought up to live within means it is not suffering. They have no false expectations.
    I could afford to make the most lavish resort or hotel based Chasunos for our children but it wasn’t our values and they did not suffer by having affairs scaled to our values.
    I think each would rather have the thrush’s they received than memories of one outlandish overpriced evening with hundreds of guests they did not even know,

    in reply to: How to Reduce the Cost of Getting Married #2160684
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Why should the kallah be the one to suffer?
    You could eliminate the solid gold watch and band for the Chassan.
    >>>>>>>>>>>!>!!!!!!!!!
    BTW, why is it always the have nots trying to change the norm by trying to eliminate something the haves can afford.
    My advice has always been: if you can’t afford it don’t do it, and don’t go into debt to impress others.

    My daughters were married in our gardens, not some expensive wedding hall. We didn’t have 500 guests, mostly unknown by chassan and kallah.

    Work out a budget you can afford and stick to it. If you can only afford a Chevrolet, you don’t buy a Bentley to impress the neighbors.

    in reply to: Arrogance at its best! #2160239
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    In addition to the funding Amil Zola mentioned above ur town’s libraries have been recipients of trust funds bequeathed to them specifically for the purchase of books requested by residents. These purchases are not funded by the taxpayers and not subject to the far right’s attempt to censor.
    Before you think it is only left wing and LGBTQ and smut that is being purchased and put on the shelf, they have purchased many a. artscroll publication at my request.
    Requests for purchases by residents are honored each year until the years Trudy income had been spent. Usually lasts about 10 months each year

    in reply to: I Worked For The State… #2158980
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    I was looking forward to my birthday next month as in Connecticut mandatory jury service had ended at age 70, alas, due to the huge backlog of cases during Covid (mostly civil) the state has increased the age to 75.

    I did however receive a notice from the Jury administration office that Mrs. CTL would not have to report for jury duty in March as scheduled. They actually have a computer program that cross references death certificates issued in state (quarterly). Now if the life insurance company who paid out her death benefit would only stop sending mail saying she is qualified for a whole life plan that pays burial benefits………

    in reply to: Different Tracks of Modern Orthodoxy #2158981
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @UJM
    It is only in areas of large frum Jewish population that all these distinction matter so much.
    In small town America making sure you have a regular minyan of frum Jews is enough and the right/left Hasidic/misnagid/Israeli divisions cease to function within the shul walls.
    This week, the shul where I attend daily minyanim (in the next town), moved minyan to the home of a member sitting shiva. He and his sons Yeshivish Litvak, 4 Israelis, 3 Hasidism and a number of us senior citizens who are EuroTraditional. Each there for the purpose of having the community make sure there was a minyan three times each day.
    In the shul, there are a half dozen varieties of siddurim that serve assorted traditions, but whoever is shsliach tzibur davens from the official shul suddur. Harmony ensures survival, we avoid the narishkeit of labeling Jews

    in reply to: I Worked For The State… #2158675
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    I am amazed at:
    The fixation on criminal trials, guilt and innocence by almost every poster above. In many jurisdictions there are far move civil suits heard by juries than criminal trials.
    I don’t do criminal defense work, in 40 years of an average of three jury trials per month in the CTL law firm, EVERY one has been a Civil Trial with a jury of 6 members.

    The inaccurate information posted is laughable.
    Smerel, no American judge can hold you in contempt for saying you are racist or against the American government. The ability to make those statements are protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution. The judge may personally have contempt for you, but cannot hold you in contempt and apply penalties for voicing those opinions during the voir dire process.
    UJM, the voir dire questioning is usually conducted by the attorneys, not the judge. Often the defendant is not present. You would not be able to tell the judge anything about the defendant’s looks. In fact in most voir dire proceedings you don’t get a chance to address the judge until all the acceptable members of the jury have been chosen by the attorneys. Then the judge asks the chosen group if any one of them has a reason they should not serve. The others are removed from the courtroom and that potential juror is asked why. This is done so as not to bias the other jurors. This is likely the only time in the process a potential juror may address the judge.

    When the judge introduces the case to the jury panel sent for questioning he/she typically says this trial is set to begin Tuesday the xx of xxxx, if anyone has a conflict with that please raise your hand. If only a couple of hands go up, those may be sent back to the holding room to be questioned for another trial or be excused, or told they may explain if they are chosen for the jury.

    4 years ago I raised my hand when he judge said the trial would start two days before Pesach. I was sent back to the holding room and not sent back for questioning for another case. In CT you are called for one day and if not chosen for a jury you cannot be called again For three judicial years.

    in reply to: I Worked For The State… #2158676
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @UJM
    A unanimous jury is not required in all cases.
    In some jurisdictions and types of cases 10/12 may render a decision. This usually is in civil damages cases, not criminal cases that have possible prison consequences if the defendant is found guilty.

    in reply to: I Worked For The State… #2158590
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Have I ever served on a jury? Yes, here is CT lawyers are not exempt. We are typically empaneled in the farthest end of the state from where we live or practice.
    Jurors only get paid by the state if the employer does not pay them.
    Shabbos excuse won’t get you out of most jury duty, the jury clerk will send you for voir dire examination for trials expected to start on a Tuesday and last no more thann3 days.
    Hating America or saying you are a racist is meaningless in a civil suit between white people.
    Parties to a lawsuit or a criminal defendant don’t have to make their religion known, so how do you know they are Jewish.

    We have an obligation to serve and to be an example to our children. Looking to beat the system is not what I would want my children to learn.
    Lakewhut, you exemplify shonder fir dem goyim

    in reply to: Judge fines Trump and his lawyer Alina Habba for frivolous lawsuit #2158392
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Akuperma
    The judge cannot lose on appeal.
    The judge will not be a party to the action.
    The appeal, if filed, will be DJT and Habba v. USA seeking the fine be dismissed.

    Please stop posting inaccurate legal observations and stick to your field of expertise.

    in reply to: expensive foods #2158391
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @AviraDeRah

    his point was that all the time the wealthy man wasted on becoming wealthy could have been spent learning, if he just worked enough to support his family

    This ignores inherited wealth. The rich man may have spent no time becoming wealthy.
    As good part of my practice is as a trust administrator. Some beneficiaries receive a hefty monthly income, never having to work, great grandpa or great grandma may have done that.

    As for the fancy walls and trimmings, the late Mrs. CTL was a designer builder realtor. Our home was larger and fancier than our needs, but it housed her office and served as her showroom and portfolio (almost like living over the store in generations gone by). Her potential and return clientele expected as much.
    The Litvish Yeshivish system seems to approve of women working and men learning.
    By the time her estate is settled, there will be grandchildren living in or owning fancy decorated dwellings for which they did not have to sacrifice an hour of learning to work in order to acquire them.

    I don’t pretend to know more than a Gadol, but his observations about a specific situation in a different place and time should not be applied by others who don’t know other people’s actual circumstances.

    in reply to: Different Tracks of Modern Orthodoxy #2158314
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @DaMoshe
    I agree with your post. Many in the CR have blinders in and suffer in-town myopia.
    At almost 70 years of age, I don’t a black hat or a black suit. As I posted a long time ago: the first time I appeared in court as a young attorney, an esteemed judge took me aside and advised, in this business only the judge wears black. My suits and hats are midnight blue or darkest charcoal.
    This does not make me less frum. I don’t feel out of place at a Yeshivish minyan or the annual Agudah Dinner. To be perfectly frank , they don’t care about the color of my suit or the color of my checks.

    in reply to: The Rich and Community Standards #2156990
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Gadolhadorah
    The examples you post of a bigger honor for a larger donation may be offensive, BUT is a common community standard.
    The community has decided that honors are in effect purchased. When that occurs they are no longer honors.

    This is a community standard that goes back centuries, in the words of Tevye in Fiddler on the Roof singing ‘If I were a rich man’ wealth would gain him a seat by the eastern wall in the Anatevka shul.

    When a large shul sells holiday seats, those in the fixed pews of the main sanctuary are likely to cost more than the folding chairs set up in the social hall.

    in reply to: The Rich and Community Standards #2156929
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @lakewhut
    Since you were not specific about which community standards are being violated, I replied with something I am familiar with.
    There are communities of Jews who have set dollar limits on simchas which limits families to cookie cutter packages at a few halls. That’s a standard I don’t agree with.
    I would never tolerate a family member misbehaving in Yeshiva and being excused because Zaidy writes a big check every year.

    in reply to: The Rich and Community Standards #2156700
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @lakewhut
    You are correct that the rabbis won’t admonish the rich person who puts in the over the top affair.
    #1 you don’t bite the hand that feeds you
    #2 there may have been a discussion of all the additional work and money being pumped into the community by this affair and the rabbis agree and understand that this is an economic stimulus that is better for those hired/contracted in term of self esteem than donating the additional cost to charity and having the same people helped without working
    #3 the ones being admonished may being going into debt to put on the affair, or partaking in charity distributions such as tuition assistance. The wealthy person is paying in full and subsidizing those who cannot afford to do so.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    A CTL grandson recently got engaged. The Rosh Yeshiva called him to his office and admonished him because the Kallah was given quite a large diamond that was X times the standard they have set. The grandson explained that he and his parents did not spend a single dollar for the stone. His Bubbe had died in Chodesh Elul, she had approved the choice of girl and it was one of her stones being given. The Rosh Yeshiva accepted that the stone was indeed a manifestation of Mrs. CTL’s blessing of the coming marriage. He did suggest to my grandson that he find a way to quietly mention to his closest chevrah that his Bubbe had bequeathed the engagement stone for this match to show her love and approval and kibud av v’aym in this case extended to his newly deceased grandparent and overrode the Yeshiva Standard.
    While the stone is large, the chasunah will be a simple affair as his parent will still be in the 11 month mourning period.
    BTW, he is not going to law school, he will pursue IT as he decided in consultation with me and the family members of the firm we needed our own IT person to also be in house expert on cybersecurity.

    in reply to: The Rich and Community Standards #2156578
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    To be blunt, organizations can not afford to blacklist or denigrate their benefactors.
    Sometimes putting on a lavish affair is not a matter of showing off or going above community standards, but a means of employing many more waiters, bartenders, cooks, florists, musicians, photographers and rental company employees than the proscribed affair.

    in reply to: why is everyone arrested called a suspect? #2156182
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @hashem says
    There are many reasons for arrest that may not include being a suspect.
    Some are just plain racist, such as driving while black.
    Some ‘bad’ cops make arrests to make quota (yes quotas do exist in some places).
    Some arrests are made to be vindictive or get back at someone for personal reasons.

    in reply to: Dental Insurance #2156020
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Yserbius
    It is not about affording Dental Insurance, but the fact that most dental insurance is not that good, pays little and has annual caps and exclusions.
    Our dentists have told us not to buy the insurance, but bank the amount of the premiums each year to have towards major work when needed.
    I have a Medicare Advantage plan. It added some minimal dental coverage last year. I was entitled to two cleanings and one set of Byte Wing Xrays for the calendar year. Not worth much to me.
    The Dental addon plans I was offered, would not pay for implants, and had a yearly max payout of $2000, which doesn’t cover a root canal and post without a permanent crown in my area.
    My trip for dental tourism is not on a whim, but well researched and thought out. This is not in response to a dental emergency, but something that could be postponed until convenient and affordable.

    in reply to: why is everyone arrested called a suspect? #2156018
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Always
    and my suggested headline didn’t say of the arrestee had one arm or two

    in reply to: FAA Bungled Badly #2155733
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    The secretary of Transportation does not run the day to day operations of the FAA.
    There are thousands of civil servants employed in the agency and they run the computers

    in reply to: FAA Bungled Badly #2155734
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Can you bungle goodly?

    in reply to: Dental Insurance #2155735
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Coffee Addict it is Joseph’s daughter who has spent so much time in our home.
    If it was Mrs. CTL’s grandmother who was born in Budapest it makes my son(s) UJM’s lantzman (same with my first cousins) not me.
    My maternal side is German from Bavaria, my paternal side Litvak from the Pale, all arriving in NY through Castle Garden more than 150 years ago.
    The biggest feat is that the family extends to the 7th generation born in America and still frum.


    @Gadolhadorah

    I have never posted a recipe for sweet fish or anything else sweet.
    I don’t like chocolate, ice cream or candy, give me the salty, crunchy snacks

    in reply to: why is everyone arrested called a suspect? #2155464
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Participant
    A reputable headline would read:
    “Armed man arrested in killing of 12 year old girl.”
    In means in response to the act of the girl being killed.
    No libel can be ascribed to the headline you wrote because man is generic, if it actually used the arrestee’s name and the story did not use verbiage such as alleged it may be problematic.
    Any libel action Would wait until after trial. If convicted there is no liability, as truth is always an acceptable defense to libel. There are others, and malicious intent may have to be proven in some jurisdictions. Here the intent appears to be to sell newspapers

    in reply to: Dental Insurance #2155377
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @UJM
    Mrs. CTL’s paternal grandmother was born in Budapest. An aunt of mine (by marriage) was also born there. Both made it to CT in 1938.
    The first extended visit I made to Budapest 40 years ago
    was with my aunt pursuing property claims.

    in reply to: Dental Insurance #2155276
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    I don’t have dental insurance.
    I currently need 2 implants
    It will cost about $17,000 here in Fairfield County
    But, just as there is medical tourism, there is dental tourism. I can. Get them done by excellent dentists in Budapest (where I have had dental work in the past) for about $1,500 add flight and a week’s vacation and am all in at $4300
    Already booked for March

    in reply to: why is everyone arrested called a suspect? #2155240
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Always
    You ascribe authority to the police they do not have. They make apprehensions, the magistrate or arraignment judge decides to hold or release. The DA, States Attorney or Grand Jury indicts on specific charges.

    Here in CT we don’t have DAs, our Stated Attorneys are appointed employees not elected politicians and we don’t use a grand jury system to indict. Much smoother, less political system than New York. We also still set cash bail got most who are arrested

    in reply to: why is everyone arrested called a suspect? #2155239
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Only trial and conviction can confirm the suspect is a perpetrator. Until then the arrestee/detainee is an ALLEGED perpetrator.
    Leave out that adjective and you can open yourself to slander/libel actions.
    We lawyers know to be very careful with choice of words as do journalists.

    in reply to: Speakerless #2154930
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @AAQ
    The CT court system helped facilitate WFH by requiring all filings do be done electronically. No more trips to the courthouse to file papers.
    Many court proceedings are still being held via Zoom. This saves clients loads of money. I typically bill $250 more per hours for court appearances (plus travel time) than my standard rate. Much of the day in court is wasted waiting for cases to be called, judges interrupted for motions, 90 minute lunch breaks when I can’t do other billable work, so the client pays a full day and I don’t do a full day’s work for the client, but have to be available as the judge’s clerk schedules.
    With Zoom, I can do billable work, until I hear the clerk call the case, there is no travel time to be paid by the client, no gas, parking, etc. I don’t take 90 minutes to eat, so i have another hour to work and bill another client. The first client is not stuck paying for a full day.

    We have used WFH for decades, as long as an office staff member is in the office during opening hours, the attorneys can come and go as appointments and meetings warrant. We do not have walk in trade.
    During Mrs. CTL’s long illness I did 90% of my work from my home office. I have a separate outside entrance and a few select clients could see me in person if necessary without me being unavailable for her needs.
    My daughters who work for the firm, loved being able to work from home when my grandchildren were very young and I extended that workstyle to non-family employees as well. each clerical worker chooses one half day per week to be in the office and file. Phones are often transferred to ring off premises at the office manager’s or receptionist’s home office.
    If I didn’t own our offices, I would downsize the firm’s space, but owning a fully paid and depreciated building means it is a prudent decision to remain.

    in reply to: Speakerless #2154839
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Little Froggie
    “We all…..paid NOT to work.”

    Please speak only for yourself.
    This member of the CR, who is an employer, worked all through Covid, as did his employees and allwere paid to work. No employee of the CTL firm was laid off and collected unemployment. The nature of the practice made remote work practical. Clients were serviced via, Zoom, phone, email and fax.

    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @akuperma
    This is one of the rare times I agree with what you post.
    My late FIL Z”L was an officer in the British Police during the mandate, transitioning to the Mishtara upon independence.
    We discussed this topic many times.
    Most westerners just don’t understand that European colonial rulers drew maps and established countries where none had existed. A line in a map cannot unite tribes into a country.
    In countless countries we have seen decades of civil war and genocide after independence.

    I laugh at the mention of Pakistan and Bengladesh above. Lumping two territories separated by thousands of kilometers into one country because they were to be a homeland for Muslims was a joke.

    in reply to: Speakerless #2154475
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Always
    Every time the Republicans shut down the Federal Government the shut out employees received their pay and benefits for the time not worked.
    We taxpayers will pay for this Republican circus in many ways, rest assured the Boeberts and Gaetzes will continue to line their pockets with our money

    in reply to: Speakerless #2154474
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @UJM

    Don’t give up your day job
    You have officially failed Constitutional Law
    Try READING the 25th Amendment which lays out the procedure for filling a vacancy in the VP office. The President nominates a VP and the nomination must be approved by the House and the Senate.

    This is different that Presidential appointments of Judges and Ambassadors which are confirmed solely by the Senate.

    I have taught Constitutional Law over the years as an adjunct professor. You get an F.

    in reply to: Stupid Planes #2154338
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @troll
    Good luck to you.
    I am sorry you fly on bad planes.
    That said I only book/fly in aisle seats, not interested in the curved wall of the window seat.
    I like to get up at will and stretch my legs.
    When Mrs. CTL was still alive we always booked aisle seats across from each other.
    The only time I fly seated in a window seat is when it is also an aisle seat in private planes.

    in reply to: Speakerless #2154268
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Akuperma
    Your scenario is only applicable if the President and VP die virtually simultaneously.
    Otherwise, once VP sworn in as President, nominates a new VP to be approved by both houses of Congress.

    Right now, the House has no members, so it can’t happen, but it can if there occurred a vacancy in the Speaker’s position during a session when members have been sworn in.

    in reply to: Board or bored #2153694
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Lakewoodscoop

    CTL is about 70 years old and drinking 6-8 cups of coffee a day since Bar Mitzvah: always black
    I have never experienced the issue you raise

    in reply to: Board or bored #2153589
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Cold not coke… autocorrect

    in reply to: Board or bored #2153588
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @5T
    Meat Board: charuterie
    Assorted coke cuts and cut vegetables

    in reply to: Board or bored #2153362
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @commonSaychel
    Thank you,
    I have been reading since shloshim for Mrs. CTL ended, but there has been little to actually comment upon.
    I have long made known my resistance to excess in entertaining costs, etc. Especially by those who go into debt to do so.
    This morning in shul, one of the regulars had yahrzeit for his father. After davening and the Rav’s daily vort, he put a bottle on his table, with some plastic shot glasses, opened a package of cookies and we regulars all had a drink and a cookie in his father’s memory/honor. No fish, breads, cheeses, cakes, caterer, etc. We acknowledged the occasion and went on with our day.
    This was just as meaningful as a lavish sit down breakfast, shared with the regulars who attend day in/day out, not those who find out there will be a spread and show up.

    in reply to: Board or bored #2153236
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Put out a pletzl (Onion Board) and a bottle of whiskey and fartig.

    in reply to: Trump Chia Pet #2149736
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    I would not buy anything Trump is selling (or sold) which is why I did not vote for him.

    I am not a not a Republican, neither is Trump. He is chair of the Trump first party: All for One and Trump for none.


    @yungerman

    Wishing someone dead and buried is inappropriate.
    As for your false accusations of voting from the grave, those abuses stopped decades ago.
    As a local elections official, I can say that the only votes arriving from dead people and counted were absentee ballots filled out signed and mailed before death. I know this because Mrs. CTL voted in a primary absentee and died and wax buried before the votes were counted. Absentee ballots in CT are sent out 30 days before the election by law. These votes from the grave are not fraud

    in reply to: SHIDUCHIM. #2147117
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Avira

    I can read and translate.
    The quotation does not say “proper”
    The word ‘Mutar’ as I learned it means permitted.

    Simply because something is permitted does not make it a ‘proper’ choice for everyone.

    If a charity/organization/institution needs my money gift to encourage others to give, I would rather put up a matching fund grant to stimulate donations large or small. The matching funds will be listed as coming from Aleph Bet Gimel Charitable Trust, not CTL.
    Better every dollar go to the need than to the bronze works making the plaques.

    Have you never seen a charity’s ad journal that lists a donation from anonymous? That doesn’t just mean they had blank space to fill, but some givers don’t want to be known publicly.
    Have you ever seen starter checks? They have the account number but no account owner’s name in them? I have such checks that I use for Tzedaka. I can print copies of the paid checks on line for my accounting and tax records without the recipient knowing who gave the money.

    We have quite different opinions as to the manner in which we make charitable donations. The important thing is that we make the donation. We prefer humility and privacy

    in reply to: SHIDUCHIM. #2147035
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Avira
    I did not mention money or wealth in my comment.
    The CTL compound came into existence out of necessity. Living OOT in a small town, building homes on land carved from our initial larger parcel allowed us to have a minyan in walking distance, a private eruv and a safe haven for our children and grandchildren each summer. It cost substantially less than housing and camp costs in NYC and its suburbs.
    I have repeatedly talked about doing much of the building ourselves, and still do lots of the tasks. We had 3.5 inches of snow last night and I was out with a shovel clearing the walks and driveway so I could go to minyan in time for 6:30 davening today. I wasn’t waiting on a plow service to arrive.

    As for what do we do besides give charity. Lots of volunteering in both the Jewish and community world. My daughters and granddaughters did their stints babysitting at shul and setting up the weekly kiddush and Oneg Shabbos. They also helped Mrs. CTL OBM cook many a shul dinner and deliver shiva meals. Our sons have taught afternoon Civics ad History classes (at no charge) in the local day school.
    For twenty-five years, I have run three times a year Blood drives for the American Red Cross. They are the only organization allowed to collect blood in Connecticut (you can’t go to a hospital and donate) AND, Connecticut is the ONLY state in the USA where blood is free for those who need it. Mrs. CTL needed 18 units in her final hospital stay and I am proud to have helped make sure ample blood supplies are available.

    BUT>>>>>>>>>>>>what is wrong with donating money??????????????
    Shuls, schools, hospitals need donations to keep operating. So do soup kitchens, food banks, etc. Both here and abroad, especially EY.
    I am not a doctor, I can’t treat you when you enter a hospital, BUT that Xray machine in Laniado may be one that I paid for. The local Rosh Yeshiva who is having a hard time meeting payroll or utility bills is not shy to call and request money over and above my annual contribution and I am proud to be able to help. There is little I need personally at this stage of life. All of a lifetime’s earnings and investments and generational wealth could not keep Mrs. CTL alive. Only KBH determined when her time on earth was up.
    What I can tell you is that with the exception of Yahrzeit placques you will never find the CTL name on anything that recognizes a contribution or donation.
    My father Z”L and grandfather Z”L taught us that it is in very poor taste to let people know what you give and even worse to make someone feel embarrassed that they can not give a similar amount or at all.
    I remember from the time I was a child that presents were never opened in public. If attending a birthday party, my mother would take us from the room if presents were opened in front of others.

    I don’t owe you an explanation, but your attack called for a reply

Viewing 50 posts - 301 through 350 (of 3,279 total)