Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I’m sorry to say, but Chabad has paid a very dear price for their kiruv.
Ah, you’re right.
But I still don’t think popa was literally accusing him of being Joseph, just of doing something Joseph would do.
And Rabbi Weiss is even according to his most bitter opponents a completely frum Jew, meeting the standards of a kosher eid.
Except maybe the ICR.
PAA, he gave a better, eternal reason, for which he didn’t even need to get into the metzius, so there’s no reason to think he implied anything, even if the metzius was the same.
Randomex, where do see popa accusing him of chillul Shabbos? He’s accusing him of getting too personal, as I see it.
Just call them by their screen names.
That’s it?
ZD’s profile says he’s from Queens, but yes, a couple of reports doesn’t make for anything definitive.
Also, we might be able to quantify how many participated, but I don’t see how we can possibly measure the overall impact on everyone, including the frum.
I like popa’s answer the best, but I don’t know about purporting to be the establishment.
I think there are a lot of parts and perspectives to the definition of yeshivish. I don’t think one can easily define it objectively. When asking the question “is he yeshivish?” or “how yeshivish is he”, you have to know who you are asking, and to answer in any meaningful way, you have to know who’s asking.
I don’t know.. third base!
Am I not “you”?
Why was a diff web site talking about me?
OK, LG, sorry.
Abba, wow.
LG, yes, but that’s got nothing to do with the complaints people have against the IDF.
or it could prove that the Rambam was not universally accepted
No, because they all offer an explanation consistent with the Rambam.
Well, no, but the magazine said how to contact him, so I’m curious to know how he’ll respond to you.
Also, the thrust of his article was that the changes he wishes implemented all will not have a negative impact on non shidduch related issues, rather, a positive one. If that is the case, the data is superfluous.
I will say, though, that the glaring omission is dealing with the fact that getting married a year earlier might mean a year less learning. There are answers, and I think he hints to one, but it needs to be part of the discussion.
I have never seen The Death of Klinghoffer. Does that mean I can’t criticize it?
Also, I have some cousins who served in the IDF.
Yes, that’s the one I’m referring to. My point in bringing it up was to show Charlie that he is mistaken, and the machlokes isn’t necessarily whether we pasken according to the Rambam, as the mattirim are claiming to be going according to the Rambam.
As to whether this disproves your theory, although I disagree with you, I don’t think it does. At least some of the osrim use the term “k’ilu”, meaning even they may not hold it’s actually the type of request to malachim which is prohibited, but is assur because it appears that way.
Here is the S’dei Chemed I linked earlier:
http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=43519&st=&pgnum=6&hilite=
Sam, he believes he can overrule them by claiming their values were inspired by the times they lived in. That’s practically the theme of OO, and he’s at the very least guilty by association (more than association, but that’s the term).
It was once nogeia to me to prove he’s an apikores, and I did find some statements of his which I think were over the line, but I don’t remember where.
I don’t think his point is to be an apikores, though, I think his main focus is to garner attention. It’s just not a big deal to him if hashkafos get messed up along the way.
One could describe the 13 ikkarim as a psak for mandatory beliefs.
I agree.
One should note that they were not universally accepted, even today. See… the Machnise Rachamim prayer in the Selichot service
That is an egregious error, which I’ve pointed out in the past (with sources). I don’t have time now, but after Shabbos I’ll bl”n post a link to a teshuvah in the Igros Moshe on it (which I don’t think I’ve posted yet).
Or, or, just assume there are twice as many boys as girls!
And join Avi Weiss and Zev Farber as minim who don’t believe Chaza”l!
(Actually, not a great idea, because the more people who self identify as women, the worse the disparity becomes.)
(I wasn’t there, so I don’t know)
That pretty much negates the rest of your post.
You want to leave the plane if you can’t get a seat you find acceptable? Fine, but get there early enough so you don’t cause a delay. I have absolutely no problem with that.
It seems to me (based on the article I read) that even according to the version which doesn’t claim the airline was scapegoating the chareidi passengers, the delay wasn’t the passengers request, it was the airline’s getting their luggage off.
Why should this be different?
Because now you’re asking someone else to pay. Also, it’s not a question of paying more for a chumrah; they got off the plane.
Charlie, if people had to pay $12,000 to fly, most wouldn’t fly. This might not bother you, but it bothers them, and it bothers the airline.
It’s worth noting that even buying an extra seat or buying a seat in a more expensive class does not guarantee not sitting next to a woman. Airlines overbook all the time, and reassign seats or bump passengers. I would assume that the first “passenger” to be bumped would be an empty seat.
As far as your comment that you would “would object to a person delaying a flight for 45 minutes when he/she doesn’t get his/her way”, your condescending attitude towards those with different religious standards than your own notwithstanding, this is not a childish tantrum we are talking about, these are legitimate religious sensitivities we’re dealing with. You have every right to disagree with them, but you shouldn’t be so intolerant.
Also, to reiterate, some are denying that the delay was related to mixed seating altogether, but even according to the original story, the delay wasn’t from the passengers making a fuss, it was in getting their luggage off of the plane.
What are the non mehadrin meals on Delta?
Also because your point was addressed earlier in the thread.
PAA, it all comes from frumteens (my hunch as soon as I saw that Chein is Joseph, and confirmed by Google).
Gamanit, did Haaretz do an article on it?
Nut free schools are also not okay?
Syag, do you think schools should accommodate children who are allergic to nuts by enforcing a nut-free policy, or should the kids (or parents) accommodate their own needs?
I decided not to post which part I’m skeptical about, because the women won’t understand.
There’s still one part I remain skeptical about.
FWIW, I believed almost everything you wrote in that thread.
What is this thread about?
and DaasYochid was the one whose idea it was
I sincerely apologize to everyone for that.
Insulting to the gender:
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/good-jokes#post-110921
Which gender?
(which is my point).
And seemingly against what the poskim say (despite your “lack of clarity”).
I didn’t understand that.
Must have been the female popa posting.
Also, put yourself in the following scenario: you are flying to E.Y. for about $1200. Your rav paskens that it is assur to sit next to a mam (I don’t know why you use the terms “believe” and “religious obligation” instead of “psak halacha”). You have a choice: rely in working it out amicably if you are placed next to a man as can be done 99% of the time, or pay an extra $1200 (every time you fly). What would you do?
Were you on the plane? Popa says he read that the delay was unrelated.
And I don’t believe Haaretz for a second.
I’m not sure what you are getting at
??”? ?? ??? ???…
http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=908&pgnum=167
Last paragraph.
Gavra, you are welcome to sponsor. You don’t seem to have a hard time spending others’ money.
I think most of the time it’s a non issue, because it’s worked out amicably.
I’m not sure what he would say in this case:
http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=888&pgnum=193
See end of teshuvah.
Alecha L’Havei Rayah that there is some legitimate Psak
In learning, maybe, in negatively judging those on the plane, the opposite.
P.S. If the issue is that of dress
It’s the overall situation, not one ???.
(Also, http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=1414&pgnum=165)
It should be noted that DaMoshe’s translation is not 100% faithful to the original, and the differences would make a nafka mina both l’chumra and l’kula.
And popa’s point would definitely impact the last part of the teshuvah.
I don’t know any specific poskim who argue, but R’ Moshe is admittedly going against the simple reading of the Beis Shmuel (DaMoshe didn’t quote that part).
There is definitely a case in which R’ Moshe assers (DaMoshe quoted it, albeit inaccurately) so how can anyone judge that another individual should stay??!!
Here’s the teshuvah:
http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14675&st=&pgnum=326&hilite=
DaMoshe,
Did R’ Moshe pasken one MUST sit next to a woman?
Did he pasken one is allowed no matter how she is dressed, and no matter how he feels he will be affected by it?
Does nobody disagree with R’ Moshe, and is someone not entitled to follow his own posek?
Panasonic cordless.