Joseph

Curious – I was dan lekaff zchus that you mistook today for Purim.

moish, curious got drunk at the party.

Techiyas Hameisim!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ICOT –

Just a thought that occured to me (without agreeing or disagreeing with your point), how could you be confident someone didn’t put on a show in order to eventually obtain someone’s contact information? (i.e. hey, lets go running together, or I have a great shidduch… but the ulterior motive being just to get the contact — not for the purported benefit.)

dd – That comment was made by notpashut rhetorically, with the underlying point being no one is embarrassing anyone in public – and that is a false comparison.

Also see Bemused very good point, subsequent to your comment. Somehow tough, I think bemused is giving the commentor he addressed too much benefit of the doubt.

gavra:

You said: Who knows better, the expert who knows the case and has studied the field or the Rav who does not?

tal already answered this point of yours, prior to your comment: SJS, I think you may be convincing yourself that Rabbanim respond in matters they feel they are unqualified… Rabbanim don’t speak when they are not certain… and see tal’s entire comment above.)

You said: The rav can tell her she is a Moredes if she does not go to him. Then it is her choice to go or not.

No, its not a matter of choice. If she is a moredes, she is obligated to take corrective action to ensure she is no longer moredes. (If she fails to, there are consequences. But she was still obligated to stop being a moredes.)

YU – Pidyun Shvuyim applies even if a Yid broke secular law.

oomis, you missed his point. Your “opinion” on a halachic matter is of zero value. There is nothing to be embarrased about. Both notpashut and my own “opinion” on a halachic matter is also worthless.

It is with great sadness that we announce that qwerty has departed the CR, for a better world.

Curious – Yes. I enjoy hearing it from you.

Curious – perhaps ames is married.

aha, I said you were to choose JOG.

Thank you notpashut.

squeak, you replied to Will Hill the other day, to a post that didn’t exist.

knowing you, JOG should be it.

squeak you’ve expressed yourself repeatedly in the past 24 hours how the mods haven’t been approving your posts. Seems like you need eradicate some knowledge.

BOW

SJS, without repeating the wording, I question if you were able to maintain full halachic standards while you had a bf.

(Hopefully this will pass muster.)

SJS – Where you ***Deleted*** Inappropriate question. YW Moderator-72

squeak, why are/were you using IE?

moish01 said: What’s your pet peeve?

I think my worst one is when a moderator comes on, approves one or two posts and then LEAVES without updating all the threads. I mean, I understand if they’re busy but it’s such a tease!

I agree moish is making a valid point. Clearly the mods can come and go as they please. But I think it would be a very good idea to post comments in the order received — otherwise it becomes very difficult for readers to follow a thread. If an older post is approved after readers already say newer posts on the thread, most people will not realize there are new posts (that are older than some they already read) and miss it — since they recall the last message they read, and don’t look for older messages in the thread – assuming they read all loder messages already.

gavra, areivim was probably humorously referring to “Guess you could go and pretend you were not davening, and hide a siddur inside a sefer!”

Jay – if the phone can access any site.

http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/shloimele-zl

gavra: http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/daveing-with-crocs/