Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Now I am curious to know what Sam2 wrote..
Its silly to think that she will ever be impeached for this, yet it just shows all that she is above the law and no one will do anything to her even if they themselves explain that what she did was wrong.
Charlie,
the outcome does not make it right, the fact that there were no leaks (that we are currently aware of) does not mean that this is a nonissue.
even the in his statement, the FBI director had a lot of negative things to say about what Hillary did, so much that it is left to wonder why she is not prosecuted.
No one has ever used the small C as an excuse of not realizing that this is not confidential, what Hillary repeatedly said was that what she did was legal and there were no emails that were marked confidential at the time.
despite it only being a small number of emails, each of these emails have email chains and we now know that what she did was careless and against the rules.
Rebyid, Google has other definitions for the word attractive, but I believe the more accurate description
Would be provocative.
No one is saying women should dress ugly, only normal. Of course everyone’s normal is different, but provocative looking sheitls are a problem.
non attractive does not mean ugly. there is an in between something that does not attract yet is nice and decent.
Disagree, political correct means hurting someone while wearing white gloves.
In fact, Hillary has been corrupt there is no one that is denying it. she lied about the emails as has been pointed out by the FBI that stated that there were emails marked classified at the time.
The current email scandal that shows how the DNC was working against Bernie, it’s without any doubt that they were not doing this on their own, no one is denying any of this.
To a lot of people, when putting Hillary side by side with Trump she is viewed as the dishonest and crooked person and trump the non-politically correct and straightforward get-it-done kind of person.
It seems like you are clinging to some comments of his comments yet not to his policies. True, he might not be politically correct and might not be polite at times.
But at least he has some things right, we sold out our country to China, not too long ago there were huge plants manufacturing goods here in the USA, actually here in the tri-state, we essentially made it easy and cheaper to import and harder if not impossible to manufacture.
we became a country of services instead of manufacturing. this makes no sense at all and catastrophic to many people.
I do understand that it’s not just the democrats that are to blame for this, Bush had a big hand in this, however, this is a huge issue and he is willing to deal with it.
So what if Hillary is more politically correct and watches what she says.
No one publicly disputed the photo, only attacked trump about it, as I noted they ran right into his trap.
Not sure why you are changing the discussion about comments he made. But btw I think he has a point, a hero is not someone that was captured.. It’s someone that has done something heroic.
Same with Hillary, you truly believes she stands for the things she says??
Standard politics.
Actually, I think he made a great point and he is great at laying traps like these for the media.
Trump says something in a tone that might sound like he is suggesting more then he is actually saying, some jump on this and call him out on it, he then uses this opportunity to undermine those that are calling him out.
He nicely explained that it’s not him that suggested that Cruz’s dad assassinated JFK, only that there is a photo of him having breakfast with JFks assassin.
He then asks, why can’t we talk about this? is the photo not of Cruz’s dad?
Why would anyone think that it is not appropriate to discuss these people, they went on to the show knowingly that this will be a TV show, they for sure knew that they even might be portrayed as fools, the producers can decide whatever they want.
truth to be said, its a reality show they show only what they want to show, they edit it which ever way they want.
its all about what makes good TV
what in the world were they thinking, they will get through with some beat boxing??
he finally realized that attention, any attention is good even if it is negative.
Papa requested it.
Feivel,
Sorry if you mentioned this earlier, are there any vaccines that you believe that should be mandatory?
Some vaccines can wait while others put the child at unnecessary risk such as the pertussis vaccines.
Physicians treat patients not symptoms, if you do not like the way your pediatrician manages your child’s health care, such as believing in vaccinations feel free to switch over to a different pediatrician.
On the other hand, if you have a different belief on how your child’s health care should be managed then your pediatrician, your pediatrician has the right to exclude your child from their practice. Although it would be appropriate for your pediatrician to sit down and explain to you on why they believe in vaccinating children (as the CDC recommends doing) rather then just excluding the child from the practice.
Most pediatricians I have bumped into are pretty reasonable, they usually agree in delaying vaccinations or giving them more spread apart.
Also, there were some very reasonable posters with valid and reasonable concerns with regards to the current vaccination recommendations, however this is not the thinking of the main stream anti vaxxers, they are full of conspiracy theories and non sense.
147, Curious is it because of the sugar content of grape juice or something else.
Please dont respond if you dont want to..
This IS a Halacha question and needs the psak of someone that is qualified to pasken.
Also, doing your own research is a great way to keep yourself informed, do NOT rely on any online sites for diagnosis and treatment.
Pomona is less of a community than Monsey. Yes there are Jews but they are sprinkled around on each block living among Non Jews, nothing wrong with that, but wouldn’t really call Pomona a community.
Could be I do not know enough about you or the situation at hand or what is considered an appropriate relationship in your circles to even make a bystander comment, but you having non Jewish friends or taking rides with non Jewish Girls is no where the same as you befriending a boy that is in what you call a sad situation.
The risk of him pulling you over to his ‘sad’ situation is probably greater than you being able to change him.
I am in no position to really advise you on such sensitive subjects, however from the limited amount of information you posted you mentioned that this boy goes out with non jewish girls, yet you are for some reason convinced that you befriending him would draw him away from those girls and closer to yiddishkeit.
now who says that you wont be drawn closer to his life, for me it appears that the risks outweight the benefits.
In fact being between people, its more likely that you will be pulled into his world then the other way around.
If you learn Hilchas Tefilin, you will see that both shitos are mentioned by the Geonim, it predates Rashi and R”T.
Trump is brilliant, he gets free advertising just stirs up some controversy and everyone reads about him, No day goes by without him being in the news, whatever they write positive or negative as long as he is discussed he is getting publicity and its helping him.
not sure why my post is marked as edited. I dont think I wrote anything other than what is posted.
I edited out the insult.
Of course no one hired you to teach medicine and based on what you write no one will ever do that!
edited
Looking forward to what spin?! Is it the one sentence you will find someplace in a google search on the 100th page?
Or you mean spin on something you found in an EMT book like Trauma are there medical causes?
Anyways, a Gut Vuch and take life easy
Mr Health,
Your the only one here calling themselves a medical professional, we were just calling you out on your ignorance, not using this in any way as a step ladder or claim on having any medical degree.
Your head is so wrapped around this online profile of yours claiming to be a medical provider and attacking anyone that questions or asks what type of provider you are. Yet you do not have any basic understanding on how medicine is practiced or medical research is done. You are fooling no one but yourself.
There is no point in discussing anything with someone that will never admit that they were wrong and that always will have the last word.
Health is not even good at twisting the facts and the literature in his favor in fact he doesnt even point to the places where one would research emergency medicine data.
This from a former insider?
You always have the choice not click on this thread, there are many threads that focus on topics such as latke recipes or shidduchim issues.
Are you for real?!
Give sugar for a comatose trauma patient? I guess TBI is of no concern to you?!
Unresponsive Trauma patients do not come in to the ER with Dextrose bags hanging or with narcan on board. In fact there is no coma protocol in EMS (at least NY and the surrounding states) EMS should assess and if they find a problem refer to the appropriate protocol as a guideline and treat accordingly.
All changes if there is an indication or detailed assessment (which should be done in route to the trauma center) reveals underlying medical issues. Then again, EMS should not administer Narcan for the comatose patient that has a patent airway and is spontaneously breathing, there is nothing wrong with an overdosed patient that is sleeping, but the same cannot be said with the patient that has internal injuries or massive brain trauma that can only be corrected in the OR.
The more you post, the more evident it is that you are very unfamiliar with the entire preshopital and in hospital emergency medicine approach.
I think that this thread is a very important thread, when someone establishes themselves as a medical provider and provides medical advice it is very important to expose them for who they really are.
Its one thing to have an informative discussion (which I dont think this blog is made for, there are a lot of other blogs in which cases are presented and debated geared towards people involved in medicine) yet dangerous when one has an online persona as a medical authority so whatever they write should be accepted at face value.
If there is any reason to believe that the cause and underlying issue is medical, pt would be treated medically. That goes for opiod suspicion with respiratory depression and for example seizures.
As I mentioned, trauma is not an illness (there are rare condition and syndromes that are the exception) there should always be a suspicion of an underlying medical. Especially if the presentation does not fit the mechanism of injury. No one should be a cookbook provider, each and every patient is different and so is each scenario. EMS always looks for clues they are like the eyes and ears of the ER and play detective in trying to put together the puzzle. The trauma team relies a lot on the information the first responders have.
The entire note that EMS should change what they are doing is wrong, EMS now days follow evidence based medicine, gone are the days they did stuff that made sense. Its all based on the data at hand. so when someone comes and makes the claim that he is someone with medical credentials yet undermines the entire system, shows who he really is NOT.
Also, it’s important to point out, in an MCI it’s one patient per crew the care the pt gets is the same in a single car mva as would be in an MCI.
So for those that claim to be knowledgeable enough to teach others.. And wrongly pointed out that by a multi car accident there will be to many patients to be able to focus on possible Medicals, resources are based on the need and most ems systems can manage to have multiple crews if needed
Rebyidd, reminding you to always make sure the patient is not allergic to the hair before applying it.
Btw, whoever mentioned narcan for AMS, really doesnt know emergency medicine, assuming that the only presenting medical is AMS the patient should NOT get narcan, as long as the patient as a patent airway and spontaneously breathing with no cardiovascular compromise.
Now if that same trauma patient is not breathing, please dont reach for the narcan, just secure the airway as the distraction and the time wasted for the drug administration might waste precious minutes, instead make sure the trauma team has been notified and do rapid transport.
Further more, the patient that is apneic from opoids (hence the narcan you mentioned) would first have an altered mental status and would have crashed their car much sooner.
Before you start lecturing others on your anecdotal findings make sure you know what your talking about, its never to late to begin med school.. As I pointed out previously, emergency medicine is (hopefully) not your specialty.
ubiquitin, you already made your point, you really think Mr Health will admit that he was incorrect?
It’s apparent from his posting that he will never retract, defend his so called degree in medicine and make sure to have the last word.
What would you do if you witnessed someone ‘bump’ someone else’s bumper and left a dent in the other persons car.
Assuming that you can do more than just tell, like have footage of the bumping incident.
What if the person that bumped the car was a driver, and he might lose his job if this came to light?
Should you just move on with your day or get involved and contact the owner of the car that has been bumped?
Before I throw in the towel I will post this very last response.
Mr Health, you are a big fool! since you are using personal insults as a response, you have no clue who I am or if I have any degree in medicine. So to answer your question, Why I think that you have no experience in emergency medicine, that is because you have established a fact, pushed everyone to the ground and resorted to personal insults YET ARE UNABLE TO SIMPLY POINT TO THE SOURCE!!
Just in case you are interested, MVAs (single and Multi car MVAs) are all included in the Trauma category, as with all trauma Pts the providers should (if appropriate) rule out any possible medical causes. this has nothing to do with your statement of a single car accident.
In no way does a single car accident require one to do more of a medical assessment than a multi car accident would. Trauma is trauma, every trauma has something that caused it as the trauma itself is not an illness (with rare exceptions), therefore all providers should look for possible medical causes, regardless of the type of MVA. The argument that with multi car accidents one patient might have the medical problem and the other one is the one that got hit, changes nothing in assessment.
One last thing, since you seem to have missed it from my previous post, please stop sending people to previous posts, if you have something to respond just write it.
Have a happy Chanukah.
Health,
From your posts its noticeable that you are not experienced in emergency medicine.
The fact that you found a sentence in some EMT book stating, Trauma are there medical causes, has nothing to do with an MVA and of course not with a single car MVA vs multi car.
One last thing, when responding to a post, dont send me to a previous post or other page, if you take the time and energy to respond to every little post questioning your credentials or statements, please respond with actual substance.
So its about believing you?! your own anecdotal results?
EMS responds to MVAs on a regular basis I hope they dont use this blog for medical practices. You posed a question tried to appear superior and push everyone down. your response was go research it.
In medicine they say not always is more better, same here the more you post the more it shows that your not what you say you are.
Claiming that you are in medicine, you should know that we do not follow anecdotal evidence rather evidenced based medicine.
Not sure why it took you so long to just respond and say that its your own thought especially when your initial response was go research it..
There would be a huge difference, between a one car MVA with just one pt than with multiple cars.
If there are a lot of pts, it would be an MCI, assessment and treatment are much different, the unresponsive traumatic arrest pt in a one pt MVA would get treated, in an MCI that pt would be tagged Black and not be treated as well.
Yes, source to your claim.
Its ridiculous that Health challenges everyone even goes so far as to ask posters their affiliation or medical degree.
really?! You put out a statement people question you, all you can do is make them reveal a personal detail, as if I tell you Im an emergency medicine physician you would believe me. Its the substance that matters.
True Popa,
Especially when the main factor of your argument is that YOU know, you dont provide the data or sources. Your rebuttal is go research it..
Mr Health, the probability is your own logic, is there any studies or assessment protocols that state this?
No difference, the EMS protocols in NY and surrounding states make no differentiation between single or multi car MVA, same is with the in hospital trauma assessments.
However it could very much be that more single car crashes are the result of an underlying medical, yet this does not make any two car MVA to be excluded from this suspicion.