Avi K

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 551 through 600 (of 3,494 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BTL #1744064
    Avi K
    Participant

    Neville, every thread in the CR is an argument thread.

    in reply to: Yiddish at Siyum hashas #1744039
    Avi K
    Participant

    What about Sephardim and Eidot haMizrach? Our common historical language is Hebrew. Yiddish is at most a creole German, maybe not even a language but a dialect. In fact, it was known as Jargon.

    in reply to: BTL #1743852
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTL, maybe you should hire an English major. It is incorrect to use “who” in reference to a thing (“government agency (DA, etc) who uses tax dollars to underwrite your cost”). If all government agencies do this it should be a comma followed by “which”. If not no comma and “that”. BTW, those government agencies require a three-year commitment. I would imagine that larger firms and corporate legal departments also hire people before passing the bar exam. That is why they send recruiters to law schools.

    in reply to: Is Israel part of galus? #1743850
    Avi K
    Participant

    There is a type of tamei bird that is called a ro’eh because he sits in chutz la’aretz and sees a neveila in EY (Chullin 63b). The Kotzker says that nothing is more tamei than that.

    in reply to: Are you makpid on ע ? #1743773
    Avi K
    Participant

    Besalel, it is most likely that every tribe had its own pronunciation as with other languages (e.g. Boston and NY accents). We know for a fact that Ephraimites pronounced the shin like a samech. It seems that during the time of the Tannaim there was a difference between Judea and the Galil as Beruria knew immediately that Rabbi Yossi haGlili was from there (Eruvin 53b). In later periods there were places where people did not differentiate between ח and ה or א and ע (Megilla 24b).

    in reply to: Is Israel part of galus? #1743455
    Avi K
    Participant

    Charlie, did you read my entire post? I wrote that any leader elected by the people can be in place of a king.

    in reply to: Is Israel part of galus? #1743193
    Avi K
    Participant

    Galut (exile) is the situation of living outside of one’s land. Thus, by definition a Jew living in Eretz Yisrael is not in galut, at least not physically. Those chareidim and leftists who do not understand the meaning of having a state are in spiritual galut. There are, however, level of geula as the Yerushalmi (Berachot 1:1) states. First we have to have a king (or any leader elected by the people as stated by Rav Kook in Mishpatei Cohen 144 and see also He’emek Devar on Devarim 17:14). Then he has to wipe out Amalek (according to Rav Chaim Soloveichik antisemitism) and then he has to build the Beit haMikdash (Rambam, Hilchot Melachim 1:1).

    in reply to: NYC needs a mayor! #1743210
    Avi K
    Participant

    Charlie, how is being a strong supporter of Israel a qualification for mayor?
    Crime rates have been plummeting since Giuliani cleaned up the city. Now that DeBlasio is reversing course they will eventually go back up. Not to mention his fiscal irresponsibility and war against the specialized schools.

    in reply to: BTL #1743211
    Avi K
    Participant

    The main consideration for law schools is the LSAT score. A BTL could mean that the person has superior analytic ability. It could also be a factor in a school that wants a diverse student body so far as majors are concerned. Firms mainly look at the law school and the person’s record there.

    in reply to: NYC needs a mayor! #1742958
    Avi K
    Participant

    RY, why don’t you apply two years down the road?

    in reply to: Is Israel part of galus? #1742800
    Avi K
    Participant

    Israel is by definition not part of the galut. Of course, there are some people whose souls are in galut even though their bodies are in Israel. Those who do not want to be part of the IDF, for example. If they get bad enough the Land expels them.

    in reply to: Slavery in NY School? #1742403
    Avi K
    Participant

    RY, if sports teams can why not schools?

    in reply to: Specialized Rabbis #1742404
    Avi K
    Participant

    Unommin, don’t give up your day job.

    in reply to: Are you makpid on ע ? #1741829
    Avi K
    Participant

    Anyone who is not makpid on the ע in keriat shema says apikorsut. He says השם נשבה לאבותינו, which means that He was captured c”v. Similarly, those who pronounce the chaf like the kaf say that Hashem destroys the world out of chesed c”v. On the other hand. those who overcompensate say that געל ישראל instead of גאל ישראל, which is also very bad.

    As for the צ, it is clear that at one time it was similar to the “s” sound as the word for stadium in אצטדיון (the א was due to the fact that they could not pronounce a sheva nach at the beginning of a word (Arabs also often do this). Apparently Ashkenazim did not change their pronunciation until later as one of the Baalei Tosafot is
    רבי אליעזר ממץ. In French the name of the city is pronounced with a long “s” (you can hear it by going into the Wikipedia article on the city).

    Regarding picking up sounds from other languages, it is clear that pronouncing the cholem “oy” or a long “o” (e.g. kosher) comes from Slavic influences. Pronouncing it like an “i” comes from the German ü.

    in reply to: “Eretz” Yisroel = Frummer? #1740072
    Avi K
    Participant

    KJ,

    1. David haMelech disagrees with you. When he ran away to Gatt he said that he was expelled from Hashem’s inheritance (Shmuel Alef 26:19). Chazal also disagree with you. The first mishna in Gittin gives the northern border as Acco. The former was because Gatt was not part of Shaul’s kingdom and the latter because it was the border of Jewish settlement. Rabbi Menachem Leibtag has an online analysis entitled Masei: The Borders of the Land of Israel/

    2. The Golan is part of Ever haYarden. Eilat is near Etzion Geber, which was conquered by Shlomo haMelech and again by the IDF. Both were kibbushei rabbim.

    3. It is not correct to call a state as the Land of ——. One does not, for example, call France the Land of the French. The term Medinat Yisrael was chosen to signify that the state belongs to all Jews.

    in reply to: Does a convert adopted by frum parents have a bashert? #1739543
    Avi K
    Participant

    Klugeryid, on June 5, 2019 9:06 am at 9:06 am you asked “Do the thousands of unmarried girls have basherts? How about the thousands of unmarried boys?”

    They rejected their basherts. The Steipler, in fact, told this to someone who asked where his was.

    in reply to: Does a convert adopted by frum parents have a bashert? #1738576
    Avi K
    Participant

    Klugeryid, people have free choice. That includes rejecting one’s bashert.

    in reply to: La Croix #1738283
    Avi K
    Participant

    Get it while you can. It’s having trouble competing with good, old-fashioned seltzer.

    in reply to: Does a convert adopted by frum parents have a bashert? #1738282
    Avi K
    Participant

    A true ger was born with a Jewish neshama. The fact that he is legally a new person (for most things – he still has to repay his creditors and his debtors still have to pay him) does not necessarily come into effect. It could also be that he loses his zivug rishon (who says that non-Jews do not have zivugim?) and gets a zivug sheni.

    in reply to: Historical Record #1737585
    Avi K
    Participant

    The trauma over the Churban and mass destruction of the Jewish communities in Judea caused people to forget many details. This si why in the end Rebbe had to write down the mishnayot.

    in reply to: La Croix #1737586
    Avi K
    Participant

    Are you referring to the French Catholic newspaper or a brand of sparkling water?

    in reply to: Is English Holy??? #1736934
    Avi K
    Participant

    Klugeryid, the Jews who lived in England before the expulsion came with William the Conqueror. Thus they almost certainly spoke Norman French, which was also the language of the aristocracy (William wiped out the Anglo-Saxon aristocracy so that the common people would have no leadership) and the law courts until after the time that the Jews were expelled.

    in reply to: The Institutionally Anti-Semitic Democrat Party #1736291
    Avi K
    Participant

    OOPs. I confused him with Engel.

    in reply to: The Institutionally Anti-Semitic Democrat Party #1736290
    Avi K
    Participant

    Charlie, are you sure it is Orthodox. The non-resident of the district married a non-Jew (OK so she had a deformed “conversion”).

    in reply to: YiddishKite Under Attack!!! #1736289
    Avi K
    Participant

    Is YiddishKite something you fly?

    in reply to: U.S. government #1735980
    Avi K
    Participant

    Neville, actually it is 3.25%. the idea is to give minorities a say and the possibility of defending their interests. This is also a form of democracy and exists in some European countries. There are also some countries where one house of the legislature is elected by proportional representation and one by the winner-take-all method (which means that 49.9% of the voters might be disenfranchised and encourages gerrymandering).

    in reply to: Unreasonable democrats #1735979
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTL, you are correct. The GOP has consistently been against slavery. It doesn’t matter if they masters are plantation owners or leftist bureaucrats.

    in reply to: Unreasonable democrats #1735745
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTL,
    1. Andrew Johnson was elected VP in 1864. Lincoln’s first VP was Hannibal Hamlin of Maine.
    2. The GOP did not spend Johnson’s entire term trying to impeach him. He was not impeached until 1868. After that there were no more moves to impeach him. Giving him trouble is another matter. That is part of the system of checks and balances.

    in reply to: U.S. government #1735710
    Avi K
    Participant

    The American government was supposed to represent the Aristotelian ideal of a combination of democracy (the House), oligarchy (the Senate – which was originally chosen by the state legislatures) and monarchy (POTUS). It has the advantage of stability but the disadvantage of a very unpopular POTUS staying until the end of his term (although the Congress can thwart him by refusing to pass his legislation and overriding his vetoes).

    in reply to: Unreasonable democrats #1735708
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTL, you should go back. Lincoln’s first VP was Hannibal Hamlin of Maine. AJ was his running mate when he run for re-election. Moreover, back then the GOP was the more liberal party and those who wanted impeachment (as well as a hard line towards the South) were called radical Republicans. At that time the VP was not considered to be an assistant POTUS but mainly the person who presided over the Senate. In fact, it was not clear who would succeed William Henry Harrison. John Tyler decided by himself although some thought that he should be called “Acting President”.

    in reply to: U.S. government #1735709
    Avi K
    Participant

    Lucy, please learn proper English. It is “than”.

    CTL, in some parliamentary systems there is no President. There is a monarch who serves as head of state. In France the President (currently Macron) has much more power than the PM – whom he appoints.

    in reply to: Is Star Wars Kosher? #1733905
    Avi K
    Participant

    C A, DV was a talmid who delved to deeply into the Force and was trapped by the Dark (Other) Side. It would be interesting to know if there was others. Perhaps one died and another went insane.

    Yserbius, Obi-Wan Kenobi describes the Force as “an energy field created by all living things” in Star Wars. In The Phantom Menace, Qui-Gon Jinn says microscopic lifeforms called midi-chlorians, which exist inside all living cells, allow some characters to be Force-sensitive; characters must have a high enough midi-chlorian count to feel and use the Force [Wikipedia]. This sounds like a scientific principle to me.

    in reply to: Is Star Wars Kosher? #1733901
    Avi K
    Participant

    Mod, why did you delete my comment about Elisha ben Abuya? Is not discussing him a new chumra?

    in reply to: Predictions for 2020 #1732900
    Avi K
    Participant

    Every Democrat in the US will enter the primaries and all the dirt from kindergarten will be aired (e.g. Ploni threw a crayon at a girl – incipient misogyny). They will also play “Can You Top This” a.k.a. “Mirror, mirror on the wall. Who is the biggest leftist of them all?”. Trump will win in a landslide, the DP will disintegrate and Pence/Haley will win in 2024.

    in reply to: Democrats poll #1731161
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTL,
    1. Maybe your committee agreed but nobody else did – including the candidates who will probably multiply in the coming year.
    2. I just saw an article in The Hill predicting that more leftist Dems in the House will push for impeachment. This will create a media circus with a boomerang effect.
    3. You have not responded to my contention that the candidates will be goaded into staking out positions further and further to the left. This will scare moderate voters into Trump’s camp. The same thing happened in 2016. Hillary was ahead by ten points in the polls until she made a speech in which she declared war on religious freedom. This was even too much for The Washington Post

    in reply to: Democrats poll #1730851
    Avi K
    Participant

    RY, what would you say is a smart insult? I heard from one of his talmidim that Rav Gustman said that in Grodno one could hurl any insult on one’s chevruta except “baal bayit”.

    in reply to: Democrats poll #1729913
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTL,
    1. Refua sheleima.
    2. I predict that each Democrat will find something wrong another did in elementary school and/or so much try to stake out an even more Leftist position (now that Fake Pocahontas is calling for reparations for blacks someone will have to offer the country back to descendants of the original inhabitants) that Trump will win in landslide and the DP will go the way of the Whig Party.

    in reply to: Define tzioni. #1729233
    Avi K
    Participant

    LOTR, a Zionist is someone who subscribes to Jewish Nationalism. He supports the State of Israel while disagreeing, sometimes strongly, with some government policies. He should also at least want to make aliya as soon as possible. He does not fight with Chareidim. Some of them fight but they are just proving how much they should enlist in the IDF.

    Laskern, he was a descendant of the Tzanzer Rebbe. Rabbi Abahu says (Chulin 63b) that the ראה (a type of hawk) is called that because he sits in Bavel and sees a נבלה in EY. The Tzanzer says that there is nothing more unclean than that.

    in reply to: Democrats poll #1728726
    Avi K
    Participant

    Sam, Hashem wants us to be His partner. That is why He made wheat grow and not bread.

    in reply to: Who is RGP ? #1727872
    Avi K
    Participant

    Klugeryid, your screen name must be sage nahor. First of all, a screen name has nothing to do with context. Do you think that Joseph, for example, always writes about people named Joseph? I presume that RG is the wife of a rabbi named Golden (or considers him to be a rabbi).

    in reply to: Sports #1727750
    Avi K
    Participant

    RY, why not? In high school I took a course called the History and Development of Science. Several books have been written about famous scientists and mathematicians. Einstein’s letters are sold at auction for millions.

    in reply to: Who is RGP ? #1727749
    Avi K
    Participant

    There is no RGP. She is RG and she is looking for a better screen name, Apparently I have to post this four hundred times.

    in reply to: Did Rebbitzin Golden Pick Sponsor an Article Just to Troll? #1727181
    Avi K
    Participant

    Neville,
    1. Actually she is RG. “Pick a better screen name” is an addition.
    2. I was referring to Chazal’s dictum כל הפוסל במומו פוסל.

    in reply to: Did Rebbitzin Golden Pick Sponsor an Article Just to Troll? #1726834
    Avi K
    Participant

    Neville, if you read her screen name carefully you will see that she is Rebbetzin Golden. She also challenges us (or herself) to pick a better screen name. Now you tell us. Is this thread trolling?

    in reply to: Sports #1726835
    Avi K
    Participant

    Rav Kahane said that the big test of emuna was going to a double header at Yankee Stadium and knowing that you can’t eat the franks. Now it is not true. I even saw a picture of the bassari stand with a sign “Chassidishe shechita”.

    I cannot answer better than Rav Nota Schiller. Pook chazi.

    in reply to: Kol Salonika #1725579
    Avi K
    Participant

    At one time the Jews were so dominant in Solonika that the port was closed on Shabbat. It was also the temporary home of Rav Yosef Caro before he made aliya. Almost the entire community was murdered in Auschwitz.

    in reply to: Hallel with Bracha on YH? #1724821
    Avi K
    Participant

    Charlie,

    RO’s pesak was only for those Sephardim who don’t say a beracha when it’s a minhag (some say לקרוא את ההלל and לגמור את ההלל on the הלל שלם). RG, on the other hand, considered it a combination of Torah and rabbinic obligation in accordance with the Chatam Sofer (Orach Chaim 208) who writes:
    “Commemorating the miracles which saved us from death which occurred on Purim, Chanuka, and the days enumerated in the Megillat Ta’anit is certainly mi-de’oraita… However, the quality and amount of commemoration is mi-derabbanan.”

    For a general discussion see Yom Ha-Atzmaut and Yom Yerushalayim by Rav David Brofsky on the website of Yeshivat Har Etzion (from which the above quote was taken).

    in reply to: Building a Mansion #1724282
    Avi K
    Participant

    CTL,
    1. Liberals want to tax. Socialists want to take away but still have free elections. It does not matter how they do it. As Daniel Webster and John Marshall said in McCulloch v. Maryland</em? the unlimited power to tax is the power to destroy.
    2. Actually there are several like her. They are the future (or end) of the Democratic Party. Joe Biden is the Great Moderate Hope and he will be a couple of weeks short of 78 on Election Day 2020. Nancy Pelosi is 78 and Dianne Feinstein is just short of 76.

    in reply to: Building a Mansion #1724016
    Avi K
    Participant

    Apushatayid, the CS and others I cited seem to not like buying sturdy homes in shmutz la’aretz in general. From what I know of Jewish history I would imagine though that luxurious homes for them (and certainly in Radin – the CC also condemns luxurious living and says that it leads to cheating in business and worse to keep up when times turn tough) were not very big. I know someone whose parents made aliya from the Carpathian region (I think that he was also born there but came a small child), He described their description of the town as “a hole”.

    in reply to: Building a Mansion #1723391
    Avi K
    Participant

    Apushatayid and Funnybone, I thought that expressing disapproval of other people’s actions is the purpose of the CR. As for tzarut ayin, would you say that the Chatam Sofer had that characteristic? I still have not found the exact location of the teshuva but I did find that The Shela Hakadosh, writes (at the end of Masechet Sukkah): “I willThe Shela Hakadosh, writes (at the end of Masechet Sukkah) “The Shela Hakadosh, writes (at the end of Masechet Sukkah): “I will
    disclose something that has always troubled me greatly. I have seen Jews building homes like the fortresses of princes, making themselves permanent, these worldly dwellings in impure lands. (I have observed that) it is their intention to leave these homes as an inheritance to their children after them! This appears to be, Gd forbid, an abandonment of the idea of geula. Therefore, even if Gd gives you wealth, build simple houses, to accommodate your bare worldly dwellings in impure lands.”
    The Keli Yakar, as well, says on Bereishis 47: “Many are the ignorant Jews who settle in the lands of other nations. They build themselves splendid, secure houses – homes built of stone, buildings meant to
    endure. For this reason, they never turn to Hashem with all their hearts to ask that He return them to their Land. Therefore, the Almighty leaves them there.”

    Anyway, I’m the conservative Republican who believes in property rights. Democrats like AOC would take away CTL’s house and give it to seventeen illegal immigrant families.

Viewing 50 posts - 551 through 600 (of 3,494 total)