Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Avram in MDParticipant
zahavasdad,
People jump off the GW Bridge all the time, Getting stuck in traffic right before traffic also happens all the time on Fridays. And I also belive many people in the same circumstance would do the same thing
I actually don’t think that either story (missing kid “Mincha Service” at a football game and the GW Bridge Shabbos divers) is true, although for the sake of the discussion here it doesn’t really matter, since both stories reflect basic themes that are true. They may well have been based on true stories with details that got changed or exaggerated over time with the retelling.
1. Reporting a missing kid would result in a search and police response, not just a loudspeaker announcement (would a little kid be able to find his way to “Section 301, left side”?), and subsequently big trouble for the guy who reported what turned out to be a fabrication. If such a thing were actually done, it would have been a request to locate an adult who got separated from his party.
2. When you originally presented the story, you said the guy was driving into Manhattan from Teaneck, but the version in the link you provided had the guy driving out of the City to the Catskills.
3. Given a stopped car with flashers on, I would think the most likely conclusion would be that the car was abandoned due to malfunction. Would police really send divers into the cold river without a witness to the jump, a suicide note, or any other indication? How would they even know where in the river to search?
4. Would the police really be instantly angry when someone turned out not to be dead?
Avram in MDParticipantAbsolutely.
Avram in MDParticipantSyag Lchochma,
And the fact that some of you are brushing this off without being disturbed by the sheker and geneivas daas issues is both horrifying to me and says a lot about how you live your lives. [emphasis mine]
What does it say, and what do you mean?
Avram in MDParticipantzahavasdad,
Reminds me of a story I once heard, A guy was going from Teaneck to Washington Heights Friday afternoon and was delayed. Shabbos arrived and he was stuck on the George Washington Bridge and he pulled over and walked from there. The Port Authority police seeing an abandoned car on the middle of the bridge though it was a bridge jumper and sent out divers to find him (endagering their lives). he found this out when he tried to retrieve his car from the pound
Do you believe the man in this story was also a rasha?
Avram in MDParticipantcoffee addict,
That guy is a self centered rasha
I found the story to be very funny, but in the context that I don’t believe it actually happened. If it did happen in real life, I would think the person would also believe that he was being “funny”, and not really cognizant of the consequences or maliciously deceitful. So thoughtless, yes. Stupid? Yes. Self centered? Probably. But a rasha? I doubt it.
November 12, 2015 5:32 pm at 5:32 pm in reply to: Wife put houseplants in the chicken soup–WWYD #1111436Avram in MDParticipantIf popa_bar_abba’s wife grew things like parsley as her houseplants, then it wouldn’t be so weird. And if the plant spent its entire life cycle indoors, then perhaps it didn’t need checking?
Avram in MDParticipantVienna,
I understand from all the comments that the leaders are against it and it’s not traditional,
As skripka noted above, the ordination of women is not the only issue that led to the kol korei.
but does anyone think there’s anything inherently wrong with having a female Rav? If so, what? Why can’t a woman speak Torah from the bimah?
If the primary role of a rabbi was to speak Torah from the bimah, then assuming there was a way around any issues of tznius, perhaps there wouldn’t be any further serious problems with a woman being a rabbi. Orthodox women give lectures and shiurim all of the time. The thing is, that’s not the main purpose of a rabbi.
Perhaps the most important role of a rabbi is to serve as a dayan: a judge who sits as part of a beis din to rule on matters of halacha. According to halacha, a dayan must be male, so to appoint a woman as a rabbi doesn’t really make sense. So when Open Orthodoxy ordains women, they are doing either or both of the following: 1. Altering halacha to permit women to be judges, and/or 2. Altering what a rabbi is. From an Orthodox standpoint, where halacha is our lifeblood, and the arbiters of halacha are rabbis, such actions are regarded as highly dangerous.
Personally, this reminds me of Jackie Robinson and baseball. At first everyone said black people would ruin baseball, but then everyone just shrugged and accepted it.
I think the comparison of Orthodox Jewish viewpoints to racist ones is fallacious and offensive.
November 5, 2015 9:28 pm at 9:28 pm in reply to: For those who don't like gefilte fish, an alternative #1110961Avram in MDParticipantflatbusher,
I still don’t understand the fuss people make about sushi.
Bad fuss or good fuss?
Avram in MDParticipantzahavasdad,
You can say how great the YU candidate is, He is more qualified. Got a degree in psychology , has a great personality and will get more people to come join the Shul
The thing is, both candidates may come off as qualified. Both may have degrees in psychology. Both may have great personalities, and both may cause 3,000 new families to apply for shul membership the minute after the first sermon. Both may have saved a kitty on the way to the interview. But one will preserve the Orthodoxy of the shul, and the other one will not. If that is important to the people in the shul, then they need to know. I think that is the point of the kol korei.
Avram in MDParticipantzahavasdad,
I do not support attacking the Avi Weisses is not because he is right, but because the lay people can get protective of their rabbi and will take an attack on him as an attack on themselves,
The difference between my approach and the Moetzes is I want to show people the postive points of view and not the negative points of view
I understand, and agree that in different circumstances that would be the ideal approach. As I see it, what complicates things is:
1. The Open Orthodox movement is trying to set up a “have your cake and eat it too” situation, claiming that one can adhere to traditional Torah Judaism while violating those traditions at the same time. So simply showing them the beauty of Torah would garner the response, “hey, we do that too!”
2. The movement is actively attempting to supplant the mantle of “Orthodoxy.”
If you have specific ideas for how these two issues can be addressed in a purely positive and inclusive fashion, I’d be very interested to learn them.
November 5, 2015 5:36 pm at 5:36 pm in reply to: For those who don't like gefilte fish, an alternative #1110954Avram in MDParticipantzahavasdad,
I eat it with my bare hands.
I’m not a wine connoisseur, but in general the less like cough syrup it tastes, the more I like it.
Avram in MDParticipantzahavasdad,
Rather than condemn these places , why not open an alternate place instead and show them the true torah lifestyle.
There is a wealth of alternate places, B”H.
Here’s the problem: the leadership of Open Orthodoxy does not want to be shown anything. They want to shake things up and remake the landscape in their own image. You seem to assume that the Open Orthodox are victims of aggression, and that mainstream Orthodox are the aggressors, but in reality they give as good as they get, if not more so.
As far as day to day interactions, I try my best to treat everyone I meet with kindness and sensitivity. Affiliation does not affect that.
Avram in MDParticipantzahavasdad,
(I dont know of any others except for the Hebrew Institute).
In communities not far from mine, there are three Open Orthodox shuls (two of which were previously Orthodox shuls, and one still uses the term “modern Orthodox” instead of Open Orthodox), and a private school with an Open Orthodox rabbi as religious supervisor (previously modern Orthodox). The Open Orthodox rabbis have even formed their own vaad hakashrus, and are extremely vocal outside of the frum community, often criticizing the mainstream Orthodox bodies.
November 5, 2015 3:36 pm at 3:36 pm in reply to: For those who don't like gefilte fish, an alternative #1110951Avram in MDParticipantzahavasdad,
If I told you that I slap the pickled ginger right on top of the sushi rolls like lox on a bagel – apparently a faux pas in the sushi eating world, but I’m not about to stop doing it – would you still drink wine that I touched?
Avram in MDParticipantzahavasdad,
There is an old adage, you catch more flies with Honey than vinegar.
1. Vinegar attracts flies better than honey, so I usually say bees when using that adage 🙂
2. I do not believe that swaying the Open Orthodox leadership back into the fold was the intention of the kol korei.
Avram in MDParticipantSyag Lchochma,
it isn’t the condemnation of the movement that is being complained about. It is the condemnation of the individuals in the movement. ZD is saying that if many of them are just following their Rabbis, as we are all instructed to do, then why is it right to deal so harshly with them on an individual level ie, inclusion in minyan.
I agree with your sentiments here about condemnation of the individuals. I think it is vitally important to step carefully and, as the rules for fighting fair states: attack the problem, not the person. B”H most of the Orthodox people I interacted with before I became frum myself behaved in that manner, even though they would say everything that was said in the kol korei about the movement I grew up in.
When I read the kol korei, I do not see the condemnation of people that you, zahavasdad, and others seem to see. To me, it seems to be laser-focused on the OO movement and its leaders. Everything else (the wine, minyan, etc.) is extrapolation, not interpretation.
Furthermore, zahavadad’s point which you repeated (they are just following their leaders) seems to provides the best justification for issuing such a kol korei.
If I am missing something, please let me know.
November 3, 2015 8:16 pm at 8:16 pm in reply to: For those who don't like gefilte fish, an alternative #1110946Avram in MDParticipantSyag Lchochma,
tuna > sushi > morning sickness for 4 months > gefilte fish
Funny!
Avram in MDParticipantzahavasdad,
It has been interepred that “now we know whose wine we can drink and who can be part of a minyan”
“It has been interpreted that” are weasel words. The only interpretation I’ve seen to that effect came from an Internet sock puppet.
It seems here people dont get my point, Its not what was said, but how it was said
Can you point me to something specific written in the kol korei that bothers you?
Avram in MDParticipantBack to Gan Eden to throttle a certain snake before it spoke to anyone… 🙂
November 3, 2015 7:09 pm at 7:09 pm in reply to: For those who don't like gefilte fish, an alternative #1110940Avram in MDParticipantComlink-X,
Really, people, I think there’s so much variance in the food
that you can hardly say categorically that you don’t like it.
[The Goq and Syag Lchochma, please take notice 🙂 ]
In defense of zahavasdad, there’s more to food than taste. If someone does not like the idea of ground or minced fish, he is not going to like gefilte fish, no matter how it is prepared. And that is ok.
And though I like all three, for me, I have to say that sushi > tuna salad >= gefilte fish.
Avram in MDParticipantzahavasdad,
if They wanted to condem Avi Weiss and say you cant drink his wine that is one thing. However if you say you cant drink the wine of someone who jsut happens to go to Hebrew Institute of Riverdale thats differnet , if someone goes to such a shul you need to act very differently . The lay person are not degenerating the torah, they are just following their leaders.
I’m confused. Where in the kol korei was there anything about drinking/touching wine mentioned? Or anything about laypeople?
The main point I saw from it was that Open Orthodoxy was not a form of Torah Judaism (i.e., Orthodoxy), and therefore their leaders are not rabbis, despite their usage of the terms rabbi and semicha.
It also ended with a prayer for mercy upon all Jews (regardless of affiliation).
Avram in MDParticipantJoseph,
Snopes very frequently has an agenda dismissing things without compelling evidence
Actually, that claim has been thoroughly debunked by Snopes. 🙂
Avram in MDParticipantrather relate the truth than observe some contorted convention invented in academia
And now ad hominem itself is attacked with an ad hominem argument. This is amazing 🙂
Avram in MDParticipantDaasYochid,
Any theories why this is so?
Yes, popa_bar_abba lives in a land controlled largely by high school aged girls.
Avram in MDParticipantComlink-X,
Does anyone know of any reliable sources that back this up?
Moshe Rabbeinu himself?
??? ????????? ???? ???????? ????????? ????? ???? ?????????? ??? ??????????? ?????? ????? ???????? ????? ???????? ???????????
Avram in MDParticipantThis is an amazing thread.
October 27, 2015 4:26 pm at 4:26 pm in reply to: In which someone accuses Joseph of being a masculist 😷 #1107215Avram in MDParticipantThere’s a difference between being a masculist and a misogynist.
October 23, 2015 3:39 pm at 3:39 pm in reply to: Of stupid gefilte fish threads I do shudder #1106467Avram in MDParticipantIf you cover your screen with chrain, it’s not so bad.
Avram in MDParticipantI really like sushi.
I like gefilte fish.
I usually pass on the herring.
Avram in MDParticipantThe Goq and Syag Lchochma,
Are you responding to my post?
Avram in MDParticipantpopa_bar_abba,
Ok, but suppose I was serving them at a bris, along with lox, cream cheese, tuna salad, and rugelach. Is it ok for you to say, “dog feces bagel, ewwwwww”?
Hmmm, probably not a good idea to say anything to the baal simcha in that case, just back away slowwwly, and then run faster than you have ever run before.
But if there’s chrain, perhaps you can cover it up with that.
October 22, 2015 7:31 pm at 7:31 pm in reply to: In which someone accuses Joseph of being a masculist 😷 #1107209Avram in MDParticipantRebbYidd23,
You’re right, and I have not slept enough.
Avram in MDParticipantpopa_bar_abba,
1. If such occurred in real-life conversation, try, “could we please change the subject? I would really prefer to not talk about fecal bagels.”
2. In the CR, even easier: don’t open the thread!
October 22, 2015 6:16 pm at 6:16 pm in reply to: In which someone accuses Joseph of being a masculist 😷 #1107206Avram in MDParticipantRebYidd23,
The word isn’t femininist, so why should it be masculinist?
Replace “ne” with “st”.
Feminine becomes Feminist.
Masculine becomes Masculinist.
Avram in MDParticipantzahavasdad,
I think this is one of those things that some dont get, Some people just like or dislike certain foods.
I think most of the posters here “get” that. I think the problem they may be having is with the impoliteness of declaring foods that they happen to like to be disgusting and vile, which are very strong words.
Yes, people should be tolerant of the fact that you do not like gefilte fish, but you should also be tolerant of the fact that others do like it. And that they do not like having foods that they eat frequently described with the same adjectives that one would use for excrement.
In our home, we do not force our children to eat things that they do not like. But we do stop them if they say “yuck” or “gross” and instead suggest that they say, “no, thank you”, or “I do not prefer to eat that.”
October 22, 2015 2:12 pm at 2:12 pm in reply to: Is it wrong to secretly not want moshiach to come #1132623Avram in MDParticipantnewbee,
This is not a good example because its a destructive act.
The fact that it was a destructive act was the main point of my example. Adam Harishon eating from the pri etz hadaas was a destructive act, one that made serving Hashem and garnering his physical sustenance much more difficult. So now the struggle is our reality, and the more we struggle the better, but that’s not the way things really should be.
A better example would be that not only does he clean his room, but he cleans the entire house, in order to get more reward. … Secretly hoping dinner time is pushed off until later so he has more time to clean the most houses and get the most reward in the short span of “cleaning time” there is etc….
What should be more important, cleaning the house and getting a few more bucks, or relating to his parents over the dinner table? If he gets to where he is secretly hoping his parents would be delayed, then I think he is missing the point.
Avram in MDParticipantThe Goq,
is it bad because it is not a good comparison or is it bad because it conflicts with your viewpoint.
I know this thread is two years old, but my feeling is that your OP moshol does not make a completely fair comparison. There is a world of difference between taking out the trash (2 to 5 minutes), clearing the table (5-10 minutes), changing the laundry over (2-5 minutes), and army service, which is 2-3 years immersed in an environment that is frequently hostile towards chareidim. I think the essence of your point, that those who benefit should also contribute in some form, stands, but the moshol you provided trivializes the chareidi viewpoint.
Avram in MDParticipantSorry, Mr Smith.
Avram in MDParticipantDaMoshe,
I would really miss your posts if you left. Some of my thoughts in the wake of the “Modern Orthodox” and “Chassidus” threads are:
1. The truly bad posts are coming from a very small minority of posters. And it is no use attempting to convince or reason with them, because they are not here for a discussion. There is a cartoon drawn with stick figures with a man saying, “I cannot come to bed, because someone is WRONG on the Internet!”
2. No matter what viewpoint you hold, somebody in the world will think you are wrong, an idolater, whatever. I have seen invective from religious Zionists on other sites that more than matches what’s written here, including astonishing disrespect for gedolim. Seriously, we are all apikorsim if we do, apikorsim if we don’t. So what can we do? Sincerely seek Hashem and strive to live by His Torah, and iy”H He will take care of us and forgive us for any unintentional errors.
3. I think The Goq’s metaphor is spot on.
October 21, 2015 12:17 pm at 12:17 pm in reply to: I am offended by the lack of name-calling #1106457Avram in MDParticipantName calling as in addressing someone as “Bob” instead of “Mr Smith”, or name calling as in “you buffoon!”?
Avram in MDParticipantLoaf. Baked until brown on the outside. Served with carrots, onions, and chrain, or covered with tomato sauce before baking.
Avram in MDParticipantDaMoshe,
Avram in MD: Did you really need to ask?
Yes, because two wrongs don’t make a right.
Avram in MDParticipantDaMoshe,
Is this an ironic spin-off from the “Modern Orthodox” thread?
Avram in MDParticipantrednecker ridiquel,
I would be an anti-semite; but then I read the Torah and it says not to hold a grudge.
So you assert that the Jewish people as a whole have wronged you?
Avram in MDParticipantmtydhd,
My wife feels I should not drive her.
Seriously, how can it even be a question after this?
October 13, 2015 4:45 pm at 4:45 pm in reply to: Is it wrong to secretly not want moshiach to come #1132617Avram in MDParticipantnewbee,
And every day people are wishing for moshiach to come to get rid of THEIR OWN problems so they can experience the bliss of what happens after death without the death process.
So what exactly is wrong with that?
Its human nature, but that does not mean its what Hashem sent us here for in the first place.
I would tend to disagree that it’s human nature in the long term. Humans by nature do not like to be indebted to anyone, so while a salvation might be welcome in the short term, some chafing might develop over the long term without character refinement.
And what do you think Hashem sent us here for? Does he need us? Does he need our mitzvos? Can we really do anything for Him? Not really. In reality, we are here solely because Hashem is giving us everything, so perhaps our purpose is to indeed become perfected receivers.
Ideally, I should have said I hope I don’t get the parking spot if thats what Hashem wants from me now and it will give me the best chance to grow.
That’s not what I would pray.
“Adam chose to pick a fight, so now we have to fight and deal with death. But that is not our ideal state!”
Again, this goes against the basic premise- that earning through fight and effort is better than receiving for free.
Suppose you ask your son to clean his room before dinner, and he suddenly starts smashing things, scattering papers and laundry everywhere, and rips his sheets off his bed. You say, “Why are you doing that?! That’s the opposite of what I asked you to do!”
He says, “So I can earn more reward by cleaning up a bigger mess!”
Does that thinking really make sense to you? Especially if his actions dramatically increase the chances that he won’t get his room clean by dinnertime? Would you really reward him more?
October 9, 2015 2:47 pm at 2:47 pm in reply to: Is it wrong to secretly not want moshiach to come #1132605Avram in MDParticipantnewbee,
When I lived in a certain city I went 2 years without a parking spot … After 2 years, I was finally able to afford a parking spot right next to my apartment. That “luxury” was needless to say, very, very nice.
Your moshol seems to prove my point – during those two years you were probably wishing every day for a parking spot, because you knew that with a parking spot, you could do your grocery shopping with less hardship. You didn’t secretly wish that you wouldn’t get a parking spot.
If I never would have gone those 2 years without the parking spot, or if I would have moved into a different town where there is parking everywhere, that pleasure of having that specific parking spot would never has been as great.
I think that speaks more to human nature than the way things should be. We don’t truly appreciate what we have unless we don’t have it, and that is unfortunate. I feel that one of the big points of Judaism is to learn to truly appreciate what we have when we have it, and I think this midda will be perfected during yemos Hamoshiach. I think eventually during the days of Moshiach, the “bad” years prior won’t even be remembered at all.
Thats how I view techias hameisim- you cant truly get the reward of fighting and working with the guf without the guf itself.
Hashem did not originally set Adam Harishon up for a fight. He placed him in a garden where all of his needs were cared for, where Hashem could “walk” with him (extreme closeness), and the Tree of Life was right there for the taking. There may not have been a techias meisim, because there didn’t have to be meisim at all! Adam chose to pick a fight, so now we have to fight and deal with death. But that is not our ideal state!
October 8, 2015 2:34 pm at 2:34 pm in reply to: Is it wrong to secretly not want moshiach to come #1132598Avram in MDParticipantnewbee,
But you must also say, “if I had a choice, I’d want to sleep in the warm bed in gan eden and learn Torah from the light of the shechina in olam haba.” So ideally, we all want to live in olam haba- in pure bliss and paradise with no problems.
From what you have written, you seem to see yemos Hamoshiach and olam haba as one in the same. I’m not sure that that is the case. I am certainly no expert in these things (nobody is, since it is all beyond us at this point, but I am really not an expert), but I personally see two different “worlds”:
1. The days of Moshiach, where we still have physical bodies, a Jewish nation, Eretz Yisroel, Torah and mitzvos. We still receive reward for mitzvos, and would be punished for aveiros. However, the world will be as full of knowledge of Hashem as waters fill the sea, and all nations would know and follow Hashem, so the prospect of committing aveiros would seem absolutely crazy to us, unlike now when there is confusion and temptation. Rather than reducing our potential for growth and merit, I see this period as a time of unlimited growth and merit.
2. Olam Haba – where it seems that we do not have physical bodies, and can thus be completely united with Hashem. Without bodies, there are no mitzvos. This seems to be the world that you are addressing.
My question to you: we believe that there will be a techias hameisim. Why would those who have passed on to olam haba want to come back to Earth?
October 7, 2015 6:35 pm at 6:35 pm in reply to: I am having a Euro Obsession at the Moment… #1104608Avram in MDParticipantThe US, especially east of the Mississippi River, has considerable diversity in regional dialects as well, well beyond the New York vs. Southern vs. Midwest which was mentioned previously in this thread.
An Alabama “Southern accent” is different than a typical Georgia accent (the “drawl” is much more apparent), and South Carolina, Tidewater VA, etc. are also distinct from each other. Rural southern Appalachian (y’all becomes you’uns) accents are very different from other “Southern” accents, and can be difficult for outsiders to understand. Baltimore residents have a distinct dialect (Bawlmerese, hon!), which is similar to Philadelphia (their NFL team is properly known as the Iggles). In Boston (Bahstin), you pahk yaw cah neah da Dunkin Donuts to get a drink at the bubbly.
October 7, 2015 3:36 pm at 3:36 pm in reply to: Is it wrong to secretly not want moshiach to come #1132588Avram in MDParticipantnewbee,
You have to believe that problem you got from your computer was tailor made just for you. Isn’t that was gam zu letovah means?
Of course. But on Rosh Hashana we eat apples dipped in honey to show that we not only want goodness in the upcoming year, but sweet goodness. On Yom Kippur we daven to be cleansed without serious illness or suffering. If I were sleeping in the wilderness with a sefer, candle, rooster, and donkey because the nearby town turned me away, I would hopefully come to say gam ze letova like Rabbi Akiva did (although I am nowhere near his level though, and I’d probably feel very upset about it), but if I had a choice, I’d want to learn and then sleep in a warm bed in the town’s inn with food in my belly and have no bandits to fear.
You honestly believe 99.999999% of humanity exists the way it does for 99.99999% of the time humanity existed because of some fluke or mistake or sin one person did? I think thats a simplistic way of reading the parsha.
I think looking at the parsha as a fluke or mistake or sin that one person did is an incomplete/incorrect way of reading the parsha. Furthermore, on a simple level, since we are not living in Gan Eden, we have to work hard in agriculture, we don’t have complete mastery over animals, and pregnancy lasts 9 months, then yes, we do exist the way we do because of Adam and Chava’s sin.
-
AuthorPosts