☕ DaasYochid ☕

Okay, here goes:

Once upon a time, there were two friends, popa and DY, who liked pizza, so they decided to meet for lunch at a pizza restaurant.

As popa sat down on his infernal coffee room, DY Retardedly (yes, it’s an adverb also) retarded (yes, it’s a verb also) his order to the mod behind the counter.

Suddenly, there was a Retarded (yes, it’s an adjective also) sound. “Blazes!”, said popa, what was that?!

“Um, nothing”, said DY infernally, “but I think I need to go now”, and he exited verbally.

Now, can I ask pizza chef, I mean, the mod, to undelete the outline?

Mods, please delete:

Once upon a time, there were two dolts (two CR posters) who were covered in (food type), as a result of an unfortunate incident involving 6 wagons, 3 bands playing od yishomo, 4 women selling shmattos, and a small exploding (food type), no larger than (poster #1)’s big fat head, which in turn is no larger than an ordinary sized (adjective)(noun), but much larger than (poster#2)’s (adverb) (verb ending in ed) (his/her (occupation)’s big fat head which usually evokes (adjective) shouts and screams such as “(Exclamation)!, (poster #1), what was that?!”

“Um, nothing”, said (poster #2) (adverb), “but I think I need to go now”, and (he/she) exited (adverb).

First call me a cheater, than tell me to make a story? If I’m a cheater, what’s gonna stop me from making up the story afterwards?

You’re supposed to make up the story before I provide the words.

Right. An unknown source claims that the appearance is based on the appearance of a cat which is a “lucky charm” and you jump to the conclusion that it’s AZ. Huge leap there.

Actually, three huge leaps.

Sam, I’m not mekabel. You’d be assur b’hana’ah, and I wouldn’t be allowed to read and enjoy your posts, and I’m not choshed that you’d be machshil me.

29- Whether it was terrorism or a malfunction – it’s a terrible tragedy!

Of course. Do you really think he disagrees? You have to take his statement in context.

His silence about the three boys was indeed inexcusable.

Obama: Downed Jet in Ukraine a ‘Terrible Tragedy’; Top Priority Is Finding Out If Americans Were On Board

I re-read it. I think 29 is correct.

http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/headlines-breaking-stories/248197/live-stream-israel-begins-ground-offensive-in-gaza-tehillim-needed.html

Give the guy a break, golfer. He’s trying to prove his point to Notasheep.

Thanks for the compliment, though.

Apikorsus.

Should I counter that story with a story of someone who found a shidduch through a professional shadchan?

You’re right, we didn’t answer the question, we avoided it.

I think the answer is that most people would stop, but some are so addicted that they wouldn’t.

Your next question is probably: since it’s assur anyhow because of sakana, what’s the difference.

The answer is twofold. First, not everyone holds it’s assur, and smokers rationalize based on the opinions which are mattir. Second, we are culturally and emotionally conditioned to avoid tarfus, so it’s less of a nisayon.

????? ??????

The fact that ???”? isn’t human doesn’t change the equation, since we are told ?? ??? ???? ??? ????, we are bidden to emulate His middos as if they were human middos.

I can’t cut from your post, so I just copied. I hope you don’t mind.

Can you please number them to make it easier?

Yes, and thanks again to the mods for allowing that.

I agree that more qualified shadchanim would help the situation.

I think it’s unfair to blame the wealthy.

Notasheep, it’s the same with every aspect of our society. For some people, the “systems” we have work, for some, they don’t. Whether you view a particular system as working or broken is usually more a product of your personal experience than an objective overview.

Those are better, but we need good Aramaic expressions for them.

Nah, ahavas maachal doesn’t sound good. “Eim’sa d’taanisa” sounds better.

http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/bde-sudden-petira-of-itzhak-schier-47-zl

NOWHERE in Charlie’s post to he make any type of insult as implied(correct me if im wrong).

I think Redleg based his assumption on the fact that Charlie used ALL CAPS to make his point, generally considered on the internet to be shouting (look, for instance, how popa refuted Charlie point by point, [civilly, it should be noted] using italics).

I think Charlie just meant to deliniate his words from the words of the one to whom he was responding, though. ALL CAPS is easier than italics. As often as I disagree with Charlie, sometimes passionately, he does indeed write very civilly.

I think Oomis is probably right. C.I Boy, I would suggest that you ask your therapist directly what she can relate to your parents, and what she will keep confidential.

RabbiRabin, also nosen taam lifgam, no?