Sam2

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 5,001 through 5,050 (of 7,493 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Black hat #877094
    Sam2
    Participant

    Cheftze: Are you joking? Do you think they wore suit jackets in 16th-century Turkey and Israel?

    in reply to: Black hat #877092
    Sam2
    Participant

    Cheftze: You do realize that the jacket the Shulchan Aruch is talking about it very different from the suit jacket of today, right? Applications can be made from one to the other, but they are clearly not identical.

    in reply to: who will speak at the Siyum Hashas? #876413
    Sam2
    Participant

    Zees: Do they even allow women at the Siyum Hashas? (Honest question; I’ve never been there.)

    in reply to: Technology and the Third Beis Hamikdash #1015960
    Sam2
    Participant

    HaLeiVi: Not quite. It seems fairly clear from the Moreh that the Rambam thought that Nevua was possible even in his time. He Paskens like Shmuel. The only difference between this world and then will be Shib’ud Malchiyos Bilvad.

    in reply to: Black hat #877090
    Sam2
    Participant

    Hershi: You’re ignoring the first word of that S’if Kattan.

    in reply to: hockey #875997
    Sam2
    Participant

    Unless the rules have changed drastically since the last time I checked, it’s 2 red lines including the mid-line. So it’s basically anywhere from behind center ice. (I hope posting the rules isn’t a Lifnei Iveir on Chukas Hagoyim.)

    in reply to: Technology and the Third Beis Hamikdash #1015952
    Sam2
    Participant

    Cheftze: Source please?

    in reply to: Black hat #877085
    Sam2
    Participant

    The Mishnah B’rurah does not say it for Bentsching (as far as I know). The citation that Gabei is misrepresenting is 91:12.

    in reply to: Black hat #877082
    Sam2
    Participant

    Lakewhut: B’nei B’rak and most of Me’ah Sh’arim, as well as certain isolated communities throughout New York and Eretz Yisroel.

    in reply to: The TROLL Thread #1002266
    Sam2
    Participant

    HaLeiVi: Correction- “Troll” is the most overused and misunderstood word on the internet.

    Just curious, was Yamoos hinting at something else here? You could replace the word “troll” with something else in his post and it becomes very interesting indeed.

    in reply to: Black hat #877080
    Sam2
    Participant

    Lakewhut: This depends on Minhag Hamakom. In many places (including almost everywhere out of town) a Kippah is enough. In some places, where one would not be caught outside without a hat ever, it is not enough.

    in reply to: Technology and the Third Beis Hamikdash #1015946
    Sam2
    Participant

    Mammele: Why do you say that? According to the Rambam we certainly will. We don’t seem to hold like the Rambam in Inyanei Mashiach, but it’s still important to recognize his opinion. Also, I haven’t looked, but I do know that the concept of everyone being physically perfect after the Keitz is a Christian idea. I don’t know if it has a basis in Judaism.

    in reply to: Mayim Achronim for Guests #876207
    Sam2
    Participant

    PBA: Yitay is saying that there is a concern that this will make people look and feel like the Minhag to wash Mayim Achronim has greater Halachic basis than the Minhag not to and that it could push out the Minhag not to. I think that’s an issue in some cases (look at what happens with Gebrochts), though whether it’s something to worry about here is a separate discussion.

    in reply to: What Is YOUR Heter to be on the Internet? #876044
    Sam2
    Participant

    My Posek didn’t Assur the internet. I think that’s reason enough.

    in reply to: Let's make YCT teshuvas, by popa #1218358
    Sam2
    Participant

    JaneDoe: I thought the article was fine as well. My point is that you equating an attack on the article with an attack on those Gedolim was unfair.

    in reply to: Let's make YCT teshuvas, by popa #1218355
    Sam2
    Participant

    JaneDoe: Okay, but how does that help your point. Your point is inflammatory because it implies that an attack on the article is an attack on them. The flaw in that logic is obvious. They would all have been able to write articles against YCT that even Rebdoniel would have to agree to. Rebdoniel never attacked them, only the article in question.

    in reply to: Mayim Achronim for Guests #876199
    Sam2
    Participant

    YehudahTzvi: That’s fine. Although if the person is a S’fardi you probably should make it very clear that you are not at all uncomfortable if they use the sink and that they should if that’s their Minhag.

    in reply to: sources about solar eclipses #875512
    Sam2
    Participant

    The Gemara says that a Solar eclipse is to remind the Umos Ha’olam that there is a Dayan and to do T’shuvah and that a lunar eclipse should remind K’lal Yisroel of the same thing.

    in reply to: Let's make YCT teshuvas, by popa #1218352
    Sam2
    Participant

    JaneDoe: While you happen to be in the right here, you evaded his point. They said nothing about YCT in particular.

    in reply to: Unfiltered Internet #876612
    Sam2
    Participant

    Feif: I was told Rav Schachter wanted to go and was asked not to attend. Anyway, he is very Machmir on the internet as well. I believe he says that your computer should have a password and only your roommate (not yourself) should know the password.

    in reply to: Yom Yerushalayim #1017941
    Sam2
    Participant

    Csar: Just curious, why do you call it a Bubbe Maisa? I asked two people who I know who were in Torah Vada’as at the time. Both told me it’s true. (Well, one said he saw it and the other said that he had stepped outside the Beis Medrash at the time but that everyone their knew it had happened.)

    in reply to: with the asifa behind us, what will you do about it? #875658
    Sam2
    Participant

    Imma: Not quite. He said that whatever the Gedolim who spoke after him said would be binding. Unfortunately, I don’t really know what that is because they were almost all in Yiddish after that.

    in reply to: Yom Yerushalayim #1017937
    Sam2
    Participant

    Naftush: The Yeshivah where this story took place (which should be easily verifiable; if it happened there would be many living witnesses) was in America.

    in reply to: Yom Yerushalayim #1017933
    Sam2
    Participant

    Avhaben: Are you saying that because our Avonos caused the Beis Hamikdash to be destroyed that there is no reason to be happy when it is rebuilt? If we never would have sinned then we never would have lost it. Regaining Yerushlayim is a reason to thank HKBH, regardless of how we lost it and how we got it back (also, see my earlier post).

    in reply to: Yom Yerushalayim #1017930
    Sam2
    Participant

    Kaf Ches Iyar 45 years ago was the biggest day of Ahavas Yisrael and Achdus in recent memory. Why do people have to politicize things (from both ends) and ruin it?

    in reply to: Let's make YCT teshuvas, by popa #1218332
    Sam2
    Participant

    Rabbi: I meant Avi Weiss, not Schwartz. I am far too tired to be posting now. I’ll be back later after I take a nap (i.e. after Shabbos).

    in reply to: Let's make YCT teshuvas, by popa #1218328
    Sam2
    Participant

    Rabbiofberlin: Avi Shwartz and Dov Linzer have both published things that basically cross the line into denying Mesorah. That’s very different than Zionism or anything like that. There the argument is on what the Mesorah is, not whether or not the concept exists.

    in reply to: Playing with a deck of cards #875924
    Sam2
    Participant

    2good2btrue: That’s just not true. Look at the Edus things in the Shulchan Aruch. It’s not true.

    in reply to: the neighbor from – – – – #875242
    Sam2
    Participant

    Relaxation: There’s a city in northern Michigan called Hell. I assumed 😉 you were talking about that. And yes, it does freeze over just about every winter.

    in reply to: Playing with a deck of cards #875917
    Sam2
    Participant

    Itche: I once met a guy that reads Tarot cards for Frum people as a joke. I was unsure if it was Assur or if he was Mekayim a Mitzvah because it was Leitzanus of Avodah Zarah.

    in reply to: the neighbor from – – – – #875239
    Sam2
    Participant

    Why are you living in northern Michigan?

    in reply to: Googling Your Date #1075020
    Sam2
    Participant

    I think checking out Facebook is normal. Googling her, not so much.

    in reply to: co-ed first aid course with male and female instuctor #875264
    Sam2
    Participant

    There is probably no inherent Issur (depending on the precise situation), but everything must be done with Sechel. This feels like a lack of Sechel.

    in reply to: Words from an ex IDF solider for Yom HaZikaron #1163271
    Sam2
    Participant

    Health: Both Logician and I understood that point. And, who knows, you may be right. It’s not my place to judge her. However, your reason for saying that Tzitzis is less than other Mitzvos was just not correct, which is what Logician is also pointing out.

    in reply to: Playing with a deck of cards #875902
    Sam2
    Participant

    Gefen: There is no inherent Issur. R’ Moshe has T’shuvos about playing cards on Shabbos. But there is no inherent Issue so long as it’s not for gambling. And I highly doubt the Arizal said anything about it. The modern deck of cards wouldn’t exist for almost 3 centuries after that. It could be he was referring to an old form of Tarot cards, which would make more sense.

    See, however, the Be’ur Halachah in Hilchos Channukah where he says playing with cards is quite a bad thing to do. However, it’s clear that he’s talking about playing with some form of gambling.

    in reply to: Let's make YCT teshuvas, by popa #1218315
    Sam2
    Participant

    HaLeiVi: I would say Ad’raba. The differences between those with more of a Rambam leaning and those with more of a Zohar/Arizal leaning are astronomical.

    in reply to: Let's make YCT teshuvas, by popa #1218312
    Sam2
    Participant

    PBA: That’s a bit arrogant. Academics sometimes (though in my studies very rarely) have a good perspective on things. Just because it doesn’t interest you doesn’t mean that it can’t be the Emes.

    in reply to: Let's make YCT teshuvas, by popa #1218308
    Sam2
    Participant

    Yytz: Rav Schachter called them Conservative. That’s good enough for me.

    in reply to: Let's make YCT teshuvas, by popa #1218303
    Sam2
    Participant

    I think everyone here agrees that no one at YCT now would actually Pasken like this. It’s just a little fun at the expense of a group that is trying to change Judaism, even if it is a bit satirical. Would anyone be complaining if the title was “Conservative-style Teshuvas”? Just read it as that and there’s no real issue here.

    in reply to: Born on Shabbos = not a gilgul #874466
    Sam2
    Participant

    The Mekubalim say today that only 1 or 2 people in every generation aren’t Gilgulim.

    in reply to: Talking after Hamapil by Kriyas Shma Shel Mita #874331
    Sam2
    Participant

    I don’t remember perfectly, but I believe the Tzitz Eliezer agrees with the Aruch Hashulchan that even for a relatively minor bother you can talk and do things after the Brachah. The reason for this is because it’s not a Brachah on sleep itself, but a Birchas Hoda’ah on Minhago Shel Olam. The Mishnah B’rurah says not to. This makes sense because it lines up with their Machlokes about Hama’avir Sheinah (and Elokai Neshama) when one didn’t sleep. The Minhag recently (as evidenced on Shavuos) seems to, at the very least, be Choshesh for the M”B Lechatchilah. It also makes sense, since the M”B is seemingly in a minority in this, that the Aruch Hashulchan is perfectly fine to rely upon if it’s too much trouble.

    If one slept a half-hour, you would be able to get up and do normal things, but you would have to wash Netilas Yadayim first.

    in reply to: Talking after Hamapil by Kriyas Shma Shel Mita #874328
    Sam2
    Participant

    Major Machlokes Haposkim to the order. See the Aruch Hashulchan for talking.

    in reply to: Heteirim for Copying and giving out Music #876353
    Sam2
    Participant

    Ders: I’m sorry. I didn’t realize that explaining Shittos that Frum Jews hold by is “defending the indefensible”. It’s nice to know that when I quote the Mekoros or R’ Schachter that it creates some sort of P’gam because you have decided it’s an indefensible position. (I don’t think I ever specifically spoke here about Gemara at Stern, but I don’t see why that wouldn’t fall under the Prishah; as far as I know they’re not mandatory). And I quoted R’ Schachter as having said that about Rabbi Lamm, which may have been inaccurate. That quote may have been from R’ Soloveitchik or someone else in charge (I heard it B’sheim R’ Schachter but I’ve since been informed that it was someone else).

    And it’s interesting that you mention that quote of mine. That discussion was closed before you started posting in this forum. (In a possibly unrelated note, why can’t I see your profile?)

    in reply to: Let's make YCT teshuvas, by popa #1218284
    Sam2
    Participant

    Logician: So do I. But it seems like, from everything I’ve read in the past few days, that Rabbi Lieberman doesn’t fall under that category.

    in reply to: Translation of Jewish names #874311
    Sam2
    Participant

    Yitay: What type of trolling was my question? Reverse type 3?

    in reply to: Singing A Goyishe Tune #882661
    Sam2
    Participant

    Ders: See what R’ Matisyahu Salomon says about this is Matnas Chayim on Purim.

    And the fact that it’s in the Sha’ar Hatziyun and not the Mishnah B’rurah itself should say something. The M”B quoted almost every Shittah imaginable. The fact that a Shittah is quoted does not necessarily mean that he thinks you should follow it.

    in reply to: Heteirim for Copying and giving out Music #876345
    Sam2
    Participant

    Ders: How about you cite one of my posts where I hold of “shvach MO Shittas that go way out of mainstream”, whatever that means? Or wher I reinterpret a Halachah to sound nicer to women, whatever that means? And until you do either, please stop with the thinly veiled personal attacks on me. Thank you.

    in reply to: Translation of Jewish names #874308
    Sam2
    Participant

    Anyone want to try and translate Ester and Mordechai?

    in reply to: college- #876499
    Sam2
    Participant

    I think Touro does, but I’m not positive.

    in reply to: Sleep #888202
    Sam2
    Participant

    Nechomah: We generally don’t listen to the Rambam’s medical advice, but I don’t think he said that anyway. He did say to get 8 hours a night though.

Viewing 50 posts - 5,001 through 5,050 (of 7,493 total)