Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 28, 2010 10:06 pm at 10:06 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025933WolfishMusingsParticipant
It is actually the mitzvah of tochacho.
There are guidelines to tochacha. Do they include public shaming in a newspaper? If so, please present a source that indicates such.
And lets not use the cop out since there are different standards we should not do anything. Uncovered knees, whether all the time or when in various positions, is beyond the pale.
I’m not coping out. I’m asking a specific question. What are the standards that will be used to determine the “sinners?”
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantwhatever happened to “hinei hee b’ohel?”
I know that I’m as dumb as fiddlesticks sometimes, but I’m not familiar with that pasuk. Or did you mean “henei baOhel?”
In any event, what, exactly, is your point?
The Wolf
July 28, 2010 9:54 pm at 9:54 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025931WolfishMusingsParticipantThis problem is so serious, that perhaps a unrepentant sinner should be publicly shamed with their names in the paper.
Okay… so the cure for the aveira of immodesty is the aveira of lashon hara?
That, also, leaves aside the question of who, exactly, is an “unrepentant sinner.” Is a woman who doesn’t wear stockings in the summer an “unrepentant sinner?” In other words, whose standards of tznius are we going to use to determine who is, in fact, a “sinner?*”
The Wolf
* And please don’t say “the Torah’s standards.” You know as well as I do that there are numerous interpretations of what that means. I’m asking for specific details.
The Wolf
July 28, 2010 9:48 pm at 9:48 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025929WolfishMusingsParticipantIt is time for drastic action.
What drastic things did you have in mind?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf-im not saying right or wrong, but if you know the woman from wherever, then I can UNDERSTAND WHY you would greet her. Same with one’s wife.
But a woman that you never met b4?
It’s not a matter of it being a woman. It’s a matter of it being a person. The fact that the person is a woman, or a non-Jew or a child, or an old person is really incidental.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantDo you people consider extra with your wife the same as extra with someone on the street??????????
I don’t. But if people are going to throw “Al tarbeh…” around, then they can’t just ignore the second part of the statement.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantDay’yo lavoi min hadin leh’yos k’niddon
Not all of us are talmiedi chachomim. Please translate.
Thanks,
The Wolf
July 28, 2010 9:39 pm at 9:39 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025928WolfishMusingsParticipantI will submit the question to someone who is, then.
Please. And please find out the reasoning (one way or the other).
The Wolf
July 28, 2010 9:31 pm at 9:31 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025925WolfishMusingsParticipantI must ask you about the usage of “kriah” as in “Ba’al kriah”.
I believe it’s more correct and is similar to the term “Ba’al Tefilah.” Ba’al Kriah means “master of the reading.” I’m not sure what “Ba’al Koreh” means.
However, I’m not a dikduk expert either and could just as easily be wrong.
The Wolf
July 28, 2010 9:28 pm at 9:28 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025924WolfishMusingsParticipantBut what if he is “talking Torah”?
I don’t understand. How is this any different than the last question that you asked which I answered above. Talking Torah during laining is wrong… period. It’s k’neged halacha and it’s rude.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantFirst of all-did your rav mean greeting aquaintances or greeting absolutely never met before and never will meet people.
Does it matter? Why is a stranger different (vis-a-vis “al tarbeh…”) than Mrs. Katz, the wife of a fellow who davens in my shul?
Anyway wolf-Pleeeeeaaaasssseeee don’t act silly. You know a wife is different.
On the contrary — look at the Mishna — it goes out of it’s way to INCLUDE one’s wife. Why should one’s wife be different when the Mishna specifically includes her in “al tarbeh…?”
The Wolf
July 28, 2010 9:21 pm at 9:21 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025920WolfishMusingsParticipantYes, it matters. If you are talking Torah, you don’t need teshuva. It is a kappara all its own.
I strenuously disagree with that. One who discusses Gemara, for example, is doing two things wrong — he’s not listening to the laining and he’s disturbing others (including, potentially, the ba’al kriah). The fact that he’s learning does not make up for that. The fact that it’s rude only makes it worse — one has no right to be rude while learning.
The Wolf
July 28, 2010 9:18 pm at 9:18 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025918WolfishMusingsParticipantI think that if you talk through the entire davening – start to finish – except for 10 seconds where you observe proper shul decorum, you are a step better than if you talked with no exception.
Not universally — but when it comes to the difference between during laining and between aliyos, then yes. It is no better to be silent during aliyos if you’re going to talk during laining. I feel very strongly about that.
The Wolf
July 28, 2010 9:17 pm at 9:17 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025917WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf: I would hope you are at least talking Torah during leining.
Does it matter? It’s just as bad to talk Torah during laining as it to talk anything else. And, sadly, I cannot do teshuva for it, as I don’t really regret it. 🙁
The Wolf
July 28, 2010 9:13 pm at 9:13 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025914WolfishMusingsParticipantWhat about between aliyos? I’m trying to be melamed zchus here 🙂
If you talk through laining, what’s the point of being quiet between aliyos? 🙁
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipanti was only commenting on a particular manner of approaching life that is so prevalent among Jews in modern liberal america
Fair enough. My apologies.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf, it isn’t rude not to greet others THAT U HAVE NO CLUE WHO THEY ARE AND U JUST PASS THEM BY ON THE STREET.
You don’t have to shout. And yes, I believe it is rude. Would you walk by someone of the same gender on Shabbos and not say “Good Shabbos?”
Does your Rav greet your wife on the street? Does his Rebbetzin greet you? It isn’t a mitzvah in theleast bit.
In fact, my rav has made the point publicly that it is common courtesy and there is nothing wrong with saying “Good morning” or “Good Shabbos” to someone of the opposite gender.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantYes wolf- al tarbeh meaning only whatever is necessary.
So, I suppose that all unnecessary conversation with one’s wife is also forbidden, since the Mishna specifically includes one’s wife?
So, no saying “good morning” to my wife? It’s not really necessary. No talking about books we’ve read? It’s not really necessary either. No pleasant chat over dinner unless we’re talking household matters? No talking while we’re taking a walk?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantPeople determining right and wrong from their “feelings” about what the Torah demands from us.
And how do you know the Torah wants us to not say “good morning” to anyone? How do you know exactly was it covered under “Tarbeh?”
What does a Talmid Chochom tell you that the Torah wants regarding this question.
Oddly enough, my rav tells me that there is nothing wrong with a polite “good morning” or “good Shabbos” to someone.
The Wolf
July 28, 2010 8:50 pm at 8:50 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025912WolfishMusingsParticipantHow about we stop giving Aliyahs to people who talk in Shul? Talking in Shul was blamed for some of the worst massacres of Jews.
Ooooh… don’t get me started. Talking in shul is one of my pet peeves. I personally cannot stand it when people talk in shul (although, to be brutally fair and honest, I am one of the worst offenders during krias haTorah).
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantSaying GM isn’t necessary. Take it from a woman. I’m perfectly ok WITHOUT greetings from every man on the street.
If they greet, they’re being EXTRA nice.
Interesting….
When it came to head coverings, members of this board seemed to say that it was horrible if a woman didn’t aspire to the level of Kimchis. “Why settle for the minimum” was the battle cry.
Yet, when it comes to greeting people, we’re being told, “don’t bother going the extra mile. Stick to the minimum.”
Suffice it to say, I believe that greeting people whenever possible should be done — be they man or woman, Jew or Gentile, young or old. I don’t think that being rude (yes, I call it rude when you purposely don’t greet someone) is what the Torah wants from us.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantApparently, the mods and I disagree on what the Aseres HaDibros actually are and what the words actually mean. 🙂
The Wolf
We don’t disagree with what the translation of “dibros” is. 🙂
WolfishMusingsParticipantOomis- when it says al tarbah sicha em haisha, it didn’t say,”except a good morning greeting”.
I don’t think it’s appropriate to greet opposite genders when you’re only passing them on the street.
Do you believe that saying “Good Shabbos” constitutes “Tarbeh B’Sicha?”
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI do nothing inspiring for anyone. I have nothing to contribute here.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantya got nothing to lose by sending it on to 12 other people.
Sure I do. I have my hard-earned reputation of not sending out junk emails to lose.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantIt also says “al tarbeh sicha im isha”. so?
You believe that saying “Good Shabbos” counts as being “Tarbeh B’Sicha?”
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantHe wasn’t asking for your haskomo.
I didn’t say he was. However, since I was the one who brought it up, it’s obvious that it was in response to my post. Hence I responded. If you would rather I not respond to people, just let me know.
I am under no illusions that anyone in the world needs my haskomo for anything at all.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWith regard to saying “good shabbos” to women, it is an inyan of tzniut. I greet every man in the street, but not women.
That’s fine. No one says you have to follow my mehalech on the matter.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantCan we take a step back for a moment?
Does anyone here actually know who this kabbalist is? Granted, I’m not up on my mekubalim, but this is a name I’ve never heard of before. Of course my lack of recognition at the name doesn’t mean he doesn’t exist, but I’d like to at least hear from a person or two who *does* have some experience with this person.
Thanks,
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantAs always the key to technology (or to any other tool, for that matter) is to use it wisely.
Most of us are capable of using Facebook wisely. I use it to keep in touch with relatives and friends whom I might not otherwise have time to keep in touch with. It provides a way for me to quick update friends/family on new events in our lives. It’s a good, quick way to distribute pictures of the kids and family to those whom we want to send them.
Are there people who use FB irresponsibly? Sure. But there is no reason that those of us who do use it responsibly should be banned from it because some people can’t handle it properly.
In short, the answer is not banning, but education.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantthrow the BT’s to the wolves
<Homer Simposon> MMMMM..... BTs...... </Homer Simpson>
::drool::The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantinconsistencies in content is no proof as to the cause.
It depends on the inconsistency. The one at hand (a first date question and then a question on vacationing with baby & hubby four days later) is quite conclusive as to the cause.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipant2. Where did I say that wearing a shtreimel “makes” you chassidish?
Above: “Ok, so if a person wears a shtreimel and like the look and feels comfortable with it, then he is chassidish”
I won’t go in circles. I think I explained myself enough.
Fair enough. It’s a silly argument anyway and, as HLM says, it’s completely off-topic anyway.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantperhaps you can let us know how you manage this problem on your personal blog.
A blog is different than a message board. Firstly, I allow anonymous posting, so there’s not nearly as much of an “identity” behind the posters as there is here. Secondly, to be honest, I don’t have the traffic that this board does and have never run across the problem.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipanthow would you propose to do this if this was YOUR board?
Here’s what I would do.
Firstly, I’d make it an explicit rule that users must agree to.
Secondly, if someone gets caught doing so, warn them.
Thirdly, do it enough times (twice, thrice, whatever…) then ban them.
Yes, I know that you can’t 100% prevent it from happening. I’m not suggesting that it’s possible to prevent a person from posting under someone else’s account if they are so inclined.
Here, however, the practice of “guest posting” is not only tolerated but expressly allowed (see HIE’s account). That, IMHO, is bad policy. I think users have the right to expect that if they see “WolfishMusigns” as the author of a post that it’s actually me (to the best of the board’s ability to enforce that). There’s no reason why users, seeing a contradiction in my posts, should have to figure out “now which Wolf was that…”
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantdo you mean to imply that if it was your message board you would not allow more than one person to share the same screename?
In an ideal world, yes, that’s correct. Each person should post under their own screen name.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantOk, so if a person wears a shtreimel and like the look and feels comfortable with it, then he is chassidish (excluding yerushalayim). If that person says that he is MO then something is wrong with him.
Wearing a streimel makes you chassidish?
I suppose if I wear a black hat/white shirt and slacks but proclaim myself MO then something is wrong with me too?
Since I don’t follow any one mehalech (I mix and match from different mehalchim in my life) does that mean that I have to mix and match different “uniform” parts?
Sorry, as I said earlier, I believe people are defined by their beliefs and actions — not the clothes they wear. I don’t believe that wearing a streimel makes you chassidish. Granted, most people who wear streimels are chassidish, but to say that the streimel makes you chassidish is confusing the cause and effect.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantjust goes to show you can’t judge!!!!!
Actually, I think that it’s reasonable to expect (unless otherwise explicitly stated) that someone on a message board writes all the messages that are under their name.
Personally, I have long been opposed to the idea of sharing accounts because of situations exactly such as this. However, it’s not my message board…
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI’m planning to go to NH next week with my husband and baby. Where should we stay? what is there to do?
Wow! That was quick. Just four days ago you were telling us that you were going on your first date and didn’t know what to talk about.
Now you have a husband and baby! That’s pretty good for four days.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantBTW, Wolf, I would suggest trying the Shtreimel for a few weeks, you never know you might get loads of compliments!
Ah, thanks, but no.
Aside from the fact that I have no desire whatsoever to wear a streimel, I can’t afford one. I have lots of other things to spend my money on (tuition, bills, tzedaka, photography equipment, etc.) before spending it on a streimel.
NO – These 2 are not connected . You can like the look of it, but you wouldn’t feel comfortable wearing outside
Fine. I thought it was obvious that I’d only wear it if I liked it and I was comfortable with it. I didn’t think it had to be spelled out. But, I’d be willing to bet that in most cases, if I like something, I’d be pretty comfortable with it too.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantHard to beleive.
Why? Why is it so hard to believe that if I really liked the look, that I would wear one even if I weren’t a chassid. After all, that’s what the scenario was predicated on — that I really like the look (and hence I’d be comfortable with it).
The reality is that I don’t particularly like it for myself, but if I did, I don’t see why not?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf, if you put on a shtreimel I would assume you converted to Chassidishism as opposed to putting it on because you like the look.
And that would be a fair assumption. But it was said earlier that I wouldn’t wear one even if I liked the look. My sole point was to argue that point. There’s nothing that says that it’s forbidden for a non-Chassid to wear a streimel. So, if I liked the look, I would wear it.
That people seeing me would assume that I was chassidish is certainly understandable.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantIf you start wearing a shtreimel, it doesn’t make you chassidish. But if you would absolutely love the shtreimel look, you wouldn’t wear it either, because Chassidim wear shtreimlech.
Why not? Is there some rule that says that it’s assur for a non-Chassid to wear a streimel? If I truly loved the streimel look (which I don’t), then I would wear it, regardless of my hashkafah.
That proves that we are categorized by our clothing.
No, it does not.
The Wolf
July 26, 2010 8:50 pm at 8:50 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025890WolfishMusingsParticipant“This nation is characterized by three things: they are compassionate, bashful, and benevolent [rachmanim, baishanim, ve-gomlei chasadim].” (Yevamot 79a)
As I said above… I officially retract the point and ask apologies for all those whom I offended.
The Wolf
July 26, 2010 8:36 pm at 8:36 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025888WolfishMusingsParticipantBusha means shame and is almost always used negatively.
but the Yidden as a nation are called beyshunim
I had temporarily forgotten that reference. I officially retract the point and ask your apologies.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantI know of several such “mixed marriages.”
Are you the potential kallah?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantThis has gone from a halachic discussion to one of hashkafa.
When has a CR thread ever NOT gone off-track after the first page (and very often before)?
🙂
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipant“indication”
Ah. Apparently wolves can’t read. 🙂
OK, let’s rephrase then…
… if I suddenly start wearing a streimel, does that automatically make me a chassid?
The Wolf
July 26, 2010 8:00 pm at 8:00 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025882WolfishMusingsParticipantWhen Jewish women, the foundation of her family cheapens herself, it drags the whole family and future generations down with her.
Why limit to women? The same thing could be said for men.
The Wolf
July 26, 2010 7:59 pm at 7:59 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025881WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf, there is busha and there is busha. Busha can mean shame. But in a different way, every woman inherently has a sense of busha that is actually a wonderfull trait Hashem has given women to help them instinctively understand that they need to be modest, not brazen.
No, I disagree. Busha means shame and is almost always used negatively. The English word I believe you’re looking for is “propriety.” But it doesn’t really matter — I don’t want to get into a pointless language argument.
The Wolf
-
AuthorPosts