Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
WolfishMusingsParticipant
So, in the end, the definition of someone “yeshivish” may or may not depend on his appearance, may or may not depend on his actions and may or may not depend speech and lifestyle.
Well, I’m glad that clears things up for someone as ignorant as I am. 🙂
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantTWO QUESTIONS I POSE:
1) Do you think this award is proper to be given out?
2) If yes, to whom?
1. Yes
2. Every other Jew in the world before me.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantthe shailos are not primarily on sealed bottles with a heksher. the shailos are on bottles without a heksher. (most whiskies, beer, etc.)
Ah, thanks for the clarification. Since I don’t drink beer or whiskey (or anything else for that matter), I would not have even known that such things can be sold without a hechsher.
I guess that’s the price I pay for being such a gross ignoramus about such things (and other things in general).
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantAdditionally I dont like the idea of a kosher liquor store since there is no hashgacha on the place
Please forgive the ignorance, since I’m not a drinker…
Why does a liquor store need a hashgacha? I can certainly understand why you’d want one on the actual bottles of liquor — but why does the store need a hashgacha any more than a Shop Rite might (which it doesn’t).
What are these legitimate shailas that might prevent you from buying a sealed bottle of liquor with a hechsher at the store?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantFor a long time I had difficulty with this as well.
In the end, I decided to just start when the tzibbur did and stop (wherever I was in the tefillah) when the chazzan went on. I eventually found myself being able to go further and further in until I was able to able to finish without difficulty.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipant3. In this day and age she can get a degree online, which she could probably do without everyone knowing
Why do you find that acceptable?
If she’s taking kibbud av to the point where she won’t go to college against her father’s wishes, why is it right if she does it behind his back?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantYou completely missed my point.
My point was that just as I don’t have to morally justify my decision of whether to eat tuna fish or egg salad as long as all other halachic matters are attended to (kashrus, brachos, etc.), why should *how* someone spends their money (after all halachic [and perhaps extra-halachic] obligations are taken care of — and assuming they aren’t doing any aveiros with the money) be a matter of moral justification?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantYou have to answer the following questions:
1. Does she have to go to college to earn a living for her husband?
2. Assuming the answer to #1 is yes, are her parents capable of being reasoned with?
3. Assuming the answers to both #1 and #2 are yes, then you should be able to convince them to let her go.
If not, then your friend has to realize that she can’t have everything. She may have to marry someone who is willing to forego the first couple of years of learning while she earns a degree (once she’s married, her obligation of kibbud av in that respect may no longer apply) or else learn to live with a job that does not require a college education.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantAnd parents probably have a better idea what is right that an 18 year old shnook.
I would venture to say that if the 18-year-old “shnook” doesn’t know what he wants, then he’s not ready for marriage in the first place.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantYou misunderstood me, I said “punkt farkert” than what you understood.
Then in that case, I apologize. I did, indeed, misunderstand what you wrote.
The Wolf
July 12, 2010 3:16 am at 3:16 am in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025681WolfishMusingsParticipant(BTW, the expression “gee” should really not be used by a frum Yid. It is derived from the English name of Oso Ish, and is used by the non-Jews as a way of cursing without saying his whole name. That is how it came into common usage. Just FYI.)
So, when discussing acceleration of rockets, I shouldn’t say that the acceleration has the effect of 10g? 🙂
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantbtw wolf, my “well done” comment was meant wholly sincerely. (in the past you have misinterpreted a comment or two of mine as sarcastic)
Not a problem. I understood what you meant. 🙂
Thanks.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantexecutor =/ executioner
Reminds me of the joke:
If a vegetarian eats only vegetables, what does a humanitarian eat?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantSo what does the olem think about Doctor,Physician assistant, Nursing or Nurse Practitioner, OT, PT, Speech Therapy, CPA, MBA, Law….
That’s quite a broad range to ask for a single opinion…
The Wolf (who will, hopefully, finish his MBA next year).
WolfishMusingsParticipanta mommy
Cool. Where do I sign up? 🙂
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWhen a father yells at his son not to talk during davening, and then turns around to discuss business with his friend, that is hypocritical, and that sends a more damaging message then non kosher cell phones and internet in my book.
Agreed. And even if it has the appearance of being holy and proper it can still come back to bite you.
A personal example:
A few years ago, I would often open up a mishnayos during Chazaras HaShatz. I did this for a while until one day I caught my oldest reading a novel during Chazaras HaShatz. When I told him that it was inappropriate to read during ChS, he responded that I did it, so why couldn’t he? I tried (at first) to justify that my reading was different since I was reading something that was Torah, but in the end, I had to concede the point that he was right. I told him that his point was valid, I was wrong, and that, as of right then, I would no longer be learning during ChS.
Since then, I do not learn during ChS and follow the Chazan in the siddur.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantMoshe,
I’ll tell you what.
You spend your time with your wife the way you want to. And I’ll spend my time with my wife the way I want to. And if that means talking with her, or playing games with her or taking a walk around the block or whatever else it entails to enhance our relationship, I’ll do it.
It’s not your place to determine how much I should talk with my wife or whether or not we should play games together.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantThis weekend we played Wealth of Nations again (I lost to Walter again), Scrabble (I wiped the floor with the kids on that one) and Caylus (which I would have won had I not miscalculated on how another player would move the provost).
I also got to play Scrabble with Eeees (we love to play that game together) and Trivial Pursuit.
Oh, and we got to play Management Material.
The Wolf
July 7, 2010 6:55 pm at 6:55 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025553WolfishMusingsParticipantWe could start with those who routinely dress that their knees aren’t covered in all positions.
I’m not as concerned about where you start. I want to know where you’ll end. At what point between knees-showing and Kimchis will you stop and say “It’s okay for her to dress that way.” The answer should be defined in terms of the questions I had above.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantNow that I think about it more, I might have some insight into this.
I have two kids who graduated from the eighth grade this year. No, they’re not twins — one is 14 and the other 13. The older one was held back by us for a year. Both have birthdays in Sep/Oct.
My son (the 14 year old) was the oldest in his class (as you can imagine). My daughter was one of the youngest. They’ve been that way for the last eight years and will continue that way through high school.
The choice to hold a kid back or not needs to be made taking the kid’s abilities and capabilities into account. Our son, we felt, needed the extra year of pre-school, and so he was held back. That was not the case with our daughter. Both of them do well — I don’t find that my son dominates his class nor do I find that my daughter had difficulty in hers.
Ultimately, each kid is different, and there cannot be a “one size fits all” answer to the question.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf: The original bochur who wants to learn while his parents want him to go to college.
The description given is really too sparse to make a specific answer.
It may well be that he is better suited to learning and therefore should not go to college. It’s also possible that he might be the type to be able to properly synthesize a secular studies program and full time learning. It may also be that his parents want him to go to college just so that it will look good on them. That, obviously is the wrong approach to take.
Without knowing the person, his strengths, weaknesses and propensities, I can’t really answer the question.
My advice would be to consult with a rav or a mentor who knows both the bachur and the parents as to the proper path to take.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantInterestingly enough, as a kid, I encountered far more discrimination AFTER becoming a ba’al teshuva than before it.
When I was in first grade, my parents were not frum. Nonetheless, my mother wanted me to go to yeshiva and so I was enrolled in HILI — an Orthodox school in Long Island. In fact, my rebbe that year was Rav Nachman Mandel. Despite the fact that we weren’t shomer shabbos, the school took me in with open arms. To my knowledge, I was the only kid in the class who wasn’t shomer shabbos. Rabbi Mandel never singled me out for it — on the contrary — he showed me the same love and caring that he showed the other kids in the school.
Fast forward to seventh grade. My parents had since split up. My mother became frum (along with my sister and I). My father remained (and to this day is) not frum.
When my mother tried to get me into a yeshiva, she encountered all sorts of problems. Most schools simply weren’t interested in welcoming a child of divorce who was a ba’al teshuva. One prominent yeshiva in Brooklyn was willing to take me on condition that I have absolutely no contact with my father. My mother turned them down flat.
Eventually, my sister and I found my way into a yeshivos (incidentally, for me, a yeshiva that was very wrong for me, but that’s another story for another time) but until she did, it was very difficult. There was definitely discrimination against her and us.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantIf I remember correctly he says that if it’s not for religious
reasons or a REAL problem w/ shidduch for the child,
(not any personal preferences) the child is not required to listen to the parents. It goes w/o saying that the child has to explain only respectfully that the shidduch is ultimately for
him and therefore his decision. This is no heter in any form to be disrespectful to ones parents.
Can you please point me to the teshuva?
I have a hard time believing that R. Moshe would say that you have to listen to your parents regarding shidduchim if the problem is in personal preferences (i.e. for such factors as hair color, facial features, height, weight, etc.)
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantyitzy99: A woman’s place is in the home.
Not gonna do it. Nope. Too easy. Must…. resist….. 🙂
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantBack to the point, what do you think the Bochur should do in this situation?
Forgive me, but this conversation (as many in the CR do) has wandered all over the place. Which bochur?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantKasha,
Instead of focusing on the choice of phrase, how about making it relevant? Do you think that today’s job market is the same as it was in the Rambam’s time? How does one earn a living in today’s world working only three hours a day — and how can be scaled to meet the needs of the general populace?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantIs it a healthy attitude to want the child to be the top of the class?
Like anything else in life, there’s a balance.
There’s nothing wrong with setting high standards for your kids to aim for — including being top of the class.
OTOH, it is very wrong for a parent to obsess about it and berate the kid if s/he falls short.
My personal philosophy with my kids has always been that as long as I know they tried their hardest and put in the effort then I have no complaints.
If they try and try and try and really put the effort into a subject and come home with a 50 on a test because that’s the absolute best they can do for that material, then I have no complaints. OTOH, if the kid gets an 85 but barely studied and could have done much better — well, then, I’m not pleased at all.
The Wolf
July 7, 2010 3:28 pm at 3:28 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025535WolfishMusingsParticipant(I’m thinking this might even work with people/families that routinely breach tznius b’rabim — by also picketing in front of their houses after asking them to stop and they ignore it.)
And whose standard will you be applying? After all, some groups require at least 30 denier stockings. Others maintain that having the lower leg bare is okay. Some groups maintain that wearing a sheitel is not tznius (only a tichel or the like is acceptable). Others (Chabad, for example) ONLY wear sheitels and say that other methods are not tznius (since the hair sometimes shows). Other groups will maintain that snoods are not tznius. Others disallow certain colors (while others maintain that the colors are fine) and yet others tend to go for only black/white.
Whose standard do we choose? Or do we choose the most machmir standard and boycott anyone who doesn’t measure up to that?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantThe Rambam writes that a “working person” is someone who learns 8 hours a day and works 3. Not works 9am to 5pm.
I love how this little nugget gets trotted out every now and again when it’s completely irrelevant to today’s professional world.
The ways in which we do business (which includes holding a job) are much different today than they were in the Rambam’s time. There are very few jobs available for people to work only three hours a day and those jobs are generally not the type at which you can make a living doing that and nothing else.
The Wolf
July 7, 2010 2:22 pm at 2:22 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025532WolfishMusingsParticipantIt’s fairly obvious from the Gemara that there can be multiple Kohanei Gedolim at one time. There’s no reason to say that the majority of Kimchis’s sons died.*
The Wolf
(*Other than the fact that the story happened over 2000 years ago, of course.)
July 7, 2010 2:20 pm at 2:20 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025531WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf, if a woman comes to a store and buys nontsniusdic outside clothing, chances are she is buying it to wear it outside, and not bsoh beisa bifnei ba’ala.
I agree with you on that. But nonetheless, it is possible to use it in a permitted manner. Kasha thinks that stores shouldn’t sell it even if it can be used in a permitted manner. Furthermore, he feels that everyone should strive to the level of Kimchis. So, it seems to me, that he would say that lingerie stores are assur — and after saying so several times, he has yet to comment. I’m almost inclined to say “shtika k’hoda’a” already.
The Wolf
July 7, 2010 6:31 am at 6:31 am in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025522WolfishMusingsParticipantStop being ridiculous. A lingerie shop is not a problem. The issue with non Tznius outer clothing is that women are being nichshol men with how they dress.
I’m not being ridiculous. Kasha keeps bringing up Kimchis, so he’s clearly talking about in the privacy of one’s own home — not when women are being nichshol other men.
The Wolf
July 7, 2010 2:01 am at 2:01 am in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025508WolfishMusingsParticipantThe Chazon Ish paskened that a woman has no right to support her husband’s learning by selling pritzus clothing (and I can assure you he wasn’t talking about today’s pritzus).
So, is it safe to assume that you believe frum women shouldn’t operate (let alone patronize) a lingerie shop (as, I believe, Kasha believes*)?
The Wolf
*(Except that he keeps refusing to answer the question)
WolfishMusingsParticipantwhen i’m with my grandmother, we use ‘jewish’ songs, and it’s so much more meaningful with my grandmother’s tunes.
That’s perfectly understandable. Your grandmother and her tunes must have a lot of emotional meaning for you.
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipant2) I have to bump into this thread which makes me dread even more going/being in shidduchim
Why? Do your parents and you not see eye-to-eye on shidduchim?
The Wolf
July 6, 2010 9:39 pm at 9:39 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025492WolfishMusingsParticipantGAW,
We’re not talking about gedarim in the home, we’re talking about whether or not a store should be allowed to sell such items. The opinion (as I understand it) that he’s expressed is that, in emulation of Kimchis, such things should not be used at all and therefore not sold (like pork).
I think we can all agree that a lingerie storekeeper has no obligation (and should not) be following up with her clientele on how these wares are used.
The Wolf
July 6, 2010 8:57 pm at 8:57 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025487WolfishMusingsParticipantGAW,
I agree. But Kasha seems to think that such clothing shouldn’t be worn even in the private company of a woman’s husband (or am I wrong about your position?)
The Wolf
July 6, 2010 8:52 pm at 8:52 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025485WolfishMusingsParticipantWe should encourage them to want to, if they don’t already.
And if, after your encouragement, they still don’t want to cover their head every minute of the day even when halacha doesn’t require it, then what? Will you force them? Or will you let them be within the parameters of halacha?
The Wolf
July 6, 2010 8:49 pm at 8:49 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025482WolfishMusingsParticipantI’m not sure what lingerie is other than some under garments.
Suffice it to say, lingerie is more than undergarments. If I get more explicit, my posts probably won’t be approved.
The Wolf
July 6, 2010 8:46 pm at 8:46 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025480WolfishMusingsParticipantSo was Kimchis a fanatic who went overboard with “chumras”?
Not overboard, but set a very high standard that most people cannot (and don’t want) to reach.
Or should we encourage future Kimchis?
Not if they don’t feel they want to do that.
The Wolf
July 6, 2010 8:35 pm at 8:35 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025477WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf, whats wrong with under garments?
I KNEW I shouldn’t have added in underwear as that would sidestep the issue. 🙂
I was really going for lingerie shops. Should they be closed down, according to your viewpoint?
The Wolf
WolfishMusingsParticipantthe zohar says that all tunes can be uplifted for spiritual needs
Interesting.
I’ve noticed that when we sing zemiros on Shabbos, the kids may or may not participate depending on their mood. But when I put a Shabbos Zemer into a tune they know from elsewhere, I usually get quite a bit of participation (until the novelty wears off). Personally, I think the added benefit of their eager participation in singing Shabbos Z’miros far outweighs any concerns over using secular music (which they know anyway).
You’d be surprised how well “Yom Zeh M’chubad” fits to the tune of the Chicken Dance song.
The Wolf
July 6, 2010 8:30 pm at 8:30 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025474WolfishMusingsParticipantNo a “frum” merchant should NOT be selling pork or pritzus — even though it may be mutter to feed the pork to your dog or use the pritzus for some benign utility.
So (to finally get to my point), I suppose lingerie shops should not exist in your worldview? Or underwear stores?
The Wolf
July 6, 2010 8:24 pm at 8:24 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025472WolfishMusingsParticipantSo (at the very least) we see how beneficial it is to keep [the much maligned today, I should add] so-called “chumras”.
I see you’re still not answering the question that was asked.
The Wolf
July 6, 2010 8:10 pm at 8:10 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025470WolfishMusingsParticipantDerech,
I’m glad your wife in on such a high madreiga. I say, without any malice or sarcasm, that I’m happy for you and wish you both extreme happiness in it.
Nonetheless, not everyone is up to that, nor should everyone automatically be “pushed” up to the strictest level of observance on every issue. Some people just don’t want it (for whatever reason) and, since it’s not actually forbidden, it’s not your place to say that they are wrong. If a woman wants to keep her hair uncovered when she sleeps, showers or even when just home alone, it’s perfectly alright in halacha.
The Wolf
July 6, 2010 8:05 pm at 8:05 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025469WolfishMusingsParticipantKasha,
Kimchis doesn’t matter because it’s still not obligatory according to ANY rav. So, instead of answering the question that wasn’t asked, how about answering the one that was.
Specifically, since there is no question that a woman is allowed to wear whatever she likes when alone with her husband and in private, why should she not be allowed to buy any article of clothing that she can use in those circumstances?
The Wolf
July 6, 2010 7:48 pm at 7:48 pm in reply to: Mourning During the 3 Weeks, Do we Really Mean it? #882611WolfishMusingsParticipantThats the wrong Hashkofa.
Mitoch shelo lishma, ba lishma.
The Wolf
July 6, 2010 7:06 pm at 7:06 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025462WolfishMusingsParticipantWas the lesson taught by the Gemara [Yoma 47a] which relates that Kimchis had 7 sons who became High Priests because she was so modest that “the beams of her house never saw the hairs of her head” (She would always keep her hair covered even in the privacy of her own home) lost?
Does the average woman keep her hair covered all the time (meaning while sleeping, showering, etc.?) No. I’d be willing to bet that over 99% of the women in Klal Yisroel today don’t hold to such a standard. So Kimchis’s example is not relevant for most of us.
That being said, it is still clearly permitted. So answer the question — why should a woman not be allowed to purchase said clothing?
Even putting that aside, I don’t think any a frum person can rationally argue in favor of frum stores selling pure pritzus.
I can’t think of a single item of clothing that is “pure pritzus” (i.e. should not be used at any time under any circumstance). If you know of one, please elaborate.
(Shaatnez and other such considerations aside, of course).
The Wolf
July 6, 2010 6:57 pm at 6:57 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025459WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf: By that argument, you are positing that “frum” clothing stores could sell miniskirts and sleeveless shirts or any pritzus of their desire. Sorry that does not “cut it.”
Why not? I wasn’t really discussing miniskirts and sleeveless shirts, but the reasoning still applies.
My wife is allowed to dress as such in front of me in private. I don’t believe there is anyone who disputes this. That being the case, if she were to wish to dress that way in the privacy of our own home when we’re alone, why shouldn’t she be allowed to purchase said clothing?
The Wolf
July 6, 2010 6:31 pm at 6:31 pm in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025456WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf:
A person who keeps Hilchos Tznius keeps it no matter where she is and it doesnt change. There arent different rules for whats Tznius at work, shabbos, the mountains, vacation…
Again, you’re missing the point.
You (or was it another poster?) want to ban the sale of clothing in frum stores based on tznius criteria.
My point was that there are articles of clothing that one would call not tznius and yet it is perfectly acceptable (in specific contexts) for a bas yisroel to wear them. So issuing a ban on those stores for carrying those items is flawed.
(That’s aside from the fact that there’s nothing to stop a woman from buying something one size small so that it’s shorter and/or tighter on her. What are you going to do — ban the same of small size clothing?)
The Wolf
-
AuthorPosts