Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 7, 2016 9:29 pm at 9:29 pm in reply to: Controversy In Israel – Woman says Sheva Brachos #1180915☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant
Again, there’s no reason chiyuv should make a difference. I showed you that the concept of zilusa comes from Rishonim (in that case regarding Megilla reading).
This has nothing to do with my country or yours, it has to do with being mevazeh a huge talmid chacham.
June 7, 2016 8:44 pm at 8:44 pm in reply to: Controversy In Israel – Woman says Sheva Brachos #1180913☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant?????? ???? ?? ?”? ?”? ????
And your comments regarding the Chofetz Chaim are offensive.
June 7, 2016 8:16 pm at 8:16 pm in reply to: Controversy In Israel – Woman says Sheva Brachos #1180911☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSheva brachos (or at least the last two) are optional?
Anyhow, I don’t think there would be a chilluk.
We don’t call women up for extra aliyos either.
June 7, 2016 8:13 pm at 8:13 pm in reply to: Women only hours at a public municipal pool in Williamsburg #1158841☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWouldn’t that be sects discrimination?
June 7, 2016 8:08 pm at 8:08 pm in reply to: Controversy In Israel – Woman says Sheva Brachos #1180909☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWho said anything about chiyuv? You asked for a mekor for women not saying Sheva Brachos, and I gave you one.
June 7, 2016 8:02 pm at 8:02 pm in reply to: Low tech tip to help prevent child left in car #1154576☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantLow tech version is have a giant message written into the carseat to remind you.
That’s obviously not effective, or you would have recommended that to remind you not to leave your child in the car.
So what I used do was, I used to always walk around with only my left shoe on. This way, when I would drive, I would have to put my right one on, (see http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/low-tech-tip-to-help-prevent-child-left-in-car#post-612700), which reminded to take my left shoe off.
The app is more comfortable.
June 7, 2016 7:53 pm at 7:53 pm in reply to: Controversy In Israel – Woman says Sheva Brachos #1180907☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThe question I’m posing is “if anyone is aware of a Mekor for Noshim not saying sheva brachos.”
‘?”? ??”? ? should apply to this as well.
June 7, 2016 7:09 pm at 7:09 pm in reply to: Low tech tip to help prevent child left in car #1154571☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI do that, and I have sensors in the car which are connected to an app which reminds me to take off my shoe, otherwise I’d forget.
June 7, 2016 2:58 pm at 2:58 pm in reply to: Controversy In Israel – Woman says Sheva Brachos #1180894☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSam, the Aruch Hashulchan says that it not being the chosson is the minhag.
June 7, 2016 2:54 pm at 2:54 pm in reply to: Controversy In Israel – Woman says Sheva Brachos #1180893☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantGavra, they still violated the halachah.
Also, isn’t ??? ??? ?? ?????? an issue?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThat’s not disputing. Giving $105 is giving $104 plus another dollar.
???? ????? ???
June 7, 2016 2:50 pm at 2:50 pm in reply to: Women only hours at a public municipal pool in Williamsburg #1158827☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThey wouldn’t make a stink over it if it was for Muslim women.
June 7, 2016 1:51 am at 1:51 am in reply to: Controversy In Israel – Woman says Sheva Brachos #1180886June 6, 2016 4:17 pm at 4:17 pm in reply to: Controversy In Israel – Woman says Sheva Brachos #1180861☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantPopa, once is better than none, and there is a chance she’ll continue.
June 6, 2016 3:37 pm at 3:37 pm in reply to: Controversy In Israel – Woman says Sheva Brachos #1180856☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantZD, for taharas hamishpachah it works, but for kiddushin, it invalidates it.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantOf course, we don’t pasken according to that Rambam.
Avi, your suggestion that the IDF Rabbinate should be the arbiters of who should learn is laughable.
So far, I’m unimpressed by the responses. I quoted (linked) three of the foremost poskim of our times, and the only “counters” were irrelevant to the question.
June 6, 2016 2:02 am at 2:02 am in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154356☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSomebody told me over Shabbos…
During leining?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIs someone who lives in a 4 Bedroom house in Brooklyn. Drives a 2016 Honda Pilot, Eats Beef 2 or 3 times a week and has imported Italitan Furnitre and goes to Florida in the winter and Israel in the Summer materialist?
On a scale of 1-10, 7.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantmy family is originally from Bobowa
Is that regular Bobowa, or Bobowa-45?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantZD, so is someone who lives in a $3 million dollar house, drives a $150,000 car, wears $5000 suits and watches, and goes on two $50,000 vacations a year at the same level of materialism of someone who lives in three bedroom apartment, drives a Toyota, wears a Seiko watch and Hat Box suits?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantContinued refuah.
Listen, if you want to waste (or spend if you prefer) your money on a Jaguar, that’s between you and the Ribiono Shel Olam. I promise you, I’m not jealous in the least.
But don’t fool yourself into thinking it’s about reliability and value. For that, you could have bought a Honda or a Toyota. In fact, if you put 5k miles on it per year, you could have bought a Chevy for the best value.
Sure, for a luxury car, $3500 per is cheap. But that’s not at all the lesson that your Oma was trying to teach you.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantAmazing how ubiquitin caught R’ Moshe Feinstein, R’ Eliezer Valdenberg, and R’ Tzvi Pesach Frank zt”l missing a pasuk in the Torah.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantDaMoshe, a couple of questions.
Did you ever track down the transcript for Rav Reisman’s shiur?
Did R’ Yaakov or R’ Gedaliah do anything in subsequent years to celebrate? If so, what?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantGive or take…
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantPopa’s own threads are so brilliant that they can descend into utter stupidity much quicker than the typical thread.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantAny others to add?
syntactic ambiguity troll
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantActually, the people who didn’t respond were testing YOU to see if you would post more of your sanctimonious, self-righteous drivel.
You failed.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participanteven though some posters are deliberately mean and insulting to me.
I’m sorry. I’ll try to stop. It’s just that sometimes you make it so easy…
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantDaasYochid, now you tell me, I will actually be working part time at the zoo to pay for dental school there
Well, why did you give me such short notice?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantStay away from the zoo? Don’t become a dentist?
June 2, 2016 9:58 pm at 9:58 pm in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #1154642☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIt might block everything until it’s uninstalled by someone with the password.
June 2, 2016 8:20 pm at 8:20 pm in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #1154637☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThat it not become unfiltered? Agreed. It probably doesn’t.
June 2, 2016 8:05 pm at 8:05 pm in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154343☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantJune 2, 2016 8:00 pm at 8:00 pm in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #1154635☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantAnd there is a filter called Web Blocker pro and it warns you, that it is going to root the phone
That’s not what it says. It says it will only work if the phone is already rooted.
If rooting were so dangerous, the Play Store shouldn’t carry apps which require root.
June 2, 2016 7:38 pm at 7:38 pm in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #1154634☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThe reason they give for not wanting you to install third party apps is security, and in some cases it’s legit, but TAG only installs filters from known, secure companies.
June 2, 2016 7:24 pm at 7:24 pm in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154341☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIn other words, you don’t have a basis for your hashkafos other than your boich.
You don’t like my boich alternative with the random words in a barrel?
I actually have no idea where he gets his hashkafos from, but I had to post something, so I put random letters in a barrel, and the word b-o-i-c-h came out. So I posted that.
June 2, 2016 6:39 pm at 6:39 pm in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154338☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIn other words, you don’t have a basis for your hashkafos other than your boich.
June 2, 2016 6:31 pm at 6:31 pm in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #1154630☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantGavra, I don’t think every filter offers that.
Also, I wonder if it becomes unfiltered, or resorsts to a free version, or the phone stops working for data.
June 2, 2016 6:28 pm at 6:28 pm in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #1154629☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThere is a danger if they try to root a phone model for the first time that it could brick it. The phone could still be fixed.
They have probably installed thousands of these filters without issue. If you know what you’re doing (they do) it’s fine. The phone manufacturers also tell you to only use chargers made by them. They do that in their own financial interest.
Also, there are filters which don’t need phone rooting, and as I mantioned, the prices are NOT clearly stated on the app store.
Call them and ask, instead of spreading misinformation.
June 2, 2016 5:54 pm at 5:54 pm in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #1154626☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThe most effective filtering app (that I am aware of) is not on the Play Store.
Another is listed as a free app, but (as they clearly write in the product description) it us only free for a trial. To keep it, you need to make an in app purchase.
Call TAG and ask them for the most updated information (mine might not be).
June 2, 2016 4:29 pm at 4:29 pm in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #1154621☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantYou apparently don’t know what my logic is. I am not saying the various providers should charge exorbitant amounts because it’s such a big z’chus.
I’m saying they need to cover their costs, and in the case of private business, make a profit.
The yeshivos and BYs need to pay their salaries and bills. TAG is paying filtering companies and other costs. Both are subsidized by donors and therefore charge less than the actual cost.
The yeshivas, BYs, TAG, and other organizations I’m sure would love to provide their services for free, but they can’t.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantJune 2, 2016 3:45 pm at 3:45 pm in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #1154618☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantGreedy restaurant owners want more customers so they take hechsherim recognized by different groups.
Evil capitalists.
If you want to subsidize tuition for those on the fringe, support Oorah or your local day school.
I guess we need to define “should”. If you define “should” by attracting the most people to buy kosher and go to frum schools and have filtered phones, not only “should” it be equivalent, it should all be free (after all, public school is free). In fact we should pay people to take kosher food, go to frum schools, etc. That will attract even more people.
June 2, 2016 3:27 pm at 3:27 pm in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #1154615☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWhy should it not cost more, since it costs more to produce?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThat doesn’t change the essence of his point.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant40
June 1, 2016 8:56 pm at 8:56 pm in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154313☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWhy would you legitimately want hide today?
Who cares? We’re not discussing fashion, we’re discussing hashkafah.
June 1, 2016 5:42 pm at 5:42 pm in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154305☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantBaruch Hashem, today we have plenty of ways of clothing our bodies without killing lions.
It’s not a heter for sha’as had’chak. It’s not achzarius if there’s a purpose for normal human needs. It would be okay nowadays too, if there was a need for lion hides.
June 1, 2016 5:21 pm at 5:21 pm in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154303☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantHunting is not banned. It is muttar for food/hides.
-
AuthorPosts