Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
How sober to daven native? Edit Massive. maariv. silly autocorrevt.
no mussaf today’ would breeds to drink mire but there’s ni mire wine left and it’s after ????. still need to daven Madrid so another good reason to north drink any more.
She’s a girl. no extrapilation. she should gave been taught.
Drug Haman? bariuch Mordechai. you’re wrong again
edit: I still love you, even though I don’t know you.
not Mishnah berurah who says even men.
not ???? yet. is it Too late?
riding in a taxi! how horrible you must be so traumatizrd/!
not exacctlt Luke a blazing skunk which probably smells really bar but still lots of wine.
Sam, who says there’s no mitzvah with whiskey?
ZD, yes there’s a difference; we’ve been through this before.
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/dunkin-donuts/page/2#post-441701
Yitayningnishtgut, shteit nisht?
Look at the Ritv”a in hilchos brachos. I’m sure there are more sources, I’ll try to find them noch Purim. A freilichn!!
Yitayningwut,
Do you think it’s reasonable to assume that a woman loses her kesuvah for not covering certain areas, but it’s muttar to do so?
The Shatark part of my family Will eat the homes of non-chalov yisroel members (assuming they are given Chalov Yisroel) They are quite yeshivish
That’s supposed to prove that all poskim hold that chalav stam is really muttar?
male siblings
Is that similar to brothers?
Nisht, he doesn’t call it CY, but the lomdus is that it is considered CY. Others were mattir based on the gezeirah no longer applying, but R’ Moshe is being mattir based on the anan sahadi being a kiyum of the gezeirah.
No, not today.
Oomis, thank you and same to you and yours.
ZD,
You’re sure, but you’re wrong. Do you have basis for what you’re saying?
You can check out the opinion of the Minchas Yitzchok and others if you’d like.
Nisht, Ben is right; R’ Moshe’s heter assumes that the milk (“cholov hacompanies”) has the din of CY. It’s impractical to label it as CY, though, because of the poskim who disagree, and because R’ Moshe himself preferred supervised milk.
Rd and Ben, the Chazon Ish was meikil for tinok shenishba, but not R’ Moshe.
The pots mighty not be a problem if the homeowner already cooked the food; stam keilim einom bnei yoman.
Whether or not a mechallel Shabbos makes bishul akum is a big machlokes acharonim.
7
Health, I have news for you; whoever reads this gets the creeps, and doesn’t think very highly of the guy who started it. It’s in your best interest that this topic NOT be bumped.
Pba, I’ve heard that some stores bake on their own, and some receive deliveries. The question still remains, though, where the deliveries are from (do the bakeries sending the donuts have hashgocha).
Jbaldy22, you’ve just described the process, but haven’t offered an explanation.
Claiming that going on Facebook is causing divorces is like claiming that heart attacks are caused by indigestion. There might be a connection (unhappy people with roving eyes look all over the place), but one doesnt cause the other.
Certainly, the fact that people with marital problems report issues with internet/social media doesn’t prove which is the cause and which is the effect. It makes a whole lot of sense that unhappy people look elsewhere, as you say, but the easy access makes it more likely, and there have certainly been plenty of cases where the cause was someone giving in to the temptation of the internet, causing the unhappiness.
It’s way too simple to blame the higher divorce rate on the internet/social media; there are many factors. There’s no question in my mind, though, that it hasn’t helped.
Jbaldy22,
And what did he say is the cause of decreasing honesty between spouses?
Health, I don’t know what I wrote that made you think I was saying that the gezeirah applies to all milk products according to all shittos, but I didn’t mean that.
Chalav Stam is not trief like Pigs Milk
That’s true. Chalav stam is a machlokes, and at worst is an issur d’rabbonon. Pig’s milk is an issur d’Oraisa.
BTW I think on of the reasons regular Milk is ok, is because its not Chalav Akum, but rather Chalov Machine.
I dont think even in Chalav Yisroel does a jew milk the cow, Its probably the same machine in the same dairy farm (Likely a special run where someone just watches the process).
The issur has nothing to do with who does the milking, as long as there’s no supervision, it’s assur (aside from the heterim which may apply in our times in the U.S.)
I found an article that says it’s very difficult to milk a pig anyway. In the U.S., there’s no economic incentive to pass off the milk of a beheimah t’mayah as cow’s milk.
There are beheimos temeios other than pigs.
Whether there needs to be financial incentive for the gezeirah to apply is part of the machlokes.
ZD, no they’re not putting in pig’s milk on the farm. I am not nearly as confident that they don’t switch to non CY milk, though.
ZD, it is indeed unlikely that milk from any other animal is mixed in. The issue, though, revolves around understanding the nature of the gezeiras Chaza”l, which still applies despite the stated reason no longer applying.
Purple, there have been cases where the workers switched things under orders from management. It could happen out of laziness as well, for example, if the C’S milk is closer.
A couple of years ago, there was a store in which a worker bought treif’e hot dogs because they ran out of the kosher ones.
I didn’t assume it was glass… Ben?
73,
My sn was not an attempt at gaa’vah (not that I’m lacking…).
I originally used it on a different site, because someone called himself “Daas Torah”, which kind of rubbed me the wrong way, so I chose a name to show that whatever I write is just one person’s opinion.
Don’t worry, I didn’t think it was. I just thought that it set itself up for that subtitle quite nicely. 🙂
I can’t imagine that the cheese isn’t batel b’shishim. The cholent should be fine. The lid needs to be kashered, I assume, and probably the pot as well. Let us know what answer you get from a posek.
Thanks for the compliment.
You sort of set yourself up for it. 🙂
Snowbunny, I know, just poking a little fun.
SaysMe, I predicted correctly.
VM,
Correct on both. A goy has no chiyuv to toivel his keilim, and a Yid may borrow them, aside frm blios issues.
If food was prepared in keilim which require but did not undergo tevila, the food may be eaten.
For this reason, HaRav HaGaon HaGadol Hershel Schachter, shlita, doesn’t drink any milk.
If that were the reason, he would drink cholov Yisroel, as those companies, I am told, don’t use milk from these cows.
In fact, he holds, if I a not mistaken, that even without this procedure, most cows are treifos.
The dog probably confused you with popa.
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/wherein-popa-gets-his-deserts
there is a BIG difference between, lets say, Pninim, and Ateres, and even a big difference between Ateres, and Hadar.
What is the tuition in each of those? I thought they all charged about the same.
JK
Who gave me my subtitle? (It’s certainly better than the last one I had, other than “member”).
73
VM;
1) As I previously mentioned, it depends on how the dishwasher works. If the soap is released after the hot water with treif food floating in it touched the dishes, it treifs up the dishes. I was told this regarding home dishwashers.
2) Correct, I was illustrating, by example, that it’s likely to be switched. It wasn’t a raya. Understand, though, that the normal rule of “achzukei issur lo mechzkinan” (we don’t assume issur) was suspended for milk (the gezeirah of cholov aku”m), so once the seal is broken, and the milk is unsupervised, it no longer has the status of cholov Yisroel.
2a) That is incorrect. Many poskim do not hold of the heterim of R’ Moshe, the Pri Chodosh, etc. According to these poskim, unsupervised (by a Yid) milk is completely assur (mid’rabbanon). Many people follow these shittos.
There is also an opinion among some rabbonim (the Nirbater Rov is on record, and I spoke to a prominent Litvishe posek who concurs) that R’ Moshe’s heter no longer applies because of some technicalities in the way the distribution of milk has changed. Rav Belsky disagrees, and I’ve heard that R’ Dovid Feinstein holds that his father’s heter still applies.
The point I’m making is that there are a couple of legitimate halachic angles to say that unsupervised milk in America today is absolutely assur, so it’s not semantics to differentiate between keeping C.Y. as din or chumra (I personally keep it as chumra, but since I’ve heard that the modern applicability of the heter is questioned, I am more machmir than previously).
SaysMe, I expected it to be deleted (now it probably will be…).
it is that forcing private bein adam l’makom on a large scale is not what the Torah authorizes and it doesn’t do anything to force someone to shake a Lulav if in their mind they are doing nothing.
It’s funny that you should give that example, because the Gemara actually says that we do force someone to do the mitzvah of lulav.
http://www.hebrewbooks.org/shas.aspx?mesechta=31&daf=132b&format=pdf
This is a famous debate, whether or not common usage of a word, even if its usage began in error, renders the word (or in this case, it’s usage for a certain meaning) legitimate. I pasken that it does.
Ben, I know the Gemara sounds like das Yehudis can’t be d’Oraisa. The reason I entertain another possibility is the loshon of Rashi on the Mishnah, that das Yehudis means it’s nahug “af al pi d’lo ksiva”. He could have simply written “af al pi d’eino min haTorah”.
I may sound like a broken record, but, again, R’ Moshe writes that the chiddush of sa’ar is that it’s like basar; obviously, some form of basar is d’Oraisa. The source might be a kal ‘chomer from sa’ar, or there might be a different source which you and I are not aware of.
Is sa’ar had nothing to do with men seeing, t wouldn’t be uttar in the house. The reason it’s muttar in the house id because men won’t see it. See, for example, Rashi s.v. “v’derech mavui”.
I thought you had conceded that sa’ar was ervah based.
Mammele: oops, my mistake
No, Haifagirl’s mistake.
flaunt
1 : to display ostentatiously or
impudently : parade <flaunting his
superiority>
2 : to treat contemptuously
Untermeyer>
Merriam-Webster
Daniela, the name lesschumras was chosen by the user. The subtitle more din was applied by a moderator.
VM,
If you keep CY as a chumra, you can decide to be meikil where you want and take your chances. If you hold of it as the actual din, I don’t think you can.
In the local convenience store, owned and operated by non-Jews, they sell containers of CY milk. They also keep an open one for coffee. They’ve been caught refilling with cholov stam. Why wouldn’t they?