m in Israel

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 101 through 150 (of 246 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bentchers – Bal Tashchis #775124
    m in Israel
    Member

    Again, if you don’t want it, don’t take it home. Usually the Baal Simcha is happy to have extra bentchers of “their” simcha. To this day I wish I took aside some of our bentchers before the Chasuna, as they were all taken, and the only ones my husband and I have are the ones one of my aunts took for us at the Chasuna! (We had a lot of single friends coming for dancing, and I think many of them wanted a souvenir, so we had a larger number of people taking bentchers.) Certainly if you are only going to put them in shaimos , don’t take them home!!

    in reply to: Jerusalem is not for Sale! #775037
    m in Israel
    Member

    Somewhat off topic, but the MBD song referenced in the title and the second post has nothing to do with Yom Yerushalayim. It was talking about the Mormon attempt to build a missionary center (officially a Mt. Scopus branch of their Brigham Young University) in Yerushalayim in the early 1980’s, hence the use of the term “not for sale” (they purchased a large plot of land to do it, with the encouragement of then mayor of Yerushalayim, Teddy Kollek). If you listen to the words of the song there is a reference that they should go back to “Utah”, the Mormom capital.

    in reply to: Are you in Israel? #776579
    m in Israel
    Member

    am yisroel chai — Actually, if you come and really join us (I mean make the BIG move!), the State of Israel will pay for your tickets.

    in reply to: Are you in Israel? #776559
    m in Israel
    Member

    Every “daled amos” another mitzva!!! (It is obvious from my screen name, isn’t it?)

    in reply to: What is the Halacha? #774041
    m in Israel
    Member

    aries — I think people were “reading in” to your question because everyone is assuming that this Halacha is pretty clear and well known (as you can see from the thread — no differences of opinion for once!). So it can’t be that you are “simply” asking what the Halacha is, because we assume you know what the Halacha is. Therefore either you are trying in a roundabout way to remind people about this Halacha, or you have an alternative motive.

    I do not see any “confessions” on this thread — on the contrary there are only people defending their innocence and offering explanations as to what you asked when you said “I have been wondering for a very long time how so many who said they were working people can manage to be on the CR during normal working hours”. So people are explaining how they manage it — people are taking it “personally” because you said you were wondering how people did it. Even in your last post you say “if you are personally guilty then that is something YOU should think about and consider before accusing someone else of “trampling” on halacha”, implying that those who accused you of “trampling” on Halacha in a different thread may be guilty of this. So far no one has said this is ok, and no one has admitted to doing it, so who are you addressing this accusation at?

    And as I pointed out earlier, the same people jumping to defend other Halachos are also pretty shtark in this post as well.

    Also, I don’t see anyone trying to figure out WHO you meant — people are just answering for themselves as far as I see, which is a pretty normal response to your question which specifically asks about posters on YWN!

    I’m sure you didn’t mean it this way, but your posts have come out very accusatory, and as by definition you are discussing the people who post here, obviously people are reacting because no one likes to be accused of wrongdoing (even when innocent).

    in reply to: How to prevent cynicism in children #773531
    m in Israel
    Member

    This sounds like a good time to discuss with your child that all people, even teachers and principals, sometimes make mistakes.

    However if your child is the victim of the abuse mentioned, please do not stop trying to protect your child!!!!! If you have tried everything from both ends (i.e. you taught your child anti-bullying techniques, and you have tried to get the school to intervene and help the bully get appropriate intervention) and the abuse continues, even if to you it is “only” verbal abuse and mild physical abuse, this may be a reason to take your kid out of the school. This has nothing to do with the protectzia issue, but rather that as a parent you must make sure your child is in a safe environment. It makes no differences if the reason that your child is not safe is due to protectzia, due to ineffective school policies, or due to bad mazal of having an uncontrollable bully in the class, in any case you must protect your child.

    in reply to: What is the Halacha? #774039
    m in Israel
    Member

    I mean to mention in my post that I am currently a SAHM, so even if I post during working hours in my time zone (which is clear from my name!), I am not guilty of gezeila!

    in reply to: What is the Halacha? #774038
    m in Israel
    Member

    aries, I think you misunderstood the posters who are arguing with you. The point is that there are no 2 sides to your question. EVERYONE agrees (or if someone doesn’t, please post!) that it is forbidden to do other things while being paid to work. So what is your question, meaning what is the argument the other way? The reason the “man walking behind a women” had so much discussion is because there were many people arguing that perhaps social expectations would be a more important factor then the Halacha, and there was some debate as to what the exact parameters of the Halach was. Here this is no question. If you read through this post you will see no one says it’s ok to post without permission while at work — no one even mentions any mitigating factors (except for adorable, with a side question) (And if you read the thread you can see that many of the posters who often post vehement and extreme defenses of other Halachos, have also posted unequivocally here that it is gezeila.)

    As far as if you are having trouble being dan lkaf zchus the posters here, I can give you many possible explanations:

    1)People are posting from all different time zones — what is during working hours for you may be different for them.

    2)People may work unusual hours even in your time zone.

    3)Some people work jobs with down time during which their boss allows them to do whatever they want, as long as they are there and available in case the phone rings or someone comes into the office, etc (and we can assume they have permission — I know a few people like that).

    4)Many people work by the hour or the job, rather than during the set hours of 9 — 5.

    5)People may have lunch breaks/ coffee breaks worked into their schedule, and post then.

    6)Some people are their own boss!!!

    The point is that there are many legitimate ways to be posting during the day, and there is no reason not to assume that your fellow posters are following Halacha. If someone is in fact stealing from their boss, and by reading your question they stop, then it was worth you posting it. But as far as in your mind, I really don’t see what the difficulty is in understand how people can manage it.

    in reply to: ????? ???"? for parents #1154767
    m in Israel
    Member

    thanks for posting

    in reply to: Was I Right or Stupid? #773468
    m in Israel
    Member

    adorable — I believe your impression is wrong. Gezel is forbidden from Jews and non Jews. The discussion here is about when the non-Jewish store owner/ worker made a mistake. If it was THEIR mistake then technically you are usually not obligated to correct them (although as has been clearly posted previously, there are many reasons to do so, particularly if it would make a Kiddush Hashem). If it was your mistake (you didn’t see the sign), then you certainly have no right not to pay.

    in reply to: Chillul H-shem….Definition #773008
    m in Israel
    Member

    mdd — I did not say Chillul Hashem in front of Goyim is not Chillul Hashem — see my second to last paragraph. My point was that it is only Chillul Hashem if there is something inherently wrong — either objectively or compared to what would be expected — with the action (in this case that Bnei Yisroel violated their treaty). It does not apply to doing “anything” that makes people look down on frum Jews. As I posted on a different thread, the logical conclusion to ignoring that detail (that there is something improper with the action) leads people down very strange paths. Someone posted on a different thread that if people think frum Jews are “not normal” due to our actions it would be a Chillul Hashem. If that is the case, then keeping Shabbos, Kosher, or Tznius in public, all of which are “not normal”, would be included in Chillul Hashem, which is obviously not the case!

    in reply to: Help me dry my tears #790634
    m in Israel
    Member

    MII — Big Mazel Tov!!! As everyone said — you are completely normal. I am always teary eyed for weeks after a baby, and that is without illness! Please make sure to sleep, sleep, sleep!!! My advice as I was reading through the beginning of your thread was to take the baby to bed with you, but I see you’ve done that already! Don’t worry so much about what you will do to her — mothers have been co-sleeping with babies for generations, and for many women it leads to more sleep for both mom and baby. Use your sechel, avoid heavy blankets or excessive pillows, and relax. Also, maybe you can find a metapalet who has “drop off” hours available who can take your 2 year old for a few hours for a few mornings so you can sleep.

    Health — The medical information you quoted actually contradicts your original post. The AAP recommends AGAINST supplementing with bottles in the early weeks, except when necessary. It is also not uncommon for young babies to refuse bottles (as you quote “this increases the likelihood that the baby will accept it”, meaning sometimes the baby does not accept it), while many babies who are exclusively nursed when young have no trouble switching to bottles between 2 and 4 months. A lot depends on the individual child’s personality and sucking habits. Your comments of “Your kid is way too young to be only demanding to have you” and “If you keep giving her your milk everytime she cries, she will never get used to a bottle” are not supported by the medical establishment — nor are they true in the experience of myself and many other nursing mothers who I know. I have also never heard the idea that an exhausted, starving baby will be more likely to accept a bottle then a calm one (” Eventually the kid will be so exhausted- she will take the bottle.”) It is more likely that eventually the baby will be so exhausted she’ll fall asleep — and wake up even more hungry after an hour! I usually enjoy all your medically sound posts, but it seems to be that this time you went with your personal feelings or perhaps experiences, without stopping to determine the current medical position on this issue.

    in reply to: Chillul H-shem….Definition #773005
    m in Israel
    Member

    mdd — Actually Dovid Hamelech gave over Shaul’s relatives to rectify a Chillul Hashem that had occurred previously and was causing a famine in the land. (The Urim V’Tumim told Dovid the reason.) The Chillul Hashem was giving the impression that Jews do not keep their deals (because 7 Givonim were killed in the city of Nov, and the Jews had a treaty with the Givonim) — a far cry from “something that makes the Goyim think less of frum Jews”.

    I haven’t learned the Rambam recently, and the concept is complex, but from my memory, this is how I understand it:

    The primary definition of Chillul Hashem is to commit an aveira intentionally. If this were done in front of a minyan of Jews (as DH mentions), it would be Chillul Hashem in public. That would be a Chillul Hashem according to all opinions.

    Additionally there is a secondary aspect to Chillul Hashem which is when someone acts in a way that decreases Hashem’s Kovod in the world. This is understood as to mean if someone acts in a way that is not befitting to him. He is doing something that is not perfectly right. I believe there is somewhat of a machlokes if this only applies when doing something objectively morally wrong, or even if it is only wrong because people expect more of that individual (i.e. the world holds Jews to a higher standard — perhaps due to antisemitism and they’re looking for problems, perhaps because they instinctively understand we have more obligations then them — either way if your action would be unbefitting to their perception of how you should behave)

    Finally there is the general conept of “yehi shem shamayim misahev al yadcha”, that a person has an obligation to make Hashem “loved” through his actions, and that people should say “fortunate is one who teaches his child Torah”. Colloquially this concept has also been lumped under the concepts of Kiddush Hashem/ Chillul Hashem, although I’m not sure it’s technically the same mitzva.

    in reply to: Avoiding Even The Appearance of Impropriety… #777610
    m in Israel
    Member

    “cottage cheese with olives”

    And cream cheese with olives and “gevina levana” with olives, too!

    (It is one of the shivas haminim after all. . .)

    in reply to: Proper Etiquette or Against Halacha? #773580
    m in Israel
    Member

    I’m actually with popa on this one! When I dated my husband he opened the car door for me, stood in front of it while I entered the car (i.e. with the car door between me and him), and then closed it for me. When we entered a door, he entered first, holding the door open for me behind him. If the door opened towards him, he held it until I entered the room. If it opened toward the outside, I would hold the door as I entered so he could let go and we wouldn’t have an awkward “traffic jam”! I knew this Halacha, and I assumed that’s how all people who were shomer halacha did it.

    mikehall — The “other guy’s” rebbe is quoted as saying he should open the car door. That is very easily done without violating this Halacha, as has been explained. He is not addressing the issue of going through doorways, which involves walking behind a woman, which is the Halachic problem.

    Middlepath — What “stringency” are you referring to that people are considering more important than manners? Not walking behind a woman is Halacha, not a “stringency”. I am completely confused by your original post. Why would someone not be obligated to keep Halacha unless he “mastered all of tanach, never speaks L”H. . . ” as you say? If this is Halacha, it is not something you can “take upon yourself” — we all took it upon ourselves to follow Halacha at Har Sinai!!!! (That doesn’t mean one can’t open a door under certain circumstances, such as when the door enters inward and the man goes first and holds it for her — as long as it follows Halacha)

    in reply to: Avoiding Even The Appearance of Impropriety… #777600
    m in Israel
    Member

    I’m with asyyeger on this one — if I have to go back and get something after I pay, that’s what I do, just to prevent any mis-impressions.

    Once it’s done with however, I don’t think you really have to worry, because as other posters said most likely people realized what happened. Often in stores with self-service drinks, individuals will take a drink after they pay.

    As for your other point, I have never heard that there is an issue of Chillul Hashem just because your actions seem “not normal” (assuming they are not objectively negative actions). Shabbos and Kashrus are “not normal”, too, but there is no Chillul Hashem in publicly doing it! Certainly tznius is not normal, but we don’t worry that when we walk in the streets in the summer goyim are thinking “are they normal to be dressing that way?” (And trust me, that’s exactly what they are thinking!) On the contrary, publicly performing miztvos is considered a Kiddush Hashem. I am not addressing whether you should have gone back (I think there is enough grounds to assume no Chillul Hashem was made), but just disagreeing with this argument that being viewed as strange would be in the category of Chillul Hashem.

    in reply to: What are the halachic ramifications #862171
    m in Israel
    Member

    am yisroel chai — Let her speak to ANY Rav she chooses and ask. I am confident there is no one who will tell her that she gets Kares, and she can relax. If speaking to a Rav doesn’t help, and she is still obsessing about this after a number of years, perhaps this is a psychological problem rather than a religious problem, and she should consider seeking professional help.

    in reply to: What are the halachic ramifications #862170
    m in Israel
    Member

    BasYisroel94 — If the Chometz was hefker, then it was not owned by a Jew, so what is the problem? (I’m not sure, but I actually think that there are some opinions that hefker items may be better than mechira.) Unless it was owned by a Jew on Pesach, and then made hefker after Pesach?

    in reply to: Housewives #779137
    m in Israel
    Member

    always here — thanks!! 🙂 I feel very lucky!

    2qwerty — Wow! I certainly never heard that one before. I know many girls who would LOVE to stay home with their kids. However many are also pragmatic and realize that in today’s world it is unfortunately not always financially feasible. Even if your husband is not in Kollel or Chinuch, it is often difficult to manage on only one salary. If you have a plan to support your family without your wife working, I would think that the girls would be breaking down your door!

    in reply to: Seminary in Israel, whats the deal? #770874
    m in Israel
    Member

    cshapiro — It seems like you’re upset at your sister/ parents for spending the money. But that doesn’t meant what the seminaries are doing is extortion – no one is forcing you to go!! If you feel it is not worth it you can choose not to go.

    mod 80: Most seminaries actually do not raise funds besides tuition, which is probably part of the reason tuition is so high compared to other educational institutions such as boys yeshivos and elementary/ high schools. They need to cover all their expenses (including numerous tiyulim and trips) from only the tuition.

    in reply to: women of Beit Shemesh #771011
    m in Israel
    Member

    As mentioned, this was not accepted by gedolim. However just to address the “Muslim” garb issue, it is not really a burka. It is a full body shawl. It gives a similar impression as a burka, but it is not “chukas hagoyim” or “looking like Muslims”. This is the same (small) group of mishugaim who throw stones down the hill at another frum community who they feel doesn’t maintain a high enough standard of tznius, so it’s not really surprising. . .

    in reply to: this was inevitable, these poor children #770764
    m in Israel
    Member

    always runs — You’re absolutely right except for one thing — these nuts are not simply against “society’s norms” — they are trying to fight physical reality!! Last I checked there were very clear biological differences between male and female . . . it is not a “choice” that parents (obnoxiously) make for their children.

    in reply to: Housewives #779125
    m in Israel
    Member

    I am a SAHM (stay at home mom) this year for the first time since I got married, and I am enjoying every second!!! I went to work from the day after sheva brachos until this year, taking off 6 weeks maternity leave when each of my kids were born. B”H I had a wonderful frum babysitter all the years for my babies and preschoolers after school, and was able to be home before my school aged kids got home from school. Despite this it was heart-wrenching, and the only thing that made it worth it for me was that I enabled my husband to learn in Kollel (and then work in chinuch). I often discussed with friends in a similar situation (i.e. husband is learning, we are not “being supported” by parents or the government but rather by us wives working) that when the seminaries discuss “mesiras nefesh for Torah” they should talk less about “histapkus bmuat” and the financial sacrifices, and more about the emotional difficulty of leaving your 6 week old baby with a babysitter!!!

    Due to various factors I am finally at home with my kids this year (and hopefully next as well — and then we’ll see what happens. . .), and although somehow I am just as busy as I always was, it is such a great feeling to be there all the time for my kids and my home. Former co-workers and friends keep asking me if I’m “going crazy” yet! I really don’t feel any lack of intellectual stimulation at all, and what I am doing is so meaningful.

    in reply to: how not to speak loshon hora without annoying others?! #769582
    m in Israel
    Member

    If you know the person will not respond well to telling them outright not to speak L”H, often the best thing to do is to quickly change the topic — it is actually easier then it seems to interrupt someone with “Oh! I just remembered I really wanted to tell you. . .” — at worse they’ll think you are being rude, but if your new topic is interesting enough then the moment will pass!

    I stumbled on this approach many years ago by accident when I was in camp. There was a big push to be careful, and one thing going around was that if someone is starting to say something that sounds like L”H, you can use a hint to stop it. A popular one was “I smell smoke.” Well, I was with a group of girls who started speaking some L”H and I said “I smell smoke.” What I didn’t realize was these particular girls had never heard about this phrase, so they took me literally, and decided to go out of the bunk and check around. I didn’t bother explaining because the purpose was served anyway — everyone was distracted and the conversation was over!

    Since then I discovered that you don’t usually need something that dramatic — conversations naturally change course all the time (just look at a typical CR thread!).

    Obviously this won’t help if someone is specifically trying to tell you something — that would probably require a more direct approach, as ZeesKite discussed. However for the L”H that is constantly just coming up in conversation this works.

    in reply to: Desperate Deceptions #769967
    m in Israel
    Member

    I didn’t read either book, but it sounds like it may be a decision for each parent to make knowing their own child.

    I just wanted to comment on the Holocaust comparison. Although it is a different question, as some posters explained above, I would agree that parents may want to monitor at what age their kids read which Holocaust books as well. It is not a matter of something necessarily being appropriate/ inappropriate. It is simply that children at different stages are emotionally and psychologically ready for different information. Some more graphic Holocaust books may not be appropriate for preteens or even young teenagers.

    The books mentioned above may be wonderful, serve an important purpose, etc, but that doesn’t mean it is appropriate for every child at every age.

    in reply to: Midaber Ivrit??? #770154
    m in Israel
    Member

    DRB — I don’t want to get serious on a light thread, but. . .

    Do you plan on living here long term, or are you just here for a few years? If it’s a short term deal, I agree with you. Or if you are retired and don’t have young children.

    If not, it is probably well worth your effort to try to develop a functional Hebrew. It will make many aspects of your life easier, help with job opportunities, and certainly make a big difference if you have kids here and need to deal with the school system. If you don’t speak the language, you are making it much more likely for your kids to always be “outsiders”. I have met a number of people who made Aliyah many years ago who say they strongly regret not having put more effort into developing their Hebrew when they first arrived.

    in reply to: Midaber Ivrit??? #770125
    m in Israel
    Member

    I think this one is in The Bamboo Cradle – a girl needed to buy some sewing needles (machatim), so she went into a “kol bo” and asked for “mechutanim” (in-laws). The man behind the counter said “Do I look like a shadchan?! I don’t sell mechutanim!” She still didn’t get it, and said “but I saw some in your window. . .”

    And of course the classic: “ani lo tachas omed”

    in reply to: Dismay – Japanese Injustice Travesty and Tefillos #767247
    m in Israel
    Member

    charlie hall – Why do you keep reposted the misinformation that these boys admitted to smuggling? Where did you get your information from? If you have been following the case at all the point is the boys did NOT know they were doing anything illegal — and the courts have acknowledged that, which is why they were only convicted of negligence rather than smuggling.

    Their story, which the Japanese court system has ACCEPTED, is that they thought they were carrying religious antiquities which are exempt from tax and completely LEGAL to be brought into the country. However due to the high value of the items as well as their delicate nature, the items were packed in false bottoms to protect them and prevent theft.

    NO ONE involved in the case has rejected this story. The issue is that the judge has ruled that there was enough about the story that should have given the boys ground to be suspicious, and therefore their lack of suspicion constitutes a form of negligence. This is very different from the version you keep posting stating that they thought they were smuggling something else.

    However, I agree with those pointing out that this knee jerk reaction to criticize the Japanese justice system seems dishonest. It is not a matter of “wasting energy” trying to “defend” the Japanese justice system. It is a matter of not distorting facts. These boys were not convicted of the more serious charge of drug smuggling, under which they could have faced life in prison. Even under this conviction, Yaakov Yosef was sentenced to 6 years, when the prosecution was asking for 13 — and it is likely that he will be extradited to Israel within the next 10 months. The judges also used leniency in terms of how they calculated time served. I am certainly sad about this verdict, and continue to daven for these boys, but it is hard to justify all this vitriol against the Japanese, who do not by any account appear to be singling out these boys in an unfair way, according to their laws.

    in reply to: Pushover=Tzadeikes? #783410
    m in Israel
    Member

    Th OP listed a bunch of character traits

    “forgives and forgets,” (possibly a d’oraisa requirement)

    “does constant chesed to the point of being taken advantage of,”

    “keeps quiet when insulted,” (see above quoted chazal “hanealavim vainom onim. . .”)

    “is kind to the mean person….” (numerous Mitzvos requiring kindness that is not dependent on whether the other individual is “mean” or not)

    Everyone seems to be responding the the “being taken advantage of” part, but it seems to me that the type of person who has all the other qualities is probably also choosing to do the Chessed because it is the right thing to do. Obviously one must know the appropriate Halachos and guidelines regarding Chessed. (There is even a maximum amount of Tzedakah that one is permitted to give.) But the general description is one that according to Torah hashkafa is proper, nothing to do with “touchy feely”.

    in reply to: Why are some Jews against Israel? #913171
    m in Israel
    Member

    600kilobear — As is clear from my previous posts I am in no way a Zionist. However some of your posts are over the top, in my opinion. It is absolutely true that the current “medina” is very secular, but your implication that the culture is not primarily Jewish is not accurate. In fact one of the main redeeming factors of the state of Israel as a “Jewish state” is the fact that even the secular Jews here are much closer to Torah and Mitzvos then in other places, partly as a result of the “Jewish” culture, much of which is due to the strong fighting done by the Yishuv Hayashan and its leaders in the early years.

    Numerous studies have shown that the rate of non-religious Jews in Israel who fast on Yom Kippur, have a Pesach Seder, and light Shabbos candles far exceed the rates in the US. A secular Jew in Israel is more likely to keep some sort of Kosher, to avoid Chometz on Pesach, to celebrate Purim, and even to shake lulav and esrog. All of these activities may be “cultural” rather than completely religious, but obviously the Mitzvos have value, and these Jews are that much closer to eventually understanding their meaning.

    Unfortunately time is chipping away at much of the status quo that was in favor of Yiddishkeit, but there still exists much to be thankful for. Shabbos is recognized (although this is an area that has gotten much worse in the past few decades), and one must go out of his way to find real treif food. I recently had to be in a mall and commented to my husband that despite the fact that 80% of the people around did not seem religious, all of the restaurants in the “food court” — about 12 — had some sort of Kahrus certificate. When taking a taxi a few weeks before Pesach, the clearly Chiloni driver began to tell me about how his Pesach cleaning was going — and he didn’t meant spring cleaning! He was discussing scrubbing down his oven and fridge to remove Chometz.

    Again, this is a complex topic, and the bottom line is that I think we can all agree that the best solution to this discussion would be the coming of Moshiach Tzidkeinu and the geulah!

    in reply to: Pushover=Tzadeikes? #783405
    m in Israel
    Member

    It doesn’t make it ok for the one taking advantage. However it does make a difference to the one on the receiving end. This is true about many inyanim of good middos. For example, it is a aveira d’oraisa to take revenge or bear a grudge. So if someone wrongs you, and you forgive them according to Halacha, that doesn’t mean that what they did was ok. It’s just that we believe Hashem can give everyone what is coming to them — it is not our job to do the accounting.

    So I’ll agree with popa — is this person really a pushover, and doing all these things because they can’t stand up for themselves, or is this someone who is strong enough to rise about the pettiness of others and do the right thing anyway? Chazal actually praise in very strong terms “those who are insulted, and don’t insult back, who hear their shame and don’t respond”

    Lehavdil one of my favorite quotes from Frances Hodgson Burnett is

    “There’s nothing so strong as rage — except for what makes you hold it in.” There is a difference between being a pushover and being someone with strength of character. But in either case it has nothing to do with making the doers actions any more correct.

    in reply to: Why are some Jews against Israel? #913158
    m in Israel
    Member

    Charliehall — Last I checked the Central Powers lost WW I to the Allies, so I’m not sure what that fact regarding the Ottoman Empire has to do with the creation of Medinat Yisroel over 30 years later (and with another world war in between that further altered the political landscape). Throughout the cycle of history much larger Jewish populations were expelled from virtually every country in Europe at some point or another. And in recent history the only place where Jews were forcibly expelled from their homes was in Gush Katif, under the rule of Medinat Yisroel, unfortunately.

    In general I don’t really think “what ifs” regarding history are too valid — there are too many factors. But once you start with what “probably” would have happened, a person can theoretically come up with many other scenarios. Perhaps had the early Zionists not forced the hand of the British empire through their armed resistance, Israel would currently be under British rule like Gibraltar. Perhaps Israel would have remained under some sort of Arabic rule that allowed freedom of religion for the Jews living there, as there was in most of the Arab world before the 1940’s (including Iran and Syria, whose large Jewish communities experienced tremendous hardship after the formation of Medinat Yisroel).

    I am not trying to discuss the core issue of why people have problems with Zionism and the modern state of Israel. I am simply pointing out that many of these presumptions are not necessarily true.

    Similarly, I strongly disagree that the “only thing” preventing Hamas rule over Israel is Medinat Yisroel. The “only thing” preventing Hamas rule over Israel is Hashem’s protection. There is no reason to assume that had Israel never been formed, Hamas like groups would be in control, and even with the State of Israel the situation right now is pretty precarious, especially now with this “unity” deal.

    As someone who actually lives here, I have appreciation for the Israeli government in a similar way that I had appreciation for the U.S. government when I lived there. A democratic and functioning government provides the derech hatevah security and law and order that allows me to be free to live the life I believ in , and have a good quality of life in Artzeinu Hakadosh. I pay my taxes, follow the laws, and express appreciation whenever I meet anyone serving our country (as I did in the US). And I certainly daven for the safety of the young Jews putting their lives on the line to save others. But that does not mean I agree with those who view the formation of a Jewish state here in Israel as the beginning of any sort of geulah, nor do I believe this scenario is what we have been davening for over the past centuries. I even believe that many aspects of what goes on here today may be worse when done under a Jewish government.

    One can have serious Hashkafic problems with the Zionist belief system, and object to it, without being accused of “anti-Zionist” rhetoric and lack of hakaras hatov.

    m in Israel
    Member

    Charlie:

    “The newspaper has every right to maintain their religious values”

    Knowingly publishing deliberately doctored photographs is a religious value?

    Did you read the rest of my post? I was addressing your assertion that they have a responsibility to print the original picture. Their religious values prevent the printing of women in their paper. You may disagree with this concept, but they have a right to it. To print the doctored picture was in my opinion wrong — as I stated in my original post, they should not have printed it at all if it did not meet their criterion. However the fact that they made a mistake and published it does not require them to now print the original picture, as you propose as the “only” way for them to show true regret.

    in reply to: Why are some Jews against Israel? #913147
    m in Israel
    Member

    lovebeingjewish —

    As you seem to truly be machshiv the tremendous mitzva of yishuv eretz yisroel, as well as the other mitzvos you can do only here, why aren’t you living here yet? (Is seems from your other posts that you live in NY, although perhaps I’m wrong)

    in reply to: Why are some Jews against Israel? #913144
    m in Israel
    Member

    lovebeingjewish —

    Most, if not all, of the mainstream Orthodox gedolim, even among the most extreme “yeshivish” and “chassidish” elements do not condone anti-Israel rallies in the U.S. There are always crazy individuals looking for excitement, both in the U.S. and in Israel, who don’t have the backing of any gedolim. I agree that it is a Chillul Hashem.

    The current state of affairs in Israel however, is also unfortunately a tremendous Chillul Hashem. The primary Halachic definition of Chillul Hashem is the knowing desecration of Mitzvos by Jews. This occurs frequently in Israel, where identifying Jews who know about Shabbos, Kashrus, etc. nonetheless violate these Mitzvos, often in public.

    Religious Jews can practice freely in many countries throughout the world, and were able to practice their religion freely in Eretz Yisroel in many periods of history before the establishment of the State of Israel — that really has nothing to do with the issue.

    It is a tremendous zchus to live here, and I appreciate the role of the Israeli government and IDF in enabling us to do so al pi derech hatevah. However what we are truly waiting for is the geulah shelaima, and the true fulfillment of the nevuah of “vishavu banim ligvulam” and a “yerushalahim HABINUYA”

    in reply to: Why are some Jews against Israel? #913138
    m in Israel
    Member

    This is a huge complex topic that I’m not going to address in this forum. However just to clarify the misconception in your question: no one is against Eretz Yisroel or denies the fact that there are many Mizvos involved in both living and being here. Many do have objections to the State of Israel, and do not necessarily view it as a positive development in Jewish history. Some small groups have hashkafic/ halachic objections to moving to Eretz Yisroel before Yemos Hamashiach.

    Many of the groups in Eretz Yisroel with the strongest objections to the State, who take no money from the state, do not participate in elections, etc., are also among the most ardent lovers of the land. Members of many of these groups will not leave Eretz Yisroel for any reason, even missing simchos of relatives, etc., and even avoiding traveling to areas that are “safek Eretz Yisroel”, like Acco or Eilat. Many in these Yerushalmi communities are descendents of those who came to Eretz Yisroel in the period of the “Yishuv Hayashan”, well before the influx of secular Zionists in the WW II era, and before the declaration of the state.

    m in Israel
    Member

    “The problem is that the only true atonement would be to publish the original photograph, undoctored.”

    I strongly disagree. The newspaper has every right to maintain their religious values, even if others think they are crazy. It is called “freedom of religion” — they have no obligation to print the picture. Their mistake was that if a picture didn’t meet their standards, they should not have published it, rather than publishing an edited version. Had there been no picture published, there would be no problem.

    I fail to understand your logic that atonement for this requires them to give up on their principles. I would say their apology was pretty well expressed, and perhaps could be made stronger by expressing a commitment to refrain from doctoring photos in the future, and simply choosing to use those pictures which meet their standards in their original form.

    in reply to: Who's going to be wearing blue and white tomorrow? #943824
    m in Israel
    Member

    Yes, but Yom Hazikaron (Memorial Day for fallen IDF soldiers) is Monday.

    in reply to: Second Marriages & Hadlokas Neiros #845314
    m in Israel
    Member

    Generally once you light a certain number you don’t decrease that number.

    Also a person can accept upon themselves to light additional candles as well for various reasons, so if you want to light for your step children there probably is no problem doing so (obviously check with your Posek). I know the wife of a Chashuv posek who adds candles for each grandchild as Hodaah to Hashem, I don’t see why this would be different. (But I’m not so familiar with the halachos — just speaking from observation)

    in reply to: How To Raise A Boy? Whats It All about? #765158
    m in Israel
    Member

    Yes, it’s true about the positioning while diapering (I’m mom to 4 boys).

    As SJSinNYC said, remember that although the generalizations are true when you look at groups (more wild, energetic, less verbal, etc.), when dealing with any one individual there are no hard and fast rules. You need to try to understand your individual child’s temperament and personality, not the general trends of boys vs. girls.

    in reply to: Snopes Bible #764802
    m in Israel
    Member

    The whole success of snopes is dependent on their accuracy. The reason people use it is because of their reputation, therefore it is in their best interest to be as accurate as possible. Obviously they are human and make mistakes, but if they would continuously make mistakes people would start catching them and they’d be out of business. Therefore they spend money trying to accurately research their info.

    mbachur — snopes is a sight that attempts to verify the accuracy (or non accuracy!) of rumors, stories, urban legends, etc.

    in reply to: Getting Married & Trying To Decide To Have TV Or Not #764310
    m in Israel
    Member

    oomis — You make a very broad generalization, and as with most generalizations it can’t be accurate. Perhaps you meant to say “SOME kids who do not have one. . . “, which I would agree with. It is definitely not everyone, and I believe a lot depends on how well you communicate your value system to your kids. I grew up without TV in my home, and I NEVER went to a friend’s house “for the express purpose of watching.” On occasion, I did watch TV at a friend’s house when I was there anyway and she wanted to watch. Similarly if I was babysitting at a home with a TV I would occasionally turn it on (although I was more likely to head for their bookshelves!) BTW my parents allowed this, requesting that I use good judgement and avoid shows that may be inappropriate.

    And even if a child does watch TV at a friend’s house, as I said in my previous post, it is not likely that the child watching at a friend is watching more TV overall, or watching worse shows, than one with a TV in their home.

    in reply to: Getting Married & Trying To Decide To Have TV Or Not #764296
    m in Israel
    Member

    As many posters said, it’s a lot easier to bring in a TV if you feel like you miss it rather than getting rid of it once it’s a habit, so why not start out without? Additionally, it will definitely enhance your shana rishona in many ways to not have a TV to fill up your time.

    As far as kids sneaking TV, that is a very common accusation, and I find it interesting. My experience is that kids from both TV and non TV homes will attempt to push limits as they reach certain ages. For kids without TV’s that may mean going to their friends to watch, and for those with TV’s it means watching shows their parents don’t approve of — either sneaking it in their own home or by a friend. I once taught 6th grade in an MO school where almost all the students had TV’s, and when we were discussing the vocabulary word “discretion” about half the class said “oh, like ‘viewer discretion advised'” before a show, right? I have a feeling most of these parents did not know what their kids were watching. . . .

    I don’t see any reason to assume that shows “sneaked” at a friend’s house would be any worse than the shows they would be watching had you owned a TV. If the other parents set the same type of limits you would, then these would be shows your kids would see if you had a TV. And if the other parents were more permissive, why would you having a TV in your home prevent your kids from joining their friends watching things you don’t approve of?

    Your experience in no way contradicts that. You experienced friends from homes without TV’s coming over to watch by you. But in the final analysis, did these friends watch more or less TV than kids who watched at home? Did they watch worse shows?

    Bottom line is that if you live in a neighborhood where most families have TV’s, you will not have control over what your kids watch, whether you have a TV in your home or not! The best you can do it hope other parents share your values, and maybe even discuss things like what shows you prefer your kids not to watch, and then try really hard to pass those values to your kids, so that eventually they will self-monitor as well.

    BTW, I remember very clearly on my 8th grade graduation trip (I went to an OOT BY, so it was a mixed group), it was the girls from homes WITH TVs who turned on the TVs in the hotel rooms, and with only a few exceptions the girls from non TV homes did not watch and actually protested.

    in reply to: Sefiras HaOmer Issues #763204
    m in Israel
    Member

    Did they count with a Beracha in the morning? Many people count every morning as an extra precaution in case they forget somehow one night.

    in reply to: Refeshers Course On T.H'M #763304
    m in Israel
    Member

    Irgun Shiuri Torah does organize yearly refresher courses all over the world. In addition, they sell numerous sets of tapes/ CDs by many different presenters for both men and women on this topic. I personally LOVE the series by Reb. Zehava Braunstein, a’h “Halachos and Hashkofos for the Jewish Married Woman” sold by Irgun Shuiri Torah — I try to listen to the whole set every year or so. Besides being very clear and specific she is so inspiring. Of course a live class, especially where you can ask questions is much better, but if you can’t afford it or find one where you live, maybe look into purchasing one of these sets.

    in reply to: Yom Hashoah…why do charaidim/right wing orthodox not "celebrate"? #762665
    m in Israel
    Member

    oomis – I think that you are missing the point of those discussing Tisha B’Av as our national day of mourning. The point is not that we don’t remember the Holocaust, but rather the day to mourn it is on Tisha B’Av itself. The point is that the Holocaust is the most recent manifestation of the fact that we are in Galus, and so on Tisha B’av it is part of the tragedy. As you mentioned, since the Shoah is somewhat more personal to us, by thinking about and discussing the Shoah on Tisha B’av, and then realizing that this, too is a result of the Churban, it will help us achieve that deep sense of mourning that is so incumbent on us to feel. We were always encouraged to read Holocaust biographies during the three weeks and on Tisha B’Av. Additionally, I remember once hearing a shiur discussing that Tisha B’Av is also an appropriate time to mourn personal tragedies in our families and communities, which are also a result of the lack of Hashraas Hashichina in our lives due to galus.

    I am not sure about your historical generalizations however. I believe the number of Jews killed during the period surrounding the Churban Bais Sheni was in the multiple millions as well. And in terms of the “systematic and organized” murder of Jews, the Spanish Inquisition was pretty systematic and organized, as were the pogroms during Tach V’Tat (although obviously the actual numbers killed do not compare). I am not trying in any way to Chas V’Shalom minimize the Holocaust. Simply to point out that this has been a long and difficult galus, and the point of Tisha B’Av is to mourn all the aspects of it.

    In terms of Yom Hashoah itself, I believe a previous poster has mentioned that the complete “official” name of the day is “Yom HaShoah V’Hagevurah”, and it was picked because it was the day associated with the Warsaw Ghetto uprising. Many of the early secular Zionists were embarrassed by the Holocaust and felt that the Jews went “like sheep to the slaughter”. The uprising was something they could take pride in, as it was the type of “gevurah” they approved off. (Tangentially there certainly was a tremendous amount of spiritual gevurah under the harshest circumstances throughout the Holocaust. . .) So even if one would feel that for some reason the Holocaust needed a separate day of commemoration, there are actual problems with the specific day, from a Torah hashkafa.

    in reply to: Clarity? #761945
    m in Israel
    Member

    I’m not sure what you mean by clarity, but MANY people do not “know” right away, or even after a few dates, and as aries described it’s a gradual process. Even after getting engaged, a large number of people, if not most, have moments of uncertainty, which is totally normal, and assuming they are not specific concerns and issues, are usually par for the course!

    A suggestion: perhaps instead of davening for “clarity”, which is not necessarily a real experience, daven for the siyatta dishmayah to make the right decision, which is really what you are looking for.

    Hatzlachah!

    in reply to: shidduchim and weight….. #906715
    m in Israel
    Member

    To the OP (if you’re still reading!), and those like her:

    I was always on the heavy side and got married at age 20, B”H. There are plenty of guys out there looking for more than weight, and even many who find girls attractive even when they are not skinny.

    In Malky Feig’s Mountain Climbers 2 she has a beautiful mashal (discussed with regards to someone having difficulty in shidduchim due to a medical issue). Basically, when you are doing a puzzle the easiest piece to match is the corner piece because it has 2 straight sides and less options to match it to. Shouldn’t having more options make it easier to match up? The answer is that when you want to “choose” something, having more options is better as it gives you more choices. But if you want to “find” a specific thing, less choices narrows the field and makes it easier. We are not trying to “choose” a shidduch. We are trying to “find” the one specific individual who is right for us. If you have less choices due to circumstances that Hashem put you in, He is making it easier for you to find the right one by narrowing down the ones you must sort through until you find him! When he does come along, he will be attracted to the way Hashem made you! (Obviously we have to do reasonable hishtadlus, but it seems clear from your post that you are doing that.)

    May you all be zoche to find him quickly!

    in reply to: shidduchim and weight….. #906713
    m in Israel
    Member

    A few points that should be obvious, but don’t seem to be!

    1) Most girls of shidduchim age do try to be as attractive as possible. However not everyone is built the same way, and not everyone can be super thin! There are many medical reasons besides the few mentioned that prevent girls from being a size 6 or below, and even perfectly healthy women come in various sizes. Being heavy is NOT an automatic indication that one doesn’t care about how she looks, or one does not have self control, or is not healthy enough. Two individuals who eat the same food and exercise equivalent amounts may look very different. The judgmental tone of so many posters is very disturbing.

    2) Body shape changes throughout life for everyone, and especially for women having kids. A previous poster discussed her experience loosing weight with her pregnancies, and actually that is not so uncommon (I had the same experience and researched it a bit). Actually heavy women as a whole gain significantly less weight during pregnancy than very thin ones. A woman’s body is programed to store fat during pregnancy (specifically on her hips) in order to provide nutrient sources while nursing. Someone who already has those stores tends not to store as much new fat as others. Just like the poster, I lost weight in the initial stages of my pregnancies, and then gained back only a bit more then I lost, which was less than the weight of my babies! Of course the genetic and metabolic factors that enabled a woman to be super skinny to begin with may work in her favor and help her loose the baby weight faster, too. Bottom line is to keep this weight concept in perspective: it is a very superficial characteristic of a girl, and a transient one at that!

    in reply to: How to remain neutral with the boys in college #758821
    m in Israel
    Member

    good.jew — It does not seem that the OP’s main concern with regard to negiah was the handshaking issue. (These are classmates — presumably the handshaking dilemma has passed for the most part!) It seems she is more concerned about working on group projects, etc.. where other situations of negiah arise.

    I do agree that there is no reason whatsoever to lie, and it is highly inappropriate (and probably against Halacha) to do so. As other posters said, there is no reason why one cannot politely and matter of factly explain this issue the same way one would explain not eating non-kosher refreshments. The worst case scenario is a few strange looks, and some classmates who think you’re a bit strange (which may not be such a bad thing. . . )

Viewing 50 posts - 101 through 150 (of 246 total)