mdd1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 201 through 250 (of 424 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Medinah #2168842
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avira and Ujm, I replied, but the Mod did not let it through.

    in reply to: Medinah #2168711
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avira, Reb Yoel held that Zionism was a pirtza and he was allowed to say things which are not emes to fight it. Get it?
    And do not make out of him a big mekubal either.

    in reply to: Medinah #2168710
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avira, have you looked at any sources besides the Satmar ones?!? Maharal does not say what you claim he said — it is a a big stretch, to put it mildly. Check it inside. The ta’anah about the UN and therfore the Arabs not counting — Reb Moshe held like that.

    in reply to: Medinah #2168707
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avira, what about people talking during chazoras ha’shaztz, also a public abrogation of the will of H’ — are you as upset? What about if there are groups of frei Yidden in chutz la’Aretz — are the anti-Zionists as outraged as they are about the medinah?

    in reply to: Medinah #2168402
    mdd1
    Participant

    Always, what in the world are you trying to say? Maybe learn the about Yehu or the rebellion against Atalya or about king Yoshia?

    in reply to: Medinah #2168356
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avira, the choimer of the aveirah makes a difference.
    Also, if there are groups of frei Yidden in chutz la’Aretz, is it chillul Ha’SHem or it is only when they live in Eretz Yisroel it is a problem?

    in reply to: Medinah #2168153
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, Shmittah and trumos&maaseros are de’Rabbonon nowdays.
    In the US they would never ever agree to directly support that large chunk of population in kollel.

    in reply to: Jews Who Lived Under Muslim Rule #2156595
    mdd1
    Participant

    Shimon Nodel, the historians say something along the Ujm’s lines, not yours. So, tone down the rhetoric, maybe.

    in reply to: Haredim denounce Ben Gvir Temple Mount provocation #2154842
    mdd1
    Participant

    RBZS, how do you know he did not go to the mikve and went to the wrong areas? Also, not making a brocha does not invalidate the tevila.

    in reply to: 2 States #2149353
    mdd1
    Participant

    Marxist, who said that the Israel would have the strength to fight off Germany, especially if they (the Germans) had gotten there full force? The Nazis almost felled the Soviet Union. It is ridiculous Zionist propaganda that : “Had there been a state, it would have prevented the Holocaust.”. Who said it would have?

    in reply to: 2 States #2148324
    mdd1
    Participant

    Also, why do you not look at the famous case of Eliyahu ha’Novi that I brought down? He spoke badly only about a part of the Northern Kingdom of Aseres Ha’Shevotim.

    in reply to: 2 States #2148320
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, I am not telling you my chiddushim. Adas Korach? You find Klal Yisroel castigated all over Tanach — because there was a big toeles in saying and writing down those statements. When therei is no toeles though …The chiddush that it applies down to a small city is from the Chafetz Chaim. Just read carefully what I wrote.

    in reply to: 2 States #2148177
    mdd1
    Participant

    About Eliyahu — it is in Rashi in Melochim 1, perek 19, on the posuk 16. There is also a Zohar about this episode which says that even though there is not a better tzadik than Eliyahu in all the generations, but he became very bad in the eyes of HKBH when he said kategoriya on the Jewish people.

    in reply to: 2 States #2148175
    mdd1
    Participant

    I remember seeing it in the Chaftez Chaim’s seforim. I have to go back and find the exact places. Also, the mekoros from Chazal. The famous case of Eliyahu ha’Novi when he said that bnei Yisroel violated your bris and killed your neviim. He was obvously talking about reshoim. And the case of Hoshea ha’Novi from the beginning of perek Ha’isha in Pesochim. He was also talking about the reshoim.

    in reply to: 2 States #2148140
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avira, the halochah applies to speaking about the Chareidim also. Obviously. Try to read what I wrote — it is a din about a tzibur.

    in reply to: 2 States #2148112
    mdd1
    Participant

    Ujm and Avira, there is such an issur as limud kategoriya on Klal Yisroel. Namely, if a group of Jews (even if they are reshoim and even if we are talking about only the people of one town) do something wrong, it is forbidden to mention it unless there is big toeles in doing so. For sure, it is forbidden to make up slander about them.

    in reply to: 2 States #2147737
    mdd1
    Participant

    Also, Avirah (of Phylistyn?), your claim that thet never bothered the old Yishuv is sheker. They never bothered them the way the later bothered the Zionists.
    Buddy, when you “flipped out” you lost your “balance” a bit. Time to work on it.

    in reply to: 2 States #2147734
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, I said they did not start the violence. The Altalina was kind of killing be’din malkus. I do not accept everything Reb Chaim said, and even him -you have to know how far he meant. Again, I do not deny the Der Yassin — but you have to look at the context! Why just jump to accuse other Jews — “bo u’ree ma bein poshei Yisroel le’neviey Umos ha’Oilam…”! I know many of them were reshoim ben adam le’Mokom, but you do not have to slander them like that! Comparing them to the Nazis and the Japanese invaders!

    in reply to: 2 States #2147685
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, and the expulsion from the rst of the Arab villages happened shortly after Der Yassin — during the Israeli independence war. The Arabs were asking for it — big time.

    in reply to: 2 States #2147683
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, Der Yasssin happened after almost 30 years of Arab attacks and in response to the murder of thousands Jews that had been slaughtered right before that! Historians you are getting it from are the revisionist, or lefty of anti-Semitic types. Again shame on you!

    in reply to: 2 States #2147600
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah ,the Arabs started the violence and were responsible for the most of it. The Jews only responded. Shame on you!

    in reply to: 2 States #2147599
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, go learn some history (even from non-Israeli sources). Stop with your outrageous lies! The Arabs officially rejected the partition plans a number of times.

    in reply to: Cherem on sefer “Pshuto Shel Mikra” #2145471
    mdd1
    Participant

    Catch yourself (indeed!), the mainstream opinion is that we are free to reject Midrashei Chazal? Who told you that?!?
    Avirah, (with his kanaus) do you have anything to answer to the Shlomo’s story with the two Battei Din in E. Yisroel?

    in reply to: Taking a Kulah from Across the Aisle #2145126
    mdd1
    Participant

    Also, I agree with Aviira.

    in reply to: Taking a Kulah from Across the Aisle #2145124
    mdd1
    Participant

    Yabia, following the Torah properly is an IMPERATIVE ISSUE for Klal Yisroel.
    1, if one Rov holds that something is muttar and 5 other Rabboinim hold it is not, it not just muttar.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2139379
    mdd1
    Participant

    DaMoshe, which terrible situation?

    in reply to: Barbaric Civilization #2138669
    mdd1
    Participant

    Philosopher, vaccines have been saving lives! Stop with propaganda initiated by the barbarians.

    in reply to: Barbaric Civilization #2138668
    mdd1
    Participant

    How about the mitsva of ‘lo sechaye kol neshama” regarding the 7 nations of Kena’an? Mitsva to execute those who are chayav misa? Kanolm pogim bo? Etc. AAQ and others, what do you say?

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2138608
    mdd1
    Participant

    In the overwhelming majority of cases it is the ancestors who went off or were forced off.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2138605
    mdd1
    Participant

    It is by far, by far more of a second (the ancestors going off) than the first.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2138598
    mdd1
    Participant

    Yabia Omer, you are so clueless about how the Ashkenazim are! It is impossible to keep in the fold those 80% without compromising Halocha. Nobody was mafkir them, they did it to themselves or their ancestors went off and the descendants are not easy to repair.

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2138323
    mdd1
    Participant

    Jackk, when there are a lot of Jews together, like in Uman on R. H, then it is different. It is difficult to attack a crowd.
    Regarding the Chabad it is a blatant, verifiable propaganda lie!

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2138289
    mdd1
    Participant

    AAQ, no, no, you can not let those horrible Russians bomb anything even the Hitler’s bunker in Berlin. Oh, those Russkies!

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2138287
    mdd1
    Participant

    YO, I already answered your question. “The Yeshiva world” is an idiom with a certain meaning. Stop pretending you do not understand. AAQ, the same goes for you.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2138212
    mdd1
    Participant

    When they say “the Yeshiva world” they mean what I wrote. Just explainnig the idioms to YO who pretends not to know them.

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2138203
    mdd1
    Participant

    Jackk, AAQ, do you know that it is sakonas nefoshos to wear a yarmulke in the street in Ukraine?!? In Russia it is also dangerous, but in Ukraine it is worse.

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2138202
    mdd1
    Participant

    Jackk, what in the world are you talking about? How many shuls are there already in Ukraine? And again, Putin does not target neither the shuls, nor the Jews ,nor the Ukrainian civilians. Stop with the propaganda hysteria.

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2137875
    mdd1
    Participant

    According to AAQ, the US has not gone to war in the last 80 years. Yep, sure.

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2137645
    mdd1
    Participant

    And partially to philosopher.

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2137568
    mdd1
    Participant

    You have been swept by the ignorant and biased media frenzy. Learn the true facts.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2137523
    mdd1
    Participant

    Yabia Omer, The Yeshiva world is BMG, Mir, Beis Ha’Talmud, Chaim Berlin etc. Do not pretend you did not know this. Having a cheilek in Torah and being a Torah Jew are two different things. Do not pretend to be that ignorant. Is an OTD fellow a Torah Jew? However, potentially he has a cheilek in Torah.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136638
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avira, what’s your point?

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136600
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avira, wearing tzitzis and a yarmulke are enough reminders of Jewishness, strictly speaking.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136437
    mdd1
    Participant

    Yabia, what do you mean by “the Sefardi derech”? We do not know what you refer to.
    Ujm, Rav Shach was in theory “land for peace”. Le’ma’ase he was strongly opposed to it as he did not trust the Arabs. I think he was also opposed to joining a left-wing government in Israel.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136357
    mdd1
    Participant

    UJM, you are totally misinformed about what Rav Shach held.
    Yabia, Shas was lead by Chacham Ovadia. He did not know about the Sefardi mesora? Or according to you, the Sefardi mesorah means kullos through the roof and anything goes, chas ve’sholom?

    in reply to: POLL hocul-zeldin #2132236
    mdd1
    Participant

    Ujm, Germany is a separate story. There the assimilation started much earlier. Yaakov Doe was referring to the Eastern- European Jews who immigrated to the US.

    in reply to: Putin’s attempted annexation of four Ukrainian provinces #2129305
    mdd1
    Participant

    Chiefshmerel, there is also a statue of Symyon Petlura in Kiev. His army did a repeat of the Tach ve’Tat in 1918-1920.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2126912
    mdd1
    Participant

    I meant, the north-eastern parts threw off the yoke of the Mongols.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2126903
    mdd1
    Participant

    The Ukr. nationalists did not want to be friends with Russia — they hate Russia. Always…, the vote took place in 2014 only in Crimea.
    Yea, a Russian troll who reveals to you that it is dangerous to wear a yarmulke in the street in Russia.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2126902
    mdd1
    Participant

    Always, wrong guess. Try again.
    So, in the 13th century, Rus’ was overrun and demolished by the Mongols. Its’ north-eastern part fell under the overlordship of the Golden Horde, a Mongol state, but they were allowed to retain their government structure with a broad autonomy, and the local leaders were dukes descendant from the old Grand Dukes of Kiev. The western parts of Rus’ were divided between Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. They, however, did not retain autonomous government structures and just became parts of the Grand Duchy or colonies of Poland. Eventually, the north-western parts overthrew the yoke of the Mongols and formed an independent Russian state. After Chmelnitskiy, imach shmo, rebelled against the Poles, his people decided to become an autonomous part of Moscow’s Russia, and Russia agreed to defend them against the Poles.

Viewing 50 posts - 201 through 250 (of 424 total)