Naysberg

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 101 through 150 (of 224 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sections in the CR #878813
    Naysberg
    Member

    This thread is in the topic you put it in, not Decaf.

    in reply to: HaRav Aaron Schechter and the Novominsker Rebbe shlita #878520
    Naysberg
    Member

    The Novominsker Rebbe shlit”a is the Rosh Agudas Yisroel. He gives direction for the everyday shailos the Agudah has as far as what to do. But as far as the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah itself, all the members are equal and none are its head.

    in reply to: The Grand Party Before the CR Goes Under #1152414
    Naysberg
    Member

    Let’s have an asifa

    in reply to: Vaad haRabbonim of America #878651
    Naysberg
    Member

    He is the self-styled Jewish Tea Party founder and a Kahanist.

    in reply to: PRENUPTUALS in FRUM circles??! #879266
    Naysberg
    Member

    rob, the gedolei poskim in Eretz Yisroel (incl. R. Elyashev) paskened the rca halachic prenup and other such prenups can cause a get meusa, and if relied upon can result in mamzeirim of her future children.

    in reply to: Dirty Tissues in Shul #985002
    Naysberg
    Member

    The shul would provide a nearby trashbin if they felt it was a problem to temporarily place it on the table.

    Sam: Because the halacha specifIcally states not to placce anything in your pocket on Shabbos.

    in reply to: Psak Halacha on Internet Access #878795
    Naysberg
    Member

    Which is, exactly, another reason why filters are incumbant upon any ehrliche yid, to block those shows online.

    in reply to: Psak Halacha on Internet Access #878792
    Naysberg
    Member

    Jbaldy, the pessimistic POV you just expressed about internet filtering was expressed many years ago when the rabbonim banned television. They said few will listen.

    And look at the (lack of) place television has today in the homes of frum, ehrlich, families.

    in reply to: PRENUPTUALS in FRUM circles??! #879264
    Naysberg
    Member

    I don’t understand. Both legal and halachic prenups are redundant. Halachas address all these issues. If a wife had money prior to marriage, she takes it with her if there is chas v’shalom a divorce. Any money earned during marriage (by either parties) belongs to the husband. And as far as a divorce coerced from penalties accrued due to a halachic prenup, it results in a get meusa in any event, thus rendering it void.

    in reply to: Dirty Tissues in Shul #984997
    Naysberg
    Member

    nycvoter: “Can you move your tissue a bit away from me, please?”

    in reply to: Dirty Tissues in Shul #984990
    Naysberg
    Member

    Sam: I think its incorrect. And you don’t really expect anyone to rely on an anon internet svara for a real, live, halachic issue.

    cherrybim: What if someone woke up with a cold Shabbos morning and is using a tissue every 10 or 15 minutes?

    in reply to: MUST READ- Real Solutions to the Internet Challenge #922541
    Naysberg
    Member

    MP: Most people who leave a loaded gun on their dining room table, their kids don’t kill themselves or a sibling with it. It is only the horror stories that you hear about. So it really is okay to leave a loaded gun on your dining room table.

    in reply to: Dirty Tissues in Shul #984986
    Naysberg
    Member

    Cherrybim:

    So please explain to us all exactly WHAT someone seated far from any trashbin, without pushing over many people in middle of davening, is to do on Shabbos after blowing his nose. If there is no eruv, pocket is assur.

    in reply to: Sephardim and Giyur #1029544
    Naysberg
    Member

    Your father is from Yemen?

    in reply to: Sephardim and Giyur #1029541
    Naysberg
    Member

    yiddishemishpacha: Can you share your details why you needed to prove your Jewishness, how you proved it and how you felt about it? It sounds very interesting.

    in reply to: Dirty Tissues in Shul #984981
    Naysberg
    Member

    The only effective remedy for this crisis is that shul’s strategically place many trashbin’s throughout the shul near all the tables. In the absence of this solution, worshippers will feel compelled to continue placing their nasal mucus on the table, for lack of any viable alternative.

    in reply to: PRENUPTUALS in FRUM circles??! #879248
    Naysberg
    Member

    The reason that many poskim ruled against this type of prenup, is because the text of the prenup purports to compel the husband to give a Get in cases where he is not halachicly obligated to do so. And it enforces this with a daily monetary penalty, another halachic problem where he is being forced against his wishes to provide the Get.

    They therefore rule that a Get provided under those circumstances results in an invalid Get, and any remarriage by his wife is adultery and future children mamzeirim.

    in reply to: Dreams #877540
    Naysberg
    Member

    It’s true that it depends on how you interpert it.

    in reply to: 1866 Mihalovich, Hungary asifa #877313
    Naysberg
    Member

    Gavra, what was it about?

    in reply to: How to use a blech on shabbos? #877527
    Naysberg
    Member

    Haifagirl: That’s absolutely incorrect.

    (Btw, you made a linguistic error in your post. You have been duly reported to the internet police.)

    in reply to: 50,000 Heroes, ????? ?? ???? #877416
    Naysberg
    Member

    .

    Naysberg
    Member

    Baruch Hashem, it is such a gevaldike pleasure to see how much filtering has been increasing in Klal Yisroel ever since the Kinus.

    in reply to: Taking on Chumros #877133
    Naysberg
    Member

    According to many poskim (other than Rav Moshe), cholov stam is completely treif. Thus, cholov yisroel isn’t a chumra, but rather basic mandatory halacha. And you can ‘t even eat pareve food that was cooked in cholov stam keilim.

    in reply to: INTERNET WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS #877286
    Naysberg
    Member

    National Review. (It is published biweekly.)

    in reply to: Enough with the yiddish already #878280
    Naysberg
    Member

    A Sefer Torah written by a kofer must be burnt. Ben-Yehuda (and his successors) is a kofer.

    in reply to: Filtered internet in public library #876719
    Naysberg
    Member

    I would do without all those bench legislation by the thugs in robes. America is a Christian country. Despite what the ACLU secular (so-called Jewish) fanatics would have you believe. It would be wise for us Jews to stop trying to impose ourselves upon the gentiles, while we are in exile.

    And the junk that today goes under the banner of “Free Speech”, much of should be illegal with an applicable jail term. Bench Thug declared “Free Speech” such as burning the American flag or posting subtle threats or lies against individuals online.

    Or the Supremely bench-legislated “constitutional right to abortion” utilizing constitutional-logic unworthy of a third grader, somehow derived under a right to “privacy”.

    So much for all your assumptions.

    in reply to: MUST READ- Real Solutions to the Internet Challenge #922502
    Naysberg
    Member

    This is very helpful. But it must be said, the Asifa was absolutely wonderful and as close to perfection as possible.

    in reply to: INTERNET WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS #877284
    Naysberg
    Member

    I mean the actual paper magazines you can subscribe to by U.S. Mail.

    in reply to: INTERNET WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS #877282
    Naysberg
    Member

    National Review

    Newsmax

    The Weekly Standard

    The American Spectator

    Rush Limbagh Newsletter

    NR is the best. The others are very good.

    in reply to: Filtered internet in public library #876716
    Naysberg
    Member

    Impeach the thugs who legislate from the bench.

    in reply to: Unfiltered Internet #876674
    Naysberg
    Member

    MP: We ARE providing a (proper) education in Klal Yisroel. Our wonderful mechanchm working hard together with parents are providing a wonderful education, based on the Torah hashkofos espoused by the gedolim shlit”a, to our tinokos sheel beis raban.

    AND IT IS WORKING!!

    Yet, we still need additional tools to complement that. One of those tools are filters.

    in reply to: Kinus Klal Yisroel: Acting Upon Our Inspiration #876371
    Naysberg
    Member

    Take what was said to heart.

    in reply to: Whitelist vs. Blacklist & Remote vs. Local Internet Filtering #876464
    Naysberg
    Member

    Having something like WebChaver (I think that’s what it’s called), or an equivelent program, that sends a report to someone else of all your web history, internet traffic and computer usage, is an essential component in addition to and on top of whatever filtering is utilized.

    in reply to: Beis Din of America #877375
    Naysberg
    Member

    It’s a MO BD.

    in reply to: who will speak at the Siyum Hashas? #876417
    Naysberg
    Member

    Every Siyum Hashas, from the inception of the Daf Yomi through the siyum 7 1/2 years ago, has always had prominent Yiddish speaking. There’s no reason for that to change and it should be expected from anyone attending.

    in reply to: Filtered internet in public library #876711
    Naysberg
    Member

    The Supreme Court forced the libraries to offer unfiltered. Congress passed a law requiring filtering. But the thugs in robes, who legislate from the bench, overturned it.

    in reply to: Black hat #877104
    Naysberg
    Member

    A head-covering was ALWAYS part of Jewish uniform for a ben Torah. Throughout our history.

    in reply to: Enough with the yiddish already #878268
    Naysberg
    Member

    Sam, what the apikorus Ben-Yehuda put into Ivrit, is a very far cry from any natural growth.

    in reply to: Enough with the yiddish already #878265
    Naysberg
    Member

    Nechomah, Thank you for that accurate definition about Ivrit.

    in reply to: Unfiltered Internet #876629
    Naysberg
    Member

    Some people ended up being Conservative when the no driving to shul on Shabbos was enforced.

    in reply to: property lines – who in the city can solve issues #876022
    Naysberg
    Member

    Counterclaim? They have no claim. They put boards on their neighbors property. The neighbor removed it from her own property. The builder has no leg to stand on in court. What are they going to possibly claim? That they wish to seize their neighbors property?

    in reply to: Agudas HaRabonim and Iggud HaRabonim #875363
    Naysberg
    Member

    The Agudas HaRabbonim was established in 1901. The Igud HaRabbonim in 1942.

    in reply to: property lines – who in the city can solve issues #876019
    Naysberg
    Member

    Except that the builders already engaged in self-help by putting it up, with no rights. By her taking it down, from her own property, she is doing no more than the other side — except she has rights.

    in reply to: Agudas HaRabonim and Iggud HaRabonim #875360
    Naysberg
    Member

    They still have a beis din. I’m not sure how active they are.

    in reply to: Googling Your Date #1075026
    Naysberg
    Member

    On what grounds would anyone object to being googled? And facebook is only what someone themselves posted to it.

    in reply to: Unfiltered Internet #876579
    Naysberg
    Member

    How can a cellphone, that is not a smartphone, that uses a java browser like Opera Mini be filtered? As far as I know it can’t be done.

    in reply to: New Asifa Location – Arthur Ashe Stadium #875383
    Naysberg
    Member

    Itche, They only sold tickets with an actual seat assignment. Anything else was sold at the other venue (also with a specific assignment.) Nothing was oversold.

    in reply to: property lines – who in the city can solve issues #876015
    Naysberg
    Member

    The OP said its a Jewish owner. So civil court is forbidden due to arkayos.

    in reply to: Agudas HaRabonim and Iggud HaRabonim #875359
    Naysberg
    Member

    AHR was led by Rav Moshe. But today it is a shell of its days of glory. Same with IHR, which is a newer rabbinical alliance that originally catered to the younger rabbonim. Similar to the MO’s RCA. Today Agudas Yisroel and its Moetzes essentially assumes the function of what Agudas HaRabbonim once did.

    in reply to: Over 70% of Orthodox Jews are Chareidim #1098095
    Naysberg
    Member

    Wow, my numbers need revising. They’ve rented another arena and now sold out 65,000 seats for a men-only gathering! Double that if women could’ve come. Add 25% for the children under 19 who aren’t being given tickets and the elderly and infirm. Figure if even 2/3 of Chareidim in the metro area are attending the Asifa (its probably less than 2/3), then you need to add an additional 50% to the numbers for those who chose to skip it or couldn’t come. (50% is the missing third.) Count all the Chareidim from other cities and countries.

Viewing 50 posts - 101 through 150 (of 224 total)