ujm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,801 through 1,850 (of 5,117 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: SHIDUCHIM. #2146731
    ujm
    Participant

    That old canard again?

    in reply to: Chasidus Without Context #2146722
    ujm
    Participant

    Chabad is “Heimish”?

    in reply to: Chasidus Without Context #2146707
    ujm
    Participant

    YO (Ye): You’re still counting based on the years of Yushke?

    in reply to: SHIDUCHIM. #2146686
    ujm
    Participant

    Well said.

    Yasher Koach

    in reply to: LOOKING FOR A SHIUR #2146685
    ujm
    Participant

    HaGaon HaRav Ephraim Wachsman shlita and HaGaon HaRav Avrohom Schorr shlita are about the same temperament and hashkafa?

    in reply to: Changing the Shidduch System #2146684
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: Chazal give the story of Yochanon Kohen Godol as THE example EVERYONE needs to learn from. Namely, say Chazal, to NEVER think you’re “fortified” and safe, as you constantly pontificate.

    in reply to: Changing the Shidduch System #2146625
    ujm
    Participant

    “By this time, B’H the young person had about 15 years of Jewish schooling. Should we expect that they are able to fortify themselves by this time (I presume parents, friends and community did not abandon them)?”

    Extremely foolish comment for multiple reasons. To take one, Yochanon Kohen Godol was the tzadik and Kohen Godol for 80 years when he became an apikorus tzeduki.

    But he was fortified, you say!

    in reply to: Changing the Shidduch System #2146580
    ujm
    Participant

    He doesn’t have to ask a woman. There are more appropriate and effective ways to accomplish the goal better, more efficiently and, most importantly, more Halachicly appropriately.

    in reply to: Changing the Shidduch System #2146483
    ujm
    Participant

    The fewer divorces among the chasidim may be due to their having traditional marriages the way it was done throughout Jewish history, without them updating to an American romantic fairytale “marriage”.

    Shimon hates Yiddishkeit. He doesn’t have a right to express his opinion here on Jewish topics.

    in reply to: Onaas Devarim #2146402
    ujm
    Participant

    Thank you for sharing your boich svara.

    in reply to: Gmail spell check #2146201
    ujm
    Participant

    I see that Rabbeinu Ha”Gadol” has already given the correct teretz.

    Future doros will learn from these teshvos.

    in reply to: Gmail spell check #2146196
    ujm
    Participant

    Google remember your previous manually typed words. When you type something similar in the future, it’ll suggest your custom database of words, even if it isn’t an official English word.

    in reply to: Georgia isn’t Really Solid Red #2145993
    ujm
    Participant

    Florida is no longer purple or a swing state. Florida has moved decisively to the right and is now solidly red.

    in reply to: Anti-semitism: Republicans vs Democrats #2145749
    ujm
    Participant

    Of all people in the world, Donald Trump is thale least antisemitic of all. Donald Trump is a proven, lifetime (i.e. reputationally and actionably long before he entered politics through his presidency), Oheiv Yisroel. Klal Yisroel has few friends from Umos Haolam as good as Donald Trump.

    in reply to: Anti-semitism: Republicans vs Democrats #2145652
    ujm
    Participant

    This is a farcial meaningless so-called “poll” that was designed to produce the Democrat desired results.

    The Democrats have been the party tolerating, accepting, welcoming and honoring antisemites, especially black antisemites, for many many decades. Whereas the Republicans have institutionally rejected antisemites.

    in reply to: Mekubal/Tzaddik #2145584
    ujm
    Participant

    YeshivaGuy45:

    Ruach Hakodesh certainly exists today.

    in reply to: Mekubal/Tzaddik #2145580
    ujm
    Participant

    This is Avira’s response to the OP (from the other thread with the OP’s duplicate post):

    Chaimish – Rav Gamliel Rabinowitz is known as a true mekubal and is accepted by the litvishe and chasidishe community.

    in reply to: Mekubal/Tzaddik #2145442
    ujm
    Participant

    Yes.

    in reply to: Taking a Kulah from Across the Aisle #2145284
    ujm
    Participant

    Then there are the folks who are smart enough to know which rabbi to ask which questions in the first place. They know Rabbis A, B and C don’t allow what they want to do. But Rabbi D is known to allow it. So after they did their rabbinical research they first ask Rabbi D. When the next question comes up that their research told them Rabbi D doesn’t allow, they find out that Rabbi X allows it. So, obviously, Rabbi X is their first phone call for that question.

    This way no one could ever accuse them of Heter-Shopping, since they never asked a second rabbi for a different answer after not liking what the first one pakened.

    That’s why it’s good to have friends to ask which rabbi to call for what questions.

    Of course there are some rabbis who just let about anything. They can be relied upon for any question.

    in reply to: Taking a Kulah from Across the Aisle #2145129
    ujm
    Participant

    “Once a Rav assers you cannot ask another Rav for a heter”

    Once a Rav matirs, can you ask another Rav for an issur?

    in reply to: Convention #2145049
    ujm
    Participant

    Disabled Yidden also struggle with be given a sense of belonging. So do mentally ill Yidden. Unmarried Yidden aren’t allowed to daven for the Amud on the Yomin Noraim and have other Halachic restrictions. The fix for the unmarried is to find them shidduchim. The fix for the other aforementioned Yidden with this issue are more difficult to help.

    in reply to: Convention #2144901
    ujm
    Participant

    ubiq: What would be YOUR answer/solution to that unanswered question you quoted?

    in reply to: Important Advice for Jews #2144709
    ujm
    Participant

    I have my Israeli passport always ready in case Iran is about to attack and I need to fly out of Tel Aviv ASAP.

    in reply to: latest shidduch data #2144584
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb CTL,

    Do you anticipate that at some future point you’d want a shidduch? What general age range would you consider, and why wouldn’t you consider below the lower end of your range?

    in reply to: latest shidduch data #2144549
    ujm
    Participant

    Are Roster:

    Only the first two per Yeshiva get a monetary prize? That’ll be enough? Afterwards the rush might peter out.

    And every small Yeshiva and large Yeshiva will get the same two?

    in reply to: latest shidduch data #2144506
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb CTL,

    On the somewhere brighter side, you’re making Are Roster (see comment above) happy by alleviating his #1 takeaway from the study; namely that single girls who marry divorced/widower men take away shidduchim from divorced girls.

    That vital point made,

    edited

    in reply to: Jewish Israel #2144438
    ujm
    Participant

    You think Beis Din didn’t prosecute murderers if they technically couldn’t issue a death penalty verdict?

    in reply to: latest shidduch data #2144323
    ujm
    Participant

    Are Roster & Meir G:

    Please share a very detailed explanation of what YOUR SOLUTION to this problem is.

    Thank you

    in reply to: Hated Nation #2144321
    ujm
    Participant

    rightwriter: Your OP is absolutely correct. You have my full vote on this issue.

    in reply to: Jewish Israel #2144101
    ujm
    Participant

    The Halacha is very clear and explicit. If someone isn’t frum, Beis Din is obligated to beat him senseless, if necessary, until he becomes frum.

    in reply to: latest shidduch data #2144074
    ujm
    Participant

    Meir, you can’t mix/compare Litvish and Chasidish.

    in reply to: Jewish Israel #2143977
    ujm
    Participant

    YO (Ye?), Name which “many rabbonim and tzadikim” you’re referring to, big shot. We both know that you won’t be able to name even one mainstream rabbi, since it is non-existent, let alone “many rabbonim and tzadikim”.

    in reply to: Jewish Israel #2143837
    ujm
    Participant

    “I mean of course you cant force people to become frum”

    Yes you can force people to become frum. Indeed, we’re obligated to force people to become frum.

    Perhaps what you meant to write is that since the Goyim and the Frei control the governments and make the laws they use those tools to stop us from forcing people to become frum, as we’re required to do. But, certainly, under proper circumstances we can and should force people to become frum.

    in reply to: Should all Yidden know Hebrew? #2142906
    ujm
    Participant

    Of course they should know Loshon Kodesh (not Ivrit.). But they should not speak Loshon Kodesh (and certainly not Ivrit.)

    in reply to: Is a Kashrus Agency the Moral Police? #2142904
    ujm
    Participant

    Shlomo: The Marriott, the Sheraton and the Hyatt are also frequented by the frum oilem including many choshuv Rabbonim. That doesn’t mean any of them could or should get a hechsher.

    in reply to: More Jokes,Humor, and Funny lines #2142757
    ujm
    Participant

    MOISHE PLOTNICK’S CHINESE LAUNDRY

    Walking through San Francisco’s Chinatown, a tourist from the Midwest was fascinated with all the Chinese restaurants, shops, signs and banners. He turned a corner and saw a building with the sign “Moishe Plotnik’s Chinese Laundry.”

    “Moishe Plotnik?” he wondered. “How does that fit in Chinatown?”

    So he walked into the shop and saw a fairly standard looking Chinese laundry. He could see that the proprietors were clearly aware of the uniqueness of the name as there were baseball hats, T-shirts and coffee mugs emblazoned with the logo “Moishe Plotnik’s Chinese Laundry.” There was also a fair selection of Chinatown souvenirs, indicating that the name alone had brought many tourists into the shop.

    The tourist selected a coffee cup as a conversation piece to take back to his office. Behind the counter was a smiling old Chinese gentleman who thanked him for his purchase. The tourist asked, “Can you tell me how this place got a name like “Moishe Plotnik’s Chinese Laundry?” The old man answered, “Ahh… Everybody asks me that. It’s the name of the owner.”

    Looking around, the tourist asked, “Is he here now?” “He is right here,” replied the old man.
    “He is me.”

    “Really? You’re Chinese. How did you ever get a name like Moishe Plotnik?”

    “Is simple,” said the old man. “Many, many years ago when I came to this country, I was standing in line at the documentation center. The man in front of me was a Jewish gentleman from Poland.
    The lady at the counter looked at him and said, “What is your name?” He said, ” Moishe Plotnik.”

    Then she looked at me and said, “What is your name?” I said, “Sam Ting.”

    in reply to: Is a Kashrus Agency the Moral Police? #2142743
    ujm
    Participant

    YO: Are you still an adherent of Avi Weiss’ OO?

    in reply to: Who You Enable by Voting Democrat #2142691
    ujm
    Participant

    “Whose life would have been saved had the Warsaw Ghetto uprising not happened?”

    Potentially any life lost when the Nazis razed the ghetto, and whoever was in it, to the ground.

    America was winning in Vietnam. But Americans got tired of losing American servicemen.

    in reply to: Who You Enable by Voting Democrat #2142537
    ujm
    Participant

    The Warsaw Ghetto uprising was foolhardy from the start, never had a chance and caused needless Jewish deaths as a result.

    in reply to: Who You Enable by Voting Democrat #2142455
    ujm
    Participant

    The Nazis did what they did despite the “partisans” making armed resistance. The Nazis killed 10 in revenge for every one of theirs killed by a partisan.

    in reply to: Does Hashem Want Us to Survive? #2142454
    ujm
    Participant

    We don’t even reach the ankles of our Elter Zeidas and Bubbes in Yiddishkeit.

    in reply to: Who You Enable by Voting Democrat #2142403
    ujm
    Participant

    uno: Don’t be a fool. If Jews were armed in Europe, they couldn’t outshoot the Nazis.

    in reply to: Who You Enable by Voting Democrat #2142197
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer, so you believe government programs/hand outs should be time limited for use only as a temporary springboard period?

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2142179
    ujm
    Participant

    Yay.

    in reply to: Who You Enable by Voting Democrat #2141963
    ujm
    Participant

    Yseribus: “Headlines” are your Toras Moshe MiSinai? The New York Times is your bible? You believe everything you read? All the headlines and media articles start with a presumption of being misleading, biased and very possibly outright untruthful.

    Now you are arguing who wants to give *more* welfare money versus who thinks a lesser dollar figure is the appropriate amount of welfare. That is a completely different question than your previous false assertion that one party ever proposed to completely eliminate welfare, food stamps, Medicaid or Medicare. If Republicans want to fund, let’s hypothetically say, $500 billion a year for welfare whereas Democrats want to fund it with $600 billion, that doesn’t make Democrats better. Otherwise, if someone else proposes to fund it for $700 billion, suddenly the Democrats are the bad guys.

    in reply to: Who You Enable by Voting Democrat #2141875
    ujm
    Participant

    Yseribus: What you are writing is a complete falsehood. Republicans voted to fund Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, WIC, etc.

    in reply to: Who You Enable by Voting Democrat #2141835
    ujm
    Participant

    alanschwartz: Why would you encourage anyone to stop reading the Torah from a Godol HaDor? Would you rather he read the propaganda and falsehoods you find every day in the New York Times?

    in reply to: Who You Enable by Voting Democrat #2141825
    ujm
    Participant

    Yseribus: That’s a complete fabrication and falsehood. Republicans have consistently voted in favor of funding welfare.

    in reply to: Who is a bigger threat in America #2141768
    ujm
    Participant

    moishele: The discussion here is about threats to Jews; not to democracy. In any event, the thousands of Far-Left Antifa terrorists and BLM anarchists burning cities and killing police officers and civilians across the US over many months where and are a far greater threat than the 150 rioters in DC one day in one place a year and a half ago.

    in reply to: Who is a bigger threat in America #2141686
    ujm
    Participant

    The mainstream left accepts and honors their antisemites, such as those in the black community (Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and numerous other fully accepted black Democrats) whereas the mainstream right rejects their antisemites. Furthermore, antisemitism is very large on the left whereas it is the fringe on the right. Additionally, the violence from the left, just look at all the reports in major cities of black violence against Jews in NY, NJ, etc., far far outnumbers the rare violence from the right against Jews.

Viewing 50 posts - 1,801 through 1,850 (of 5,117 total)