WolfishMusings

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 6,451 through 6,500 (of 7,792 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bilaam #688104
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    he looked at Moshe Rabeinund said he has traits of bad people like anger, so they asked him whats pshat, and he said he worked on himself. bilaam didnt but he was still zoche to nevuah

    But again, that reflects a personal failing on Bilaam’s part, not a collective failing on the part of the nations. Their claim would still be valid.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Bilaam #688100
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Perhaps the defense is:

    Moshe and Bilaam were prophets who reflected the people whom they came from. You were given a prophet who reflected the people to whom he was given to exactly the same extent that Moshe reflected the people to whom he was given.

    If that’s the case, however, then there’s no need for the defense. The point was that if HKBH gave a non-Jew such powers, then there would be the chance that they might accept the Torah. However, if the prophet is merely a reflection of the people, then why would they be able to make the argument of “if we only had…?”

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Bilaam #688098
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    billaam had great potential to be good yet he used it all in a negative way

    That’s fine, but then that reflects a personal failing on the part of Bilaam — not a collective failing on the part of the nations.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Bilaam #688094
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    GAW,

    I’m not asking why Bilaam existed. I’m asking about how the choice of Bilaam serves as a refutation to a potential defense.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Bilaam #688092
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    “HKBH gave prophetic powers to Moshe.”

    That’s what I get for putting this together in a rush. It should have read “HKBH gave prophetic powers to Bilaam.”

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Yeshivish uniform #1056083
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Nothing

    It just wasn’t approved yet

    Fair enough. When you see post 2 being deleted before post 1 has gone up — and you see other posts go up after it, the tendency is to think that post 1 is also going to be rejected.

    The Wolf

    Understandable, the moderating system can get a little off kilter sometimes.

    in reply to: Yeshivish uniform #1056081
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    OK, and what’s so offensive about my other post that it hasn’t gone up?

    The Wolf

    Nothing

    It just wasn’t approved yet

    in reply to: Yeshivish uniform #1056079
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    DELETED

    in reply to: Yeshivish uniform #1056077
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    At the root of Yirah, it means to “see” Hashem. When you come to “see” Hashem you will be both in awe and in fear.

    I’m not so certain of that. The two words have completely different shorashim. Yes, they sounds similar in certain tenses, but they are not the same word.

    Aside, if you’re a ba’al kriah, you must be careful to differentiate between yiru (they saw — pronounced with a sh’va nach) and yir’u (they feared – pronounced with a sh’va na).

    The former can be found in Ki Sisa (24:10 — note only one yud in the word VaYiru)

    ??????????, ??? ??????? ??????????; ??????? ????????, ??????????? ??????? ??????????, ????????? ???????????, ???????

    The latter can be found right before Az Yashir (note the two yuds in the word VaYir’u):

    ???????? ?????????? ???-?????? ??????????, ?????? ?????? ?????? ????????????, ??????????? ?????, ???-??????; ?????????????, ????????, ??????????, ????????.

    Reading the word the wrong way changes the meaning and the ba’al kriah is required to go back and read it again correctly.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Making Stuff Up and Sources #687962
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Okay, perhaps not the full 11 months if that’s the only sin.

    And, again, I state that you must be an incredible person to know with such certainty if I combine this “sin” with another that I will get the full 11 months.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Yeshivish uniform #1056072
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Perhaps I’m looking at it the wrong way, but I’ve always understood Yirah (in terms of Kibud Av V’aym) to be more along the lines of “awe” than “fear.”

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Board Games #808971
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Oh, and FWIW, the game of Wealth of Nations ended up being only between myself and two sons. Instead of focusing on farms and banks as I did in the previous game, I decided to corner the labor market. It might have worked too, had I not made several stupid miscalculations during the course of the game. In the end, I lost badly to the boys. Oh well… there’s always next time.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Board Games #808970
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Sorry, Moshe. I take an very active role in the lives of my nephews and nieces.

    If your interpretation of the Torah says that that’s wrong, then you boycott your nieces. I’ll stick with my family, thank you very much.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Why Are There So Many Angry people Out There? #687375
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Like almost any other Middah, anger has it’s place when it’s properly used. However, I can’t recall a single time in my lifetime and personal experience when anger by me was justified.*

    The Wolf

    * That’s not to say I’ve never become angry — just that in my personal life I’ve yet to find a time when my anger was truly justified.

    in reply to: 5 Most Important Shidduch Questions #687678
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    But I’d love to know how you could make meatballs look green. Spagetti is easy, but red meat? Tell me, please.

    Now that I think about it, I’m not sure how I’d do it. Perhaps I overspoke earlier. My apologies.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Making Stuff Up and Sources #687959
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    This is no chumra and geder. This is an aveira mamish straight out of Shulchan Aruch

    Actually, it’s NOT in the Shulchan Aruch. It’s in the Rema on Shulchan Aruch — and there, as I pointed out, it’s mentioned in an off-hand manner in an off-topic discussion and presented as a “yesh omrim” — in other words, not a universal opinion.

    and the Kitzur S”A

    Ah, but halacha does not always follow the Kitzur.

    that will earn a person a free 11 month stay in a well heated area after 120.

    Wow! You claim to know that for the sin of holding my wife’s hand in public that I will not only go to hell, but get the full 11 month treatment! You must be a real Navi with the ability to sense what’s going on Machorai HaPargud.

    (Sorry, I couldn’t resist.)

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Some People Be Considered "Unmarriable"? #687268
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Whats a casual paradox?

    It’s where cause and effect get caught in a never ending circle.

    If you believe that genetic diseases didn’t exist in the Jewish community before Dor Yeshorim, then why was DY formed in the first place? This causes a loop where you believe that DY led to disease which led to DY which led to disease which led to DY…

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Making Stuff Up and Sources #687958
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Oh well, I guess that’s another circle of Hell lower for me. I didn’t hold my wife’s hand as we left the chuppah.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: When are you leaving to upstate? #687733
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Wolfish, may you be zocha to reach that madreiga b’korov.

    What if I see a different path in Avodas HaShem for myself? Is Lakewood the *only* way to go?

    The Wolf

    in reply to: When are you leaving to upstate? #687731
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    FWIW, my kids used to go to Mogen Av/Sternberg (when I sent them to camp that is. Now it’s just too expensive).

    The Wolf

    in reply to: When are you leaving to upstate? #687730
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    I thought all the CR members were Lakewood material!

    Hi! Allow me to introduce myself — my name is Wolf – and I am not Lakewood material. 🙂

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Why Are There So Many Angry people Out There? #687343
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Who’s angry?

    The Wolf

    What is The Wolf angry about?

    Heh. LOL.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Yavo Song – Terrible Mistake #794576
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    WellInformedYid,

    I think what you meant to say was “thank you for the information.” 🙂

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Why Are There So Many Angry people Out There? #687341
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Who’s angry?

    The Wolf

    in reply to: When are you leaving to upstate? #687724
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    I’m just curious as to where the YW chev goes…

    I don’t go to camp. I work. 🙂

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Some People Be Considered "Unmarriable"? #687252
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    How many of them had children born with Tay-Sachs and other genetic diseases?

    No doubt at least some of those couples DID have children with Tay-Sachs and other genetic diseases.

    Being a physician, I don’t think you mean to say that Tay-Sachs and other genetic diseases were unheard of in the Jewish community before Dor Yeshorim.

    (Aside from being ridiculous, it’s also a causal paradox.)

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Some People Be Considered "Unmarriable"? #687250
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    how did our grandparents or even parents all get married and have kids without Dor Yeshorim? how come theyre fine?

    You’re forgetting that a certain percentage of them no doubt DID have kids with Tay Sachs and other such diseases. Such kids probably died very young and are just not remembered today.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: The Stigma On Therapy Etc. #690408
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    If a person is not a carrier for a particular disease, the status of that persons’ spouse is irrelevant, so there is no need to inform her.

    I’m not necessarily advocating for (or against) telling. I’m just curious as to the classification of such material as Loshon HaRa.

    There are many things that one should not say, but not all of them are Lashon HaRa. Sometimes (as it might be in this case) it’s better to be quiet without it falling under the rubric of LhR.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: When are you leaving to upstate? #687721
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    and btw, in the camp i go to, its unheard of to play ball on shabbos

    So, you can personally vouch for *every* camper, staff member and visitor to your camp on Shabbos that they won’t do *anything* that might be considered improper on Shabbos? I don’t think you (or anyone else, for that matter) can provide such a guarantee.

    I think you shouldn’t take the chance. Shabbos is Shabbos and it is unadvisable to play with shabbos.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: When are you leaving to upstate? #687718
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    HIE,

    You’re missing the point. I’m not talking about Flatbush or Boro Park or Rav Belsky.

    You said that an eruv — if otherwise valid — is made pasul by people misusing it (by playing ball). I’m just reminding you of that so that you don’t use the eruv in camp (for the reasons I stated above).

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Making Stuff Up and Sources #687936
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Wolf – holding hands with a down syndrome kid is VERY different.

    Oh, I agree. I was simply responding to Kasha’s point which was (bolding mine):

    You only hold hands for affectionate reasons.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Some People Be Considered "Unmarriable"? #687248
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    While Aisov may not have been a known wife-beater, he was a murderer and an aduterer (is that a word?)

    I’m not necessarily disputing that point. But the point was made that protecting your daughter from a wife-beater is bad because of what happened to Yaakov and Dina. My point was meant to show that Yaakov was not necessarily punished for keeping Dina from a wife-beater since we don’t know that Eisav was one.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: When are you leaving to upstate? #687714
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    an eruv in a reshus harabim dairaisa is ok

    Yes, I know. But you said that an eruv, even if otherwise valid, is passul if people misuse it (by playing ball, for example).

    That being said, I just want to remind you not to use the eruv in your camp since you don’t know if people might misuse it and make it passul (according to you).

    The Wolf

    in reply to: When are you leaving to upstate? #687709
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    an eruv in a reshus hayachid is ok.

    Right. No one argued against that.

    You, however, said that a perfectly valid eruv becomes pasul if it is misused. The context was in boys playing ball within the eruv.

    You said:

    I have seen people playing ball in the street and i’m not evening talking about the fact that your not suppose to play ball on shabbos but….

    My response to that was (bolding mine):

    If there’s a problem with playing ball on Shabbos, then educate people on that aspect of it — don’t conflate it with carrying.

    In any event, I agree with you that there are people who might abuse the rules regarding carrying on Shabbos with an eruv — but that doesn’t detract from the validity of the eruv itself. If it’s valid, then it’s valid regardless of the fact that some people may choose to abuse it.

    Your response was:

    no wolf, that invalidates it.

    IOW, you held (and gave a source from some sefer that no one ever heard of) that if someone misuses and eruv, that makes it pasul.

    So, I’m advising you that since you don’t know for sure if anyone in the camp is misusing the eruv (and making it pasul according to your position) that you should not use the eruv. After all, chillul Shabbos is a serious matter. As you said:

    Shabbos is Shabbos, and it is unadvisable to play with shabbos

    The Wolf

    (Source thread: http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/eruv-in-brooklyn/page/2)

    in reply to: Making Stuff Up and Sources #687931
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Wolf: WADR I do not believe you even believe the excuses you are trying to give to do what you know albeit deny is an extremely large aveira.

    WADR, that does not respond to what I actually said.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Should Some People Be Considered "Unmarriable"? #687243
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    While Yaakov Avinu agreed with you and hid Dina in a box to protect her from his brother Eisav so that he would not marry her;

    While Eisav may have had any number of bad traits, I have yet to see a source that states that he beat his wives. Do you know of one?

    The Wolf

    in reply to: 5 Most Important Shidduch Questions #687667
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    The easiest food to cook for such an extended time was chulent. Hence the minhag.

    Is a minhag a practice that is taken on for religious reasons with religious significance, or is any regular practice that comes about as a result of circumstance a minhag?

    Having hot foods is the former. Having chulent is the latter.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Feminism #1162766
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    I’m sure we don’t disagree in practice as in a healthy marriage a man is the authority, a woman is submissive and sometimes there need to be compromises.

    Again, I don’t see why you say it has to be that way. If it works for your marriage — great. But not every marriage is that way.

    In my marriage, no one is the “ultimate authority,” and it works *very* well for us. In other marriages I know, the wife is more assertive and the husband is more laid-back (my grandparents were like that) and it works for them.

    IOW, you can’t make the blanket statement that the man has to be the authority and the wife submissive for it to be a healthy marriage. Every marriage is different and one model does not work for all couples.

    The Wolf

    The Wolf

    in reply to: The Stigma On Therapy Etc. #690405
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    was told that it is Loshon Hora about his family to disclose it to anyone,

    Interesting. Is it also Lashon Hara to say that someone is blind? I’m not certain how this is fundamentally different.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Making Stuff Up and Sources #687928
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Kasha,

    Based on your standard, I couldn’t even talk to my wife in public, since we use terms of endearment (dear, for example) when we talk.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Making Stuff Up and Sources #687927
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Checking for lice is more of a medical thing. You wouldn’t be upset if a male doctor checked your wife’s hair if he was the only one available to do it.

    Back in the times of the Rema, doctors didn’t check you for lice. A spouse would be the likely candidate to do so — by closely inspecting the hair. It’s along the same principles as actually giving a bath to someone — there are medical/theraputic properties to it, but it’s usually done between people who are close to each other.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Making Stuff Up and Sources #687926
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    The Kitzur is giving an example, not the only example and not the minimum example. No one holds someones hand in public for non-affectionate reasons.

    There is a boy in my shul with Down’s Syndrome. He’s 12 years old. For some reason that I can’t fathom, he’s taken a liking to me. He always requests to hold my hand in the street — and I let him. And I can guarantee you — no one thinks that it’s because it’s an act of chibah.

    It is clearly assur and a very serious aveira.

    It’s obviously not so clear if the Mechaber of the SA didn’t mention it and the Rema only mentioned it off-topically (in a chapter that wasn’t even discussing spousal relationships at all) in an offhand manner as a “yesh omrim.”

    The Wolf

    in reply to: BP Oil Spill & Moshiach #687442
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    I make it a point to NOT get excited about any “sign” or “prediction” about when Moshiach will come. Far too many people either misinterpret sources, just plain make things up (yes, I have examples) or are just plain wrong when it comes to predicting that Moshiach is close because event X happened.

    I wait and daven for Moshiach’s arrival every day. When he gets here, he gets here.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: 5 Most Important Shidduch Questions #687665
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Can you make them green?

    Can I? Yes.

    Will I? No — no one will eat them.

    I once made the mistake of trying to give Eeees green eggs before we were married. I guess I’m lucky she married me anyway. 🙂

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Making Stuff Up and Sources #687923
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Source: Kitzur Shulchan Aruch, siman kuf nun beis, sif yud alef. I will leave it up to you to interpret “devarim shel chiba” and if holding hands falls into this category.

    Thank you for the source. I find R. Ganzfried’s choice of words very interesting. He says as follows:

    ??? ???? ???? ?? ???? ?????? ?? ???, ???? ???? ????? ?????? ???? ?????, ??? ???? ????? ???? ?????

    (My translation: One is not allowed to engage with his wife acts of chibah [purposely left untranslated] such as inspecting her head and the like in front of others lest it cause a viewer to think impure thoughts.)

    You’ll note that the example of a typical “act of chibah” is inspecting the head. We in the 58th/21st century might be wondering what the heck he’s talking about.

    The example that he gives (examining the head) actually comes right from the Rema in Even HaEzer 21:5. There, in a chapter that doesn’t even really relate to spousal relationships at all, tacks on a coda at the end of a ruling that states:

    and some say that one may not engage with one’s wife in acts of chibah such as inspecting the head to check for lice in front of others.”

    There are two significant points to make about this Rema.

    Firstly, it’s clearly NOT a universal opinion.

    Secondly, the example he gives is an act that is very intimate — going through a spouses hair. That is, IMHO, far more intimate than holding hands — and I believe the Rema is setting the bar fairly high in what is considered an “act of chibah.”

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Broken Engagements #919543
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    And I agree with you! But nowadays, people are more spoiled than previous generations. If you want to say because most people in previous generations were poor -that’s fine.

    That basically amounts to saying that a higher standard of living = spoiled. I hardly think that’s the case.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: 5 Most Important Shidduch Questions #687662
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Yur rebbe was right and yur wrong. Meatballs and spageti is not a shabbas meal! Its a regular weekday meal. At night you should have chicken and during the seuda at day you should have chulent. Those are the main shabbas meals. Yes you can have some other things but not meatballs and spigeti!

    Heh. Just for you, Moshe, I’ll have meatballs and spaghetti on Shabbos as often as possible. 🙂

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Broken Engagements #919540
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    You also can’t compare this generation to your grandmother’s regarding electronic devices; THERe WERE NONE back then!!!!!!

    That’s right. If you look earlier in the thread, you’ll see that I made that very same point.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Making Stuff Up and Sources #687918
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Since you are darshining from the Torah, what about Sarah hiding from guests when Avrohom brought them to his home? Does your wife hide from your guests? Do you kiss your wife in public?

    That’s actually a midrash, not an open pasuk. Not quite the same.

    The Wolf

    in reply to: Making Stuff Up and Sources #687915
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    BTW, for the record, in the picture in question, we are not touching.

    The Wolf

Viewing 50 posts - 6,451 through 6,500 (of 7,792 total)