Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Also true, in fact it could theoretically be interfering with WALK in its broadcast area, even if WALK’s signal doesn’t reach all areas which Jroot’s does.
I just don’t think people should be throwing around accusations without knowledge, and even with knowledge, unless toeles halachically justifies it.
True.
Popa, do some research before chastising others.
Charlie, he was kidding.
No pigs’ milk or pigs’ milk product is sold in any Dunkin Donuts in the United States.
That’s what they claim.
(I was also kidding about that part).
Charlie, did you measure the signal? If not, then you really don’t know that it’s cutting into their signal, do you.
You weren’t the anonymous poster(s) I was referring to.
(I am listening to an acapella version of Yaaleh V’yavo as I post. I think it’s from Miami Boys’ Choir.) (Now someone’s singing Carlebach’s Hinei Kel.)
Operating a station without a license is Genevah.
It’s illegal, and I am not trying to advocate for it, but you throw around terminology very carelessly. Suddenly, you’re a big machmir.
You might say it doesnt infere with WALK, but that is not your decision, its the FCC decision.
No, ZD, the FCC doesn’t decide which radio waves interfere with others. They didn’t make up the laws of physics.
Apushatayid, I was asking regarding Charlie’s false (according to two anonymous posters on ywn) claim that Jroot’s signal interfered with WALK’s.
As to which is worse, operating a radio station w/o a license, or publicly berating Jroot, why don’t you ask your rov.
everyone holds it’s next Tuesday except for R’ Schachter who holds it’s next Monday
And the Chazon Ish who holds that it isn’t.
If you mean the wheat from 10 years ago, then yes, obviously it is no longer chodosh.
For at least nine years already. This past year’s grain just became muttar (e.g. Dunkin’ Donuts, although the pigs’ milk remains assur).
But if you mean the wheat that is now being harvested and is chodosh, I’m having a hard time following.
If it took root before the day of the hakravas haomer, it becomes muttar even if harvested later.
The cutoff dates on certain products are actually before Succos.
But you wouldn’t expect halachic precision from someone who eats Dunkin’ Donuts anyhow.
Writersoul, that’s not good at all. (your math)
I only say mashiv haruach umorid hageshem for half the year.
I don’t know to whom you refer, but I wouldn’t accept an anonymously quoted psak from anyone, including R’ Wosner.
If that’s the case, he’s obviously assuming that anyone who has ever had any type of eating disorder is in danger of a relapse from fasting. Sounds like a bit of a stretch, especially since not all eating disorders are the same.
As always, ask a competent posek, and don’t rely on info from anonymous internet sources, even when quoting known poskim.
(I also found this:
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/matzos-from-years-past)
I also did a search.
Maybe it’s to show that matza is muttar after Pesach, like the story in popa’s haggadah.
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/questions-about-gebrokts#post-452316
I think it’s to be mekayem “b’chol door va’door chayav adam liros es atzmo k’ilu yatza miMitzrayim”.
Jroot listeners, when Jroot is off, do you hear this L.I. station?
I have a feeling this is a troll thread
Nah, popa would never make a troll thread.
Apparently, the FCC is monitoring the coffee room for updates on the status of Jroot.
Every time someone posts that it’s on, they shut them down.
If they were good enough, why wouldn’t I use it during the week?
Talking in shul during davening is assur. Whether these stories about avoiding/curing cancer are true or not, obviously I don’t know, but I wouldn’t be surprised. What would it hurt to take on something that might/could/will help? We should all be trying to better ourselves.
This is worth repeating.
There’s a lot in between ignorant and in your face.
ZD, how to define a tinok shenishbah is a halachic issue. Did you go through the sugya or ask a shailah, or did you make that up?
LF, don’t let any of your daughters go out with someone who doesn’t even know how to count.
Agree with Goq.
Nfgo3, the two are not mutually exclusive.
We should stop talking during davening, and iy”H in that zechus, a cure will be found.
The nimshal is to someone who does need glasses.
I miss feivel/80.
Rebyidd, my stomach is also part of my body.
My point (and I’m glad if you found the way I expressed it humorous) is that medical insurance is not supposed to cover anything related to human health. Many plans don’t cover dental and vision, and unless they mislead you, there’s really no tayna against the insurance company.
My health insurance said I do not need to eat. They of course didn’t say those exact words but they said that they won’t pay my grocery bill.
here mishpacha wrote a article against lev tahor , so he wrote a article pro lev tahor.
It does seem that way. However, I am told that he was disturbed by the strength of anti-Lev Tahor sentiment before the Mishpacha piece.
This is a tricky issue, because it’s hard to really know what’s going on there. I tend to be very skeptical about news reports.
I do think that their overall approach is without a mesorah, but I find it hard to believe that the proper course of action is to take their children away from them.
Maskim, but you would have to specify that in the question, rather than seemingly assume that nobody afflicted by ga’avah works on it.
There are many Gedolim including Rav Moshe (I think is one of them) who consider those people Tinik Shenoba
Some hold that way about those who were not taught to keep the Torah (I don’t think R’ Moshe was one of them, though). Someone who was taught to keep the Torah, but rejects it, is not generally considered tinok shenishbah by anyone, and I doubt anyone holds that way about shfichas domim.
So, zd, you pretty much avoided the question rather than answering it.
if Reuvain does not have good middos and haughtily thinks he is better than his neighbors is he really an Oved Hashem??
Great question, Goq. I think you answered it yourself when you mentioned working on yourself.
So, I think the answer is that even if someone is haughty, but is working on improving himself, he is an oved Hashem.
She did if she read my post.
Oomis, I know it’s hard for me to concede, and you did it twice! 🙂
According to the Ramban everyone is equal.
That is clearly not what the Ramban said.
Cute chap by popa, but see ‘??”? ??”? ?’ ??”? ?.
http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14169&st=&pgnum=162&hilite=
Mazel Tov!
May you be zoche to build a bayis ne’eman b’Yisroel!
Popa, ????? ??????? ???? ?????
We go by the husband’s minhagim. Not his halachik rulings (unless he is his own rabbi!!)
“Halachik rulings” doesn’t have to refer to rulings he issues, it could refer to ones he received.
Lol 42.
Goq, zukken are socks.
You promised us a new thread!
Syag, your SN – that shtikah is good.
I don’t know how that works, but I do know that for me, it didn’t show up on two separate browsers.
YCT calls it afikopeople.
Hodulashem, I think we’ve established that it was not a YWN ad, it was probably a third party ad through your browser.
It’s probably motzi shem ra to blame it in YWN.
You are correct, Charlie, but let’s face it; sometimes we can use the extra push.
Sam, this was not a very specific statement. If it was said about a particular individual, you might have a point, because we can never know when a particular gezeirah is sealed. (Although at times, HKB’H might reveal something specific to a tzaddik, so it’s not out of the realm of possibility.)
It is certainly not beyond R’ Vosner, though, to be able to make the connection between a certain type of puroniyus and a certain aveirah.