☕ DaasYochid ☕

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 13,901 through 13,950 (of 20,615 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Divorce in the Frume Veldt #987379
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    +2

    in reply to: Travelling with 3 Adults on the back row #987524
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    PBA, and the size of the passengers.

    in reply to: Ping Pong on Shabbos #987262
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    ROB, I never claimed that every Tanna and Amora knew every sod. In fact, I clearly said otherwise. What I did say is precisely what is clear from those gemaras, that Hashem has many ways of revealing information to Chaza”l. The important thing is that they know the correct facts to pasken; it’s not important whether it’s through personal experience or direct Divine revelation.

    I don’t really think it’s important to define the term hashkofa; I don’t think we should assume we know better than Chaza”l in any area.

    However, if someone thinks they know better than Chaza”l the severity of punishment deserved for a particular aveirah, that’s particularly egregious.

    in reply to: Tzedakah for tuition crisis – NEED DONORS #986817
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Why can’t I pay someone elses tuition as a scholarship and they can pay my tuition as a scholarship.

    Because the IRS reads Yeshiva World.

    in reply to: Ping Pong on Shabbos #987260
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    ROB, the discussion began with your assertion that Chaza”l could ch”v err in hashkofa, which is not a legitimate shittah, and then went on a tangent about Chaza”l erring in science.

    The Gemara actually applies Sod Hashem Li’yereiov to the chachomim’s understanding of the physical world. See Sotah 4b and Sanhedrin 48b for two examples.

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    ZD, thousands of Yidden spend their summers in Sullivan County, and casinos there will tempt some of them.

    in reply to: Ping Pong on Shabbos #987257
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I don’t know who wrote it; I brought it because the first answer is something similar I once heard from an acquaintance of mine, and he also mentions the nireh l’aynayim pshat. I haven’t yet actually read through the entire thing.

    I also didn’t like the motive the author ascrobes to the opposing view; I don’t think he knows it’s a legitimate shittah. He’s probably only heard it from kofrim.

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    ZD, no, but it will add casinos in Sullivan County.

    in reply to: Signs on Shul bulletin board #986664
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    That depends on how many wheels.

    in reply to: Ping Pong on Shabbos #987251
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Found on Hidabroot:

    A: ????? ?????? ????? ?? ??? ??????? ??? ???. ????? ??? ??? ????? ???”? ???? ?????? ????? ????? ?? ???? ????? (??? ?? ??, ?) “????? ????? ??? ????”, ?? ????? ???? ????? ?? ?????? ?????? ?? ??? ?????? ????? “????? ???? ???? ????? ??? ????”! ????? ???? ???? ????? ??”? ????? ?????? ????? ????? ???? ???? ????? ????? ?????? ?”???? ??? ?????? ???? ?????” – ????? ??”? ???? ??? ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ?????! ?????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ?????: “???? ?? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ????? ???, ?????? ?????? ????”. ??? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ???? ???”? ???? ??????? ??????? ??????? ???? ????? ?? ??????, ????? ???? ??????? ???? ??????? ?????? ?? ??????? ????? ?????? ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ????? ???? ????? ???? (??? ??? ????? ????? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ????? ?????), ?????? ???? ???? ?????? ???????? (???, ?, ?) ????? ????? ????? ???? ?? ???? ??? ????? ?????? ??? ???? ???? ???.

    ????? ??? ?????? ?? ????, ????? ?????. ???? ??????? ?????? ????? ??? ?? ????? ??? ?????? ??????, ?????? ??? ??? ????? ??? ???? ?? ???? ????? ????. ?????? ?????, ????? ????? ?? ???? ????? ???? (??????, ??, ????) ???? ???? ????? ?????? ????. ????? ??, ???? ?????? ???????? ?????? ???? ????? ???? ??? “??? ????”, ???? ?? ?? ?????? ????? ?????? ????.

    ????? ???? ????? ??????? ????? ?????? ????? ??: ?????? ??? ?????? ????? ???? ??????, ?????? ?????? ??? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ???? ????? ????. ????? ??? ???? ?????: ??????? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ????? ?? ?? ?????, ?? ???? ??? ?? ???? ??? ????, ??? ??? ?????? ???? ?? ?????. ????? ??? ?????? ????? ????? ????? ????, ????? ?????? ??????, ???? ?????? ???????? ???? ??????? ?? ??????? ????????, ?? ??? ??? ?? ???? ??? ????.

    ?? ?? ?????? ???, ???? ?????? ?? ?? ??? ?????? (???? ???? ???????? ????? ????? ???) ??? ????? ???????? ?? ???? ????? ????. ????? ???, ???? ?????? ?? ???? ?????, ??????? ???? ?????? ?”???? ?????” ???? ??? ?????? ??????? ?????? ????? ????? ???? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ???? ??? ?????. ?? ??, ????? ??? ?? ????? ???? ?????? “????? ?? ???? ????? ????” (?? ????? ??”?, ???? ???? ????? ?? ???? ??????: “???? ???? ??? ?????”).

    ????? ???? ???? ?????? ???? ?????? ???. ????? ????? (??, ?”?) ???? ??? ??????? ???? ?? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ?? ????? ????? ?? ??? ????? ?? ??????. ????? ????? ????? ?? ?? ?????. ????? ?????: “??? ?? ?? ??????”. ????”? ????? ?? ?????: “???? ??????? ?????? ????? ????? ?????? ?????, ????? ??? ???? ??? ??, ??? ???? ???? ????”.

    ??? ????? ?????? ???????? ?? ????? ??? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ????? ????? ???? ???? ???, ??? ?? ??? ???? ???? ?? ??? ????? ????? ???? ?????? ????, ?? ????? ????? ?????? (???? ?? ?????? ??????? ???? ??? ?????? ?? ???? ?? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ????? ???? ??? ??????) ???? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???????.

    ?? ?????? ???? ?????? ?????? ???????, ????? ?????? ??????? ?? ?????? ??????? ???? ???? ????? ????? ?”????? ??????” ?? ?? ??? ???? ????? ?????? ?????? ?? ?????? ??????.

    – ????? ?????? ???? ?? “????? ??????” ???? ??? ????? ??????, ??????: ?? ???? ????? ?? ????? ?? ?????? ?????? ??? ??????.

    ???? ?????? (?? ???? ?-150 ???) ??? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????? ???, ????? ???? ????? ?????? ????, ???? ??? ?? ??? ???? – ??? ??? ??? ????? ?????? ?????? (???? ??? ???? ??, ???? ??):

    “???? ???? ??? ??? ???? ???? ??? ???? ???? ????? ??, ??? ????? ???? ???????, ??? ?? ??, ??? ??? ???????? ???? ??? ?? ????? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ??? ???? ??? ???, ??? ???? ???? ???? ????”. ??? ????: ??? ?????? ??????? ??? ????? ????, ??? ????? ???? ????…!

    in reply to: Ping Pong on Shabbos #987250
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Sam, as I said, there are kashyas. Lice has been debated, well as other cases, with multiple teirutzim (one along the lines of what you said, that “??? ????” doesn’t translate to scientific male/female reproduction). How far you’re willing to stretch to accept a teirutz depends on your version of emunas chachomim.

    Where is R’ SZ”A quoted on this?

    in reply to: Ping Pong on Shabbos #987248
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    ROB, Tannaim and Amoroim.

    in reply to: How much do you give your wife per week for the family budget? #988006
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    The question at the end of the OP was, “any thoughts?”, so all is fair game.

    in reply to: Rabbi Avraham Twerski M.D. v.s. Rabbi Lazer Brody #987110
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    In theory, R’ Brody is probably right. We wouldn’t have to take medications for physical ailments either, is we were on that madreiga. Are we, though? I think I’ll agree with R’ Twerski that we’re not.

    in reply to: Travelling with 3 Adults on the back row #987520
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I don’t know the right answer; I’d probably squeeze a third in, but I don’t know how anyone could call you selfish for making sure your passengers are comfortable.

    in reply to: How much do you give your wife per week for the family budget? #988004
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Maybe she’s secretly using the money to subsidize cleaning help for an unfortunate newly married, expectant woman whose husband refuses to pay for s cleaning lady?

    in reply to: Older Single Age #987424
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    WIY, I think Rose Bank might be a good shidduch for Mort Lach.

    in reply to: Driftwood #987461
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    driftwood

    in reply to: Ping Pong on Shabbos #987246
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Sod Hashem Liyreiov doesn’t mean He tells them every sod, but He does tell them the facts needed for a correct psak. If they figured it out through their own science but got it wrong, He sent the chachmei ho’umos as shlichim to give them the right information.

    You don’t need to ask a kashya from chachmei ho’umos; if individual members of Chaza”l were infallible, how could there be a machlokes amongst them in these inyanim?

    The teirutz is the same; it’s not that individual chachomim are infallible; as great as they are, they’re still bosor vodom. Hashem, however, doesn’t let them err when it would cause an error in halacha.

    in reply to: Older Single Age #987421
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    We’re not talking about single malt whiskey?

    in reply to: Ping Pong on Shabbos #987243
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    DY: That’s more of a problem, then. How could Chazal be Chozer if their original Shittah came from a Mesorah from Sinai/Torah Sheba’al Peh? How could they have been wrong in the first place?

    I don’t know why ??? ?’ ?????? would need to be from a mesorah; Hashem has many ways of revealing things, whether through experience, speaking to contemporaries, drashos, sevaros or Ruach Hakodesh. The only guarantee is that the end result, as stated in Mishnah or Gemara, is accurate.

    in reply to: Older Single Age #987416
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    15.

    I like Glenlivet.

    in reply to: Shalom Bayis Question #986717
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    APY, about 15 months. 🙂

    in reply to: A Suitably Vague Thread Title That You Will Need Your Brain To Interpret #987053
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Yes, VM is correct.

    in reply to: Shalom Bayis Question #986715
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    “agree to hire one until 68 weeks after the baby is born”

    I hope that wasn’t a typo.

    in reply to: Ping Pong on Shabbos #987238
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Sam, there are kashyas, but that particular gemara never really bothered me because l’maskana they agreed.

    in reply to: 9 #986766
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Oomis, different answers, I guess.

    in reply to: 9 #986765
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Gamanit, I think the time shows up according to when it was sent, but thanks.

    in reply to: 9 #986763
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    You’re right, the freshness was nine minutes, but that refers to the time from the most recent post. So it must have taken 2-3 minutes from when I saw the front page until I hit send.

    in reply to: Black hats�nafka minahs? #1024307
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    As another example, Dati Leumi communities, even those which are meticulous in Halacha, define themselves (to borrow your term) by wearing kippot srugot, though the color and material of a kippah is non halachic.

    in reply to: 9 #986760
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I started writing it at 9 minutes.

    in reply to: 9 #986757
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    This is the first time in 147 years that the title, last poster, and # of posts all were only numbers.

    I guess it will happen in another year.

    (Posted when the thread was 9 minutes old.)

    in reply to: Black hats�nafka minahs? #1024306
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Rf, it would have to be that way. Tzitzis can’t define a specific frum community precisely because it is halachic, so all from communities wear them.

    in reply to: Has the CR changed your opinion? #986639
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    A1000, some people have changed their opinions in some matters, but haven’t changed their overall hashkofa.

    in reply to: Ping Pong on Shabbos #987232
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    ROB, if Chaza”l identified the reason for a punishment, we don’t question it. You’re practically bringing them down to your level when you say that if you don’t know the reason for punishments, then they must not either. I don’t see how that that’s not kofer b’divrei Chaza”l.

    I happen to subscribe to the view that Chaza”l didn’t err in science; as the gemara itself says about this inyan, ??? ?’ ??????.

    I just don’t think you can call it kefirah to hold otherwise if the Pachad Yitzchad (Lapronte) did so, although we don’t pasken like him.

    in reply to: Filling out an application�deceased parent #987401
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I’m so sorry to hear about your loss.

    Maybe you can fill in his name followed by a”h.

    ????? ???? ????

    in reply to: Perspective From OTD #986514
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    You can (and perhaps should) tell them not to deal with Minyan or H&J, as that is not as critical.

    Nitpick: I don’t think you tell a kid (directly) not to worry about minyan. It may be appropriate, in some cases, not to be all over them about it (maybe that’s what you meant).

    in reply to: Ping Pong on Shabbos #987228
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    ROB, your response has now been published.

    in reply to: Ping Pong on Shabbos #987226
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Sam, there is definitely some Chaza”l which is allegoric, I just don’t know if you can say it about a gemara with clear halachic implications. Would you say it about the Hahu Gavra gemaras?

    We should probably apply Pascal’s wager to these inyanim, don’t you think?

    in reply to: Has the CR changed your opinion? #986635
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Amen and thank you.

    in reply to: Has the CR changed your opinion? #986632
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    And I’m wondering why you’re wondering why I’m focused on this, beyond what I’ve stated.

    in reply to: Perspective From OTD #986505
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Gavra,

    1) Yes, I wasn’t trying to argue with you (for a change).

    2) I know you’re passionate about differentiating between ikar had in and chumra, but I don’t think there’s a huge one in the context of our discussion. Halachos which are meikar had in can be used manipulatively, and chumras can be taught and implemented lovingly.

    For example, if a parents wants their child to do the right thing because of

    how his behavior reflects on them, the child will sense it and could rebel. If a father practices and teaches chumras out of genuine yiras shomayim, the child is likely to keep them b’simcha.

    Regarding the OP as well, an at risk kid doesn’t necessarily feel any more stifled by chumras than by halachos mi’din.

    3) I know you agreed, but I think you mentioned that the OP was only talking about chumras. You wrote “The issue is how to be flexible within the Torah’s guidelines.”. I understood that (maybe erroneously) to refer to the OP’s issue.

    in reply to: Has the CR changed your opinion? #986630
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Syag, I hear what you’re saying, but I don’t recall any examples of clear, proven-al-pi-halacha, offenders being discussed here and defended. Again, maybe I just missed it.

    Gavra, thank you.

    in reply to: Has the CR changed your opinion? #986627
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Because in dealing with a terrible problem, sometimes another awful problem is created, and the innocent smeared. I know someone going through this right now, l”a

    Your post isactually puzzling. If you’re talking about molesters about whom we are supposed to believe their guilt, why are their defenders not indeed nasty?

    If not, why are the skeptics clueless?

    in reply to: Lyrics for Yesh Tikva #986230
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant
    in reply to: Has the CR changed your opinion? #986623
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Syag, maybe I missed it, but I haven’t seen anyone here opine that known cases of molestation shouldn’t be dealt with.

    The only thing I’ve seen is debate over whether we should assume the guilt of sim ees one we see accused in news reports.

    in reply to: Has the CR changed your opinion? #986619
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Not knowing that they’re molesters.

    Do you have a problem with the presumption of innocence until proven guilty?

    Or, to rephrase, are you referring to situations in which, according to hilchos loshon hora, one is allowed to be mekabel?

    in reply to: Has the CR changed your opinion? #986614
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I’d be surprised to hear differently from anyone.

    I guess I stand corrected.

    Syag, nobody defends molestation.

    in reply to: Has the CR changed your opinion? #986610
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    No. I’d be surprised to hear differently from anyone.

    in reply to: Ping Pong on Shabbos #987222
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    T613, you’re welcome.

Viewing 50 posts - 13,901 through 13,950 (of 20,615 total)