Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant
Can you use a chanukiah for latkes?
December 13, 2017 12:10 am at 12:10 am in reply to: Question I don’t know the answer to :) 🤔 #1426288☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMentch1, you seem to ch”v be accepting option #1…
Please read GAON’s quote. The gemara according to your misquote is simply untenable. Read it correctly and your questions become non existent. It’s not my definition, it’s what the word means.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantInfallible? Wrong religion. No, in the yeshiva world, we don’t believe gedolim are infallible.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantBump
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantOnly problem is that Hashem isn’t limited – He can create a satisfying and just system of He wanted.
Not if “just” doesn’t fit with your definition of “satisfying”…
You know the famous question if Hashem can create a stone so heavy that He can’t lift it? How would you answer it?
I would answer that He can’t, but that isn’t a contradiction to the idea that He is “kol yochol” (unlimited), because the fact the He “can’t” do something which is inherently self contradictory isn’t a limitation in Him, it’s the nature of the paradox you are asking about.
Similarly, if your definition of “satisfying” doesn’t fit in with His (perfect) concept of justice, that’s not a limitation in Him ch”v, it’s a flaw in you.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThe gemarrah paskens that bais shamai is correct “tov shelo nivra adam”
The Gemara actually says “noach lo l’adam shelo nivra”, and misquoting it is a grievous error.
It may indeed not be comfortable (noach) to have been created, and undergo the challenges we do, but ultimately, it is certainly for our best, and chas v’chalilah to say otherwise. Vayar Elokim ki tov.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThe moshol I referred to above is as follows: (apologies for any embellishment or inaccuracy)
A man with no marketable skills begs a distant relative, a wealthy owner of many factories and businesses, for a job.
He hires him to work in one of his factories, as a kindness.
Years later, the owner, who doesn’t even remember this man, decides to visit this factory.
He calls a meeting for all employees, and asks each what his job is.
One replies that he works on the product design, another that he does maintenance of the facility, another that he does inventory, etc.
Finally, it’s his relative’s turn. The poor fellow, clearly embarrassed, sheepishly looks down and mutters, “every day I come to the factory and collect my wages”.
That’s called “nahama d’kisufa” – bread of shame.
As I recall, the Chofetz Chaim used this moshol to explain why, since Hashem created us for our own benefit, ultimately, as the Mesilas Yesharim says, “l’hisaneg al Hashem v’leihanos miziv sh’chinoso” – for the ultimate reward which awaits us in the World to Come – why couldn’t He have simply put us all in Gan Eden without all of the mitzvos (positive and negative), which are tremendous challenges?
He answers with the above moshol, and I believe it also answers why we need punishment and suffering.
Chabadshluchah, the fellow you refer to may counter that it still doesn’t explain why Hashem had to create such a system, but I think the answer to that is that a system without reward and punishment, and the benefits of earning the reward by working for it (and the possibility of punishment and suffering for sinning) is inherently not a just system.
Yes, Hashem has the ability to do anything, but that doesn’t mean it is His will to do something which is not inherently just and correct.
So, in order to create a just world with the potential for us to obtain the utmost reward and pleasure, He created a system with reward and punishment, which sometimes takes the form of suffering.
May Hashem help this poor fellow to see the truth.
December 11, 2017 12:16 am at 12:16 am in reply to: Spiritual Significance of Jerusalem and embassy announcement #1424026☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantNo one of the frum Zionists recognizes him as anything great.
I assume ZionGate is frum.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThe bottom line, though, is that it’s not really an intellectual question, it’s an emotional one. You mentioned that this person had a great deal of suffering…
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI think the Chofetz Chaim gives a moshol, which I don’t have time to write out now, but the short answer is: nahama d’kisufa.
December 10, 2017 4:20 pm at 4:20 pm in reply to: Spiritual Significance of Jerusalem and embassy announcement #1423837☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThe Rebbe was not actively opposed to zionism
If that’s the case, he went against his predecessors.
December 10, 2017 4:19 pm at 4:19 pm in reply to: Spiritual Significance of Jerusalem and embassy announcement #1423836☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMy Torah references Yerushalayim so many times as G-D’s abode
That has nothing to do with Trump announcing that he recognizes it as the political capital and plans to move the embassy there.
December 10, 2017 1:48 pm at 1:48 pm in reply to: Spiritual Significance of Jerusalem and embassy announcement #1423534☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantYes, CS, I would love to hear why you think putting Yiddishe lives at risk is a good thing.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantBounty is better than Kirkland, but more expensive. If you often clean up large spills and use several paper towels at a time, you might end up saving money with the Bounty. If you most often use one at a time, you might be better off with the Kirkland.
Kirkland is also better than Sparkle, so you really can’t lump all name brand towels into one category.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI can’t prove you wrong on the CR, but just take copy paper and store brand paper towels (I use Costco’s Kirkland Signature) and see which absorbs a spill better.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantthe chareidi mesorah of prioritizing sitting and learning all day only dates to the establishment of Israel. In the centuries leading up to ww2, only the best and brightest learned all day as the social state didn’t exist. If you wanted to eat, you had to work. There was no Meficaid etc
In other words, the ideals haven’t changed, but outside circumstances have, so that now people can learn for longer, which wasn’t possible in other generations. Had it been possible, they would have done so as well.
Is that what you’re saying?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantPersonally I think the reason more MO’s leave (As a percentage wise) is because the mo community is more accepting of people “less than MO” meaning you will get people who are more on the margins and a greater chance of leaving
It could work the other way – because a broader range of people can be accepted as MO, they should have less of a dropout rate.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWhere do all of these numbers come from?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantLol daas yochid, is an amazing day :):)
Then why do you connect it with a meaningless symbolic announcement which puts many Jewish lives in danger, Hashem yishmor?
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantthe significance of the embassy announcement on yud tes Kislev
I thought Yud Tes Kislev was supposed to be a good day…
December 7, 2017 10:29 am at 10:29 am in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1421887☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIt seems from Syag’s comment she holds Mr. Carlebach in much greater esteem than, say, MBD
She can speak for herself if she chooses, but I did not get that impression whatsoever.
December 6, 2017 11:54 pm at 11:54 pm in reply to: Calling All Chacha-Chacha Hebrew and Yiddish Readers! #1421656☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIf you’re at a distance, how can you tell if there are ayins and mems etc.?
December 6, 2017 9:52 pm at 9:52 pm in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1421617☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI find it quite annoying that almost none
of this thread (I don’t count Avi’s obvious nonsense) is discussion of the
article and instead is a discussion of Shlomo Carlebach’s listening habits.Oops, sorry. For a minute I thought this was the Coffee Room.
December 6, 2017 9:49 pm at 9:49 pm in reply to: Calling All Chacha-Chacha Hebrew and Yiddish Readers! #1421615☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantNo, I can’t even tell if it’s Chinese or Russian.
December 6, 2017 8:27 pm at 8:27 pm in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1421568☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSyag, why does this information about Carebach disappoint you more than knowing MBD used non-Jewish tunes?
I see two differences. One, I don’t think MBD ever claimed that he never “borrowed” secular tunes, but according to oshriv, Carlebach did make such a claim – in fact he claimed he never listened to it. Two, the big Carlebach people like to think that his music is 100% authentic Jewish music, not influenced by anything else. It’s simply not true; he certainly borrowed elements of his style from folk music and other styles.
(answering for myself)December 6, 2017 12:42 pm at 12:42 pm in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1421176☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantBut Mr know all , upon investigation it came to light that Reb Moishe was answering the שואל not knowing who he was referring to but once he was told the שואל was referring to Reb Shlomo he was most upset as he held very highly of him
Are you denying that he performed in front of mixed crowds, which is the basis for R’ Moshe having an issue with him?
Also, are you denying that Kumbaya and Ki Va Moed are secular tunes?
December 6, 2017 12:39 pm at 12:39 pm in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1421175☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantDaMoshe, I was unaware of that, but I looked into it and it’s true – the high part of Ki Va Moed is from there, note for note.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI don’t know how cheftza/gavra comes in here.
If the recipient is not even eligible for tzedakah, it’s not tzedakah. He gets credit for his good intentions, but he is not mekayem the mitzvah.
December 6, 2017 10:24 am at 10:24 am in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1420960☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantPlease don’t speak in the name of all .
I know of not a single sin , but disscusting it here will just cause you to loosen your mouth further with הוצאת שם רע .See Igros Moshe, Even Ho’ezer Vol. 1, 96
December 6, 2017 10:01 am at 10:01 am in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1420902☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantKumbaya
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThis is the vodka song I know:
Nye zhuritzi chloptzi shtoh s’nami budiet mi paidem nuh karchunki tam ie vodka budiet.
L’chaim!
December 6, 2017 8:17 am at 8:17 am in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1420848☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantAvi K, I didn’t opine about whether it may be a problem to listen to any secular music. I’m simply noting that Shlomo Carlebach did, regardless of any claims to the contrary.
If you want to know my opinion on secular music, I think some is problematic, and some isn’t.
The same is actually true for “Jewish” music, but with a smaller percentages being disagreeable and to a much lesser degree.
December 6, 2017 8:15 am at 8:15 am in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1420849☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantOshriv, I spoke nothing about his ahavas Yisroel, but his sins were well known, and although he was a smart person, calling him a “gaon” is ludicrous.
Unless you meant a gaon in ahavas Yisroel, in which case I don’t think the terminology is apt, but again, I won’t argue that he wasn’t an ohev Yisroel.
I think it’s wrong to look at him as a role model (although one can learn from anyone’s ma’alos, including him).
Mostly, I was rejecting the simply non factual claim that he wasn’t exposed to secular music.
December 6, 2017 1:18 am at 1:18 am in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1420775☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantNow it’s recorded on official videos recordings where he stresses that he never listened to secular music .
If all he did wrong was listening to secular music, it wouldn’t have been so terrible…
Fact is though, that he did. He even played and sang some.
There’s even a recording of him doing a cover of a secular song.
December 5, 2017 6:02 pm at 6:02 pm in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1420499☕ DaasYochid ☕Participanti know now i will be bombarded with comments , but i can back it up ,
How would you back up something which is so clearly untrue?
December 5, 2017 12:50 pm at 12:50 pm in reply to: Where do you place your hat during Shachris? #1419097☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI find a bochur not wearing a hat and stick it on his head.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantthis is often a kneejerk response to shut down halachic discussions
I don’t think it’s ever stopped you or me. 🙂
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIm a gabbai in a weekday minyan that has no Rav. My rule is KUL DIALAM GVAR
Why don’t you learn the halachos?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIs that a dish made by Mechi’s deli?
December 3, 2017 10:18 pm at 10:18 pm in reply to: WaPo Article When Lubavitcher Rebbe Was Niftar #1417533☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThere is a letter from Rabbi Aharon Soloveitchik who was very affiliated with the litvishe world
I don’t know what you mean by “very affiliated with the litvishe world”, but he and his opinions weren’t necessarily considered mainstream.
Anyhow, if you’re going to quote him, don’t leave out the part where he says he thinks the Rebbe is not moshiach.
December 3, 2017 10:18 pm at 10:18 pm in reply to: WaPo Article When Lubavitcher Rebbe Was Niftar #1417535☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIf Moshiach were to come from the dead, wouldn’t Dovid Mamelech himself be the ideal candidate?
Or Daniel Ish Chamudos.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantit can be asked why did the gabbai not ask the rov.
That’s not what I was addressing.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWhen the question comes up in shul?
I don’t understand your premise. Why can’t shailos which come up in shul be discussed on the CR?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI hope people aren’t reading the CR in shul.
As far as the actual halacha, it’s a machlokes (as I recall, the Aruch Hashulchan brings both sides), so is very much dependant on minhag hamakom.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantConsidering the fact that the Chazon Ish meikar hadin held like the Pri Chodosh, I am quite skeptical that Rav Vozner wouldn’t be meikil b’sha’as had’chak (albeit with more stringent paramaters for sha’as had’chak than R’ Moshe).
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI just put all the ingredients in the pot and let it do its thing.
I turn the fire on too. This way it cooks.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSam, DY, – How easy/difficult do you think it is for a person described in the OP to be able to self-learn the language?
Sorry, there’s not enough information for me to even hazard a guess.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantAnd many hold that which is called Cholov Stam is Cholov Akum mamish.
Name them.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIt causes Sfeikie B’Emunah…
What does?
-
AuthorPosts