Joseph

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,251 through 1,300 (of 3,685 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Amateur Radio #888660
    Joseph
    Participant

    What did you do for in the Army?

    in reply to: Favorite Drinks #640339
    Joseph
    Participant

    moish, extremely rarely (other than Kiddush).

    in reply to: POLL: The Big Event Concert; Big Flop? Or Best Show? #640239
    Joseph
    Participant

    Jothar, I hope you don’t look at Gedolei Yisroel Shlita, especially so many of them together, c’v as bumbling fools who can be “forced” or fooled. The single Godol’s foresight is better than your hindsight; al achas kama v’kama the collective Gedolim’s foresight about what they put their signature to…

    in reply to: Adults With ADD or ADHD in The Yeshiva World #639287
    Joseph
    Participant

    ames, what do you use that one for? 😉

    in reply to: Amateur Radio #888658
    Joseph
    Participant

    How long are you licensed?

    in reply to: Amateur Radio #888656
    Joseph
    Participant

    How much time do you spend on it?

    in reply to: Need a Scholarship to go to Seminary #639256
    Joseph
    Participant

    I said not keen.

    in reply to: Adults With ADD or ADHD in The Yeshiva World #639284
    Joseph
    Participant

    See your psychiatrists.

    in reply to: Amateur Radio #888654
    Joseph
    Participant

    Why not a vanity call?

    in reply to: Is a Boy Looking to Date a Girl or a Chavrusah? #1218007
    Joseph
    Participant

    SJS, The truth is Torah does better in times of poverty than in times of wealth.

    in reply to: #639646
    Joseph
    Participant

    ames, where does that minhug stem from?

    in reply to: Amateur Radio #888652
    Joseph
    Participant

    Pashuteh, what class license?

    in reply to: Favorite Drinks #640334
    Joseph
    Participant

    Pina colada

    in reply to: Adults With ADD or ADHD in The Yeshiva World #639280
    Joseph
    Participant

    Then there must be many such sufferers here.

    in reply to: Amateur Radio #888651
    Joseph
    Participant

    Pashuteh, Glad to hear.

    The FCC, by law, must respect freedom of religion, so they couldn’t discriminate based upon Jewish religious beliefs.

    in reply to: POLL: The Big Event Concert; Big Flop? Or Best Show? #640235
    Joseph
    Participant

    Jothar, it was signed by many Gedolei Yisroel Shlita last year. Doesn’t matter who distributed it.

    in reply to: Coca-Cola Classic and Yiddishkeit #640863
    Joseph
    Participant

    Coke’s hechsher, unless they changed it, is etched on top of the cans and printed on the label of the bottles.

    in reply to: What is a Yeshiva Education Worth to You? #641990
    Joseph
    Participant

    Birth control, for financial reasons, is assur.

    in reply to: What is a Yeshiva Education Worth to You? #641989
    Joseph
    Participant

    squeak, how do the Chasidishe Yeshiva’s have (relatively speaking) dirt cheap tuition rates? Even Chaim Berlin’s (etc.) “rack rates” are below your assumptions.

    in reply to: What is a Yeshiva Education Worth to You? #641988
    Joseph
    Participant

    Jothar, Every single point and assumption you made is completely incorrect. Every one. Lock, stock, and barrel.

    in reply to: Amateur Radio #888650
    Joseph
    Participant

    kd5vdo, what class license do you have?

    in reply to: Is a Boy Looking to Date a Girl or a Chavrusah? #1218005
    Joseph
    Participant

    Torah is unaffiliated with the performance of the S&P 500.

    in reply to: Need a Scholarship to go to Seminary #639254
    Joseph
    Participant

    The Federation and ZOA are not very keen on supporting a Chareidi institution.

    in reply to: Adults With ADD or ADHD in The Yeshiva World #639278
    Joseph
    Participant

    Talk about a change in subject.

    in reply to: Collecting On Purim in a Limousine #1010518
    Joseph
    Participant

    squeak, you must’ve been very free that Purim…

    in reply to: It’s Witless W’s Fault! #642891
    Joseph
    Participant

    I completely concur with Feivel.

    in reply to: Why Do You Come To The CR? #993539
    Joseph
    Participant

    squeak – how ’bout yourself?

    in reply to: Is a Boy Looking to Date a Girl or a Chavrusah? #1218003
    Joseph
    Participant

    Jothar, sounds like your tzedaka org is competing with the Kollelim for the greenbacks, lol.

    in reply to: What is a Yeshiva Education Worth to You? #641977
    Joseph
    Participant

    cantoresq – your assumptions are completely misguided.

    ames – “gut gefregt” effectively means good question! (with the exclamation point.) 🙂

    in reply to: POLL: The Big Event Concert; Big Flop? Or Best Show? #640203
    Joseph
    Participant

    Jothar, don’t put much stock in “blogs” and “various papers.” You can put your faith in the Gedolei Yisroel Shlita, and there quite a large number of Gedolim in that case, had good cause to issue last years Kol Korei.

    in reply to: Cholov Akum #772703
    Joseph
    Participant

    Jothar, The Baalei Batim are not Bnei Torah in your town?

    in reply to: Talking With Members of The Opposite Gender #663063
    Joseph
    Participant
    in reply to: Good Forwards (Emails) #1059042
    Joseph
    Participant

    39, Are you stating YWN is now monitoring the accuracy of all posts, and will only post after verification (and hence the readership can rely on the good faith efforts of the mods)?

    I really wish I was, but, unfortunately, I will take your word for it when you quote a tur or some other miforesh. (In other words, no Joseph, I did not say that!)

    The blatant ones (lies/misquotes) don’t get published. TRUST ME, YOU SHOULD SEE THE TRASH WE TRASH . Man power and time limit us in this endeavor (side point, this is why longer posts take longer to get approved). There is a reason, though, for why we the policy of the mods is to either delete, or “leave for another mod” those things you question whether or not they belong on The Yeshiva World .

    YW Moderator-39

    in reply to: Coca-Cola Classic and Yiddishkeit #640851
    Joseph
    Participant

    Colonel Moish is a tzaddik gamur. Never takes credit from others. Always worried about yenem’s kovod.

    in reply to: Bring Back the ”Joke of the Day”!!!! #639728
    Joseph
    Participant

    Open Book, Colonel Moish will assign you a title.

    in reply to: Bring Back the ”Joke of the Day”!!!! #639723
    Joseph
    Participant

    The “Chairman.”

    in reply to: Bring Back the ”Joke of the Day”!!!! #639719
    Joseph
    Participant

    Affirmed!

    signed, Joseph

    King of the CR

    in reply to: What is a Yeshiva Education Worth to You? #641967
    Joseph
    Participant

    cantor, it is assur to even enter a conservative church.

    in reply to: Talking With Members of The Opposite Gender #663060
    Joseph
    Participant

    TJ, If someone asked you to call them on Shabbos, and you telling them sorry I can’t do that would embarrass them for asking, would you be mechalel shabbos to prevent their embarrassment? Or if someone offered you non-kosher food and refusing would embarrass them, would you eat treif? You cannot be oiver an issur (especially d’oraisa) to avoid embarassing someone – no in these examples and not in negiah. Especially not for a nochri.

    in reply to: YWN Coffee Room Nightly D’Var Torah #1123855
    Joseph
    Participant

    L’Chaim; may the neshama have an aliya!

    in reply to: Talking With Members of The Opposite Gender #663059
    Joseph
    Participant

    TJ, Actually you are incorrect regarding Reb Yaakov paskening it permissable to shake hands to avoid embarasement. In the mekor provided, Reb Yaakov states “Regarding returning a handshake to women when they extend their hand first in greeting, not in an affectionate manner, this is a very serious question and it is difficult to be lenient.” Reb Yaakov goes on to state that in a situation where there will cause embarasement, it requires further study whether it is permissable to be lenient or not. He never paskened one may be lenient in such a situation.

    There is two prohibitions about this: 1) The Torah commanded to avoid all women with the status of nidah (Vayikra 18:19). and 2) It might lead to improper thoughts, which are prohibited (Kesuvos 46a; Shulhan Aruch, Even Haezer 23:3).

    Reb Moshe, multiple times in the Igros Moshe, is very clear that it is assur:

    1) EH I #56 page 144

    “Concerning that which you saw people being lenient even those who are

    yirei shamayim – to offer their hand to a woman when she stuck her hand

    out. Perhaps they reasoned that this is not derech chibah and taavah –

    but l’maaseh this is difficult to rely on.”

    2) OC I 113 page 177

    “To offer one’s hand to a woman in the manner of those greeting others

    upon meeting. It is pashut that it is prohibited even for an unmarried

    woman since they are niddah and surely it is prohibited for a married

    woman”.

    3) EH IV 32.9 page 76

    “To offer one’s hand to a woman in the manner of those greeting others

    upon meeting. It is definitely pashut that it is prohibited as I have

    written OC I 113. That is because one needs to be concerned for the issue

    of derech chibah and taavah. But I wrote in EH I #56…that one is to

    dan l’kaf zechus those who are relying that it is not derech chibah and

    taavah to shake hands. But there I wrote that l’maashe it is difficult

    to rely on this. Furthermore I don’t see any inconsistency at all with

    that which I permitted a person to travel on a bus because there –

    there is basically no issue of chibah.”

    Even if it causes embarassement it is assur according to Reb Moshe (see Halichos Bas Yisrael, vol. I, p. 110 n.33) and Nine to Five – A Guide to Modest Conduct for Today’s Workplace by Rav Shmuel Neiman, p.14 (“it has been rumored that Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, zt”l, ruled that it is permissible for men and women to shake hands. Nothing could be further from the truth! In his responsa, he agonized over this unacceptable practice and repeatedly stated that it is forbidden and infringes on giluy arayos”).

    The Chazon Ish stated [re: a man shaking a woman’s hand who is not his spouse, his mother, his daughter, or his granddaughter] [p.p. 130-131])

    A Yeshiva student from England refused to shake hands with his step-mother when greeting her. His father was extremely upset with his refusal. He demanded his son display “derech eretz” towards his step-mother and shake her hand. The son refused stating he was taught it was impermissable with a non close blood relative. This affected the fathers relationship with the son. Some family members told the son to give in al sholom bayis. The son asked a shaila from the Chazon Ish. The Chazon Ish responded with a short and sharp answer – “Chok V’lo Yaavor, Issur Gamur” (It is a prohibition that one dare not violate; It is absolutely forbidden,) Violating this halacha was out of the question despite sholom bayis and kibud av. (Oz Vehadar, p. 494).

    Its also paskened assur in Responsa Be’er Moshe 4:130, and the Od Yosef Chai (by the Gaon Ben Ish Chai zt’l) Shoftim #22 where they rule it is totally assur. The Sefer Chassidim # 1090 writes one should not shake hands even if the person of the opposite gender is not Jewish.

    Rav Shmuel Neiman, in Nine to Five: A Guide to Modest Conduct for Today’s Workplace writes regarding male-female interaction in the workplace:

    It is forbidden to make small talk about matters unrelated to business. Men and women working together should not discuss politics, current events, recent tragedies or gossip, even if they do not do so regularly. Discussing these matters on a daily basis, is a violation of halachos that border on giluy arayos, which requires one to sacrifice his life rather than transgress. (p. 9)

    When conversing with female employees or co-workers, one must be careful not to us the word “we,” so that the man and woman are not referred to as one unit. For example, one should not say, “We must talk with the editor,” or “We must purchase that software program.” Rather, he should say, “The editor must be consulted,” or “Please purchase that program.” (pp. 10-11)

    It is a custom amongst yirei shomayim not to call a woman other than one’s wife or immediate family member by her first name, thus keeping a respectful distance between the two parties. Referring to a woman by her first name brings inappropriate familiarity into the relationship. Similarly, a woman should refrain from addressing a man other than her husband or immediate family member by his first name. (p. 20)

    It is appropriate for male and female employees [to] refrain from all conversation when they meet anywhere outside of the office. This includes not discussing even job-related matters when meeting in the hallway or elevator at work.

    in reply to: Chess Match – squeak vs SJSinNYC #1187093
    Joseph
    Participant

    awwwwwww, squeak is such an honest fellow! 🙂

    in reply to: Biden Asks For Web Site’s ‘Number’ #639642
    Joseph
    Participant

    squeak,

    I am indeed correct. There was no “Internet” until the ’80’s. So whatever e-mail address you had was a non-internet e-mail address. (May have been ARPANET, the Internet’s predecessor, but that would entail a University with a DoD affiliation.)

    In the ’90’s I spoke to Jon Postel several times and corresponded with other Internet “founding fathers” (Paul Mockapetris, Paul Vixie, Vint Cerf) as well as top official at the Department of Commerce after they assumed jurisdiction of Internet governance issues from the National Science Foundation.

    in reply to: Funny or Interesting Vanity Plates #700621
    Joseph
    Participant

    39,

    1. It was pre-scanning days.

    2. Now you can merely scratch off a bar (prior to applying the sticker), forcing the meter maids to write it out manually.

    3. If the summons has an incorrect plate #, the ticket was effectively never written against your vehicle and you can discard it.

    4. If you choose to challenge it, it is legally flawed (in NYC at least) and an ALJ will dismiss it.

    in reply to: Funny or Interesting Vanity Plates #700617
    Joseph
    Participant

    39, the meter maids mostly wrote the tickets out w/the wrong plate # in the first place – and he could just throw it out.

    in reply to: Good Forwards (Emails) #1059030
    Joseph
    Participant

    39, any prob w/saying gut gefregt or the dvar torah that took an hour to compile in the gender thread?

    Should be up by now. Sorry, Yiddish isn’t my language, I was hopping another mod would do the ‘dirty work’

    YW Moderator-39

    in reply to: Funny or Interesting Vanity Plates #700615
    Joseph
    Participant

    asdf, the Cops usually never write a ticket to VAS (Volunteer Ambulance Service) plates.

    qwerty, I once got someone a plate, something like, Z0OM 5O0O (notice the confusing altering of 0’s and O’s.) He got a few thousand dollar worth of tickets that were written out incorrect and hence dismissed as defective.

    in reply to: Funny or Interesting Vanity Plates #700612
    Joseph
    Participant

    Anyone notice the vanity plates designed to fool ticket-writers? Like substituting zeros (0) and the letter O, or the number 1 and the letter I.

    in reply to: What is a Yeshiva Education Worth to You? #641964
    Joseph
    Participant

    ames, gut gefregt!

    in reply to: Talking With Members of The Opposite Gender #663057
    Joseph
    Participant

    TJ, Actually you are incorrect regarding Reb Yaakov paskening it permissable to shake hands to avoid embarasement. In the mekor provided, Reb Yaakov states “Regarding returning a handshake to women when they extend their hand first in greeting, not in an affectionate manner, this is a very serious question and it is difficult to be lenient.” Reb Yaakov goes on to state that in a situation where there will cause embarasement, it requires further study whether it is permissable to be lenient or not. He never paskened one may be lenient in such a situation.

    There is two prohibitions about this: 1) The Torah commanded to avoid all women with the status of nidah (Vayikra 18:19). and 2) It might lead to improper thoughts, which are prohibited (Kesuvos 46a; Shulhan Aruch, Even Haezer 23:3).

    Reb Moshe, multiple times in the Igros Moshe, is very clear that it is assur:

    1) EH I #56 page 144

    “Concerning that which you saw people being lenient even those who are

    yirei shamayim – to offer their hand to a woman when she stuck her hand

    out. Perhaps they reasoned that this is not derech chibah and taavah –

    but l’maaseh this is difficult to rely on.”

    2) OC I 113 page 177

    “To offer one’s hand to a woman in the manner of those greeting others

    upon meeting. It is pashut that it is prohibited even for an unmarried

    woman since they are niddah and surely it is prohibited for a married

    woman”.

    3) EH IV 32.9 page 76

    “To offer one’s hand to a woman in the manner of those greeting others

    upon meeting. It is definitely pashut that it is prohibited as I have

    written OC I 113. That is because one needs to be concerned for the issue

    of derech chibah and taavah. But I wrote in EH I #56…that one is to

    dan l’kaf zechus those who are relying that it is not derech chibah and

    taavah to shake hands. But there I wrote that l’maashe it is difficult

    to rely on this. Furthermore I don’t see any inconsistency at all with

    that which I permitted a person to travel on a bus because there –

    there is basically no issue of chibah.”

    Even if it causes embarassement it is assur according to Reb Moshe (see Halichos Bas Yisrael, vol. I, p. 110 n.33) and Nine to Five – A Guide to Modest Conduct for Today’s Workplace by Rav Shmuel Neiman, p.14 (“it has been rumored that Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, zt”l, ruled that it is permissible for men and women to shake hands. Nothing could be further from the truth! In his responsa, he agonized over this unacceptable practice and repeatedly stated that it is forbidden and infringes on giluy arayos”).

    The Chazon Ish stated [re: a man shaking a woman’s hand who is not his spouse, his mother, his daughter, or his granddaughter] [p.p. 130-131])

    A Yeshiva student from England refused to shake hands with his step-mother when greeting her. His father was extremely upset with his refusal. He demanded his son display “derech eretz” towards his step-mother and shake her hand. The son refused stating he was taught it was impermissable with a non close blood relative. This affected the fathers relationship with the son. Some family members told the son to give in al sholom bayis. The son asked a shaila from the Chazon Ish. The Chazon Ish responded with a short and sharp answer – “Chok V’lo Yaavor, Issur Gamur” (It is a prohibition that one dare not violate; It is absolutely forbidden,) Violating this halacha was out of the question despite sholom bayis and kibud av. (Oz Vehadar, p. 494).

    Its also paskened assur in Responsa Be’er Moshe 4:130, and the Od Yosef Chai (by the Gaon Ben Ish Chai zt’l) Shoftim #22 where they rule it is totally assur. The Sefer Chassidim # 1090 writes one should not shake hands even if the person of the opposite gender is not Jewish.

    Rav Shmuel Neiman, in Nine to Five: A Guide to Modest Conduct for Today’s Workplace writes regarding male-female interaction in the workplace:

    It is forbidden to make small talk about matters unrelated to business. Men and women working together should not discuss politics, current events, recent tragedies or gossip, even if they do not do so regularly. Discussing these matters on a daily basis, is a violation of halachos that border on giluy arayos, which requires one to sacrifice his life rather than transgress. (p. 9)

    When conversing with female employees or co-workers, one must be careful not to us the word “we,” so that the man and woman are not referred to as one unit. For example, one should not say, “We must talk with the editor,” or “We must purchase that software program.” Rather, he should say, “The editor must be consulted,” or “Please purchase that program.” (pp. 10-11)

    It is a custom amongst yirei shomayim not to call a woman other than one’s wife or immediate family member by her first name, thus keeping a respectful distance between the two parties. Referring to a woman by her first name brings inappropriate familiarity into the relationship. Similarly, a woman should refrain from addressing a man other than her husband or immediate family member by his first name. (p. 20)

    It is appropriate for male and female employees [to] refrain from all conversation when they meet anywhere outside of the office. This includes not discussing even job-related matters when meeting in the hallway or elevator at work.

Viewing 50 posts - 1,251 through 1,300 (of 3,685 total)