Joseph

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,301 through 1,350 (of 3,685 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What is a Yeshiva Education Worth to You? #641961
    Joseph
    Participant

    ames, gut gefregt!

    in reply to: POLL: The Big Event Concert; Big Flop? Or Best Show? #640200
    Joseph
    Participant

    I made a general statement. Don’t know much about this Lipa guy’s situation.

    in reply to: POLL: The Big Event Concert; Big Flop? Or Best Show? #640197
    Joseph
    Participant

    not signing does not equate to a lack of opposition.

    in reply to: Talking With Members of The Opposite Gender #663055
    Joseph
    Participant

    TJ, thanks for the mekor. I’ll have to check it. Regarding a possible heter for embarrasing, aside for the illogical tainas against it I listed and Reb Moshe paskening against it, such a heter wouldnt even be plausible with shaking with a goy – as there is no issur to embarass a goy.

    in reply to: Is a Boy Looking to Date a Girl or a Chavrusah? #1218000
    Joseph
    Participant

    Kollel = Torah = necessity.

    in reply to: What is a Yeshiva Education Worth to You? #641954
    Joseph
    Participant

    Yes, its certainly worth giving up all luxuries for (in fact it may be an obligation.)

    in reply to: Is a Boy Looking to Date a Girl or a Chavrusah? #1217999
    Joseph
    Participant

    SJS, Shulchan Aruch, etc. says it IS tiflus.

    in reply to: To Drink or Not to Drink? #674643
    Joseph
    Participant

    No where have I said otherwise.

    in reply to: Amateur Radio #888645
    Joseph
    Participant

    Rosh – Google it.

    in reply to: Talking With Members of The Opposite Gender #663051
    Joseph
    Participant

    TJ, I don’t believe Reb Yaakov ever said any such thing regarding a heter for embarrassment. Do you have a mekor for that? I think not. The most “authoritative” source to claim a heter for embarrassment is supposedly Rabbi Y.B. Soloveitchek; but even that is mere claims and no mekor. Reb Moshe wrote befeirush in the quoted IM that shaking hands is always assur under all circumstances. Period. It is an issur d’oraysah.

    in reply to: Talking With Members of The Opposite Gender #663048
    Joseph
    Participant

    It is an issur d’oraysah. Reb Moshe, in the Igros Moshe, states that Lo Sikrevu means you can’t talk to girls. Rav Moshe is quoting a statment of Chazal in Avos D’Reb Nosson and rulings of the Ran and others. Avos: “Al tarbeh sichah im haishah” – Do not talk more than necessary with women. The Mishnah continues: “Whoever does talk more than necessary with women causes bad for himself . . . and in the end will end up in Gehinnom!” Re derech chibah: The Halachah (Rambam) prohibits negiyah even in a non-affectionate manner. Casual negiyah is also prohibited — see the Steipler’s Letters quoting the Chazon Ish for details — even if it doesn’t “mean anything”. Even regarding a simple handshake between strangers, Rav Moshe writes that you should not rely on this as a heter.

    Lo Sikrevu – the Torah prohibition of touching – is referring even to non-affectionate touching, according to the Rambam. The Ramban argues, and holds that non-affectionate touching is not included in the possuk, but is assur nonetheless m’drabbanan. The prohibition of Lo Sikravu applies to all ages equally. There is no logic in saying that an explicit Torah prohibition is “not talking” about certain ages.

    Shulchan Aruch Even HaEzer:

    “A person must stay far, far away from the women, and it is prohibited to signal with your hand, to hint with your eyes, to any prohibited women. It is furthermore prohibited to laugh together with them and to be frivolous in her presence, or to watch her beauty. Even to smell her perfume is forbidden….”

    Rav Moshe addressed the Derech Chibah issue in his Teshuva, saying that whenever boys and girls are friends, even innocently, that is considered Assur, like Derech Chibah. R. Moshe Feinstein repeatedly (Iggeros Moshe, Orach Chaim vol. 1 no. 113; Even Ha-Ezer vol. 1 no. 56) ruled that a man enjoys shaking a woman’s hand and it is therefore

    prohibited. The Steipler writes in his letters in the name of the Chazon Ish that it is absolutely prohibited. Regarding a so-called heter that you will embarass her if you don’t shake hands, it’s simple logic: If someone asked you to call them on Shabbos and you telligng them sorry I cant do that would embarrass them for asking, would you be mechalel shabbos to prevent their embarrassment? Or if someone offered you non-kosher food and refusing would embarrass them would you eat treif?

    in reply to: POLL: The Big Event Concert; Big Flop? Or Best Show? #640192
    Joseph
    Participant

    Jothar, don’t give much credence to those websites you quote.

    in reply to: Collecting On Purim in a Limousine #1010496
    Joseph
    Participant

    squeak put it best.

    in reply to: An Eitza Against The Yetzer Harah. #640067
    Joseph
    Participant

    areivim, so how do you explain the anonymity?

    in reply to: Is a Boy Looking to Date a Girl or a Chavrusah? #1217997
    Joseph
    Participant

    Jothar, I made no reference to most of your points in my previous comments.

    in reply to: Biden Asks For Web Site’s ‘Number’ #639637
    Joseph
    Participant

    squeak, what I stated is indeed correct. The only academia on ARPANET (which was what today’s Internet was called then) were Universities that were Defense contractors (or sub-scontractors), i.e. the University of Southern California/Information Science Institure, etc. (Perhaps there was even one in the Garden State.) The broader academic community joined in the ’80’s, with the National Science Foundation establishing the NSFNet and connecting it to the ARPANet via the new TCP/IP protocal, effectively establishing the Internet.

    Your e-mail account, assuming it was an ARPANET one, must’ve been from an institution somehow related to Defense.

    in reply to: Funny or Interesting Vanity Plates #700591
    Joseph
    Participant

    chashmal is a corruption of loshon kodesh and the Torah.

    in reply to: Biden Asks For Web Site’s ‘Number’ #639635
    Joseph
    Participant

    squeak, the net (ARPANET) was a military netwerk in the ’70’s. Academia (NSFNet) joined in the ’80’s. AOL = newbies, Prodigy = beinenim, CompuServe = techies.

    in reply to: Why Do You Come To The CR? #993515
    Joseph
    Participant

    reverse psychology?

    in reply to: Injured Good Samaritan Ticketed For Jaywalking #639046
    Joseph
    Participant

    The Samaritans are the Kusim discussed in the Gemorah and elsewhere. They made lots of trouble for Klal Yisroel.

    in reply to: You’re In Charge of Brooklyn Jewry… What Do You Do? #1111296
    Joseph
    Participant

    I am in constant touch with Rav Elyashev Shlita, and do whatever he decrees.

    in reply to: Is a Boy Looking to Date a Girl or a Chavrusah? #1217991
    Joseph
    Participant

    Syag,

    No, Kollel is NOT a luxury, it is a necessity.

    However, realize that although you may have been temporarily relieved from your responsibilities, this is a free gift.

    Incorrect. His responsibility, and he has NOT been relieved of it, is to learn Torah Hakedosha. He is not the recipient of a “free gift”, rather society is. He is providing society the gift of his Limud Torah.

    in reply to: Seminary / Yeshiva in Israel – Economic Crisis #639078
    Joseph
    Participant

    “for the first time in two years i disagree with joseph.”

    I do allow, in my graciousness, one disagreement per year, per person. So Feivel, you’re still good, and still even have one extra-credit carried over from last year when you never disagreed with me. 🙂 But in all seriousness, I do appreciate your strong vote of confidence.

    My question above, indeed was too strong, and I made an incorrect point that there is never a benefit. In fact it is beneficial for the right girls, as you well said Eretz Yisroel is inherently kodosh right in the very air that is breathed in the holy land.

    My concern is, as myshadow and others above have pointed out, the inherent dangers for the wrong person to be sent there without the proper supervision. Too many go there, it seems to me, for fun and games and not for the kedusha. This can, and is, detrimental to the neshomo. Additionally, (and the financial cost of going is a factor) the benefit going to EY is usually far greater spiritually for boys (that it is appropriate for) that go to learn Torah in EY, than for girls. This point I’ve heard from those far greater than I, and is not my own chiddush.

    in reply to: Is a Boy Looking to Date a Girl or a Chavrusah? #1217989
    Joseph
    Participant

    The missing component here is Bitachon and Emunah in the Bashefer.

    in reply to: Talking With Members of The Opposite Gender #663033
    Joseph
    Participant

    anon,

    Because it says in the Igros Moshe (Choshem Mishpat volume 2, siman 32,

    sub heading 9 ?) that it is assur to shake a woman’s hand. (It also says in the IM it is prohibited to chat with women, like ujm provided the mekor yesterday.)

    in reply to: Why Do You Come To The CR? #993510
    Joseph
    Participant

    coke, you mean he likes himself?

    in reply to: Screen Names #1175674
    Joseph
    Participant

    coke not pepsi, why did you choose that sn?

    in reply to: Seminary / Yeshiva in Israel – Economic Crisis #639048
    Joseph
    Participant

    What conceivable Torah benefit is there to send a girl to seminary in Israel?

    in reply to: Amateur Radio #888626
    Joseph
    Participant

    Jothar, you’re thinking of CB radio (ala squeak) and truckers. Ham is a completely different animal. It is techie stuff. (And you can communicate from N.Y. to Australia with it.)

    in reply to: BRAINSTORM! #645472
    Joseph
    Participant

    ICOT:

    Any updates on our Dina D’malchusa Dina shaila?

    It’s only been 8 months…

    😉

    in reply to: A Humorous Item #1172491
    Joseph
    Participant

    in reply to: BRAINSTORM! #645468
    Joseph
    Participant

    start a thread, and find out.

    in reply to: Good Forwards (Emails) #1058972
    Joseph
    Participant

    an open book – a bored mod, perhaps?

    in reply to: Coca-Cola Classic and Yiddishkeit #640829
    Joseph
    Participant

    Yasher Koach JayMatt for standing up for the Kavod of the Torah Hakedosha.

    in reply to: Teens Talking on Cell Phones in the Street #947349
    Joseph
    Participant

    If something is loud and attention drawing, it lacks tznius.

    in reply to: Why Do You Come To The CR? #993479
    Joseph
    Participant

    squeak, why only #4?

    You missed your promised Chanukah Party attendance, hence I expect to see you by my Purim Seuda.

    in reply to: Coca-Cola Classic and Yiddishkeit #640802
    Joseph
    Participant

    asdf, subscribe to any numismatics periodical?

    in reply to: Coca-Cola Classic and Yiddishkeit #640800
    Joseph
    Participant

    asdfghjkl, I collect U.S. coins too!

    in reply to: Screen Names #1175639
    Joseph
    Participant

    Jothar?

    in reply to: “Free” Night in the Ramada New Yorker (only pay taxes) #639574
    Joseph
    Participant

    39, did you find this on FatWallet?

    in reply to: Screen Names #1175638
    Joseph
    Participant

    squeak… care to explain?

    in reply to: POLL: The Big Event Concert; Big Flop? Or Best Show? #640178
    Joseph
    Participant

    goody613, Rav Schorr Shlita is a Tzaddik and Talmid Chochom.

    in reply to: Chess Match – squeak vs SJSinNYC #1187027
    Joseph
    Participant

    beacon – if you draw the scrabble board.

    in reply to: Teens Talking on Cell Phones in the Street #947334
    Joseph
    Participant

    anonymrs, both are inappropriate (loud talking on the street), yet its worse by a girl for tznius purposes.

    in reply to: Is a Boy Looking to Date a Girl or a Chavrusah? #1217947
    Joseph
    Participant

    …to learn with. And a girl to marry.

    in reply to: Screen Names #1175635
    Joseph
    Participant

    A birth name needs explaining? Its the Anglicized version of my name, although I go by the Jewish version irl. I chose it as a username/login, hence the url.

    in reply to: Coca-Cola Classic and Yiddishkeit #640798
    Joseph
    Participant

    SJS, The Gedolim don’t need us as much as we need them. They are Gedolim whether everyone or no one follows them. They are G-d’s messenger’s on Earth.

    in reply to: Coca-Cola Classic and Yiddishkeit #640797
    Joseph
    Participant

    asdf, I’ve collected postage stamps (Philately) since 9 years old (and still do)!!

    in reply to: Cholov Akum #772677
    Joseph
    Participant

    I’m lactose intolerant.

    You must be Ashkenazi. 😛

    in reply to: Funny Shidduch Stories #1226409
    Joseph
    Participant

    like the Chasidim.

Viewing 50 posts - 1,301 through 1,350 (of 3,685 total)