NOYB

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 120 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Matzav Inbox: A Nation in Deep Crisis #2553834
    NOYB
    Participant

    Sure, we have some problems, but overall in real life things are fine. Get off the internet, talk to people (Magazines are not real life either). You’ll see everyone has some issues but most people are dealing with it, you will be fine if you just touch grass.

    in reply to: Matzav Inbox: What Is Going On With These Weddings? #2545152
    NOYB
    Participant

    @nevuah
    “They _can_ be giving alot of ztedakah and flaunting their wealth in other people’s faces”

    I don’t think it is flaunting in people’s faces, I think they are spending an appropriate amount given where they are. Why isn’t it flaunting to give millions to tzedakah? It’s appropriate to give a lot there, and appropriate to spend a lot on a wedding

    “They can be helping the yeshivos and making the little guys life harder because they are raising the bar.”
    If someone feels that the bar is raised because of an event made by someone with 20x the income they have, that is a falsehood that is their own issue to work on. Everyone’s life is different, so you can’t look at someone else and say “I have to do what he does”. Everyone should do what they can, and know that life’s unique circumstances mean they will have advantages and disadvantages others don’t have. The smart guy might be jealous of the athletic guy’s abilities, and the athletic guy wishes he could think as deeply as the smart guy. None of these people raise the bar for anyone else. The existence of Einstein and Usain Bolt does not mean the bar is to be as smart as Einstein and run 30 MPH.

    As an aside- Somehow people never feel that the bar was raised in term of how much they need to help the tzibbur, how much time they need to spend doing chessed, how much of their free time they can devote to learning, etc. It’s only raised for the fun stuff.

    As far as not everyone being equal, I don’t think it is possible to set a fair standard (I don’t think we should try, but even if we did). If the concern is raising the bar and making people feel bad they can’t do as much as you, then the only logically consistent place to set the bar is the poorest person in the community. Otherwise, you are still looking ostentatious to someone. Even then- one person likes flowers, so to them spending less on the food and more on the flowers is normal, but a different guy thinks they’re spending an unreasonable amount on flowers, and it goes on and on.

    I can’t speak to the social hierarchy of rich people, but every group has show offs, so I’m sure some are just showing off, which is definitely wrong.

    “But still even a rich guy can know what’s a normal amount of money to spend and what’s not. Most rich folk today was born with brains”
    I agree. my argument is that he knows what’s normal for him, and we need to accept that normal for him is a lot to us. Normal is too subjective here to be a usable standard.


    @HaLeiVi

    “Was Avraham Avinu expected to give away his whole wealth?”
    No, hence the limit of not giving more than a Chomesh to Tzedakah. My whole opinion is “do the right thing with the portion Hashem tells you what to do with. After that, it’s the same as anything else- it’s your business, or the business of whatever relevant family/friends and rav you decide to involve”

    “Do we at all ask this question about people who save up and never use it even for themselves?” They aren’t as obvious and therefore not as frequently discussed. If they are doing the right thing with the tzedakah portion (maaser vs a chomesh is a question for their rav), then my opinion remains the same- do what you want with the rest. If a $50 million savings account is what you want, go for it.

    “Could it be that this great advice we have, for where the rich people are supposed to put their money, can perhaps stem from say, jealousy?”
    Almost certainly it does. Which is why I’m saying people can do what they want (within halacha/hashkafah as determined by them and their daas torah) and we don’t get to try to limit them.

    “It’s also not a greatness to bash “the frum” as being obsessed eith gashmius. ”
    Agreed, and at no point did I do that.

    I think we generally agree, people enjoy different things, and there is no problem with them enjoying the money Hashem gave them (minus the part he told them to give away). I wasn’t saying they should give everything away. I spoke a lot about tzedakah to highlight the hypocrisy of benefiting from people spend big on tzedakah then kvetching about how those same people spend the rest of their money. I was once told when discussing this very issue that a rich person is basically Hashem’s investment banker- their job is to invest the money he gave them in the right places. The nature of the job is that if done properly, a good percentage of the money people give you becomes your salary and you get to enjoy it, but if you choose to use all the money you get for your own enjoyment instead of investing then you go to jail for fraud.


    @Always_Ask_Questions

    One of my main points is that the spending is not silly or questionable judgment at all, it makes perfect sense given the things they are used to and their level of income. As for giving the money to the right places- Even assuming the spending on weddings, etc. is foolish, given how many wonderful organizations and institutions there are, and all the things they are able to do, it seems at least most of it gets to the right places.

    in reply to: Matzav Inbox: What Is Going On With These Weddings? #2544463
    NOYB
    Participant

    I think there are a few very significant aspects to this that most people overlook. I’m only talking here about people who can actually afford this sort of thing, people doing it on credit to keep up with appearances are another story entirely.

    The more money you’re used to seeing (in business or personal life), the higher the amount that seems normal to you. $1 was a lot to us when we were kids, I would assume $100 is not a meaningless amount to most of us now, and Bill Gates loses money if he stops working to pick up that same $100. A $200,000 chassunah for someone who makes $2 million a year is the same percentage of income as a $20,000 takanah chassunah to someone making $200,000. When someone who can afford it makes a giant production, it is not as big a deal to them as we think it is. It’s a much bigger deal for a normal guy to make a $50k wedding than it is for a rich guy to make a $500k wedding. The world is a different place to different people. If someone’s job involves regularly signing deals for tens of millions, then a few hundred thousand is just not as big a deal to them anymore. If your job is to spend your day hopping between offices of the top 10 lawyers in Manhattan, after a while a lot of luxuries become normal. To make a wedding that is considered tastefully nice for this kind of person is a wedding that is crazy for most others, because those others aren’t regularly turning down a $1,000,000 business deal as too small. I absolutely will tell you it’s for the simcha, because we just don’t know what is normal to other people. Yeah, a $20,000 custom suit for a wedding is crazy. Until you realize this person spent the last 20 years in rooms with people wearing custom suits witha price of $50,000.

    Additionally, the entire tachlis of Hashem giving people a lot of money (as far as I’ve been told) is for tzedakah and chessed. The gvirim of klal yisroel rise to this occasion to an incredible degree. They’re supporting more yeshivos and people learning than any time in history since maamad har sinai. Hatzalah takes in millions just in the funds they match for the yearly campaigns. Chai Lifeline, RCCS, tomchei shabbos, I don’t have the days it would take to list all the good done in klal yisroel largely enabled by the funding of our “moguls”. These are people who fund half the chassunos in Eretz Yisroel and don’t blink. We’ll happily demand they fund whatever we need in our lives, and they do, and we have the chutzpah to turn around and say they can’t enjoy themselves with the rest of the money they make because we can’t control our kinah?

    “Hundreds of thousands of dollars. Gone. For a few hours of noise and lights and fake “wow.”
    And let’s call it what it is—it’s sick. Sick. Sick.

    This is again a kind of person who is living in a different world than you and me. For most of us, making in a good year in the low 6 figures, that would indeed be sick. But I guarantee you 90%+ of the people making a chasunah nice enough for you to notice are giving away tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars a night just to mishulachim, not to mention organizations. I would think very few people have made a chasunah with Motty Steinmetz and not given out more to tzedakah at that wedding than the cost of the wedding. We can’t imagine the tzedakah going on in the world. How many chassunos has a guy we’re all complaining about made for other people? How many organizations are able to go make “a few hours of noise and lights and fake “wow”” for sick kids in hospitals because of this kind of guy? We can’t tell someone who’s giving a chomesh+ on a large salary (not to mention investments) that he can’t make a wedding for his kid at a level he will thoroughly enjoy and he can easily afford.

    “And all this is happening while people in our community are choking on tuition bills,
    juggling credit cards, figuring out how to pay rent, how to marry off children, how to survive.”

    And do you know why there is still a yeshiva to send high tuition bills despite the small number of people paying full tuition, and why the struggling person in our community is still able to keep up the juggling act with the credit cards? Because the mogul we are demanding cut his spending is personally making up the gap in the yeshiva budget between what they need and what tuition brings in. Because the person we’re angry at for how much they spent on food at their chassunah matched every donation given to tomchei shabbos for the last 5 years. It’s very sad that people have monetary difficulties, just like it is sad that people have other difficulties. But I don’t demand everyone over 60 wears hearing aids just because many people need them.

    “There’s no limit anymore. No sense of normal. No sense of “this is enough.””

    I agree, everyone should be completely normal. When people knock on a rich guy’s door, he should give them an $18 check. He should give $360 to his kid’s yeshiva campaign, a few bucks here and there to large organizations, and that’s it. Oh, there is a crisis in the community and we need to make an organization to deal with it? Well, you better not ask mr. normal for any unusual donation, and you better come to his house during normal hours where you wouldn’t feel bad knocking on anyone else’s door. Oh, the gedolim need money to keep their mosdos open b/c the government cut off funding? Well, I hope they convince the knesset to restore funding, because no one would expect a group of normal guys who know when enough is enough to rally together and raise literally $100 million dollars in what, a week? When people live lives that naturally have high limits, and step up to fulfill the limitless demands we make of them, we can’t then go slap limits on the things that they enjoy.

    “The pressure this creates is unbelievable.
    More debt. More stress.”

    Pressure this creates? Taking on debt to make events like this? That’s insanity on the part of people feeling pressure. Usain bolt can run almost 28 MPH, are you feeling pressure to keep up? Saudi Sheikhs drive gold Lamborghinis, are you trying to apply for a car loan for one? In all the classic shtetl stories, not even in Chelm would the wagon driver or grocery store owner feel pressure to make a chassunah as big as the gvir. That’s not who you are. That’s not what you should do.

    There are definitely problems here. Some people are doing it just to show off. I happen to think it is not a lot of people, but that is definitely a terrible way to be. A WhatsApp status dedicated solely to tracking weddings made by “moguls” is absolutely gross and sick. But that is a lack of maturity, a lack of tznius, and a problem with jealousy. As for comparisons, that is 100% a problem with attendees and not the people making events. Why are we content to sit by our friends’ weddings judging them? That says a lot more about the people doing the judging than the people making the wedding.

    Look, recreating seudas halivyasan early is not the way I personally would go for a wedding either, regardless of how financially feasible it was. But who gets to determine the max level that’s ok? There’s always someone who thinks it’s too much. Bottom line, if you must spend time looking at yenem, spend more time looking at how he funds the shul you go to, the sforim you learn there, the yeshiva that taught you how to learn them, and less time on what happens with the portion of hard earned money he doesn’t spend on everyone else.

    in reply to: Shatnez wool and linen the biblical reason for shatnez #2539664
    NOYB
    Participant

    I’m so glad to see the original post on this thread, I was just thinking to myself “I need more AI-generated nonsense in my life, especially pseudoscience combined with some kfira”

    in reply to: Chaveirim Damaged the Car, Whats the Right thing to do? #2532435
    NOYB
    Participant

    I’m a Chaveirim guy (not in Monsey), so here’s my perspective: If your car is kind of old, the wheel was likely rusted on to the rotor. Kicking the edge of it is a regular thing to do in this situation, as is hitting it with the spare tire and sometimes, if none of that works, with a hammer. I’ve occasionally had cases where the tire was so stuck on, we couldn’t get it off and the car had to be towed. Even without rust, wheels are sometimes hard to remove. Missing the tire happens to everyone occasionally, but denting the fender is pretty unusual. Either way, I wouldn’t call any of that supreme incompetence, unless there are more details we don’t know. As to what you should do, there’s a few angles:

    1. definitely say something to Chaveirim. They can try to figure out exactly how much of an incompetence vs accident this was. If it’s an incompetence or training issue, I guarantee they want to know about it. If it is just a thing that happens every once in a while, then there’s no harm in telling them.

    2. When it comes to asking for compensation, it may be worth looking at the whole story. Your 17 year old son called a volunteer organization for help changing a tire. Sure, it’s not always easy in practice, but almost anyone with a license should be able to do it. Someone who does not get paid for this took time out of his day, a week before pesach (so he’s either taking time out of his bein hazmanim, his work, or helping his family prepare for yom tov) to help your son. Even if you want to say the guy didn’t handle it the best, at the end of the day he was trying to help, not getting paid, and dealing with a situation that can sometimes be tricky (wheels do get stuck) in what sounds to me like a pretty normal way. The damage you described also sounds more cosmetic.

    Bottom line, you may still be fully within your rights to ask for compensation. After all, the guy did damage your car. But in this case, with the money coming from tzedakah, is it the erlich thing to do? I am biased, but I don’t think so. This is assuming that the damage is cosmetic and your son is physically capable of changing a tire, if those 2 assumptions are not true than things may be different.

    in reply to: Are we better than the Chofetz Chaim? – Saving Money #2511304
    NOYB
    Participant

    So your question is “Why must everyone copy everyone else?” and your solution is “Let’s all agree to copy everyone else but copy something different than we are copying now”? You don’t have to copy everyone else. go buy whatever hat you would like.

    in reply to: The Amazing Frum Community We Are Part Of #2449698
    NOYB
    Participant

    I think this is a wonderful idea!

    I have been a member of Chaveirim for many years. Every so often, someone will call on behalf of a non-jew, or a member will stop on the side of the road to help someone random. Very often, these people react with fear, because they are sure anyone stopping to help them is going to demand a large payment in return. They have never experienced chessed, which is such a regular part of all of our lives! I have had times where it takes me longer to explain that we just want to help people than it does to fix whatever their issue was.

    in reply to: Is Jewish Music “Jewish” Anymore? #2434805
    NOYB
    Participant

    This has been the same complaint for at least hundreds of years. If a person thinks the Yiddishe music they’re listening to is unique and has no relation to goyish music, that usually means they are not familiar with the goyish music that the Yiddishe music is similar to. Sfardi music sounds like Arab music. Chassidishe nigunim sound like military marches and other music popular in the countries and times they are from, and some are even exact copies sung vocally instead of being played on instruments (I once heard someone sing Shalom Aleichem to the tune of Beethoven’s Fur Elise, he swore it was a nigun from I think Belz?). Chazzanus is literally just opera music.

    This is not to say that we should freely be listening to goyish music. The above listed styles are currently and were in the past similar to the goyish style, but missing a lot of the negatives. For example, the DJ style music that sounds “no different than what non Jews would listen to” in fact has major differences. Our music has no pritzus, no nivul peh, and is composed of quotes from the torah or chazal. Our music is (mostly) played at events conducted in accordance with halacha.

    It is also important to point out that different music is meant for different crowds. If you feel an event/song/singer is too close to the goyish style for you, keep in mind it is likely meant for people who would otherwise be engaging with the FAR worse goyish version.

    in reply to: Non-typical Wedding Ideas #2036760
    NOYB
    Participant

    You can check AirBnB or VRBO

    in reply to: Operation Paperclip #2035623
    NOYB
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer- given the bombing accuracy of the time (dump thousands of tons of bombs in a several mile radius and hopefully hit a factory that’s a mile wide) any attempt to bomb the tracks would be more likely to kill everyone in Auschwitz. Not to mention, let’s say they hit the tracks. All that means is they force the yidden in the camp to work 24/7 to fix the tracks, which wouldn’t take that long. so what exactly would that accomplish?

    not to mention, what shaychis does bombing the tracks have with operation paperclip

    in reply to: Should Rittenhouse have been there. #2033062
    NOYB
    Participant

    NoMesorah- You are certainly correct that if the goal was survival, staying home was the best bet, and concealed carry was the 2nd best option. However, the point was to protect and clean up businesses, while providing a back up plan for survival if that became necessary, which it did.

    I don’t really understand what you mean by “You have to commit to use the gun or call it off”
    running away with a gun is absolutely a valid tactic. people spend a lot of time practicing tactical retreats/withdrawals, leapfrogging when backup is available, etc.

    You don’t always shoot to kill, you shoot to stop the threat- for the first two, they stopped when they died. the third guy stopped after he was shot in the arm. Killing him at that point would be murder, because there is no reason to keep shooting if he’s no longer a threat.

    What would be accomplished by dropping the gun or holding it by the muzzle? I highly doubt that people would have stopped chasing him, as mobs are not known for their rational decision-making abilities. There is no rule that you have to kill anyone you are forced to shoot, and there is no rule governing the speed at which you retreat in a fight (other than “as fast as is prudent”). he wasn’t pointing the rifle over his shoulder and cranking off rounds, he was running away, and then shot when he was knocked to the ground from behind and beaten. The prudent decision was to get away ASAP from the murderous mob that just tried to kill him 3 times.

    “One can try to calmly back away with a drawn gun. But do not make a break for it.”

    Why not? wouldn’t you want to get away from the people who tried to take your gun and then kill you with theirs as fast as possible? what would be the reason to go slow?

    in reply to: Should Rittenhouse have been there. #2032870
    NOYB
    Participant

    NoMesorah- you seem to be lacking some information, as you said you’re relying on a lot of hearsay, so allow me to fill you in.

    First, let’s get a few things out of the way- Kyle was an idiot for being there, and his mother was a bigger idiot for letting him be there. However, I do not think we can say that a molester who got out of the mental hospital that morning (the first guy Kyle Shot, Joseph Rosenbaum) is totally innocent and would never have attacked Kyle if he didn’t have a rifle. Also, Kyle’s AR-15 is not an Assault Rifle. Assault rifles are specifically select-fire military rifles with intermediate cartridges. Kyle’s AR-15 is semi-automatic only, and was never used by the US military.

    He shouldn’t have been there at all, but once he was, it was completely reasonable to bring protection. Doesn’t mean he was totally super pumped to shoot someone, doesn’t mean he thought he was in the army, it means he wanted to go help the community his father lived in and he knew it could be dangerous, so he wanted to be able to protect himself. Once he was there, good idea or not, when people attack you and try to take your weapon it is reasonable, as the court ruled, to defend yourself.

    As someone who has been training with guns since he was 10 years old, I can tell you that Kyle did an excellent job of defending himself with his weapon. He didn’t fire any accidental rounds, didn’t fire until his life was being threatened, didn’t hit anyone who wasn’t trying to kill him first despite being in a crowded street, did all that while under massive pressure and despite being hit in the head with a skateboard and falling down. He lowered his rifle when the third guy seemed to be walking away, and only shot him when the third guy pointed his gun at him. he also fired only until the threat stopped, and didn’t just keep shooting. All in all, this is very very impressive.

    In court, there were a couple of essential things that came out- 1. All 3 of the people Kyle shot started up with him, while he was trying to get away from them. as I said before, he even lowered his gun when rioter #3 was backing away from him, and only fired when rioter #3 pointed his gun at kyle. 2. He was legally allowed to be where he was, with his gun.

    All in all, I don’t really understand your point. you say that “If you have a rifle, you use it or put it away. I�m not sure what he actually did, but he clearly lacked training or courage. Probably both.” Kyle did exactly what you said he should. he used his rifle when he was forced to to protect his own life, then slung it over his shoulder to “put it away” when he was close enough to police to stay safe. He acted courageously by not panicking, and I don’t know what sort of training he had, but he handled the situation as well as anyone possibly could have.

    in reply to: Macha against men not giving gittin #2013710
    NOYB
    Participant

    Yiddishkeit is not twitter, we don’t cancel people. Even in the 1 case where a beis din told people to go protest, the people went on to go after the guy’s family and their jobs, which is 1000% ossur. Are you a scumbag piece of garbage if you abuse halacha to hold someone in a marriage? for sure! But chukas hagoyim in the worst possible way is not a good method of getting people to listen to halacha. That guy from Afghanistan gave a get after 20 years b/c he was afraid of ISIS, should we start handing people to ISIS for not giving a get?

    Not to mention all these major “yorei shomayim” and “shluchei beis din” who spend their days on social media yelling about this stuff, and give interviews to the most disgusting, animalistic news outlets telling loshon hora on yidden to the lowest class of goyim around.

    Does any of this seem like something torahdig? Do pictures of these protests look like an event the Chofetz Chaim and R’ Moshe would be seen at, or an event AOC would be at? Do they look like birchas Kohanim by the kosel, chavrusah tumult in BMG, or the women’s march in DC? Do the announcements to go sound more like the invitations to the siyum hashas or an antifa protest?

    in reply to: Get Refusal- Family Involvement #1962084
    NOYB
    Participant

    It’s almost like adopting twitter tactics and turning the job of shluchei beis din and talmidei chachomim over to a bunch of lo yutzlachs who have no respect for halacha anyway was a bad idea that has and will lead to more chillul hashem and lynch mobs. Look at a picture of these get protests. do the people there look like yorei shomayim who mamesh feel for these poor women and are standing up for the kovod of beis din? Not in any of the pictures I’ve seen.

    in reply to: Get Refusal #1957729
    NOYB
    Participant

    regardless of who is or isn’t a “get refuser”- can anyone possibly think of a worse thing to encourage than “hey random people, form a mob and go ruin someone’s life based on hearsay”? This is very quickly going to turn into a nightmare, with the worst forms of loshon hara, and I have no doubt that countless innocent people are going to have their lives ruined over this.

    in reply to: Those guilty in SNL bloodlibel “joke” #1950959
    NOYB
    Participant

    I don’t understand the outrage about this joke. SNL thrives on making edgy jokes. This same comedy set had a joke about the new mars rover running a white supremacist twitter account, cuomo covering up nursing home deaths, and inappropriate conduct by catholic priests. It is highly unlikely that Michael Che made this particular joke because he really hates Jews or anything like that.

    in reply to: Twitter Bans Zelenko – He Should Switch To Parler #1931721
    NOYB
    Participant

    Parler is designed to be a version of twitter with free speech for all (as long as they are not directly threatening violence). Yes, free speech means disgusting people are allowed to say nasty things we disagree with. that will include anti-semitism and holocust denial. It also means you will be allowed to say all of the various things we believe as yidden that would have the types of people who like twitter accuse us of baing nazi facist haters.

    in reply to: Student Loan Forgiveness #1929277
    NOYB
    Participant

    The government created the problem as a whole, but the truth remains that the people who borrowed money individually have to return the money they promised to return. This isn’t going to return anything to the economy, because most people with productive jobs are already paying off their loans and are also spending money already. The people with no money to pay their loans got there because of bad financial decisions, and that won’t change if we forgive their loans.

    in reply to: Kashering A Laptop. #1902304
    NOYB
    Participant

    Remove the WiFi and bluetooth cards and Ethernet port. Any form of filter or digital block can be broken.

    in reply to: Filters Iphone 11 #1898066
    NOYB
    Participant

    if you have an iPhone, consider using th native restrictions. they work pretty well for most uses

    in reply to: Jacob Blake #1895841
    NOYB
    Participant

    There is a police officer on youtube, MikeTheCop, who said that Blake was known to local police to carry a gun in his car, told them at that time he had a gun in his car, was holding a knife, and had an active warrant for assault and domestic abuse.

    in reply to: What kind of police reforms do we need? #1886176
    NOYB
    Participant

    “body cameras should be on all the time without control of the wearers” Forget bathroom breaks. What about an officer texting a spouse? Talking to a confidential informant? Talking to a victim of a horrible crime who is terribly traumatized and doesn’t want their face plastered across the internet? Not to mention that body cams overwrite the footage they have every 30 min. because they just don’t have much storage. Suggesting that such footage be saved forever or uploaded to the cloud instantly is so financially and technically laughable it is not even a serious proposal.

    What reforms do police need?

    Before you even talk about it, if you are not committed to making their job easier in any way you can, and tackling crime by negating the causes of it, don’t even talk about changing policing or the police in general. If you want to make certain parts of policing more stringent, you need to make some parts of their job easier too.

    I think there are a lot of things police departments can do better. However, I want to point out that a lot of our community (and the whole country) falls into 2 camps.

    Camp 1- police officers are the bravest, best people ever. Litteral malachim who can do no wrong (I might say they theoretically can do wrong, but good luck finding a case that happened outside of an hour before shabbos where I thought the cops were wrong)

    Camp 2- I got a ticket once, or a cop was mean to me, and therefore I am to the far left of BLM, and I hold all cops are Nazis.

    We need to realize that police are just people who do a job that while scary, is not actually that dangerous relative to most jobs people hold (farming, roofing, and trucking are all kill more people every year). There are a lot of things (using qualified immunity, using civil asset forfeiture, de-escalation tactics, general community relations) that the police need to do a MUCH better job of. That being said, most police officers are wonderful people, not racist or anti-Semitic, and do a job which is lemaisa dangerous and scary, for little pay and horrific side effects. They keep us safe, and for that, they deserve hakoras hatov. But they are not perfectly good or perfectly bad.

    in reply to: Why does the government give benefits to kollel yungerleit? #1885259
    NOYB
    Participant

    There are many aspects to this question, depending on how you approach it. From a small government/conservative side, the government should not fund people who are intentionally poor. the idea of welfare should be to help people get back on their feet. Now, you might say funding education is a good idea, and it is, but this education does not contribute to the things that national policymakers consider valuable.

    That being said, we are yidden, not secular policymakers or small government advocates. If benefits will be distributed, then an exclusively peaceful nation of scholars that produces people who do contribute a lot to the nation physically (not usually while in kollel, but afterwards) and by and large pays taxes should definitely be on the list to receive benefits. From a yiddishe perspective, the world runs on Torah, and while some may not appreciate this, it is obvious to us that yungerleit learning in kollel are of immeasurable benefit to this country.

    in reply to: Socialism OTD #1884476
    NOYB
    Participant

    Socialism didn’t cause people to go OTD. People were losing their grip on Hashem for various reasons, and socialism was a new, attractive Ideology that was sweeping people up all over Europe.

    in reply to: Freedom of Speech #1882307
    NOYB
    Participant

    Yes. A swastika is davka freedom of speech. You don’t need a law protecting the right to say “good morning”. You need a law to protect speech people don’t like. People have the right to display a swastika, and I have a right to tell everyone what a disgusting racist they are and how we should all boycott any business they have or ask a nazi’s employer if that’s really who they want representing their company. We can’t just outlaw things that make us uncomfortable, even if we are uncomfortable for a good reason. We have to allow people to express their ideas, and then react appropriately.

    in reply to: Do our eyes tell us what happened to GEORGE FLOYD #1881343
    NOYB
    Participant

    George Floyd was not strangled. While kneeling on someone’s neck can cause asphyxiation and loss of blood flow to the brain, Floyd died from a combination of intoxicants in his system and underlying health conditions exacerbated by having the cops kneeling on his neck (aka he had a heart condition and being high and extreme stress plus a heavy weight pushing on you is not great for your health normally, let alone if you have a heart condition).

    in reply to: Is EMP Strike Imminent? #1875904
    NOYB
    Participant

    North Korea and Iran don’t have NEARLY the capability to launch an EMP Strike against the US. F-14s and Mig 17s from 1/2-3/4 of a century ago are not going to get through NORAD, or even get close enough to the US to be under the jurisdiction of NORAD. Honestly, I don’t know that China has capability to deliver an EMP to the US either. The US has not prepared for a domestic war against those countries, it has prepared for “if they get annoying enough, what’s the easiest way to invade and destroy them”.

    A single EMP strike would not take out the entire country. US domestic nuclear launch facilities are hardened against EMPs, as is a large area underneath the Pentagon, Air Force 1, The White House, and many other command and control locations, not to mention the multiple nuclear-capable carrier strike groups we have at sea pretty much constantly since the aircraft carrier was invented. While we can’t know for sure, it is INCREDIBLY likely that there is some sort of protocol for nuclear subs to launch if they don’t hear anything from their commanders after a certain amount of time. Not to mention US forces and diplomats all across the world, as well as the aforementioned EMP-hardened parts of the US military command and control. As I said before, I don’t know where you are getting your info, but I suggest not following that source and taking a chill pill.

    in reply to: Is EMP Strike Imminent? #1875379
    NOYB
    Participant

    I don’t know where you are getting these “talks and warnings” from, but I suggest you stop taking information from that source. China is not going to start a war with the US, because without us their country will collapse, not to mention that we would very likely win a war against them. No one is looking to start World War 3, especially in the current climate.

    It is patently ridiculous to imagine that the US government is totally cool with this impending strike, or can do nothing to avoid it, and is keeping us all at home to somehow prepare us for it. Even assuming that this was the case, how would a stay at home order be preparation for an EMP strike? Wouldn’t better preparation for a strike that would take out most of the US’s electrical devices be a summer full of outside work and play, which would make people better prepared to live without electricity?

    Are you possibly saying the Chinese released the virus to keep us at home as preparation? Why would they want to prepare us at all?

    While an EMP bomb is a legitimate tactic that might be used in warfare (although it is tantamount to a nuclear strike, and the most effective EMP weapons are in fact nuclear), I don’t know what you mean by “attack on the electrical grid by overpowering it”. An electromagnetic pulse is simply a pulse of electromagnetic energy that causes a massive power surge, destroying all electronics, not just those hooked up to the grid. EMPs can be naturally produced, or manually produced.

    in reply to: Atlanta #1874782
    NOYB
    Participant

    To add to Som1’s post- aside from the low likelihood of hitting someone’s leg, legs have veins and arteries that can easily be fatal if hit. For these two reasons, anyone who expects to be in any sort of self defense situation is trained to avoid attempting leg shots.

    in reply to: Atlanta #1874522
    NOYB
    Participant

    This guy was driving drunk, fought the police, stole one of their weapons, and tried to use it on them. the orientation of his body as he shot a stolen taser at a police officer is completely irrelevant. Even if he had just grabbed the taser and run, and they shot him in the back, it would STILL be ok! The supreme court ruled in Tenessee v. Garner that if the police think someone poses a threat to the public they can use appropriate force to prevent that person’s escape. A drunk child abuser who fought the cops and was running away with a stolen taser is certainly a threat. I don’t care if he was a yid, a goy, or a purple octopus- if you drive drunk, fight the police, and attempt to shoot them with a weapon you stole from them, you are going to get shot.

    The DA absolutely DOES NOT have any more evidence than we do- vha raya the Georgia Bureau of Investigation said they hadn’t given him any evidence or finished their investigation when the DA decided to charge the officers. Also, there is no “more evidence” that makes it ok to drive drunk, fight police, steal one of their tasers, and attempt to shoot them with it, all of which has been proven on multiple publicly accessible videos. The DA is under investigation for corruption and me too-related charges, and is currently losing in an election, so I think we all know why these officers were charged. Aside from being a terrible person, the DA said that one of the officers had agreed to turn state’s witness against the other, which was a lie, and just two weeks ago said a taser was a deadly weapon (when he was trying to punish police for using it) and is now saying it wasn’t, because he wants to get police in trouble.

    The police in Atlanta didn’t walk out because they were mad (although they certainly are). They walked out because one of their colleagues was just tried with murder for following the procedure they were trained on and using deadly force on a suspect who was attempting to tase him. This makes it unsafe for them to do their job. Imagine if your boss at a restaurant told you that you should make a sandwich a certain way, then charged you $10,000 because a restaurant reviewer didn’t like the sandwich. Would you stay, and risk another $10,000 fine every time you made a sandwich the way you were trained, or would you leave because you don’t want to risk it? Police don’t wnat to work in a job where they either have to accept anything a criminal does to them, or risk jail time if they respond in any way, even if their response is proper.

    in reply to: Post Corona: The New Frum Community #1862462
    NOYB
    Participant

    Why re-invent the wheel? There are numerous communities across the US with all the small town meilos you listed. Baltimore, Silver Spring, Dallas, Las Vegas, Atlanta, Phoenix, Richmond, South Bend, and Norfolk are only some of the places that come to mind. These places already have a lot of frum infrastructure, like shulls, schools, and kosher food.

    in reply to: what will post covid-19 look like? #1856967
    NOYB
    Participant

    I think the first shabbos back will be bittersweet. While I think everyone will be happy to be back in shul, I imagine there will still be some measures in place. It is not unlikely that the first while back in shul will require masks and social distancing, and I can’t imagine anyone will be allowed to have a kiddush. Remember, this thing will end in steps, not suddenly.

    in reply to: Chinese Lab Origination of Wuhan Coronavirus #1856588
    NOYB
    Participant

    I can’t speak to number 2 or 3 (I believe it was probably number 2 though), but I think that we can definitively rule out that this was an intentionally released bioweapon. Firstly, scientists can tell when a virus is natural or artificial. Everyone has been saying that this virus looks natural. Secondly, this is a relatively benign virus. It spreads well, but the death rate is very low. If it were an intentionally created bio-weapon, it would be killing a lot more people. No one wants to invent an artillery shell that covers a very small area when it explodes, and no one wants to create a virus that barely kills anyone (compared to things like anthrax and the black death).

    in reply to: A Possible Explanation #1853391
    NOYB
    Participant

    How about this: we don’t know, and we can’t know, so let’s stop with the crazy explanations, especially when they slander the victims like this. Just have emunah that this is all for the best, like everything else, and move on!

    in reply to: Minyan #1844462
    NOYB
    Participant

    JUST STAY HOME!!!! You are not smarter than the rabbonim. You are not smarter than the ER doctors. You are not smarter than the epidemiologists. Everyone who knows anything about both the medical and halachic side of things is telling you to stay home and daven alone. Stop trying to be a tzaddik. There is no mitzvah to increase the chances of people dying because you decided to ignore every rav and doctor. Israel said that 25% of cases were from shuls and minyanim. Are you willing to get 2 or 3 people sick per minyan while going against piskei halacha and medical advice? Your first sentence was correct: CLEARLY THE RIGHT THING TO DO IS NOT TO DAVEN WITH A MINYAN. The more “safe” minyanim you make, the more “safe” minyanim there will have to be as more people die and more people need to say kaddish for them.

    in reply to: What programming language is better to start learning? #1831298
    NOYB
    Participant

    It depends on what you want to do. Python is great for scripting. Many companies prefer Java or C++ for more detailed development. Don’t look for anonymous answers on YW, go to linkedin and look for professionals who can give you actual advice and help you figure out what you want to do and how.

    in reply to: Why is the Wider Frum Public Making a Big Deal Over Bryant’s Death #1826634
    NOYB
    Participant

    1. Basketball is basically the most popular sport in yeshiva. A lot of people follow it, so they know about Koby Bryant.

    2. He was extremely famous, so even if you and no one you know followed basketball (very unlikely in a vast majority of yeshivos) you probably heard of him at least a little.

    3. Helicopter crashes are big news.

    4. He was young, his daughter was obviously also very young, and 6 or 7 other people died. It’s very sad.

    5. It’s getting wall to wall coverage in the goyish media. Even if you don’t follow sports or care about celebrities, if something is being covered by literally every outlet all day, you will most likely hear about it.

    in reply to: gun control #1818195
    NOYB
    Participant

    Gun control has not and will not work. You don’t have to like guns, but do you trust people like “no bail” Deblasio to protect you? Is training important? Yes, of course. However, look around a vast majority of places with gun control. People get attacked, and they can’t do anything. Guns are the great equalizer. The smallest, weakest person with a gun can defend themselves from the biggest thug who is trying to hurt them. All these attacks in NY- you think that people would randomly punch yidden if they knew they would be killed over it? The chapsem worked, and concealed carry works even better. Even if you don’t like guns, and don’t want one, you have no right to make it illegal for those who want to protect themselves or others.

    in reply to: $5,000.000 donated to Trump by Orthodox Jews, can we afford it? #1800280
    NOYB
    Participant

    “Do we have the luxury” No. “we” don’t. However, the people who donated do. There is no requirement that every penny of donated money goes to your preferred causes. Look at the names of people who attended. Guys like Ruby Schron give more tzedaka than we could imagine. It is none of our business how gvirim spend their money. They are giving plenty to tzedaka, and they can do whatever they want with the rest of their money.

    in reply to: Is it ‘un-manly’ to take kids to the park? #1770849
    NOYB
    Participant

    No, being a decent parent is not “unmanly”

    in reply to: Which way does Ywn lean? #1769782
    NOYB
    Participant

    Neither. I think they do a pretty good job of staying in the center, because I see people complaining they are too liberal and I also see people complaining they are too conservative. This leads me to think they are doing a good job of staying in the center. I see comments with different opinions, and articles with different biases.

    in reply to: Predictions for 2020 #1732895
    NOYB
    Participant

    I don’t think it is possible to make predictions so far from the election. Things change in a minute, and we never know what could happen in the next week, forget the next year.

    in reply to: I don’t understand outcome of Mueller report #1718400
    NOYB
    Participant

    There is a major legal machlokes over whether there can be obstruction of justice with no underlying crime. The tzad to say yes is that even if there is no crime, you still can’t mess with investigations. The tzad to say no is that if there is no crime, there is no justice to obstruct.

    in reply to: Wars every 28 years #1688184
    NOYB
    Participant

    What about Grenada, Nicaragua, the Russian invasion of Afghanistan, Serbia, and Somalia in the 80s and 90s?

    in reply to: Guns #1681291
    NOYB
    Participant

    I don’t think the problem is with the guns. First, let’s look at the actual numbers- out of the 30,000ish deaths annually involving guns, roughly 2/3 are suicides. That’s not a gun problem, it’s a suicide/mental health problem. People commit suicide in all kinds of ways, and no one is discussing banning bridges or razor blades, because we recognize that suicide, not the tool used, is the issue. Then, once you get around 10,000 murders with guns, realize that around 90% of that is gang murders. That’s not a gun problem, it’s a gang problem. Is 1,000 deaths really a national issue of horrific significance? Obviously, it’s not good- but it is overblown. Don’t join a gang or commit suicide, and you are more likely to die from flu or in some sort of accident. As for banning certain types of guns- all the guns I have heard proposals to ban function the same as any other gun. Additionally, good luck confiscating 300 million guns from 80-100 million Americans. Also, I don’t really understand how you can offer an opinion on this without knowing anything about it. You wouldn’t join a discussion about yeshivos if you didn’t know the difference between Beis Yaakov and BMG, so how can you join a discussion on guns without knowing anything about them? Luna- those “big guns” you talk about shoot at the exact same rate as pistols. Not to mention the fact that millions of people around the country depend on them for hunting and defending their farms from coyotes, groundhogs, and other pests. Also, rifles (the big guns) are used in around 1% of crimes committed with guns.

    in reply to: Greater danger to yeshivas being ignored #1669738
    NOYB
    Participant

    You find SUING to be a problem? If people were molested, let them sue the yeshiva, rebbi, and everyone involved out of existence.

    in reply to: Sephardim And Driving Nazi Cars #1669294
    NOYB
    Participant

    Again with this stupidity? None of these companies are even the same companies as they were during the war. They have all been bought and sold and reorganized a million times. The parts are made in China and final assembly is in Mexico. It’s one thing if you are a survivor who gets flashbacks if you see a symbol you saw in the camps or something, but if you just want to boycott everything made by someone who wronged the Jews, enjoy your cave on a desert Island.

    in reply to: Should schools have midwinter break #1668764
    NOYB
    Participant

    Absolutely not. Kids, unlike the rest of us, can work hard for months with no break. We should just make them sit in yeshiva for 8+ hours a day, with no breaks, ever. Kids in school for hours longer than their parents jobs, with no breaks, what could possibly go wrong? There is no way this will cause any bitterness or burnout.

    in reply to: Why do people get nervous when they fly? #1653324
    NOYB
    Participant

    Statistics, cars versus planes, none of this matters. No one is sitting down with a bunch of studies and making an educated choice to be afraid of small planes. People see news stories about crashes, look at a tiny little plane that is only powered by a propeller, and decide that flying around in this thing is not something they feel safe doing.

    in reply to: Corporal punishment must remain an option for teachers #1652712
    NOYB
    Participant

    1: people used to give birth at home without medical attention, and many turned out fine. Do you think we shouldn’t use doctors? We don’t live in the same world as we used to.

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 120 total)