Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ujmParticipant
Get a helicopter.
ujmParticipantGHadorah: What’s the difference whether the unborn child developed through an involuntary action or a party unknown? If killing an unborn child is an affront to G-d, certainly no less than thievery, idolatry, arson or manslaughter, then either scenario should be the same as far as it being impermissible.
modified
ujmParticipantAvira, I’ve long ago suggested to him that he do exactly that.
ujmParticipantGHadorah: You consider being a ski instructor or farming goats to be one of the shpitz highest attainable achievements one can reach in life?
Do these farm boys look for farm girl type shidduchim?
ujmParticipantShe has absolutely no right to kill herself. Even if she is not pregnant.
ujmParticipantcommonsaychel is the Official CR Troll Buster. His word is first, last and final.
Everyone is considered a troll until, and unless, commonsaychel gives a hechsher certifying you are not a troll.
ujmParticipantAvira, statistically, many more OOTers move In-Town than vice versa.
ujmParticipantWas there a time in history when people stopped dying?
ujmParticipantEver since the advent of “resumes” in shidduchim, a not-that-old phenomenon, girls have become like real estate to be traded and bandied about.
Time to get rid of the resumes.
ujmParticipantI keep meeting many many in-towners who have OOT personalities. Most of them have been lifetime in-towners coming from very in-town families.
ujmParticipantI know of many gemachs that give cash advance loans with 0% interest.
Mi K’amchu Yisroel.
ujmParticipantNo one’s trying to ban interracial marriages. Except, possibly, some quacks. No one serious. So stop with the fake scare tactics.
And if illegal aliens don’t get a free education after breaking into the country, then they’ll be less incentive to illegally enter the country. Sounds like a good idea.
ujmParticipantNo, they won’t reinstate Dred Scott. No need to engage in unrealistic scare tactics.
ujmParticipantI’m only interested in a bridge in Brooklyn.
ujmParticipantcommonsaychel issssssss a trolllllll. The biggest trollllllll of the coffee room EVER. SUCH A TROLL!!!!!
Trolley, Trollster, ________ (fill in the rest)
ujmParticipantAAQ: I specifically referred to American/Western culture. Even though too much of that Gentile weltanschauung has most unfortunately infiltrated even some quarters of ours, as you often demonstrate first hand, you are deliberately confusing the Kesuba into an American culture that has no bearing on the point.
ujmParticipantReb Shayala’s brother moved to New York. His Kever is in Staten Island.
ujmParticipantIf the author or publisher commissioned a crime to obtain this document, the author and/or publisher should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
ujmParticipant“Dear Ujm,
“must do her husband’s will” Please quote correctly.”
Dear N0mesorah,
Per your request, here’s the exact original:
וְכֵן צִוּוּ עַל הָאִשָּׁה שֶׁתִּהְיֶה מְכַבֶּדֶת אֶת בַּעְלָהּ בְּיוֹתֵר מִדַּאי וְיִהְיֶה עָלֶיהָ מוֹרָא מִמֶּנּוּ וְתַעֲשֶׂה כָּל מַעֲשֶׂיהָ עַל פִּיו. וְיִהְיֶה בְּעֵינֶיהָ כְּמוֹ שַׂר אוֹ מֶלֶךְ. מְהַלֶּכֶת בְּתַאֲוַת לִבּוֹ וּמַרְחֶקֶת כָּל מַה שֶּׁיִּשְׂנָא. וְזֶה דֶּרֶךְ בְּנוֹת יִשְׂרָאֵל וּבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל הַקְּדוֹשִׁים וְהַטְּהוֹרִים בְּזִוּוּגָן. וּבִדְרָכִים אֵלּוּ יִהְיֶה יִשּׁוּבָן נָאֶה וּמְשֻׁבָּח:
ujmParticipantAAQ: You’ll notice that when the King is sovereign, his wife is entitled Queen Consort. But when the Queen is sovereign, her husband is not entitled King Consort. This is because the title of King, by definition, outranks the title of Queen.
ujmParticipantAAQ: American/Western culture has absolutely zero to do with the Kesuba, Torah Judaism or with Klal Yisroel.
ujmParticipantUser176, what are you referring to?
ujmParticipantCoffee Addict: A Queen is not equal to the King. Similarly, the Halacha is that a wife must do her husband’s will, whereas the reverse is not the case.
ujmParticipantAAQ: Are you suggesting we learn from the interactions described by Chazal between the heilige Tanna Rabi Meir and his Rebbetzin Bruria?
ujmParticipantN0m: Halacha is cancelling them. Avira is merely explaining the Halacha.
ujmParticipantIn modern Western society, contaminated by feminism, it is deemed verboten to discuss men’s rights or women’s responsibilities. According to the powers that be in American culture, it is only permissible to discuss women’s rights and men’s responsibilities.
ujmParticipantBecause any threads outside of Decaffeinated doesn’t display on the main Coffee Room page.
ujmParticipantNow that Roe v. Wade is B”H about to fall into the dustbin of history, IY”H the newly constituted Supreme Court will soon overturn other despicable decisions such as Obergefell v. Hodges, Lawrence v. Texas, etc.
ujmParticipantIt took its course after having its day in the sun.
ujmParticipantStalin is the natural result of Marxism.
May 8, 2022 3:11 pm at 3:11 pm in reply to: Classics and Beyond Emor: Vort With A Mothers Day Twist #2084405ujmParticipantMother’s Day was enshrined into law by a Klu Klux Klan congressman.
ujmParticipantEvangelicals also have an affinity to Judaism.
ujmParticipantThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has held an intangible item, like information, can be a “thing of value” under 18 U.S.C. §1030, and since the Supreme Court is located within the District of Columbia Circuit, this would be a chargeable offense.
Additionally, 18 U.S.C. §1001 makes it a federal offense to knowingly and willfully make a materially false statement “in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative or judicial branch of the Government of the United States … ” The chief justice could ask all the law clerks, and anyone else who had access to Alito’s draft opinion (less than 50 people in total), to sign a statement saying that they were not the source of the leak. Assuming that they all sign the statement denying being the source of the leak, the chief justice could then ask law enforcement agents to interview each of those individuals. If the interview exposes the leaker, that individual could be prosecuted for having made a false statement in the declaration.
In 1919, the Department of Justice indicted Ashton Embry, Justice Joseph McKenna’s law clerk, for sharing the court’s decisions with Wall Street traders before the decisions were officially released.
Another possibility is prosecution for so-called honest services fraud. As the Congressional Research Service has said, Congress amended 18 U.S.C. §1346, “which defines the crimes of mail and wire fraud,” to make clear that this statute extends “to conduct that deprives a person or group of the right to have another act in accordance with some externally imposed duty or obligation, regardless of whether the victim so deprived has suffered or would suffer a pecuniary harm.”
Another remote possibility is prosecution under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986, which is codified at 18 U.S.C. §1030. The act makes it a crime “to access a computer with authorization and to use such access to obtain or alter information in the computer that the accesser is not entitled so to obtain or alter.”
ujmParticipantBored-Teen: Do you have any knowledge of Halacha that allows you to dispute my point?
ujmParticipantAmerican communists honor Biden, Harris and AOC.
ujmParticipantA husband he has both more responsibilities and rights.
ujmParticipantThe business with the picture and the mice effect sounds very fishy. I gravely doubt any veracity to it.
ujmParticipantIf the document was obtained illegally in any manner, such as through a hack, that itself is a criminal matter.
Even if it was not hacked, it is still a crime under U.S. Code Title 18, Section 641.
ujmParticipantThe leak is a criminal matter.
ujmParticipantWhatsApp facilities and enables a great deal of loshon hora, rechilus and ms”r.
ujmParticipantAvira, I believe mdd said you can read the Chazon Ish to say that anyone who became a full time baal aveira, including those that come from Frum families and were brought up Frum, to be tinokos shenishbu. And the CI was moida that his position is a shvere kula that goes against the accepted widespread Psak and interpretation of what Tinok Shenishba means. He didn’t indicate that’s an excuse for doing aveiras.
ujmParticipantIf you have a WhatsApp capable device, it is absolutely imperative to also have a very strong filter to control what is accessible on said device outside of WhatsApp.
ujmParticipantYour view is colored by the PR from the Kiruv professionals, who have every incentive, and do loudly, proclaim such views. But the Gedolei Rabbonim and the large majority of mainstream Roshei Yeshivos have not espoused that. As evidenced by Reb Moshe and Reb Shlomo Zalman.
ujmParticipantMarxist, Reb Moshe Feinstein and Rav Shlomo Zalman’s opinions regarding Tinok Shenishba is, in fact, the default normative Psak Klal Yisroel is noheg to follow. If that means (and it certainly does) that the majority of non-Orthodox Jews today are not Tinokos Shenishbu, that’s exactly what it means and is.
May 5, 2022 7:54 pm at 7:54 pm in reply to: The Longest Seder Contest�How Late Will Your Seder End? #2083698ujmParticipantIf you finish your Seder at Zman Krias Shma Shel Shachris, you can daven Shachris Vasikin, right after the Seder.
ujmParticipantYou’re welcome.
ujmParticipantReb Shayala’s brother moved to New York and his Kever is in Staten Island.
ujmParticipantRav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach said that non-frum Jews nowadays are not in the category of Tinok Shenishba. If they (a) know they are Jewish, and (b) know that they have the option of being religious, and (c ) the government will not persecute them if they become religious, then, he said, if they say they still do not want to become religious, they are no longer in the category of Tinokos Shenishbu.
ujmParticipantMarxist, he knows about Torah Judaism. That makes him absolutely not a tinok shenishba.
ujmParticipant“At least at my end, the first time I’ve seen a beekeeper in a Tallis katan.”
He kept the Tzitzis hanging outside his pants? Was he also wearing a fedora?
-
AuthorPosts