Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 18, 2012 7:13 pm at 7:13 pm in reply to: Frustrated Mothers of Girls: Can we hear your ideas #845563☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant
Gateways, in all fairness.
What have they done?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI would probably call it a grammar issue rather than a spelling issue.
January 18, 2012 3:47 pm at 3:47 pm in reply to: Frustrated Mothers of Girls: Can we hear your ideas #845560☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantAZ,
RC: go for it, and your suggested method of implementation is……
Rc pointed out that (s)he feels it can’t be implemented when (s)he said, “here is [my solution] although i know it cant be implemented”.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantHere is what the Be’er Moshe says about asking a shaila:
http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=888&st=&pgnum=76&hilite=
?????? ???? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ?? ?? ????? ?????, ????? ???? ???? ????, ???? ?? ??? ???? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??. ????? ??? ????? ?? ?? ????. ???? ???? ???? ?? ??? ???? ?? ??, ??? ???
???? ???? ?? ??? ?? ??. ????? ??, ????? ????? ??? ????? ??? ??? ??? ??? ????, ????? ?? ???? ??? ?? ??????, ??? ????? ?????? ???? ??? ????? ????? ???? ??? ??? ????? ??????? ?????, ??? ??? ??? ??????? ???? ??? ???? ??? ????? ??????? ?? ??? ????? ????.
He then explains why it’s assur, and concludes,
????? ???? ??? ??? ??? ???? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ??? ???? ??? ??? ?? ????? ?? ??? ????? ??? ????? ?? ????
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantDaasYochid
True we all paskin for ourselves but if we know Halacha then we arent paskening, we are keeping halacha. You need a psak when you are in doubt. Of course if one doesnt know much Halacha its very hard to even know what is a shaila.
You’re right. The term pasken implies that there’s a shailah, in which case unless one is himself very proficient in the pertinent halachos, a posek needs to be consulted.
I retract my previous post.
January 18, 2012 2:37 pm at 2:37 pm in reply to: If you've read "NASI Project Responds", have you changed your mind? #848145☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant<em<>You’re implying that the public perception of our rabbonim and R”Y is that they are hypocritical
Narishkeiten. For every Rov who is undersigned, there are hundreds who arent. As with almost every issue that doesnt involve a clear Mitzvah D’Oraisa, many opinions exist.
Your post doesn’t address mine. I was referring to the ones who did sign, and apy’s implied skepticism regarding how the public perceives their intention.
The fact that someone didn’t sign does not indicate opposition.
January 18, 2012 4:36 am at 4:36 am in reply to: If you've read "NASI Project Responds", have you changed your mind? #848140☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantApy,
You’re implying that the public perception of our rabbonim and R”Y is that they are hypocritical and are suggesting a solution for the masses which they would never follow themselves or suggest for loved ones. I hope you’re wrong, and that the general public’s trust has not been so horribly eroded.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI am just curious to know how their REBBETZINS, mothers, sisters, and DAUGHTERS truly feel about this endorsement and the NASI program.
Now that their names are listed, you can probably ask them.
I can tell you that I asked some of my female relatives, out of my own curiosity, how they felt about it, and they were positive. Hardly scientific, but the assumption that all females are against it is untrue.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantHappym19, crazybrit was assuming that your screen name was based on your age, and that you wanted to change it because you had a birthday.
In case you want a new screen name, you can simply open a new account with a different email address. As long as you don’t use both to appear as two different posters, the mods should be fine with it (although you never know if one mod wasn’t paying attention when this rule was taught in mod school 😉 ).
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantR-b,
Thanks for reminding everyone of my past sins, but you know, I’ve done teshuva. 😉
In theory, the mods could assure that no real mischief goes on by giving every legit member a subtitle (it could be as simple as repeating the screen name) but I suppose it would be tedious.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant“Health –
I like to Pasken for myself when I can. But you have to try to take out any Negious.”
WIY –
Health
You gotta be kidding me. Please tell me you are joking?!
WIY, we all pasken for ourselves. The more one knows, the fewer shailos need to be asked of a “posek”. Negius comes in not only in deciding what is assur or muttar, but also in deciding what needs to be asked.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantA troll deliberately asks questions or posts threads that are guaranteed to cause trouble, and then sits back and watches everyone duke it out.
In my case, I don’t think I’ve started any threads, and I usually get down and dirty myself!
January 18, 2012 3:58 am at 3:58 am in reply to: Frustrated Mothers of Girls: Can we hear your ideas #845556☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantRc,
Boys need to come home earlier from israel.
Mathematically, that should help.
RYs need to own up to this crisis by imposing takanos
You were right that takanos are difficult to implement. There’s enough negativity towards programs that are purely voluntary; imagine the backlash if R”Y tried to impose their will by force!
that mothers of boys respond in a reasonable amount of time.
If the lack of timely response is causing the boys to put their dating on hold, then you’re right to associate it with the disparity in numbers. If, however, there is no immediate answer because the boy is already busy with someone else, I don’t see what there is to do about it – there’s no point in a boy (or his mother) giving a definite “no” if there is a possibility that at some point he’ll want to meet her.
There is a way to close the gap that the R”Y of some yeshivos could implement – the post E.Y. yeshivos could limit acceptance to bochurim under a certain age, which would “force” them to return from E.Y. sooner. This is actually implementable, but many factors would have to go into such a decision.
January 18, 2012 3:43 am at 3:43 am in reply to: Frustrated Mothers of Girls: Can we hear your ideas #845555☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantDY, not THAT much older!
I’m not sure how much older you thought I meant.
I should clarify that NASI does not seem to be advocating literally encouraging girls to wait to get married, but obviously if the 22 and 23 year olds are focused on, it would lead to fewer 19 year olds getting married.
January 18, 2012 1:34 am at 1:34 am in reply to: Frustrated Mothers of Girls: Can we hear your ideas #845550☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant(and really, it is not by choice, much of the time – they are sometimes pushed into it before they are ready)
Well, that’s not Hashem’s doing, it’s the doing of those pushing them to get married before they’re ready – also human bechirah.
If you’re right that girls are being pushed into getting married before they’re ready, then advocating shidduchim with “older girls”
would be beneficial anyhow.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantDY is a troll
Someone finally figured me out. 🙂
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSoliek,
On a different thread, AZ posted the following (referring to the current NASI program):
This program is endorsed by the following Rabbonim and Roshei Yeshiva
Rav Moshe Brown Shlita (Far Rockaway)
Rav Kalman Epstein Shlita (Queens)
Rav Yaakov Forcheimer Shlita (Lakewood)
Rav Shmuel Fuerst Shlita (Chicago)
Rav Moshe Mordechai Lowi Shlita (Toronto)
Rav Yaakov Neuberger Shlita (Teaneck)
Rav Shlomo Feivel Schustal Shlita (Brooklyn)
Rav Dovid Weinberger Shlita (Lawrence)
Rav Herschel Welcher Shlita (Queens)
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThe Rabbonim and Roshei Yeshiva had accidentally signed a death warrant on the Kollel and Yeshiva system!
I completely fail to follow your logic. The rest, therefore, is also incomprehensible to me.
(through an unbalanced spokesman)
Your personal attack does nothing to enhance your credibility.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantpba – The poster is less than an hour old.
Yes, but this is a personal question and a regular poster might want to separate it from her regular screen name.
Now, had the poster asked, “I’ve always wanted to marry a learning boy, and I am going out with someone who seems to be a baal midos, I hear he’s a big masmid, and he has a wonderful personality, but someone told me that when he was learning in E.Y. he didn’t ibber meiser and took a cigarette once a month. Should I marry him?”, I would say (s)he’s definitely a troll.
DY is a troll
January 17, 2012 7:33 pm at 7:33 pm in reply to: Frustrated Mothers of Girls: Can we hear your ideas #845544☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWhich is?
Which is different for each individual. Some of these rabbonim allow young women go to college, some probably don’t.
Many young women teach, many take other jobs.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantRav Moshe still only meant it as a Chumra, I think.
It seems to me that he considered it assur, but not necessarily because of amira l’akum, rather, because of zilzul Shabbos.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantHe holds it is Amira l’Akum
He says ????.
January 17, 2012 6:02 am at 6:02 am in reply to: Frustrated Mothers of Girls: Can we hear your ideas #845542☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantJust curious what the Rabbonim who endorsed this program suggest and approve these girls do?
Probably the same they are recommending for the already plentiful group of unmarried 20-22 year old females.
January 17, 2012 6:00 am at 6:00 am in reply to: Frustrated Mothers of Girls: Can we hear your ideas #845541☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantOomis,
“Hashem did not create more female lives than males lives…”
It seems evident that He did, if there are so many of them.
There aren’t more females than males, there are more females who have chosen to enter the “shidduch scene” than there are males who have entered the scene.
That reality is a human choice – the societal decision to have the more populous age group of one gender (19-20 year old girls) begin to seek their spouses at the same time as a less populated group – the 22-23 tear old boys.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantYitayningwut,
Try this:
Exactly like cholov hacompany.
You mean chalav akum. There’s no such thing as cholov hacompany anymore because the government no longer inspects the dairies for which species the milk comes from.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantchassidishY.U.type,
????? ????? ???????
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantPopcorn,
That’s an unusual scenario, because one can still light after the z’man on Yom Tov, from an existing light.
January 16, 2012 1:31 am at 1:31 am in reply to: If you've read "NASI Project Responds", have you changed your mind? #848129☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantOomis,
Still improper to use (if one is concerned with the origin of the word), but for a different reason.
January 15, 2012 10:36 pm at 10:36 pm in reply to: Frustrated Mothers of Girls: Can we hear your ideas #845508☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantApy,
Do you think anyone has better priorities than we do?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantYou can’t bring a ???? from one incident.
I wasn’t. Yitaynigwut has demonstrated his mentchlichkeit before.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIf one ever forgets to light {and not for the reasons that you “adorable” state that happened in your circumstances} and does have to light an extra candle, this only continues until the following Yom Kippur inclusive.
Not according to the Shulchan Aruch (263-1).
http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14171&st=&pgnum=72&hilite=
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantYitayningwut,
You’re a mentch.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantR-b,
That SG meant nothing teefer than what you knew he meant.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantOh, THAT kind of chazarah. 😉
Seriously, the Dirshu method is very effective. I may have the details wrong, but it goes something like this:
Every day, learn a particular amount, after chazering the limud from the previous day.
Chazer everything from the week on Shabbos.
Chazer all of that once a month.
This is short term, aside from any project to constantly chazer all previous limudim.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSG,
Actually, I meant the “pshuto shel mikra” as under stood by the “mavinim”, which, I guess, is not actually the pshuto shel mikra.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMake sure you use a blech.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantHealth,
Would you like me to go through the posts of yours, before the milchama line, in which you could have been more respectful?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSo the problem is that there are very few boys who have this mindset compared to the number of girls. Rabbi Hoffman actually had an article similar to this point in this weeks FTJT.
Yes, but Rabbi Hoffman does not consider it a cause of the shidduch crises. He considers it an effect of the shidduch crises (demographics) and poor midos.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantsnjn:
The point that I was trying to make originally was the reason the chassidim don’t have a shidduch crises can be for many reasons and not necessarily only the younger age the boys marry. They look for a shidduch wish such a different attitude. Poor girls don’t get left behind, neither to fat girls. That’s what I was trying to say.
Choosiness would explain why there are many singles remaining; it wouldn’t explain why there’s an imbalance; a much higher percentage of girls than boys. If there were an equal number of boys as girls, for every poor or overweight girl who was left behind, there would be an unmarried boy.
January 15, 2012 4:44 am at 4:44 am in reply to: If you've read "NASI Project Responds", have you changed your mind? #848121☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMSS,
I don’t think anyone ever tried to imply that there is any chiyuv to join.
I apologize if you didn’t mean anything negative about the signators.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantApparently, “ein mikra yotzi midei p’shuto” applies here as well.
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/iced-coffee-or-iced-tea#post-344775
January 15, 2012 4:24 am at 4:24 am in reply to: If you've read "NASI Project Responds", have you changed your mind? #848119☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantOomis and 42, golly is a euphemism for G-d.
January 15, 2012 4:22 am at 4:22 am in reply to: If you've read "NASI Project Responds", have you changed your mind? #848118☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMedium Size Shadchan,
Giving approval to a specific project is, in fact, encouraging people to join it, at least under certain circumstances. If under the same circumstances, these rabbonim and R”Y wouldn’t join, as you imply, it would be hypocritical.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantYitayningwut,
Yes, short is not the opposite of wide, but ????? can (and does, in this case,) mean narrow, not short.
The clothing of the ??? ????? created an issue of ??? ??? (in other words the men’s clothing was visually similar to the women’s) because, says ??”?, their clothing, as opposed to the ??? ?????? (who had ?????), was ????? ??? ???. In context, clearly ????? means the opposite of ?????.
The ???? then contrasts the clothing of the ????? to that of the ?????. The ????? had ????? that, says ??”?, were ????? ?????, and those of the ????? ??????? were ?????, so they were ????? ?? ???. The ?????, however, had ????? that, says ??”?, were ????? and therefore dissimilar to the men’s ?????. Again, clearly, ????? is the opposite of ?????.
January 15, 2012 3:08 am at 3:08 am in reply to: If you've read "NASI Project Responds", have you changed your mind? #848114☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantAZ:
Dear Moderator: I’m told…
That probably wasn’t a moderator. Anybody can write in bold.
January 15, 2012 3:04 am at 3:04 am in reply to: If you've read "NASI Project Responds", have you changed your mind? #848113☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMedium Size Shadchan:
Im still wondering if ONE of the undersigned have SIGNED UP their own daughters or granddaughters and committed their own hard earned $G$E$L$T$.
snow:
But, even if it was hard, they probably wouldn’t fork over all that money…
What motivates you to be so cynical when you have absolutely no idea what these talmidei chachamim have done or would do?
What right do you have to accuse them of hypocrisy without a shred of evidence?
Shame on both of you.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI referred to the study finding how many girls were still unmarried. Since you did not study the boys, all you have is the conjecture- but no study. I don’t see how you can disagree with that.
Sorry, I thought you were referring to a study which demonstrated that there were more younger girls than older girls. But since you agree that that’s true, and that we start with the “pool” containing more girls than boys, the assumption would be that it remains that way unless either more girls leave the pool, or more boys join it. Again, it seems the opposite.
So you concede that more boys are leaving the pool than girls? So that means that there are also more girls because boys are leaving the pool? So then even if we solve the age gap, there will still be more boys than girls?
Very likely. That doesn’t in any way obviate the need to close the gap. L’moshol, if a family needed to spend $50,000 anually on living expenses but was only earning $48,000, we wouldn’t suggest that they give up a side job with an income of $5,000 (part of the $48k) since they’re anyhow not making ends meet.
Had the reverse been true, and there were more girls leaving the pool and/or more boys leaving, then age gap might counterbalance that and we could keep it. That, I believe, is not the case, however.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantyitayningwut,
I think the pashut pshat is that ????? is the opposite of ????? ??? ???? ????.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantPba,
You acknowledge that (1) there are more 9th graders than 12th graders.
I assume (correct me if I’m wrong) that you would extend that to say that (2) there are fewer 12th grade boys than there are 9th grade girls, and that you would also agree that (3) the tendency is for the 12th grade buys to marry the 9th grade girls (eventually).
You started this thread assuming two flaws in the application of these facts to the shidduch crises. The first, if point (2) is conceded, would have to be retracted altogether. The second would only be true if it were reasonable to assume that there are more girls leaving the conventional shidduch pool than boys. Anecdotal evidence suggests the opposite, and it’s a waste of time, money, and energy to try to prove the obvious with a controlled study.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant(Females, whisper, so the men won’t hear.)
Unless the men are in the IDF.
-
AuthorPosts