Someday

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 63 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Radak on Azah #2242388
    Someday
    Participant

    @My Voice

    I did mention our current status of galus until the moment we do teshuvah, and then ובא לציון גואל ולשבי פשע וגו׳.

    in reply to: Radak on Azah #2242148
    Someday
    Participant

    An addition was done for SEO. Sorry, I should not have done that.

    in reply to: Political Conversations of Old #2242047
    Someday
    Participant

    @CTLAWYER

    Fine. Again at today’s 10 xs equivalency’s:
    1960
    A $4,000,000 income would be left with $1,515,000 minus all the other brackets I did not calculate from the first dollar.
    Over 4 mil – 91% ($0 tax)
    Over 1.5 mil – 87% ($2,175,000 tax)
    Over .5 mil – 62% ($310,00)

    https://web.stanford .edu/class/polisci120a/immigration/Federal%20Tax%20Brackets.pdf

    in reply to: Political Conversations of Old #2241989
    Someday
    Participant

    @Menachem Shmei
    That prayer would be wonderful if it would have remained in public schools.
    However, if not for that law, other prayers with shituf might have been instituted, in which case, good they stopped it.

    in reply to: Political Conversations of Old #2241924
    Someday
    Participant

    >>I remember my father’s joy when JFK cut a 91% top income tax rate.<<

    If JFK had left that alone, wouldn’t have a deficit today. However, probably we would then also not the powerful economy we have.

    That 91% tax rate, was for the bracket of those earning the equivalent today of around $4,000,000.
    However, outrageous for a guy earning 4 mil to be left with only $400,000?!

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2223267
    Someday
    Participant

    The Mishna Berurah consistently quotes rulings of the Shulchan Aruch Harav. He was gerechunt/considered from the Gedolei Ha’Achroinim. However, the M”B changed his name to the Shulchan Aruch HaGra”Z, not as he was known Harav.

    I would ask the moderator to close this thread. We should be afraid, especially days before R”H of the horrible insults of a talmid chacham & a manhig in Klal Yisra’el. Delete those comments or the entire thread too. Thank you

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2223218
    Someday
    Participant

    The maaseh was, someone asked R’ Chaim Volozhiner if the Gaon was as big as the Rambam. R’ Chaim Volozhiner replied, “ulai keRamban.” The velt was amazed that R’ Chaim Volozhiner was able to differentiate between the Rambam and the Ramban…

    When the Poiskim are counting for roiv deiois in a machloikes Roishoinim, they count the Gaon as one of the Roishonim.
    I wondered, if the would count the Shaagas Aryeh in that too.

    My friend, Hagaon R’ Avi Ort shlit”a heard directly from Maran R’ Moishe who said, “ven mir iz gevezzen yung, mir flegt kuken oif der Rebbe Akiva Eiger azoivi mir hoben gekukt oif der Gaon.
    Rebbe Akiva Eiger is also considered by many poiskim like the daas of a Roishon.

    I have never heard on the Gaon the phrase the neshamah of a Roishon, just (and more to his credit,) he reached the level of Roishonim.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2223086
    Someday
    Participant

    ARSo,

    Nothing wrong. Or not so terrible. The Rebbe z”l wanted a zechus for himself. (He knew he was nebach not living over children.) Though I don’t get the zechus of a siyum on a birthday. I guess he wanted some connection to what he thought was a big mifal he originated. He did not know when his yarhtzeit would be. The siyum Ramban each year should have continued to come out on his b’day. However, one ibbur yohr throws it off.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2222440
    Someday
    Participant

    @moshekapoyer 1st post above,
    Over stated, but 👍


    @commonsaychel
    👍

    in reply to: False Claim about Jewish History #2222455
    Someday
    Participant

    @smerel and always,

    Not true. Historically incorrect.

    Speak to Yeshivaleit from between the 2 world wars. Unfortunately, hard to find today. I have, first and secondhand. They tell, how there were days there was literally no food to eat. They all new that the tziyoinim’s clubhouse, (funded by donors to their movement, who would not fund the Yeshivos,) offered a free hot lunch to anyone who wanted. Not one Yeshiva bachur would go there. Why? They responded, I don’t know what goes on there. All we knew was, any frum person who walked in there, walked out a fraiyer. Maran R’ Shlomeh Zalman Auerbach z”l, related the same thing went on in his youth, about ih”k Yerushalayim t”v and the gymnasium on rechov Keren Kayemit, down the road from his home in Shaarei Chesed.

    The zionist would say, we can’t build a medina with every other day a Yom Tov and other mitzvos.
    Maran R’ Chaim Solovetchik z”l said, they claim they are abolishing religion in order to build a medinah. However, the truth is they are building a medinah in order to abolish religion.

    in reply to: Thank you Anonymous in Lakewood #2222435
    Someday
    Participant

    @1 👍

    in reply to: False Claim about Jewish History #2222430
    Someday
    Participant

    In half of your posts, you just keep repeating your same stupidity over and over, refusing to address my answer.

    The other half of your posts, are totally unintelligible. One sentence does not connect to the other.

    >> The main reason I am not an anti Zionist, is because when there is a chance to improve Torah and Mitzvos in The State, the Chareidi extreme anti Zionists are nowhere to be found.<<
    What in the world are you talking about?? Where have the zionist wanted to help with Torah uMitzvos??
    The zionist have shmadded up a million Yidden and are the reason 10s of thousand were killed R”N.
    No erhliche Yid would want to have anything to do with them.

    >> The second reason is that the anti Zionists keep pushing propaganda about all the problems that Zionism causes. I don’t get it.<<
    What don’t you get? You only get pushing your propaganda against erhliche Yidden who anti tziyoinim?

    >>If you really think that Zionism is a problem according to The Torah, even if it apparently gave us endless blessings we would abhor Zionism.<<
    We do abhor zionism.

    >>So what does all this history prove? It achieves one thing. It cheapens Jewish Blood.<<
    Not intelligible.

    >> But I hope we agree that it is all besides the point.<<
    What is besides the point??
    In any case, I do not agree with any of your gibberish.
    You write like ch”v had a stroke or ch”v have demntia?
    How old are you?
    Did you go to a real Yeshiva?
    Did you have any Torahdig chinuch?
    What exactly qualifies you to have an opinion in this, against ruba d’ruba, if not all, Gedolei Hador from the start of zionism?

    Please stop

    in reply to: False Claim about Jewish History #2222427
    Someday
    Participant

    n0mesorah

    In half of your posts, you just keep repeating your same stupidity over and over, refusing to address my answer.

    The other half of your posts, are totally unintelligible. One sentence does not connect to the other.

    >> The main reason I am not an anti Zionist, is because when there is a chance to improve Torah and Mitzvos in The State, the Chareidi extreme anti Zionists are nowhere to be found.<<
    What in the world are you talking about?? Where have the zionist wanted to help with Torah uMitzvos??
    The zionist have shmadded up a million Yidden and are the reason 10s of thousand were killed R”N.
    No erhliche Yid would want to have anything to do with them.

    >> The second reason is that the anti Zionists keep pushing propaganda about all the problems that Zionism causes. I don’t get it.<<
    What don’t you get? You only get pushing your propaganda against erhliche Yidden who anti tziyoinim?

    >>If you really think that Zionism is a problem according to The Torah, even if it apparently gave us endless blessings we would abhor Zionism.<<
    We do abhor zionism.

    >>So what does all this history prove? It achieves one thing. It cheapens Jewish Blood.<<
    Not intelligible.

    >> But I hope we agree that it is all besides the point.<<
    What is besides the point.
    You write like ch”v had a stroke or ch”v have demntia?
    How old are you?
    Did you go to a real Yeshiva?
    Did you have any Torahdig chinuch?
    What exactly qualifies you to have an opinion in this, against ruba d’ruba, if not all, Gedolei Hador from the start of zionism?
    The screen name you chose, “n0mesorah,” admits to not having any mesorah. And you are proud of it??

    Please stop.

    in reply to: False Claim about Jewish History #2222276
    Someday
    Participant

    @n0mesorah

    >> I have never met an anti-Zionist that was truthful. So, what is the point of this thread?<<
    No point in answering you, with your sick attitude. However, for others here who also fell in to suffer from your words:

    The problem in pre-war Europe was not assimilation. They married Jews. It was abandoning religion. (Which I suspect, you would not consider a problem.)

    The issue was the Yidden suffering from terrible poverty. The Zionist, Communistm and Bundistin came along and offered their solutions to alleviate the poverty situation, which included abandoning religion.

    >>The Old Yishuv made plenty of problems without the Zionists.<<
    I have no idea what you are talking about. I doubt you do either.

    >>Rav Yosef Chaim preceded the Zionists by at most, two generations.<<
    Maran Harav Yoisef Chayim Sonnefeld z”l was niftar Feb. 6, 1932! That was well into the heat of Zionism. (According to you, Zionism began in 1972!!??) Zionism began in 1897. Before 1920, their movement was shmadding up Yidden and making the Arabs angry.

    >>There was a lot of history before then. It was a hard place for Jews to live.<<
    What is your point here??

    >>There are around ten thousand actual casualties of actual wars. There are another ten thousand that were killed in more ‘peaceful’ attacks.<<
    Those “‘peaceful’ attacks” were also because of the Zionists!!

    >>I have never met an anti-Zionist that was truthful. So, what is the point of this thread?<<
    I have never met an Israeli Zionist. Zionists are Dinosaurs. Today almost all Israelis just want to survive and make a living.
    The handful of remaining Zionist, are the few kipa srugot and a few loudmouth Americans. I am sure you live in America, Mr. Zionist.

    in reply to: False Claim about Jewish History #2221964
    Someday
    Participant

    Btw Always, you don’t have to be Neturei Karta to feel the way I have expressed. I, personally, am not Neturei Karta. Satmat, Brisk and the Chazon Ishnikers, are anti the zionist, but not Neturei Karta. The Neturei Karta was always just a handful of Yidden who made a lot of noise. All others, including the above, were strongly and verbally opposed to the Neturei Karta’s methods.

    in reply to: False Claim about Jewish History #2221963
    Someday
    Participant

    Always,

    Between the 2 world wars, a number of million Yidden were shmad by joining the “bundistin” and the “communistin,” as you said. The approximately 1 million Jews who came to America before the Holocaust, also had almost all become off the derech, as you pointed out. Reason given was the hardship in holding a job while being Shoimer Shabbos.
    However, there were an additional 1 million Yidden who were turned irreligious by joining the “tzionistin.”
    The city Satmar in Hungary turned 50% irreligious at the end because of zionism. (Hence, the Satmar Rebbe z”l’s brewing hatred of the tziyoinim. He saw first hand what they did to the youth in his town.) The famous video of Munkatch in Hungary before WWII, with the boys and girls dancing together to zionist music, also had 50% shmad from tziyoinim. Vilna and Brisk in Lithuania (Lita,) by 1938 were turned 97% irreligious by the 3 sects, Bundist, Communist & Zionist. (Practically all, besides for the 2,000 bachurim of the famous Yeshivos.) These are a few examples by cities and countries.

    in reply to: False Claim about Jewish History #2221678
    Someday
    Participant

    Always,
    So the old Yishuv would have moved out of Israel.
    Better than the shmad of over 1 million yidden.
    Better than the 10s of thousands of Yidden killed in Israeli wars.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2221153
    Someday
    Participant

    @youdontsay
    When I said 3 mechitzos, I was referring to the 3 redundant tzuros hapesech put up by 3 independent batei dininim.
    The Teshuvos HaRashba’s psak is accepted, not to use a tzuras hapesach for a RH”R deOirsissa. If shishim riboi is required to constitute a RH”R deOiraissa according to roiv Roishoinim (which I believe is what you were touching on,) depends on how you count the shitois. This is the famous machloikes of the Mishkonois Yaakov and the Bais Ephraim. See SH”A OR”CH soman 364 se’if 2, Bais Ephraim OR”CH siman 26 and Chazon Ish OR”CH siman 107 ois 4. [The Mishkanois Yaakov became famous with this teshuvah of his in disagreement with the renowned gadol hadol R’ Ephraim Zalman Margoliois z”l.]
    (I think?)

    in reply to: Maharal’s Golem #2221148
    Someday
    Participant

    כל ארצות עיסה לארץ ישראל, וארץ ישראל עיסה לבבל.
    Before Ezra left Bavel to lead most of Klal Yisra’el back up to Eretz Yisra’el, he clarified the yichus of all the Yidden remaining in Bavel, and took any of the mamzeirim or other pesulei kahal up with him. Leaving Bavel as the area most kasher to marry from. (Gemara Kiddushin Perek Asarah Yuchsin.) Ezra did this because he was not leaving Rabbanim over in Bavel to watch over yichus matters.
    (It is not referring to “descendants of Ezra.” Rather to Ezra Hasofer’s work in clarifying the nations Yichus. Yichus here refers to halachakly allowed to marry to all Yiden.)

    in reply to: Maharal’s Golem #2221068
    Someday
    Participant

    @ujm
    Newly made up Lubavitch reference, gezh. Slang for being at least 2nd or 3rd year Lubavitch.
    Word source is “megeza hayichus,” which a term in the world of true yichus – liniage of Rabbonim and Talmidei Chachamim.
    The real Lubavitch term is, for those of is who shtam from the first chasidim of the Alter Rebbe (he only had about 5.) We are the “Geboirener.” Most Lubavitchers today became Lubavitch by the Heintege Rebbe z”l or the Friedeker Rebbe z”l. Behind their backs, we call them “the tzugekumeners.”
    A zaida who was in tefisah in Sibeer is a huge yichus.
    I have yet to see a Lubavitcher be even remotely impressed when I tell them each of the 7 Rebbes was meshadech / mechutanim with family. Or that I am eblcht”a cousins with the Rebbe z”l. My grandfather was 2nd cousins with the rebbe z”l. The rebbe’s father and my grandfather’s mother were first cousins. Their mothers were sisters. They had a common grandfather.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2221051
    Someday
    Participant

    Then you have to know what is “Tzidei Reshus Harabim KeRH”R.” The Chazon Ish has a drawing/shitah on this in his sefer, that would extend Ocean Parkway quite some distance of side streets to side streets.

    It is also well known that R’ Ahron Kotler z”l would not allow an eiruv in Lakewood because of the amount of traffic on Rt. 9.

    in reply to: An End to Shidduch Résumés by Rabbi Chananya Weissman #2220914
    Someday
    Participant

    That was before the digital age. It used to be a lot of work on the Shadchan going back and forth by phone, and writing down by hand all the stats questions and answers. Now, you can just email or message a shidduch profile with all the basic stats. What’s wrong with that?
    It is like saying do not redd a shidduch by phone, since in the old days, before telephones, shidduchim were redd in person or by mail…

    in reply to: reb shayala brother #2220913
    Someday
    Participant

    The claim is someone was planning on going to Keristier. Then he had a dream, R’ Shayale Ketistirer came to him and said, why do you have to come all the way here? You have my brother right there.

    I do not understand why people would believe the dream means anything. No one else going had that dream.

    in reply to: Elokai Netzor, or not? #2220911
    Someday
    Participant

    OP, that’s the way it is done.

    in reply to: BE AWARE!!!!!!!! #2220908
    Someday
    Participant

    Maybe they believe theirs cost more to produce and is better quality.
    In any case, it is so close to tge fearful aveirah of mishkolois, they should be afraid.

    in reply to: Maharal’s Golem #2220907
    Someday
    Participant

    Isn’t the legend that anyone who went up to the Maharl’s shul’s attic, where the Golem remained after the Maharal was niftar, came back down insane. They therefore locked the door, and everyone was afraid to go up.

    As a kid I read the book “The Golem of Prague” by Gershon Winkler. I remember really enjoying it.

    I had a Rebbe, an adam gadol, who in shiur said over something from the Maharal’s sefer on Mesechta Shabbos (regular “Achron” style chiddushim on Gemara, Rashi & Toisfois.) He looked up and said straight faced, when the Maharal wasn’t making Golem’s he wrote chiddushim on Mesechte Shabbos.

    in reply to: Maharal’s Golem #2220906
    Someday
    Participant

    The story with the Vilna Gaon was, he told a talmid that after learning Sefer Yetzirah he started to make a Golem. But then he had a siman min Shamayim to stop. The Gaon said he understood it to be a message that he was too young to be doing this. The talmid asked the Gaon how old was he at the time. The Gaon answered, 10 years old.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2220904
    Someday
    Participant

    @Hoo Hoo
    A reshus harabim deOraisa cannot have an eiruv, even with 3 mechitzos around it.

    in reply to: COLOR WAR LEVAYA #2220901
    Someday
    Participant

    I liked it.

    in reply to: Chris Christie – why can’t Jews rally around him? #2220900
    Someday
    Participant

    @Yechiell, OP,
    Trump need a 2nd term to follow up.
    Trump is a businessman. He ran the country like a business. Christy is a politician.
    Any candidate running for President, really has no idea what the job entails, or what he will be able to do. He finds out if he gets there. You can’t really hold a first term President to his campaign promises. He said what he wants to do with the wall. Not necessarily, that he will be able to. Christy knows this, and is lying in these complaints. He helped get Trump elected the first time, with the expectation of a cabinet level position. Trump stiffed him, so now Christy hates him. Interesting, that Trump also gave nothing to Guliani, who also helped get him elected. Yet, Guliani does not seem angry about that.

    in reply to: False Claim about Jewish History #2220896
    Someday
    Participant

    @Square_Route
    All that history quoted by you, the OP, may be true. However, in this particular place and time, Palestine, before the Zionist in Europe started making noise about taking over the country, the local Arabs and Jews got along very well. Maran R’ Yoisef Chaim Sonnenfeld z”l would remark about this.

    in reply to: charles tyrwhitt #2220892
    Someday
    Participant

    @Always
    If that’s your only problem, you’ve got gold. Appreciate him.

    in reply to: Bring Back Bambas in the Backpacks?? #2220887
    Someday
    Participant

    Peanut allergies can ch”v be deadly. Google it.

    in reply to: Who’s job is it to get the Shul involved in lecha dodi #2220885
    Someday
    Participant

    @Rocky

    @Always_Ask_Questions

    True.
    However, the Shulchan Aruch says not to complain when they sing by davening on Shabbos. Look by the simanim of davening Arvis and Shachris on Shabbos.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2220741
    Someday
    Participant

    @CS I happen to be in no way whatsoever a “meshichist.”
    However, what you are saying about that Lubavitcher fellow refusing to abide by the rules of logic, actually, I found that to be a fascinating, and within the reasons of logic, that new position you quoted from him:
    “The Rebbe became Moshiach while he was still alive and so it doesn’t contradict Chofetz Chaim and he’ll return to finish the job.”

    We have established that Moshiach will not be 100% proven to be, until he “finishes the job” etc…
    However, there will certainly be a time of “techilas Mashiach,” when he will have needed supporters who feel the reasonable possibility of him being the one, and will help him on his way to see if H’ let’s him succed. e. g. Rebbe Akiva and Bar Koziba.

    Now, first take away all bias (and sorry to say, sinnas chinom.) 2nd, understand Mashiach will certainly be a talmid chacham & tzaddik. However, his place will not be as a Rosh Yeshiva or Poisek Hador. His place will be as described by the Messilas Yesharim Perek 25 (I believe) on Madhiach Tzidkeinu. That certainly sounds to an extant like the Lubavitcher Rebbe z”l.

    Given all this, there is some logic to want to support the Heinteger (that’s his name among the 7) Rebbe (Z”L, emphasis applied) in the possibility of his being able to be Mashiach.

    Now, as to the source argument that Mashiach will be from the living, and the Rebbe z”l was niftar, you received a logical possible answer, maybe the Rebbe z”l started the job in his lifetime which fulfils that criteria. Fine, not likely, because this would require him to come back to life before Techiyas Hameisim, but possible. There were cases of individual techiyas hameisim by the Tana’im. Do you have a proof positive source against this?

    Y. M. S.
    Lakewood

    in reply to: Why BDE #2217032
    Someday
    Participant

    I see

    שיטת הט”ז (יור”ד רמ יג): שהחותמים זלה”ה טועים ומחסרים וצריך לחתום זללה”ה.

    יש אומרים: שיכול לומר שאר לשונות כגון “עליו השלום” “מנוחתו כבוד” מנוחותו בג”ע וכד’ (בן איש חי שופטים יד).

    המנהג לומר ז”ל ויש מקצת שנוהגים לכתוב זללה”ה (ערוה”ש יור”ד רמ ל).

    כתיבת מכתב שמזכיר בו את אביו
    יש אומרים: שאף בתוך י”ב חודש צריך לכתוב זכרונו לברכה לחיי העולם הבא (רמ”א בדרכי משה רמ ד בשם שלטי גיבורים), והטעם: כיון שכתיבתו מתקיימת אף לאחר י”ב חודש.

    יש שהשמיטו: את תיבה “לברכה” (רי”ף דף לד , ב בדפי הרי”ף בסוף העמוד ורמב”ם).

    יש שהשמיטו: תיבות “לחיי העולם הבא” (טור שו”ע רמ ט).

    כמה פעמים לומר באותו שיעור יש אומרים: מסתבר שתוך הספד או דרשה או שיעור לא צריך לומר
    הריני כפרת משכבו כל פעם ופעם שמזכירו אלא פעם אחת סגי (הגרח”ק והגרנ”ק הובא בספר זכרון יוסף צבי דינר).

    הדפסת כתבי ידי אביו: המדפיס כתבי יד של אביו מקיים מצות כיבוד אב (על פי שו”ת התעוררות תשובה ח”ג סימן יט).

    https://www.dirshu.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/כיבוד-אביו-ואמו-אחר-מותם.pdf

    Then he says his own Shtikel Toirah, but not bad

    הטעם שמוסיפים לחיי עולם הבא: כדי לשנות ממה שנהגו שאמרו על אדם חיי “זכור לטוב” כמו שמצאנו ביומא (לח, א) אצל אברהם לכן הוסיפו “לחיי העולם הבא” (מהרש”א קידושין לא, ב ד”ה מכאן ואילך).
    ולדבריו שפיר מנהג העולם שלא מקפידים לומר לחיי העולם הבא כיון שלא נוהגים לומר על אדם חי “זכור לטוב” שהוספה זו נוספה רק להבדיל בין חיים למתים.

    in reply to: Why BDE #2217009
    Someday
    Participant

    Actually, regarding the Gemara in Kiddushin, which says, when a son mentions his father who was niftar, he should append to mentioning his father “Zichronoi leveracha lechayei ha’olam haba,” (after the first year of saing (Hareini Kaparas Mishkovoi,) the poiskim in Yoreh Dei’ah Hilchos Aveilus (I believe the TA”Z) say this should be done in writing too. However, they do say, roshei teivos “Zllh”h” is sufficient. In other words, nothing wrong with roshei teivos.

    I was wondering recently, why is it that you do it see it often in print “zllh”h,” however, I never hear anyone say in speaking “my father zichroinoi leveracha lechayei ha’olam haba.? Even in Brisk, where they often quote “der Tatte” they do not say it.
    Any answers?
    I should check the Aruch Hashulchan.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2209506
    Someday
    Participant

    @Menachem Shmei
    Thank you.
    Where is that quote, or the original source from the Alter Rebbe z”l?

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2209448
    Someday
    Participant

    @sechel83 Good question. After techiyas hamaisim, we will have back Rebbe Akiva Eiger, The Rambam, The Ramban, The Rashba, Abaye veRava, Rebbe Meir and R’ Yehuda etc… etc…, and as you say Moishe Rabeinu, the greatest navi who ever was or whoever will be. How can Mashiach born in our generation possibly be a leader over them?

    R’ Yerucham z”l, the (alter) Mirrer mashgiach, asks this question.

    He answers, that although obviously niskatnu hadoiros, even so, in one way, our generation is above all previous generations. We have nisyoinois they did not have…

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2198229
    Someday
    Participant

    @AviraDeArah
    I like the thought. I like the he’orah. It is a chiddush which may be a possibility. However, you have not brought any proof to it.
    You actually seem to be mixing together 2 possibilities.
    1) That the Toras Hachasidus is “Penimius HaTorah,” (which I believe is a more standard consideration,) which you want to say that Toras Hamussar is also Penimius HaTorah.
    This I do not see. It is not mistabra that Mussar is the Penimus HaTorah that Chassidus is meant to be.
    2) That Toras Hachissidus is meant to teach one to be oived H’ be’leiv with one’s heart. In which case one can argue that Toras Hamussar accomplishes the same thing. This I found interesting.
    However, regarding what you said that the Yeshivos accomplish this with Mussar, I have not seen Yeshivos really focusing on Mussar to this degree.
    I would venture to defend the Yeshivos, by understanding that the hatzlachah fun a zach is liggen in dem. Bachurim and even young yungeleit have to lig and focus on one thing to succeed. Eat, sleep and breathe Baba Kama, Baba Metziah or Eiruvin, whatever they are learning to first become Talmidei Chachamim. Afterwards, they can focus on Mussar and Avoidas H’ be’lev. Loi am ha’aretz chasid.
    Also, Mussar, and for Sefer Choivois Halevavois to go into you, requires maturity and having R”n gone through some of life’s tribulations, which comes later on. (I, personally, have found this difference myself, how Mussar and Choivas Halevavois did not really work for me in my younger days, the way it works for me now, older and having gone through mill [to say the least…])
    – YMS

    in reply to: Did we really go to the moon #2191140
    Someday
    Participant

    @mentch1
    I was very serious. Even a pressurized tent would require a floor which would be choitzetz between the man and the moon.
    Farming could be done by pouring ground-soil on top of your tent floor. However, you would still not touch the actual ground of the moon. The tent floor would still be in the way.

    in reply to: Did we really go to the moon #2191146
    Someday
    Participant

    To explain the conspiracy theory of the first moon landing:
    1) The flag is waving in the wind. There is no wind on in the moon.
    2) Any slight degree of deviation of target in 238,900 miles, would result in missing the moon by hundreds of miles. There was no such powerful computing power in 1969 to do that. A cell phone today has much more computing power than a computer the size of a large building had in 1969.
    3) Every video tape today of the first moon landing is proven to be a copy, not the original tape. If cutting and pasting was actually done (to produce a forgery,) it can only be proven on the original. The original is gone. Nasa says they accidentally taped something else over the original video tape. What was this? Someone’s bar mitzvah video that someone accidentally taped a football game over it?? It cost 355 million dollars, and billions in today’s money, and they weren’t careful???
    4) President Kennedy vowed to beat the Russians and that the USA would land on the moon before the end of the decade. They had to show something by 1969. The pressure was enormous.
    5) They were no where near the technology in that time to do this.
    6) Everyone involved in this hoax on the world, including the 3 original astronauts, could never ever reveal it, without becoming the most hated charlatans in history.
    7) There was never evidence found of a USA flag post left on the moon.

    Edited

    in reply to: Did we really go to the moon #2189944
    Someday
    Participant

    @avi k
    On the question of what does it mean in Kiddush Levana, כשם שאיני יכול לנגוע בך וכו׳ if today we can reach the moon.
    The answer is, even an astronaut on the moon cannot touch the moon – he cannot touch the moon with his bare hand or any part of his body directly. The astronaut must always be fully encased in his space suit to survive.
    – YMS
    Lakewood

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2183721
    Someday
    Participant

    @CS I am moicheh on the kovod of Aharon HaKoihen.
    You don’t talk that way. What is wrong with you, the moderators and everyone here for allowing that. Moderators, please remove that chiruf vegiduf. You should be banned.
    Why, btw, because Ahron Hakoihen wasn’t a Lubavitcher?
    Your am haaratzos is obvious too.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2182965
    Someday
    Participant

    @UJM I did not mean your first 2. I understood that.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2182943
    Someday
    Participant

    @CS
    This is not there in siman 81.

    Mainly, your reading in those words that Mashiach need not fight physical wars, rather only spiritual wars, is not there at all. Was Dovid against Goliyas a spiritual war. Where do you see it there?
    (Agav, I am not understanding why a slingshot is not Klei zayin, and what was Yehonasan’s involvement there? But I did not see see the context there.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2182942
    Someday
    Participant

    @UJM
    2 on your list, albeit true gedolim & tzaddikim, you are still stretching it too much.
    1 on your list, you are stretching it a bit.
    1 on your list is outrageously laughable (even to his own loyalist followers!)
    The rest are OK choices.

    in reply to: Why BDE #2180791
    Someday
    Participant

    @Pekak
    I was referring to Chazal (Kesubos 111b) and sefer Chofetz Chaim (Choivas Hashmirah) on the posuk Kiv Tal Torah Hu etc…

    in reply to: Why BDE #2180648
    Someday
    Participant

    @yungermanS Unfortunately, not everyone will be zoiche to techiyas hamaisim.


    @ujm
    It is always, everytime, transliterated incorrectly.

    in reply to: Sefira Reminders #2180568
    Someday
    Participant

    Text 601-255-1245

    What2pray2day-2: Attached is a what2pray2day Pesach schedule. To receive the schedule by email please respond with your email address. rmd.me/vkADWK0AUbG

    Text back to reply

    Or
    [email protected]

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 63 total)